The Israelite Conquest During the Periods of Joshua and the Judges

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Israelite Conquest During the Periods of Joshua and the Judges History or Myth? An Archaeological Evaluation of the Israelite Conquest during the periods of Joshua and the Judges By Titus Michael Kennedy The thesis examines the archaeological and epigraphic data from Canaan during the Late Bronze Age in order to evaluate the historicity of the Israelite Conquest accounts in the books of Joshua and Judges. The specific sites examined in detail include Jericho, Ai, Hazor, Shechem, and Dan. Additionally, the chronology and setting for the period of the alleged Israelite Conquest is explained through both textual and archaeological sources, and several ancient documentary sources are examined which demonstrate the presence of Israel in Canaan during the Late Bronze Age. The thesis concludes that a vast amount of archaeological evidence indicates that the sites of Jericho, Hazor, Shechem, and Dan were occupied, destroyed, and resettled at the specific times and in the manner consistent with the records from the books of Joshua and Judges, and that ancient documents indicate that the Israelites had appeared in Canaan during the Late Bronze Age. Key terms: Israelite Conquest; Joshua; Judges; Late Bronze Age; Canaan; Israel; Hazor; Jericho; Ai; Archaeology. THE ISRAELITE CONQUEST: HISTORY OR MYTH? AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF THE ISRAELITE CONQUEST DURING THE PERIODS OF JOSHUA AND THE JUDGES by TITUS MICHAEL KENNEDY submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the subject BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA SUPERVISOR: PROF C L v W SCHEEPERS NOVEMBER 2011 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Research Question 1 1.2 Hypothesis 4 1.3 Research Methodology 6 1.4 Aim of the Study 6 1.5 Layout of the Study 7 1.6 Literature Review 10 Chapter 2 Chronology and Setting of the Israelite Conquest 19 2.1 An Absolute Chronology for the Reign of Solomon from Hebrew, Assyrian, Babylonian, Egyptian, Greek, and Roman Sources 19 2.2 An Absolute Chronology for the Beginning of the Israelite Conquest under Joshua 21 2.3 An Approximate Chronology for the Israelite Conquest under the Judges 23 2.4 Fortified Cities of the Late Bronze Age and the Israelite Conquest Accounts 27 2.5 Reports of Fortified Cities 28 2.6 A Survey of Late Bronze I Fortifications in Canaan 29 2.7 How Could the Tribes of Israel Conquer Canaan? Military Strategy 35 Chapter 3 Ancient Documents and the Israelite Conquest of Canaan 40 3.1 The Amarna Letters: Chronology of the Canaanite Correspondence 40 3.2 Is the Term Hapiru Compatible with the Israelites in the Conquest? 44 3.3 The Amarna Letters and the Israelite Conquest 46 3.4 Cities in the Amarna Letters, Joshua, and Judges 52 3.5 The Hornet Sent Before 54 3.6 Ancient Texts Mentioning Israel in Canaan 56 iii 3.6.1 The Merneptah Stele 56 3.6.2 The Possible Mention of the Israelite Tribe of Asher on Lists of Amenhotep III, Seti I, Ramses II, and Papyrus Anastasi I 58 3.6.3 Hapiru of Yarmutu 60 3.6.4 Egyptian Stone Relief Fragment 60 3.6.5 Ugaritic Texts Mentioning the Name Israel 61 3.6.6 An Assyrian Text Mentioning the Jairites 62 3.7 Conclusion about the Textual Evidence 62 Chapter 4 The Israelite Conquest and the City of Jericho 64 4.1 Views of the Jericho Conquest in Scholarship 64 4.2 Ceramic Analysis of Jericho City IV 70 4.3 Scarabs and Seals from Jericho 80 4.4 Stratigraphy of Jericho IV 83 4.5 The Walls of Jericho IVc 85 4.6 The Destruction of Jericho IVc 90 4.7 Houses on the Wall, Grain, and Time of Attack 93 4.8 The Destroyers of Jericho IVc 96 4.9 Carbon-14 Samples 99 4.10 Garstang’s Middle Building and Eglon of Moab 101 4.11 Conclusion about the Conquest of Jericho 104 Chapter 5 The Late Bronze Age Conquests at Hazor According to the Books of Joshua and Judges 106 5.1 Theories for the Israelites and the Conquest of Hazor 107 5.2 The 13th Century BCE Destruction 111 5.3 Statues of Stratum XIII 114 5.4 Destruction of Lower City Areas in the 13th Century BCE 119 5.5 Forced Entry 120 iv 5.6 The Amarna Letters and Hazor 121 5.7 The Extensive 15th Century BCE Destruction 125 5.8 A Scarab of Thutmose IV 127 5.9 Ceramic Analysis of the Late Bronze I City 129 5.10 Statue Desecration in the 15th Century BCE? 130 5.11 A Divination Tablet 131 5.12 The Area H Temple 133 5.13 The Walls of Hazor 134 5.14 Abandoned Houses 135 5.15 The Area M Entrance 136 5.16 The Upper City Area A 137 5.17 The Name of Yabin, King of Hazor 140 5.18 Conclusion about the Late Bronze Age Conquests of Hazor 141 Chapter 6 The City of Ai and the Israelite Conquest 142 6.1 The Elusive Site of Ai 142 6.2 The Etymology of Ai 146 6.3 The Story of Ai as History or Myth? 147 6.4 Khirbet et-Tell as the Site of Ai 147 6.5 Beth-Aven and et-Tell 152 6.6 Bethel and et-Tell 153 6.7 Khirbet Haiyan 155 6.8 Khirbet Khudriya 155 6.9 Khirbet el-Hay 156 6.10 Khirbet Nisya 156 6.11 Khirbet el-Maqatir 159 6.12 A Solution for Ai or Site Still Unknown? 162 Chapter 7 Shechem and Dan during the Israelite Conquest Period 164 v 7.1 Shechem and Dan as Important Sites in the Israelite Conquest 164 7.2 Shechem in the Book of Joshua 164 7.3 Shechem Destroyed by Abimelech? 170 7.4 The Israelite Conquest of Dan 172 7.5 Conclusions about the Shechem and Dan Accounts 174 Chapter 8 Conclusions Regarding the Israelite Conquest Accounts in Light of the Archaeological Data 175 8.1 The Setting in Time and Place 175 8.2 The Early Conquest under Joshua 176 8.3 Later Conquests during the Rule of the Judges 179 8.4 Ancient Texts Related to the Israelite Conquest 181 8.5 Conclusion from the Composite Evidence 181 Bibliography 183 vi Chapter 1 Introduction The era of the Israelite Conquest of Canaan, from the crossing of the Jordan and entrance into the Promised Land until the end of the Judges period, was a critically decisive time in the history of the nation of Israel according to the books of Joshua and Judges. Recorded in the book of Numbers is an instruction to Moses and the Israelites which says, “When you cross over the Jordan into the land of Canaan, then you shall drive out all the inhabitants of the land from before you, and destroy all their figured stones, and destroy all their molten images and demolish all their high places; and you shall take possession of the land and live in it, for I have given the land to you to possess it” (Numbers 33:51-53, NASB). This conquest, according to the ancient texts of Deuteronomy, Joshua, and Judges, was an attempt at driving out the Canaanites and establishing a cohesive Israelite nation in the Promised Land. Although, according to the book of Joshua, many areas were conquered and taken in the initial attacks led by Joshua, the Israelites continued to battle for control of the land against the Canaanites for centuries. In the beginning of the book of Judges, commenting on the period at the end of Joshua’s command, the text lists off the many places that the Israelites were not able to conquer. These cities and areas included: Beth-shean, Taanach, Dor, Ibleam, Megiddo, Gezer, Kitron, Nahalol, Akko, Sidon, Ahlab, Achzib, Helbah, Aphik, Rehob, Beth-shemesh, Beth-anath, the area of Mount Heres, Aijalon, Shaalbim, and the lowland coastal plain around Gaza and Ashkelon (Judges 1:19,27-35, NASB). Thus, not until the Monarchy period is the land completely conquered—and even then the Philistines had to be dealt with. 1.1 Research Question Regarding the series of events called the Israelite Conquest, there are three main views: the conquest began at the end of the 15th century BCE, the conquest began at the end of the 13th century BCE, or the “conquest” never really occurred, but the 1 emergence and settlement of the Israelites began in the early Iron Age. For those who do take the Israelite Conquest narratives as reliable history, according to a literal chronological reading, this era of continual conquest lasted approximately 350 years.1 Another historical view, which asserts a figurative reading of the chronological data, suggests this time period was much shorter—less than 200 years. The alternative hypotheses assert that no Israelite Conquest occurred, and offer various explanations of the textual and archaeological data from Late Bronze Age and Iron I Canaan and the origins of the narratives in the books of Joshua and Judges. The books of Joshua and Judges may appear to be written in the historical genre because names of real places mentioned, names of people are mentioned, events are arranged in a chronological order, the content is mostly about battles and land grants, and the “now it came about” phrase claiming the following events took place (Joshua 1:1; Judges 1:1). However, following in the tradition of Noth and Fritz, many current scholars propose that the conquest narratives of Joshua and Judges are not actual history, but invented history and etiologies from a much later period that are important theologically but not historically (Noort 1998: 127-28; McConville and Williams 2010: 4; Pressler 2002: 3-6).
Recommended publications
  • TAU Archaeology the Jacob M
    TAU Archaeology The Jacob M. Alkow Department of Archaeology and Ancient Near Eastern Cultures and The Sonia and Marco Nadler Institute of Archaeology The Lester and Sally Entin Faculty of Humanities | Tel Aviv University Number 4 | Summer 2018 Golden Jubilee Edition 1968–2018 TAU Archaeology Newsletter of The Jacob M. Alkow Department of Archaeology and Ancient Near Eastern Cultures and The Sonia and Marco Nadler Institute of Archaeology The Lester and Sally Entin Faculty of Humanities Number 4 | Summer 2018 Editor: Alexandra Wrathall Graphics: Noa Evron Board: Oded Lipschits Ran Barkai Ido Koch Nirit Kedem Contact the editors and editorial board: [email protected] Discover more: Institute: archaeology.tau.ac.il Department: archaeo.tau.ac.il Cover Image: Professor Yohanan Aharoni teaching Tel Aviv University students in the field, during the 1969 season of the Tel Beer-sheba Expedition. (Courtesy of the Sonia and Marco Nadler Institute of Archaeology, Tel Aviv University). Photo retouched by Sasha Flit and Yonatan Kedem. ISSN: 2521-0971 | EISSN: 252-098X Contents Message from the Chair of the Department and the Director of the Institute 2 Fieldwork 3 Tel Shimron, 2017 | Megan Sauter, Daniel M. Master, and Mario A.S. Martin 4 Excavation on the Western Slopes of the City of David (‘Giv’ati’), 2018 | Yuval Gadot and Yiftah Shalev 5 Exploring the Medieval Landscape of Khirbet Beit Mamzil, Jerusalem, 2018 | Omer Ze'evi, Yelena Elgart-Sharon, and Yuval Gadot 6 Central Timna Valley Excavations, 2018 | Erez Ben-Yosef and Benjamin
    [Show full text]
  • THE TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY 1. Roman Road
    THE TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY S. DOUGLAS WATERHOUSE ROBERT IBACH, JR. Andrews University Grace Theological Seminary Berrien Springs, Michigan Winona Lake, Indiana 1. Roman Road from Liwius to Esbus (Fig. 10) To trace the Roman road from Livias (modern Ten er-Rameh) in the Jordan Valley to Esbus (the Greek-Latin designation for Biblical Heshbon), a survey team of four was commi~sioned.~ Long known but never completely traced, this Roman road connected Jerusalem, Jericho, Livias, and Esbus, thus linking the road system of Palestine with the famous north-south uia nova of Trajan in the Roman province of Arabia, east of the Jordan (where Esbus/ Heshbon is situated ) .2 Just as Trajan's north-south "new road" was built ( A.D. 111-114 ) along the course of the much older Biblical "King's Highway" (Num 20:17; 21:22; cf. Gn 145, 6),3so the east-west road, from Jericho to Heshbon, was built near, if not always along, the Biblical "Way of Beth-Jeshimoth" (see the 'Hebrew text of Jos The survey team was to trace the Roman road from Esbus to the Jordan Valley and to obtain an archaeological picture of the occupational sites near Tell Hesbdn, with special emphasis on the large valley, the Wadi Hesbdn. Team members were S. Douglas Waterhouse, Robert Ibach, Charlene Hogsten, Eugenia Nitowski (part-time), and (as translators) the representatives of the Jordanian Department of Antiquities attached to the Heshbon Expedition. a Peter Thomsen, "Die romischen Meilensteine der Provinzen Syria, Arabia und Palaestina," ZDPV, 40 (1917): 67-68; Michael Avi-Yonah, The Holy Land (Grand Rapids, Mich., 1966), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • New Early Eighth-Century B.C. Earthquake Evidence at Tel Gezer: Archaeological, Geological, and Literary Indications and Correlations
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Master's Theses Graduate Research 1992 New Early Eighth-century B.C. Earthquake Evidence at Tel Gezer: Archaeological, Geological, and Literary Indications and Correlations Michael Gerald Hasel Andrews University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/theses Recommended Citation Hasel, Michael Gerald, "New Early Eighth-century B.C. Earthquake Evidence at Tel Gezer: Archaeological, Geological, and Literary Indications and Correlations" (1992). Master's Theses. 41. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/theses/41 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thank you for your interest in the Andrews University Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses. Please honor the copyright of this document by not duplicating or distributing additional copies in any form without the author’s express written permission. Thanks for your cooperation. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • THE VICTORY at AI Joshua 8:1-29 in Joshua 8, God Gives the Children Of
    THE VICTORY AT AI Though the primary cause of defeat the first time around was sin...a Joshua 8:1-29 secondary cause was underestimating the enemy (Joshua 7:3-4). In Joshua 8, God gives the children of Israel a second chance, this time I have given into your hand the king of Ai, his people, his city, to do things His way in the taking of the city of Ai. The momentum and his land (vs. 1b)...The defeat of Ai has been assured. God Israel had achieved by the miraculous crossing of the Jordan and the promised to turn the place of defeat into a place of victory. supernatural victory over Jericho was stopped by their defeat at Ai. You shall take only its spoil and its cattle as plunder for your- But one must always remember that Israel was defeated...not because selves (vs. 2b)...Before the actual battle plan was revealed to Joshua they were out manned...they were defeated because of sin. As a result he was told that the spoil of Ai, along with its livestock, could be of their defeat, despair permeated, not only among all those in the camp, taken. Jericho had been placed under the ban...Ai was not. but also within the heart of Joshua (Joshua 7:5). What an irony. If only Achan hadn’t been so greedy and selfish and Now with Achan’s sin judged, God’s favor toward Israel was restored had obeyed God...and had just waited on God...he would have had (Galatians 6:1) and He reassured Joshua that He had not forsaken him all his heart would have desired...and he would have had God’s or His people.
    [Show full text]
  • Heshbon (Modern Hesbdn) Is Located in Transj Ordan
    THE HISTORY OF HESHBON FROM LITERARY SOURCES * WERNER VYHMEISTER River Plate College, Puiggari, Entre Rios, Argentina Heshbon (modern Hesbdn) is located in Transjordan, about 20 miles east of the Jordan where it enters the Dead Sea. The remains of the old city are covered now by two hills, 2,930 and 2,954 feet above sea level respectively. According to the latest available statistics (from 1961), the village of Hesbdn has 718 inhabitants. Heshbon in OT Times Heshbon appears for the first time in the Biblical record as the capital city of Sihon, the Amorite king defeated by Moses. However, the region in which Heshbon was located is mentioned much earlier in the Bible. In Gn 14:5, Chedor- laomer and his confederates appear as smiting successively the Rephaim in Ashteroth-karnaim, the Zuzim in Ham, and the Emim in Shaveh Kiriathaim (i.e., the plain of Kiria- thaim). Kiriathaim has been identified with el-Qerei ydt, about five miles northwest of Dhz'bdn. It appears together with Heshbon in Num 32:37 among the cities rebuilt by the This article is a condensation of a B.D. thesis covering the same subject, deposited in the James White Library of Andrews University. * "Heshbon," Encyclopaedia Biblica, eds. T. K. Cheyne and J. S. Black, I1 (London, I~OI),col. 2044. "mi Dajani, director of the Department of Antiquities of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Letter to the author, December 12, 1966. 8 Num 21 :21 ff. 4 Siegfried H. Horn et al., Seventh-day Adventist Bible Dictionary (Washington, D. C., 1960)~p.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pre-Feasibility Study on Water Conveyance Routes to the Dead
    A PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY ON WATER CONVEYANCE ROUTES TO THE DEAD SEA Published by Arava Institute for Environmental Studies, Kibbutz Ketura, D.N Hevel Eilot 88840, ISRAEL. Copyright by Willner Bros. Ltd. 2013. All rights reserved. Funded by: Willner Bros Ltd. Publisher: Arava Institute for Environmental Studies Research Team: Samuel E. Willner, Dr. Clive Lipchin, Shira Kronich, Tal Amiel, Nathan Hartshorne and Shae Selix www.arava.org TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 HISTORICAL REVIEW 5 2.1 THE EVOLUTION OF THE MED-DEAD SEA CONVEYANCE PROJECT ................................................................... 7 2.2 THE HISTORY OF THE CONVEYANCE SINCE ISRAELI INDEPENDENCE .................................................................. 9 2.3 UNITED NATIONS INTERVENTION ......................................................................................................... 12 2.4 MULTILATERAL COOPERATION ............................................................................................................ 12 3 MED-DEAD PROJECT BENEFITS 14 3.1 WATER MANAGEMENT IN ISRAEL, JORDAN AND THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY ............................................... 14 3.2 POWER GENERATION IN ISRAEL ........................................................................................................... 18 3.3 ENERGY SECTOR IN THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY .................................................................................... 20 3.4 POWER GENERATION IN JORDAN ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Christian's Map of the Holy Land
    A CHRISTIAN'S MAP OF THE HOLY LAND Sidon N ia ic n e o Zarefath h P (Sarepta) n R E i I T U A y r t s i Mt. of Lebanon n i Mt. of Antilebanon Mt. M y Hermon ’ Beaufort n s a u b s s LEGEND e J A IJON a H Kal'at S Towns visited by Jesus as I L e o n Nain t e s Nimrud mentioned in the Gospels Caesarea I C Philippi (Banias, Paneas) Old Towns New Towns ABEL BETH DAN I MA’ACHA T Tyre A B a n Ruins Fortress/Castle I N i a s Lake Je KANAH Journeys of Jesus E s Pjlaia E u N s ’ Ancient Road HADDERY TYRE M O i REHOB n S (ROSH HANIKRA) A i KUNEITRA s Bar'am t r H y s u Towns visited by Jesus MISREPOTH in K Kedesh sc MAIM Ph a Sidon P oe Merom am n HAZOR D Tyre ic o U N ACHZIV ia BET HANOTH t Caesarea Philippi d a o Bethsaida Julias GISCALA HAROSH A R Capernaum an A om Tabgha E R G Magdala Shave ACHSAPH E SAFED Zion n Cana E L a Nazareth I RAMAH d r Nain L Chorazin o J Bethsaida Bethabara N Mt. of Beatitudes A Julias Shechem (Jacob’s Well) ACRE GOLAN Bethany (Mt. of Olives) PISE GENES VENISE AMALFI (Akko) G Capernaum A CABUL Bethany (Jordan) Tabgha Ephraim Jotapata (Heptapegon) Gergesa (Kursi) Jericho R 70 A.D. Magdala Jerusalem HAIFA 1187 Emmaus HIPPOS (Susita) Horns of Hittin Bethlehem K TIBERIAS R i Arbel APHEK s Gamala h Sea of o Atlit n TARICHAFA Galilee SEPPHORIS Castle pelerin Y a r m u k E Bet Tsippori Cana Shearim Yezreel Valley Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scale Insects (Hemiptera: Coccoidea) of Oak Trees (Fagaceae: Quercus Spp.) in Israel
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY, Vol. 43, 2013, pp. 95-124 The scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccoidea) of oak trees (Fagaceae: Quercus spp.) in Israel MALKIE SPODEK1,2, YAIR BEN-DOV1 AND ZVI MENDEL1 1Department of Entomology, Volcani Center, Agricultural Research Organization, POB 6, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel 2Department of Entomology, Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, POB 12, Rehovot 76100, Israel Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccoidea) of four species of oaks (Fagaceae: Quercus) in Israel namely, Q. boissieri, Q. calliprinos, Q. ithaburensis, and Q. look were collected and identified from natural forest stands during the period 2010-2013. A total of twenty-seven species were determined from nine scale insect families: Asterolecaniidae (3 species), Coccidae (3), Di- aspididae (7), Eriococcidae (3), Kermesidae (6), Kuwaniidae (1), Mono- phlebidae (1), Pseudococcidae (2), and Putoidae (1). Six of these species represent new records for Israel and five are identified to the genus level. Kuwaniidae is a new family record for Israel. Species that were previously collected or recorded on oaks in Israel are listed and discussed. Information is given about host trees and global distribution. The majority of the spe- cies reported here are monophagous or stenophagous and they appear to be non-pestiferous to the oak trees in Israel. General traits that describe each scale insect family in the field are provided, together with an identification key to aid in the determination of slide-mounted specimens into families represented in this study. KEY WORDS: Scale insect, Coccoidea, oak trees, Quercus, forest, survey, monophagous, univoltine, Mediterranean, Israel INTRODUCTION The genus Quercus (Fagaceae) has a rich and diverse arthropod fauna associated with it (Southwood, 1961; Southwood et al., 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Three Conquests of Canaan
    ÅA Wars in the Middle East are almost an every day part of Eero Junkkaala:of Three Canaan Conquests our lives, and undeniably the history of war in this area is very long indeed. This study examines three such wars, all of which were directed against the Land of Canaan. Two campaigns were conducted by Egyptian Pharaohs and one by the Israelites. The question considered being Eero Junkkaala whether or not these wars really took place. This study gives one methodological viewpoint to answer this ques- tion. The author studies the archaeology of all the geo- Three Conquests of Canaan graphical sites mentioned in the lists of Thutmosis III and A Comparative Study of Two Egyptian Military Campaigns and Shishak and compares them with the cities mentioned in Joshua 10-12 in the Light of Recent Archaeological Evidence the Conquest stories in the Book of Joshua. Altogether 116 sites were studied, and the com- parison between the texts and the archaeological results offered a possibility of establishing whether the cities mentioned, in the sources in question, were inhabited, and, furthermore, might have been destroyed during the time of the Pharaohs and the biblical settlement pe- riod. Despite the nature of the two written sources being so very different it was possible to make a comparative study. This study gives a fresh view on the fierce discus- sion concerning the emergence of the Israelites. It also challenges both Egyptological and biblical studies to use the written texts and the archaeological material togeth- er so that they are not so separated from each other, as is often the case.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Conquest of Canaan: Presidential Address at the Annual Meeting, Dec
    Israel's Conquest of Canaan: Presidential Address at the Annual Meeting, Dec. 27, 1912 Author(s): Lewis Bayles Paton Reviewed work(s): Source: Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 32, No. 1 (Apr., 1913), pp. 1-53 Published by: The Society of Biblical Literature Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3259319 . Accessed: 09/04/2012 16:53 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Society of Biblical Literature is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Biblical Literature. http://www.jstor.org JOURNAL OF BIBLICAL LITERATURE Volume XXXII Part I 1913 Israel's Conquest of Canaan Presidential Address at the Annual Meeting, Dec. 27, 1912 LEWIS BAYLES PATON HARTFORD THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY problem of Old Testament history is more fundamental NO than that of the manner in which the conquest of Canaan was effected by the Hebrew tribes. If they came unitedly, there is a possibility that they were united in the desert and in Egypt. If their invasions were separated by wide intervals of time, there is no probability that they were united in their earlier history. Our estimate of the Patriarchal and the Mosaic traditions is thus conditioned upon the answer that we give to this question.
    [Show full text]
  • BIBLIOTHECA SACRA for July, 1916, Mr
    1918.] ,The Exodus in the Light of Archteology. 543 ARTICLE III. THE EXODUS IN THE LIGHT OF ARCH2EOLOGY. BY THE REVEREND A. E. WHATHAM, LOUISVILlE, KY. IN the BIBLIOTHECA SACRA for July, 1916, Mr. Harold M. Wiener published an article entitled "The Date of the Ex­ odus," and in October, 1917, one on " The Date of the Exo­ dus and the Chronology of Judges." Now Mr. Wiener claims to have shown in his first artkle that the Israelites were defeated by the Egyptian Pharaoh, Merneptah, in the fifth year of his reign, being overthrown outside of Egypt somewhere between its eastern border and the southern border of Canaan. In his second article Mr. Wiener claims to have shown that the Exodus of Israel from Egypt took place in the second year of Merneptah's reign. In other words, Mr. Wiener claims to have shown that the defeat of Israel which is mentioned on the celebrated Mer­ neptah stele took place after the Exodus, and while the Israelites were yet in the wilderness. In opposition to Mr. Wiener's assertions stands a previous statement by the well-known scholars Professors Harris and Chapman, that "a recently-deciphered Egyptian inscription ... shows that the Beqe-Israel were already in Palestine at the time of the Exodus, so that the migration must have been partial and not national" (" Exodus and Journey to Ca­ naan." HDB, vol. i. p. 802). The discoverer of this Egyptian stele, Professor Petrie, Digitized by Google 544 The Exodus in the Light of ArcMology. [Oct. views the defeat of "Israel," to which reference is made on 'this stele, as an overthrow which took place in Palestine while the histork Israel had not yet fled from Egypt (Cont.
    [Show full text]
  • Joshua 8:1-35 Calvary Baptist Church Sunday, January 14, 2018 Pastor Ben Marshall
    Joshua: All In Passage: Joshua 8:1-35 Calvary Baptist Church Sunday, January 14, 2018 Pastor Ben Marshall Key Goals: (Know) We know that God desires us to be all in for Him. (Feel) We feel a compelling desire to go all in for God. (Do) We will go all in for God. Welcome Have you ever been in a conversation with someone, but you were slightly distracted? For whatever reason, you were not fully invested in the conversation—you had your phone out, or happened to be checking your email or Facebook status, or the TV was on next to you, or you were in a hurry, or you just didn’t really want to be part of the conversation. But then, all of a sudden, there is this awkward silence and you realize the person you were talking to is waiting on a response… Yeah, I’ve never been there either. Just kidding. It happens probably too often to me. It seems to take a lot for us to be all in for something. We have to actually want something, or want what it can give us. We tend to be all in for things like our favorite football team, favorite coffee shop, favorite brand of technology (obviously Apple is the best), and things like that. We become great evangelists and preachers for what we are passionate about. There’s something different when it comes to how we approach spiritual matters. We feel awkward talking about them, almost ashamed that we read the Bible and learned something or went to church and heard something that transformed our lives.
    [Show full text]