Vole Stranglers and Lemming Cycles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vole Stranglers and Lemming Cycles P ERSPECTIVES cur on length scales far below those that are tiny, with diameters on the order of 10–19 m, will provide enhanced sensitivity to the pu- currently accessible. The most promising and evaporate explosively after only 10–27 s. tative microscopic black holes (12, 13). The approach is to look not for small effects at Today’s particle colliders are not suffi- Large Hadron Collider, currently under con- relatively large length scales, but for large ciently energetic to produce microscopic struction in Geneva, will provide an even effects at the smallest possible length black holes. However, ultrahigh-energy higher sensitivity to large extra dimensions. scales, where gravity is predicted to be cosmic rays have been observed to collide If no anomalous effects are seen in these strong. These probes are equally powerful with particles in Earth’s atmosphere with ambitious projects, the possibility of large for any n. For low n, they are superseded by center-of-mass energies that are 100 times extra dimensions will be excluded. If seen those discussed above, but for large n, they those available at human-made colliders. and confirmed, however, these effects will provide the leading experimental tests. The ultrahigh-energy neutrinos that are ex- provide the first evidence for strong gravity Perhaps the most remarkable possibility pected to accompany these cosmic rays and a radically new view of spacetime. for testing large n has been the realization may create microscopic black holes. that if gravity is strong at 10–19 m, tiny black Although these black holes are extremely References holes may form in high-energy particle col- short-lived and hence impossible to detect 1. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. R. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 429, 263 (1998). lisions (5–8). The formation of a black hole directly, their explosive evaporations pro- 2. E. G. Adelberger et al., http://arXiv.org/abs/hep- is expected when a large mass or, equiva- duce events with unusual properties (7, 8). ex/0202008 (2002). lently, a large energy is concentrated in a The fact that no such events have been ob- 3. S. Cullen, M. Perelstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 268 (1999). small volume (9, 10). In the conventional 3D served so far places strong constraints on 4. L. J. Hall, D. R. Smith, Phys. Rev. D 60, 085008 (1999). 5. S. B. Giddings, S. Thomas, Phys. Rev. D 65, 056010 world, gravity is so weak that the required large extra dimensions, but does not yet ex- (2002). energy density is never achieved in observ- clude these scenarios altogether (11). 6. S. Dimopoulos, G. Landsberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, able particle collisions. However, if large ex- The search for large extra dimensions 161602 (2001). 7. J. L. Feng, A. D. Shapere, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 021303 tra dimensions exist and gravity is intrinsi- will intensify. The currently operating (2001). cally strong, very high energy particles occa- Antarctic Muon and Neutrino Detector 8. L. A. Anchordoqui, H. Goldberg, Phys. Rev. D 65, sionally pass close enough to each other to Array and its successor IceCube are kilome- 047502 (2002). 9. D. M. Eardley, S. B. Giddings, Phys. Rev. D 66, 044011 trigger gravitational collapse, forming mi- ter-scale cosmic neutrino detectors buried (2002). croscopic black holes. Like conventional deep in the Antarctic ice. The Auger 10. H.Yoshino,Y. Nambu, Phys. Rev. D 66, 065004 (2002). black holes, these black holes are expected to Observatory, consisting of water Cerenkov 11. L. A. Anchordoqui et al., http://arXiv.org/abs/hep- emit “Hawking radiation,” which leads to the detectors covering a 3000-km2 area in the ph/0307228 (2003). 12. M. Kowalski, A. Ringwald, H. Tu, Phys. Lett. B 529,1 evaporation of the black holes. In contrast to high desert of Argentina, will also begin op- (2002). the astrophysical variety, however, they are eration in 2 to 3 years. These large projects 13. J. Alvarez-Muniz et al., Phys. Rev. D 65, 124015 (2002). ECOLOGY specialist predator hypothesis, which postu- lates that small mammal populations undergo periodic fluctuations in numbers in response Vole Stranglers to predation by a specialized predator (4). This hypothesis has taken center stage be- and Lemming Cycles cause the fundamental theory of predator- prey interactions—encapsulated in the wor- Peter J. Hudson and Ottar N. Bjørnstad thy Lotka-Volterra model—predicts cycles in prey and predator abundance. Hence, it is or more than 80 years, population ecol- (Dicrostonyx groelandicus) in northeastern natural to consider that a predator (or some ogists have been preoccupied with the Greenland and describe how these dynam- other specialist consumer) is the crucial play- Frise and fall in population numbers ics are affected by predators. The mathemat- er in the cyclic dynamics of small mammal among small mammal species, but they still ical model that the investigators develop il- populations. At a more detailed level, theory cannot agree on the reasons for these cyclic lustrates how the cyclic fluctuations of col- predicts that interactions between a special- variations in abundance. The controversy lared lemmings are driven by predation by ized predator and its main prey—such as the arises from three central questions: What the lemming specialist, the stoat, and then stoat’s predation of collared lemmings— are the ecological mechanisms that generate are molded (when lemming populations should result in cycles in which the peak in fluctuations in these cycles? Are these reach high densities) by three generalist predator numbers lags behind that of its prey mechanisms common to all cyclic popula- predators: the arctic fox, the snowy owl, and by one-quarter of a cycle (4). This prediction tions? Does understanding of these mecha- the long-tailed skua (see the figure). The is beautifully borne out by the Gilg et al. nisms allow us to explain why some popula- new work answers the first question and study (1). Indeed, this is one of those rare in- tions are cyclic whereas others are not? The provides key insights into the third question. stances when nature appears to reflect basic debate has been so heated among small The saying “Lemmings cycle—unless theory—a textbook case. mammal researchers that other ecologists they don’t” (2) embodies the enigma of One important feature of the specialist jokingly refer to them as the “vole stran- cyclic fluctuations in many lemming and predator hypothesis is that a second stabiliz- glers.” On page 866 of this issue, Gilg et al. vole populations inhabiting boreal and arctic ing effect is needed at high lemming densi- (1) present their long-term field study of the ecosystems. The collared lemming is an ex- ties to slow down the growth rate of the prey cyclic dynamics of collared lemmings cellent example: Some populations exhibit and allow the specialist predator to catch up violent and periodic fluctuations in their and drive prey abundance downward (5). numbers, whereas others exhibit no clear sta- The collared lemming is, again, a wonderful P. J. Hudson is in the Department of Biology and O. N. tistical pattern (3). The “vole stranglers” have illustration. The cyclic fluctuations in lem- Bjørnstad is in the Departments of Entomology and Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University come up with many hypotheses to account ming populations in northeastern Greenland Park, PA 16802, USA. E-mail: [email protected] for this paradox. A favorite is the so-called appear to result from the tension between the www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 302 31 OCTOBER 2003 797 P ERSPECTIVES destabilizing force of the specialist predator AB and the stabilizing effects of three generalist predators. The three generalist predators fo- cus their predation on the lemmings only when populations of these rodents reach high densities. There is such a tight relationship between predator and prey that, as indeed the authors argue, these population fluctuations can be understood without having to invoke food availability, competition, or social inter- actions. In contrast, the noncyclic lemming populations in Arctic Canada appear to be CD trapped in a “generalist predator pit” where a complex guild of predators prohibits any in- creases in the lemming population (3). Taken together, such biogeographic comparisons provide critical insights into how the conse- quences of predator-prey (or, more generally, consumer-resource) interactions are affected by embedding in diverse food webs—that is, how predator-prey interactions are influ- enced by further consumer or competitive in- teractions (6, 7). A choice of predator. The cyclic dynamics of collared lemming populations are determined by a range Of course, there is a difference between of predators. In northeastern Greenland, the collared lemming (A) undergoes cyclic fluctuations in abun- consistency of models and biological ground dance as a consequence of predation by the lemming specialist, the stoat (B). However, lemming popu- truth. The next step in the study of the col- lations could escape control by the stoat if it were not for the stabilizing predation of three generalist lared lemmings is to use experimental ma- predators: the snowy owl (C), the arctic fox (D), and the long-tailed skua (not shown). nipulation of the rates of lemming predation to test the hypothesis mooted by Gilg and ed by the Popperian approach of hypothesis predator-prey ecosystems in the world—the colleagues [e.g., (8, 9)]. Such experimental falsification and with one experimental falsi- Serengeti plains of Tanzania in East manipulations will provide a test of the theo- fication have “thrown a general hypothesis Africa—we start to see some interesting pat- ry and will reveal how to further refine the out with local idiosyncrasies.” A clear illus- terns. A recent study (16) provides evidence theoretical model. Sadly, ecologists rarely tration of geographic differences regarding that the abundance of small herbivores in have the resources to “grasp the nettle” and causes of population cycles is provided by tropical Africa is determined principally go for such large-scale experiments.
Recommended publications
  • Non-Target Species Hazard Or Brodifacoum Use in Orchards for Meadow Vole Control
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Eastern Pine and Meadow Vole Symposia for March 1981 NON-TARGET SPECIES HAZARD OR BRODIFACOUM USE IN ORCHARDS FOR MEADOW VOLE CONTROL Mark H. Merson Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Winchester, Virginia Ross E. Byers Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Winchester, Virginia Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/voles Part of the Environmental Health and Protection Commons Merson, Mark H. and Byers, Ross E., "NON-TARGET SPECIES HAZARD OR BRODIFACOUM USE IN ORCHARDS FOR MEADOW VOLE CONTROL" (1981). Eastern Pine and Meadow Vole Symposia. 58. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/voles/58 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Eastern Pine and Meadow Vole Symposia by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. NON-TARGET SPECIES HAZARD OF BRODIFACOUM USE IN ORCHARDS FOR MEADOW VOLE CONTROL Mark H. Merson and Ross E. Byers Winchester Fruit Research Laboratory Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Winchester, Virginia 22601 This year we entered into our second year of non-target species hazard assessment of Brodifacoum used (BFC; ICI Americas, Inc.) as an orchard rodenticide. The primary emphasis of this work has been to in- vestigate the effects of BFC on birds of prey through secondary poison- ing. The hazard level of BFC to raptors should be dependent on the levels found in post-treatment collections of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus).
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for the Amargosa Vole
    Recovery Plan for the Amargosa Vole (Microtus californicus scirpensis) ( As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the ~ Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use ofour land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environ mental and cultural values of our national parks ~, and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energyand mineral resourcesand works toassure that ~‘ theirdevelopment is in the best interests ofall our people. ~4 The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people ~<‘ who live in island Territories under U.S. administration. AMARGOSA VOLE (Microtus cahfornicus scirpensis) RECOVERY PLAN September, 1997 7— U.S. Department ofthe Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Region One, Portland, Oregon DISCLAIMER PAGE Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance ofrecovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director or Director as approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Mather Field Vernal Pools California Vole
    Mather Field Vernal Pools common name California Vole scientific name Microtus californicus phylum Chordata class Mammalia order Rodentia family Muridae habitat common in grasslands, wetlands Jack Kelly Clark, © University of California Regents and wet meadows size up to 14 cm long excluding tail description The California Vole is covered with grayish-brown fur. Its ears and legs are short and it has pale feet. It has a cylindrical shape (like a toilet paper roll) with a tail that is 1/3 the length of the body. fun facts California Voles make paths through the grasslands leading to the mouths of their underground burrows. These surface "runways" are worn into the grass by daily travel. When chased by a predator, a vole can make a fast dash for the safety of its underground burrow using these cleared runways. If you walk quickly across the grassland you will often surprise a California Vole and see it scurry to its burrow. life cycle California Voles reach maturity in one month. Female voles have litters of four to eight young. In areas with abundant food and mild weather, each female can have up to five litters in a year. ecology The California Vole can dig its own underground burrow system but it often begins by using Pocket Gopher burrows. The tunnels are usually 1 to 5 meters long and up to one half meter below ground, with a nesting den somewhere inside. The ends of the burrows are left open. Many insects, spiders, centipedes, and other animals live in their burrows. Thus, the California Vole creates habitat for other species and the Pocket Gopher improves habitat for the vole.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Bog Lemming, Synaptomys Cooperi,Andthe Mammals: Their Natural History, Classification, and Meadow Vole, Microtus Pennsylvanicus,Invirginia
    Synaptomys cooperi (Baird, 1858) SBLE W. Mark Ford and Joshua Laerm CONTENT AND TAXONOMIC COMMENTS There are eight subspecies of the southern bog lem- ming (Synaptomys cooperi) recognized, four of which occur in the South: S. c. gossii, S. c. helaletes, S. c. kentucki, and S. c. stonei (Wetzel 1955, Barbour 1956, Hall 1981, Linzey 1983, Long 1987). However, Whitaker and Hamilton (1998) indicate that S. c. gossii, S. c. kentucki, and S. c. stonei could be referable to S. c. cooperi.The literature was reviewed by Linzey (1983). DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS The southern bog lemming is a robust, short-tailed vole with a broad head, small ears, and small eyes. Its measurements are: total length, 119–154 mm; tail, 13–25 mm; hind foot, 16–24 mm; ear, 8–14 mm; weight, 20–50 g. The dental formula for this species is: I 1/1, C 0/0, P 0/0, M 3/3 = 16 (Figure 1). The pel- age is bright chestnut to dark grizzled brown dor- sally, grading into silver grayish white ventrally, with gray to brown feet and tail. The southern bog lemming readily is distinguished from other voles by its short tail (usually less than hind foot length), pres- ence of a shallow longitudinal groove along upper incisors, and deep reentrant angles on molars. See keys for details. CONSERVATION STATUS The southern bog lemming has a global rank of Secure (NatureServe 2007). It is listed as Secure in Virginia and Apparently Secure in Kentucky and Tennessee. It is listed as Vulnerable in North Carolina, Imperiled in Arkansas, and Critically Imperiled in Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Effectiveness of Lure in Capturing Northern Bog Lemmings on Trail Cameras Keely Benson [email protected]
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Undergraduate Theses and Professional Papers 2019 Effectiveness of Lure in Capturing Northern Bog Lemmings on Trail Cameras Keely Benson [email protected] Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/utpp Part of the Other Animal Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Benson, Keely, "Effectiveness of Lure in Capturing Northern Bog Lemmings on Trail Cameras" (2019). Undergraduate Theses and Professional Papers. 248. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/utpp/248 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Theses and Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Effectiveness of Lure in Capturing Northern Bog Lemmings on Trail Cameras Keely Benson Wildlife Biology Program University of Montana Senior Thesis Project Graduating May 4, 2019 with a Bachelor of Science in Wildlife Biology Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements of a Senior Honors Thesis WILD499/HONR499 Wildlife Biology Program The University of Montana Missoula, Montana Approved by: Committee Chair: Dr. Mark Hebblewhite, Wildlife Biology Program, University of Montana Committee Members: Dr. Mike Mitchell, Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, University of Montana Dr. Chad Bishop, Wildlife Biology Program University of Montana 1 Effectiveness of Lure in Capturing Northern Bog Lemmings on Trail Cameras Keely Benson Abstract Fens and bogs are unique wetlands that support a diversity of small mammals and many other rare species.
    [Show full text]
  • Cycles and Synchrony in the Collared Lemming (Dicrostonyx Groenlandicus) in Arctic North America
    Oecologia (2001) 126:216–224 DOI 10.1007/s004420000516 Martin Predavec · Charles J. Krebs · Kjell Danell Rob Hyndman Cycles and synchrony in the Collared Lemming (Dicrostonyx groenlandicus) in Arctic North America Received: 11 January 2000 / Accepted: 21 August 2000 / Published online: 19 October 2000 © Springer-Verlag 2000 Abstract Lemming populations are generally character- Introduction ised by their cyclic nature, yet empirical data to support this are lacking for most species, largely because of the Lemmings are generally known for their multiannual time and expense necessary to collect long-term popula- density fluctuations known as cycles. Occurring in a tion data. In this study we use the relative frequency of number of different species, these cycles are thought to yearly willow scarring by lemmings as an index of lem- have a fairly regular periodicity between 3 and 5 years, ming abundance, allowing us to plot population changes although the amplitude of the fluctuations can vary dra- over a 34-year period. Scars were collected from 18 sites matically. The collared lemming, Dicrostonyx groen- in Arctic North America separated by 2–1,647 km to in- landicus, is no exception, with earlier studies suggesting vestigate local synchrony among separate populations. that this species shows a strong cyclic nature in its popu- Over the period studied, populations at all 18 sites lation fluctuations (e.g. Chitty 1950; Shelford 1943). showed large fluctuations but there was no regular peri- However, later studies have shown separate populations odicity to the patterns of population change. Over all to be cyclic (Mallory et al. 1981; Pitelka and Batzli possible combinations of pairs of sites, only sites that 1993) or with little or no population fluctuations (Krebs were geographically connected and close (<6 km) et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Collared Lemming 5/18/2005
    NORTHERN COLLARED LEMMING and ALASKA SUBSPECIES Dicrostonyx groenlandicus Traill, 1823 (Muridae) Global rank G5 (22Jun2000) D. g. exsul G5T3 (14Mar2006) D. g. unalascensis G5T3 (26Apr2001) D. g. stevensoni G5T3 (14Mar2006) State rank S4 (14Mar2006) State rank reasons D. groenlandicus is widespread in western coastal Alaska throughout Aleutian Archipelago; insular populations restricted to St. Lawrence, Umnak, and Unalaska Islands. Suspected of a superspecies complex among North periodic high abundance although overall American Dicrostonyx (Rausch and Rausch abundance unknown; likely fluctuates, although 1972, Rausch 1977, also see Krohne 1982). trends in periodicity are difficult to determine. Former subspecies occurring in western Canada High summer predation and effects of climate and Alaska were recognized as separate species change on species’ habitat are potential threats. based mainly on karyotypes (Rausch and Rausch 1972, Rausch 1977, Krohne 1982, Honacki et al. Subspecies of concern ranked below: 1982, Baker et al. 2003). Musser and Carleton D. g. exsul: S3 (14Mar2006) (1993) noted, however, that although D. Insular taxa; state endemic with restricted groenlandicus, D. hudsonius, D. richardsoni, and range (St. Lawrence Island); current status D. unalascensis are morphologically distinct, the unknown; suspected periodic high distinctness of D. kilangmiutak, D. nelsoni, and D. abundance; population trend unknown. There rubricatus is more subtle and in need of further are no obvious threats at present. However, careful study. Jarrell and Fredga (1993) and due to its isolated and restricted habitat, this Engstrom (1999) suggest treating D. hudsonius, subspecies may be vulnerable to introduced D. richardsoni, and D. groenlandicus as full threats (e.g., rats). species (the latter including the other North American populations as subspecies).
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat, Home Range, Diet and Demography of the Water Vole (Arvicola Amphibious): Patch-Use in a Complex Wetland Landscape
    _________________________________________________________________________Swansea University E-Theses Habitat, home range, diet and demography of the water vole (Arvicola amphibious): Patch-use in a complex wetland landscape. Neyland, Penelope Jane How to cite: _________________________________________________________________________ Neyland, Penelope Jane (2011) Habitat, home range, diet and demography of the water vole (Arvicola amphibious): Patch-use in a complex wetland landscape.. thesis, Swansea University. http://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa42744 Use policy: _________________________________________________________________________ This item is brought to you by Swansea University. Any person downloading material is agreeing to abide by the terms of the repository licence: copies of full text items may be used or reproduced in any format or medium, without prior permission for personal research or study, educational or non-commercial purposes only. The copyright for any work remains with the original author unless otherwise specified. The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder. Permission for multiple reproductions should be obtained from the original author. Authors are personally responsible for adhering to copyright and publisher restrictions when uploading content to the repository. Please link to the metadata record in the Swansea University repository, Cronfa (link given in the citation reference above.) http://www.swansea.ac.uk/library/researchsupport/ris-support/ Habitat, home range, diet and demography of the water vole(Arvicola amphibius): Patch-use in a complex wetland landscape A Thesis presented by Penelope Jane Neyland for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Conservation Ecology Research Team (CERTS) Department of Biosciences College of Science Swansea University ProQuest Number: 10807513 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Chromosome Translocations
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Rapid Karyotype Evolution in Lasiopodomys Involved at Least Two Autosome ± Sex Chromosome Translocations Olga L. Gladkikh1☯, Svetlana A. Romanenko1,2☯*, Natalya A. Lemskaya1, Natalya A. Serdyukova1, Patricia C. M. O'Brien3, Julia M. Kovalskaya4, Antonina V. Smorkatcheva5, Feodor N. Golenishchev6, Polina L. Perelman1,2, Vladimir A. Trifonov1,2, Malcolm A. Ferguson-Smith3, Fengtang Yang7, Alexander S. Graphodatsky1,2 a11111 1 Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia, 2 Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia, 3 Cambridge Resource Centre for Comparative Genomics, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 4 Severtzov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, 5 Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia, 6 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia, 7 Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. OPEN ACCESS * [email protected] Citation: Gladkikh OL, Romanenko SA, Lemskaya NA, Serdyukova NA, O'Brien PCM, Kovalskaya JM, et al. (2016) Rapid Karyotype Evolution in Abstract Lasiopodomys Involved at Least Two Autosome ± Sex Chromosome Translocations. PLoS ONE 11 The generic status of Lasiopodomys and its division into subgenera Lasiopodomys (L. man- (12): e0167653. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0167653 darinus, L. brandtii) and Stenocranius (L. gregalis, L. raddei) are not generally accepted because of contradictions between the morphological and molecular data. To obtain cyto- Editor: Igor V. Sharakhov, Virginia Tech, UNITED STATES genetic evidence for the Lasiopodomys genus and its subgenera and to test the autosome to sex chromosome translocation hypothesis of sex chromosome complex origin in L.
    [Show full text]
  • Myodes Gapperi) in New Hampshire Forests
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Master's Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Fall 2018 HOME RANGE AND MICROHABITAT ASSOCIATIONS OF THE SOUTHERN RED-BACKED VOLE (MYODES GAPPERI) IN NEW HAMPSHIRE FORESTS Honora Tisell University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis Recommended Citation Tisell, Honora, "HOME RANGE AND MICROHABITAT ASSOCIATIONS OF THE SOUTHERN RED-BACKED VOLE (MYODES GAPPERI) IN NEW HAMPSHIRE FORESTS" (2018). Master's Theses and Capstones. 1212. https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis/1212 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses and Capstones by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOME RANGE AND MICROHABITAT ASSOCIATIONS OF THE SOUTHERN RED- BACKED VOLE (MYODES GAPPERI) IN NEW HAMPSHIRE FORESTS BY HONORA BARBARA TISELL Bachelor of Science in Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, 2014 THESIS Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Natural Resources: Wildlife and Conservation Biology September, 2018 This thesis has been examined and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Natural Resources: Wildlife and Conservation Biology by: Thesis Director, Dr. Rebecca Rowe, Associate Professor, Natural Resources and the Environment Dr. Allyson Degrassi, Post-doctoral Researcher, Natural Resources and the Environment Dr. Russell G.
    [Show full text]
  • Kangaroo Rat and Pocket Mouse
    Shrew Family Order Rodentia (Soricoidae) masked shrew vagrant shrew water shrew Sorex cinereus Sorex vagrans Sorex palustris grassland streambank streambank Mouse, Vole, Rats, and Muskrat (Cricetidae) meadow vole long-tailed vole heather vole Microtus pennsylvanicu Microtus longicaudus Phenacomys intermedius grassland streambank streambank/grassland/mountain Gapper’s red-backed vole deer mouse Western harvest mouse Clethrionomys gapperi Peromycus maniculatus Reithrodontomys megalotis mountain mountain/streambank grassland bushy-tailed woodrat Neotoma cinerea mountain rock mouse Northern grasshopper mouse Peromyscus difficilis Onychomys leucogaster mountain grassland Jumping Mouse Kangaroo Rat and Family Pocket Mouse silky pocket mouse (Zapodidae) (Heteromyidae) Perognathus flavus desert Western jumping mouse Ord’s kangaroo rat Apache pocket mouse Zapus princeps Dipodomys ordii Perognathus apache streambank desert mountain 1:1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 inches 1 - Rodents Tracks are actual size. Pocket Gopher Porcupine Family Order Rodentia Family (Erethizonidae) (Geomyidae) Beaver Family (Castoridae) porcupine Erethizon dorsatum mountains/grasslands scale 1:3 beaver Castor canadensis streams/lakes/wetlands Northern pocket gopher scale 1:3 Thomomys talpoides grasslands scale 1:1 1:3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 inches Squirrel Family (Sciuridae) least chipmunk Colorado chipmunk chicaree Eutamias minimus Eutamias quadrivittatus Tamiasciurus douglassi mountain/grassland mountain forest Abert’s squirrel Sciurus aberti kaibabensis mountain/forest rock ground squirrel golden-mantled ground Spermophilus variegatus squirrel mountain Spermophilus lateralis streambank yellow-bellied marmot Gunnison’s prairie dog thirteen-lined ground squirrel Marmota flaviventris Cynomys gunnisoni Spermophilus tridecemlineatus mountain/rockslide grassland grassland 1:1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 inches 2 - Rodents Rodentia tracks vary in size. Sciuridae tracks are actual size.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlling Vole Damage Stephen M
    ® ® University of Nebraska–Lincoln Extension, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources Know how. Know now. G887 (Revised September 2011) Controlling Vole Damage Stephen M. Vantassel, Extension Project Coordinator — Wildlife Damage Management Scott E. Hygnstrom, Extension Specialist — Wildlife Damage Management Dennis M. Ferraro, Extension Educator This NebGuide provides information about voles, the damage they cause, and ways to prevent and control damage problems. Voles are small, mouse-like rodents that exist throughout Nebraska. Though commonly called meadow or field mice, their short tails (about 1 inch long), stocky build, and small eyes distinguish them from true mice (Figure 1). Voles can cause problems by damaging lawns, gardens, tree plantings, and other plants. Vole Facts The prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster), the most com- Figure 1. Prairie vole. (Photo: NEBRASKAland Magazine/Nebraska mon species, occurs statewide. Meadow voles (Microtus Game and Parks Commission.) pennsylvanicus) also are very common but cover a slightly Voles are an important source of food for many preda- smaller geographical area. Pine voles, or woodland voles tors, including snakes, hawks, owls, coyotes, weasels, foxes, (Microtus pinetorum), generally are confined to the south- mink, and badgers. Mortality rates for voles are very high. eastern edge of Nebraska along the Missouri river. Life expectancy in the wild often does not exceed 2 months, Voles are small with adults weighing 1 to 2 ounces. Their with few living longer than 16 months. overall adult body length varies from 4½ to 7 inches in the The breeding season for all voles encompasses most of meadow and prairie voles, to about 3 to 5½ inches in the pine the year with peaks occurring in the spring and fall.
    [Show full text]