A Stage Approach to Transnational Migration Migrant Narratives from Rural Romania

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Stage Approach to Transnational Migration Migrant Narratives from Rural Romania A Stage Approach to Transnational Migration Migrant Narratives from Rural Romania Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philodophy to the Department of Sociology at the University of Osnabrück By Ruxandra Oana Ciobanu From Constan ţ a Osnabrück, 2010 PhD thesis defended at the Faculty of Social Sciences of the University of Osnabrück, under the supervision of Professor Dr. Michael Bommes, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Osnabrück and Dr. Christina Boswell, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Edinburgh 2 To my extended family 3 Acknowledgements For me sociology is a life style and the interaction with others is an everyday reality without which it is very difficult for me to exist. This has been proven in the spring of the year 2007 when I was writing up my PhD thesis and I was forced to live alone, because my flatmates left for their fieldworks. The advantage was that I was fully immersed in the writing, whereas when they returned I was more immersed in our conversations. I thank them for encouraging and distracting me when necessary. I think I am a very lucky person because I have had the honour to meet wonderful people. Many of them influenced me and my work more or less intentionally. I thank very much all those who discussed with me, smiled to me and encouraged me in my work. Migration is not only a subject of study for me. It overlaps with my biography – given that I experienced internal migration for studies by moving to Bucharest, and later on lived in Budapest, Hamburg, Edinburgh, Geneva and Lisbon. The present thesis is an outcome of my constant interest in migration research beginning with the second year of university (2001). Since then I participated in many research projects coordinated by Professor Dumitru Sandu who has become a mentor to me. There are not enough words to thank him. In spite of generously offering me a lot of his time, he was happy for me to conduct my PhD under the supervision of Professor Michael Bommes. I met Professor Michael Bommes while I was participating in the project “Expanding the Knowledge Base of Migration Policy Making in Eastern Europe” supported by a Marie Curie Excellence Grant. He later on became my supervisor. He inspired me a lot in my theoretical research and showed me how to make the most of my empirical data. I thank him for all the revelatory discussions that we had. During the above mentioned project I conducted the fieldwork in Romania and in Spain that I could later on use in my own PhD research. I thank the project coordinator, Dr. Christina Boswell and my colleagues Tim Elrick, Emilia Lewandowska and Drago ș Radu for the long discussions and the cycling rides we took together. My PhD research benefited also from the financial support of the University of Bucharest that offered me a scholarship. I am also very happy to have been part of two migration research groups; the Migration Research Group at the Hamburg Institute of International Economics and the Migration and Citizenship Research Group at the University of Edinburgh. Both of them constituted places for discussion where I presented my work in progress and received valuable feed-back. I am also very grateful to Professor Lynn Jamieson, Dr. Pontus Odmalm, 4 Professor Jo Shaw, Professor Liz Stanley, and Professor Lynn Staeheli from the University of Edinburgh. Another milieu that I was very lucky to be part of was the IMISCOE network – International Migration, Integration and Social Cohesion. This network facilitated my participation in conferences and workshops where I presented different bits and pieces of my PhD research. Special thanks to Dr. Pascal Goeke who made accessible for me some important texts of the German sociology. The last hundred meters of my PhD benefited from the financial support and scientific input from the TOM network –Transnationality of Migrants. Special thanks also to Catherine Grosvenor who did miracles with the language of my PhD thesis. I would like to thank Professor Margarida Marques for her thorough comments and support in the final changes of the thesis. The inhabitants from the two villages 1 – Luncavi ţ a and Feldru – were very open to me, and helped me greatly in my stay there, as well as in Spain. They were the ones that made possible my research. In the following pages I will say their story the way I understood it. My eternal gratitude goes to my mother Maria who has been next to me day and night encouraging me in the hardest and most irrational moments and to Vitaliano for his patience and understanding of my territorial mobility. In the loneliest moments and when I felt very remote from the world, my friends have been there listening to my whining. I thank you for understanding and accepting what I do and not look at me in a strange manner and pose the unposable question ‘And … when will you get a normal job?’ In the name of all the ‘oppressed’ PhD students I want to stand up and say ‘This is as normal as I can get!’ Working for my PhD has been a great adventure and has enriched me both intellectually and humanly. I have never felt that my work was a burden, all I felt is that I am alive and I am lucky to do what I am doing. 1 The names of the respondents to the interviews are fictional in order to assure the anonymity of the migrants. 5 6 Table of Contents CHAPTER I: Introduction _____________________________________________________ 11 CHAPTER II: Revisiting theories of international migration _________________________ 19 II.1 Concepts and theories___________________________________________________ 20 II.1.1 Circular / temporary migration _________________________________________ 20 II.1.2 Transnationalism ____________________________________________________ 21 II.1.3 Social connections ___________________________________________________ 27 II.2 A stage-approach to migration ___________________________________________ 34 II.3 Systems theory in migration research______________________________________ 36 CHAPTER III: Research Methodology ___________________________________________ 40 III.1 Methodologies in migration research _____________________________________ 40 III.2 Narratives / Biographical interviews / Life stories ___________________________ 43 III.3 Selection of the Sites ___________________________________________________ 44 CHAPTER IV: Migration Narratives: The Analysis of the Migration from Luncavi ţ a and Feldru to Spain ______________________________________________________________ 51 IV.1 Context in the origin community _________________________________________ 52 IV.1.1 Location factors _____________________________________________________ 53 IV.1.2 Socio-economic milieu ________________________________________________ 54 IV.1.3 Cultural context _____________________________________________________ 58 IV.2 Family narratives: the Romanian migratory landscape as seen through family stories____________________________________________________________________ 63 IV.2.1 The Banu family _____________________________________________________ 65 IV.2.2 The Pop family ______________________________________________________ 71 IV.2.3 Comparison of the two family structures __________________________________ 77 IV.3 Migrants’ stories ______________________________________________________ 81 IV.3.1 Cornel and Luiza ____________________________________________________ 81 IV.3.2 Sebastian _________________________________________________________ 101 IV.3.3 Mioara ___________________________________________________________ 115 CHAPTER V: Community narratives of Luncavi ţ a and Feldru: migration patterns, economic integration and life in Spain __________________________________________ 122 IV.4.1 Luncavi ţ a _________________________________________________________ 122 IV.4.2 Feldru ___________________________________________________________ 131 V.1 Stages in the migration from Luncavi ţ a and Feldru _________________________ 135 7 CHAPTER VI: Migration Policy Making in the Country of Origin____________________ 139 VI.1. Migration Theories and Migration Policies _______________________________ 142 VI.2 The country of origin__________________________________________________ 143 VI.2.1 Remittances and investment __________________________________________ 146 VI.3 Romanian migration policies ___________________________________________ 152 VI.4 Grounded policy making_______________________________________________ 155 VI.4.1 Community level ___________________________________________________ 155 VI.4.2 National level ______________________________________________________ 156 VI.5 Systems theory approach to migration policy making_______________________ 158 CHAPTER VII: Conclusions: The meta-narrative of Romanian migration _____________ 162 VII.1 Methodological conclusions____________________________________________ 164 VII.2 Migration projects ___________________________________________________ 167 VII.2.1 Disparate social connections _________________________________________ 168 VII.2.2 Family migration __________________________________________________ 168 VII.2.3 Community networks _______________________________________________ 170 VII.3 Patterns of migration _________________________________________________ 170 VII.3.1 1990-1995 _______________________________________________________ 172 VII.3.2 1996-2001 _______________________________________________________ 176 VII.3.3 2002-2006 _______________________________________________________ 178 VII.3.4 Post-2007 ________________________________________________________ 181 VII.4 Romanian
Recommended publications
  • Country Coding Units
    INSTITUTE Country Coding Units v11.1 - March 2021 Copyright © University of Gothenburg, V-Dem Institute All rights reserved Suggested citation: Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, and Lisa Gastaldi. 2021. ”V-Dem Country Coding Units v11.1” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. Funders: We are very grateful for our funders’ support over the years, which has made this ven- ture possible. To learn more about our funders, please visit: https://www.v-dem.net/en/about/ funders/ For questions: [email protected] 1 Contents Suggested citation: . .1 1 Notes 7 1.1 ”Country” . .7 2 Africa 9 2.1 Central Africa . .9 2.1.1 Cameroon (108) . .9 2.1.2 Central African Republic (71) . .9 2.1.3 Chad (109) . .9 2.1.4 Democratic Republic of the Congo (111) . .9 2.1.5 Equatorial Guinea (160) . .9 2.1.6 Gabon (116) . .9 2.1.7 Republic of the Congo (112) . 10 2.1.8 Sao Tome and Principe (196) . 10 2.2 East/Horn of Africa . 10 2.2.1 Burundi (69) . 10 2.2.2 Comoros (153) . 10 2.2.3 Djibouti (113) . 10 2.2.4 Eritrea (115) . 10 2.2.5 Ethiopia (38) . 10 2.2.6 Kenya (40) . 11 2.2.7 Malawi (87) . 11 2.2.8 Mauritius (180) . 11 2.2.9 Rwanda (129) . 11 2.2.10 Seychelles (199) . 11 2.2.11 Somalia (130) . 11 2.2.12 Somaliland (139) . 11 2.2.13 South Sudan (32) . 11 2.2.14 Sudan (33) .
    [Show full text]
  • Ana-Teodora Kurkina Department of History Graduate School for East and Southeast European Studies Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich / University of Regensburg
    East European Quarterly Vol. 44, No. 1-2, pp. 53-76, March-June 2016 © Central European University 2016 ISSN: 0012-8449 (print) 2469-4827 (online) WORDS AND WITS: A TERRITORIAL DEBATE AND THE CREATION OF AN EPISTEMIC COMMUNITY IN INTERWAR DOBRUJA (1913-1940) Ana-Teodora Kurkina Department of History Graduate School for East and Southeast European Studies Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich / University of Regensburg Abstract This article establishes a link between a creation of an epistemic community and a territorial debate while addressing the Romanian-Bulgarian dispute regarding Dobruja. Moving beyond approaches centered on an investigation of similar territorial debates over contested lands and their immediate outcomes, the paper primarily analyses the potential of a political conflict for generating a community of intellectuals who become involved in propagating their respective state and nation-building causes. Putting the case of interwar Dobruja into the context of “entangled history”, the study clarifies its place within the framework of similar debates regarding other borderlands. Relying on the publications of the participants of the debate, the article claims that a conflict over a territory and the possibilities of its integration binds together influential public actors, various representatives of the local intellectual elite, uniting them in an unlikely epistemic community. Keywords: epistemic community, social networking, state-building, Dobruja Introduction A borderland is not only a contact zone (Pratt 1992, p. 4), but a constant source of political creativity for the local public actors. Territorial frames of an idealized nation-state are usually vague, contested, based on various interpretations of multiple historical legacies and their application to practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Trachelipus Species (Crustacea, Isopoda, Oniscidea) in Romanian Fauna: Morphology, Ecology, and Geographic Distribution
    NORTH-WESTERN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY 11 (Supplement 1): S1-S106 ©NwjZ, Oradea, Romania, 2015 Article No.: e150301 http://biozoojournals.ro/nwjz/index.html Trachelipus species (Crustacea, Isopoda, Oniscidea) in Romanian fauna: morphology, ecology, and geographic distribution Nicolae TOMESCU1*, Lucian Alexandru TEODOR1, Sára FERENȚI2, 3 and Severus-Daniel COVACIU-MARCOV2 1. “Babeş-Bolyai” University, Faculty of Biology and Geology, Department of Biology, Gheorghe Bilaşcu (Republicii) str. 44; 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. 2. University of Oradea, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology, Universității str. 1, 410087 Oradea, Romania. 3. “Iosif Vulcan” National College, Jean Calvin str. 3, Oradea, Romania. *Corresponding author`s e-mail: [email protected] Received: 12. September 2014 / Accepted: 10. March 2015 / Available online: 15. December 2015 / Printed: December 2015 Abstract. Specific morphological characters are re-described in 12 species of Trachelipus genus, found in Romanian fauna: T. trilobatus (Stein, 1859), T. ater (Budde-Lund, 1896), T. varae (Radu, 1949), T. ratzeburgii (Brandt, 1833), T. bujori (Radu, 1950), T. difficilis (Radu, 1950), T. affinis (Koch, 1841) = T. wächtleri (Strouhal, 1851), T. arcuatus (Budde-Lund, 1885), T. rathkii (Brandt, 1833), T. pleonglandulatus (Radu, 1950), T. nodulosus (Koch, 1838), T. squamuliger (Verhoeff, 1907). Descriptions are illustrated with figures for all characters. The species, which were synonymised in the past, are described comparatively (T. varae and T. ater, T. bujori and T. ratzeburgii, T. difficilis and T. affinis = T. wächtleri, T. pleonglandulatus and T. rathkii). The comparative descriptions emphasize that the synonymised species are valid. The variations of some morphological characters and morphological anomalies observed on the studied specimens are noted in each species.
    [Show full text]
  • Courses Catalogue 2021 General Directorate for Human Resources Management
    R O M A N I A MINISTRY OF NATIONAL DEFENCE Human Resources Management General Directorate COURSES CATALOGUE 2021 GENERAL DIRECTORATE FOR HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT Page 2 Courses Catalogue 2021 ROU MoD GENERAL DIRECTORATE FOR HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS General information on Courses Catalogue 4 Request for quotas 5 Application form 6 Romania in brief 8 Romanian education and training institutions and courses 19 “CAROL the 1st” National Defense University 20 National Defense College 22 Crisis Management and Multinational Operations Department 23 Regional Department of Defence Resources Management Studies 30 Foreign Languages Centre 36 “MIHAI VITEAZUL” Land Forces Combined Arms Training School, Piteşti 37 “Bucegi” Mountain Troops Training Center, Predeal 39 “General Grigore Baştan” ISR, Airborne, and JTAC Training Center, 44 Buzău “Panait Donici” Engineering, EOD, and CBRN Defense Training Center 51 Page 3 Courses Catalogue 2021 ROU MoD GENERAL DIRECTORATE FOR HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT General Information In the actual international security and defense context, education and training is to be considered, more than ever, as an important tool for creating a common under- standing of the principals, values and relevance of interoperability concept for forces that act together under the auspices of the international security organizations. Being fully aware of this idea, Romanian Ministry of Defense offers its partners the opportunity to educate and train military and civilian personnel of their armed forc- es through courses organized in the Romanian education and training facilities. To choose the right course for the right person is not an easy task, as the large amount of information in this area is not always well structured and accessible at the moment when those who are interested need it.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf (Accessed in December 2017)
    Balkanologie Revue d'études pluridisciplinaires Vol. 15 n° 1 | 2020 Mémoires performatives : faire des passés et des présents Remembering and being. The memories of communist life in a Turkish Muslim Roma community in Dobruja (Romania) Se souvenir et exister. Les mémoires de la vie sous le communisme dans une communauté rom musulmane turcophone de Dobrudja (Roumanie) Adriana Cupcea Electronic version URL: https://journals.openedition.org/balkanologie/2497 DOI: 10.4000/balkanologie.2497 ISSN: 1965-0582 Publisher Association française d'études sur les Balkans (Afebalk) Electronic reference Adriana Cupcea, “Remembering and being. The memories of communist life in a Turkish Muslim Roma community in Dobruja (Romania)”, Balkanologie [Online], Vol. 15 n° 1 | 2020, Online since 01 June 2020, connection on 05 August 2021. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/balkanologie/2497 ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/balkanologie.2497 This text was automatically generated on 5 August 2021. © Tous droits réservés Remembering and being. The memories of communist life in a Turkish Muslim Rom... 1 Remembering and being. The memories of communist life in a Turkish Muslim Roma community in Dobruja (Romania) Se souvenir et exister. Les mémoires de la vie sous le communisme dans une communauté rom musulmane turcophone de Dobrudja (Roumanie) Adriana Cupcea 1 My research is part of a direction regarding the current situation of the Turkish Muslim Roma in the national states of the Balkans, created after the fall of the Ottoman Empire, and it puts forward the description of a Muslim Roma Turkish-speaking community in a post-socialist city, Medgidia (Mecidiye), in the south-eastern part of Dobruja.
    [Show full text]
  • LEAGUE OE HATIONS. Communicated to the C .358.1934, I
    LEAGUE OE HATIONS. Communicated to the C .358.1934, I . Members of the Council. ' Geneva, August 27th, 1934, PROTECTION OF MINORITIES IN ROIMANIA. PETITIONS FROM M. ANGHEL STOYANOFF, CONCERNING THE SITUATION OF THE BULGARIAN MINORITY IN SOUTHERN DOBRUJA. (Documents C.646, 0.659.1933.I and 0.153.1934.1). Note by the Se ere tary-General. Under the Council resolution of June 13th, 1929, paragraph 4, i), the Secretary-General has the honour to circulate, for the information of the Members of the Council, a letter addressed to him by the Representatives of Panama, Denmark and France with regard to the examina­ tion of two telegraphic petitions and a supplementary statement from M. Anghel Stoyanoff, relating to the situa­ tion of the Bulgarian minority in the Southern Dobruja, and of the observations of the Roumanian Government thereon. In accordance with the Council resolution referred to above, the documents concerning this question are kept in the archives of the Secretariat at the disposal of the Members of the Council. Letter from the representatives of Panama, Denmark and France to the Secretary-General. In accordance with the Council resolution of October 25th, 1920, a Minorities Committee composed of the represen­ tatives of Panama (as Chairman), Denmark and France was called upon to consider two telegraphic petitions and a supplementary statement dated respectively September, October and November 1933, from M. Angel Stoyanoff relat­ ing to the situation of the Bulgarian minority in the southern Dobruja, together with the observations on the subject sub­ mitted by the Roumanian Government (Documents C.646.1933.I ., C.659.1933.I and C .153.1934.I).
    [Show full text]
  • Ethno-Confessional Realities in the Romanian Area: Historical Perspectives (XVIII-XX Centuries)
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Ethno-Confessional Realities in the Romanian Area: Historical Perspectives (XVIII-XX centuries) Brie, Mircea and Şipoş, Sorin and Horga, Ioan University of Oradea, Romania 2011 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/44026/ MPRA Paper No. 44026, posted 30 Jan 2013 09:17 UTC ETHNO-CONFESSIONAL REALITIES IN THE ROMANIAN AREA: HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES (XVIII-XX CENTURIES) ETHNO-CONFESSIONAL REALITIES IN THE ROMANIAN AREA: HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES (XVIII-XX CENTURIES) Mircea BRIE Sorin ŞIPOŞ Ioan HORGA (Coordinators) Foreword by Barbu ŞTEFĂNESCU Oradea 2011 This present volume contains the papers of the international conference Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union’s East Border (workshop: Ethno-Confessional Realities in the Romanian Area: Historical Perspectives), held in Oradea between 2nd-5th of June 2011. This international conference, organized by Institute for Euroregional Studies Oradea-Debrecen, University of Oradea and Department of International Relations and European Studies, with the support of the European Commission and Bihor County Council, was an event run within the project of Action Jean Monnet Programme of the European Commission n. 176197-LLP-1- 2010-1-RO-AJM-MO CONTENTS Barbu ŞTEFĂNESCU Foreword ................................................................................................................ 7 CONFESSION AND CONFESSIONAL MINORITIES Barbu ŞTEFĂNESCU Confessionalisation and Community Sociability (Transylvania, 18th Century – First Half of the
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions to the Knowledge of the Herpetofauna of Southern Dobruja (Romania)"
    Travaux du Musturn National dlHistoire Naturelle Vol. XLIV pp. 357-373 0 2002 ((GrigoreAntipau CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE HERPETOFAUNA OF SOUTHERN DOBRUJA (ROMANIA)" MIRCEA-DRAGOMIR ANDRE1 Abstract. The author updates the knowledge on the herpetofauna of southern Dobruja according to his own studies within the area, during 1993-1998, when he identified 18 taxa. They represent 37.5% of the total amphibian and reptile species from Romania. Also the author makes some remarks on respective ecosystems and on the urgent protection need of some species. Resume. L'auteur met au courant les connaissances concernant la herpttofaune du sud de la Dobrogea, se basant sur ses propres recherches entreprises en cette zone durant la periode 1993-1998, grdce auquelles il y a identifie 18 taxons. Ceux-ci representent 37,5 % du total des esptces d'amphibiens et de reptiles de Roumanie. 11 fait aussi quelques commentaires sur les ecosysttmes respectifs ainsi que sur la nCcessitC stringente de protkger certaines especes. Key words: southern Dobrouja, ecological factors, herpetofauna, protection. From the older specialized literature, summarized in the two fascicles of fauna Fuhn (1960) and Fuhn & Vancea (1961) it results that most of the data on the amphibian and reptile species, whose presence was doubtfil in central and southern Dobruja, are absent. The Danube Delta and the littoral area of the Black Sea were better studied. An interesting paper on the presence of the lizard Lacerta praticola pontica Lantz et Cyren in southern Dobruja is published
    [Show full text]
  • 'A New Greater Romania'? Romanian Claims to the Serbian Banat in 19411
    Central Europe, Vol. 3, No. 2, November 2005 ‘A NEW GREATER ROMANIA’? ROMANIAN CLAIMS TO THE SERBIAN BANAT IN 19411 Rebecca Ann Haynes University College London, School of Slavonic and East European Studies Introduction On the morning of April 6 1941 the Germans launched a Blitzkrieg attack on the kingdom of Yugoslavia. Within a week Belgrade had surrendered and the dismemberment of Yugoslavia began. Amongst the spoils of war was the Serbian (or Yugoslav) Banat. This was the western portion of the Banat (historically known as the Banat of Temesvár), relinquished by Hungary under the terms of the Treaty of Trianon in 1920. The Serbian Banat quickly became the object of rival territorial claims by the Reich’s Romanian and Hungarian allies. This article will argue that the Romanian government lay claim to the region, encouraged by growing nationalist sentiment both within Romania and in the Serbian Banat itself. It will further be argued that, whereas in the past the Romanian government had justified the possession of Romanian territory with reference to the Paris peace treaties and international law, the claim to the Serbian Banat represented the beginning of a policy which sought to justify the expan- sion of Romania on the basis of the ethnic principle. After all, the Serbian Banat had never been part of the Romanian state or of the Romanian principalities. Romanian foreign-policy makers were no longer concerned merely with protecting the country’s territorial integrity or with attempts to regain the territories lost in 1940 to the Soviet Union, Hungary and Bulgaria. The concept of a Romania based on the legality of the Paris peace treaties, as conceived of by Romanian foreign-policy makers in the 1920s and 1930s, was thus jettisoned in favour of ethnic expansionism.
    [Show full text]
  • Declaration of War by Bulgaria Against Romania on 1 September 1916. Turtucaia and Its Impact on Romanian Military Leadership
    SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND EDUCATION IN THE AIR FORCE-AFASES 2016 DECLARATION OF WAR BY BULGARIA AGAINST ROMANIA ON 1 SEPTEMBER 1916. TURTUCAIA AND ITS IMPACT ON ROMANIAN MILITARY LEADERSHIP Silviu-Daniel NICULAE The Centre for Euro-Atlantic Studies, the University of Bucharest ([email protected]) DOI: 10.19062/2247-3173.2016.18.2.20 Abstract: The article presents some aspects related to the circumstances in which Romania entered the First World War in 1916. It is shown that in the geopolitical context existing at the time Romania had to cope with the difficult situation of being at war on two fronts and against four actors – Germany, Austria- Hungary, Bulgaria and Turkey. Moreover, the impact of the defeat at Turtucaia, especially on Romanian military leadership, is briefly analyzed. Keywords: First World War; Turtucaia; Central Powers; Entente; Southern Dobruja; Transylvania; offensive; defensive 1. INTRODUCTION Following the Entente complex diplomatic efforts, in the unstable geopolitical context existing between 1914 and 1916, Romania decided to enter the war alongside the Entente powers. Romania’s readiness to enter the war was the result of recognition by the Treaty of 17 August 1916 of the legitimate right of Romania over Transylvania and all the territories inhabited by the Romanians ruled by Austria-Hungary. Moreover, the Alliance Treaty between Romania and Russia, France, Great Britain and Italy, concluded on 17 August 1916, guaranteed Romania’s territorial integrity, including stipulations with regard to the territories in Austria-Hungary – Transylvania, Crişana, Maramureş, Banat and Bucovina – that were to become part of Romania following the victory of the Entente [4, p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of the Appurtenance of Dobruja Region, 1913-1940
    The problem of the appurtenance of Dobruja region, 1913-1940: Bulgarian and Romanian methods of claiming rights over the territory By Ana-Teodora Kurkina Submitted to Central European University History Department In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Professor Balazs Trencsenyi Second Reader: Professor Constantin Iordachi CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2013 i Copyright of the text of the thesis remains with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, can be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page should form a part of any such copies made. Further copies made in accordance with these instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author. CEU eTD Collection ii Abstract The focus of the current thesis is the evaluation of the propaganda strategies employed by the Romanian and the Bulgarian side in justifying their claims over Dobruja region in 1913-1940. The Dobrujan question, first emerging after the signing of the Treaty of Berlin in 1878, became a vital issue in the Romanian-Bulgarian relations once again after the second Balkan war and the Romanian occupation of the Southern part of the region, Cadrilater. A territorial exchange that followed transformed the province into the playground for the Bulgarian and Romanian nationalistic propaganda, featuring the competing state and nation-building projects, modernization programs and legitimization of the territorial rights. In the research, the process of claiming the rights is seen through the texts produced by the participants of the territorial debate from both sides.
    [Show full text]
  • The Demography of Romanians in Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina
    Jan WENDT University of Gdańsk, POLAND THE DEMOGRAPHY OF ROMANIANS IN BESSARABIA AND NORTHERN BUKOVINA Due to certain circumstances a number of Romanians live outside the present national boundaries of the Romanian State. While the history has the duty to point out and to explain the factors determining the situation changing in time, political geography and demography has the duty to seize this process and to stress the role played by the demographic factors. The study of other problems, such as cultural models, can not be undertaken without the help of psychological and sociological science. Since the main characteristics identifying a nation are nationality and mother tongue, the involvement of linguistics is needed in this approach. The conclusion is that this kind of study implies necessarily the interdisciplinary co-operation between different sciences, as demography, political geography, linguistics, anthropography, ethnology and political sciences. The Romanians who lived outside the national frontiers in Moldavia, Ukraine and the Balkan Peninsula represented native populations. First of all one problem must be enlightened. The problem refers to the population censuses from the last century as main information sources. The registered characteristics are citizenship, nationality, ethnic origin, mother tongue, language and religion. However in many cases the data do not reflect the reality, except the cases when the population is obliged by the authorities to declare themselves as members of the majority nation. The national question in Romania, because of its complicated structure, has always captured the interest of geographers in the last century. Especially that Bessarabia and north Bukovina were a taboo subject for the last fifty years.
    [Show full text]