DOCSLIB.ORG

Colorado River Valley Field Office – Proposed RMP/Final EIS 6-1 Chapter 6, References 6

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Colorado River Valley Field Office – Proposed RMP/Final EIS 6-1 Chapter 6, References 6 CHAPTER 6 REFERENCES Air Resources Specialists. 2009. Garfield County 2008 Air Quality Monitoring Summary. Prepared for Garfield County Public Health Department. Rifle, Colorado. Andreason, J. K. 1973. Reproductive Life History of Catostomus ardens and Catostomus discobolus in the Weber River, Utah. MS Thesis, Department of Zoology, Brigham Young University. Provo, Utah. Andrews, R. and R. Righter. 1992. Colorado Birds. Denver Museum of Natural History. Denver, Colorado. Arizona State University. 2008a. Final Report of the Glenwood Springs and Kremmling Field Office Planning Area Visitor Study, March 2008. 2008b, Final Report of the Glenwood Springs and Kremmling Field Office Planning Area Visitor Study, March 2008. Armour, C.L. 1977. Effects of deteriorated range streams on trout. 7 p. USDI Bureau of Land Management, Idaho State Office, Boise, Idaho. Armstrong, Harley J. 1994. BLM Colorado Fossil Education Kits: Formations and Fossils of the Glenwood Springs Resource Area. Kits on file, BLM Colorado Field Offices. Armstrong, Harley J. and D. G. Wolny. 1989. Paleontological Resources in Northwest Colorado: A Regional Analysis. Museum of Western Colorado, report on file, Kremmling BLM Field Office. Kremmling, Colorado. Avian Power Line Interaction Committee. 2006. Suggested Practices for Raptor Protection on Power Lines: The State of the Art in 1996. Edison Electric Institute, Avian Power Line Interaction Committee, and the California Energy Commission. Washington, DC, and Sacramento, California. Avian Power Line Interaction Committee and USFWS (US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service). 2005. Avian Protection Plan (APP) Guidelines. April 2005. Washington, DC. February 2014 Colorado River Valley Field Office – Proposed RMP/Final EIS 6-1 Chapter 6, References 6. References Bailey, A. M. and R. J. Niedrach. 1965. Birds of Colorado. Volume 1. Denver Museum of Natural History, Denver, Colorado. 454 pp. Barrett, J.C., G.D. Grossman, and J. Rosenfeld. 1992. Turbidity- induced changes in reactive distance of rainbow trout. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 121:437-443. Baxter, G. T., and M. D. Stone. 1995. Fishes of Wyoming. Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Cheyenne, Wyoming. BBC Research and Consulting. 2004. The Economic Impacts of Hunting, Fishing, and Wildlife Watching. Colorado Division of Wildlife. Denver, Colorado. October 2004. 2008. Northwest Colorado Socioeconomic Analysis and Forecasts. Prepared for Associated Governments of Northwest Colorado. Rifle, Colorado. April 4, 2008. BEA (Bureau of Economic Analysis). 2007. Personal Income and Detailed Earnings by Industry. Internet website: www.bea.gov/regional/reis/CA05fn.cfm. Beck, J. L., and J. M. Peek. 2005. Diet Composition, Forage Selection, and Potential for Forage Competition Among Elk, Deer, and Livestock on Aspen-Sagebrush Summer Range. Rangeland Ecology and Management 58:135-147. Behnke, R. J. 1979. Monograph of the Native Trouts of the Genus Salmo of western North America. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Lakewood, Colorado. 1992. Native Trout of Western North America. American Fisheries Society Monograph 6. Bethesda Maryland. Behnke, R. J. and M. Zarn. 1976. Biology and Management of Threatened and Endangered Western Trout. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Colorado. General Technical Report RM-28. Bement, R. E., and D. W. Davis. Undated. How Much Feed Can This Range Produce? Soil Conservation Service. Craig, Colorado. Bernatowicz, J. 2004. Should Human Disturbance Be Regulated on Winter Range? Website: http://wdfw.wa.gov/wlm/game/hunter/gametrails/2004/human_limits.htm. Accessed on: 3-5- 2010. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Bestgen, K. R. 1990. Status Review of the Razorback Sucker, Xyrauchen texanus. Larval Fish Laboratory Report #44. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. 2000. Personal communication with Director of Colorado State University’s Larval Fish Lab, Fort Collins, Colorado. February 2014 Colorado River Valley Field Office – Proposed RMP/Final EIS 6-2 Chapter 6, References 6. References Bezzerides, N., and K. Bestgen. 2002. Status Review of Roundtail Chub Gila robusta, Flannelmouth Sucker Catostomus latipinnis, and Bluehead Sucker Catostomus discobolus. Colorado State University, Larval Fish Lab Contribution 118, Fort Collins, Colorado. Binns, N. A. 1977. Present Status of Indigenous Populations of Cutthroat Trout (Salmo clarki) in Southwest Wyoming. Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Fisheries Technical Bulletin 2. Cheyenne, Wyoming. BLM (US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management). 1984a. Final Resource Management Plan and Record of Decision. BLM, Glenwood Springs Field Office, Colorado. 1984b. Final Resource Management Plan and Record of Decision. BLM, Kremmling Field Office, Colorado. 1984c. Manual 8400 - Visual Resource Management. Internet website: www.blm.gov/nstc/VRM/ 8400.html. 1986a. Manual H-8410-1 - Visual Resource Inventory. BLM Manual-8410-1. US. Department of the Interior. 1986b. BLM Handbook H-8431-1, Visual Resource Contrast Rating. Internet website: http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en/prog/Recreation/recreation_national/RMS/2.html . 1988. Final Resource Management Plan’s Revised Record of Decision. BLM, Glenwood Springs Field Office, Colorado. 1991a. Colorado Oil and Gas Leasing and Development Final Environmental Impact Statement. BLM, Colorado State Office, Lakewood, Colorado. January 1991. 1991b. Riparian-Wetland Initiative for the 1990s, BLM/WO/GI-91/001 +4340. Washington, DC. September 1991. 1991c. Wilderness Study Report, Volume Four, Grand Junction District Study Areas. 1992a. Fish and Wildlife 2000: Rare Plants and Natural Plant Communities – A Strategy for the Future. 59 pp. 1992b. BLM Manual 1737. Riparian-Wetland Area Management. December 10, 1992. 1993a. Technical Reference BLM/SC/ST-93/003+1737. Riparian Area Management: Process for Assessing Proper Functioning Condition. Prepared by D. Prichard, H. Barrett, J. Cagney, R. Clark, J. Fogg, K. Gebhardt, Dr. P. Hansen, B. Mitchell, and D. Tippy for the BLM’s Service Center, Denver, Colorado, 1993. 1995. Interim Management Policy for Lands under Wilderness Review, H-8550-1. BLM, Portland, Oregon. July 5, 1995. February 2014 Colorado River Valley Field Office – Proposed RMP/Final EIS 6-3 Chapter 6, References 6. References . 1996. Rangeland Standards and Guidelines for Livestock Grazing. Internet website: www.co.blm.gov/standguide.htm . 1997a. Standards for Public Land Health and Guidelines for Livestock Grazing Management in Colorado. BLM, Colorado State Office, Lakewood, Colorado. February 3, 1997. 1997b. Decision Record and Finding of No Significant Impact and Environmental Assessment for Standards for Public Land Health and Guidelines for Livestock Grazing Management in Colorado. BLM, Colorado Field Offices, Colorado. January 1997. 1997c. Final Environmental Assessment for Castle Peak Travel Management Plan. BLM, Glenwood Springs Field Office, Colorado. 1997d. Final Resource Management Plan Amendment and Environmental Assessment for Castle Peak Travel Management Plan. Glenwood Springs Field Office, Colorado. 1998a. Technical Reference BLM/RS/ST/98/001+1737. Riparian Area Management: A User Guide to Assessing Proper Functioning Condition and the Supporting Science for Lotic Areas. Prepared by D. Prichard, J. Anderson, C. Correll, J. Fogg, K. Gebhardt, R. Krapf, S. Leonard, B. Mitchell, and J. Staats for the BLM’s National Applied Resource Science Center, Denver, Colorado, 1998. 1999a. Final Environmental Assessment for Red Hill Management Plan. CO-078-99-030 EA. November 10, 1999. BLM, Glenwood Springs Field Office, Colorado. 40 pp. 1999b. Glenwood Springs Resource Area, Oil and Gas Leasing and Development, Record of Decision and Resource Management Plan Amendment. BLM, Glenwood Springs Field Office, Colorado. March 1999. 1999c. Environmental Assessment Record for Bocco Mountain SRMA OHV and Recreation Management Implementation Plan. CO-078-99-052 EA. BLM, Glenwood Springs Field Office, Colorado. 28 pp plus map. 2000a. Red Hill Area Implementation Plan. BLM, Glenwood Springs Field Office, Colorado. 2000b. Final Resource Management Plan Amendment and Environmental Assessment for Land Acquisition Land Use Priorities. BLM, Kremmling Field Office, Colorado. 2000c. Recreation Guidelines to Meet Public Land Health Standards on Bureau of Land Management Managed Lands in Colorado. BLM, Colorado State Office, Colorado. 2001a. Oil Shale Withdrawal Revocation, RMP Amendments, and Decision Record. CO-GJFO-01- 81 EA. BLM, Glenwood Springs, Grand Junction, and White River Field Offices, Colorado. November 2001. 2001b. National Management Strategy for Motorized Off-Highway Vehicle Use on Public Lands. BLM, Washington, DC. January 2001. February 2014 Colorado River Valley Field Office – Proposed RMP/Final EIS 6-4 Chapter 6, References 6. References . 2001c. Biological Soil Crusts: Ecology and Management. Technical Reference 1730-2. BLM, Washington, D.C. 2001d. Wilderness Inventory and Study Procedures, Handbook H-6310-1. BLM, Washington, D.C. 2002a. Resource Management Plan Amendment, Final Environmental Assessment, and Decision Record for the GSFO Fire Management Plan. CO-140-2001-0051 EA. BLM, Glenwood Springs Field Office, Colorado. September 2002. 84 pp. 2002b. GSFO Fire Management Plan, Wildland Fire Management and Prescriptive Vegetation Treatment Guidance for the Upper Colorado River Interagency Fire Management (USFS White River National Forest, BLM Grand
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FS Region 2 Snowmobile Trespass Strategy
    Rocky Mountain Region Information and Education Strategy For The Prevention of Snowmobile Trespass In Wilderness Third Edition January 2004 - -1 Table of Contents Page I. Problem Statement 1 II. Current Situation 1 III. Current Direction 3 IV. Implementation and Responsibilities 3 V. Monitoring and Reporting 4 VI. Using the Appendices and Tool Kit 4 VII. Appendices A. Excerpts from the Wilderness Act of 1964 6 B. Selected References from the Code of Federal Regulations 7 C. Selected References from Forest Service Manual 2320 8 D. Patrol Ideas 11 E. Potential Cooperators/Contacts for Reaching Local Users 13 F. Potential Cooperators/Contacts for Reaching Non-local Users 15 G. In-house I&E Ideas 17 H. Suggested Actions for Dealing With Intentional Trespass 18 I. Tool and Techniques - Law Enforcement and the “Authority Of The Resource" 19 J. What Harm Is There in Operating My Snowmobile in Wilderness? 25 K. Why is Wilderness Closed to Motorized and Mechanical Travel? 26 L. State Registration Agencies, State Snowmobile Associations and Snowmobile Clubs 27 M. Annual Monitoring Report 35 VIII. Tool Kit 38 1 - -1 I. Problem Statement The Wilderness Act of 1964 first created Congressionally designated wilderness. The Act stated that "In order to assure that an increasing population, accompanied by expanding settlement and growing mechanization, does not occupy and modify all areas within the United States ... it is hereby declared to be the policy of Congress to secure for the American people of present and future generations the benefits of an enduring resource of wilderness". The Act defined wilderness as having outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and unconfined type of recreation.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitteilungen 29
    MITTEILUNGEN 29. Jahrgang / Heft 1-2019 / kostenlos „Leipziger Kletterschule“ 100 Jahre Ostbruch Brandis 7-Brüche-Wandertag Flyer zum Jubiläum (Beilage im Heft) Wild, Wilder, Wilderness Trekking in den Bergen Colorados Iran Skitour zum Damawand 1 DAV MITTEILUNGEN | AUS DER GESCHÄFTSSTELLE 2 Vorwort Winter ohne Leipzig Den Ein oder Anderen könnte es freuen, dass dieser Winter weite Teile Deutschlands und Ös- doch einige der spannendsten Geschichten bereit, terreich voll im Griff hatte und zum Schnee- die ihr in diesem Heft nacherleben könnt. Eine schuhwandern und Skitouren gehen eingeladen Skitour im Iran, eine Wintertour von Thomas aber hat. Wer jedoch nicht geplant hatte einmal in die auch eine Trekking-Reise in den eher wärmeren Alpen zu fahren, der blieb vom Schnee verschont. Gefilden von Colorado (Teil1) werden euch diese In Leipzig hatte man wie immer das Gefühl un- Ausgabe versüßen. Ebenso fiebere ich bereits den ter einer Glocke zu leben die den Schnee abfängt. ersten warmem Sonnenstrahlen und Tagen am Seit einigen Jahren erlebe ich den Winter hier Fels entgegen. Über Ostern geht es sicher wieder eher als verspäteten Herbst mit reichlich Regen, für ein paar Tage nach Tirol, um einige Projekte Tee und intensivem Hallentraining. Für jemanden vom letzten Jahr in der Ehnbachklamm anzuge- wie mich, der seine Kindheit im Südharz verbracht hen. Einer der schönsten Kletterspots die ich bis- hat, ist das schon etwas gewöhnungsbedürftig. her besuchen durfte. Um wenigstens einen Hauch von Wintergefühl Anlässlich des 150 Jubiläums des Deutschen Al- zu bekommen, muss ich hier schon in den Zug penvereines und auch der Sektion Leipzig, freue steigen. Da freue ich mich umso mehr von den ich mich in diesem Jahr zudem besonders auf die Menschen zu lesen, die sich trotz der hiesigen Jubiläumsfeier am 31.
    [Show full text]
  • COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail
    CONTINENTAL DIVIDE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL DAY & OVERNIGHT HIKES: COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail THE CENTENNIAL STATE The Colorado Rockies are the quintessential CDT experience! The CDT traverses 800 miles of these majestic and challenging peaks dotted with abandoned homesteads and ghost towns, and crosses the ancestral lands of the Ute, Eastern Shoshone, and Cheyenne peoples. The CDT winds through some of Colorado’s most incredible landscapes: the spectacular alpine tundra of the South San Juan, Weminuche, and La Garita Wildernesses where the CDT remains at or above 11,000 feet for nearly 70 miles; remnants of the late 1800’s ghost town of Hancock that served the Alpine Tunnel; the awe-inspiring Collegiate Peaks near Leadville, the highest incorporated city in America; geologic oddities like The Window, Knife Edge, and Devil’s Thumb; the towering 14,270 foot Grays Peak – the highest point on the CDT; Rocky Mountain National Park with its rugged snow-capped skyline; the remote Never Summer Wilderness; and the broad valleys and numerous glacial lakes and cirques of the Mount Zirkel Wilderness. You might also encounter moose, mountain goats, bighorn sheep, marmots, and pika on the CDT in Colorado. In this guide, you’ll find Colorado’s best day and overnight hikes on the CDT, organized south to north. ELEVATION: The average elevation of the CDT in Colorado is 10,978 ft, and all of the hikes listed in this guide begin at elevations above 8,000 ft. Remember to bring plenty of water, sun protection, and extra food, and know that a hike at elevation will likely be more challenging than the same distance hike at sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C - Roadless Areas
    Appendix C - Roadless Areas Purpose The purpose of this appendix is to describe roadless areas and the analysis factors used in evaluating individual roadless areas on the Routt National Forest. It includes a description of the physical and biological features, primitive recreation and education opportunities, resources, and present management situation for each area. Background Roadless Area Review and Evaluation In 1970, the Forest Service studied all administratively designated primitive areas and inventoried and reviewed all roadless areas in the National Forest System greater than 5,000 acres. This study was known as the Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE). RARE was halted in 1972 due to legal challenge. RARE identified 711,043 acres of roadless area on the Routt National Forest. In 1977, the Forest Service began another nation-wide Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE II) to identify roadless and undeveloped areas within the National Forest System that were suitable for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System. Twenty nine areas, totalling 566,756 acres, were inventoried on the Routt National Forest (including the Middle Park Ranger District of the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest). As a result of RARE II, four areas on the forest - Williams Fork, St. Louis Peak, Service Creek, and Davis Peak - were administratively designated as Further Planning Areas (FPA). This further planning area designation meant that more information was needed before the Forest Service would recommend any of these areas to Congress for wilderness designation. In January 1979, the Forest Service issued nationally a Final Environmental Impact Statement documenting a review of 62 million acres of roadless and undeveloped areas within the 191-million-acre National Forest System.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State
    Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,770 83 25,853 Alabama Totals 42,218 83 42,301 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness 74,876 520 75,396 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,118 0 19,118 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,917 7 39,924 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 979,079 21,741 1,000,820 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 654 654 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,183 15 60,198 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,814 0 4,814 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,144,010 235 2,144,245 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 46,758 0 46,758 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,083 41 23,124 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 348,626 63 348,689 South Baranof Wilderness Tongass National Forest 315,833 0 315,833 South Etolin Wilderness Tongass National Forest 82,593 834 83,427 Refresh Date: 10/14/2017
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Insect and Disease Conditions in the Rocky Mountain Region 1997-1999
    Forest Insect and Disease Conditions in the Rocky Mountain Region 1997-1999 United States Renewable Rocky Department of Resources Mountain Agriculture Forest Health Region Management 2 FOREST INSECT AND DISEASE CONDITIONS IN THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION 1997-1999 by The Forest Health Management Staff Edited by Jeri Lyn Harris, Michelle Frank, and Susan Johnson December 2001 USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region Renewable Resources, Forest Health Management P.O. Box 25127 Lakewood, Colorado 80225-5127 Cover: Aerial photograph taken by Robert D. Averill on October 29, 1997, just days after a blowdown event occurred on the Routt National Forest. The picture was taken looking east toward a blowdown area that straddles both the Mt. Zirkel Wilderness and the Routt National Forest. “The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternate means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity employer.” Maps in this product are reproduced from geospatial information prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. GIS data and product accuracy may vary.
    [Show full text]
  • SNOWY MOUNTAIN Clark, Colorado Ranch SNOWY MOUNTAIN RANCH
    61625 ROUTT COUNTRY ROAD 62 SNOWY MOUNTAIN clark, colorado ranch SNOWY MOUNTAIN RANCH one of northwest colorado’s most spectacular properties. SNOWY MOUNTAIN RANCH Epic Log Home on 210 Extraordinary Acres In the Elk River Valley just north of Steamboat Springs sits a one-of-a-kind luxury home overlooking the recreational paradise of Steamboat Lake. This epic log homes sits on 210 extraordinary acres with ponds, a creek, trails, and views. As you enter the gated property you wind through towering aspen and pine trees with majestic mountains in the distance. Wide open fields lead to uncompromised views of Steamboat Lake, abundant wildlife and impeccable landscaping with a giant yard area. This property offers a majestic main residence of more than 14,000 sq ft plus a two bedroom guest house, and a massive garage with three enclosed bays, full caretaker quarters and gym. 6 BEDROOMS 6 BATHS, 3 H A L F B AT H 4+ CAR GARAGE / BARN FURNISHED subject to exclusions 210 ACRES THE PROPERTY 1 Main Home 10,900+ sf 6 bedrooms, 6 full baths and 3 half baths. Masterfully crafted of quality large-diameter log & stone construction with the highest levels of finishes & furnishings. 2 Guest House 1,060 sf 2 bedroom 1 bath. Kitchen, living room vaulted ceilings and fireplace with the same fine-finishes as the main home. 1 3 Workshop/Barn with Living Quarters + Gym 2,220 sf living space 3,884 sf garage/shop 3 large drive-through bays, an exercise area, and apartment with kitchen living area, 2 bedrooms and bath, and abundant storage.
    [Show full text]
  • Intrusive Rocks Northeast of Steamboat Springs, Park Range, Colorado
    Intrusive Rocks Northeast of Steamboat Springs, Park Range, Colorado GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1041 Intrusive Rocks Northeast of Steamboat Springs, Park Range, Colorado By GEORGE L. SNYDER with a section on GEOGHRONOLOGY By CARL E. HEDGE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1041 Delineation of intrusive rock types in a previously unstudied area of Colorado and comparison with related rocks elsewhere in Colorado and Wyoming UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1978 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY H. William Menard, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Snyder, George Leonard, 1927- Intrusive rocks northeast of Steamboat Springs, Park Range, Colorado. (Geological Survey Professional Paper 1041) Bibliography: p. 39 Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.16:1041 1. Intrusions (Geology) Colorado Steamboat Springs region. 2. Geology, Stratigraphic Pre-Cambrian. 3. Geology, Stratigraphic Tertiary. 4. Geology Colorado Steamboat Springs region. 5. Intrusions (Geology)-The West- I. Hedge, Carl E. II. Title. III. Series: United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1041. QE611.S69 551.8*8 77-608250 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-03131-1 CONTENTS Page P^ Abstract ................................................ 1 Geochronology by C. E. Hedge ............................ 17 Introduction and acknowledgments ....................... 2 Petrography and chemistry of intrusive
    [Show full text]
  • Steamboat Springs: Gateway to One of the World's Best Thru Hikes
    Steamboat Springs: Gateway to one of the world’s best thru hikes This welcoming western town is the newest Continental Divide Trail Gateway Community and the jumping off point for stunning wilderness areas; learn how you can support the wild places you love Steamboat Springs exudes a genuine, hospitable western spirit so palpable it’s no wonder this mountain destination was recently designated a Continental Divide Trail (CDT) Gateway Community. As one of just five gateway communities in Colorado, Steamboat Springs is committed to providing an inviting environment for hikers trekking the 3,100-mile CDT Scenic Trail, which runs between Mexico and Canada. Designated by Congress in 1978, the CDT is the highest, most challenging and most remote of the 11 National Scenic Trails. In short, it is a treasured national resource, one that is worth protecting and celebrating. CDT Gateway Communities are recognized for their part in promoting awareness and stewardship of the trail and creating a welcoming environment for people traveling along it. To that end, the Steamboat Springs Chamber is handing out welcome bags to thru-hikers passing through town on the CDT. The Chamber banded together with several local trail advocacy groups, the U.S. Forest Service and locally-based brands Big Agnes and Point6 to champion the designation and provide the goodie bag, which includes a pair of Point6 socks, Big Agnes swag, a free pint of beer at Mountain Tap, discounted entry to Old Town Hot Springs and more. CDT welcome bags are available at the Steamboat Springs Visitor Center from 8 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Zirkel Herd
    Approved by Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission December 2012 BIGHORN SHEEP MANAGEMENT PLAN DATA ANALYSIS UNIT RBS-37 Mount Zirkel Herd GAME MANAGEMENT UNIT S73 Prepared for: Colorado Parks and Wildlife By: Jeffrey A. Yost Terrestrial Wildlife Biologist Northwest Region Date: March 26, 2012 Photo Credit: Carlye Keller i DAU RBS-37 (Mount Zirkel Bighorn Sheep) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GMUs: S73 Land Ownership: 26% Private, 62% USFS, 2% State, 10% BLM Posthunt Population: Previous Objective None, 2011 Estimate, 50-75, Preferred Objective 150-200 Posthunt Sex Ratio: Previous Objective None, 2011 Observed 125, Preferred Object 60-80 Figure 1: RBS-37 bighorn posthunt population estimate and observed from 2005 to 2011. Figure 2: Observed posthunt sex ratios for RBS-37 from 2005 to 2011. Figure 3: RBS-37 ram and ewe removals via harvest from biological year 2005 to 2011. 2 Background Information The Mount Zirkel Bighorn Sheep herd (Rocky Mountain Bighorn Sheep Data Analysis Unit (DAU) RBS-37 is one of the newest herds in Colorado. In January of 2005 forty Rocky Mountain bighorns were released into historical sheep habitat of the Park Range 20 miles west of Walden, Colorado. Since that time the herd has grown substantially providing wildlife viewing, photography, and recently hunting opportunities. DAU RBS-37 consists of one Game Management Unit (GMU) S73. It encompasses 487 square miles (1,353 square kilometers) in Jackson and Routt Counties. No municipalities exist within the DAU boundaries. However, nearby towns include Cowdrey, Walden, and Steamboat Springs. The majority of actual useable sheep habitat is in the western half of the DAU and is comprised of National Forest Service land with most of that lying within the Mount Zirkel Wilderness.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain Region 2 – Historical Geography, Names, Boundaries
    NAMES, BOUNDARIES, AND MAPS: A RESOURCE FOR THE HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHY OF THE NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM OF THE UNITED STATES THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION (Region Two) By Peter L. Stark Brief excerpts of copyright material found herein may, under certain circumstances, be quoted verbatim for purposes such as criticism, news reporting, education, and research, without the need for permission from or payment to the copyright holder under 17 U.S.C § 107 of the United States copyright law. Copyright holder does ask that you reference the title of the essay and my name as the author in the event others may need to reach me for clarifi- cation, with questions, or to use more extensive portions of my reference work. Also, please contact me if you find any errors or have a map that has not been included in the cartobibliography ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In the process of compiling this work, I have met many dedicated cartographers, Forest Service staff, academic and public librarians, archivists, and entrepreneurs. I first would like to acknowledge the gracious assistance of Bob Malcolm Super- visory Cartographer of Region 2 in Golden, Colorado who opened up the Region’s archive of maps and atlases to me in November of 2005. Also, I am indebted to long-time map librarians Christopher Thiry, Janet Collins, Donna Koepp, and Stanley Stevens for their early encouragement and consistent support of this project. In the fall of 2013, I was awarded a fellowship by The Pinchot Institute for Conservation and the Grey Towers National Historic Site. The Scholar in Resi- dence program of the Grey Towers Heritage Association allowed me time to write and edit my research on the mapping of the National Forest System in an office in Gifford Pinchot’s ancestral home.
    [Show full text]
  • Ways of Life Continuing Ways of Life
    BOUNDLESS LANDSCAPES & S P I R I T E D P E O P L E NORTHWEST COLORADO CULTURAL HERITAGE ways of life The remoteness of northwest Colorado has always attracted self-determined and resilient explorers. There is a legacy of connection here—between spirited people and boundless landscapes. SURVEYORS MINERS RANCHERS LOGGERS Photo courtesy of Library of Congress Photo courtesy of Tracks and Trails Museum Photo courtesy of Tread of Pioneers Museum Photo courtesy of U.S. Forest Service Vast and diverse, the region offered rich Fortieth Parallel The Miner’s Life Time Honored Life Gould, Colorado yet rugged ways of life. Here, people created John Wesley Powell: Argo Mine & Haybro Mine: Working the Land: Bockman Lumber Camp: strong traditions and cultures that were In 1869 the Powell Expedition ran the Green Mining booms—coal ore, gold, and silver— Abundant grasses and water lured early cattle One hundred men and their families once lived sustained by the land. River and camped at its convergence with the brought men and their families to the region to and sheep men to the region. Cowboys trailed in Colorado’s largest logging camp. Tie hacks Yampa River (Echo Park). Two years later, at the labor in the open cut and underground mines. large herds into the mountains during summer felled trees, cut them to length, and fattened top of Harpers Corner, the expedition penned, After the bust times, many stayed to ranch and back to the valleys before winter snowfall. four sides with a broadax to make railroad ties. “We could look over Echo Wall [Steamboat Rock] and build northwest Colorado communities.
    [Show full text]