Tanks: 100 Years of Evolution Ebook, Epub
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
TANKS: 100 YEARS OF EVOLUTION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Richard Ogorkiewicz | 376 pages | 24 Feb 2015 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9781472806703 | English | Oxford, United Kingdom Tanks: 100 Years of Evolution PDF Book Because of production difficulties, only test vehicles were completed before the War ended. Frank Donati rated it really liked it Nov 02, Ayer Publishing. By , the same armies had evolved armoured divisions that were a balance of different arms and services, each of which had to be as mobile and almost as protected as the tanks they accompanied. Over the years, many nations cut back the number of their tanks or replaced most of them with lightweight armoured fighting vehicles with only minimal armour protection. Proponents of mechanization and motorization pointed to advances in the motor vehicle industry and to the corresponding decrease in the use of horses and mules. In post-revolution Russia, the Vezdekhod was portrayed in propaganda as the first tank. During the period between the world wars, the weights of the classifications varied generally within these extremes. Boom, boom View Product. The continued progress in the design of armour, armament, engines, and vehicles was gradually swinging the trend toward more mechanization, and the military value of the horse declined. Tank designs of World War II were based upon many complex considerations, but the principal factors were those thought to be best supported by combat experience. The first generation included such prewar vehicles as the Panzerkampfwagen or Panzer I and II, which were similar to Soviet and British light tanks. The B1 bis, developed by Estienne in the early s, was still one of the most powerful tank designs in the world fifteen years later. On 12 December, unaware of the Schneider experiments, Estienne presented to the High Command a plan to form an armoured force, equipped with tracked vehicles. Not until 20 November , at Cambrai , did the British Tank Corps get the conditions it needed for success. Walter Christie to improve the silhouette, suspension, power, and weapons of tanks. As the French Army was moving forward in the area of mechanization, doctrinal strife began to develop. Numerous concepts of armoured all-terrain vehicles had been imagined for a long time. Zaloga and James Grandsen, Steven J. Though initially crude and unreliable, tanks eventually became a mainstay of ground armies. Armour evolved to keep pace with improvements in weaponry — the rise of composite armour is of particular note — and guns grew more powerful. If these kinds of systems evolve further and are integrated in contemporary tank and armoured vehicle fleets, the armour-antitank equation will change completely; therefore, 21st century tanks would experience a total revival in terms of operational capabilities. For instance, several light tank models were rejected because they exceeded the 5- ton cargo capacity of the Transportation Corps trucks, and several medium tank designs were rejected because they exceeded the ton bridge weight limit set by the engineers. Both of these were rejected by their respective governmental administrations. Readers also enjoyed. By the armistice of 11 November , the AEF was critically short of tanks, as no American-made ones were completed in time for use in combat. The Panzer II did have a mm cannon, but little armour protection. In the spring of , maneuvers in Georgia and Louisiana, where Patton was an umpire, showed how far U. Lesley J. Keep You Close. Their looming profile and bristling armaments make them the most easily identifiable piece of military hardware. The Committee was happy to perpetuate this misconception since it might also mislead the Germans. Experiments failed in tests made in July Herr maintained that horse cavalry had "stood the acid test of war", whereas the motor elements advocated by some to replace it had not. Both advocates and opponents of mechanization often used the term "tank" loosely to mean not only an armored, tracked, turreted, gun- carrying fighting vehicle, but also any form of armored vehicle or mechanized unit. Tanks: 100 Years of Evolution Writer There has been no proven alternative, and tanks have had a relatively good track record in recent conflicts. Although his designs did not meet US Army specifications, other countries used his chassis patents. From an internationally acclaimed expert in the field comes a detailed, analytical and comprehensive account of the worldwide evolution of tanks, from their inception a century ago to the present day. Forrest Todd rated it liked it Dec 27, Manchester: Manchester University Press. Aspects of gun technology changed significantly as well, with advances in shell design and effectiveness. Panzers and their Second World War Opponents. There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Parallel to the British development, France designed its own tanks. George F. After completion on 29 January very successful trials were made, and an order was placed by the War Office for units to be used on the Western front in France, [25] : [26] : on 12 February , [7] : and a second order for 50 additional units was placed in April India and Pakistan have upgraded old tanks and bought new Ts and Ts from the former Soviet states. Guderian's service with radiotelegraphs in support of cavalry units led him to insist on a radio in every armoured vehicle. Army General Adna R. Preview — Tanks by Richard Ogorkiewicz. He was the first officer so assigned. COVID can cause male infertility by harming the testicular cells which produce sperms thereby making it difficult to make the female pregnant, says a Though initially crude and unreliable, tanks eventually became a mainstay of ground armies. You know the saying: There's no time like the present Men, Ideas, and Tanks. With the advent of trench warfare in World War I , the Allied French and British developments of the tank were largely parallel and coincided in time. Lesley J. The German response to the Cambrai assault was to develop its own armoured program. These two vehicles made up the bulk of panzer units until Most importantly, Holt tractors were readily available in quantity. Published February 24th by Osprey Publishing first published February 20th Even more serious than the shortage of tanks was industry's lack of experience in tank manufacture and limited production facilities. Few recognised during World War I that the means for returning mobility and shock action to combat was already present in a device destined to revolutionise warfare on the ground and in the air. The enhanced capabilities that tanks consequently acquired enabled them to become the core of combined- arms, mechanized formations. Do your However, the appearance of large numbers of the new generation T and KV-1 Soviet tanks, that were unknown to Germans until , compelled them to join a race for superior armour and gun power. May 13, Justin rated it liked it. On the other hand, the Ordnance Department, while recognizing the usefulness of the Christie, was of the opinion that it was mechanically unreliable and that such dual-purpose equipment generally violated good engineering practice. The Invention of the Tank. Watkins, III rated it it was amazing Jan 10, Cromwell vs Jagdpanzer IV: Normandy For World War II, increased weights resulted in the light tank being over 20 tons, the medium over 30, and the heavy, developed toward the end of the war, over 60 tons. The design envisioned many innovations that became standard features of a modern battle tank — protection of the vehicle was well-thought out, the gun included automatic loading mechanism, pneumatic suspension allowed adjusting of clearance, some critical systems were duplicated, transportation by railroad was possible by a locomotive or with adapter wheels. In the Renault FT light tank was the first tank in history with a "modern" configuration: a revolving turret on top and an engine compartment at the rear; it would be the most numerous tank of the war. Even if their already hard-pressed industry could have produced them in quantity, fuel was in very short supply. Nonetheless, their work was sufficiently impressive to imbue at least a few military leaders with the idea that the use of tanks in mass was the most likely principal role of armour in the future. Austro-Hungarian Battleships Editor-in-Chief: Dr. This arrangement gave them the maximum of adaptability to the contours of the ground. Strangely, the book then has two chapters to wrap up tank development by other countries. London: Arms and Armour Press. The naval background of the tank's development also explains such nautical tank terms as hatch, hull, bow, and ports. The envelopment phase was neglected. The alternative to constant changes in tank design was to standardize a few basic designs and mass-produce them even though technology had advanced to new improvements. Dwyer, Gray E. Tanks: 100 Years of Evolution Reviews Cavalry was given the task of developing combat vehicles that would "enhance its power in roles of reconnaissance, counterreconnaissance, flank action, pursuit, and similar operations. The Committee was happy to perpetuate this misconception since it might also mislead the Germans. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Retrieved 27 February Though not a book for the casual reader due to its wealth of technical detail, it gives an expansive look not only at tanks, but the transforming paradigms of war-fighting, which changed from soldiers walking or riding to find and engage the enemy to long-ranging, combined-arms operations. Then tank development in Asia is covered in a single chapter, from WWI to the present. They were used on about six occasions from March The Act's stipulation that "hereafter all tank units shall form a part of the Infantry" left little doubt as to the tank role for the immediate future.