SPRING AUCTION 2021 Welcome to Our Spring Auction
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Biological Surveys at Hunsbury Hill Country Park 2018
FRIENDS OF WEST HUNSBURY PARKS BIOLOGICAL SURVEYS AT HUNSBURY HILL COUNTRY PARK 2018 Ryan Clark Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre April 2019 Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre Introduction Biological records tell us which species are present on sites and are essential in informing the conservation and management of wildlife. In 2018, the Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre ran a number of events to encourage biological recording at Hunsbury Hill Fort as part of the Friends of West Hunsbury Park’s project, which is supported by the National Lottery Heritage Fund. Hunsbury Hill Country Park is designated as a Local Wildlife Site (LWS). There are approximately 700 Local Wildlife Sites in Northamptonshire. Local Wildlife Sites create a network of areas, which are important as refuges for wildlife or wildlife corridors. Hunsbury Hill Country Park was designated as a LWS in 1992 for its woodland flora and the variety of habitats that the site possesses. The site also has a Local Geological Site (LGS) which highlights the importance of this site for its geology as well as biodiversity. This will be surveyed by the local geological group in due course. Hunsbury Hill Country Park Local Wildlife Site Boundary 1 Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre (NBRC) supports the recording, curation and sharing of quality verified environmental information for sound decision-making. We hold nearly a million biological records covering a variety of different species groups. Before the start of this project, we looked to see which species had been recorded at the site. We were surprised to find that the only records we have for the site have come from Local Wildlife Site Surveys, which assess the quality of the site and focus on vascular plants, with some casual observations of other species noted too. -
Harper's Island Wetlands Butterflies & Moths (2020)
Introduction Harper’s Island Wetlands (HIW) nature reserve, situated close to the village of Glounthaune on the north shore of Cork Harbour is well known for its birds, many of which come from all over northern Europe and beyond, but there is a lot more to the wildlife at the HWI nature reserve than birds. One of our goals it to find out as much as we can about all aspects of life, both plant and animal, that live or visit HIW. This is a report on the butterflies and moths of HIW. Butterflies After birds, butterflies are probably the one of the best known flying creatures. While there has been no structured study of them on at HIW, 17 of Ireland’s 33 resident and regular migrant species of Irish butterflies have been recorded. Just this summer we added the Comma butterfly to the island list. A species spreading across Ireland in recent years possibly in response to climate change. Hopefully we can set up regular monitoring of the butterflies at HIW in the next couple of years. Butterfly Species Recorded at Harper’s Island Wetlands up to September 2020. Colias croceus Clouded Yellow Pieris brassicae Large White Pieris rapae Small White Pieris napi Green-veined White Anthocharis cardamines Orange-tip Lycaena phlaeas Small Copper Polyommatus icarus Common Blue Celastrina argiolus Holly Blue Vanessa atalanta Red Admiral Vanessa cardui Painted Lady Aglais io Peacock Aglais urticae Small Tortoiseshell Polygonia c-album Comma Speyeria aglaja Dark-green Fritillary Pararge aegeria Speckled Wood Maniola jurtina Meadow Brown Aphantopus hyperantus Ringlet Moths One group of insects that are rarely seen by visitors to HIW is the moths. -
Increased Cave Use by Butterflies and Moths
International Journal of Speleology 50 (1) 15-24 Tampa, FL (USA) January 2021 Available online at scholarcommons.usf.edu/ijs International Journal of Speleology Off icial Journal of Union Internationale de Spéléologie Increased cave use by butterflies and moths: a response to climate warming? Otto Moog 1, Erhard Christian 2*, and Rudolf Eis3 1Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor Mendel 33 Str., 1180 Vienna, Austria 2 Institute of Zoology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor Mendel 33 Str., 1180 Vienna, Austria 3Waldegg 9a, 2754 Waldegg, Austria Abstract: Between 2015 and 2019, the list of Lepidoptera from “cave” habitats (i.e., proper caves, rock shelters and artificial subterranean structures) in Austria grew from 17 to 62 species, although the effort of data collection remained nearly constant from the late 1970s onwards. The newly recorded moths and butterflies were resting in caves during daytime in the the warm season, three species were also overwintering there. We observed Catocala elocata at 28 cave inspections, followed by Mormo maura (18), Catocala nupta (7), Peribatodes rhomboidaria, and Euplagia quadripunctaria (6). More than half of the species have been repeatedly observed in caves in Austria or abroad, so their relationship with such sites is apparently not completely random. Since the increase of records in Austria coincided with a considerable rise in the annual number of hot days (maximum temperatures ≥30°C) from 2015 onwards, we interpret the growing inclination of certain Lepidoptera towards daytime sheltering in caves as a behavioral reaction to climate warming. Keywords: Lepidoptera, cave use, diurnal retreat, refuge-site preference, climate change Received 22 October 2020; Revised 26 December 2020; Accepted 29 December 2020 Citation: Moog O., Christian E. -
Toby Austin's Garden Moth List
Toby Austin’s Garden Moth List Orange Swift Triodia sylvina Common Swift Korscheltellus lupulinus Ghost Moth Hepialus humuli Nematopogon swammerdamella Cork Moth Nemapogon cloacella Tinea trinotella Horse-chestnut Leaf-miner Cameraria ohridella Bird-cherry Ermine Yponomeuta evonymella Orchard/Apple/Spindle Ermine Yponomeuta padella/malinellus/cagnagella Willow Ermine Yponomeuta rorrella Yponomeuta plumbella Ypsolopha ustella Diamond-back Moth Plutella xylostella Plutella porrectella Ash Bud Moth Prays fraxinella Hawthorn Moth Scythropia crataegella Oegoconia quadripuncta/caradjai/deauratella Crassa unitella Carcina quercana Luquetia lobella Agonopterix alstromeriana Mompha sturnipennella Blastobasis adustella Blastobasis lacticolella Twenty-plume Moth Alucita hexadactyla Beautiful Plume Amblyptilia acanthadactyla Stenoptilia pterodactyla Stenoptilia bipunctidactyla Common Plume Emmelina monodactyla Variegated Golden Tortrix Archips xylosteana Argyrotaenia ljungiana Chequered Fruit-tree Tortrix Pandemis corylana Dark Fruit-tree Tortrix Pandemis heparana Pandemis dumetana Syndemis musculana Lozotaenia forsterana Carnation Tortrix Cacoecimorpha pronubana Light Brown Apple Moth Epiphyas postvittana Lozotaeniodes formosana Summer Fruit Tortrix Adoxophyes orana Flax Tortrix Cnephasia asseclana Green Oak Tortrix Tortrix viridana Cochylis molliculana Cochylis atricapitana Acleris holmiana Acleris forsskaleana Acleris comariana/laterana Acleris cristana Garden Rose Tortrix Acleris variegana Pseudargyrotoza conwagana Phtheochroa rugosana Agapeta -
FSC Nettlecombe Court Nature Review 2014
FSC Nettlecombe Court Nature Review 2014 Compiled by: Sam Tuddenham Nettlecombe Court- Nature Review 2014 Introduction The purpose of this report is to review and share the number of different species that are present in the grounds of Nettlecombe Court. A significant proportion of this data has been generated by FSC course tutors and course attendees studying at Nettlecombe court on a variety of courses. Some of the data has been collected for the primary purpose of species monitoring for nationwide conservation charities e.g. The Big Butterfly Count and Bee Walk Survey Scheme. Other species have just been noted by members or staff when out in the grounds. These records are as accurate as possible however we accept that there may be species missing. Nettlecombe Court Nettlecombe Court Field Centre of the Field Studies Council sits just inside the eastern border of Exmoor national park, North-West of Taunton (Map 1). The house grid reference is 51o07’52.23”N, 32o05’8.65”W and this report only documents wildlife within the grounds of the house (see Map 2). The estate is around 60 hectares and there is a large variety of environment types: Dry semi- improved neutral grassland, bare ground, woodland (large, small, man –made and natural), bracken dominated hills, ornamental shrubs (lawns/ domestic gardens) and streams. These will all provide different habitats, enabling the rich diversity of wildlife found at Nettlecombe Court. Nettlecombe court has possessed a meteorological station for a number of years and so a summary of “MET” data has been included in this report. -
Butterfly Conservation Event Can Be Seen by Clicking Here
Upper Thames Branch Moth Sightings Archive - January to June 2007 On Friday 29th June Dave Wilton carried out his transect in Finemere Wood and in the evening ran his overnight moth trap in his Westcott garden: "Moths seen in Finemere Wood were Narrow-bordered Five-spot Burnet (3), Clouded Border (2), Marbled White Spot (1) and Silver Y (1). My garden Robinson trap produced my first reasonable catch for a week or two, with more than 400 moths from about 80 species ending up in the trap. Best of the bunch were Lappet and Scarce Silver-lines, with Scarce Footman, Clay, Smoky Wainscot, Olive, Pleuroptya ruralis/Mother of Pearl and Phycitodes binaevella also new for my garden year list. The following evening a Blackneck came to our kitchen window light." Phycitodes binaevella Scarce Silver-lines Blackneck Photo © Dave Wilton Photo © Dave Wilton Photo © Dave Wilton ~ Thursday 28th June 2007 ~ Dave Wilton sent this moth report on 27th June: "On 26th June I was foolish enough to run my actinic trap at Westcott even though the temperature fell to 8 degrees Celsius overnight. The result was a pitiful catch of 64 moths from 17 species. Compare that to the same day last year when I got 800 moths in the Robinson! The poor weather of the past few days seems to have had a drastic effect on catches all across the country although last night did produce one new species for me, the Short-cloaked Moth. Looking on the bright side, thanks to Peter Hall and his microscope I do now have a few additions to the UTB list from back in April: Dichrorampha acuminatana, Elachista canapennella, Dipleurina lacustrata, Eudonia truncicolella and Parornix anglicella were all trapped in my garden, Rhopobota stagnana (B&F 1161, formerly Griselda stagnana) was found in the disused railway cutting west of Westcott Airfield and Pammene argyrana was caught in Rushbeds Wood." Also, while doing a butterfly transect in Finemere Wood on 20th June, Dave kicked up a Crambus perlella from the grass. -
MOTH CHECKLIST Species Listed Are Those Recorded on the Wetland to Date
Version 4.0 Nov 2015 Map Ref: SO 95086 46541 MOTH CHECKLIST Species listed are those recorded on the Wetland to date. Vernacular Name Scientific Name New Code B&F No. MACRO MOTHS 3.005 14 Ghost Moth Hepialus humulae 3.001 15 Orange Swift Hepialus sylvina 3.002 17 Common Swift Hepialus lupulinus 50.002 161 Leopard Moth Zeuzera pyrina 54.008 169 Six-spot Burnet Zygaeba filipendulae 66.007 1637 Oak Eggar Lasiocampa quercus 66.010 1640 The Drinker Euthrix potatoria 68.001 1643 Emperor Moth Saturnia pavonia 65.002 1646 Oak Hook-tip Drepana binaria 65.005 1648 Pebble Hook-tip Drepana falcataria 65.007 1651 Chinese Character Cilix glaucata 65.009 1653 Buff Arches Habrosyne pyritoides 65.010 1654 Figure of Eighty Tethia ocularis 65.015 1660 Frosted Green Polyploca ridens 70.305 1669 Common Emerald Hermithea aestivaria 70.302 1673 Small Emerald Hemistola chrysoprasaria 70.029 1682 Blood-vein Timandra comae 70.024 1690 Small Blood-vein Scopula imitaria 70.013 1702 Small Fan-footed Wave Idaea biselata 70.011 1708 Single-dotted Wave Idaea dimidiata 70.016 1713 Riband Wave Idaea aversata 70.053 1722 Flame Carpet Xanthorhoe designata 70.051 1724 Red Twin-spot Carpet Xanthorhoe spadicearia 70.049 1728 Garden Carpet Xanthorhoe fluctuata 70.061 1738 Common Carpet Epirrhoe alternata 70.059 1742 Yellow Shell Camptogramma bilineata 70.087 1752 Purple Bar Cosmorhoe ocellata 70.093 1758 Barred Straw Eulithis (Gandaritis) pyraliata 70.097 1764 Common Marbled Carpet Chloroclysta truncata 70.085 1765 Barred Yellow Cidaria fulvata 70.100 1776 Green Carpet Colostygia pectinataria 70.126 1781 Small Waved Umber Horisme vitalbata 70.107 1795 November/Autumnal Moth agg Epirrita dilutata agg. -
Fossil Calibrations for the Arthropod Tree of Life
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/044859; this version posted June 10, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. FOSSIL CALIBRATIONS FOR THE ARTHROPOD TREE OF LIFE AUTHORS Joanna M. Wolfe1*, Allison C. Daley2,3, David A. Legg3, Gregory D. Edgecombe4 1 Department of Earth, Atmospheric & Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 2 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK 3 Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PZ, UK 4 Department of Earth Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Fossil age data and molecular sequences are increasingly combined to establish a timescale for the Tree of Life. Arthropods, as the most species-rich and morphologically disparate animal phylum, have received substantial attention, particularly with regard to questions such as the timing of habitat shifts (e.g. terrestrialisation), genome evolution (e.g. gene family duplication and functional evolution), origins of novel characters and behaviours (e.g. wings and flight, venom, silk), biogeography, rate of diversification (e.g. Cambrian explosion, insect coevolution with angiosperms, evolution of crab body plans), and the evolution of arthropod microbiomes. We present herein a series of rigorously vetted calibration fossils for arthropod evolutionary history, taking into account recently published guidelines for best practice in fossil calibration. -
Butterfly Monitoring Scheme
BUTTERFLY MONITORING SCHEME Report to recorders 2002 The Butterfly Monitoring Scheme Report to Recorders 2002 J NICK GREATOREX-DAVIES & DAVID B ROY CEH Monks Wood Abbots Ripton Huntingdon Cambs PE28 2LS June 2003 CONTENTS Page Summary 1 INTRODUCTION Origins, organisation and aims of the BMS 3 Sites from which the BMS receives data 3 Sites lost and gained from the BMS in 2002 4 UPDATES ON THE CONTINUED DEVELOPMENT OF NEW FEATURES OF THE BMS Method of calculating annual indices 5 Partnership agreement and collaboration with Butterfly Conservation 5 Ongoing developments 6 Butterfly monitoring in Scotland 6 Recording habitat – Site Data Forms 7 Developing a system for recording habitat structure & management on butterfly transects 8 Transect Walker 8 BMS web site 8 SUMMARY OF THE 2001 SEASON The method of calculating collated indices 9 First and second generation indices 9 Review of changes in indices 9 Tabular summary of changes 2001 to 2002 12 Summary of the weather in 2001 / 2002 and some apparent effects on butterflies 14 SITES CONTRIBUTING DATA TO THE BMS The number of sites contributing data to the BMS in all years 15 The current UK distribution of BMS sites 16 ANALYSIS OF THE AMOUNT OF DATA RECEIVED Percentage of counts completed 17 The number of weeks recorded for each transect 19 Annual indices and the proportion that could be calculated 20 Number of annual indices for the scarcer species 23 ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN BUTTERFLY NUMBERS Numbers of butterflies recorded 25 Summary of changes at site level 2001 / 2002 27 Comparison of the 27 years of the BMS 29 WORKING IN PARTNERSHIP: THE VALUE OF ADDING DATA SUPPLIED BY BUTTERFLY CONSERVATION TO AN EXPANDED BUTTERFLY MONITORING SCHEME WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE ADONIS BLUE. -
Ec Ecolo Ogy a and D Evi Iden
Ecology and Evidence Winter newsletter 2017/18 DISCOVER wildlife, DATA gather, DELIVER cconservation Cover picture: Deptford pink Dianthus armeria, by Peter Atherall The Deptford pink has declined rapidly in range and is now known to inhabit only about 15 sites in the UK, mainly in the south. It prefers light, sandy, acidic soils, and requires open conditions to grow well. It can be found on disturbed ground, such as tracks and field edges, along hedgerows and in dry pasture. In Kent it is found on Kent Wildlife Trust’s Sandwich Bay National Nature Reserve and at Farnigham Woods. Kent Wildlife Trust Ecology and Evidence Winter newsletter 2017/18 Introduction community, visitor or educattional interest. For example at Welcome to the winter 2017/18 ecology and evidence our Queendown Warren reseerve in the Medway Smile newsletter, which this year is bigger than ever before. I Living Landscape, chalk grassland, woodland and early have taken the decision this year to encompass not only spider orchids have been identified as key nature Ecology Groups, but also to highlight the wealth of other conservation features. Each feature will have a number of work carried out by Kent Wildlife Trust and our volunteers attributes which are its charaacteristics, qualities or in the vital areas of monitoring and evidence. Evidence is properties. Attributes are the measurable performance absolutely critical to what we do, and it is increasingly indicators which together help to indicate the condition of important that we are able to demonstrate the efficacy of the feature. Examples might t be the size of an orchid colony, our management of Kent’s wildlife and habitats. -
A Guide to the Butterflies
A guide to the Butterflies of Chipstead Downs Introduction This guide to the butterflies of the Chipstead Downs site is intended only as a brief introduction to these winged jewels. The notes that accompany the photographs are necessarily brief and cannot take the place of the many field guides available. Should you wish to avail yourself of more information on the butterflies, it is recommended that you obtain a copy of the Collins “Butterfly Guide” by Tom Tolman & Richard Lewington, which gives far greater detail and describes each species with excellent colour paintings. The notes attached with each species describe: Distribution - this details where each species is commonly seen at the Chipstead Downs. Flight period - Whether the species has a single generation (univoltine), two generations (bivoltine) or many generations (multivoltine) and when they are usually in flight. The flight period of many species is gradually extending, due to global warming. Habitat - Describes the habitat where each species is usually seen. Food plant - this is the food plant of the caterpillar, not that of the adult. We hope that this guide will assist you in discovering the natural beauty of the Chipstead Downs and, perhaps, prompt you to increase your knowledge of the nature around you. WoodChip Conservation Volunteers, 2011. Large Skipper (Ochlodes venatus) Distribution: A widespread and common species over most of the site. Flight period: Univoltine. On the wing from June to the end of August. Habitat: Diverse, but favouring scrub, particularly bramble with tall grasses. Foodplant: Various coarse grasses. Small Skipper (Thymelicus sylvestris) Distribution: Widespread and very common over most of the site. -
Sensitivity of Upland Arthropod Diversity to Livestock Grazing
WFL Publisher Science and Technology Food, Agriculture & Environment Vol.1(2) : 301-307. 2003 www.world-food.net Sensitivity of upland arthropod diversity to livestock grazing, vegetation structure and landform Peter Dennis Macaulay Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, Scotland, UK. e-mail: [email protected] Received 13 January 2003, accepted 30 April 2003. Abstract Livestock production extends to most non-forested, marginal, upland habitats of Britain. Of these, indigenous grasslands are stocked predominantly by sheep, stocking densities having increased in Scotland by 25% between 1975 and 1990. Conversely, the national herd of cattle in Scotland declined by 22% over the same period. The effects of grazing management on arthropod distribution and abundance is reviewed, with particular emphasis on the results of grazing experiments that have investigated the effects on arthropods of varied livestock species and stocking rates. Arthropods contribute the most species of any taxa in the uplands and are critical in upland food chains. The direction and magnitude of the response of different arthropod taxa to grazing management reflects their trophic level, life history, size and mobility, e.g., 30 % of ground and rove beetle species are more sensitive to landform than grazing manage- ment. For the arthropod taxa that are sensitive to grazing management, the effects are generally indirect, via changes in the heterogeneity of botanical composition and vegetation structure. A mosaic of contrasting botanical composition and structural heterogeneity is essential to conserve and enhance arthropod and broader wildlife diversity in the uplands. However, the landscape-scale study of mammalian herbivore-vegetation-arthropod interactions is required both to quantify the relative importance of land use (grazing management) and landform (landscape physiognomy) across the uplands and to determine the optimal grain-size of the habitat mosaic to sustain biodiversity.