Final Guide Historical Records Collection Rogue

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Guide Historical Records Collection Rogue FINAL GUIDE to the HISTORICAL RECORDS COLLECTION of the ROGUE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST (Medford, Oregon) (compiled and annotated by Jeff LaLande) November 2006 INTRODUCTION Scope and Purpose This Guide to the Historical Records Collection of the Rogue River National Forest, first compiled in 1978, has been updated semi-annually in order to facilitate the use of the Historical Records Collection as additional items have been accessioned into the Collection. This Final version of the Guide represents the Collection at the time (late 2006) that all of its original documents, maps, and photographs are being transferred to the care of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), at its facility in Seattle, Washington. The Collection has been formed under the directives of Forest Service Manual (FSM) 1681; it consists of approximately 15 linear feet of Forest Service and Forest Service-related documents, maps, and photographs produced by, or otherwise concerning, the Crater (later Rogue River) National Forest. There are over 650 individually catalogued text- or map-based items, in addition to approximately 3,300 photographs. Many of the individually catalogued text-based items actually consist of numerous separate components (e.g., dated correspondence of different dates, multiple reports). These records represent a wide variety of the many aspects of past national forest management. The documents range from early timber resource inventories and homestead examinations to relatively recent land exchange files and recreation reports. The maps include Forest visitor maps as well as resource-inventory maps that were generated for agency use. The 1 photographs cover a wide range of people, places, things, activities, and events associated with the Forest. Although many of the items in the Rogue River National Forest Historical Records Collection (RRNF-HRC) date from 1907 through 1960,1 it was kept current with many (potentially) historically most-useful and interesting Forest publications, correspondence records, and photographs from 1960 through about 2005 (the Rogue River NF and the Siskiyou NF were combined into a single national forest in 2003) that were selected by the compiler. Many of the items in the RRNF-HRC had been removed long ago from their original context as part of the Forest's “in-house” official records (i.e., their archival provenance had been disrupted long ago) and thus, as a "special manuscripts"-variety of historic records collection, the Collection does not archivally reflect the daily or long-term management functions or administrative organization of the agency. Instead, the items in the RRNF-HRC (many of which had been stored for years--virtually forgotten--in various cabinets, closets, desk drawers and private memorabilia albums) have been arranged into a unique filing system that has proved efficient for the purpose of rapid identification and retrieval by the compiler and other researchers. Because of the wide variety of material (including a large number of documents prepared under the old Forest Service alphabetical filing system, as well as some items that do not easily fall under the present agency file-designation system), the current Forest Service numerical file designation system was not used to organize the Collection. This Final Guide provides an organized, annotated listing of each item (or of each group of very similar or closely related items that are grouped together for convenience as an individual item) in the RRNF-HRC. The intent of the Guide over the years has been to enable Forest Service personnel, historians, other specialists, and interested members of the general public to utilize the historical-research potential of the RRNF-HRC while it was under direct Forest Service control in Medford, so that a better understanding of the Forest's past and present would be gained. Many items in the Forest's Historical Records Collection have proven to be valuable primary sources – not only during the research and writing of cultural resource overviews, environmental 1 I.e., from the establishment of the Crater National Forest under the administration of the U.S. Forest Service (name changed to Rogue River National Forest in 1932), through the initial years of the region's post-war timber harvest boom. 2 histories, and site-specific cultural resource inventory/evaluation reports, but also when gathering historical data dealing with a wide variety of other resource issues and administrative policies. 2 With the Collection’s transfer to NARA’s Seattle facility, it is the compiler’s hope that the RRNF-HRC’s goal of research utility and accessibility will continue to be met over the long term, and that this Final Guide will continue to serve as a useful finding aid. The Filing System The Historical Records Collection is arranged alphabetically under major subject headings (Examples: B file = Maps; D file = Fire Management; G file = Recreation Management). Within each major subject file, many items are arranged generally chronologically by date of publication (but, in the case of later additions to the HRC, they are arranged by order of accession into the Collection over the past 20+ years since the initial compilation of the Collection and its Guide). In the Guide, most items are annotated with a brief description of their contents. Note: Each subject file (for example, B file and D file) contains separately accessioned/labeled items (e.g., B-30 and D-12). In addition, at the end of a subject file (i.e., A, B. C, etc.) most subject files also include a "catch-all" zero folder (e.g., C-0, G-0) of related and very recent correspondence, newspaper clippings, and other materials of potential historic interest that were not able to be accessioned prior to transfer to NARA, and thus were not given separate HRC item numbers. A certain amount of overlap between the topics of the various subject files was unavoidable. While some cross-referencing has been provided, the researcher should first review the entire Guide in order to become familiar with the total collection. For example, someone interested in the history of a certain recreation development would probably find most of the relevant items in the G file; however, the B, J, M and O files might also contain useful material. A number of items not included in the B-Maps subject file also contain maps; the Guide’s item- specific annotations will prove more helpful in finding such contents than simply relying on the 2 The Historical Records Collection does not include the Cultural Resource Job Files (on-going c.r. site inventories/evaluations accomplished under the mandate of Sections 106 and 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966), miscellaneous archaeological and historical reports, or the currently-active (generally post-1963) official Forest Service recrods that are held in the various sections of the Supervisor's Office and the Ranger Districts. The latter continue to be periodically reviewed prior to being assigned a retention period and sent for storage to NARA’s Federal Record Center in Seattle. 3 subject heading of the HRC’s alphabetically identified subject files. In addition, relevant Forest Service numerical file-system designations are given for most of the Collection's subject files. Local Availability of Photographs Digitization of the approximately 3,300 images in the RRNF-HRC’s photograph collection was completed by the Forest Service prior to the Collection’s transfer to NARA. The Forest Service is grateful to David Knutson, Stacy Lundgren, and particularly Lee Webb for their efforts on the digitization project. The resulting collection of digital images is stored in multiple complete sets of binder volumes containing CDs and DVDs (as well as “thumbnails” printed on paper); complete sets of these binder volumes are kept at the Rogue River – Siskiyou National Forest Supervisor’s Office, and at the Southern Oregon University’s Hannon Library in Ashland. (Note: At the time of this writing, the intent is for the Hannon Library, through grant funds, to facilitate over the course of the next few years, the scanning of much of, if not all of, the remaining RRNF-HRC [i.e., digitizing items other than the photographs], with the digitized items becoming accessible on-line through the Library’s Southern Oregon Digital Archive [SODA]. This will enable researchers to use much of the HRC – including both photographs and text-based items on-line -- without having to travel to NARA’s Seattle facility.) Local Availability of Text-Based Items During the period that it was held in the Forest’s Supervisor’s Office in Medford the Forest’s Historical Records Collection was open for use by Forest Service personnel, persons engaged in professional research, and interested members of the general public. Items from the RRNF-HRC did not loan-out and were not removed from the Recreation-Heritage Section office. Photocopying of text-based items by researchers was permitted, and requested photographs were printed by the Forest Service with the requesting party then paying for the print. With NARA now responsible for curation of the original Collection, that agency’s rules and policies will now apply. However, researchers should note that in 2006 the compiler selected a number of (what were judged to be the more broadly historically informative) text-based items from the Collection for photocopying. Those copies were then placed at two Jackson County, Oregon locations, as “partial HRC” reference files that would remain available locally: (a) at the Heritage Program files of the Rogue River – Siskiyou National Forest Supervisor’s Office (SO), and (b) at the Special Collections section of the Hannon Library, Southern Oregon University (where these particular 4 items will eventually be digitized and included in the Southern Oregon Digital Archive [SODA] for on-line availability). In some cases, duplicate originals (as opposed to photocopies) were placed in these local partial-HRC reference files.
Recommended publications
  • Lakes Basin Bibliography
    Lakes Basin Bibliography OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES Lakes Basin Bibliography Bonnie E. Avery 4/2/2010 The Lakes Basin Bibliography consists of over 600 references relating to the natural resources of Oregon‘s Lakes Basin. Forty percent of the items listed are available to anyone online though not all links are persistent. The remaining sixty percent are held in at least one library either in print or via subscriptions to e-journal content. This set is organized in groups related issues associated with digitization and contribution to an institutional repository such as the ScholarsArchive@OSU which provide for persistent URLs. Also identified are ―key‖ documents as identified by Lakes Basin Explorer project partners and topical websites. i Lakes Basin Bibliography Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 I-a: Resources available online: Documents .............................................................................. 2 I-b: Resources available online: Streaming Video .................................................................... 30 II-a. Candidates for digitization: Print-only OSU Theses and Dissertations ............................. 33 II-b. Candidates for digitization: Government and other reports ............................................... 39 II-c: Candidates for digitization: Local archive collections ........................................................ 53 II-d. Candidates for digitization: Maps
    [Show full text]
  • Rogue River Watershed Council Bear Creek Working Group Monday, August 10, 2015 8:30 Am - 10:30 Am Conference Room 151, Lausmann Annex, City of Medford
    Rogue River Watershed Council Bear Creek Working Group Monday, August 10, 2015 8:30 am - 10:30 am Conference Room 151, Lausmann Annex, City of Medford MEETING MINUTES In attendance: Steve Mason, John Ward, Robert Coffan, Lori Tella, Natasche O’Brien Legg, Bob Jones, Ray Tharp, Eric Dittmer, Louise Shawkat, Ed Olson, Shane Jimerfield, Amie Martin Call to order: 8:40am by Working Group Chair, Steve Mason Rogue River Watershed Council Update Two new program managers have been hired: Donna Chickering and Sarah Sauter. Brian Barr has been busy out at Wimer and Fielder dams on Evans Creek. Removal of Wimer dam was completed and crews mobilized to Fielder dam downstream. Low flows in Evans Creek caused turbidity issues during the removal. The dams should be completely out by the end of August. Proposal from Lori Tella and Jennie Morgan As part of the merger, most of Bear Creek Watershed Council’s unrestricted funds moved into a “dedicated” fund, which restricts that money for use in the Bear Creek watershed. Bear Creek Watershed Education Partners (BCWEP) has historically run the Kids and Creeks event, with the Bear Creek Watershed Council as the major partner. The events offers an opportunity for people to learn about the Bear Creek watershed, contributing factors to water pollution, and see spawning salmon. The Rogue River Watershed Council (RRWC) would like to see the event continue, but BCWEP lost its funding for this year, so the RRWC would have to take the lead. Requested from the working group is approval to use a small portion of Bear Creek dedicated funds to help support the event.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Rogue Watershed Assessment
    Upper Rogue Watershed Assessment Chapter 2 Hydrology . TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 HYDROLOGY ............................................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 2.2 Water Use .......................................................................................................................1 2.3 Streamflow Data ............................................................................................................2 2.4 Peak Discharge ..............................................................................................................5 2.4.1 Trail Creek Subwatershed .....................................................................................5 2.4.2 Elk Creek Subwatershed .......................................................................................9 2.4.3 Upper Rogue River Subwatershed......................................................................12 2.4.4 South Fork Subwatershed...................................................................................16 2.4.5 Big Butte Creek Subwatershed ...........................................................................18 2.4.6 Lost Creek Lake Subwatershed ..........................................................................22 2.4.7 Shady Cove Subwatershed..................................................................................23 2.5 Summary ......................................................................................................................25
    [Show full text]
  • British Poetry of the Long Nineteenth Century
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Zea E-Books Zea E-Books 12-1-2019 British Poetry of the Long Nineteenth Century Beverley Rilett University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook Part of the Literature in English, British Isles Commons Recommended Citation Rilett, Beverley, "British Poetry of the Long Nineteenth Century" (2019). Zea E-Books. 81. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook/81 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Zea E-Books at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Zea E-Books by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. British Poetry of the Long Nineteenth Century A Selection for College Students Edited by Beverley Park Rilett, PhD. CHARLOTTE SMITH WILLIAM BLAKE WILLIAM WORDSWORTH SAMUEL TAYLOR COLERIDGE GEORGE GORDON BYRON PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY JOHN KEATS ELIZABETH BARRETT BROWNING ALFRED TENNYSON ROBERT BROWNING EMILY BRONTË GEORGE ELIOT MATTHEW ARNOLD GEORGE MEREDITH DANTE GABRIEL ROSSETTI CHRISTINA ROSSETTI OSCAR WILDE MARY ELIZABETH COLERIDGE ZEA BOOKS LINCOLN, NEBRASKA ISBN 978-1-60962-163-6 DOI 10.32873/UNL.DC.ZEA.1096 British Poetry of the Long Nineteenth Century A Selection for College Students Edited by Beverley Park Rilett, PhD. University of Nebraska —Lincoln Zea Books Lincoln, Nebraska Collection, notes, preface, and biographical sketches copyright © 2017 by Beverly Park Rilett. All poetry and images reproduced in this volume are in the public domain. ISBN: 978-1-60962-163-6 doi 10.32873/unl.dc.zea.1096 Cover image: The Lady of Shalott by John William Waterhouse, 1888 Zea Books are published by the University of Nebraska–Lincoln Libraries.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017/18 Steamboat Press Kit
    2017/18 Steamboat Press Kit TABLE OF CONTENTS What’s new this winter at Steamboat ............................................................... Pages 2-3 New ownership, additional nonstop flights, mountain coaster, gondola upgrades Expanded winter air program ........................................................................... Pages 4-5 Fly nonstop into Steamboat from 14 major U.S. airports. New this year: Austin, Kansas City Winter Olympic tradition ................................................................................ Pages 6-10 Steamboat has produced 89 winter Olympians, more than any other town in North America. Champagne Powder® snow ............................................................................ Pages 11-14 Family programs ............................................................................................. Pages 15-17 Mountain facts and statistics ......................................................................... Pages 18-21 History of Steamboat ...................................................................................... Pages 22-30 Events calendar .............................................................................................. Pages 31-34 Cowboy Downhill ............................................................................................ Pages 35-38 Night skiing and snowboarding ..................................................................... Pages 39-40 On-mountain dining and Steamboat’s top restaurants ............................... Pages 41-48
    [Show full text]
  • A Bill to Designate Certain National Forest System Lands in the State of Oregon for Inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System and for Other Purposes
    97 H.R.7340 Title: A bill to designate certain National Forest System lands in the State of Oregon for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System and for other purposes. Sponsor: Rep Weaver, James H. [OR-4] (introduced 12/1/1982) Cosponsors (2) Latest Major Action: 12/15/1982 Failed of passage/not agreed to in House. Status: Failed to Receive 2/3's Vote to Suspend and Pass by Yea-Nay Vote: 247 - 141 (Record Vote No: 454). SUMMARY AS OF: 12/9/1982--Reported to House amended, Part I. (There is 1 other summary) (Reported to House from the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs with amendment, H.Rept. 97-951 (Part I)) Oregon Wilderness Act of 1982 - Designates as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System the following lands in the State of Oregon: (1) the Columbia Gorge Wilderness in the Mount Hood National Forest; (2) the Salmon-Huckleberry Wilderness in the Mount Hood National Forest; (3) the Badger Creek Wilderness in the Mount Hood National Forest; (4) the Hidden Wilderness in the Mount Hood and Willamette National Forests; (5) the Middle Santiam Wilderness in the Willamette National Forest; (6) the Rock Creek Wilderness in the Siuslaw National Forest; (7) the Cummins Creek Wilderness in the Siuslaw National Forest; (8) the Boulder Creek Wilderness in the Umpqua National Forest; (9) the Rogue-Umpqua Divide Wilderness in the Umpqua and Rogue River National Forests; (10) the Grassy Knob Wilderness in and adjacent to the Siskiyou National Forest; (11) the Red Buttes Wilderness in and adjacent to the Siskiyou
    [Show full text]
  • Water Management and Conservation Plan March 2009
    Water Management and Conservation Plan March 2009 Water Management and Conservation Plan March 2009 CVO\082060036 Contents Section Page 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................1-1 Overview.....................................................................................................................1-1 Plan Organization ......................................................................................................1-3 Affected Local Governments....................................................................................1-3 Plan Update Schedule ...............................................................................................1-4 2 Water Supplier Description .............................................................................................2-1 Source ..........................................................................................................................2-1 Interconnections with Other Systems .....................................................................2-1 Intergovernmental Agreements...............................................................................2-2 Service Area Description...........................................................................................2-2 System Description ....................................................................................................2-5 Records of Water Use ................................................................................................2-8
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary for the Pacific Northwest Recreation Resource Advisory Committee
    Executive Summary for the Pacific Northwest Recreation Resource Advisory Committee Site: Illinois River Scenic Area Site Type: HIRA Proposed Action: New Fees Recommended Fees: Area Fee: Begin charging $5.00 per vehicle per day Site Description - The Illinois River Scenic Area is a highly used area within the nationally designated Illinois Wild and Scenic River corridor located on the Rogue River- Siskiyou National Forest, Wild Rivers Ranger District. The area is about 15 miles south of Grants Pass and within a 1 to 2 hour drive from the Rogue River Valley and Medford- Metropolitan area. The approximate 2,970 acre area is nestled in an old growth forest setting. The area has four campgrounds, five picnic areas, two scenic overlooks and interpretive sites, one historic site, five trailheads, four developed parking areas with swimming and rafting opportunities, and one private commercial lodge. The area is the gateway to the east side of the Kalmiopsis Wilderness and the Wild Section of the Illinois W&S River. The unique mix of recreation opportunities is significant to southern Oregon. Visits to the scenic area currently exceed 180,000 people per season. Fee Assessment - Recent capital investments of 1.2 million dollars in road and parking improvements, new picnic tables, shelters, trails, and campgrounds have been built to help serve the public, improve visitor safety and prevent resource damage. Subsequently, fees are needed to provide law enforcement presence, operation and maintenance. The recommended fees are based on 1) a Market Value analysis, 2) the Regional Campground Pricing rating, and 3) the Recreation Facility Analysis process.
    [Show full text]
  • United States of America 123 Ferc ¶ 62021
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 123 FERC ¶ 62,021 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION PacifiCorp Project No. 2630-004 ORDER ISSUING NEW LICENSE (April 8, 2008) INTRODUCTION 1. On June 27, 2003, PacifiCorp filed an application for a new license pursuant to sections 4(e) and 15 of the Federal Power Act (FPA),1 to continue operation and maintenance of the Prospect Nos. 1, 2, and 4 Hydroelectric Project No. 2630. The project’s authorized capacity being licensed is 41.56 megawatts (MW). The project is located on the Rogue River, Middle Fork Rogue River, and Red Blanket Creek in Jackson County, Oregon.2 The project does not occupy federal lands. 2. On October 26, 2006, PacifiCorp filed a Settlement Agreement (settlement) signed by it and the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (Oregon DFW) that addresses certain resident trout issues related to this relicense proceeding, including ramping rate effects and large woody debris management. 3. As discussed below, I am issuing a new license for the project. The license incorporates most of the settlement’s provisions. 1 16 U.S.C. §§ 797(e) and 808 (2000). 2 The project is part of PacifiCorp’s interconnected system that transmits power across state lines for public utility purposes. The project was constructed in different segments, the first of which was completed in 1911 (Prospect No. 1) and the last in 1944 (Prospect No. 4). Because the project (1) is located on a body of water over which Congress has Commerce Clause jurisdiction, (2) affects interstate commerce through its connection to an interstate power grid, and (3) has had significant post-1935 construction, it is required to be licensed pursuant to section 23(b)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Applegate River Basin
    122o15' 124o15' 43o00' DOUGLAS RIVER UE West ROG Branch Elk Cr COOS DOUGLAS Prospect 14330000 KLAMATH RIVER 14332000 14338000 Cascade Gorge South Fork Trail McLeod 14335040 14372300 14337500 Agness 14337600 Big ROGUE Evans Creek14339000 Butte JOSEPHINE Rogue Grants Pass River 14359000 Creek Gold Beach Illinois Wilderville 14361500 Gold Central 14369500 Hill Point N CURRY JACKSON A Applegate R River River 14357500 E Medford C Bear O Applegate 14377100 Ruch C I 14354200 F Chetco Kerby I 14366000 C Ashland Creek A P 14362250 14353500 14400000 Star Gulch 14353000 Brookings 14362000 42o00' 14361900 Copper 0102 03 0 40 MILE S 0102 03 0 40 KILO ME TE RS EXPLANATIO N 14371500 Stream-gaging station OREGON 14339000 Stream-gaging station and water-quality data collection site Figure 33. Location of surface-water and water-quality stations in the Rogue and Chetco River Basins. 832 See Figure 34. Lost Creek South Fork See Figure 34. Reservoir RM Rogue River 167.3 Completed 1977 14335040 RM 157.2 14337500 RM RM 0.64 Big Butte Creek 155.3 14337600 14338000 RM 154.0 RM 1.2 Elk RM Creek RM 151.9 3.3 14339000 RM 138.6 RM RM Bear Creek 21.1 126.8 14357500 14354200 RM 10.1 RM 21.0 14359000 Creek Ashland RM RM 125.8 4.9 Reeder West Branch Elk Creek Elk Creek Branch West Reservoir East Fork RM Ashland 5.3 Creek 14353500 14353000 RM 0.3 RM 5.6 Creek Creek EXPLANATION Ashland West Fork Fork West 14357500 Stream-gaging 14361500 RM 101.8 14361900 station RM 46.3 RM 14369500 Stream-gaging Applegate RM APPLEGATE 37.5 RIVER station and 94.8 14369500 14366000 14362000 Lake water-quality RM 7.6 RM 26.7 RM 45.7 data collection 14362250 site RM 1.1 RM 1.2 River mile Stream—Arrow shows direction ROGUE RIVER ROGUE of flow Star Gulch 14372300 RM 29.7 14400000 RM 10.7 RM ILLINOIS RIVER 27.1 14377100 RM 50.3 CHETCO RIVER P A C I F I C O C E A N Figure 35.
    [Show full text]
  • Application for Low Impact Hydropower Institute Recertification Prospect No. 3 Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. P-2337; LIHI
    Application for Low Impact Hydropower Institute Recertification Prospect No. 3 Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. P-2337; LIHI Certificate No. 109) Jackson County, Oregon Prepared by: PacifiCorp 925 South Grape Street, Building 5 Medford, OR 97501 February 2020 Application for LIHI Recertification Prospect No. 3 Hydroelectric Project (Certificate No. 109) TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................... II LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................... IV LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................... IV ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................. VI 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 PROJECT FACILITIES .............................................................................................. 1 1.1.1 South Fork Diversion Dam ........................................................................... 8 1.1.2 South Fork Impoundment ............................................................................. 8 1.1.3 Fish Passage Facilities .................................................................................. 8 1.1.4 Proposed Auxiliary Minimum Flow Release System ................................. 10 1.1.5 Conduit
    [Show full text]
  • IC-62, Heat Flow Studies in the Steamboat Mountain-Lemei Rock
    ,. \\ :\ .J ~\ .... 7 \; t,6 i u2 W~~fnffl:RY u.no C ';I, .... DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES i n BERT L. COLE, Commissioner of Public Lands ; RALPH A. BESWICK Supervisor I: s DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES VAUGHN E. LIVINGSTON, JR., State Geologist INFORMATION CIRCULAR 62 HEAT FLOW STUDIES IN THE STEAMBOAT MOUNTAIN-LEMEI ROCK AREA, SKAMANIA COUNTY, WASHINGTON BY J. ERIC SCHUSTER, DAVID D. BLACKWELL, PAUL E. HAMMOND, and MARSHALL T. HUNTTING Final report to the NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION on sponsored proiect AER75 ... 02747 1978 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES BERT L COLE, Commissioner of Public Lands RALPH A. BESWICK Supervisor DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES VAUGHN E. LIVINGSTON, JR., State Geologist INFORMATION CIRCULAR WA He<1.t iluw 33.J. -7 stu.diei::,; ln the .M6 t> i Stean, l:on. t --- bJ. ~uu,i ta i u-.Lem~ i 1970 Jiuck d.rea, Skaina11ia Cuunt),, W a i'ii1 i u ~ton HEAT FLOW STUDIES IN THE STEAMBOAT MOUNTAIN-LEMEI ROCK AREA, SKAMANIA COUNTY, WASHINGTON BY J. ERIC SCHUSTER, DAVID D. BLACKWELL, PAUL E. HAMMOND, and MARSHALL T. HUNTTING Final report to the NATIONAL SC !ENCE FOUNDATION on sponsored project AER75-02747 1978 CONTENTS Abstract ................. , . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 Introduction ..................................................................... , • . 2 Acknowledgments • • • • • • . • • . • . • • . • . • . • . • . • . • • • • • • . • • • • . • . 3 Geo logy • . • • • • • • . • • • • • • . • • . • • . • . • . • • . • . 4 Genera I features ............................
    [Show full text]