Sterile Neutrinos S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sterile Neutrinos S LIGHT EXTENDED NEUTRINO SECTORS: FOUNDATIONS AND PHENOMENOLOGY MINI-WORKSHOP ON NEUTRINO THEORY SEPTEMBER 22, 2O2O BIBHUSHAN SHAKYA REFERENCES Neutrino masses and sterile neutrino dark matter from the PeV scale S. B. Roland, B. Shakya, J. D. Wells, 1412.4791 PeV neutrinos and a 3.5 keV X-ray line from a PeV scale supersymmetric neutrino sector S. B. Roland, B. Shakya, J. D. Wells, 1506.08195 Sterile neutrino dark matter from freeze-in B. Shakya, 1512.02751 Cosmological imprints of frozen-in light sterile neutrinos S. B. Roland, B. Shakya, 1609.06739 Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter with Supersymmetry B. Shakya, J. D. Wells, 1611.01517 Exotic Sterile Neutrinos and Pseudo-Goldstone Phenomenology B. Shakya, J. D. Wells, 1801.02640 … 2 PARAMETER SPACE FOR STERILE NEUTRINOS from Roland, Shakya, Wells, 1412.4791 [hep-ph] 3 PARAMETER SPACE FOR STERILE NEUTRINOS Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter: X-ray + Lyman-alpha rule out DM from Dodelson-Widrow (DW) production from Roland, Shakya, Wells, 1412.4791 [hep-ph] need alternate mechanism, e.g. freeze-in, that does not need active- Abazajian, 1705.01837 sterile mixing 4 PARAMETER SPACE FOR STERILE NEUTRINOS Direct Searches rely on decay channels+lifetime dictated by active-sterile mixing from 1504.04855 5 NEED FOR “NEW” PHYSICS IN THE NEUTRINO SECTOR (WITH LIGHT STERILE NEUTRINOS) “unnatural” parameters in the (sterile) neutrino sector: • < GeV scale masses for sterile neutrinos • tiny Yukawa couplings ( y < 10-7 ) • production of sterile neutrino DM beyond DW Hints of an underlying structure? additional structure? new particles? new symmetries? novel phenomenology? 6 Exotic Signals in the Sterile Neutrino Sector Exotic SignalsPreliminary in notes the on Sterile the phenomenology Neutrino associated Sector with a light pseudo-Goldstone from a broken global U(1)0 (unrelated to lepton number) in the neutrino sector. Preliminary notes on the phenomenology associated with a light pseudo-Goldstone from a broken global U(1)0 (unrelated to lepton number) in the neutrino sector. MOTIVATION The U(1)B L is appealing but by no means the only Exotic Signals in the Sterile Neutrino Sector − possibility. We consider instead a global symmetry U(1)0 Preliminary notes on the phenomenology associated with a light pseudo-Goldstone from a broken MOTIVATIONLight sterile neutrinos below the electroweakThe U(1)B scaleL is are appealingthat the butN byi (but no means none of the the only SM fields) are charged un- global U(1)0 (unrelated to lepton number) in the neutrino sector. − well motivated by many argumentspossibility. (dark matter, We lepto- consider insteadder. This a global forbids symmetry the DiracU(1) as0 well as Majorana mass terms in the above equations. However, with an oppo- Light sterile neutrinosgenesis below the etc) electroweak and are being scale searched are that for the at aN varietyi (but none of of the SM fields) are charged un- MOTIVATION The U(1)B L is appealing but by no means the only experiments. The searches are performedder. This in− the forbids tradi- the Diracsitely as charged well asφ Majorana, we can write mass down the higher dimen- well motivated by many arguments (dark matter, lepto- possibility. We consider instead a global symmetry U(1) tional decay channels induced by theterms mixing in of the the above active equations.sional operator However, with0 an oppo- genesis etc)Light and sterile are neutrinos being searched below the forelectroweak at a variety scale are of that the Ni (but none of the SM fields) are charged un- and sterile sectors as dictated by the seesaw mechanism. experiments.well motivated The searches by many are arguments performed (dark matter, in the lepto- tradi- der.sitely This charged forbids theφ, we Dirac can as write well as down Majorana the higher mass dimen-1 However, the natural mass scale oftermssional Majorana in theoperator above neutrinos equations. However, with an oppo- LhNφ (3) tional decaygenesis channels etc) and induced are being by searched the mixing for at of a the variety active of L ⊃ ⇤ and sterileexperiments. sectors as The dictated searchesis at the by are UVthe performed seesaw cuto↵ scale in mechanism. the (GUT tradi- or Planck),sitely charged so ifφ they, we can are write down the higher dimen- sional operator 1 However,tional the decay natural channels masslight, induced scale this by of is the Majorana indicative mixing of neutrinos the of active some deeper structure in the which,LhN onceφ φ gets a vev, reproduces(3) the Dirac mass term. and sterile sectors as dictated by the seesaw mechanism. sterile neutrino sectors, such as some protecting symme- 1L ⊃Here⇤ ⇤ is some UV-cuto↵ scale. To keep things general, is at theHowever, UV cuto the↵ naturalscale (GUT mass scale or Planck), of Majorana so if neutrinos they are LhNφ (3) try that keeps their masses at a low scale. This structure ⇤ light, thisis at is the indicative UV cuto↵ scale of some (GUT deeper or Planck), structure so if they in are the which, once φ getsL a⊃ vev,we reproduces do not explicitly the Dirac write mass down term. a term that gives rise to sterile neutrinolight, this sectors, is indicative suchcan of also as some some give deeper protecting rise structure to other symme- in light the degreeswhich,Here of once⇤ freedomisφ somegets a in vev, UV-cuto the reproduces↵thescale. Majorana the Dirac To keep mass mass things term. term, general, and take the sterile neutrino try thatsterile keeps neutrino their masses sectors,neutrino at such a low as sector, some scale. protecting and This consequently structure symme- newHerewe decay⇤ dois not some channels explicitly UV-cuto for↵ writescale.mass down To keepM ato things term be that general, a free gives parameter rise to instead. Spontaneous can alsotry give that rise keeps to their other massessterile light at neutrinos, degrees a low scale. of whichfreedom This structure can in completely the we do change not explicitly their write phe- downbreaking a term that of the givesU rise(1)0 towith φ gives rise to a light pseudo- the Majorana mass term, and take the sterile neutrinoh i neutrinocan sector, also give and rise consequently to othernomenology. light new degrees We decay of would freedom channels like in theto for studythemass this Majorana possibility.M to mass be a term, free and parameterGoldstone take the sterile instead.⇢, which neutrino Spontaneous inherits the couplings of φ; its mass neutrino sector, and consequently new decay channels for mass M to be a free parameter instead. Spontaneous sterile neutrinos, which canMotivate completely from change hidden their sectors. phe- Even if GUT scale see- depends on details of the underlying model (explicit soft sterile neutrinos, which can completely change their phe- breakingbreaking of the ofU the(1)Uwith(1)0 withφ givesφ risegives to a rise light to pseudo- a light pseudo- saw, if neutrino-like fields in hidden sectors exist,0 inte- term,h i or from quantum gravity), but for generality we nomenology.nomenology. We would We would like like to study to study this this possibility. possibility. GoldstoneGoldstone⇢, which⇢, which inherits inheritsh i the couplings the couplings of φ; its mass of φ; its mass grating out the GUT scale neutrinos generates a low en- MotivateWHYMotivate fromARE hidden from STERILE hidden sectors. sectors. Even NEUTRINOS Even if if GUT GUT scale scale see- see- LIGHT?dependsdepends on details on details of the of underlying thealso underlying take model this (explicit model mass soft (explicitm⇢ to be soft a free parameter. saw, ifsaw, neutrino-like if neutrino-like fieldsergy fields in e hidden in↵ective hidden sectors seesaw! sectors exist, exist, Plausible inte- inte- toterm, haveterm, additionalor or from from quantum struc- quantum gravity), gravity), but for but generality for generality we we grating out the GUTture scale there. neutrinos generates a low en- also take this mass m to be a free parameter. grating out the GUT scale neutrinos generates a low en- also take this mass⇢ m⇢ to be a free parameter. ergy e↵ergyective e↵ective seesaw! seesaw! Plausible Plausible to to have have additional additional struc- struc- PHENOMENOLOGY Whyture there. are the active (Standard Model) neutrinos light? ture there. PHENOMENOLOGY FRAMEWORK PHENOMENOLOGYThe phenomenology depends on four free parame- 1. symmetry protectionFRAMEWORK The phenomenology dependsters: on fourφ , ⇤ free,m parame-⇢,M (other phenomenologically relevant FRAMEWORKThe operators traditionally associated with right- h i 2. mass partner is a singlet ters:Theφ , ⇤ phenomenology,m⇢,M (other phenomenologically dependsparameters on are four relevantmφ freeand parame- its mixing with the SM Higgs, The operators traditionallyhanded, sterile associated neutrinos with right- are theparameters Dirach i and are Majoranam and its mixing with the SM Higgs, ters: φ , ⇤,mφ ⇢,M (otherbut phenomenologically these are only tangentially relevant relevant to neutrino phe- handed, sterile neutrinos are the Dirac and Majorana but theseh arei only tangentially relevant to neutrino phe- The operators traditionallymasses:y associated with right- parameters are m andnomenology its mixing with and wethe ignore SM Higgs, these for now). masses: ν<h> N nomenology and we ignoreφ these for now). handed, sterile neutrinos are the Dirac and Majorana ¯butc these are only tangentiallyIf m⇢ relevant<M, we to have neutrino a new, phe- “exotic” decay channel for ¯ c yijLihNj + MiNIfi Nmi⇢.<M, we have(1) a new, “exotic” decay channel for masses: yijLihNj + MiNi Ni. (1) the sterile neutrino into the pseudo-Goldstone and an L ⊃ L ⊃ thenomenology sterile neutrino and into we ignore the pseudo-Goldstone these for now). and an When M y h , this setup giveactive riseIf neutrino,m to<M the, familiarN we have⇢⌫. This aactive new, has “exotic” a neutrino, decay width decayN (as- channel⇢⌫. This for has a decay width (as- When M y h , this setup give¯ c rise to the familiar ⇢ ! ! yhijiLihNj + MiNi Nih.
Recommended publications
  • Naturally Light Sterile Neutrinos in Gauge Mediated Supersymmetry
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server hep-ph/9810257 IC/98/163 WIS-98/25/Oct-DPP Naturally Light Sterile Neutrinos in Gauge Mediated Sup ersymmetry Breaking a b Gia Dvali and Yosef Nir a ICTP, Trieste, 34100, Italy b Department of Particle Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel Mo duli are generic in string (M) theory. In a large class of gauge-mediated Sup ersymmetry breaking mo dels, the fermionic comp onents of such elds havevery light masses, around the eV scale, and non-negligible mixing with 4 active neutrinos, of order 10 . Consequently, these fermions could play the role of sterile neutrinos to which active neutrinos oscillate, thus a ecting measurements of solar neutrinos or of atmospheric neutrinos. They could also provide warm dark matter, thus a ecting structure formation. 10/98 1. Intro duction Light sterile neutrinos are o ccasionally invoked by theorists to explain various hints of neutrino masses which cannot b e accommo dated in a framework of only three light active neutrinos (see e.g. refs. [1-26]). There are, however, three puzzles related to the hyp othesis that light sterile neutrinos may play a role in various observations: (i) The Ma jorana mass term of a sterile neutrino is not protected byany Standard Mo del (SM) gauge symmetry and can, therefore, be arbitrarily large. The mass that is relevant to the various exp eriments is at or b elow the eV scale. (ii) The Dirac mass term that mixes a sterile neutrino with an active one is protected by the electroweak breaking scale and is exp ected to b e in the range m m .
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:Astro-Ph/0010112 V2 10 Apr 2001
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server NYU-TH-00/09/05 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 14/09/00 NEUTRON STARS WITH A STABLE, LIGHT SUPERSYMMETRIC BARYON SHMUEL BALBERG1,GLENNYS R. FARRAR2 AND TSVI PIRAN3 NYU-TH-00/09/05 ABSTRACT ¼ If a light gluino exists, the lightest gluino-containing baryon, the Ë , is a possible candidate for self-interacting ¼ ª =ª 6 ½¼ Ñ dÑ b dark matter. In this scenario, the simplest explanation for the observed ratio is that Ë ¼ ¾ Ë 9¼¼ MeVc ; this is not at present excluded by particle physics. Such an could be present in neutron stars, with hyperon formation serving as an intermediate stage. We calculate equilibrium compositions and equation of ¼ state for high density matter with the Ë , and find that for a wide range of parameters the properties of neutron ¼ stars with the Ë are consistent with observations. In particular, the maximum mass of a nonrotating star is ¼ ½:7 ½:8 Å Ë ¬ , and the presence of the is helpful in reconciling observed cooling rates with hyperon formation. Subject headings: dark matter–dense matter–elementary particles–equation of state–stars: neutron 1. INTRODUCTION also Farrar & Gabadadze (2000) and references therein. The lightest supersymmetric “Ê-hadrons” are the spin-1/2 The interiors of neutron stars offer a unique meeting point ¼ gg Ê ~ bound state ( or glueballino) and the spin-0 baryon between astrophysics on one hand and nuclear and particle ¼ ¼ g~ Ë Ë Ùd× bound state, the .The is thus a boson with baryon physics on the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Phenomenology of Gev-Scale Heavy Neutral Leptons Arxiv:1805.08567
    Prepared for submission to JHEP INR-TH-2018-014 Phenomenology of GeV-scale Heavy Neutral Leptons Kyrylo Bondarenko,1 Alexey Boyarsky,1 Dmitry Gorbunov,2;3 Oleg Ruchayskiy4 1Intituut-Lorentz, Leiden University, Niels Bohrweg 2, 2333 CA Leiden, The Netherlands 2Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 117312, Russia 3Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny 141700, Russia 4Discovery Center, Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen University, Blegdamsvej 17, DK- 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: We review and revise phenomenology of the GeV-scale heavy neutral leptons (HNLs). We extend the previous analyses by including more channels of HNLs production and decay and provide with more refined treatment, including QCD corrections for the HNLs of masses (1) GeV. We summarize the relevance O of individual production and decay channels for different masses, resolving a few discrepancies in the literature. Our final results are directly suitable for sensitivity studies of particle physics experiments (ranging from proton beam-dump to the LHC) aiming at searches for heavy neutral leptons. arXiv:1805.08567v3 [hep-ph] 9 Nov 2018 ArXiv ePrint: 1805.08567 Contents 1 Introduction: heavy neutral leptons1 1.1 General introduction to heavy neutral leptons2 2 HNL production in proton fixed target experiments3 2.1 Production from hadrons3 2.1.1 Production from light unflavored and strange mesons5 2.1.2
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Supersymmetry
    Introduction to Supersymmetry Pre-SUSY Summer School Corpus Christi, Texas May 15-18, 2019 Stephen P. Martin Northern Illinois University [email protected] 1 Topics: Why: Motivation for supersymmetry (SUSY) • What: SUSY Lagrangians, SUSY breaking and the Minimal • Supersymmetric Standard Model, superpartner decays Who: Sorry, not covered. • For some more details and a slightly better attempt at proper referencing: A supersymmetry primer, hep-ph/9709356, version 7, January 2016 • TASI 2011 lectures notes: two-component fermion notation and • supersymmetry, arXiv:1205.4076. If you find corrections, please do let me know! 2 Lecture 1: Motivation and Introduction to Supersymmetry Motivation: The Hierarchy Problem • Supermultiplets • Particle content of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model • (MSSM) Need for “soft” breaking of supersymmetry • The Wess-Zumino Model • 3 People have cited many reasons why extensions of the Standard Model might involve supersymmetry (SUSY). Some of them are: A possible cold dark matter particle • A light Higgs boson, M = 125 GeV • h Unification of gauge couplings • Mathematical elegance, beauty • ⋆ “What does that even mean? No such thing!” – Some modern pundits ⋆ “We beg to differ.” – Einstein, Dirac, . However, for me, the single compelling reason is: The Hierarchy Problem • 4 An analogy: Coulomb self-energy correction to the electron’s mass A point-like electron would have an infinite classical electrostatic energy. Instead, suppose the electron is a solid sphere of uniform charge density and radius R. An undergraduate problem gives: 3e2 ∆ECoulomb = 20πǫ0R 2 Interpreting this as a correction ∆me = ∆ECoulomb/c to the electron mass: 15 0.86 10− meters m = m + (1 MeV/c2) × .
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Standard Model
    Beyond the Standard Model Mihoko M. Nojiri Theory Center, IPNS, KEK, Tsukuba, Japan, and Kavli IPMU, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan Abstract A Brief review on the physics beyond the Standard Model. 1 Quest of BSM Although the standard model of elementary particles(SM) describes the high energy phenomena very well, particle physicists have been attracted by the physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM). There are very good reasons about this; 1. The SM Higgs sector is not natural. 2. There is no dark matter candidate in the SM. 3. Origin of three gauge interactions is not understood in the SM. 4. Cosmological observations suggest an inflation period in the early universe. The non-zero baryon number of our universe is not consistent with the inflation picture unless a new interaction is introduced. The Higgs boson candidate was discovered recently. The study of the Higgs boson nature is extremely important for the BSM study. The Higgs boson is a spin 0 particle, and the structure of the radiative correction is quite different from those of fermions and gauge bosons. The correction of the Higgs boson mass is proportional to the cut-off scale, called “quadratic divergence". If the cut-off scale is high, the correction becomes unacceptably large compared with the on-shell mass of the Higgs boson. This is often called a “fine turning problem". Note that such quadratic divergence does not appear in the radiative correction to the fermion and gauge boson masses. They are protected by the chiral and gauge symmetries, respectively. The problem can be solved if there are an intermediate scale where new particles appears, and the radiative correction from the new particles compensates the SM radiative correction.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1801.08947V2 [Hep-Ph] 24 May 2018
    UCI-TR-2017-18 Heavy Neutral Leptons at FASER Felix Kling1, ∗ and Sebastian Trojanowski1, 2, y 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-4575 USA 2National Centre for Nuclear Research, Ho_za 69, 00-681 Warsaw, Poland Abstract We study the prospects for discovering heavy neutral leptons at ForwArd Search ExpeRiment, or FASER, the newly proposed detector at the LHC. Previous studies showed that a relatively small 2 detector with ∼ 10 m length and . 1 m cross sectional area can probe large unconstrained parts of parameter space for dark photons and dark Higgs bosons. In this work we show that FASER will also be sensitive to heavy neutral leptons that have mixing angles with the active neutrinos that are up to an order of magnitude lower than current bounds. In particular, this is true for heavy neutral leptons produced dominantly in B-meson decays, in which case FASER's discovery potential is comparable to the proposed SHiP detector. We also illustrate how the search for heavy neutral leptons at FASER will be complementary to ongoing searches in high-pT experiments at the LHC and can shed light on the nature of dark matter and the process of baryogenesis in the early Universe. arXiv:1801.08947v2 [hep-ph] 24 May 2018 ∗Electronic address: [email protected] yElectronic address: [email protected] 1 I. INTRODUCTION In the past years, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) has collected an impressive amount of data and placed constraints on a multitude of models for new physics. Most of these searches are targeting high-pT signatures corresponding to new strongly interacting heavy particles.
    [Show full text]
  • Topics in Physics Beyond the Standard Model Phd Thesis
    Topics in Physics Beyond the Standard Model PhD Thesis Andrea Caputo IFIC - Universitat de València - CSIC Departamento de Física Teórica Programa de Doctorado en Física Under the supervision of Pilar Hernandez Gamazo Valencia, Julio 2020 Pilar Hernández Gamazo, catedrática del Departamento de Física Teórica de la Universidad de Valencia, Certifica: Que la presente memoria, ”Topics in physics Beyond The Standard Model” ,ha sido realizada bajo su dirección en el Instituto de Física Corpuscular, centro mixto de la Universidad de Valencia y del CSIC, por Andrea Caputo, y constituye su Tesis para optar al grado de Doctor en Ciencias Físicas. Y para que así conste, en cumplimiento de la legislación vigente, presenta en el Departamento de Física Teórica de la Universidad de Valencia la referida Tesis Doctoral, y firman el presente certificado. Valencia, Julio 2020 Pilar Hernández Gamazo List of Publications This PhD thesis is based on the following publications: • The seesaw path to leptonic CP violation [1] Caputo, A. and Hernandez, P. and Kekic, M. and Lopez-Pavon, J. and Salvado, J. Eur. Phys. J. C77 (2017) no.4, 258,[1611.05000]. • The seesaw portal in testable models of neutrino masses [2] Caputo, A. and Hernandez,P. and Lopez-Pavon, J. and Salvado, J. JHEP 1706 (2017) 112,[1704.08721]. • Looking for Axion Dark Matter in Dwarf Spheroidals [3] Caputo, A. and Garay, C. P and Witte, S.J. Phys.Rev. D 98 (2018) no.8, 083024,[1805.08780]. • Leptogenesis from oscillations and dark matter [4] Caputo, A. and Hernandez, P. and Rius, N. Eur.Phys.J. C 79 (2019) no.7, 574,[1807.03309].
    [Show full text]
  • Supersymmetry: What? Why? When?
    Contemporary Physics, 2000, volume41, number6, pages359± 367 Supersymmetry:what? why? when? GORDON L. KANE This article is acolloquium-level review of the idea of supersymmetry and why so many physicists expect it to soon be amajor discovery in particle physics. Supersymmetry is the hypothesis, for which there is indirect evidence, that the underlying laws of nature are symmetric between matter particles (fermions) such as electrons and quarks, and force particles (bosons) such as photons and gluons. 1. Introduction (B) In addition, there are anumber of questions we The Standard Model of particle physics [1] is aremarkably hope will be answered: successful description of the basic constituents of matter (i) Can the forces of nature be uni® ed and (quarks and leptons), and of the interactions (weak, simpli® ed so wedo not have four indepen- electromagnetic, and strong) that lead to the structure dent ones? and complexity of our world (when combined with gravity). (ii) Why is the symmetry group of the Standard It is afull relativistic quantum ®eld theory. It is now very Model SU(3) ´SU(2) ´U(1)? well tested and established. Many experiments con® rmits (iii) Why are there three families of quarks and predictions and none disagree with them. leptons? Nevertheless, weexpect the Standard Model to be (iv) Why do the quarks and leptons have the extendedÐ not wrong, but extended, much as Maxwell’s masses they do? equation are extended to be apart of the Standard Model. (v) Can wehave aquantum theory of gravity? There are two sorts of reasons why weexpect the Standard (vi) Why is the cosmological constant much Model to be extended.
    [Show full text]
  • Supersymmetry Min Raj Lamsal Department of Physics, Prithvi Narayan Campus, Pokhara Min [email protected]
    Supersymmetry Min Raj Lamsal Department of Physics, Prithvi Narayan Campus, Pokhara [email protected] Abstract : This article deals with the introduction of supersymmetry as the latest and most emerging burning issue for the explanation of nature including elementary particles as well as the universe. Supersymmetry is a conjectured symmetry of space and time. It has been a very popular idea among theoretical physicists. It is nearly an article of faith among elementary-particle physicists that the four fundamental physical forces in nature ultimately derive from a single force. For years scientists have tried to construct a Grand Unified Theory showing this basic unity. Physicists have already unified the electron-magnetic and weak forces in an 'electroweak' theory, and recent work has focused on trying to include the strong force. Gravity is much harder to handle, but work continues on that, as well. In the world of everyday experience, the strengths of the forces are very different, leading physicists to conclude that their convergence could occur only at very high energies, such as those existing in the earliest moments of the universe, just after the Big Bang. Keywords: standard model, grand unified theories, theory of everything, superpartner, higgs boson, neutrino oscillation. 1. INTRODUCTION unifies the weak and electromagnetic forces. The What is the world made of? What are the most basic idea is that the mass difference between photons fundamental constituents of matter? We still do not having zero mass and the weak bosons makes the have anything that could be a final answer, but we electromagnetic and weak interactions behave quite have come a long way.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Sterile Neutrinos in Lepton Flavour Violating Processes
    Valentina De Romeri UAM/IFT Madrid Impact of sterile neutrinos in lepton flavour violating processes based on JHEP 1504 (2015) 051 and JHEP 1602 (2016) 083 done in collaboration with Asmaa Abada2 and Ana Teixeira1 1) Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire Clermont-Ferrand 2) Laboratoire de Physique Theorique, Orsay 1 Valentina De Romeri - UAM/IFT Madrid Lepton flavour violation and new physics ‣ By construction, lepton flavour violation (LFV) is forbidden in the SM (Strict conservation of total lepton number (L) and lepton flavours (Li))" ! !BUT … neutral lepton flavour is violated through neutrino oscillations! (solar, atmospheric, reactor neutrino data)" ! !Flavour violation in the charged lepton sector: NEW PHYSICS beyond SMm# (SM with UPMNS)!" ! !Are neutral and charged LFV (cLFV) related?$ Does cLFV arise from #-mass mechanism? " ! !We will focus on the study of cLFV signals arising in minimal extensions of the SM by sterile fermion states 2 Valentina De Romeri - UAM/IFT Madrid Beyond the 3-neutrino paradigm: Sterile neutrinos ! From the invisible decay width of the Z boson [LEP]:" ⇒ extra neutrinos must be sterile (=EW singlets) or cannot be a Z decay product" Any singlet fermion that mixes with the SM neutrinos" ● Right-handed neutrinos ● Other singlet fermions" ! !Sterile neutrinos are SM gauge singlets - colourless, no weak interactions, electrically neutral. Interactions with SM fields: through mixings with active neutrinos (via Higgs)" !No bound on the number of sterile states, no limit on their mass scale(s)" !Phenomenological interest (dependent on the mass scale): 3 Valentina De Romeri - UAM/IFT Madrid Beyond the 3-neutrino paradigm: Sterile neutrinos ! From the invisible decay width of the Z boson [LEP]:" ⇒ extra neutrinos must be sterile (=EW singlets) or cannot be a Z decay product" Any singlet fermion that mixes with the SM neutrinos" ● Right-handed neutrinos ● Other singlet fermions" ! !Sterile neutrinos are SM gauge singlets - colourless, no weak interactions, electrically neutral.
    [Show full text]
  • Super Symmetry
    MILESTONES DOI: 10.1038/nphys868 M iles Tone 1 3 Super symmetry The way that spin is woven into the in 1015. However, a form of symmetry very fabric of the Universe is writ between fermions and bosons called large in the standard model of supersymmetry offers a much more particle physics. In this model, which elegant solution because the took shape in the 1970s and can quantum fluctuations caused by explain the results of all particle- bosons are naturally cancelled physics experiments to date, matter out by those caused by fermions and (and antimatter) is made of three vice versa. families of quarks and leptons, which Symmetry plays a central role in are all fermions, whereas the physics. The fact that the laws of electromagnetic, strong physics are, for instance, symmetric in and weak forces that act on these time (that is, they do not change with particles are carried by other time) leads to the conservation of particles, such as photons and gluons, energy. These laws are also symmetric The ATLAS experiment under construction at the which are all bosons. with respect to space, rotation and Large Hadron Collider. Image courtesy of CERN. Despite its success, the standard relative motion. Initially explored in model is unsatisfactory for a number the early 1970s, supersymmetry is a of reasons. First, although the less obvious kind of symmetry, which, graviton. Searching for electromagnetic and weak forces if it exists in nature, would mean that supersymmetric particles will be a have been unified into a single force, the laws of physics do not change priority when the Large Hadron a ‘grand unified theory’ that brings when bosons are replaced by Collider comes into operation at the strong interaction into the fold fermions, and fermions are replaced CERN, the European particle-physics remains elusive.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Universe
    QUANTUM UNIVERSE THE REVOLUTION IN 21ST CENTURY PARTICLE PHYSICS DOE / NSF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS ADVISORY PANEL QUANTUM UNIVERSE COMMITTEE QUANTUM UNIVERSE THE REVOLUTION IN 21ST CENTURY PARTICLE PHYSICS What does “Quantum Universe” mean? To discover what the universe is made of and how it works is the challenge of particle physics. Quantum Universe presents the quest to explain the universe in terms of quantum physics, which governs the behavior of the microscopic, subatomic world. It describes a revolution in particle physics and a quantum leap in our understanding of the mystery and beauty of the universe. DOE / NSF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS ADVISORY PANEL QUANTUM UNIVERSE COMMITTEE QUANTUM UNIVERSE CONTENTS COMMITTEE MEMBERS ANDREAS ALBRECHT EDWARD KOLB CONTENTS University of California at Davis Fermilab University of Chicago SAMUEL ARONSON Brookhaven National Laboratory JOSEPH LYKKEN Fermilab iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY KEITH BAKER Hampton University HITOSHI MURAYAMA 1 I INTRODUCTION Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton University of California, Berkeley 2 II THE FUNDAMENTAL NATURE OF JONATHAN BAGGER MATTER, ENERGY, SPACE AND TIME Johns Hopkins University HAMISH ROBERTSON University of Washington 4 EINSTEIN’S DREAM OF UNIFIED FORCES NEIL CALDER Stanford Linear Accelerator Center JAMES SIEGRIST 10 THE PARTICLE WORLD Stanford University Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University of California, Berkeley 15 THE BIRTH OF THE UNIVERSE PERSIS DRELL, CHAIR Stanford Linear Accelerator Center SIMON
    [Show full text]