Reduction of CCR5 with Low-Dose Rapamycin Enhances the Antiviral Activity of Vicriviroc Against Both Sensitive and Drug-Resistant HIV-1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reduction of CCR5 with Low-Dose Rapamycin Enhances the Antiviral Activity of Vicriviroc Against Both Sensitive and Drug-Resistant HIV-1 Reduction of CCR5 with low-dose rapamycin enhances the antiviral activity of vicriviroc against both sensitive and drug-resistant HIV-1 Alonso Heredia1,2, Olga Latinovic1, Robert C. Gallo2, Gregory Melikyan, Marv Reitz, Nhut Le, and Robert R. Redfield2 Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201 Contributed by Robert C. Gallo, October 27, 2008 (sent for review August 25, 2008) Vicriviroc (VCV) is a chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 5 (CCR5) We previously have demonstrated that low doses of the antagonist with potent anti-HIV activity that currently is being transplant drug rapamycin (RAPA) reduce CCR5 density, in- evaluated in phase III clinical trials. In the present study, donor hibit R5 HIV-1, and enhance T-20 antiviral activity (14, 15). In CCR5 density (CCR5 receptors/CD4 lymphocytes) inversely corre- the present study we show that the combination of RAPA and /VCV has considerable antiviral synergy. Moreover, the RAPA ؍ lated with VCV antiviral activity (Spearman’s correlation test; r Low doses of the transplant drug rapamycin VCV combination is active against VCV-resistant HIV-1. These .(0.0034 ؍ P ,0.746 (RAPA) reduced CCR5 density and enhanced VCV antiviral activity. findings suggest the use of RAPA in patients as a strategy for In drug interaction studies, the RAPA/VCV combination had con- enhancing the antiviral activity of VCV and perhaps of other siderable antiviral synergy (combination indexes of 0.1–0.04) in CCR5 antagonists as well. both multicycle and single-cycle infection of lymphocytes. The synergy between RAPA and VCV translated into dose reduction Results indexes of 8- to 41-fold reductions for RAPA and 19- to 658-fold Impact of CCR5 Density on the Antiviral Activity of VCV. We first reductions for VCV. RAPA enhanced VCV antiviral activity against evaluated the effect of CCR5 levels on the antiviral activity of both B and non-B clade isolates, potently suppressing clade G VCV using cell lines JC10 (ϳ 2 ϫ 103 CCR5/cell) and JC57 (ϳ viruses with reported reduced sensitivities to VCV and to the 9 ϫ 103 CCR5/cell), which express CD4 levels similar to those in licensed CCR5 antagonist maraviroc. Importantly, RAPA reduction normal CD4 T cells and whose CCR5 densities correspond to the of CCR5 density in lymphocytes sensitized VCV-resistant strains to approximate lower and upper levels of CCR5 expression in ϳ VCV, inhibiting virus production by 90%. We further demon- donors (9–12). We infected each clone with the R5 HIV-1 strains strated the role of CCR5 density on VCV activity against resistant JRFL and CC1/85 (multiplicity of infection, MOI ϭ 0.01) in the virus in donor lymphocytes and in cell lines expressing varying presence of varying concentrations of VCV (0.03–30 nM) for 3 h. CCR5 densities. Together, these results suggest that low doses of For comparison, cells also were infected in the presence of the RAPA may increase the durability of VCV-containing regimens in reverse transcriptase inhibitor efavirenz (0.003–3 nM). On day 4 patients by enhancing VCV viral suppression, by allowing the use after infection, HIV-1 p24 levels in the culture supernatants of lower doses of VCV with reduced potential for toxicity, and by were determined by ELISA (National Cancer Institute). VCV controlling emerging VCV-resistant variants. inhibited HIV-1 JRFL replication in the JC-10 and JC-57 clones with EC values of 0.02 and 0.25 nM, respectively (Fig. 1A). In chemokine receptor 5 antagonists ͉ coreceptor density ͉ HIV resistance ͉ 50 contrast, EC values for efavirenz were similar (less than vicriviroc resistance ͉ maraviroc 50 twofold change) in both cell lines (data not shown). Similar results were obtained with HIV-1 CC1/85 (data not shown). ighly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has improved These data suggest that variations in CCR5 density within the Htreatment of HIV-1 infected individuals considerably (1). range observed in most individuals (ϳ 2 ϫ 103-1 ϫ 104 receptors/ However, the success of current therapies is limited by the CD4 T cell) greatly affect the antiviral activity of VCV. emergence of drug-resistant strains, the need for sustained We next evaluated the effect of CCR5 density on VCV activity adherence to complex regimens, and the potential for drug in infectivity assays using lymphocytes from different donors as toxicity (2, 3). The two new antiretroviral classes of integrase and target cells. Coreceptor CCR5 density was quantified for each entry inhibitors may help overcome some of the current limita- donor cell by quantitative flow cytometry analysis. Cells were tions of HAART (4, 5). Entry inhibitors are especially attractive infected with the R5 strain HIV-1 JRFL (MOI ϭ 0.001) for 3 h because they target HIV at the earliest step of the viral cycle and in the presence of varying concentrations of VCV. Virus pro- are effective against strains resistant to inhibitors of protease and duction was measured on day 5 after infection by p24 levels in reverse transcriptase. Entry inhibitors interfere with HIV bind- the supernatants. Results are summarized in Fig. 1B. Among ing to CD4 receptor (attachment inhibitors) or chemokine (C-C different donors, CCR5 density on CD4 T cells varied between 1.9 motif) receptor 5 (CCR5)/chemokine (C-X-C- motif) receptor 4 and 7 ϫ 103 CCR5 receptors/cell. In contrast, measured CD4 (CXCR4) coreceptors (coreceptor antagonists) or by preventing density values were similar among the donors (range of 22.4–27.0 ϫ fusion between cellular and viral membranes (fusion inhibitors) (5). Currently, the fusion inhibitor T-20 (enfuvirtide) and the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc (Selzentry) are the only licensed Author contributions: A.H., O.L., R.C.G., G.M., and R.R.R. designed research; A.H., O.L., and entry inhibitors (6, 7). The CCR5 antagonist vicriviroc (VCV) N.L. performed research; A.H., O.L., G.M., M.R., and R.R.R. analyzed data; and A.H. and presently is in phase III clinical trials (8). Coreceptor CCR5 R.R.R. wrote the paper. antagonists inhibit CCR5-tropic HIV-1 (referred to as ‘‘R5 The authors declare no conflict of interest. HIV-1’’) strains, which are responsible for most transmissions 1These authors contributed equally to this work. and generally are present throughout the course of infection. In 2To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: [email protected], normal individuals, CCR5 density (receptors/cell) on CD4 lym- [email protected], or rredfi[email protected]. 3 3 phocytes ranges between ϳ 2 ϫ 10 and ϳ 10 ϫ 10 (9–12), and This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/ this variation influences disease progression and response to 0810843106/DCSupplemental. therapy in HIV-1 infection (11, 13). © 2008 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA 20476–20481 ͉ PNAS ͉ December 23, 2008 ͉ vol. 105 ͉ no. 51 www.pnas.org͞cgi͞doi͞10.1073͞pnas.0810843106 Downloaded by guest on September 28, 2021 Fig. 1. CCR5 density impacts the antiviral activity of VCV. (A) Effect of CCR5 density on VCV antiviral activity in cell lines. The HeLa clones HI-JC10 and HI-JC57 were infected with the R5 strain HIV-1 JRFL in the presence of the indicated concentrations of VCV. Virus production was measured by p24 ELISA on day 4 after infection, and data were used to determine EC50 values. Data are means Ϯ SD of two experiments. (B) CCR5 density on primary CD4ϩ cells correlates with antiviral activity of VCV. Activated PBMCs from different donors were subjected to flow cytometry analysis and infection with the R5 strain HIV-1 JRFL in the presence of varying concentrations of VCV. On day 5 Fig. 2. Effect of RAPA on the antiviral activities of VCV and efavirenz in a after infection, virus production was determined by measuring p24 levels. VCV multicycle replication assay. RAPA-pretreated PBMCs were infected with EC50 values were plotted against CCR5 density values on the day of infection. HIV-1 JRFL in the presence of the indicated concentrations of VCV and efa- Line fit was done by linear regression. r, Spearman correlation coefficient. virenz. (A) Virus production was determined by measuring p24 levels on day 5 after infection. (B) Cell viability was determined by the MTT assay on day 5 after infection. Data (means Ϯ SD) are from one representative experiment of 3 10 CD4 receptors/cell) (data not shown). These density values for three independent experiments. CCR5 and CD4 are within the ranges reported by others (9–12). Interestingly, VCV EC50 values varied ϳ 20-fold among the dif- ferent donors and correlated positively with CCR5 densities (Spear- indexes (CI) at RAPA/VCV ratios of 3/10 and 3/100. We chose man’s correlation test; r ϭ 0.746, P ϭ 0.0034). A similar correlation these drug ratios based on previous determinations of EC50 between CCR5 density and VCV EC50 was obtained using HIV-1 values for each drug. Data were analyzed using the CalcuSyn CC1/85 (data not shown). In a control experiment assessing the software, and results are summarized in Table S1. When used donor cells’ ability to support virus replication, we infected cells alone, RAPA and VCV inhibited virus replication with dose at with the X4 strain HIV-1 IIIb and found p24 values varying by less 50% inhibition (Dm, equivalent to EC50) values of 0.25 and 2.78 than threefold among the different donors (data not shown). nM, respectively. However, when combined at a RAPA/VCV Together, these results using donor cells (Fig. 1B) suggest that ratio of 3/10, the Dm value for RAPA was reduced to 0.03 nM, variations of CCR5 density among individuals considerably affect and the Dm value for VCV was reduced to 0.10 nM.
Recommended publications
  • Revised 4/1/2021 GEORGIA MEDICAID FEE-FOR-SERVICE HIV
    GEORGIA MEDICAID FEE-FOR-SERVICE HIV-AIDS PA SUMMARY Preferred (may not be all inclusive) Non-Preferred Abacavir generic Abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine generic Abacavir/lamivudine generic Aptivus (tipranavir) Complera (emtricitabine/rilpivirine/tenofovir disoproxil Atazanavir capsules generic fumarate) Atripla (efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil Crixivan (indinavir) fumarate) Biktarvy (bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir Delstrigo (doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil alafenamide) fumarate) Cimduo (lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) Fuzeon (enfuvirtide) Descovy (emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide) Intelence (etravirine) Dovato Invirase (saquinavir) Edurant (rilpivirine)* Lexiva (fosamprenavir) Efavirenz tablets generic Nevirapine extended-release generic Emtriva (emtricitabine) Norvir Powder (ritonavir) Epivir solution (lamivudine) Pifeltro (doravirine) Evotaz (atazanavir/cobicistat)* Reyataz Powder (atazanavir) Genvoya (elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/ Ritonavir tablets generic tenofovir alafenamide) Isentress and Isentress HD (raltegravir)* Rukobia (fostemsavir) Juluca (dolutegravir/rilpivirine) Selzentry (maraviroc) Kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir) Stavudine generic^ Stribild (elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/ tenofovir Lamivudine generic disoproxil fumarate) Symfi (efavirenz 600 mg/lamivudine/tenofovir Lamivudine/zidovudine generic disoproxil fumarate) Symfi Lo (efavirenz 400 mg/lamivudine/tenofovir Nevirapine immediate-release tablets generic disoproxil fumarate) Norvir (ritonavir) Temixys (lamivudine/tenofovir
    [Show full text]
  • Targeting Fibrosis in the Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Mice Model: an Uphill Battle
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.20.427485; this version posted January 21, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Title: Targeting fibrosis in the Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy mice model: an uphill battle 2 Marine Theret1#, Marcela Low1#, Lucas Rempel1, Fang Fang Li1, Lin Wei Tung1, Osvaldo 3 Contreras3,4, Chih-Kai Chang1, Andrew Wu1, Hesham Soliman1,2, Fabio M.V. Rossi1 4 1School of Biomedical Engineering and the Biomedical Research Centre, Department of Medical 5 Genetics, 2222 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada 6 2Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Minia 7 University, Minia, Egypt 8 3Developmental and Stem Cell Biology Division, Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, 9 Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia 10 4Departamento de Biología Celular y Molecular and Center for Aging and Regeneration (CARE- 11 ChileUC), Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 8331150 12 Santiago, Chile 13 # Denotes Co-first authorship 14 15 Keywords: drug screening, fibro/adipogenic progenitors, fibrosis, repair, skeletal muscle. 16 Correspondence to: 17 Marine Theret 18 School of Biomedical Engineering and the Biomedical Research Centre 19 University of British Columbia 20 2222 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia 21 Tel: +1(604) 822 0441 fax: +1(604) 822 7815 22 Email: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.20.427485; this version posted January 21, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article PDF/Slides
    Kan Lu, PharmD New Antiretrovirals for Based on a presentation at prn by Roy M. Gulick, md, mph the Treatment of HIV: Kan Lu, PharmD | Drug Development Fellow University of North Carolina School of Pharmacy Chapel Hill, North Carolina The View in 2006 Roy M. Gulick, md, mph Reprinted from The prn Notebook® | october 2006 | Dr. James F. Braun, Editor-in-Chief Director, Cornell Clinical Trials Unit | Associate Professor of Medicine, Meri D. Pozo, PhD, Managing Editor. Published in New York City by the Physicians’ Research Network, Inc.® Weill Medical College of Cornell University | New York, New York John Graham Brown, Executive Director. For further information and other articles available online, visit http://www.prn.org | All rights reserved. ©october 2006 substantial progress continues to be made in the arena of cokinetics and a long extracellular half-life of approximately 10 hours antiretroviral drug development. prn is again proud to present its annual (Zhu, 2003). During apricitabine’s development, a serious drug interac- review of the experimental agents to watch for in the coming months and tion with lamivudine (Epivir) was noted. Although the plasma years. This year’s review is based on a lecture by Dr. Roy M. Gulick, a long- concentrations of apricitabine were unaffected by coadministration of time friend of prn, and no stranger to the antiretroviral development lamivudine, the intracellular concentrations of apricitabine were reduced pipeline. by approximately sixfold. Additionally, the 50% inhibitory concentration To date, twenty-two antiretrovirals have been approved by the Food (ic50) of apricitabine against hiv with the M184V mutation was increased and Drug Administration (fda) for the treatment of hiv infection.
    [Show full text]
  • Viiv Healthcare Drug Class1,4: Antiretroviral Agent, Integrase
    Brand Name: Tivicay Generic Name: dolutegravir Manufacturer1: ViiV Healthcare Drug Class1,4: Antiretroviral Agent, Integrase Inhibitor Labeled Uses4,5: Labeled1,4: In combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in adults and children aged 12 years and older and weighing at least 40 kg. Mechanism of Action1,2: Dolutegravir inhibits the catalytic activity of HIV integrase, which is an HIV encoded enzyme required for viral replication. Integrase is one of the three HIV-1 enzymes required for viral replication. Integration of HIV into cellular DNA is a multi-step process. First, the assembly of integrase in a stable complex with the viral DNA occurs. Second, the terminal dinucleotides from each end of the viral DNA are removed by endonucleolytic processing. Lastly, the viral DNA 3' ends are covalently linked to the cellular (target) DNA by strand transfer. The last two processes, which are catalytic, require integrase to be appropriately assembled on a specific viral DNA substrate. Inhibition of integrase by dolutegravir prevents the covalent insertion, or integration, of unintegrated linear HIV DNA into the host cell genome preventing the formation of the HIV provirus. The provirus is required to direct the production of progeny virus, so inhibiting integration prevents propagation of the viral infection. Pharmacokinetics1: Absorption: Tmax 2-3 hours Vd 17.4L T1/2 14 hours Clearance 1.0 L/h Protein Binding >98.9% Bioavailability Not established Metabolism1,2: Dolutegravir is primarily metabolized via UGT1A1 with some contribution from CYP3A. Metabolism occurs via UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)1A1 (major) and by the hepatic isoenzyme CYP3A (minor).
    [Show full text]
  • HIV Integrase Inhibitor Pharmacogenetics and Clinical Outcomes: an Exploratory Association Study Derek E
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 8-2018 HIV Integrase Inhibitor Pharmacogenetics and Clinical Outcomes: An Exploratory Association Study Derek E. Murrell East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Other Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Commons, Pharmacology Commons, and the Virus Diseases Commons Recommended Citation Murrell, Derek E., "HIV Integrase Inhibitor Pharmacogenetics and Clinical Outcomes: An Exploratory Association Study" (2018). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3465. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3465 This Dissertation - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HIV Integrase Inhibitor Pharmacogenetics and Clinical Outcomes: An Exploratory Association Study _____________________ A dissertation presented to the faculty of the Department of Biomedical Sciences East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Biomedical Sciences, Pharmaceutical Sciences Concentration _____________________ by Derek Edward Murrell August 2018 _____________________ Sam Harirforoosh, PharmD, PhD, Chair Jonathan Moorman, MD, PhD David Roane, PhD Robert Schoborg, PhD Zhi Qiang Yao, MD, PhD Keywords: Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor, Dolutegravir, Elvitegravir, Raltegravir, Pharmacogenetics, HIV, Renal, Hepatic, Adverse events ABSTRACT HIV Integrase Inhibitor Pharmacogenetics and Clinical Outcomes: An Exploratory Association Study by Derek Edward Murrell As HIV is now primarily a chronic condition, treatment is given life-long with changes as necessitated by alterations in tolerability and efficacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbicides 2008
    State of the Network Ian McGowan & Sharon Hillier Annual Meeting March 14th, 2016 HIV Infection in the US HIV Infection in US MSM HIV Infection in US Women Global HIV Infection HIV Incidence Rates in ASPIRE & RING Studies ASPIRE Study RING Study 10 8 6 4 2 HIV Incidence Rates (%) Rates Incidence HIV 0 <21 years > 25 years 18-21 years22-26 years27-45 years 21-25 years The PrEP Landscape in 2016 (1) • Oral PrEP – Optimization of Truvada delivery – Increasing availability – US, Canada, France, South Africa, Kenya, Israel – 2nd generation regimens being evaluated • Maraviroc combinations • Tenofovir alafenamide – New molecules • EFdA (Merck) The PrEP Landscape in 2016 (2) • Injectable PrEP – Rilpivirine & Cabotegravir • Intravaginal rings – Phase 3 • Dapivirine – Phase 1/2 • Tenofovir • Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate • Vicriviroc + MK 2048 • Dapivirine + Levonorgestrol The PrEP Landscape in 2016 (3) • Rectal microbicides – Phase 2 • Reduced glycerin tenofovir gel – Phase 1 • Maraviroc • Dapivirine • Griffithsin • MIV-150 / Carageenan / Zinc • Implantable PrEP MTN Highlights from the Past Year The MTN Portfolio 2015 / 2016 Studies in Ongoing development: Completed studies MTN-026 studies MTN-030 MTN-015 MTN-031 MTN-017 MTN-016 MTN-032 MTN-020 MTN-023 MTN-033 MTN-024 MTN-027 MTN-028 MTN-034 MTN-029 MTN-035 MTN-036 MTN-037 Intravaginal Ring Studies • Dapivirine • Vicriviroc / MK-2048 – MTN-020 – MTN-027 & MTN-028 – MTN-023 • Dapivirine 200 mg – MTN-025 (HOPE) IVR – MTN-029 – MTN-036 / IPM 047 – MTN-031 – MTN-034 • Dapivirine / Levonorgestrel – MTN-030 / IPM 041 Rectal Microbicide Studies • Tenofovir gel – MTN-017 • Dapivirine gel – MTN-026 – MTN-033 – MTN-035 CHARM-02 Study (Hiruy H et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Semen-Mediated Enhancement of HIV-1 Infection Markedly Impairs the Antiviral Efficacy of Microbicides
    Institute of Molecular Virology Ulm University Medical Center Prof. Dr. Frank Kirchhoff Semen-mediated enhancement of HIV-1 infection markedly impairs the antiviral efficacy of microbicides Dissertation to obtain the Doctoral Degree of Human Biology (Dr. biol. hum.) at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ulm presented by Onofrio Zirafi Heidenheim an der Brenz 2014 Present Dean: Prof. Dr. Thomas Wirth 1st reviewer: Prof. Dr. Jan Münch 2nd reviewer: Prof. Dr. Barbara Spellerberg Date of graduation: 5th December 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS III TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................. V 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 HIV LIFE CYCLE AND ANTIRETROVIRAL DRUGS .......................................................... 2 1.2 HIV TRANSMISSION ................................................................................................... 4 1.3 FACTORS IN SEMEN MODULATING HIV-1 INFECTION .................................................. 5 1.4 MECHANISM OF INFECTION ENHANCEMENT BY SEMINAL AMYLOIDS ........................... 6 1.5 COUNTERACTING AMYLOID-MEDIATED ENHANCEMENT OF HIV-1 INFECTION ............ 6 1.6 STRUCTURE-BASED PEPTIDE INHIBITORS OF AMYLOID FORMATION ............................. 7 1.7 MICROBICIDES ............................................................................................................ 8 1.8 SCIENTIFIC AIM ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,732,399 B2 Goldenberg Et Al
    US007732399B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,732,399 B2 Goldenberg et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Jun. 8, 2010 (54) SUSTAINED RELEASE FORMULATIONS 2002fO151582 A1 10, 2002 Dou et al. 2003/O190307 A1* 10, 2003 DiBiase et al. ............. 424,856 (75) Inventors: Merrill S. Goldenberg, Thousand Oaks, 2004/0142048 A1 7/2004 Moore et al. CA (US); Jian Hua Gu, Thousand Oaks 2005/0180925 A1* 8/2005 Chaudry ...................... 424/46 CA (US s s 2005/0215470 A1 9/2005 Ng et al. FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (73) Assignee: Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA (US) GB 92.9405 A 6, 1963 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this GB 1234.805. A 6, 1971 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 W W 3. t E. U.S.C. 154(b) by 193 days. WO WO99,04764 2, 1999 This patent is Subject to a terminal dis- W W 995, 239, claimer. WO WO 2004/O12522 2, 2004 (21) Appl. No.: 11/847,984 OTHER PUBLICATIONS 1-1. Yan et al. Identification of histatins as tannin-binding proteins in (22) Filed: Aug. 30, 2007 human saliva. Biochemical Journal. 1995, vol. 311, pp. 341-347.* O O Charlton, A. J. et al., “Polyphenol/Peptide Binding and Precipita (65) Prior Publication Data tion.” J. Agric. Food Chem. 50, pp. 1593-1601 (2002); published by US 2007/0292506 A1 Dec. 20, 2007 Chasin,American M.. Chemical “Biodegradable Society. Polymers for Controlled Drug Deliv O O ery,” J.O. Hollinger Editor, Biomedical Applications of Synthetic Related U.S. Application Data Biodegradable Polymers CRC, Boca Raton, FL (1995), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of PRAC Meeting on 09-12 July 2018
    6 September 2018 EMA/PRAC/576790/2018 Inspections, Human Medicines Pharmacovigilance and Committees Division Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) Minutes of the meeting on 09-12 July 2018 Chair: June Raine – Vice-Chair: Almath Spooner Health and safety information In accordance with the Agency’s health and safety policy, delegates were briefed on health, safety and emergency information and procedures prior to the start of the meeting. Disclaimers Some of the information contained in the minutes is considered commercially confidential or sensitive and therefore not disclosed. With regard to intended therapeutic indications or procedure scope listed against products, it must be noted that these may not reflect the full wording proposed by applicants and may also change during the course of the review. Additional details on some of these procedures will be published in the PRAC meeting highlights once the procedures are finalised. Of note, the minutes are a working document primarily designed for PRAC members and the work the Committee undertakes. Note on access to documents Some documents mentioned in the minutes cannot be released at present following a request for access to documents within the framework of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 as they are subject to on- going procedures for which a final decision has not yet been adopted. They will become public when adopted or considered public according to the principles stated in the Agency policy on access to documents (EMA/127362/2006, Rev. 1). 30 Churchill Place ● Canary Wharf ● London E14 5EU ● United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 3660 6000 Facsimile +44 (0)20 3660 5555 Send a question via our website www.ema.europa.eu/contact An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • EVOTAZ (Atazanavir Or Cobicistat) to Pregnant Rats and Rabbits (See Data)
    HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION • Assess creatinine clearance (CLcr) before initiating treatment. Consider These highlights do not include all the information needed to use EVOTAZ alternative medications that do not require dosage adjustments in patients safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for EVOTAZ. with renal impairment. (5.3) • When cobicistat, a component of EVOTAZ, is used in combination with a EVOTAZ (atazanavir and cobicistat) tablet, for oral use tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF)-containing regimen, cases of Initial U.S. Approval: 2015 acute renal failure and Fanconi syndrome have been reported. (5.4) • When used with tenofovir DF, assess urine glucose and urine protein at ---------------------------RECENT MAJOR CHANGES--------------------------­ baseline and monitor CLcr, urine glucose, and urine protein. Monitor serum Indications and Usage phosphorus in patients with or at risk for renal impairment. Coadministration Indications (1.1) 07/2020 with tenofovir DF is not recommended in patients with CLcr below 70 Dosage and Administration mL/min or in patients also receiving a nephrotoxic agent. (5.4) Laboratory Testing Prior to Initiation and During • Chronic kidney disease has been reported during postmarketing surveillance Treatment with EVOTAZ (2.1) 04/2020 in patients with HIV-1 infection treated with atazanavir, with or without Recommended Dosage (2.2) 07/2020 ritonavir. Consider alternatives in patients at high risk for renal disease or Not Recommended During Pregnancy (2.5) 04/2020 with preexisting renal disease. Monitor renal laboratory tests prior to therapy Contraindications (4) 04/2020 and during treatment with EVOTAZ. Consider discontinuation of EVOTAZ Warnings and Precautions in patients with progressive renal disease. (5.5) Immune Reconstitution Syndrome (5.11) 07/2020 • Nephrolithiasis and cholelithiasis have been reported.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Anntoated Product Monograph
    PRODUCT MONOGRAPH INCLUDING PATIENT MEDICATION INFORMATION PrTRIUMEQ dolutegravir, abacavir, and lamivudine tablets 50 mg dolutegravir (as dolutegravir sodium), 600 mg abacavir (as abacavir sulfate) and 300 mg lamivudine Antiretroviral Agent ViiV Healthcare ULC 245, boulevard Armand-Frappier Laval, Quebec H7V 4A7 Date of Revision: January 31, 2020 Submission Control No: 233245 © 2020 ViiV Healthcare group of companies or its licensor Trademarks are owned by or licensed to the ViiV Healthcare group of companies Page 1 of 61 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE PART I: HEALTH PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION ........................................................ 3 SUMMARY PRODUCT INFORMATION ................................................................... 3 INDICATIONS AND CLINICAL USE ........................................................................ 3 CONTRAINDICATIONS ........................................................................................... 4 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS............................................................................ 4 ADVERSE REACTIONS.......................................................................................... 11 DRUG INTERACTIONS .......................................................................................... 19 DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ........................................................................ 24 OVERDOSAGE....................................................................................................... 26 ACTION AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Injectable Antiretroviral Drugs: Back to the Future
    viruses Review Injectable Antiretroviral Drugs: Back to the Future Marco Berruti 1 , Niccolò Riccardi 2, Diana Canetti 3,4 , Sergio Lo Caputo 5 , Lucia Taramasso 6 and Antonio Di Biagio 1,6,* 1 Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy; [email protected] 2 Department of Infectious-Tropical Diseases and Microbiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, 37024 Verona, Italy; [email protected] 3 Clinic of Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20097 Milan, Italy; [email protected] 4 School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20097 Milan, Italy 5 Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy; [email protected] 6 Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, 16132 Genoa, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Current HIV treatment regimens provide sustained virologic suppression, at least partially restore the immune system and have limited side effects; however, they do not allow viral eradication and they are burdened by daily pill intake with a life-long commitment for the people living with HIV (PHIV). Injectable agents might represent a turning point in the care of PHIV, allowing less frequent administration of antiretroviral treatment (ART), more widespread use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and more stable drug levels in the blood, thus increasing the odds to get closer to end the HIV pandemic. The aim of this manuscript is to give a comprehensive review of injectable antiretrovirals that have been used in the past, which are available now, will be available in the future, and their role in the treatment of HIV infection Citation: Berruti, M.; Riccardi, N.; Canetti, D.; Lo Caputo, S.; Taramasso, Keywords: ART; injectable; HIV; antiretroviral; treatment; PrEP L.; Di Biagio, A.
    [Show full text]