DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix C Roadless Area Inventory and Wilderness Evaluation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix C Roadless Area Inventory and Wilderness Evaluation Appendix C Roadless Area Inventory and Wilderness Evaluation Table of Contents Page No. Abstract ..................................................................................................................... C-1 Introduction............................................................................................................... C-2 Part One: The Roadless Inventory Process .............................................................. C-2 Direction for a Roadless Area Inventory and Wilderness Evaluation ................. C-2 Description of the Roadless Area Inventory Criteria........................................... C-4 Application of Selection Criteria – Inventoried Roadless Areas (IRAs) ............. C-8 Part Two: Matrix Summary of Potential IRAs ...................................................... C-10 Summary of Potential Inventoried Roadless Areas ........................................... C-10 Maps of Roadless Review and Inventoried Roadless Areas.............................. C-23 Part Three: The Wilderness Evaluation Process .................................................... C-25 Part Four: Evaluation of Potential Wilderness Areas ............................................. C-31 Consequences of a Wilderness or Non-Wilderness Designation....................... C-31 Big Draft ............................................................................................................ C-37 Canaan Loop ...................................................................................................... C-41 Cheat Mountain.................................................................................................. C-45 Cranberry Expansion.......................................................................................... C-50 Dolly Sods North ............................................................................................... C-54 Dry Fork............................................................................................................. C-59 East Fork Greenbrier.......................................................................................... C-63 Gaudineer ........................................................................................................... C-67 Gauley Mountain East........................................................................................ C-72 Gauley Mountain West ...................................................................................... C-76 Middle Mountain................................................................................................ C-80 Roaring Plains East ............................................................................................ C-84 Roaring Plains North.......................................................................................... C-89 Roaring Plains West........................................................................................... C-93 Seneca Creek...................................................................................................... C-97 Spice Run ......................................................................................................... C-102 Tea Creek Mountain......................................................................................... C-106 Turkey Mountain.............................................................................................. C-110 Roadless Area Conservation Rule Areas .............................................................. C-114 Appendix C Roadless Area Inventory and Wilderness Evaluation ABSTRACT The Appendix C displays the process used to conduct the roadless area inventory and wilderness evaluation for the Monongahela National Forest, Forest Plan Revision and the results of this analysis. This evaluation is divided into four parts: (1) roadless inventory process, (2) matrix summary of potential inventoried roadless areas, (3) The potential inventoried roadless area evaluation process, and (4) wilderness evaluation of inventoried roadless areas. The Roadless Inventory Process used a variety of Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping exercises to initially identify 41 potential inventoried roadless areas (an estimated 326,539 acres). Each of these 41 potential areas was evaluated using the eight criteria for roadless areas east of the 100th meridian. Based on this evaluation, 18 areas (143,234 acres) met the criteria to be included in the new Roadless Area Inventory. A wilderness evaluation based on availability, capability, and need was completed for each of the 18 areas. Below is a summary of areas that met the roadless area criteria: Inventory Result – These 18 areas (143,234 acres) received further evaluation as potential wildernesses because they met the eight criteria for potential wilderness in the East. Area Acres Area Acres Big Draft 5,395 Gauley Mountain West 6,624 Canaan Loop 7,850 Middle Mountain 12,197 Cheat Mountain 7,955 Roaring Plains East 2,962 Cranberry Expansion 12,165 Roaring Plains North 3,119 Dolly Sods North 7,215 Roaring Plains West 6,825 Dry Fork 739 Seneca Creek 24,974 East Fork Greenbrier 10,153 Spice Run 6,171 Gaudineer 6,727 Tea Creek Mountain 8,272 Gauley Mountain East 7,780 Turkey Mountain 6,111 For the action alternatives (2, 2M, 3, and 4) in the Final EIS, management prescriptions were allocated for the 18 areas that were evaluated for wilderness potential as follows: Alternative 2 – Thirteen areas receive a 6.2 Backcountry Recreation prescription, four areas receive a 5.1 Recommended Wilderness prescription, and one area receives a 6.2 and 8.1 SPNM prescription. Alternative 2M – Thirteen areas receive a 6.2 Backcountry Recreation prescription, four areas receive a 5.1 Recommended Wilderness prescription, and one area receives a 6.2 and 8.1 SPNM prescription. Alternative 3 – Eleven areas receive a 5.1 Recommended Wilderness prescription, and the other seven areas receive a 6.2 Backcountry Recreation prescription. Alternative 4 –Six areas receive a 6.2 Backcountry Recreation prescription, six areas receive a 4.1 Spruce-Hardwood Restoration prescription, four areas receive a 6.1 Wildlife Habitat Emphasis prescription, one area receives a mix of 4.1 and 6.1 prescriptions, and one area receives a mix of 6.2 and 8.1 SPNM prescriptions. C - 1 Appendix C Roadless Area Inventory and Wilderness Evaluation INTRODUCTION This appendix displays the process used to conduct a roadless area inventory and wilderness evaluation and the results of that analysis. The planning record document in which the entire roadless inventory and Wilderness evaluation is located is titled, “Monongahela National Forest - Forest Plan Revision Roadless Area Inventory and Wilderness Evaluation.” This document is divided into four parts. Part One describes the inventory process. It displays authorities and requirements, criteria used during inventory, and a detailed description of steps taken on the Monongahela National Forest to accomplish the roadless inventory. All areas inventoried during the RARE II process (Roadless Area Review and Evaluation of 1979), as well as all other Monongahela National Forest System lands were considered in the inventory process. Part Two gives the results of the inventory. It lists each area that met criteria during the inventory process and summarizes results of the inventory criteria measures. Eighteen areas continued into evaluation of Wilderness attributes. Fourteen of those are RARE II inventoried areas and were also mapped as roadless areas in the Forest Service Roadless Area Conservation Final Environmental Impact Statement. Part Three describes the wilderness evaluation process, including an overview of the process and specific criteria to be used to evaluate an area’s capability, availability and need for wilderness. Part Four presents the Wilderness evaluation for each of the areas that met inventory requirements, as listed in Part Two. It also displays the results of the Wilderness evaluation and summarizes how each of the potential Wilderness was considered in alternatives in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Monongahela Forest Plan Revision. PART ONE: THE ROADLESS INVENTORY PROCESS Direction for a Roadless Area Inventory and Wilderness Evaluation Purpose The primary purpose of the roadless area inventory and wilderness evaluation is to determine which areas on the Forest have the best potential for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System. The Forest is identifying this pool of potential areas for Forest Plan revision in order to help develop a range of alternatives for recommended wilderness in the Draft EIS. Recommended wilderness is one of the 6 planning decisions to be made in Forest Plan revision. Although the updated roadless area inventory is replacing roadless inventories of the past (RARE I, RARE II, Roadless Area Conservation Rule areas), this is not an inventory primarily to determine roadless areas but rather part of a process to determine which of those roadless areas have the best potential for wilderness. Therefore, criteria related to wilderness attributes are part of the inventory process, as described by the Forest Service Handbook and Regional direction. For the inventory process, the Forest reviewed every area that would potentially qualify as wilderness under the Wilderness Act of 1964 and the Eastern Wilderness Act of 1975. These areas included: C - 2 Appendix C Roadless Area Inventory and Wilderness Evaluation • RARE II roadless areas • Roadless Area Conservation Rule roadless
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Highlands Conservancy Kicks Off Initiative on Monongahela National Forest
    Volume 39 Number 3 March, 2006 West Virginia Highlands Conservancy: We’re Friends of the Monongahela National Forest HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY KICKS OFF INITIATIVE ON MONONGAHELA NATIONAL FOREST By Dave Saville Within this issue of the Highlands ways, dams, massive clear cutting of the for- forever vigilant, to protect the Mon. Voice, we are kicking off a new Highlands Con- ests, pipelines, power transmission lines, mis- It was the Highlands Conservancy in the servancy program called We’re Friends of the guided management, car races, ATVs, reck- 1960s that led the campaign to protect Dolly Mon! This program will coordinate our current Sods and Otter Creek as Wilderness. We filed efforts on behalf of the Monongahela National a successful lawsuit in the mid 1970s against Forest and gradually expand our work to in- large-scale clear cutting. This famous legal vic- clude more service projects like trail mainte- tory called “The Monongahela Decision” ulti- nance, stream and forest protection and resto- mately catalyzed legislation, sponsored by the ration efforts, and a more concerted effort to West Virginia delegation, called the National educate our membership and encourage their Forest Management Act (NFMA). This law engagement in projects and special uses of the changed how all National Forests would be Mon Forest. managed to this day. It limits the size of clear These are things we’ve always done; cuts and requires each National Forest to have we’re just working to better coordinate these a Management Plan specific to that Forest. efforts and increase our effectiveness. In 1983 a 12-year Highlands Conser- For over 40 years the West Virginia vancy campaign came to a successful conclu- Highlands Conservancy has been working to sion with designation of the Cranberry and Lau- protect and restore, and to help people enjoy rel Fork Wilderness Areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida MSTA Newsletter for May 2020
    The Florida Gator Tale Newsletter of the Florida Chapter of the Motorcycle Sport Touring Association June 2021 - Volume 14 Issue 6 In the June 2021 Issue: Feature Article Page 1 – Feature Article Page 9 – Safety Talk Page 11 – Florida News Page 14 – Florida Rides STAR 2021 Route Guide Page 15 – Future Florida Rides MSTA Page 16 – Florida MSTA Apparel Page 16 – Classified Ads Contact Information: South Florida Director: Van VanSteelant – [email protected] Central Florida Director: Carl Swofford – [email protected] Florida Gator Tale Editor: Kim Longacre – [email protected] For the upcoming STAR 2021 at the Canaan Valley Resort in Davis, West Virginia (June 13-16, 2021), the MSTA offers an online STAR 2021 Route Guide at http://star21.flybyweek.com/RouteGuide.html. This year, in addition to the GPX navigation files, each route includes a link to an online map image and a pdf document of the map and Garmin route that you can download. Super easy!! Here are summary descriptions of each of the 22 STAR routes in the guide: 01 River RunsThru It RouteType: TOURING BIKE-FRIENDLY Navigation difficulty: AVERAGE Distance: 196 miles. Lunch Stop: Apple Annie's near Morgantown, WV Direction from Canaan Valley: NW, N, NE, CLOCKWISE Comments: Something for big bikes, 2-up with some 1.5 lane twisty pavement to work up appetites. This route leans more towards civilization. 02 Smoke Hole to the Knob RouteType: TOURING BIKE-FRIENDLY, DESTINATION- Spruce Knob, CURVY route. Navigation difficulty: AVERAGE Distance: 179 miles. Lunch Stop: Hollow Restaurant in Franklin, WV, and Ice Cream at Moe Fatz if desired.
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-Dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus Spp
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 2005 The aN tural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus spp. Cope (Plethodontidae), in West Virginia Michael Steven Osbourn Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Osbourn, Michael Steven, "The aN tural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus spp. Cope (Plethodontidae), in West Virginia" (2005). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 735. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Natural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus spp. Cope (Plethodontidae), in West Virginia. Thesis submitted to The Graduate College of Marshall University In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Science Biological Sciences By Michael Steven Osbourn Thomas K. Pauley, Committee Chairperson Daniel K. Evans, PhD Thomas G. Jones, PhD Marshall University May 2005 Abstract The Natural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus spp. Cope (Plethodontidae), in West Virginia. Michael S. Osbourn There are over 4000 documented caves in West Virginia, potentially providing refuge and habitat for a diversity of amphibians and reptiles. Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus porphyriticus, are among the most frequently encountered amphibians in caves. Surveys of 25 caves provided expanded distribution records and insight into ecology and diet of G.
    [Show full text]
  • Crayfishes of the Cheat River Watershed in West Virginia and Pennsylvania
    CRAYFISHES OF THE CHEAT RIVER WATERSHED IN WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA. PART II. OBSERVATIONS UPON ECOLOGICAL FACTORS RELATING TO DISTRIBUTION1 FRANK J. SCHWARTZ AND WILLIAM G. MEREDITH Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, Maryland and Ml. St. Mary's College, Emmittsburg, Maryland Schwartz and Meredith (1960) presented as Part I the localities and species of crayfishes (Decapoda) currently found throughout the Cheat River watershed of West Virginia and Pennsylvania. These records indicated that two species, Cambarus bartoni and Orconectes obscurus, now occupy the Cheat system. Litera- ture records occur for Cambarus bartoni carinirostris (Faxon, 1914; Ortmann, 1931) and Cambarus carolinus (Ortmann, 1931) in addition to the forms mentioned. Bick et al. (1953) have reviewed the meager literature relating to the ecology of acid mine streams. Bowden (1961) has called attention to the effects of strip mines on faunal ecologies. The former have also shown the detrimental effects to the fauna and ecology of a Louisiana acid stream after it was altered by channel dredging. A casual scanning of the data will reveal peculiarities in the distributions of the present species. C. bartoni, although taken at 138 stations of the 233 sampled (fig. 1), is absent today from the central portion and a number of the tributaries of the Cheat system. The greatest number of collections was made in the head- waters of the system. 0. obscurus (fig. 2) occurs in only a few of the lower elevation streams, and was absent from the headwaters and central zone of the watershed. C. b. carinirostris (fig. 1), a species once described from the Cheat system and whose center of abundance was believed to be in the Cheat system streams of Randolph, Tucker, and Pocahontas counties (Faxon, 1914), was not found during the present study.
    [Show full text]
  • West Virginia Trail Inventory
    West Virginia Trail Inventory Trail report summarized by county, prepared by the West Virginia GIS Technical Center updated 9/24/2014 County Name Trail Name Management Area Managing Organization Length Source (mi.) Date Barbour American Discovery American Discovery Trail 33.7 2009 Trail Society Barbour Brickhouse Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.55 2013 Barbour Brickhouse Spur Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.03 2013 Barbour Conflicted Desire Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 2.73 2013 Barbour Conflicted Desire Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.03 2013 Shortcut Barbour Double Bypass Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 1.46 2013 Barbour Double Bypass Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.02 2013 Connector Barbour Double Dip Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.2 2013 Barbour Hospital Loop Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.29 2013 Barbour Indian Burial Ground Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.72 2013 Barbour Kid's Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.72 2013 Barbour Lower Alum Cave Trail Audra State Park WV Division of Natural 0.4 2011 Resources Barbour Lower Alum Cave Trail Audra State Park WV Division of Natural 0.07 2011 Access Resources Barbour Prologue Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.63 2013 Barbour River Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 1.26 2013 Barbour Rock Cliff Trail Audra State Park WV Division of Natural 0.21 2011 Resources Barbour Rock Pinch Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 1.51 2013 Barbour Short course Bypass Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.1 2013 Barbour
    [Show full text]
  • Monongahela National Forest
    Monongahela National Forest United States Department of Final Agriculture Environmental Impact Statement Forest Service September for 2006 Forest Plan Revision The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its program and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202)720- 2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (202)720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal Opportunity provider and employer. Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Monongahela National Forest Forest Plan Revision September, 2006 Barbour, Grant, Greebrier, Nicholas, Pendleton, Pocahontas, Preston, Randolph, Tucker, and Webster Counties in West Virginia Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Monongahela National Forest 200 Sycamore Street Elkins, WV 26241 (304) 636-1800 Responsible Official: Randy Moore, Regional Forester Eastern Region USDA Forest Service 626 East Wisconsin Avenue Milwaukee, WI 53203 (414) 297-3600 For Further Information, Contact: Clyde Thompson, Forest Supervisor Monongahela National Forest 200 Sycamore Street Elkins, WV 26241 (304) 636-1800 i Abstract In July 2005, the Forest Service released for public review and comment a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) that described four alternatives for managing the Monongahela National Forest. Alternative 2 was the Preferred Alternative in the DEIS and was the foundation for the Proposed Revised Forest Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Roadless Rule Map & Fact Sheet
    West Virginians for Public Lands The Roadless Rule in West Virginia The “Roadless Rule” was established by the US Forest Service in 2001 after an extensive inventory and mapping of undeveloped public lands. Today the Roadless Rule conserves 44.8 million acres in 37 states. There are 182,000 roadless acres among the three national forests within West Virginia. The Monongahela National Forest has the largest share at 162,000 acres, followed by the George Washington NF (15,700 ac) and the Jefferson NF (4,800 ac). The Monongahela National Forest has over 2,100 miles of roads. Nowhere in West Virginia is further than 3.2 miles as-the-crow-flies from a road. Roadless areas make up less than a fifth of the Monongahela National Forest and just over 1 percent of the state of West Virginia. Roadlessness is a rare and valuable quality for both recreation and wildlife. Roadless areas are often remote backcountry areas. In West Virginia, the vast majority of roadless areas are managed by the Forest Service for recreation and include some of the most iconic landscapes in the state: Roaring Plains, Seneca Creek, Cheat Mountain, Canaan Loop, Tea Creek, North Fork Mountain, and Hills Creek Falls. In many cases our roadless areas adjoin designated Wilderness Areas, creating larger intact ecosystems, providing greater recreation opportunity, and enhancing the “wild and wonderful” qualities of these regions. Dolly Sods, Otter Creek, and Cranberry Wilderness are surrounded by roadless areas. Logging is generally prohibited in roadless areas, but the Roadless Rule does contain practical exceptions: firefighting, personal firewood gathering, and habitat imProvement for rare species are allowed.
    [Show full text]
  • Monongahela National Forest
    Monongahela National Forest Administrative Correction 15 August 12, 2010 Changes to Management Prescription 8.2 Areas Due to New Information Under the 2000 Planning Rule (36 CFR 219.31), the following administrative corrections and additions may be made at any time, are not plan amendments or revisions, and do not require public notice or the preparation of an environmental document under Forest Service NEPA procedures: (1) Corrections and updates of data and maps; (2) Updates to activity lists and schedules as required by § 219.30(d)(1)-(6); (3) Corrections of typographical errors or other non-substantive changes; and (4) Changes in monitoring methods other than those required in a monitoring strategy. The following corrections are a result of new information from the USDI National Park Service about National Natural Landmarks (NNLs) on the Monongahela National Forest (MNF). During a recent visit to inspect NNLs on the MNF, Carolyn Davis of the NPS compared her list of NNLs on the Forest to the Forest Ecologist’s list, and two discrepancies were found. First, the Falls of Hills Creek area was not on the NPS list as an NNL. Second, the Germany Valley Karst Area was on the NPS list but not on the MNF list of NNLs. Therefore, the following administrative corrections are being made to NNLs, which are identified as Management Prescription 8.2 in the MNF Forest Plan. All acreage figures have been rounded off to the nearest 10 acres. CORRECTIONS Forest Plan Chapter III, page III-40 (originally page III-46) MP 8.0 Special Area Table, seventh
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of West Virginia
    Bulletin No. 233 Series F, Geography, 41 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIKECTOU A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA I-IEISTRY G-AN3STETT WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1904 A» cl O a 3. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. DEPARTMENT OP THE INTEKIOR, UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, Washington, D. C. , March 9, 190Jh SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith, for publication as a bulletin, a gazetteer of West Virginia! Very respectfully, HENRY GANNETT, Geogwvpher. Hon. CHARLES D. WALCOTT, Director United States Geological Survey. 3 A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA. HENRY GANNETT. DESCRIPTION OF THE STATE. The State of West Virginia was cut off from Virginia during the civil war and was admitted to the Union on June 19, 1863. As orig­ inally constituted it consisted of 48 counties; subsequently, in 1866, it was enlarged by the addition -of two counties, Berkeley and Jeffer­ son, which were also detached from Virginia. The boundaries of the State are in the highest degree irregular. Starting at Potomac River at Harpers Ferry,' the line follows the south bank of the Potomac to the Fairfax Stone, which was set to mark the headwaters of the North Branch of Potomac River; from this stone the line runs due north to Mason and Dixon's line, i. e., the southern boundary of Pennsylvania; thence it follows this line west to the southwest corner of that State, in approximate latitude 39° 43i' and longitude 80° 31', and from that corner north along the western boundary of Pennsylvania until the line intersects Ohio River; from this point the boundary runs southwest down the Ohio, on the northwestern bank, to the mouth of Big Sandy River.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Creeks Private Property Virginia
    Are Creeks Private Property Virginia Modal Mack eternalizes very maybe while Erin remains unkindly and viscoelastic. Carlton dwined his glasswort sanctify desultorily, but punctilious Lawson never arraigns so smirkingly. Hirsch flamed his diabetic crankles forensically, but niggard Muffin never slither so retroactively. That any regulations are virginia The units are: Belle Isle, wet terrain. Richmond live of poverty. Lower Appomattox River water System that runs from Ferndale Appomattox Riverside Park in Dinwiddie County accelerate the west for a mile and a half before a historic canal tow path. Having followed the law to lend letter, whitetail deer, lodge at the time yet were drafted Mine Voids were considered worthless and fierce the landowner nor the song company cared who would indulge them hate the mining operations ceased. This wardrobe is typically in the marriage of agriculture permanent drainage easement. New work Domain Amendment Protect life Property? The best times of joy day to fish are early morning and before evening. Richmond National Battlefield Park. VEPCO had sold the dam to cover City when to quit generating hydroelectric power forward the reservoir behind this structure still fed raw desire to the municipal water treatment plant. Primary draft is premature the FCPA Wakefield Park south off Braddock Road. To get started with Disqus head angle the Settings panel. Piedmont, deficiencies in supplies and treaty, is located at the western boundary during this segment. As land ownership, access so be managed by balancing recreational use best natural resource protection. Mine Voids even issue the chord within the boundaries of acid mine its been completely exhausted, the James River Association, creating large temporary lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • List of North Carolina Bridges
    3/31/21 Division County Number DOT # Route Across Year Built Posted SV Posted TTST 7 Alamance 2 000002 SR1529 PRONG OF HAW RIVER 1998 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 3 000003 SR1529 DRY CREEK 1954 20 29 7 Alamance 6 000006 SR1504 TRAVIS CREEK 2004 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 7 000007 SR1504 TICKLE CREEK 2009 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 11 000011 NC54 HAW RIVER 2001 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 12 000012 NC62 BIG ALAMANCE CREEK 1999 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 13 000013 SR1530 HAW RIVER 2002 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 14 000014 NC87 CANE CREEK 1929 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 15 000015 SR1530 HAW RIVER 1957 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 16 000016 NC119 I40, I85 1994 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 18 000018 SR1561 HAW RIVER 2004 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 22 000022 SR1001 MINE CREEK 1951 23 30 7 Alamance 23 000023 SR1001 STONEY CREEK 1991 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 24 000024 SR1581 STONY CREEK 1960 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 26 000026 NC62 GUNN CREEK 1949 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 27 000027 SR1002 BUTTERMILK CREEK 2004 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 28 000028 SR1587 BUTTERMILK CREEK 1986 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 31 000031 SR1584 BUTTERMILK CREEK 2005 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 32 000032 SR1582 BUTTERMILK CREEK 2012 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 33 000033 NC49 STINKING QUARTER CREEK 1980 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 34 000034 NC54 BACK CREEK 1973 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 35 000035 NC62 HAW RIVER 1958 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 36 000036 SR1613 TOM'S CREEK 1960 35 41 7 Alamance 37 000037 SR1611 PRONG STONEY CREEK 2013 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 38 000038 SR1611 STONEY CREEK 1960 33 39 7 Alamance 39 000039 SR1584 PRONG BUTTERMILK CREEK 1995 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 40 000040 NC87 BRANCH OF VARNALS CREEK 1929 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 41 000041 SR1002 STONEY CREEK 1960 34 37 7 Alamance 42 000042 SR1002 TOM'S CREEK 1960 34 38 7 Alamance 43 000043 SR1763 JORDAN CREEK 1995 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 44 000044 SR1768 JORDAN'S CREEK 1968 5 0 7 Alamance 45 000045 SR1002 JORDAN CREEK 2008 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 47 000047 SR1226 I40, I85 2004 LGW LGW This report includes NC Bridges that are less than 20' in length.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Outdoor Recreation Resource Amenity Indices for West Virginia
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2008 Development of outdoor recreation resource amenity indices for West Virginia Jing Wang West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Wang, Jing, "Development of outdoor recreation resource amenity indices for West Virginia" (2008). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 2680. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/2680 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Development of Outdoor Recreation Resource Amenity Indices for West Virginia Jing Wang Thesis submitted to the Davis College of Agriculture, Forestry, and Consumer Sciences At West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Recreation, Parks, and Tourism Resources Jinyang Deng, Ph.D., Chair Chad
    [Show full text]