DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1906.05763V3 [Cond-Mat.Stat-Mech] 29 Jan 2020 School of Advanced Studies Gran Sasso Science Istitute Ph.D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1906.05763V3 [Cond-Mat.Stat-Mech] 29 Jan 2020 School of Advanced Studies Gran Sasso Science Istitute Ph.D Gran Sasso Science Institute PHD PROGRAMME IN MATHEMATICS IN NATURAL, SOCIAL AND LIFE SCIENCES Cycle XXIX - Academic year 2016/2017-L’Aquila Microscopic and macroscopic perspectives on stationary nonequilibrium states PHD CANDIDATE Leonardo De Carlo ADVISOR Prof. Davide Gabrielli Universita` degli studi dell’Aquila arXiv:1906.05763v3 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 29 Jan 2020 School of Advanced studies Gran Sasso Science Istitute Ph.D. degree in Mathematics of Natural, Social and Life Sciences Microscopic and macroscopic perspectives on stationary nonequilibrium states Candidate: Leonardo De Carlo Thesis advisor: Davide Gabrielli Academic year 2016-2017 Thesis Jury Members Cedric Bernardin ( Universit de Nice Sophia-Antipolis) Anna De Masi (Universit degli studi dell'Aquila) Cristian Giardin (Universit degli studi di Modena e Reggio Emila) Mauro Piccioni (Universit degli studi di Roma, "La Sapienza") Errico Presutti (GSSI, L'Aquila) Thesis Referees Cedric Bernardin ( Universit de Nice Sophia-Antipolis) Cristian Giardin (Universit degli studi di Modena e Reggio Emila) To my grandparents for all the time we spent together and what they gave me since before the very beginning. Contents Introduction: structure of the thesis 5 Acknowledgement 5 Part 1. Microscopic theory 7 Why a microscopic theory? 8 Microscopic Results: overview 9 Structure of the part 1 11 Chapter 1. Stochastic interacting systems 12 1.1. Continuous time Markov chain 12 1.1.1. Driven interacting systems 16 1.2. Reversibility and invariant measure 17 1.2.1. Transition Graph and Kolmogorov criterion 18 1.3. Particles models 19 1.3.1. Exclusion process 19 1.3.2. The 2-SEP 20 1.3.3. Glauber dynamics 20 1.3.4. Zero range model 21 1.3.5. Weakly asymmetric particles models 21 1.3.6. Instantaneous particle current 21 1.4. Energies-masses models 23 1.4.1. KMP model 23 1.4.2. Dual KMP model 24 1.4.3. Gaussian model 25 1.4.4. Weakly asymmetric energies-masses models 25 1.4.5. Stationarity 26 1.4.6. Instantaneous energy-mass current 27 1.5. Asymmetric energies-masses models 29 1.5.1. Totally asymmetric KMP model version 1 29 1.5.2. Totally asymmetric KMP version 2 30 1 Chapter 2. Discrete calculus in IPS 34 2.1. Discrete exterior calculus on cubic mesh 35 2.1.1. Primal cubic complex and dual cell complex 35 2.1.2. Discrete differential forms and exterior derivative 39 2.1.3. Hodge star and codifferential 41 2.1.4. Hodge decomposition 42 2.2. Discrete operators on the discrete torus 43 2.2.1. Notation 43 2.2.2. d : Ω0 ! Ω1 44 2.2.3. d : Ω1 ! Ω2 45 2.2.4. d : Ω2 ! Ω3 46 2.2.5. δ : Ω3 ! Ω2 46 2.2.6. δ : Ω2 ! Ω1 47 2.2.7. δ : Ω1 ! Ω0 47 2.3. Functional Hodge decomposition 48 2.3.1. One dimensional case 51 2.3.2. One dimensional interacting particles systems: examples 53 2.3.3. Two dimensional case 54 2.3.4. Two dimensional interacting particles systems: examples 58 2.3.5. Three dimensional case 58 Chapter 3. Gibbsian Stationary Nonequilibrium States 60 3.1. Graphs 60 3.2. Invariant measures and divergence free flows 61 3.2.1. Markov chains: transition graph and stationarity 62 3.2.2. Divergence free flow 62 3.3. Cyclic decomposition: applications 65 3.3.1. Metropolis algorithm 65 3.3.2. Random walks 65 3.3.3. Two dimensional Exclusion process 66 3.3.4. One dimensional Exclusion process 69 3.3.5. Reversible and gradient models in one dimension 72 3.3.6. Glauber dynamics 72 3.3.7. The general structure 73 3.3.8. Examples with global cycles 74 3.4. Stationarity and orthogonality 75 3.4.1. One-dimensional Exclusion process 75 3.4.2. One-dimensional Glauber dynamics 77 3.4.3. Two dimensional exclusion process 78 3.4.4. Two dimensional Glauber dynamics 80 Part 2. Macroscopic theory 83 2 Why a macroscopic theory? 84 Macroscopic results: overview 87 Structure of the part 2 89 Chapter 4. Hydrodynamic scaling limits 91 4.1. Scaling limits 91 4.2. Transport coefficients 94 4.3. Scaling limit of an exclusion process with vorticity 97 Chapter 5. Large deviations theory in IPS 99 5.1. A Large Deviation Principle 100 5.2. Steps in a large deviation proof: a scheme 101 5.2.1. Upper bound d) 102 5.2.2. Lower Bound e) 103 5.3. Dynamical large deviations 104 5.4. Stationary large deviations theory 106 5.4.1. Freidlin-Wentzell theory 106 5.4.2. A mechanical point of view 107 5.4.3. Macroscopic fluctuation theory 108 5.4.4. Infinite dimensional Hamilton-Jacobi equation 109 Chapter 6. Totally asymmetric limit for models of heat condutcion 111 6.1. Stationary solutions and currents 111 6.2. Quasi-potential for weakly asymmetric models 113 6.2.1. The reversible case 113 6.2.2. Solution of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation 114 6.3. Optimization 117 6.3.1. Case E = E∗ 117 6.3.2. Case E < E∗ 117 6.3.3. Case E > E∗ 119 6.4. The adjoint hydrodynamics 120 6.5. Totally asymmetric limit: E ! −∞ 122 6.6. Totally asymmetric limit: E ! +1 124 Chapter 7. Perspectives 128 7.1. Perspectives: part 1 128 7.1.1. Invariant stationary states under perturbations far away from equilibrium 129 7.2. Perspectives: part 2 130 Appendices 133 Chapter A. Complements to part 1 133 Chapter B. Complements to part 2 136 3 Bibliography 143 4 Introduction: structure of the thesis The main subject of the thesis is the study of stationary nonequilibrium states trough the use of microscopic stochastic models that encode the physical interaction in the rules of Markovian dynamics for particles configurations. These models are known as interacting particles systems and are simple enough to be treated analytically but also complex enough to capture essential physical behaviours. The thesis is organized in two parts. The part 1 is devoted to the microscopic theory of the stationary states. We characterize these states developing some gen- eral structures that have an interest in themselves. The part 2 studies the problem macroscopically. In particular we consider the large deviations asymptotic behavior for a class of solvable one dimensional models of heat conduction. Both part 1 and 2 begin with an introduction of motivational character followed by an overview of the relevant results and a summary explaining the organization. Even tough the two parts are strictly connected they can be read independently after chapter 1. The material is presented in such a way to be self-consistent as much as possible. The result of part 1 can be found in [DG17a] while that ones of part 2 in [DG17b]. Acknowledgement. First of all I thanks my advisor Davide Gabrielli to have led me with great attention during my research and for its careful reading of the manuscript. I acknowledge the Gran Sasso Science Istitute (GSSI) and the coordi- nators A. DeSimone, P. Marcati and E. Presutti for the opportunity to be involved in this research project. I especially thanks E. Presutti for having listened to me on many occasions. 5 Part 1 Microscopic theory Why a microscopic theory? Idealization of the microscopical physics of the matter by simple models had a fundamental role to understand the macroscopic phenomenology of the equilibrium states [Ma93, KTH91]. This efficacy of ideal models is due to the fact that to a reasonable extent the macroscopic behaviour is independent of the microscopic details, namely different systems exhibit qualitatively the same phenomenology at large scales. The same pictures is expected for nonequilibrium states, in these con- text using deterministic models is beyond the reach of the nowdays mathematics. Therefore, to study nonequilibrium states, it is common to assume a random motion at small scale. Even if at microscopical level particles move along Newton's equa- tion, this assumption is physically reasonable, indeed their motion is pretty chaotic in a random fashion without exhibiting some aim or particular coordination and the real reason of why we observe particles forming macroscopic pattern like determin- istic field (i.e. density) equations (PDEs) is that locally there are some constraints imposed to their dynamics like local conservation of mass, momentum and energy. These constraints are not immediately visible on microscopic scale but manifest themselves on the large scale where a deterministic motion appears for macroscopic observables like density, temperature, charge, etc. This is also the reason of why to a reasonable extent macroscopic behaviour is independent of the microscopic details. Since with stochastic models it is still possible to impose local conservation laws for the mass, energy, etc. that are exchanged by the microscopical dynamics this approach allows to prove rigorous autonomous macroscopic dynamics [KL99]. So studying different stochastic microscopical dynamics it is an important tool to comprehend which are the microscopical detail that are important to see different macroscopical behaviour. Here we are dealing both with models with discrete vari- ables and models with continuous variables, we are calling the first ones interacting particles systems and the second ones interacting energies-masses systems. The dynamics in these models are Markovian. To get a satisfactory understanding of the nonequilibrium stationary states it is necessary to be able to describe the measures characterizing these states, that is the equivalent of the Gibbs measures in equilibrium which lead to the thermodynamics ensembles. Their construction starts from the understanding of the long time be- haviour of the microscopic dynamics and they provide the bridge to pass from the microscopic to the macroscopic description of the system.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Combinatorial Laplacian and Rank Aggregation
    Combinatorial Laplacian and Rank Aggregation Combinatorial Laplacian and Rank Aggregation Yuan Yao Stanford University ICIAM, Z¨urich,July 16–20, 2007 Joint work with Lek-Heng Lim Combinatorial Laplacian and Rank Aggregation Outline 1 Two Motivating Examples 2 Reflections on Ranking Ordinal vs. Cardinal Global, Local, vs. Pairwise 3 Discrete Exterior Calculus and Combinatorial Laplacian Discrete Exterior Calculus Combinatorial Laplacian Operator 4 Hodge Theory Cyclicity of Pairwise Rankings Consistency of Pairwise Rankings 5 Conclusions and Future Work Combinatorial Laplacian and Rank Aggregation Two Motivating Examples Example I: Customer-Product Rating Example (Customer-Product Rating) m×n m-by-n customer-product rating matrix X ∈ R X typically contains lots of missing values (say ≥ 90%). The first-order statistics, mean score for each product, might suffer from most customers just rate a very small portion of the products different products might have different raters, whence mean scores involve noise due to arbitrary individual rating scales Combinatorial Laplacian and Rank Aggregation Two Motivating Examples From 1st Order to 2nd Order: Pairwise Rankings The arithmetic mean of score difference between product i and j over all customers who have rated both of them, P k (Xkj − Xki ) gij = , #{k : Xki , Xkj exist} is translation invariant. If all the scores are positive, the geometric mean of score ratio over all customers who have rated both i and j, !1/#{k:Xki ,Xkj exist} Y Xkj gij = , Xki k is scale invariant. Combinatorial Laplacian and Rank Aggregation Two Motivating Examples More invariant Define the pairwise ranking gij as the probability that product j is preferred to i in excess of a purely random choice, 1 g = Pr{k : X > X } − .
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Ranking and Combinatorial Hodge Theory
    STATISTICAL RANKING AND COMBINATORIAL HODGE THEORY XIAOYE JIANG, LEK-HENG LIM, YUAN YAO, AND YINYU YE Abstract. We propose a number of techniques for obtaining a global ranking from data that may be incomplete and imbalanced | characteristics that are almost universal to modern datasets coming from e-commerce and internet applications. We are primarily interested in cardinal data based on scores or ratings though our methods also give specific insights on ordinal data. From raw ranking data, we construct pairwise rankings, represented as edge flows on an appropriate graph. Our statistical ranking method exploits the graph Helmholtzian, which is the graph theoretic analogue of the Helmholtz operator or vector Laplacian, in much the same way the graph Laplacian is an ana- logue of the Laplace operator or scalar Laplacian. We shall study the graph Helmholtzian using combinatorial Hodge theory, which provides a way to un- ravel ranking information from edge flows. In particular, we show that every edge flow representing pairwise ranking can be resolved into two orthogonal components, a gradient flow that represents the l2-optimal global ranking and a divergence-free flow (cyclic) that measures the validity of the global ranking obtained | if this is large, then it indicates that the data does not have a good global ranking. This divergence-free flow can be further decomposed or- thogonally into a curl flow (locally cyclic) and a harmonic flow (locally acyclic but globally cyclic); these provides information on whether inconsistency in the ranking data arises locally or globally. When applied to statistical ranking problems, Hodge decomposition sheds light on whether a given dataset may be globally ranked in a meaningful way or if the data is inherently inconsistent and thus could not have any reasonable global ranking; in the latter case it provides information on the nature of the inconsistencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Space-Time Finite-Element Exterior Calculus and Variational Discretizations of Gauge Field Theories
    21st International Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems July 7-11, 2014. Groningen, The Netherlands Space-Time Finite-Element Exterior Calculus and Variational Discretizations of Gauge Field Theories Joe Salamon1, John Moody2, and Melvin Leok3 Abstract— Many gauge field theories can be described using a the space-time covariant (or multi-Dirac) perspective can be multisymplectic Lagrangian formulation, where the Lagrangian found in [1]. density involves space-time differential forms. While there has An example of a gauge symmetry arises in Maxwell’s been much work on finite-element exterior calculus for spatial and tensor product space-time domains, there has been less equations of electromagnetism, which can be expressed in done from the perspective of space-time simplicial complexes. terms of the scalar potential φ, the vector potential A, the One critical aspect is that the Hodge star is now taken with electric field E, and the magnetic field B. respect to a pseudo-Riemannian metric, and this is most natu- @A @ rally expressed in space-time adapted coordinates, as opposed E = −∇φ − ; r2φ + (r · A) = 0; to the barycentric coordinates that the Whitney forms (and @t @t their higher-degree generalizations) are typically expressed in @φ terms of. B = r × A; A + r r · A + = 0; @t We introduce a novel characterization of Whitney forms and their Hodge dual with respect to a pseudo-Riemannian metric where is the d’Alembert (or wave) operator. The following that is independent of the choice of coordinates, and then apply gauge transformation leaves the equations invariant, it to a variational discretization of the covariant formulation of Maxwell’s equations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Language of Differential Forms
    Appendix A The Language of Differential Forms This appendix—with the only exception of Sect.A.4.2—does not contain any new physical notions with respect to the previous chapters, but has the purpose of deriving and rewriting some of the previous results using a different language: the language of the so-called differential (or exterior) forms. Thanks to this language we can rewrite all equations in a more compact form, where all tensor indices referred to the diffeomorphisms of the curved space–time are “hidden” inside the variables, with great formal simplifications and benefits (especially in the context of the variational computations). The matter of this appendix is not intended to provide a complete nor a rigorous introduction to this formalism: it should be regarded only as a first, intuitive and oper- ational approach to the calculus of differential forms (also called exterior calculus, or “Cartan calculus”). The main purpose is to quickly put the reader in the position of understanding, and also independently performing, various computations typical of a geometric model of gravity. The readers interested in a more rigorous discussion of differential forms are referred, for instance, to the book [22] of the bibliography. Let us finally notice that in this appendix we will follow the conventions introduced in Chap. 12, Sect. 12.1: latin letters a, b, c,...will denote Lorentz indices in the flat tangent space, Greek letters μ, ν, α,... tensor indices in the curved manifold. For the matter fields we will always use natural units = c = 1. Also, unless otherwise stated, in the first three Sects.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1905.00851V1 [Cs.CV] 2 May 2019 Sibly Nonconvex) Continuous Function on X × Y × R That Is Polyconvex (See Def.2) in the Jacobian Matrix Ξ
    Lifting Vectorial Variational Problems: A Natural Formulation based on Geometric Measure Theory and Discrete Exterior Calculus Thomas Möllenhoff and Daniel Cremers Technical University of Munich {thomas.moellenhoff,cremers}@tum.de Abstract works [30, 31, 29, 55, 39,9, 10, 14] we consider the way less explored continuous (infinite-dimensional) setting. Numerous tasks in imaging and vision can be formu- Our motivation partly stems from the fact that formula- lated as variational problems over vector-valued maps. We tions in function space are very general and admit a variety approach the relaxation and convexification of such vecto- of discretizations. Finite difference discretizations of con- rial variational problems via a lifting to the space of cur- tinuous relaxations often lead to models that are reminis- rents. To that end, we recall that functionals with poly- cent of MRFs [70], while piecewise-linear approximations convex Lagrangians can be reparametrized as convex one- are related to discrete-continuous MRFs [71], see [17, 40]. homogeneous functionals on the graph of the function. More recently, for the Kantorovich relaxation in optimal This leads to an equivalent shape optimization problem transport, approximations with deep neural networks were over oriented surfaces in the product space of domain and considered and achieved promising performance, for exam- codomain. A convex formulation is then obtained by relax- ple in generative modeling [2, 54]. ing the search space from oriented surfaces to more gen- We further argue that fractional (non-integer) solutions eral currents. We propose a discretization of the resulting to a careful discretization of the continuous model can infinite-dimensional optimization problem using Whitney implicitly approximate an “integer” continuous solution.
    [Show full text]
  • VISUALIZING EXTERIOR CALCULUS Contents Introduction 1 1. Exterior
    VISUALIZING EXTERIOR CALCULUS GREGORY BIXLER Abstract. Exterior calculus, broadly, is the structure of differential forms. These are usually presented algebraically, or as computational tools to simplify Stokes' Theorem. But geometric objects like forms should be visualized! Here, I present visualizations of forms that attempt to capture their geometry. Contents Introduction 1 1. Exterior algebra 2 1.1. Vectors and dual vectors 2 1.2. The wedge of two vectors 3 1.3. Defining the exterior algebra 4 1.4. The wedge of two dual vectors 5 1.5. R3 has no mixed wedges 6 1.6. Interior multiplication 7 2. Integration 8 2.1. Differential forms 9 2.2. Visualizing differential forms 9 2.3. Integrating differential forms over manifolds 9 3. Differentiation 11 3.1. Exterior Derivative 11 3.2. Visualizing the exterior derivative 13 3.3. Closed and exact forms 14 3.4. Future work: Lie derivative 15 Acknowledgments 16 References 16 Introduction What's the natural way to integrate over a smooth manifold? Well, a k-dimensional manifold is (locally) parametrized by k coordinate functions. At each point we get k tangent vectors, which together form an infinitesimal k-dimensional volume ele- ment. And how should we measure this element? It seems reasonable to ask for a function f taking k vectors, so that • f is linear in each vector • f is zero for degenerate elements (i.e. when vectors are linearly dependent) • f is smooth These are the properties of a differential form. 1 2 GREGORY BIXLER Introducing structure to a manifold usually follows a certain pattern: • Create it in Rn.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonlocal Exterior Calculus on Riemannian Manifolds
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Mathematics NONLOCAL EXTERIOR CALCULUS ON RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS A Dissertation in Mathematics by Thinh Duc Le c 2013 Thinh Duc Le Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2013 ii The dissertation of Thinh Duc Le was reviewed and approved* by the following: Qiang Du Verne M. Willaman Professor of Mathematics Dissertation Adviser Chair of Committee Long-Qing Chen Distinguished Professor of Material Sciences and Engineering Ping Xu Distinguished Professor of Mathematics Mathieu Stienon Associate Professor of Mathematics Svetlana Katok Director of Graduate Studies, Department of Mathematics *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. iii Abstract Exterior calculus and differential forms are basic mathematical concepts that have been around for centuries. Variations of these concepts have also been made over the years such as the discrete exterior calculus and the finite element exterior calculus. In this work, motivated by the recent studies of nonlocal vector calculus we develop a nonlocal exterior calculus framework on Riemannian manifolds which mimics many properties of the standard (local/smooth) exterior calculus. However the key difference is that nonlocal \interactions" (functions, operators, fields,...) are not required to be smooth. Also any point/particle can interact directly with any other point/particle in the studied domain (at least in principle). Just as in the standard context, we introduce all necessary elements of exterior calculus such as forms, vector fields, exterior derivatives, etc. We point out the relationships between these elements with the known ones in (local) exterior calcu- lus, discrete exterior calculus, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Space–Time Exterior Calculus
    mathematics Article An Introduction to Space–Time Exterior Calculus Ivano Colombaro 1,* , Josep Font-Segura 1 and Alfonso Martinez 1 1 Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08018 Barcelona, Spain; [email protected] (J.F.-S.); [email protected] (A.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-93-542-1496 Received: 21 May 2019; Accepted: 18 June 2019; Published: 21 June 2019 Abstract: The basic concepts of exterior calculus for space–time multivectors are presented: Interior and exterior products, interior and exterior derivatives, oriented integrals over hypersurfaces, circulation and flux of multivector fields. Two Stokes theorems relating the exterior and interior derivatives with circulation and flux, respectively, are derived. As an application, it is shown how the exterior-calculus space–time formulation of the electromagnetic Maxwell equations and Lorentz force recovers the standard vector-calculus formulations, in both differential and integral forms. Keywords: exterior calculus, exterior algebra, electromagnetism, Maxwell equations, differential forms, tensor calculus 1. Introduction Vector calculus has, since its introduction by J. W. Gibbs [1] and Heaviside, been the tool of choice to represent many physical phenomena. In mechanics, hydrodynamics and electromagnetism, quantities such as forces, velocities and currents are modeled as vector fields in space, while flux, circulation, divergence or curl describe operations on the vector fields themselves. With relativity theory, it was observed that space and time are not independent but just coordinates in space–time [2] (pp. 111–120). Tensors like the Faraday tensor in electromagnetism were quickly adopted as a natural representation of fields in space–time [3] (pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Hodge Laplacians on Simplicial Meshes and Graphs
    © 2015 Kaushik Kalyanaraman HODGE LAPLACIANS ON SIMPLICIAL MESHES AND GRAPHS BY KAUSHIK KALYANARAMAN DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2015 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Anil N. Hirani, Chair, Director of Research Associate Professor Alan Demlow, Texas A&M University Professor Jeff Erickson Professor Michael Heath Abstract We present in this dissertation some developments in the discretizations of exterior calculus for problems posed on simplicial discretization (meshes) of geometric manifolds and analogous prob- lems on abstract simplicial complexes. We are primarily interested in discretizations of elliptic type partial differential equations, and our model problem is the Hodge Laplacian Poisson problem on differential 푘-forms on 푛-dimensional manifolds. One of our major contributions in this work is the computational quantification of the solution using the weak mixed formulation of this problem on simplicial meshes using discrete exterior calculus (DEC), and its comparisons with the solution due to a different discretization framework, namely, finite element exterior calculus (FEEC). Conse- quently, our important computational result is that the solution of the Poisson problem on different manifolds in two- and three-dimensions due to DEC recovers convergence properties on many se- quences of refined meshes similar to that of FEEC. We also discuss some potential attempts for showing this convergence theoretically. In particular, we demonstrate that a certain formulation of a variational crimes approach that can be used for showing convergence for a generalized FEEC may not be directly applicable to DEC convergence in its current formulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Finite Element Exterior Calculus, Homological Techniques, and Applications
    Acta Numerica (2006), pp. 1–155 c Cambridge University Press, 2006 doi: 10.1017/S0962492906210018 Printed in the United Kingdom Finite element exterior calculus, homological techniques, and applications Douglas N. Arnold∗ Institute for Mathematics and its Applications and School of Mathematics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA E-mail: [email protected] Richard S. Falk† Department of Mathematics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA E-mail: [email protected] Ragnar Winther‡ Centre of Mathematics for Applications and Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, PO Box 1053, 0316 Oslo, Norway E-mail: [email protected] Dedicated to Carme, Rena, and Rita Finite element exterior calculus is an approach to the design and understand- ing of finite element discretizations for a wide variety of systems of partial differential equations. This approach brings to bear tools from differential geometry, algebraic topology, and homological algebra to develop discretiza- tions which are compatible with the geometric, topological, and algebraic structures which underlie well-posedness of the PDE problem being solved. In the finite element exterior calculus, many finite element spaces are re- vealed as spaces of piecewise polynomial differential forms. These connect to each other in discrete subcomplexes of elliptic differential complexes, and are also related to the continuous elliptic complex through projections which commute with the complex differential. Applications are made to the finite element discretization of a variety of problems, including the Hodge Lapla- cian, Maxwell’s equations, the equations of elasticity, and elliptic eigenvalue problems, and also to preconditioners. ∗ Supported in part by NSF grant DMS-0411388.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading 4: Calculus on Manifolds
    Reading 4: Calculus on Manifolds Due April 9, 2019 REMINDER: The goal of this assignment is to explore how shape analysis can be used in a disci- pline you find interesting. We’ll provide a few suggestions for further reading, but do not let these stop you from exploring! The papers we link are not necessarily the best in their respective fields, just places to get you started. For this reading you can choose any paper on vector fields, exterior calculus, or the Laplacian operator. See the previous reading assignment for pointers for the Laplacian operator, including many in the machine learning literature. Discrete Exterior Calculus A lot of the continuous language of exterior calculus translates quite beautifully to the discrete case. Here’s a few representative papers: • Discrete Exterior Calculus, Desbrun et al., arXiv 2005. • Weighted Triangulations for Geometry Processing, de Goes et al., TOG 2014. • HOT: Hodge-Optimized Triangulations, Mullen et al., SIGGRAPH 2011. • Subdivision Exterior Calculus for Geometry Processing, de Goes et al., TOG 2016. An alternative technique applies ideas we’ve developed in earlier lectures involving the Finite Element Method (FEM). If you’re looking for a challenge, this neglected mathematical work likely has applications/interest in computer science that are largely neglected (so far!): • Finite Element Exterior Calculus, Homological Techniques, and Applications, Arnold et al., Acta Numerica 2006. Vector Fields Vector fields are fundamental objects in differential geometry. The following papers give an in- troduction to possible ways of discretizing vector fields on discrete domains, alongside a few applications: • Vector Field Processing on Triangle Meshes, de Goes et al., SIGGRAPH Asia course notes, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Pydec: Software and Algorithms for Discretization of Exterior Calculus
    PyDEC: Software and Algorithms for Discretization of Exterior Calculus NATHAN BELL, Google Inc. ANIL N. HIRANI, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign This article describes the algorithms, features, and implementation of PyDEC, a Python library for computa- tions related to the discretization of exterior calculus. PyDEC facilitates inquiry into both physical problems on manifolds as well as purely topological problems on abstract complexes. We describe efficient algorithms for constructing the operators and objects that arise in discrete exterior calculus, lowest-order finite element exterior calculus, and in related topological problems. Our algorithms are formulated in terms of high-level matrix operations which extend to arbitrary dimension. As a result, our implementations map well to the 3 facilities of numerical libraries such as NumPy and SciPy. The availability of such libraries makes Python suitable for prototyping numerical methods. We demonstrate how PyDEC is used to solve physical and topological problems through several concise examples. Categories and Subject Descriptors: G.4 [Mathematical Software]: ; G.1.8 [Numerical Analysis]: Par- tial Differential Equations—Finite element methods, finite volume methods; I.3.5 [Computer Graphics]: Computational Geometry and Object Modeling—Geometric algorithms, languages, and systems General Terms: Algorithms, Theory, Experimentation, Design Additional Key Words and Phrases: Discrete exterior calculus, finite element exterior calculus, Whitney form, simplicial complex, cubical complex, Vietoris-Rips complex, computational topology, boundary operator, coboundary operator, chain, cochain ACM Reference Format: Bell, N. and Hirani, A. N. 2012. PyDEC: Software and algorithms for discretization of exterior calculus. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 39, 1, Article 3 (November 2012), 41 pages. DOI = 10.1145/2382585.2382588 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2382585.2382588 1.
    [Show full text]