Breeding Biology of the Kakerori (Pomarea Dimidiata) on Rarotonga, Cook Islands

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Breeding Biology of the Kakerori (Pomarea Dimidiata) on Rarotonga, Cook Islands Breeding biology of the Kakerori (Pomarea dimidiata) on Rarotonga, Cook Islands By EDWARD K. SAUL'. HUGH A. ROBERTSON2' AND ANNA TIRAA1 'Takiturnu Conservation Area Project, PO. Box 81 7, Rarotonga, Cook Islands; ZScience & Research Unit, Department of Conservation, PO. Box lO-420, Welling- ton, New Zealand. ABSTRACT The breeding biology of Kakerori, or Rarotonga Flycatcher, (Pomarea dimidiata) ~~asstudied during ten years (1987-97) of experimental management aimed at saving this endangered monarch flycatcher from extinction. Kakerori remained territorial all year and were usually monogamous, Most birds kept the same mate from year to year, but pairs that bilrd to raise any young were more likely to divorce than successful pairs. Despite living in the tropics, Kakerori breeding was strictly seasonal. with eggs laid from early October to mid-February, and mostly in late October and early November. Nesting started earlier in years when October was very sunny Most pairs (74%) laid only one clutch, but some pairs laid up to four replacement clutches when nests failed.Three pairs (1%) successfully raised tnro broods in a season. Rat (Rattus spp.) predation was the principal cause of nest failure, especially of nests in pua (mpaea berteriana), the main fruiting tree used by rats during the Kakerori breeding season. Annual breeding productivity was initially poor (0.46 fledglings per breeding pair over two years) and the population was declining, but intensive management since 1989has led to a great increase in productivity (1.07 fledglings perb~edingpairover eight years) and the number ofKakerorihas increased from 29 birds in 1989 to a minimum of 153 birds in 1997. 'Their IUCN consenrationstatus can therefore be lowered from 'critically endangered' to 'endangered'. KEYWORDS: Kakerori, Pomarea dimidiata, breeding, consemtion, Cook Islands, monarch flycatcher. INTRODUCTION The Kakerori, or Rarotonga Flycatcher. (Pornarea dimidiata) is a small endan- gered monarch flycatcher, endemic to Rarotonga. Cook Islands. No published infor- mation is available about the breeding biology of the Kakerori or the other four species of Pomarea flycatchers in eastern Polynesia. Kakerori were verycommon throughout Rarotonga until the middle of the 19th century; however, their numbers declined rapidly and their range became restricted to the forested interior in the late 1880s (Gill 1885). By the early 1900s they were thought to be extinct, but were rediscovered in 1973, and the first nest of the species was found in 1983 (Robertson et dl. 1994). Rod Hay and Gerald McCormack colour- banded eight Kakerori in 1984. and searches from 1984 to 1987 showed that the small population of Kakerori was restricted to dense forest at medium altitude (100- 250 m) in rugged terrain on the wettest side of the island (Robertson et al. 1994). Kakerori are unusual among passerines in exhibiting an extreme form of delayed plumage maturation. The age of birds can be determined from bill and plumage colours for the first three years. until the definitive basic plumage is attained at the 'Authorfor correspondence Notornis 45: 255-269 (1998) @ 1998 Ornitboiogical Society o/New Zealand SAUL et al. start of the fourth year (Robertson et al. 1993). Birds of both sexes are, however, capable of breeding as yearlings. Males are larger than females, and although there is some overlap in measurements, most birds can be sexed from bill length and/or head+ bill length measurements (Robertson et al. 1993). In the field, size &fferences are usually indistinguishable, but the sex of birds can be determined from their behaviour during the breeding season. Since 1987, we have studied the breeding of Kakerori as part of a recovery programme aimed at saving Kakerori from extinction, by firstly determining why they were critically endangered, and then experimentallymanaging their main threats. We found early in our study that Kakerori were declining because ship rats (Rattus rattus) and possibly Pacific rats (Rattus exulans) preyed on eggs and nestlings. Our management since 1989 has been to improve breeding success of Kakerori by seasonal poisoning of rats in the 155 ha of forest occupied by the remnant Kakemri population, and by banding trees to prevent rats from reaching nests (Robertson et al. 1998). Our observations on the breeding success of Kakerori have been used as a measure of the effectiveness of our experimental management. Since 1989, the number of Kakerori has increased more than five-fold, from 29 birds to at least 153 birds in 1997. Because of the critical state of the Kakemri population we maintained a policy of minimal disturbance to nesting birds, so, as many of the nests were high and inaccessible, some of our data on breeding biology are incomplete. Also, as the population has grown, it has become increasingly dBcult to follow the breeding attempts of all pairs. METHODS Study area Rarotonga (21°14'S, 159'46'W) is the highest (653 m) and largest (6700 ha) of the 15 islands in the Cook Islands group. Most of the rugged basaltic interior of Rarotonga is forested and uninhabited. Almost all of the approximately 9000 residents live on the narrow (< 1 km wide), fertile, coastal ringplain. Kakerori are largely restricted to 155 ha in the southeastern part of Rarotonga. This area, known as the Takitumu Conservation Area, comprises lower foothills and steep V-shaped valleys between 100 m and 250 m above sea level (Robertson et al. 194). Most birds are in the upper catchments of the Totokoitu, Turoa and Avana Streams pig. I), but a few are found in the lower parts of these valleys. This is the wetter side of the island, as it faces the south-easttrade winds. Annual rainfall averages 3250 mm in the study area compared with 2021 mm at Rarotonga Airport on the opposite side of the island (Thompson 1986); about two-thirds of the rain falls in the wet season (November through April). Seasonal and diurnal variation in temperatures are minor, with the winter being dry and cool (94 mm rainfall and 21.9"C in July) and the summer being wet and warm (253 mm rainfall and 25.8"C in January) at Rarotonga Airport (Thompson 1986). NOTORNIS 45 KAKERORI 257 Rarotonga FIGURE 1 - Map of Rarotonga, Cook Islands, showing the location of the study area. The vegetation has been described by Merlin (1985) and Sanders et al. (1995). The tall (up to 25 m) vegetation on the moderate to steep slopes is dominated by mato (Homdlium acuminatum), koka (Biscbofiajavanica), karaka (Elaeocarpus tonganus) and matira (Cyclophyllum barbaturn), with a dense understorey of the giant kingfern or ana'e (Angiopteris evecta), kavakava atua (Macropiper lati$olium), and kiekie (Ereycinetia wildenl).Near the valley floor the main trees are mato, pua (Fagraea bertaiam),and 'au (Hibiscustiliaceus) , with a few emergent i'i (Inocalpus fagiffer) and coconuts (Cocos nucifera), and a few scattered mountain lantern-tree or turina (Hernandia moerenhoutiana). On the ridges the vegetation is generally shorter (3-5 m tall) and dominated by pua, neinei (Richia speciosa), mato and rata (Metrosideros collzna). Observations Just before each breeding season, we mist-netted and colour-banded as many yearlings and unbanded older birds as possible. During the concurrent annual censuses, we roughly mapped the territory of each pair and home range of non-territorial birds by plotting locations of birds and their territorial disputes. The proportion of SAUL et al. NOTORNIS 45 individually colour-banded birds in the population has increased from 37% in 1987 to about 80%since 1993, and the number of known-age birds has risen from 42% in 1987 to over 92% in 1997. Through each breeding season, from October to February, we and staff of the Cook Islands Conservation Service and then Environment Service, searched for Kakerori nests. For each nesting pair, we kept detailed notes on the colour-band combinations, bill and plumage colours of the birds, the territory they were using, height of the nest up the tree and vertically to the ground, species of tree, position of the nest, and details on behaviour of the birds that could help to identify the stage of their nesting cycle. We did not disturb breeding birds except to protect their nests by placing aluminium collars around the trunk of the nest tree and nearby trees to prevent rats from reaching nests. In a few cases, however, the contents of nests close to the ground could be examined with a mirror attached to a long pole, or by climbing an adjacent tree. No attempt was made to climb nest trees, or to band nestlings, for fear of causing desertions. This meant that some of our observations @articularlyof the number of chicks present) are incomplete, and so figures given are minimum numbers of successful nests or young fledged. By 1996, there were 38 breeding pairs and we were unable to keep track of about a third of their nesting attempts, and so these were excluded from analysis of breeding success. Most nests were visited weekly during our rat poisoning rounds, but some nests were visited almost daily, while some remote nests were visited fortnightly or even less frequently. Nest construction, incubation spells, and feeding visits were timed at a few nests, especially during the early years when there were few nests to follow Unless otherwise stated, we give mean f standard deviation and range of measurements. RESULTS Social structure Typically, adult Kakerori remained in pairs and defended their territory all year. We noted four exceptions to this pattern, all involving additional birds helping to feed chicks or a change in partners. Two pairs had helpers at their nests; in one territory a male helper stayed for at least three successive years (from yearling to 3 years old), and in the other a male (yearling) and a female (2-year-old) helped to defend the territory and feed nestlings.
Recommended publications
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Tackling Indian Mynas
    The Myna Problem = a Major Issue Bill Handke OAM Canberra Indian Myna Action Group Inc Julian Robinson Indian (Common) Myna Sturnus tristis • Native to Indian sub-continent – distinctive colouring and call – aggressive / territorial • but roost communally – opportunistic feeder : omnivorous – long lived – breeds Oct – March • up to 3 clutches of 6-8 chicks ❖ adaptive, intelligent, highly invasive • Not to be confused with the Noisy Miner – native – nectar feeder – protective of food source – becoming more common in Canberra urban fringe – can cause some environmental problems (just like the Bell Miner) The Myna Invasion • Introduced Melbourne 1862 – to control locusts in market gardens • Taken to Sydney in early 1880s • Taken to Qld canefields (1883) – to control cane beetle • same as for cane toad • Introduced Canberra in 1968 – 250 per km2 • Now across eastern seaboard – densities ↑ 750-1250 km2 Testimonials • Among 100 most invasive species worldwide – (IUCN 2000) • Voted most hated pest in Aust – ABC Wild Watch Quest for Pests 2005 • beat cane toad, feral cat and fox • Most Extreme Threat Category – Bureau Rural Science / Dept Environment & Water • “You can have native birds or Indian Mynas — but not both” Mat & Cathy Gilfedder – Ian Fraser, local naturalist & 2006 Winner Aust Natural History Medallion The International Experience • Mynas have lead to the demise / decline of: – Mangaia Kingfisher (Cook Is) – Red-moustached Fruit Dove (French Polynesia) – Seychelles Magpie Robin (Seychelles) – Echo Parakeet (Mauritius) – Tui, NZ Pigeon
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Systematic Notes on Some Old World Passerines
    Kiv. ital. Orn., Milano, 59 (3-4): 183-195, 15-XII-1989 STOBRS L. OLSON PRELIMINARY SYSTEMATIC NOTES ON SOME OLD WORLD PASSERINES TIPOGKAFIA FUSI - PAVIA 1989 Riv. ital. Ora., Milano, 59 (3-4): 183-195, 15-XII-1989 STORRS L. OLSON (*) PRELIMINARY SYSTEMATIC NOTES ON SOME OLD WORLD PASSERINES Abstract. — The relationships of various genera of Old World passerines are assessed based on osteological characters of the nostril and on morphology of the syrinx. Chloropsis belongs in the Pycnonotidae. Nicator is not a bulbul and is returned to the Malaconotidae. Neolestes is probably not a bulbul. The Malagasy species placed in the genus Phyllastrephus are not bulbuls and are returned to the Timaliidae. It is confirmed that the relationships of Paramythia, Oreocharis, Malia, Tylas, Hyper - gerus, Apalopteron, and Lioptilornis (Kupeornis) are not with the Pycnonotidae. Trochocercus nitens and T. cycmomelas are monarchine flycatchers referable to the genus TerpsiphoTie. « Trochocercus s> nigromitratus, « T. s> albiventer, and « T. » albo- notatus are tentatively referred to Elminia. Neither Elminia nor Erythrocercus are monarch] nes and must be removed from the Myiagridae (Monarchidae auct.). Grai- lina and Aegithina- are monarch flycatchers referable to the Myiagridae. Eurocephalus belongs in the Laniinae, not the Prionopinae. Myioparus plumbeus is confirmed as belonging in the Muscicapidae. Pinarornis lacks the turdine condition of the syrinx. It appears to be most closely related to Neoeossypha, Stizorhina, and Modulatrix, and these four genera are placed along with Myadestes in a subfamily Myadestinae that is the primitive sister-group of the remainder of the Muscicapidae, all of which have a derived morphology of the syrinx.
    [Show full text]
  • Island Monarch Monarcha Cinerascens on Ashmore Reef: First Records for Australian Territory
    150 AUSTRALIAN FIELD ORNITHOLOGY 2011, 28, 150–161 Island Monarch Monarcha cinerascens on Ashmore Reef: First Records for Australian Territory MIKE CARTER1, ROHAN H. CLARKE2 and GEORGE SWANN3 130 Canadian Bay Road, Mt Eliza, Victoria 3930 (Email: [email protected]) 2School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800 3Kimberley Birdwatching, P.O. Box 220, Broome, Western Australia 6725 Summary Island Monarchs Monarcha cinerascens were observed at Ashmore Reef during the months of October and/or November in 2004, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010. In 2010 up to four were present together, and we consider that more than six individuals visited the Reef that year. Only single birds were observed on previous occasions. Thus the total number of Island Monarchs that has been detected on the Reef is at least eight and probably greater than ten. Reports of the 2004, 2007, 2008 and 2009 observations were assessed and accepted by the Birds Australia Rarities Committee (Case nos 467, 544, 581 and 701, respectively), with the 2004 observation being the first record for Australian territory. This paper documents all known occurrences on Ashmore Reef. We postulate that these occurrences are examples of dispersal of birds seeking suitable habitat beyond their usual range in the islands of the Indonesian archipelago just to the north. Introduction Ashmore Reef is an External Australian Territory located in Commonwealth waters within the Australian Economic Exclusion Zone. In 1983 it was declared a National Nature Reserve by the Australian Nature Conservation Agency, and continues to be administered by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population & Communities as a National Nature Reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • CLASSIDCATION of SOME BIRD COMMUNITIES in CHIANG Mal PROVINCE, NORTHERN THAILAND
    NAT. HIST. BULL. SIAM Soc. 33(2) : 121-138, 1985. CLASSIDCATION OF SOME BIRD COMMUNITIES IN CHIANG MAl PROVINCE, NORTHERN THAILAND Ookeow Prakobvitayakit Beaver* and Narlt Srltasuwan* ABSTRACT This study examines the bird commuirities of the mountain areas in Chiang Mai Province, northern Thailand, using presence-absence distribution data. The richest community (143 species) was found in submontane evergreen broad­ leaved forest on Doi Inthanon at 1600 m. The summit area (2590 m) supported fewer species than did areas of drier, lower elevation forest on Doi Pui-Suthep, from 300 to 1685 m. It is suggested that bird species diversity could be interpreted primarily in terms of vegetational complexity. Limited habitat disturbance may enhance diversity through creating artificial edge habitats and clearings. INTRODUCTION Thai ornithologists have only in recent years paid attention to the ecological aspects of avifaunas. Logging, burning, and shifting cultivation not only cause the ecological problems of erosion and rapid water runoff but also are endangering many native species of the flora and fauna through destruction of their natural habitats. Chiang Mai is one of the best areas in Thailand for bird watching but it is also one of the areas experiencing most serious modification by man. An under­ standing the distribution of birds in various environmental situations may lead to better methods of park or habitat management. In this paper we. describe the structure of several habitat types and report on the distribution of birds in them. The following questions are also considered: 1. How much variation exists and what factors control species richness in the selected study are~? 2.
    [Show full text]
  • MORPHOLOGICAL and ECOLOGICAL EVOLUTION in OLD and NEW WORLD FLYCATCHERS a Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the College O
    MORPHOLOGICAL AND ECOLOGICAL EVOLUTION IN OLD AND NEW WORLD FLYCATCHERS A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Clay E. Corbin August 2002 This dissertation entitled MORPHOLOGICAL AND ECOLOGICAL EVOLUTION IN OLD AND NEW WORLD FLYCATCHERS BY CLAY E. CORBIN has been approved for the Department of Biological Sciences and the College of Arts and Sciences by Donald B. Miles Associate Professor, Department of Biological Sciences Leslie A. Flemming Dean, College of Arts and Sciences CORBIN, C. E. Ph.D. August 2002. Biological Sciences. Morphological and Ecological Evolution in Old and New World Flycatchers (215pp.) Director of Dissertation: Donald B. Miles In both the Old and New Worlds, independent clades of sit-and-wait insectivorous birds have evolved. These independent radiations provide an excellent opportunity to test for convergent relationships between morphology and ecology at different ecological and phylogenetic levels. First, I test whether there is a significant adaptive relationship between ecology and morphology in North American and Southern African flycatcher communities. Second, using morphological traits and observations on foraging behavior, I test whether ecomorphological relationships are dependent upon locality. Third, using multivariate discrimination and cluster analysis on a morphological data set of five flycatcher clades, I address whether there is broad scale ecomorphological convergence among flycatcher clades and if morphology predicts a course measure of habitat preference. Finally, I test whether there is a common morphological axis of diversification and whether relative age of origin corresponds to the morphological variation exhibited by elaenia and tody-tyrant lineages.
    [Show full text]
  • Translocation of Rarotonga Monarchs Pomarea Dimidiata Within the Southern Cook Islands
    Bird Conservation International (2006) 16:197–215. ß BirdLife International 2006 doi: 10.1017/S0959270906000268 Printed in the United Kingdom Translocation of Rarotonga Monarchs Pomarea dimidiata within the southern Cook Islands HUGH A. ROBERTSON, IAN KARIKA and EDWARD K. SAUL Summary The translocation of species to a new site plays an important role in the conservation of many threatened birds; however, the problems and processes involved in planning and implementing such translocations are rarely reported. In order to establish a second secure ‘insurance’ population of the endangered Rarotonga Monarch Pomarea dimidiata, or Kakerori, 30 young birds were moved from the Takitumu Conservation Area on Rarotonga to the 2,700 ha island of Atiu between 2001 and 2003. The translocation of this single-island endemic was to a site outside the historical range of the species, because the small, but rapidly growing, population on Rarotonga was considered to be highly vulnerable to a catastrophe, such as a cyclone, or the arrival of a new bird disease or predator. The translocation followed consultation with local communities, an assessment of the suitability of islands in the southern Cook Islands, and an assessment of the disease risk posed by the translocation. The translocation appears to have been successful because Rarotonga Monarchs have bred well in a variety of forest habitats on Atiu. Introduction In a review of bird conservation problems in the South Pacific, commissioned by the South Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) and the International Council for Bird Preservation (now BirdLife International) in the early 1980s, Hay (1986) identified the Rarotonga Monarch, or Kakerori, Pomarea dimidiata, as one of the species most urgently in need of conservation management.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article Birds of Rawanwadi Region Bhandara, Central India
    Volume 5, No 2/2018 ISSN 2313-0008 (Print); ISSN 2313-0016 (Online) Research Article Malays. j. med. biol. res. Birds of Rawanwadi Region Bhandara, Central India Kishor G. Patil1, Deeksha Dabrase2, Virendra A. Shende3* 1,2Department of Zoology, Institute of Science, R. T. Road, Nagpur (M.S.), INDIA 3K. Z. S. Science College, Bramhani-Kalmeshwar, Dist- Nagpur (M.S.), INDIA *Email for Correspondence: [email protected] ABSTRACT The region of Rawanwadi reservoir is a good habitat for insects, fishes, reptiles as well as birds. Its geographical location is 21.043197 N, 79.729924 E. Observations were done by two visits on every month from May 2015 to April 2016 in the morning and evening hours. Bird observation and recording were done with the help of binocular and digital cameras. Total 143 species of birds were recorded belonging to 15 orders and 41 families. Out of total 143 species 07 are migrant, 95 are Resident and 41 are Resident migrant. Seasonal variation is well marked in birds due to availability of food and nesting and suitable environmental conditions. Largest number (60) of bird species is recorded from order Passeriformes which belonging to 17 families. Key words: Rawanwadi reservoir, Biodiversity, Birds 10/13/2018 Source of Support: None, No Conflict of Interest: Declared This article is is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon work non-commercially, and although the new works must also acknowledge and be non-commercial. INTRODUCTION Birds are described as a ‘Feathered Biped’.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding System Evolution Influenced the Geographic
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/evo.12695 Breeding system evolution influenced the geographic expansion and diversification of the core Corvoidea (Aves: Passeriformes) Petter Z. Marki,1,2,3,∗ Pierre-Henri Fabre,1,4 Knud A. Jønsson,1,5,6 Carsten Rahbek,1,5 Jon Fjeldsa,˚ 1 and Jonathan D. Kennedy1,∗ 1Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark 2Department of Environmental and Health Studies, Telemark University College, Hallvard Eikas Plass, N-3800 Bø, Norway 3E-mail: [email protected] 4Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 5Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, West Berkshire, SL5 7PY, United Kingdom 6Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom Received July 9, 2014 Accepted May 20, 2015 Birds vary greatly in their life-history strategies, including their breeding systems, which range from brood parasitism to a system with multiple nonbreeding helpers at the nest. By far the most common arrangement, however, is where both parents participate in raising the young. The traits associated with parental care have been suggested to affect dispersal propensity and lineage diversification, but to date tests of this potential relationship at broad temporal and spatial scales have been limited. Here, using data from a globally distributed group of corvoid birds in concordance with state-dependent speciation and extinction models, we suggest that pair breeding is associated with elevated speciation rates. Estimates of transition between breeding systems imply that cooperative lineages frequently evolve biparental care, whereas pair breeders rarely become cooperative.
    [Show full text]
  • The Threatened and Near-Threatened Birds of Luzon, Philippines, and the Role of the Sierra Madre Mountains in Their Conservation
    Bird Conservation International (1995) 5:79-115 The threatened and near-threatened birds of Luzon, Philippines, and the role of the Sierra Madre mountains in their conservation MICHAEL K0IE POULSEN Summary Fieldwork on the distribution, status and ecology of birds was conducted in the northern Sierra Madre mountain range, Luzon, Philippines, during March-May 1991 and March- May 1992. The findings show the area to be one of the most important for conservation of threatened species of birds in all Asia. The results are here combined with evidence from earlier surveys by other searchers. Fourteen threatened and 18 near-threatened species are now known from the area. This paper reports on all the threatened and near-threatened resident species of the island of Luzon, with special emphasis on their occurrence in the Sierra Madre mountains. In addition, the paper treats species with very limited global distribution that breed in Luzon, and lists species of forest birds endemic to the Philippines that have not previously been reported from the Sierra Madre mountains. Maps show the known sites for 17 species of special concern for conservation. New data on the altitudinal distribution of threatened and near-threatened species sug- gest that it is essential to protect primary forest at all elevations. Introduction No other Asian island has as many threatened species of bird as Luzon, closely followed by Mindanao, both in the Philippines. A total of 42 species listed as threatened or near-threatened by Collar and Andrew (1988) are known from Luzon including 15 breeding species listed as threatened. The vast majority of species of special concern to conservation (threatened, near- threatened and restricted-range) depend on forested habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Catastrophic Decline and Subsequent Conservation Management of The
    Bird Conservation International (2019) 29:598–615. © BirdLife International, 2019 doi:10.1017/S095927091900008X Catastrophic decline and subsequent conservation management of the Critically Endangered Fatu Hiva Monarch Pomarea whitneyi in the Marquesas Islands (French Polynesia) THOMAS GHESTEMME , ARTHUR MATOHI, CAROLINE BLANVILLAIN , EMMANUELLE PORTIER, MADEN LE BARH and MARK O’BRIEN Summary This paper documents the catastrophic decline of the ‘Critically Endangered’ Fatu Hiva Monarch Pomarea whitneyi since 2000 and presents population dynamics and conservation actions for the species between 2008 and 2017. The Fatu Hiva Monarch conservation programme has prevented the extinction of the species thus far. However, after an initial increase in the population size within the management area between 2008 and 2012, recruitment subsequently declined. Improvements in the method of trapping to control cats in 2016 and 2017 coincided with encour- aging results in terms of juvenile monarch survival rates, although two adult birds disappeared during the same period. The initial hypothesis, that the population would recover once the main threat, black (or ship) rat Rates Rattus predation, was effectively controlled in the breeding ter- ritories, has not proved to be correct. An alternative hypothesis assumes that cat predation, mainly on young birds, is limiting monarch recovery. Control of feral cats has been undertaken since 2010, but the implementation of a new trapping method (leg-hold traps) combined with a signifi- cant increase in cat trapping effort, has coincided with an increase in the number of cats culled, as well as monarch post-fledging survival in 2016 and 2017. For the first time in the project, no mortality has been observed for monarch chicks, fledged juveniles or immature birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Avifauna of Thrissur District, Kerala, India
    CATALOGUE ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 20(2): 1774-1783 AVIFAUNA OF THRISSUR DISTRICT, KERALA, INDIA E.A. Jayson 1 and C. Sivaperuman 2 Division of Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation, Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, Thrissur, Kerala 680653, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 2 [email protected] ABSTRACT is situated in the central region and is in the western slope of Three hundred and thirteen taxa of birds belonging to 64 the southern Western Ghats (Figure 1). The extent of the area Families were recorded in the Thrissur district, Kerala during is 1,041km2. The forests of Thrissur district fall within three a study on the avifauna there carried out from 1992 to 2002. 219 species of these were residents, 68 were trans- administrative divisions of the Kerala Forest and Wildlife continental migrants, 26 were local migrants and one species Department, viz. Thrissur, Chalakkudi and Vazhachal. Two was a straggler. The Order Passeriformes was highest in wildlife sanctuaries, namely the Peechi-Vazhani and the dominance followed by Charadriiformes, Ciconiiformes, Chimmony and a Ramsar site, the Vembanad-Kole wetlands Falconiformes, Coraciiformes and Piciformes. Seven exist in the district. species endemic to the Western Ghats and 11 species having threatened status were recorded. Out of the 1,340 species of birds recorded from the Indian subcontinent, Topographically, the area is divisible into the Machad Mala 23% were found in Thrissur district. This is the first attempt Ridge, the Vellani Mala Ridge, the low-lying foothills of the to compile district-wise distribution of avifauna in Kerala, Machad Mala Ridge, the Vellani Mala Ridge, the Anaikkal- which will pave way for a Bird Atlas of Kerala.
    [Show full text]