DOCSLIB.ORG

158 Subpart X—Phytophthora Ramorum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
158 Subpart X—Phytophthora Ramorum § 301.91–8 7 CFR Ch. III (1–1–20 Edition) to comply with the requirements of or any other nursery stock except in this subpart. accordance with this subpart. 1 (b) No person may move interstate [49 FR 18992, May 4, 1984, as amended at 59 from any regulated establishment any FR 67609, Dec. 30, 1994] regulated, restricted, or associated ar- ticles except in accordance with this § 301.91–8 Attachment and disposition of certificates and limited permits. subpart. (c) No person may move interstate (a) A certificate or limited permit re- from any quarantined area or regulated quired for the interstate movement of establishment any regulated restricted, a regulated article, at all times during or associated article or nursery stock such movement, shall be securely at- that has been tested with a test ap- tached to the outside of the containers proved by APHIS and found infected containing the regulated article, se- with Phytophthora ramorum, or that is curely attached to the article itself if part of a plant that was found infected not in a container, or securely at- with Phytophthora ramorum, unless tached to the consignee’s copy of the such movement is in accordance with accompanying waybill or other ship- part 330 of this chapter. ping document; Provided, however, That [72 FR 8597, Feb. 27, 2007, as amended at 84 the requirements of this section may FR 16192, Apr. 18, 2019] be met by attaching the certificate or limited permit to the consignee’s copy § 301.92–1 Definitions. of the waybill or other shipping docu- Administrator. The Administrator, ments only if the regulated article is Animal and Plant Health Inspection sufficiently described on the certifi- Service, or any person authorized to cate, limited permit, or shipping docu- act for the Administrator. ment to identify such article. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. The Animal and Plant Health (b) The certificate or limited permit Inspection Service (APHIS) of the for the movement of a regulated article United States Department of Agri- shall be furnished by the carrier to the culture. consignee at the destination of the Associated article. Any article listed shipment. in § 301.92–2(c). Bark chips. Bark fragments broken or § 301.91–9 Costs and charges. shredded from a log or tree. The services of the inspector shall be Certificate. A document, stamp, or im- furnished without cost, except as pro- print by which an inspector or person vided in 7 CFR part 354. The U.S. De- operating under a compliance agree- partment of Agriculture will not be re- ment affirms that a specified regulated sponsible for any costs or charges inci- or associated article meets applicable dent to inspections or compliance with requirements of this subpart and may be moved interstate to any destination. the provisions of the quarantine and Compliance agreement. A written regulations in this subpart, other than agreement between APHIS and a per- for the services of the inspector. son engaged in growing, processing, handling, or moving regulated or asso- Subpart X—Phytophthora ciated articles, wherein the person Ramorum agrees to comply with this subpart. Duff. Decaying plant matter that in- cludes leaf litter, green waste, stem SOURCE: 72 FR 8597, Feb. 27, 2007, unless otherwise noted. Redesignated at 84 FR 2428, material, bark, and any other plant Feb. 7, 2019. 1 Any properly identified inspector is au- § 301.92 Restrictions on interstate thorized to stop and inspect persons and movement. means of conveyance and to seize, quar- antine, treat, apply other remedial measures (a) No person may move interstate to, destroy, or otherwise dispose of regulated from any quarantined area any regu- or restricted articles as provided in sections lated, restricted, or associated article 414, 421, and 434 of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7714, 7731, and 7754). 158 VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:13 Jun 23, 2020 Jkt 250016 PO 00000 Frm 00168 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\250016.XXX 250016 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA § 301.92–1 material that, upon visual inspection, terial that is grown in a nursery, and does not appear to have completely de- tree seedlings for reforestation, except composed. the following: Seeds; turf or sod; bulbs, Firewood. Wood that has been cut, tubers, corms, or rhizomes; 2 green- sawn, or chopped into a shape and size house grown cactus, succulents, and or- commonly used for fuel, or other wood chids; aquarium grown aquatic plants; intended for fuel. greenhouse, container, or field grown Forest stock. All flowers, trees, palms; greenhouse, container, or field shrubs, vines, scions, buds, or other grown cycads, and tissue culture plants plants that are wild-grown, backyard- grown in vitro; and plants meeting the grown, or naturally occurring. definition of forest stock. From. An article is considered to be Permit. A written authorization ‘‘from’’ a specific site or location for the purposes of this subpart if it was issued by APHIS to allow the inter- grown or propagated in, stored or sold, state movement of restricted articles or distributed from the site or location. in accordance with part 330 of this Growing media. Any material in chapter. which plant roots are growing or in- Person. Any association, company, tended for that purpose. corporation, firm, individual, joint Inspector. Any employee of APHIS, stock company, partnership, society, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, or or other entity. other person authorized by the Admin- Plant Protection and Quarantine. The istrator to perform the duties required Plant Protection and Quarantine pro- under this subpart. gram of the Animal and Plant Health Interstate. From any State into or Inspection Service, United States De- through any other State. partment of Agriculture. Log. The bole of a tree; trimmed tim- Quarantined area. Any State, or any ber that has not been sawn further portion of a State, listed in § 301.92– than to form cants. 3(a)(3) of this subpart or otherwise des- Lot. A contiguous block of plants of ignated as a quarantined area in ac- the same species or cultivar, of the cordance with § 301.92–3(a)(2) of this same container size and from the same subpart. source, if known. Lumber. Logs that have been sawn Regulated article. Any article listed in into boards, planks, or structural mem- § 301.92–2(b) of this subpart. bers such as beams. Restricted article. Any article listed in Moved (move, movement). Shipped, of- § 301.92–2(a) of this subpart. fered for shipment, received for trans- Regulated establishment. Any nursery portation, transported, carried, or al- regulated by APHIS pursuant to lowed to be moved, shipped, trans- § 301.92–3(b). ported, or carried. Soil. The loose surface material of the Mulch. Bark chips, wood chips, wood earth in which plants grow, in most shavings, or sawdust, or a mixture cases consisting of disintegrated rock thereof, that could be used as a protec- with an admixture of organic material. tive or decorative ground cover or as State. The District of Columbia, Puer- part of a growing media mixture. to Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, Non-host nursery stock. Any taxa of or any State, territory, or possession of nursery stock not listed in § 301.92–2 as the United States. a regulated or associated article. Nursery. Any location where nursery [72 FR 8597, Feb. 27, 2007, as amended at 84 stock is grown, propagated, stored, or FR 16192, Apr. 18, 2019] sold, or any location from which nurs- ery stock is distributed. Locations that grow trees for sale without roots (e.g., as Christmas trees) are considered to 2 Bulbs, tubers, corms, or rhizomes are only be nurseries for the purposes of this considered nursery stock (and therefore, reg- subpart. ulated under this subpart) if they are of Nursery stock. All plants for planting, plant taxa listed in § 301.92–2 as regulated ar- including houseplants, propagative ma- ticles or associated articles. 159 VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:13 Jun 23, 2020 Jkt 250016 PO 00000 Frm 00169 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\250016.XXX 250016.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Origin and Distribution of Phytophthora Cinnamomi
    THE ORIGIN AND DISTRIBUTION OF PHYTOPHTHORA CINNAMOMI RANDS IN AUSTRALIAN NATIVE PLANT COMMUNITIES AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ITS ASSOCIATION WITH PARTICULAR PLANT SPECIES By B. H. PRATT* and W. A. HEATHER* [Manuscript received 23 October 1972] Abstract The origin, distribution, and disease association of P. cinnamomi in native plant communities in Australia has been examined. The fungus was isolated from the root zones of 31 plant genera in 16 families and is widespread throughout eastern and southern Australia and south-western Western Australia. Although the fungus is associated with disease in native plant communities it is also present in apparently non-diseased communities. Disease occurs usually only in environments disturbed by man, probably as a result of increase in population or activity of pre-existing fungal populations. The widespread distribution of P. cinnamomi in native vegetation in Australia, its occurrence in remote, undisturbed areas, and the apparent balance it has achieved with plant species of differing susceptibility to disease in some natural, undisturbed areas suggests that the fungus is likely to be indigenous to eastern Australia. Further, it may be partly responsible for the localized distribution of some plant species. I. INTRODUCTION The soil-borne fungus Phytophthora cinnamomi Rands is widely distributed in Australia, in horticultural plantings (Zentmyer and Thorn 1967; Pratt and Wrigley 1970; as well as personal communications from the New South Wales Department of Agriculture, Tasmanian Department of Agriculture, Victorian Department of Agriculture, and the Queensland Department of Primary Industries), and in conifer nurseries and plantings (Oxenham and Winks 1963; Bertus 1968; and personal communications from the New South Wales Forestry Commission, and the Queens­ land Department of Forestry).
    [Show full text]
  • Taro Leaf Blight
    Plant Disease July 2011 PD-71 Taro Leaf Blight in Hawai‘i Scot Nelson,1 Fred Brooks,1 and Glenn Teves2 1Department of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences, Honolulu, HI 2 Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Sciences, Moloka‘i Extension Office, Ho‘olehua, HI aro (Colocasia es- ha (2.8 US tons/acre) Tculenta (L.) Schott) (FAOSTAT 2010 esti- grows in Hawai‘i and mates; Ramanatha et throughout the tropical al. 2010). Pacific as an edible In 2009, approx- aroid of historical and imately 1814 tonnes contemporary signifi- (2,000 US tons) of C. cance (Figure 1). Farmers esculenta were har- cultivate kalo (Hawaiian vested in Hawai‘i from for taro) in wet lowland 100 farms on 180 ha (Figure 2) or dryland (445 acres). More than (Figure 3) taro patches 80% of Hawai‘i’s pres- for its starchy, nutritious ent-day taro production corms. The heart-shaped occurs on the island of leaves are edible and Kaua‘i. The farm value can also serve as food Figure 1. A taro (Colocasia esculenta) patch in Hawai‘i. of Hawai‘i’s taro crop wrappings. Historically, in 2009 exceeded $2.4 taro crops provided nutritious food that helped early million (United States Department of Agriculture Polynesians to successfully colonize the Hawaiian 2011). Processors use mature corms of Hawaiian Islands. cultivars to make poi by steaming and macerating “Taro” refers to plants in one of four genera the taro. Cultivars processed into poi commercially within the family Araceae: Colocasia, Xanthosoma, are predominantly ‘Lehua’ types, and to a lesser Alocasia, and Cyrtosperma.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultivar Resistance to Taro Leaf Blight Disease in American Samoa
    Technical Report No. 34 Cultivar Resistance to Taro Leaf Blight Disease in American Samoa Fred E. Brooks, Plant Pathologist 49 grow poorly under severe blight conditions, their ABSTRACT reduced height and leaf surface should not raise the level of spores in the field enough to threaten A taro leaf blight (TLB) epidemic struck cultivar resistance. Further, American Samoans American Samoa and (Western) Samoa in 1993- are accepting the taste and texture of the new 1994, almost eliminating commercial and cultivars and planting local taro appears to have subsistence taro production (Colocasia declined. esculenta). In 1997, leaf blight-resistant cultivars from Micronesia were introduced into American Samoa. Some farmers, however, still try to raise INTRODUCTION severely diseased local cultivars among the resistant taro. This practice may increase the Taro has been a sustainable crop and dietary number of fungus spores in the field produced staple in the Pacific Islands for thousands of years by Phytophthora colocasiae and endanger plant (Ferentinos 1993). In American Samoa, it is resistance. The objective of this study was to grown on most family properties and is an determine the effect of interplanting resistant and important part of Fa’a Samoa traditional susceptible taro cultivars on TLB resistance and Samoan culture. Local production of taro, yield. Two resistant cultivars from the Republic Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott, was devastated of Palau, P16 (Meltalt) and P20 (Dirratengadik), by an epidemic of taro leaf blight (TLB) in late were planted in separate plots and interplanted 1993-1994 (Trujillo et al. 1997). Taro production with Rota (Antiguo), a cultivar assumed to be fell from 357,000 kg (786,000 lb) per year before susceptible to TLB.
    [Show full text]
  • Syngenta's Citrus Soil Assay for Phytophthora
    Photo Taken by: Kendra McCorkle Syngenta’s Citrus Soil Assay for Phytophthora Kendra McCorkle Last Updated: 10/02/16 Contents ● My Background ● Topic selection ● Module Contents ● Value of the learning module ● Acknowledgements ● Questions Photo Taken by: Kevin Langdon, Syngenta Background Information-Personal ● Florida Native - Reside on FL’s East coast ● Family in the citrus industry Photo Taken by: Kendra McCorkle Photo Taken by: Kathy Thomason http://indian-river.fl.us/citrus/district_map.gif Background Information-Personal Background Information- Professional ● Indian River State College (2008-2010) - A.A. Environmental Science ● Syngenta Internships - Summers of 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 ● University of Florida (2010-2012) - B.S. Environmental Management - Minor Soil and Water Science ● Syngenta Crop Protection - R&D Specialist (2012) ● Iowa State University (2014-2016) - M.S. Agronomy Topic selection ● Syngenta invested in my degree ● Current role entails fungicide efficacy trials - Another research project? ● Passionate about citrus ● Topic: Syngenta’s Citrus Soil Assay program - Important piece of my history Why a learning module? ● Create a training document for Syngenta - Basic introduction to the program - Used for internal and external customers Photos Taken by: Kendra McCorkle Module Contents ● Florida citrus ● Major diseases in Florida citrus ● Citrus Phytophthora ● Citrus greening ● Phytophthora and citrus greening interaction ● Syngenta’s citrus soil assay Photo Taken by: Kendra McCorkle Florida Citrus ● 500,000 total acres of citrus in FL - 453,000 acres of oranges (~90% of total) - 46,000 acres of grapefruit (~10% of total) ● Generates $9 billion for FL economy (Florida Citrus Mutual, 2012) Photo Taken by: Kendra McCorkle ● Florida provides 80% of the orange juice produced in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytophthora of Roses
    EPLP-020 4/16 Phytophthora of Roses Ashley Brake, Extension Assistant Kevin Ong, Associate Professor and Extension Plant Pathologist* Phytophthora root rot, also known as crown rot or basal stem rot is one of the most common and severe root-decaying diseases worldwide. It can occur in many types of host plants including trees, shrubs, and roses. A soilborne pathogen, Phytophthora survives in wet or moist soils, waiting for a living host to infect. There are several different species in the genus Phytophthora, and they all produce similar symptoms on diseased hosts. On rose plants, several species of Phytophthora, such as P. megasperma, P. cactorum, and P. citrophthora, are pathogenic and can cause the plant to wilt and die. Figure 2. The roots and crowns of plants infected with Phytophthora show poor structure and discoloration associated with rotting or dying tissue. Source: Texas Plant Disease Diagnostic Laboratory Symptoms Phytophthora root rot can result in leaf chlorosis, wilt- ing, and dieback of canes (Fig. 1). Below the soil, the crown tissue and roots become dark brown and necrotic (Fig. 2). Infected roots often appear water-soaked as they rot away. Larger roots, weakened by rot, can be easy to break off. Typical plant disease symptoms can be mistaken for other abiotic (non-living) ailments and lead to misdiagno- sis. For example, chlorosis of the leaves is often confused with nutrient deficiencies. The drought-like appearance on the foliage causes gardeners to compensate by overwatering, resulting in saturated soils—a favorable condition for this pathogen. Because roses that succumb to infection do not Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Taro Leaf Blight—A Threat to Food Security
    Agriculture 2012, 2, 182-203; doi:10.3390/agriculture2030182 OPEN ACCESS agriculture ISSN 2077-0472 www.mdpi.com/journal/agriculture Review Taro Leaf Blight—A Threat to Food Security Davinder Singh 1,*, Grahame Jackson 2, Danny Hunter 3, Robert Fullerton 4, Vincent Lebot 5, Mary Taylor 6, Tolo Iosefa 7, Tom Okpul 8 and Joy Tyson 4 1 Plant Breeding Institute Cobbitty, University of Sydney, Cobbitty, NSW 2570, Australia 2 24 Alt Street, Queens Park, NSW 2022, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Bioversity International, Rome 00057, Italy; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research, Mt Albert, Auckland 1025, New Zealand; E-Mails: [email protected] (B.F.); [email protected] (J.T.) 5 CIRAD, Port Vila, Vanuatu; E-Mail: [email protected] 6 Secretariat of Pacific Community, Suva, Fiji; E-Mail: [email protected] 7 Department of Crop Sciences, University of South Pacific, Apia, Samoa; E-Mail: [email protected] 8 Department of Agriculture, University of Technology, Lae, Morobe 411, Papua New Guinea; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-2-93518828; Fax: +61-2-93518875. Received: 23 May 2012; in revised form: 15 June 2012 / Accepted: 4 July 2012 / Published: 16 July 2012 Abstract: Taro leaf blight (caused by the Oomycete Phytophthora colocasiae) is a disease of major importance in many regions of the world where taro is grown. Serious outbreaks of taro leaf blight in Samoa in 1993 and in the last few years in Cameroon, Ghana and Nigeria continue to demonstrate the devastating impact of this disease on the livelihoods and food security of small farmers and rural communities dependent on the crop.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin of Phytophthora Cinnamomi: Evidence That It Is Not an Indigenous Fungus in the Americas G
    Ecology and Epidemiology Origin of Phytophthora cinnamomi: Evidence That It is Not an Indigenous Fungus in the Americas G. A. Zentmyer Professor, Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521. It is with pleasure that I acknowledge the invaluable assistance in collecting Perseaspp. in Latin America of many individuals and many organizations including personnel in the Ministries of Agriculture, Experiment Stations, and Universities, in most of the countries listed and the Rockefeller Foundation in Mexico; also the technical assistance in California of W. A. Thorn. Research in recent years supported in part by grants from the California Avocado Advisory Board. Accepted for publication 16 May 1977. ABSTRACT ZENTMYER, G. A. 1977. Origin of Phytophthora cinnamomi: Evidence that it is not an indigenous fungus in the Americas. Phytopathology 67:1373-1377. Cultures were made from roots from 373 native Persea cinnamomi was not recovered from any trees in native, trees and cultivated avocado trees (Persea americana) in 18 undisturbed sites, or from undisturbed soils in southern countries including Mexico and countries in Central and California avocado areas, but was readily recovered from South America and the Caribbean. The root samples were roots of trees brought into cultivation and affected with root collected from 11 species and varieties of Perseaand from five rot. These data indicate that it is unlikely that P. cinnamomi other related genera in the Lauraceae. Phytophthora is an indigenous fungus in the Americas. Additional key words: avocado, Persea. There has been considerable speculation in recent years Mississippi, and South Carolina, noting that the fungus regarding the possible origin of the cosmopolitan plant occurred".., in places remote from any known connection pathogen, Phytophthora cinnamomi Rands.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosing Phytophthora on Landscape Ornamentals
    RESEARCH LABORATORY TECHNICAL REPORT Diagnosing Phytophthora Diseases By the Bartlett Lab Staff On Landscape Ornamentals Directed by Kelby Fite, PhD Phytophthora spp. is an aggressive plant pathogen that affects many landscape ornamental plants. In fact, the word Phytophthora is derived from Greek, meaning “plant destroyer.” Root rot, root collar rot, and stem cankers are the most common problems caused by this pathogen; however, leaves, petioles, and fruit can also be infected on certain ornamental hosts. Figure 1: Phytophthora root rot on Taxus Phytophthora is a fungus-like organism that infects plant tissue under high-moisture conditions. Ornamentals planted in poorly drained, water-logged soils are most susceptible to infection as Phytophthora spreads via motile zoospores that are able to swim through films of water in the soil. In some cases, these zoospores can also splash onto and infect above ground plant parts causing stem cankers, shoot blighting, and leaf spots (Figure 4). When zoospores come in contact with a susceptible host, they germinate and invade the plant tissue. Figure 2: Close-ups of Phytophthora root rot on Taxus Disease symptoms can take days, weeks, or months to develop under favorable environmnetal conditions. Symptoms may include dieback, decline, bleeding cankers, stunting, leaf chlorosis, and/or plant death depending on the host and severity of the infection (Figures 1 and 2). Phytophthora has a wide host range including many woody ornamental landscape plants. Since Phytophthora is mainly a root decay pathogen, many of the hosts prone to infection are intolerant of saturated soils (Figure 3). Even in cases of Phytophthora canker, high moisture from frequent rainfall events or irrigation systems encourages disease development (Figure 5).
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Phytophthora Colocasiae of Cocoyams: a Potential Economic Disease of Food Security in Cameroon
    Discourse Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences www.resjournals.org/JAFS ISSN: 2346-7002 September 2013 Vol. 1(9): 140-145 An overview of Phytophthora colocasiae of cocoyams: A potential economic disease of food security in Cameroon Mbong GA1, *Fokunang CN2, Lum A. Fontem3, Bambot MB4, Tembe EA2 1Faculty of Science, Department of Plant Biology, University of Dschang, B.P. 67, Dschang, Cameroon 2Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé 1, Cameroon 3Faculty of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, University of Buea, Cameroon 4Faculty of Agronomic Sciences (FASA), University of Dschang, Cameroon * Email for Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract Cameroon is one of the food bread baskets for the Central African region and a big producer of cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta) locally known as taro. This crop is facing a significant production decline due to the increased incidence of taro leaf blight caused by the fungus Phytophthora colocasiae Raciborski. The blight disease has caused low yield, poor quality corms and reduced commercialization of the market product. There is also the problem of post harvest rapid biodeterioration of corms. The objective of this survey was to carry out a field assessment of the disease incidence, etiology, and damage, determine the mode of disease transmission and do post harvest evaluation of food quality. This pilot survey was aimed at generating field information to launch an expanded field survey in different ecological regions. Key word: Taro, Colocasia esculenta, Phytophthora colocasiae, Post harvest, Biodeterioration, Cameroon. INTRODUCTION Cameroon is one of the countries in the dense humid tropical forest of Africa where the subsistent farmers in the South– West, North–West and West Regions were alarmed by complete destruction of their taro crops by Taro Leaf Blight (TLB) during the 2010 cropping season.
    [Show full text]
  • Resistance of Subtropical Plants to Phytophthora Cinnamomi
    California Avocado Society 1951 Yearbook 36: 105-106 RESISTANCE OF SUBTROPICAL PLANTS TO PHYTOPHTHORA CINNAMOMI George A. Zentmyer and C. A. Schroeder Associate Plant Pathologist, University of California, Citrus Experiment Station; and Assistant Professor of Subtropical Horticulture, University of California, respectively. With a considerable avocado acreage affected with the root disease, there is interest in other tree crops as possible replants for the avocado in southern California. A number of other plants have been tested for resistance to Phytophthora cinnamomi, the fungus causing root rot, and observations have been made on the response of some of these plants when replanted in areas of disease in the field. This is a preliminary report on the current status of this phase of root rot investigations. Seedlings of the macadamia nut (Macadamia ternifolia), two species of persimmon (Diospyros lotus and D. kaki), cherimoya (Annona cherimola), and sweet and sour orange (Citrus sinensis and C. Aurantiurn) have been tested for resistance. Tests have been made in the greenhouse on the Riverside campus, both in soil brought in from areas where avocado trees are affected with root rot and in soil inoculated with cultures of Phytophthora cinnamomi. Results from the tests to date indicate that all the above plants are highly resistant if not immune to the avocado root rot disease. In one experiment young seedlings of avocado, macadamia, persimmon, and cherimoya were transplanted into pots of soil taken from around diseased trees in San Diego County. The pots were waterlogged for one week shortly after transplanting, by immersing the lower portion in water. The avocado seedlings wilted and showed typical symptoms of root rot within two weeks, and made no further growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Bud Rot and Other Major Diseases of Coconut, a Potential Threat to Oil Palm
    1 Bud rot and other major diseases of coconut, a potential threat to oil palm Dollet Michel1, Hubert de Franqueville2 Michel Ducamp1 1CIRAD, TA A-98/F, Campus International de Baillarguet, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5 2PalmElit - Parc Agropolis Bat.14 - 2214 Bd de la Lironde, 34980 Montferrier sur Lez INTRODUCTION Since the last quarter of the 20th century, it has had to be accepted that any pathogen can move from one continent to another, in a very short time, and affect any place on the planet. The best-known examples are animal and/or human pathogens. Reference will briefly be made to them as they are very concrete examples of the current epidemic context. However, this also applies for the spread of plant diseases that we have been witness to in the last thirty years. Not only do pathogens travel over long distances, they also “jump hosts”, be it in the Animal Kingdom or the Plant Kingdom. Climate changes may be conducive to such events. Using these data, we shall attempt to examine the possible risks of seeing pathogens of the coconut palm, Cocos nucifera, or even of other plants, attacking the oil palm, Elaeis guineensis. DISPERSAL/PROPAGATION OF ANIMAL AND HUMAN PATHOGENS Sars The first example involves SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) which was identified in humans in China at the end of 2002. At the beginning of 2003, a hotel in Hong Kong very close to the original focus was the starting point for an epidemic that affected Vietnam, Singapore and even Toronto in Canada within a few weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Blight: Phytophthora Infestans
    Plant Disease Diagnostic Clinic Plant Pathology and Plant‐Microbe Biology Section 334 Plant Science Building Ithaca, NY 14853‐5904 Late Blight: Phytophthora infestans Introduction New York gardeners are sometimes surprised by a quick and apparently spontaneous blighting and death of their potato and tomato plants during wet weather. Tubers harvested from such plants often rot in storage. Tomatoes often rot on the plant. These disappointing losses are the result of late blight, a disease caused by the fungus Phytophthora infestans. Late blight affects the foliage, fruits, and tubers of potato and tomato; hairy nightshade can also be affected. These plants are all members of the Solanaceae or "Nightshade" family. Figure 1: Lesions on the foliage of the potato (provided by Dr. William B. Fry, Cornell University) Late blight was responsible for the Irish potato famine in the 1850's. Millions of people in Ireland level in the canopy. The symptoms are usually most starved or were forced to emigrate when entire dramatic inside the canopy. During humid weather, a potato crops rotted in the field or in storage because white fuzz or mildew-like growth appears on the of infection by P. infestans. leaves (upper or under sides) and on stems. This indicates that the fungus is producing spores. Symptoms and Signs Infected potato tubers are discolored by a reddish- brown, granular rot (Fig. 2). The rot can be The characteristic foliar symptoms on any susceptible superficial or penetrate more deeply into the tubers plant are irregular to circular lesions. Initially, in wet (an inch or more). Tubers must be cut open to weather, the lesions may appear water-soaked; in dry observe this symptom.
    [Show full text]