Quick viewing(Text Mode)

Introduction

Introduction

INTRODUCTION

In this work an attempt has bee n made for the first time to analyze thoroughly the political, eth nical, cultural, socioeconomic, a nd histori­ cal situation, particularl y between 1944 and 1980, of the national minorities in . The author's main objective is to give a fact ual account of the existing conditions a mo ng the nationali ties, also con­ sidering, however, the period between the two world wars. This is a topic of considerable complexi ty. In order to gi ve an objective picture of the situation it was necessary to use almost all the more detailed scientific works and studies published in the West, as well as other wri tten material. This incl uded an analysis of official Romanian data; declarations and reports in the press that were not always free of political and ideological doctrine; informat ion provided by sources that were not published but were considered re liable; and, finally, the personal experience of the author in the country as well as his analysis of the limited available material from Romania concerning the immediate postwar years. and its fatefu l histori cal devel opment are the center of interest. A short summa ry of its history, indispensable for a better understanding, fo ll ows. The two largest and most significant national minorities, the Hun­ garians and the , played a dominant role in the historical development of the country and the evolution of its culture. The situa­ tion of other nationalities is also analyzed, particularly that of the Jewish minority which today is numerically insignificant but which once played an important role in the development of the country's NATIONAL MINORITIES IN ROMANIA 2 INTRODUCTION 3 culture. It must be pointed out here that the Romanian people, as the The basis of the development of the feudal system. which started in national majority, have always had very different social, economic, the 13th- 15 th centuries was the all iance of the three nations: the Hun­ and cultural traditions than the national minorities in present-day garia n nobles in the counties, the Szeklers , and the free peasants and Romania; and significant differences still prevail. These may be tradesmen of the autonomous Saxon territories. The fed erative explained primarily by peculiarities in historical development. It must alliance of the three "nations" (Unio trium narionum Transsylvaniae), also be taken into account that the relation of the Romanian majority concl uded in 143 7, was aimed mainly at the revolting peasants. In the to the national minorities is still determined to a great extent by great foll owing year. 1438, the alliance was confirmed; and at that time, as a power interests a nd contradictory ideas and opinions. It is very diffi­ consequence of the weakening of the Habsburgs' power, its character cult for an outsider to obtain reliable and sufficiently detailed informa­ as a defensive pact against the Turkish incursions was emphasized. tion about the result of all this. Consequently, the public is poorly Thi s pact was renewed in 1542 and remained the basis of the state info rmed about the situation of those more than three million people administration for more than fo ur centuries. It was not conceived in a who are members of national minorities in Romania today and about democratic spirit: the Hungarian and Saxon bondsmen (free peasants the changes in their culture and society during the last quarter of a a nd serfs) as well as the Romanian peasants were not included among century. those permitted to exercise political rights. The changes in the situation The notion Transylvania will be explained in the chapter "Territory of the bondsmen occurred parallel to the development of the feudal and Population." Suffice to say. here. that the old Hungarian name of system. that territory is "Erdely" or "Erdoelve". (since the ninth or tenth centu­ As a res ult of the penetration of Ottoman Turkish power into Cen­ ries) from which the Romanian designation "Ardeal" derives. Like the tral Eu rope. the medieval Hungarian ki ngdom disintegrated into three original Hungarian name, the translation "Transilvania" means parts (1541 ). Transylvania as a principality was relatively independent "the country beyond the forest," coming from the west, i.e., from between 1542 and 1688, without giving up its ties wi th . Hungary. This name is used by Romanian authors and others to desig­ Under the leaders hip of Hungarian the Transylvanian Princi­ nate the entire territory, which belonged to Hungary before 1919. The palit y had a certain degree of sovereignty, a viable state organization. German name "Siebenbiirgen" refers to the historical territory of the an independent army and financial system, and diplomatic connections independent Transylvanian Principality. This name originates, accord­ as a vassal state in loose feudal dependence on the Turkish . It ing to one of several hypotheses, from "Cibinburg" in the of paid tribute but was free from Turkish occupation and strived to pre­ Hermannstadt. Divided from the territory of Old Romania by the serve its internal independence between the Turkish and the Habsburg , about 20 to 35 miles wide and in some places by a policy of balance. It resisted successfully all Turkish more than 6.500 fcet high. Transylvania is not only a geographic unity attempts at invasion for one-and-a-half centuries. but differs greatly from the other areas of present-day Romania, also In this epoch. Transylvania was in close contact with the weste rn in its western-oriented cultural history, its historical development, and spi ri tual movements and became the most developed cultural center of its religious traditions. the Danubian territory. a country of religious tolerance and of peaceful This work deals with the peoples that have been part of the history coexistence between the different nationalit ies. of Transylvania ever since the Hungarian conquest in 896 AD. Soon At the turn of the 16th century (1591-1606) the unity of Transyl­ after that conquest, the Hungarian kings were forced by frequent vania was destroyed by civil wars between rival dukes, and the country incursions from the east to develop defenses in Transylvania. Besides finally was forced to give up its independence owing to the powe r such peoples as Cumanians, Uzes, Petchenegues, and Yaziges, German politics of the Turks and the Habsburgs. A couple of years later. an settlers (hospires), the so-called Transylvanian . were called in outsta nding pe rsonality, (1613-1629) renewed during the 12th century. In the territory of Transylaniva, stability and ord er in Transylvania. () first were mentioned in historical records from the 13th After the defeat of the Turks, the Habsburgs made Transylvania into century. an Austrian crown colony (1687). ruled according to special statutes 5 4 NATIONAL M INORITIES IN ROMANIA INTRODUCTION as Grand Principality (1688-1867). The legal basis of the Austrian tion was defeated by the Habsburg a rmy with the help of Russian army admi nistration ( Gubernium) with its seat in Hermannstadt was un its. The personalities who led this revolutionary movement, included established by an agreement between Transylvania and the Habsburgs, among the Saxons. Stephan Ludwig Rot h, who fought for the libera­ the Leopoldine Diploma ( 1691), and was confi rmed in the peace treaty tion of the serfs; among the Hungaria ns, and the free­ of Karlowitz in 1699. Although the Leo poldine Diploma secured the dom poet Alexander Petofi; and, a mong the Romanians, Nicolae a utonomous constitution of Transylvania. the domi nation of Billcescu wh o, from beyond the Carpathians and Avram lancu, organ­ resulted in the decrease in significance of the autonomous nations; ized the reVO lutionary Romanians in Transylvania. important decisions were made by . With res pect to the significance of 1848- 1849 , each of the three T he Habsburg rule contributed beyond doubt to the stability and Transylvanian nationalities had its own view. It is nevertheless certain development of western culture in Transylvania . It should not pass that, apart from the abolition of se rfdom. none of the nations was wi thout mention, however, that misuse of power by the government content wit h the events of the revolution. An era followed ( 1849-1 860), a nd the use of forceful methods such as pu nitive expeditions against a period ca ll ed Neo-absolutism, in which Vienna suppressed all initia­ the national ities, particularly the . occurred and, the privi­ tive shown by the nationalities. After the rei ntroduction of the autono­ leges of the were considerably restricted. The mous Tra nsylvania n constitution, by the Diploma of October 1860, the causes of this included internal disagreements, the desire for centraliza­ Austrian gove rnment, under the influence of the dominant Eu ropean tion in Vienna. and finally the restriction of traditional religious toler­ ideas of the epoch, was liberalized to a certain extent. At the Diet of ance by the Counter . The curtailment of the national Herma nn stadt in 1863-1 864. the Romanians were re presented by their rights of the Hungarians led fin ally. under the leadership of Duke own deputies fo r the fi rst time. This was the fi rst attempt to bring Ferenc Rilk6czi !l (1703- 17 11). to the revolt of the Kurucesstrivi ng for about an autonomous Transylvania in a democratic spirit and to create national independence . the basis for peaceful coexiste nce among its nationalities. The resolu­ A century of poli tical activity. lively in every respect, fOllowed in tions of the Diet we re, however, never fulfilled. which the T ransylvania n nat ionalities' aspirations to emancipation The unsuccessful wa rs led by the Habsburgs against in 1859­ and demands fo r social reform were of increasing significance. The Romanians based their demands on the ideas of the "Transylvanian 1860 and 1866, as well as the desire to reunite Transylvania wi th H un­ School" [Scoala Ardeleana] which was founded by Greek Catholic gary, eve ntually led to the histori cal compromise (A usgleich) of 1867 (Orthodox turned Roman Catholic) intellectuals and was of extreme and the creati on of the Austro-Hungarian which was a real importance in the development of national consci ousness. In their peti­ union under one monarch . The union of Tra ns ylvania wi th Hungary tion Supplex Libel/us Valachorum they demanded national autono­ was confirmed. Neither the Transylvanian Saxons nor the Romanians mous rights and more social liberalization. Emperor Joseph !l's considered this compromise satisfactory- the Saxons. because they attempt to introduce the into the administration were afraid that their traditional rights would be restricted in a Hun­ later contribu ted to the development of Hungarian . garian national state; and the Romanians because of their struggle fo r Finally. in the revolution of 1848- 1849, earlier tensions exploded an independent state. Article 44 of the Hungarian nationality law of into armed conflict. This revolution, with its sharpening of antagonism 1868, which controll ed the rig hts of the nationalities in the Hungarian among the nationalities of Transylvania. heralded a new epoch in the half of the monarchy, guaranteed equal rights to all nationalities . The history of the country. Wanting to defe nd their rights, the Saxons, liberal provisi ons of this law were not, however, respected by the entire together wi th the Romanians who aspired to national recognit ion, political leadership. Parl iamentary freedom, in any case, existed at that supported the Habsburgs against the Hungarian rev ol uti onaries, who time (alt hough restricted by the so-called class election system), and fought for national independence. In 1849 the Hungarian revolution­ the national mi norities we re in the position to develop their economy ary government seceded from Austria, a nd the and culture freely. The Transylvanian Romanians had made de mands declared the unification of Transylvania with Hunga ry. This revolu- that none of the Hunga rian gove rnments we re able to ful fill. Towards NATIONAL M INORITIES IN ROMANIA 6 INTRODUCTI ON 7 the end of the First World War, attempts at Hungarian-Romanian dear Anna, who has played a considera ble part in the completion of rapprochement were unsuccessful. this work, as well as to the Southeast European Institute in Munich After the dissol ut ion of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy at the end and the T ransylvanian Library in Gundelsheim from which I have of the First World War. the Romanian National Assem bl y proclaimed received valuable material. I would a lso like to thank Professor in the declaration of Alba lulia/ Gyulafehervar on December I, 19 18, Stephen Fischer-Galati, Editor of the East European Quarterly, joining T ransylvania to Romania in spite of Hungarian protests. This Bo uld er, for ma king the publishing of this work possible, and was confirmed by the Allied and Associated Grea t Powers in the peace Dr. Ernst Wagner, who read the ma nuscript and contributed valuable treaty of T rianon (. 1920). It must be pointed out here that the remarks and suggestions. annexation of Transylvania. the eastern territories of Hungary, a nd the eastern part of the by Roma nia had bee n agreed upon secre tly Schliersee, January 1981. £Ierner //lye. between Romania and the Allied powe rs fro m August 4. 1916. as a re ward to Romania for changi ng sides in the First World War. Because the resolutions of Alba lulia secured the cultural autonomy of the nati onalities. the T ransylvanian Saxons, although not unani­ mously. joi ned the Romanians in the Declaration of Union of Mediasch on January 8. 191 9. The German po pUlation of the Banat (Swabians) were in it ially against the di vis io n of their territory and its partial unification with Romania. After the Romanian army had occupied the eastern part of the Banat and the peace treaty of T rianon was ratified. these joined the Saxons and the Romanians. In the peace treaty of T rianon, Romania received not only his torical Transylvania but also large a reas of eastern Hungary: Marama ros/ M a ramu r e~ . Szatmar/ , Kbrbsvidek/ Cri jana, and the east­ ern part of the Banat. The decision was based o n the numerical supe­ riority of Romanians, although thei r absolute majority of 53.8% was not ve ry significant. In this way a multinational and multiconfessional was created that has had to deal with the problem of the national minorities ever since.

• • • T he appendix contains a subject index, an index of names, and a li st of place names in three languages. T he place names given here are those used officially today in Romania; the are ap­ plied acco rding to the historical forms on the basis of the statistics established in 19 10; and the German place names are given in their generally used historical fo rms. Data and material available up to January 198 1 have been used in this work. In conclusi on, I wish to express my greatest thanks to my

Top View