Great Speeches of the War

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Great Speeches of the War .', GREAT SPEECHES OF THE WAR LIBRARY LIBRARY SIR EDWARD GREY (MINISTER FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS) GREAT SPEECHES OF THE WAR PRINTED BY HAZELL, WATSON & VINEY, LD. LONDON AND AYLESBURY 1915 ^/ ..- > I LIBRAE , . PUBLISHERS' NOTE Here in this volume are gathered together all the most important speeches dealing with the War in all its aspects by Ministers, by Members of Parliament, and by Public men both of our own Country and of our Allies, France, Belgium, and Russia speeches which will in time become documents of the greatest historical interest. These speeches have with a few exceptions been revised and corrected for this volume by their authors. LIST OF SPEAKERS PAOB RT. HON. SIR EDWARD GREY ..... i JOHN REDMOND . ... 17 RT. HON. AUSTEN CHAMBERLAIN .... 19 RT. HON. H. H. ASQUITH ..... 25 EARL CURZON OF KEDLESTON ..... 33 RT. HON. A. BONAR LAW ..... 44 RT. HON. A. J. BALFOUR ...... 48 RT. HON. SIR JOHN SIMON ..... 54 EARL KITCHENER . 59 RT. HON. D. LLOYD GEORGE ..... 62 DR. CLIFFORD ........ 75 M. VIVIANI ........ 93 RT. HON. D. LLOYD GEORGE 95 RT. HON. WINSTON S. CHURCHILL .... 104 EARL OF ROSEBERY .,121 WILL CROOKS 130 HORATIO BOTTOMLEY . .135 RT. HON. H. H. ASQUITH 151 SIR WILLIAM ROBERTSON NICOLL .... 159 vii viii List of Speakers PAGE TOM RICHARDS 163 RT. HON. T. J. MACNAMARA 166 RT. HON. A. BONAR LAW 173 EARL OF ROSEBERY . .182 T. P. O'CONNOR . 187 . \ . JOHN REDMOND , 195 RT. HON. H. H. ASQUITH . .201 RT. HON. T. McKiNNON WOOD . 209 RT. HON. WINSTON S. CHURCHILL . * . 216 RT. HON. AUSTEN CHAMBERLAIN . 220 ARISTIDE BRIAND . M. 229 EARL CURZON OF KEDLESTON ..... 234 SIR EDWARD HOLDEN . 238 MARQUESS OF LANSDOWNE ... .. 248 ' . M. PAUL HYMANS . , -">" 258 M. SAZONOFF . 263 RT. HON. F. E. SMITH 268 RT. HON. SIR EDWARD GREY 271 RT. HON. LEWIS HARCOURT 275 RUDYARD KIPLING 279 RT. HON. WINSTON S. CHURCHILL .... 282 VISCOUNT HALDANE ... 292 PHILIP SNOWDEN . 299 PRINCE LICHNOWSKY 307 LIST OF PLATES SIR EDWARD GREY ..... Frontispiece FACING PAOB RT. HON. A. J. BALFOUR ...... 48 Rx. HON. SIR JOHN SIMON 54 EARL KITCHENER ....... 60 RT. HON. D. LLOYD GEORGE 74 M. REN VIVIANI 92 RT. HON. WINSTON S. CHURCHILL . 104 EARL OF ROSEBERY ....... 122 RT. HON. H. H. ASQUITH ..... 152 RT. HON. A. BONAR LAW ..... 174 EARL CURZON OF KEDLESTON ..... 234 VISCOUNT HALDANE . .292 SIR EDWARD GREY [Speech in the House of Commons August 4, 1914, in which he an- nounced the position and intentions of the Government with reference to the War. The Chamber presented a memorable spectacle, all the old party divisions were obliterated, parties felt and recognized that a great Assembly was taking high decisions in a noble manner.] MR. SPEAKER : Last week I stated that we were working for peace not only for this country, but to preserve the peace of Europe. To-day but events move so rapidly that it is exceedingly difficult to state with technical accuracy the actual state of affairs it is clear that the peace of Europe cannot be preserved. Russia and Germany, at any rate, have declared war upon each other. Before I proceed to state the position of his Majesty's Government and what our attitude is with regard to the present crisis, I would like to clear the ground that the House may know exactly under what obligations the Government is or the House can be said to be in coming to a decision upon the matter. First of all let me say very shortly that we have consistently worked with a single mind and with all the earnest- ness in our power to preserve the peace. [Cheers.] The House might be satisfied on that point. We have always done it, and in these last years, as far as his Majesty's Govern- ment are concerned we should have no difficulty in proving that we have done it. Through the Balkan crisis by general admission we worked for peace, and the co-operation of the Great Powers was successful in working for peace in that crisis. It is true that some Powers had great difficulty in adjusting their points of view and it took much time and labour and discussion before they could settle their differences, but peace was secured because peace was their main object and I 2 Sir Edward Grey they were willing to give time and trouble to the considera- tion of difficulties and not to accentuate the differences that arose. In the present crisis it has not been possible to secure the peace of Europe, because there has been little time and there has been a disposition, at any rate in some quarters, on which I will not dwell, to force things rapidly to an issue at any rate to the great risk of war and we know that the result of that is that the policy of peace, as far as the Great Powers generally are concerned, has failed. I do not want to dwell upon that and to comment upon it, or to say where blame seems to us to lie, and which Powers were most in favour of peace, or which were most disposed to risk or to endanger peace, because 1 would like the House to approach the crisis in which we are from the point of view of British interests, British honour [loud Opposition cheers], British obligations [renewed cheers], and free from all passion. We shall publish papers as soon as we can regarding what took place last week when we were working for peace, and when these papers are published I have no doubt that to every h.rnian being they will make it clear how strenuous and genuine and whole-hearted our own efforts for peace were, and they will enable people to form their own judgment upon what forces were at work which operated against peace. Now I come first to the question of British obligations. I have assured the House, and the Prime Minister has assured the House more than once, that if any crisis such as this arose we should come before the House of Commons and be able to say to the House that it was free to decide what the British attitude should be that would secret [cheers] ; we have no engagement [cheers] to spring upon the House and should not tell the House that because we had entered upon that engagement there was an obligation of honour on the country. I will deal with that point to clear the ground first. There havebeen inEuropetwo diplomatic groups the Triple Alliance, and what came to be called the Triple Entente for some years The Entente not an Alliance it a past. Triple was ; was diplomatic group. [Hear, hear.] The House will remember that in 1908 there was a crisis also a Balkan crisis which originated in the annexation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Russian Minister, M. Isvolsky, happened to come to London his visit had been planned before the crisis broke out and I told him definitely then that this being a Balkan affair I did Great Speeches of the War 8 not consider that public opinion in this country would justify us in promising him anything more than diplomatic support, and more was never asked from us, more was never given, and more was never promised. In this present crisis up till yesterday we had also given no promise of anything more than diplomatic support. [Minis- terial cheers from below the gangway.] Up till yesterday no promise of anything more than diplomatic support was given. To make this question of obligation clear to the House I must go back to the Morocco crisis of 1906. That was the time of the Algeciras Conference. It came at a very difficult time for his Majesty's Government, when a General Election was in progress. Ministers were scattered all over the country, and I was spending three days a week in my constituency and three days at the Foreign Office. I was asked a question whether if that crisis developed and there were war between France and Germany we would give armed support. I said then that I could promise nothing to any foreign Power unless it was subsequently to receive the whole-hearted support of public opinion here when the occasion arose. I said that in my opinion if a war were forced upon France then on the question of Morocco a question which had just been the sub- of this and France an ject agreement between country ; agree- ment exceedingly popular on both sides [hear, hear] if out of that agreement war were forced upon France at that time, in my opinion public opinion in this country would rally to the material support of France. [Cheers.] I expressed that opinion, but I gave no promise. I expressed that opinion throughout the crisis so far as I remember almost in the same words to the French Ambassador and the German Ambassador at that time. I made no promise and I used no threat. Well, Sir, that position was accepted by the French Govern- ment, but said to me at the time, I think very reasonably, " they If you think it possible that public opinion in Great Britain might when a sudden crisis arose justify you in giving to France the armed support which you cannot promise in advance, unless between military and naval experts some conversations have taken place you will not be able to give that support, even if you wish to give it, when the time comes." There was force in that. I agreed to it and authorized these conversations to take place, but on the distinct understanding that nothing which passed between military and naval experts should bind either Government or restrict in any way their 4 Sir Edward Grey freedom to come to a decision as to whether or not they would give their support when the time arose.
Recommended publications
  • Dumfries and Galloway Described by Macgibbon and Ross 1887–92: What Has Become of Them Since? by Janet Brennan-Inglis
    TRANSACTIONS of the DUMFRIESSHIRE AND GALLOWAY NATURAL HISTORY and ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY FOUNDED 20 NOVEMBER 1862 THIRD SERIES VOLUME 88 LXXXVIII Editors: ELAINE KENNEDY FRANCIS TOOLIS JAMES FOSTER ISSN 0141-12 2014 DUMFRIES Published by the Council of the Society Office-Bearers 2013–2014 and Fellows of the Society President Mr L. Murray Vice-Presidents Mrs C. Iglehart, Mr A. Pallister, Mrs P.G. Williams and Mr D. Rose Fellows of the Society Mr A.D. Anderson, Mr J.H.D. Gair, Dr J.B. Wilson, Mr K.H. Dobie, Mrs E. Toolis, Dr D.F. Devereux, Mrs M. Williams and Dr F. Toolis Mr L.J. Masters and Mr R.H. McEwen — appointed under Rule 10 Hon. Secretary Mr J.L. Williams, Merkland, Kirkmahoe, Dumfries DG1 1SY Hon. Membership Secretary Miss H. Barrington, 30 Noblehill Avenue, Dumfries DG1 3HR Hon. Treasurer Mr M. Cook, Gowanfoot, Robertland, Amisfield, Dumfries DG1 3PB Hon. Librarian Mr R. Coleman, 2 Loreburn Park, Dumfries DG1 1LS Hon. Institutional Subscriptions Secretary Mrs A. Weighill Hon. Editors Mrs E. Kennedy, Nether Carruchan, Troqueer, Dumfries DG2 8LY Dr F. Toolis, 25 Dalbeattie Road, Dumfries DG2 7PF Dr J. Foster (Webmaster), 21 Maxwell Street, Dumfries DG2 7AP Hon. Syllabus Conveners Mrs J. Brann, Troston, New Abbey, Dumfries DG2 8EF Miss S. Ratchford, Tadorna, Hollands Farm Road, Caerlaverock, Dumfries DG1 4RS Hon. Curators Mrs J. Turner and Miss S. Ratchford Hon. Outings Organiser Mrs S. Honey Ordinary Members Mr R. Copland, Dr Jeanette Brock, Dr Jeremy Brock, Mr D. Scott, Mr J. McKinnell, Mr A. Gair, Mr D. Dutton CONTENTS Herbarium of Matthew Jamieson by David Hawker ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • London Metropolitan Archives Dickinson
    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 DICKINSON, WILLOUGHBY HYETT F/DCK Reference Description Dates PERSONAL PAPERS COLLATED IN 1886 F/DCK/001/001 Plan of table for dinner given by Oxford Circuit 1886 Dec 01 to Rt Hon Henry Matthews QC F/DCK/001/002 Cover 'Own writings, 1886' noted by WHD before 1939 PERSONAL PAPERS COLLATED IN 1889 F/DCK/002/001 Speech on Sunday School Teaching 1889 Mar F/DCK/002/002 LCC Completion of Scheme of London 1889 Dec 31 Government: table prepared by WHD for Sub -Committee PERSONAL PAPERS COLLATED IN 1890 F/DCK/003/001 Speech on proposal to form a tunnel under the 1890 Mar 14 Thames at Blackwall F/DCK/003/002 Cover 'Own writings 1889, 1890' noted by WHD n.d. PERSONAL PAPERS COLLATED IN 1891 F/DCK/004/001 Sketch 'Suggestion for the arms of the LCC' by 1891 Apr J Williams Benn (not adopted) PERSONAL PAPERS COLLATED IN 1892 F/DCK/005/001 Letter to Lord Rosebery from WHD relating to 1892 Mar 31 his position as LCC deputy-chairman F/DCK/005/002 Minutes of Special Committee on WHD's 1892 Apr 01 position as LCC deputy chairman F/DCK/005/003 Cover 'Own writings, 1892' noted by WHD n.d. PERSONAL PAPERS COLLATED IN 1894 F/DCK/006/001 Speech by WHD on Unification of London, at 1894 Mar 13 LCC meeting F/DCK/006/002 Cover 'Own writings, 1894' noted by WHD n.d. PERSONAL PAPERS COLLATED IN 1895 LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 2 DICKINSON, WILLOUGHBY HYETT F/DCK Reference Description Dates F/DCK/007/001 LCC London Government: memorandum by 1895 Apr 22 Deputy Chairman on question of reform of Local Government F/DCK/007/002 LCC Short account of Spring Gardens and list 1895 Jul 05 of documents, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Before New Liberalism: the Continuity of Radical Dissent, 1867-1914
    Before New Liberalism: The Continuity of Radical Dissent, 1867-1914 A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2019 Nicholas A. Loizou School of Arts, Languages and Cultures Table of Contents: List of Figures 4 Abstract 6 Introduction 10 Research Objectives: A Revision in Politico-Religious History 10 A Historiographical Review 13 Methodology and Approach 23 1. Radical Dissent, Social Gospels and the Community, 1860-1906 28 1. Introduction 28 2. Growing Communitarianism and Religious Theology 29 3. The Importance of Radical Dissent and the Community 37 4. Nonconformity and the Urban Working Class 41 5. Nonconformity and the Liberal Party 51 6. Conclusion 56 2. Nonconformity, Liberalism and Labour 58 1. Introduction 58 2. The Significance of Nonconformity in Co-operative Class Relations 62 3. The Reform League 69 4. Nonconformity, Class and Christian Brotherhood in the Age of Gladstone 77 5. ‘That Church and King Mob’: Nonconformity, Brotherhood and Anti-Tory Rhetoric 82 6. Liberal-Labour Politics and the Late Nineteenth Century Social Turn in Nonconformity 87 7. Conclusion 93 3. Birmingham and the Civic Gospel: 1860-1886 94 1. Introduction 94 2. The Civic Gospel: The Origins of a Civic Theology 98 3. The Civic Gospel and the Cohesion of the Birmingham Corporation: 1860 – 1886 102 4. The Civic Gospel and Municipal Socialism: 1867-1886 111 5. The National Liberal Federation 116 6. The Radical Programme 122 7. Conclusion: The Legacy of Birmingham Progressivism 128 4. From Provincial Liberalism to National Politics: Nonconformist Movements 1860-1906 130 2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Lewis Harcourt's Journal of the 1914 War Crisis Edited and Introduced by John W. Young, University of Nottingham Lewis Harco
    Lewis Harcourt’s Journal of the 1914 War Crisis Edited and Introduced by John W. Young, University of Nottingham Lewis Harcourt (1863-1922), known as ‘Loulou’, was the son of the prominent Liberal politician, William Harcourt. The bond between them was particularly strong, possibly because Loulou’s mother died immediately after his birth, and after school at Eton he became secretary to his father, who held the positions of Home Secretary, Chancellor of the Exchequer and, in 1896-98, Leader of the Opposition. Although frequently involved intrigue, notably when Sir William tried to succeed Gladstone as premier in 1894, Loulou did not enter Parliament until 1904. Cooler-tempered, subtler and less domineering than his father, if also less driven and passionate, he spent most of his career in government, becoming First Commissioner of Works in 1905, promoted to the Cabinet in 1907 and, the following year, taking up the more significant post of Colonial Secretary, which he held until 1915.1 Despite his privileged background – one of his great-grandfathers was an Archbishop of York, another the First Earl of Clarendon, a Cabinet minister under George III – he followed his father in aligning with radical causes like the introduction of death duties, scepticism about Imperial expansion, support for Irish Home Rule and opposition to the Boer War. But his was a traditional form of radicalism that made him sceptical about women’s suffrage and Lloyd George’s ‘People’s Budget’ of 1909. Having criticised increased naval spending and, when these were disclosed in 1911, military talks with France, it was predictable that he would oppose involvement in European 1 For biographies see: Patrick Jackson, ‘Lewis Harcourt’, Journal of Liberal History, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Galley Pages 402-632
    doubt that the coldness and pessimism of our Foreign 39373 MolteiR) 402 3360w associations throughout the countqi. It was entirely on • the lines of Molteno's speeches. It began by recalling the programme of Peace, Retrenchment and Reform on which the great Liberal victory of 1906 had been won. Conciliation in South Africa, wrote Brunner, seemed to usher in a policy of friendliness and goodwill towards foreign countries, with improvements of international law and a general reduction of the burden of armaments. But since the naval panic of 1909 our Foreign Office and Admiralty had yielded to the clamour of the Jingo Press, Parliament had been misled, and no heed has been paid to the protests of the National Liberal Federation or to the constant criticisms of Liberal economists in Parliament and the Press. The invention and advertisement of the Dread- nought by our Admiralty have proved a curse to man-. kind, and not least to our own people and our German, neighbours; for both sorely need the money they have - wasted to remove slums, to improve housing in town and country, and to multiply gardens. If this destruc-.. five rivalry in naval armaments goes on unchecked, it threatens to submerge civilization and to destroy society. There is no limit to the taxation which arma- ments can impose On rich and poor alike, as we see by the case of Japan, which now has a high tariff and an, income tax rising to 55. in the in order to pay for a conscript army and a large fleet. Perhaps the central mischief is that diplomacy, by secret treaties and dubious understandings, has twisted and perverted the welcome friendship_with France into a dangerous entanglement which has spoiled our rela- tions with Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vision for London 1889–1914
    A VISION FOR LONDON 1889–1914 …WHAT WAS THE VISION BEHIND THE LCC? …AND THE REALITY? As the world’s largest municipal government, the early London County Council was a laboratory for social experimentation. It sought to master the problems of metropolitan amelioration, political economy and public culture. Pennybacker’s social history tests the vision of London Progressivism against its practitioners’ accomplishments. She suggests that the historical memory of the hopes vested in the LCC’s achievements and the disillusions spawned by failure are both major forces in today’s ambivalent response to metropolitan politics in London. Susan D.Pennybacker is Associate Professor of History at Trinity College in Hartford. She is also President of the Northeast Conference on British Studies and author of several essays on the social history of turn-of-the-century London. A VISION FOR LONDON 1889– 1914 labour, everyday life and the LCC experiment Susan D.Pennybacker London and New York First published 1995 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge's collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 © 1995 Susan D.Pennybacker All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (GALA) – the University of Greenwich Open Access Repository
    Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (GALA) – the University of Greenwich open access repository http://gala.gre.ac.uk __________________________________________________________________________________________ Citation: Weinbren, Daniel John (1990) The `Peace Arsenal' scheme: the campaign for non-munitions work at the Royal Ordnance Factories, Woolwich, after the First World War. PhD thesis, Thames Polytechnic. __________________________________________________________________________________________ Please note that the full text version provided on GALA is the final published version awarded by the university. “I certify that this work has not been accepted in substance for any degree, and is not concurrently being submitted for any degree other than that of (name of research degree) being studied at the University of Greenwich. I also declare that this work is the result of my own investigations except where otherwise identified by references and that I have not plagiarised the work of others”. Weinbren, Daniel John (1990) The `Peace Arsenal' scheme: the campaign for non-munitions work at the Royal Ordnance Factories, Woolwich, after the First World War. ##thesis _type## , ##institution## Available at: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/8710/ __________________________________________________________________________________________ Contact: [email protected] 1473338 The Peace Arsenal' scheme; the campaign for non-munitions work at the Royal Ordnance Factories, Woolwich after the First World War. Daniel John/Weinbren This doctoral thesis is submitted
    [Show full text]
  • British War Cabinets
    Michigan Law Review Volume 16 Issue 7 1918 British War Cabinets John A. Fairlie University of Illinois Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Military, War, and Peace Commons, and the President/Executive Department Commons Recommended Citation John A. Fairlie, British War Cabinets, 16 MICH. L. REV. 471 (1918). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol16/iss7/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW VOL. XVI. MAY, x918 No. 7. BRITISH WAR CABINETS. URING the progress of the present world war there has been D a remarkable series of developments in the British Cabinet and. ministry, involving not only many changes of personnel but also fundamental alterations in the constitution of the Cabinet and its relations to Parliament. An analysis of these is not only of interest as an important phase of the history of the war, and the evolution of political mstitutions ; but is also of value in dealing with problems and proposals for governmental reorganization in the United States. THE LIBERAL CABINET At the outbreak of the war a Liberal Cabinet was in office, with the Rt. Hon. Henry H. Asquith as Prime Minister. But the position of this Cabinet differed from that of the conventional description of British institutions, in that the Liberal party did not have a ma­ jority in the House of ·commons.
    [Show full text]
  • Enemy of Landlordism Berkley Farr James Wood East Down’S Liberal MP Mira Matikkala William Digby and the Indian Question J
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 58 / Spring 2008 / £6.00 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y Enemy of landlordism Berkley Farr James Wood East Down’s Liberal MP Mira Matikkala William Digby and the Indian Question J. Graham Jones Thomas Jones’s Lloyd George York Membery A statue for Lloyd George Report Liberals and local government in London since the 1970s Liberal Democrat History Group An LSE Archives / Liberal Democrat History Group / Richard Scurrah Wainwright Trust seminar TORRINgtON ’58: LIBERAL SURVIVAL AND REVIVAL, 1945–1979 10.30–16.45, Saturday 14 June 2008 London School of Economics, S75 St Clements Building, Houghton Street, London WC2 On 27 March 1958, Mark Bonham Carter, Asquith’s grandson, won the parliamentary by-election in the Devon seat of Torrington by a margin of just 219 votes. It was the first Liberal by-election gain since the 1920s. Although the seat was lost in the 1959 general election, it marked the beginning of the first major Liberal post-war revival, under the leadership of Jo Grimond. To mark the fiftieth anniversary of the Torrington by-election, the Archives of the London School of Economics, the Liberal Democrat History Group and the Richard Scurrah Wainwright Trust are holding a seminar to investigate the post-Second World War experience of the Liberal Party – from the defeats of the 1945 general election to the general election of 1979, when 13 Liberal MPs were elected. The keynote address will be given by Lord Dholakia and Lord Wallace, on Campaigning Liberals in the 1950s and 1960s.
    [Show full text]
  • Reginald Mckenna British Politics and Society
    Reginald McKenna British Politics and Society PETER CATTERALL, Series Editor The Making of Channel 4 Mass Conservatism Edited by Peter Catterall The Conservatives and the Public since the 1880s Managing Domestic Dissent in First Edited by Stuart Ball and Ian Holliday World War Britain Brock Millman Defining British Citizenship Empire, Commonwealth and Modern Reforming the Constitution Britain Debates in Twentieth Century Britain Rieko Karatani Edited by Peter Catterall, Wolfram Kaiser and Ulrike Walton-Jordan Television Policies of the Labour Party 1951-2001 Pessimism and British War Policy, Des Freedman 1916-1918 Brock Millman Creating the National Health Service Aneurin Bevan and the Medical Lords Amateurs and Professionals in Marvin Rintala Post-War British Sport Edited by Adrian Smith and Dilwyn A Social History of Milton Keynes Porter Middle England/Edge City Mark Clapson A Life of Sir John Eldon Gorst Disraeli's Awkward Disciple Scottish Nationalism and the Idea of Archie Hunter Europe Concepts of Europe and the Nation Conservative Party Attitudes to Atsuko Ichijo Jews 1900-1950 Harry Defries The Royal Navy in the Falklands Conflict and the Gulf War Poor Health Culture and Strategy Social Inequality before and after the Alastair Finlan Black Report Edited by Virginia Berridge and Stuart The Labour Party in Opposition Blume 1970-1974 Patrick Bell The Civil Service Commission Reginald McKenna 1855-1991 Financier among Statesmen, 1863- A Bureau Biography 1916 Richard A. Chapman Martin Farr Popular Newspapers, the Labour Party and British Politics James Thomas In the Midst of Events The Foreign Office Diaries and Papers of Kenneth Younger, February 1950- October 1951 Edited by Geoffrey Warner Strangers, Aliens and Asians Huguenots, Jews and Bangladeshis in Spitalfields 1666-2000 Anne J.
    [Show full text]
  • Glasgow Rent Strikes 1915: the Struggle for Decent Housing
    GLASGOW RENT STRIKES 1915: THE STRUGGLE FOR DECENT HOUSING THE GLASGOW RENT STRIKES, 1915: THEIR CONTRIBUTION AND THAT OF JOHN WHEATLY AND PATRICK DOLLAN TO THE LONGER STRUGGLE FOR DECENT WORKING-CLASS HOUSING By Matthew J. McQueen, MB. ChB., PhD., FRCPC, HonFRCPath. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Degree Master of Arts McMaster University ©Copyright by Matthew J. McQueen, May 2017 McMaster University MASTER OF ARTS (2017) Hamilton, Ontario (History) TITLE: The Glasgow Rent Strikes, 1915: their contribution and that of John Wheatley and Patrick Dollan to the longer struggle for decent working-class housing AUTHOR: Matthew J. McQueen, MB. ChB., PhD. (University of Glasgow) SUPERVISOR: Professor Stephen Heathorn NUMBER OF PAGES: ix, 92 + Bibliography (14) ii LAY ABSTRACT Glasgow, with notoriously poor working-class housing, was a major centre in 1915 for British engineering, munitions and shipbuilding industries during the First World War. Women who lived in Glasgow’s tenements organised rent strikes and physically resisted rent increases and evictions. They were supported by the Independent Labour Party and the collaborations it developed before and during the war with organisations representing the interests of women and labour. These strikes, the rent agitations in England, and the threat of industrial action in Glasgow, forced the Government to pass the Rent Restrictions Act 1915, which limited rents to pre-war levels. Two former miners, John Wheatley and Patrick Dollan, were leaders in organising this class victory. They recognised the Act’s limitations and then worked nationally and municipally in the longer struggle for better working-class housing.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Intervention in the Long Nineteenth Century Setting the Precedent
    the long nineteenth century Humanitarian intervention in Humanitarian intervention in the long nineteenth century Setting the precedent During the course of the long nineteenth century, a precedent was set for the theory and practice of humanitarian intervention that is still influencing the current debate on this controversial concept. This volume provides a comprehensive presentation of the development of humanitarian theories in international law and international political theory, and assesses four nineteenth-century case studies, linking them to the ongoing theoretical arguments, with an emphasis on the lesser-known Russian dimension. The book starts with a brief overview of the current situation, and goes on to present a genealogy of the idea of assisting people who Humanitarian intervention are maltreated. The concept is first found in the Renaissance, and was followed by the nineteenth-century civilization–barbarity dichotomy, in the long nineteenth with its biased Eurocentric gaze. The authors then examine the pivotal international law dimension, the arguments of advocates and opponents of humanitarian intervention, and the views of major political theorists. century The second part of the book examines in detail four instances of humanitarian intervention: the Greek war (1821–31); the Lebanon/Syria ethnic conflict (1860–61); the Bulgarian case (1876–78), with emphasis on Setting the precedent the role of Britain and Russia; and US intervention in Cuba (1895–98). The book will be of benefit to scholars and students of international
    [Show full text]