DOCSLIB.ORG

World Bank Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World Bank Document Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Report No: 75889-BI PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON A PROPOSED GRANT Public Disclosure Authorized FROM THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITY TRUST FUND IN THE AMOUNT OF US$4.2 MILLION TO THE REPUBLIC OF BURUNDI FOR THE SUSTAINABLE COFFEE LANDSCAPE PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized April 9, 2013 Environment, Natural Resources, Water and Disaster Risk Management Unit (AFTN3) Sustainable Development Department Africa Region Public Disclosure Authorized This document is being made publicly available prior to Board consideration. This does not imply a presumed outcome. This document may be updated following Board consideration and the updated document will be made publicly available in accordance with the Bank’s policy on Access to Information. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange rate effective as of February 21, 2013) Currency Unit = Burundi Franc US$1 = 1,576 FBu FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AFS Annual Financial Statements ARFIC Autorité de Régulation de la Filière Café AFTAR World Bank -Agriculture and Rural Development Department of the Africa Region AFTCS World Bank - Fragile States, Conflict and Social Development team AFTEN World Bank - Environment Unit of the Africa Region AFTFM World Bank - Financial Management unit AFTPE World Bank - Africa procurement unit - East BNFR Bururi Nature Forest Reserve BOD Biochemical oxygen demand CAC Communal Approval Committees CAS Country Assistance Strategy CNAC National Coffee Growers Associations CWS Coffee washing station DPAE Provincial Department of Agriculture and Livestock EAC East Africa Community ERSG V Fifth Burundi Economic Reform Support Grants FM Financial Management GDP Gross Domestic Product GEB Global Environmental Benefits GEF Global Environmental Facility GoB Government of Burundi IDA International Development Association IE Impact Evaluation IFR Interim Financial Report INECN Institute National pour l’ Environment et la Conservation de la nature InterCafé Association Interprofessionnelle du Café du Burundi (InterCafé Burundi) IP Indigenous People IPCUs Inter-Provincial Coordination Units IFRs Interim Financial Reports IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature LLS Livelihoods and Landscape Strategy LVB Lake Victoria Basin LVEMP Lake Victoria Environmental Management Project MEEATU Ministry of Water, Environment, Land and Urban Planning MDDC Ministry of Decentralization and Communal Development MDGs Millennium Development Goals MINAGRIE Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock ii MINICOMT Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Tourism MIS Management Information System MSNRRRS Ministry National Solidarity and Repatriation of Displaced and Expatriated People and National Reconstruction MoF Ministry of Finance MoU Memorandum of Understanding MPR Ministries of Development Planning and Reconstruction M&E Monitoring and Evaluation NAPA National Adaptation Programme of Action NPSC National Policy Steering Committee NGOs Non Governmental Organizations NRM Natural resource management ODEB Organization for the Defense of Environment in Burundi ORAF Operational Risk Assessment Framework PA Protected Area PAMETT Protected Area Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool PACs Provincial Approval Committees PCU Project Coordination Unit PDO Project Development Objective PES Payment for Environmental Services POs Producer Organizations PRODEMA Agro-Pastoral Productivity and Markets Development Project PRASAB Projet de Rehabilitation et d 'Appui au Secteur Agricole et de Gestion Durable des Terres du Burundi (Agriculture Rehabilitation and Support, and Sustainable Land Management Project of Burundi) PRSP Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper PSC Project Steering Committee PSPs Private Sector Providers SCEP Service Chargé des Entreprises Publiques SEA Strategic Environmental Assessment SFM Sustainable Forest Management SIL Specific Investment Loan SLM Sustainable Land Management SLWM Sustainable Land and Water Management SMBC Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center SOGESTAL Sociétés de Gestion de Stations de Lavage SODECO Société de Deparcharge et de Conditionnement STAP Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel TA Technical Assistance ToR Terms of Reference R-SEA Rapid-Strategic Environment Assessment UNDP United Nations Development Programme Vice President: Makhtar Diop Country Director: Philippe Dongier Sector Director: Jamal Saghir Sector Manager: Magda Lovei Task Team Leaders: Paola Agostini Co Task Team Leader Stephen Ling iii BURUNDI Sustainable Coffee Landscape TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. -STRATEGIC CONTEXT ................................................................................................1 A. Country Context ............................................................................................................ 1 B. Sectoral and Institutional Context ................................................................................. 2 C. Higher Level Objectives to which the Project Contributes .......................................... 3 II. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES ................................................................6 A. PDO............................................................................................................................... 6 B. Project Beneficiaries ..................................................................................................... 6 C. PDO Level Results Indicators ....................................................................................... 7 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..............................................................................................7 A. Project Components ...................................................................................................... 8 B. Project Financing ........................................................................................................ 11 1. Lending Instrument ..................................................................................................... 11 2. Project Cost and Financing ......................................................................................... 11 Table No. 2 Project Cost and Financing ........................................................................... 11 C. Lessons Learned and Reflected in the Project Design ................................................ 11 IV. IMPLEMENTATION .....................................................................................................12 A. Institutional and Implementation Arrangements ........................................................ 12 B. Results Monitoring and Evaluation ............................................................................ 14 C. Sustainability............................................................................................................... 14 V. KEY RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ..........................................................15 A. Risk Ratings Summary Table ..................................................................................... 15 B. Overall Risk Rating Explanation ................................................................................ 15 VI. APPRAISAL SUMMARY ..............................................................................................16 A. Economic and Financial Analyses .............................................................................. 16 B. Technical ..................................................................................................................... 16 C. Financial Management ................................................................................................ 17 iv D. Procurement ................................................................................................................ 18 E. Social (including Safeguards) ..................................................................................... 18 F. Environment (including Safeguards) .......................................................................... 19 G. Safeguards Policies that might apply .......................................................................... 19 Annex 1: Results Framework and Monitoring .........................................................................22 Annex 2: Detailed project description (Background and project components) .....................27 I. Background .................................................................................................................... 27 II. Detailed Project Description ........................................................................................ 33 Project Development Objective ........................................................................................ 33 PDO Level Results Indicators ........................................................................................... 33 Project Components .......................................................................................................... 35 Annex 3: Implementation Arrangements ..................................................................................55 I. Project Institutional and Implementation Arrangements ............................................... 55 II. Financial Management, Disbursements and Procurement ........................................... 58 III. Environmental and Social (including safeguards) ...................................................... 72 IV. Monitoring & Evaluation ...........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Situation Report #2, Fiscal Year (FY) 2003 March 25, 2003 Note: the Last Situation Report Was Dated November 18, 2002
    U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT BUREAU FOR DEMOCRACY, CONFLICT, AND HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE (DCHA) OFFICE OF U.S. FOREIGN DISASTER ASSISTANCE (OFDA) BURUNDI – Complex Emergency Situation Report #2, Fiscal Year (FY) 2003 March 25, 2003 Note: The last situation report was dated November 18, 2002. BACKGROUND The Tutsi minority, which represents 14 percent of Burundi’s 6.85 million people, has dominated the country politically, militarily, and economically since national independence in 1962. Approximately 85 percent of Burundi’s population is Hutu, and approximately one percent is Twa (Batwa). The current cycle of violence began in October 1993 when members within the Tutsi-dominated army assassinated the first freely elected President, Melchoir Ndadaye (Hutu), sparking Hutu-Tutsi fighting. Ndadaye’s successor, Cyprien Ntariyama (Hutu), was killed in a plane crash on April 6, 1994, alongside Rwandan President Habyarimana. Sylvestre Ntibantunganya (Hutu) took power and served as President until July 1996, when a military coup d’etat brought current President Pierre Buyoya (Tutsi) to power. Since 1993, an estimated 300,000 Burundians have been killed. In August 2000, nineteen Burundian political parties signed the Peace and Reconciliation Agreement in Arusha, Tanzania, overseen by peace process facilitator, former South African President Nelson Mandela. The Arusha Peace Accords include provisions for an ethnically balanced army and legislature, and for democratic elections to take place after three years of transitional government. The three-year transition period began on November 1, 2001. President Pierre Buyoya is serving as president for the first 18 months of the transition period, to be followed in May 2003 by a Hutu president for the final 18 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS MAP OF BURUNDI I INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 II THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGROUPMENT CAMPS ...................................... 2 III OTHER CAMPS FOR DISPLACED POPULATIONS ........................................ 4 IV HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS DURING REGROUPMENT ......................... 6 Extrajudicial executions ......................................................................................... 6 Property destruction ............................................................................................... 8 Possible prisoners of conscience............................................................................ 8 V HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN THE CAMPS ........................................... 8 Undue restrictions on freedom of movement ......................................................... 8 "Disappearances" ................................................................................................... 9 Life-threatening conditions .................................................................................. 10 Insecurity in the context of armed conflict .......................................................... 11 VI HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS DISGUISED AS PROTECTION ................ 12 VII CONCLUSION.................................................................................................... 14 VIII RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................... 15
    [Show full text]
  • US Forest Service International Programs, Department of Agriculture
    US Forest Service International Programs, Department of Agriculture Republic of Burundi Technical Assistance to the US Government Mission in Burundi on Natural Resource Management and Land Use Policy Mission Dates: September 9 – 22, 2006 Constance Athman Mike Chaveas Hydrologist Africa Program Specialist Mt. Hood National Forest Office of International Programs 16400 Champion Way 1099 14th St NW, Suite 5500W Sandy, OR 97055 Washington, DC 20005 (503) 668-1672 (202) 273-4744 [email protected] [email protected] Jeanne Evenden Director of Lands Intermountain Region 324 25th Street Ogden, UT 84401 (801) 625-5150 [email protected] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to extend our gratitude to all those who supported this mission to Burundi. In particular we would like acknowledge Ann Breiter, Deputy Chief of Mission at the US Embassy in Bujumbura for her interest in getting the US Forest Service involved in the natural resource management issues facing Burundi. We would also like to thank US Ambassador Patricia Moller for her strong interest in this work and for the support of all her staff at the US Embassy. Additionally, we are grateful to the USAID staff that provided extensive technical and logistical support prior to our arrival, as well as throughout our time in Burundi. Laura Pavlovic, Alice Nibitanga and Radegonde Bijeje were unrelentingly helpful throughout our visit and fountains of knowledge about the country, the culture, and the history of the region, as well as the various ongoing activities and actors involved in development and natural resource management programs. We would also like to express our gratitude to the Minister of Environment, Odette Kayitesi, for taking the time to meet with our team and for making key members of her staff available to accompany us during our field visits.
    [Show full text]
  • Coping with Community Financing in Burundi
    COPING WITH COMMUNITY HEALTH FINANCING: Illness costs and their implications for poor households’ abilities to pay for health care and children’s access to health services. A Study for Save the Children UK. Angela Bate Sophie Witter International Programme Centre for Health Economics University of York Heslington York YO10 5DD [email protected] Save the Children 17 Grove Lane London SE5 8RD MARCH 2003 Coping with Community Financing in Burundi. 2 CONTENTS I. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 4 II. ACRONYMS 5 III. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 6 IV. OVERVIEW 13 PART ONE: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 14 A. INTRODUCTION 14 B. HEALTH SECTOR 15 C. COST RECOVERY 16 PART TWO: STUDY RATIONALE 20 A. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 20 B. HYPOTHESES 21 C. METHODS 21 PART THREE: RESEARCH FINDINGS 26 A. DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE 26 1. SAMPLE POPULATION 26 2. LIVELIHOODS 29 3. HOUSEHOLD SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS 32 4. OTHER FINDINGS 35 5. SUMMARY 35 B. PATTERNS OF ILLNESS 37 1. PREVALENCE OF ILLNESS 37 2. HOUSEHOLD ILLNESS 40 3. OTHER FINDINGS 41 4. SUMMARY 42 C. HEALTH SEEKING BEHAVIOUR 43 1. SEEKING TREATMENT 44 2. BARRIERS TO SEEKING TREATMENT 47 3. TREATMENT RESPONSES 49 4. OTHER FINDINGS 52 5. SUMMARY 53 D. COST OF ILLNESS 57 1. DIRECT COSTS: 57 2. COST AND QUALITY 60 3. TIME COSTS OF SEEKING CARE 62 Coping with Community Financing in Burundi. 3 4. OTHER FINDINGS 64 5. SUMMARY 65 E. HOUSEHOLD COPING STRATEGIES 66 1. OTHER FINDINGS 67 2. SUMMARY 67 F. COST PROTECTION AND RISK SHARING STRATEGIES 68 1. PRE-PAYMENT INSURANCE COVERAGE 69 2. EXEMPTIONS 72 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Burundi 2Nd 6/10/05 11:19 Am Page 1
    Burundi 2nd 6/10/05 11:19 am Page 1 Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue reportJuly2005 The Role of Informal Justice Systems in Fostering the Rule of Law in Post-Conflict Situations The Case of Burundi Tracy Dexter JD Dr Philippe Ntahombaye Burundi 2nd 6/10/05 11:19 am Page 2 Report The Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue is an independent and Acknowledgements impartial organisation, based in Geneva, This study was conducted at the initiative of the Centre for Humanitarian Switzerland, dedicated to Dialogue (HD Centre) based in Switzerland.The HD Centre undertook this the promotion of study in partnership with the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts humanitarian principles, University and the United States Institute for Peace. It was carried out by a the prevention of conflict team of researchers based in Burundi who benefited from the invaluable and the alleviation of its assistance of the bashingantahe institution, the officials of the Mayorship of effects through dialogue. Bujumbura and the provinces of Gitega, Makamba and Mwaro.The team of researchers warmly thanks the judges of the local tribunals, the members of 114, rue de lausanne the Commune-level bashingantahe councils, the Burundian civil society actors ch-1202 and the officials of the international organisations operating in Burundi, for geneva the data they provided to the work, and for their invaluable assistance.The switzerland team is also grateful for comments provided on earlier drafts by Ms Christine [email protected] t: + 41 22 908 11 30 Deslaurier and Mr Marcus
    [Show full text]
  • Increased Food Security in Four Provinces Catholic Relief Services Burundi Program Ofda Grant # Aot-G-00-97-00-358-00 Mid-Term Evaluation January 31,1998
    INCREASED FOOD SECURITY IN FOUR PROVINCES CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES BURUNDI PROGRAM OFDA GRANT # AOT-G-00-97-00-358-00 MID-TERM EVALUATION JANUARY 31,1998 PROGRAM MANAGER : BURUNDI CONTACT : SUZANNE MANZER DAVID ROTHROCK CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES COUNTRY REPRESENTATIVE BUJUMBURA, BURUNDI NO. 5, AVE. MUYINGA BUJUMBURA, BURUNDI TELEPHONE :257 0292 960 Mid-Term Evaluation ODFA 1 Increased Food Security in Four Provinces began in late September 1997 and will terminate on June 30 1998. The goal of this project is to increase agricultural production for 35,625 families in the provinces of Gitega, Muramvya, Rutana and Bujunlbura Rural. The objectives are to 1.) increase food security in Muramvya and Gitega Provinces by producing 340 MT of Irish potato seed and 33.6 MT of bean seed' ; 2.) increase pre-base rice and corn seed by 30 MT and 10 MT, respectively by June 30, 1998. This mid-term evaluation was conducted by Suzanne Manzer, Program Manager, Christian Nzeyimana, agricultural consultant, Director of DPAE Muramvya, Director of DPAE Gitega, site Directors at ISARU seed centers in Maliwa, Nyakararo, Mahwa, Gisozi and Moso, and input from the FA0 Emergency Office in Bujumbura. The current evaluation only discusses activities and project implementation to date, and, as a result, only considers season A 1998. I. PROGRAM OBJECTIVES Objective : 1.) Increase food security in Muramvya and Gitega Provinces by producing 340 MT of lrish potato seed and 33.6 MT of bean seed. A. PRODUCTION LEVEL! The project planned to plant 34 hectares of Irish potatoes for season A and 52 hectares of beans in season B.
    [Show full text]
  • Burundi Poverty Assessment
    Republic of Burundi Burundi Poverty Assessment June, 2016 GPV01 AFRICA 1 Contents Contents ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgement ......................................................................................................................... 9 Acronyms And Abbreviations ................................................................................................... 10 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 11 Chapter I – Country Context: Historical Review, Outlook And Projections ....................... 29 I. A History Of Violence Linked To Poor Economic Performance .......................................... 29 Ii. Recent Events And Macroeconomic Trends ......................................................................... 38 Iii. An Uncertain Future .............................................................................................................. 40 Chapter II – The Extent Of Poverty And Inequality............................................................... 42 I. Snapshot Of Consumption Poverty In 2013-14 ..................................................................... 43 Ii. Characteristics Of The Poor ................................................................................................... 49 Iii. The Level And Structure Of Inequality ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 29 September-5 October 2003-P
    SITUATION REPORT 29 September-5 October 2003 UNITED NATIONS NATIONS UNIES Office for the Coordination of Bureau de Coordination des Affaires Humanitarian Affairs in Burundi Humanitaires au Burundi www.ochaburundi.org www.ochaburundi.org ISSUES OF THE WEEK Humanitarian Activities 1. WFP brings aid to displaced Burundi civilians 2. CRS launches agricultural recovery campaign 3. Returnees as at 27 September 2003 Security Situation 4. Intensification of violence 5. Tension abates in northern Bujumbura suburbs Political 6. Mbeki mediates 7. Latest events Coordination 8. Contact Group meeting 9. GTS HUMANITARIAN ACTIVITIES 1. WFP brings aid to Burundi civilians displaced in clashes between rebel groups Following two weeks of fighting between two rebel groups that has led to the displacement of an estimated 50,000 civilians in the east and north-west of the Burundian capital, Bujumbura, food from the United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) has reached about 18,000 displaced persons in Mpanda Commune. WFP assisted over 26,000 persons in Mubimbi Commune with an emergency ration amounting to 144 tons of food for 10 days. WFP began the distribution of the Seeds Protection Rations (SPR) throughout the country. Last week, 1,858 tons were distributed to more than 169,000 farmers in Ngozi, Muramvya, Ruyigi, Gitega and Bujumbura Rural provinces. Over the next month, the WFP and its implementing partner CARE are targeting more than 150,000 vulnerable farming households with food aid. Some 750,000 people will benefit from the project, which is part of a coordinated programme with the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). The FAO is providing more than 210,000 farming households in Burundi with seeds and hoes and the WFP is providing food rations to ensure the farmers have enough food and do not eat their seeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Civilians Pay the Price of Faltering Peace Process a Human Rights Watch Briefing Paper February 2003
    Burundi: Civilians Pay the Price of Faltering Peace Process A Human Rights Watch Briefing Paper February 2003 Summary......................................................................................................................................... 0 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 3 The Ceasefire of December 2002.................................................................................................... 4 Cantonment ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Recruitment by the FDD................................................................................................................. 6 Food for the FDD............................................................................................................................ 8 The Meeting with the Ministers...................................................................................................... 8 The Attack at Mwegereza ............................................................................................................... 9 Rape .............................................................................................................................................. 12 Official Reactions to the Mwegereza Massacre............................................................................ 13 Military Justice.............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Council
    UNITED E NATIONS Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL E/CN.4/2006/109 23 December 2005 Original: ENGLISH COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Sixty-second session Item 19 of the provisional agenda ADVISORY SERVICES AND TECHNICAL COOPERATION IN THE FIELD OF HUMAN RIGHTS Report of the independent expert on the human rights situation in Burundi, Akich Okola GE.05-16823 (E) 050106 E/CN.4/2006/109 page 2 Summary In its resolution 2005/75, the Commission on Human Rights requested the independent expert to continue to study the situation of human rights in Burundi and requested him to submit an interim report to the General Assembly at its sixtieth session and a report to the Commission at its sixty-second session. The findings of his third mission in July 2005 were the basis of his report (A/60/354) to the General Assembly. The independent expert undertook his fourth mission to Burundi from 4 to 15 October 2005. The present report is based on that last mission and covers the period from 15 August to 15 December 2005. During his mission the independent expert met with senior State officials and senior officials from national institutions, national and international non-governmental organizations, diplomatic missions, United Nations agencies and international organizations, including the Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary-General and Special Representative of the African Union in Burundi. He also undertook a follow-up mission to Gitega where he visited the prison and the Mushasha primary school, and met with local officials. The present report addresses in section I the political and security situation in Burundi.
    [Show full text]
  • Burundi Article 15 Decision
    ICC-01/17-9-Red 09-11-2017 1/94 RH PT Co Original: English No. ICC-01/17-X Date: 25 October 2017 Date Public Redacted Version: 9 November 2017 PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER III Before: Judge Chang-ho Chung, Presiding Judge Judge Antoine Kesia‐Mbe Mindua Judge Raul C. Pangalangan SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF BURUNDI Public Public Redacted Version of “Decision Pursuant to Article 15 of the Rome Statute on the Authorization of an Investigation into the Situation in the Republic of Burundi”, ICC-01/17-X-9-US-Exp, 25 October 2017 No: ICC-01/17-X 1/94 9 November 2017 ICC-01/17-9-Red 09-11-2017 2/94 RH PT Decision to be notified in accordance with regulation 31 of the Regulations of the Court to: The Office of the Prosecutor Counsel for the Defence Fatou Bensouda, Prosecutor James Stewart, Deputy Prosecutor Legal Representatives of Victims Legal Representatives of Applicants Unrepresented Victims Unrepresented Applicants for Participation/Reparations The Office of Public Counsel for The Office of Public Counsel for the Victims Defence States Representatives Amicus Curiae REGISTRY Registrar Defence Support Section Herman von Hebel, Registrar Victims and Witnesses Unit Detention Section Nigel Verrill, Chief Victims Participation and Reparations Other Section Philipp Ambach, Chief No: ICC-01/17-X 2/94 9 November 2017 ICC-01/17-9-Red 09-11-2017 3/94 RH PT I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY ............................................................................. 4 II. PRELIMINARY MATTERS ........................................................................... 5 A. Classification of the Request ..................................................................... 5 B. Delayed Notification under Article 18 of the Statute .......................... 10 C. Victims ........................................................................................................ 12 D.
    [Show full text]
  • After-Action Review
    United Nations Nations Unies Office for the Coordination Bureau de Coordination Of Humanitarian Affairs in Burundi Des Affaires Humanitaires au Burundi http://ochaonline.un.org/Burundi http://ochaonline.un.org/Burundi Burundi Weekly Humanitarian News 10 – 16 NOVEMBER 2008 Activities and Updates Update on utilisation of CERF Makamba, 628 returnees came from Mtabila refugee funding in response to the Global camp, whereas 523 were former 1972 refugees from Katumba settlement. Food Crisis. FAO was the main recipient of CERF monies in Since the beginning of this year, a total of 87,666 response to the GFC in Burundi. FAO’s project Burundian refugees have returned: 435 in January, aimed at increasing food production thus improving 1,991 in February, 8,377 in March, 6,675 in April, access to food for households in rural, peri-urban 5,272 in May, 19,635 in June, 17,504 in July, 9,642 and urban areas who became food insecure as a in August, and 8,439 in September, 6,863 in result of the Global Food Crisis. Activities started in October, and 2,833 so far in November. The figures October, as soon as FAO received the CERF funds include the return of 25,393 refugees from 1972. in October. UNHCR opens new antenna offices in BAQN (Bujumbura urban and peri-urban), PARMA ALIMENTA (Rubilizi, Kivoga and Mpanda), CEPBU southern Burundi UNHCR opened two antenna offices on 18 (Maramvya, Rukaramu, Gatumba and Buringa) November in the cities of Bururi and Rutana in Direction Provinciale Agriculture et Elevage –DPAE- southern Burundi, with a total of seven national staff (Bujumbura rural Kanyosha) were selected as members.
    [Show full text]