Carolina Red-Backed Vole Myodes Gapperi Carolinensis [Formerly Clethrionomys Gapperi Carolinensis]

Supplemental Volume: Species of Conservation Concern SC SWAP 2015 Carolina Red-backed Vole Myodes gapperi carolinensis [formerly Clethrionomys gapperi carolinensis] Contributors (2005): Edward Pivorun (Clemson University) and Mary Bunch (SCDNR) Reviewed and Edited 92013): Edward Pivorun (Clemson University) DESCRIPTION Photos by E.B. Pivorun Taxonomy and Basic Description The red-backed vole was first described by Vigors in 1830 (Gapper 1930) and is a member of the group of rodents termed microtine or arvicoline rodents. This species is readily distinguished from the other voles in South Carolina by the presence of a reddish dorsal pelage, with grayish sides and a silvery white to pale yellow underside pelage. The reddish color is usually present as a broad band running from the forehead to the rump. The tail is bicolored. The ears are relatively prominent and extend above the fur. Females possess eight mammae. Young voles are gray until their post-juvenile molt, which occurs at approximately 30 days of age. There is no sexual dimorphism. Adult length is 116 to 172 mm (4.57 to 6.77 in.) with a tail length of 30 to 50 mm (1.18 to 1.98 in.). Adult weight varies from 14 to 42 g (0.49 to 1.48 oz.). In general, the animals from the Appalachians are larger than their northern counterparts (Whitaker and Hamilton 1998). The skull has a short rostrum, large auditory bullae, and the palate ends posteriorly as a straight, transverse shelf in contrast to the structure of the palate of other microtines. The subspecies of red-backed vole that occurs in South Carolina is the Carolina red-backed vole, Myodes gapperi carolinensis (formerly Clethrionomys gapperi carolinensis. This subspecies is present in the Appalachian Mountains from northern Georgia north through eastern Tennessee, western North Carolina, the northwest corner of South Carolina, western Virginia and West Virginia. The separation line between Myodes gapperi carolinensis and Myodes gapperi gapperi is farther to the north in Virginia and West Virginia (Whitaker and Hamilton 1998). Status This species is tracked by the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR) Heritage Trust database and is of special concern in South Carolina. The state rank for the red-backed vole is imperiled/vulnerable (S2/S3), which indicates it is rare; the factor that makes the species vulnerable is the limitation of suitable habitat within South Carolina. Supplemental Volume: Species of Conservation Concern SC SWAP 2015 This species has a global rank of secure (G5) (NatureServe 2013). The red-backed vole is apparently secure in West Virginia, Tennessee and North Carolina (NatureServe 2013). Georgia and Kentucky have designated it as vulnerable (S3). Southern red-backed voles are included on the IUCN Red List as a species at lower risk /least concern (Cook and Kirkland, Jr. 1998; Lizney and NatureServe 2008), because the species is widespread, common, and no major threats have been noted across most of its range. POPULATION SIZE AND DISTRIBUTION The southern red-backed vole is distributed throughout Canada and the northern tier of states in the US. The range of this species extends south in the Appalachian Mountains to northern Georgia (Wharton and White 1967; Merritt 1981). Carolina Red-backed Vole Distribution There are no population estimates available in the southern Appalachian Mountains, which represent the southern end of the red-backed vole’s range. However, trapping records from collections in Highlands, North Carolina and the Smoky Mountains National Park indicate that this species can attain high densities and maintain viable populations in suitable habitats (Pivorun, pers. obs). In addition, the population was observed to cycle over 5 to 8 year intervals in the Highlands, North Carolina National Forest lands (Pivorun, pers. obs.); 6 to 10 year cycles (Patric 1962; Grant 1976) and 4.4 year cycles (Elias et al. 2006) have been observed in other localities. There is such a paucity of trapping records from South Carolina that no data are available on population cycles. The red-backed vole is restricted to the higher elevation habitats of South Carolina within the Southern Appalachians Ecoregion. Currently, the only published records for this species are from Oconee (Pivorun et al. 1984) and Pickens Counties (Laerm et al. 1995). Suitable habitat for the Carolina red-backed vole is present in Greenville County. Current population studies are not being conducted on the distribution and abundance of this species in South Carolina. This species was one of the most abundant mammals on the summit of Mt. Rogers in western Virginia (Linzey 1998); the higher density populations are usually located at altitudes above 610 to 915 m (2,000 to 3,000 ft.) in the Southern Appalachians. In the eastern states population size ranged from 24-65 individuals/hectare (or per 2.5 acres) in New York (Fisher 1968); 0-37 per hectare in Connecticut and Vermont (Miller and Getz 1977a). The majority of suitable habitat in South Carolina is limited and one would expect smaller population numbers in this state. The presence of voles in South Carolina may also be dependent upon immigration of voles to South Carolina from higher altitudes in the North Carolina mountains when population cycles result in high densities there. A recent study has shown that since many Southern Appalachian populations of this species are located on “sky islands”, or high altitude locations separated by lower altitude Supplemental Volume: Species of Conservation Concern SC SWAP 2015 valleys or “oceans” of unsuitable habitat, a relatively low genetic variability and a high degree of inbreeding is occurring in these isolated populations (Browne and Ferree 2007). Comparable situations have been noted for the boreal habitat-dependent Southern Appalachian Desmognathus wright, the dwarf salamander (Crespi et al. 2003) and Glaucomys sabrinus, the northern flying squirrel (Arbogast et al. 2005). This results in limited gene flow between various insular populations. The effect of this bottlenecking could result in the loss of local populations due to stochastic fluctuations in climatic conditions or resource availability (Bonnell and Selander 1974; Hartl and Clark 1997). Predators of red-backed voles include snakes, owls, foxes, bobcats, coyote and weasels. Although these voles are prey of several species, survival of the red-backed vole population is usually not threatened by these predators. HABITAT AND NATURAL COMMUNITY REQUIREMENTS The red-backed vole is found in the Southern Appalachians Ecoregion. Within that ecoregion, the vole can be found in habitat with mesic mixed forests, mesic deciduous hardwood, and high altitude coniferous forests and beech gaps. A mesic environment with an abundance of litter, rotting logs, moss covered rocks, exposed roots and rock crevices would be considered an ideal habitat (Miller and Getz 1977b; Merritt 1981). This species has also been observed on mountain balds and in rhododendrom thickets (Pivorun, per obs.). Generally, the presence of a bog area or streambed at altitudes above 762 m (2,500 ft.) offers an appropriate habitat (Webster et al. 1985). Neither forest age nor successional stage has been reported as critical factors in determining habitat preference (Merritt 1981). Red-backed voles do not colonize post burn communities as readily as other species (Martell and Radvanyi 1977), but will inhabit clear cuts (Kirkland 1990; Schloyer 1977; Martell 1983; Monthey and Soutiere 1985). One study in Wyoming demonstrated that C. gapperi clearly preferred forest to harvested stands on all study sites and avoided crossing boundaries between those stands (Keinath and Hayward 2003). In South Carolina, red-backed voles have only been found in Oconee and Pickens County at altitudes above 915 m (3,000 ft.) in mixed deciduous forests associated with boggy and stream bed habitats that contain rhododendron. In the Southern Appalachians, associated species include the woodland jumping mouse (Napaeozapus insignis), star-nosed mole (Condylura cristata), the hairy-tailed mole (Parscalops breweri), smoky shrew (Sorex fumeus) and masked shrew (Sorex cinereus) (Watts 1970). Home range varies from 0.25 to 3.5 acres (Merritt and Merritt 1978). Experimentation by Gillis and Nams (1998) suggests that populations separated by an inter-patch distance of 60-70 m (197-230 ft.) would likely be considered isolated from one another. The red-backed vole is semifossorial and utilizes underground tunnels of other species such as shrews and moles for den and nest sites; they also use crevices among exposed roots and rocks for these purposes. These voles forage along the ground and around downed trees. This vole is omnivorous and opportunistic, consuming nuts, berries, mosses, lichens, ferns, fungi, arthropods and seeds (Merritt 1981). There is very little known about the use of subterranean fungi use by this species in the Southern Supplemental Volume: Species of Conservation Concern SC SWAP 2015 Appalachians. One study in Virginia demonstrated the consistent presence of spores in fecal pellets suggesting that fungi are an important food item and that C. gapperi may be an important disperser of fungal spores. This work supports the notion that C. gapperi is a fungal generalist since spores from the genera Melanogaster, Coprinus, Elaphomyces and Glomalean were present in fecal pellets. In addition, fungi are considered a primary food source for populations inhabiting forests in New York (Fisher 1968). Up to 20-40% of the total food consumed was the fungus Endogone and related hypogeous species during the fall and summer; during the winter months, some individuals were found to have stomach contents that were 100% fungal. Bark and roots are also an important food source during the winter months CHALLENGES Since this vole is located on a multitude of protected areas across its range in North America and since no widespread declines in populations have been noted, this species is generally not considered of conservation concern (Lizney and NatureServe 2008). However, in South Carolina, it is rare and considered worthy of inclusion in the SWAP.

Load more