DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2011.02267V2 [Astro-Ph.GA] 21 Jun 2021 Arations Comparable to a Recently-Discovered Object [31]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2011.02267V2 [Astro-Ph.GA] 21 Jun 2021 Arations Comparable to a Recently-Discovered Object [31] Testing the Black Hole No-hair Theorem with Galactic Center Stellar Orbits Hong Qi,1, 2, ∗ Richard O'Shaughnessy,3 and Patrick Brady2 1School of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 3AA, United Kingdom 2Center for Gravitation Cosmology and Astrophysics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA 3Center for Computational Relativity and Gravitation, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA (Dated: June 22, 2021) Theoretical investigations have provided proof-of-principle calculations suggesting measurements of stellar or pulsar orbits near the Galactic Center could strongly constrain the properties of the Galactic Center black hole, local matter, and even the theory of gravity itself. As in previous studies, we use a Markov chain Monte Carlo to quantify what properties of the Galactic Center environment measurements can constrain. In this work, however, we also develop an analytic model (Fisher matrix) to understand what parameters are well-constrained and why. Using both tools, we conclude that existing astrometric measurements cannot constrain the spin of the Galactic Center black hole. Extrapolating to the precision and cadence of future experiments, we anticipate that the black hole spin can be measured with the known star S2. Our calculations show that we can measure the dimensionless black hole spin to a precision of ∼0.1 with weekly measurements of the orbit of S2 for 40 years using the GRAVITY telescope's best resolution at the Galactic Center, i.e., an angular resolution of 10 µarcsecond and a radial velocity resolution of 500 m/s. An analytic expression is derived for the measurement uncertainty of the black hole spin using Fisher matrix in terms of observation strategy, star's orbital parameters, and instrument resolution. From it we conclude that highly eccentric orbits can provide better constraints on the spin, and that an orbit with a higher eccentricity is more favorable even when the orbital period is longer. We also apply it to S62, S4711, and S4714 to show whether they can constrain the black hole spin sooner than S2. If in addition future measurements include discovery of a new, tighter stellar orbit, then future data could conceivably enable tests of strong field gravity, by directly measuring the black hole quadrupole moment. Our simulations show that with a stellar orbit similar to that of S2 but at one fifth the distance to the Galactic Center and GRAVITY's resolution limits on the Galactic Center, we can start to test the no-hair theorem with 20 years of weekly orbital measurements. I. INTRODUCTION [2] can constrain the black hole properties: its mass and particularly its spin. Specifically, we wrote a Markov The supermassive black hole at the center of our galaxy chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) code and use it to compare provides unique opportunities to investigate dynamics real and synthetic astrometric and radial velocity data near a strongly-gravitating source [1,2]. Radio tele- with models for the stellar orbits and black hole mass, scopes have imaged the immediate vicinity of the black accounting for differences in reference frame between dif- hole [3,4], allowing direct constraints on the strong grav- ferent observational campaigns. Unlike previous investi- itational field regime near the black hole via imaging ac- gations, our model includes leading order post Newtonian cretion flows [5{10]. Stellar motions also constrain the corrections to the orbit from the black hole's mass, spin, number and orbits of nearby perturbers [11]. At present, and quadrupole moment, as well as the impact of un- however, the best opportunities to constrain the Galactic known non-quadrupole internal and exterior potentials. Center come from long-term monitoring of known stars Our goal is to determine whether, despite the extremely [12{16]. These measurements can also identify effects low orbital velocity v=c ' 0:02, future measurements can from the strong gravitational field [17{19] and the prop- significantly constrain strong-field features of the Galac- erties of the supermassive black hole [2, 12{14, 20{25]. tic Center black hole. We compare our MCMC results Even stronger constraints would be possible with a well- against a detailed Fisher matrix analysis, both to validate timed pulsar orbiting the Galactic Center [26{30], at sep- our results and allow the reader to easily extrapolate to arXiv:2011.02267v2 [astro-ph.GA] 21 Jun 2021 arations comparable to a recently-discovered object [31]. future measurement scenarios. High precision inference from stellar orbits ideally should This paper is organized as follows. In Section II we account for many nearby perturbers, including the local review the observations of stellar orbits near the Galac- stellar density of visible stars [32] and compact objects tic Center; review a simplified model for stellar dynamics [22]. near supermassive black holes (justified at length in Ap- Motivated by recent discoveries of new stars in close pendixA); introduce simplified and realistic models for orbits around the Galactic Center [33], we assess how the process of measuring stellar orbits, including errors. well existing and future measurements of stellar orbits In Section III we describe two techniques to assess how well measurements can constrain properties of stellar or- bits and the supermassive black hole. The first is a sim- plified, approximate Fisher matrix. The second method ∗ [email protected] uses detailed Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations of 2 synthetic data to determine how well different param- B. Simplified models of stellar orbits eters can be measured and why. After validating our procedure using analytically tractable toy models with a The approximations involved in deriving and justify- handful of parameters, we perform full-scale simulations ing our equations of motion are provided in Appendix in SectionIV to test several hypotheses including no-hair A. Neglecting the black hole's recoil or the effect of am- theorem. Using plausible choices of parameters and fu- bient material, each star's position x evolves accord- ture achievable measurement accuracy, we discuss how ing to leading-order post-Newtonian equations of motion the black hole spin and quadrupole moment can be con- [21, 39, 40] strained with the known star S2 of an orbital period of Mx Mx M Mr_ about 16 years at about 5mpc distance from the black a = − + (4 − v2) + 4 v hole and future discoverable closer stars with orbital pe- r3 r3 r r2 2J riods as small as 1-2 years at about 1 mpc separation − [2v × J^ − 3r _^n × J^ − 3^n(L · J^)=r] [34]. We also discuss how these constraints can be af- r3 fected by an intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH) and 3 Q2 + [5^n(^n · J^)2 − 2(^n · J^)J^ − ^n]; (1) a cluster of other stars in the Galactic Center. In Sec- 2 r4 tionV we summarize the conclusions we draw from the 2 where x; v = @tx; a = @t x are the harmonic coor- studies. Throughout the paper we adopt the units where dinate position, velocity, and acceleration of the star, G = c = 1. r = jxj is the coordinate distance of the star from the black hole, ^n = x=r is a unit vector pointing towards the star, L = x × v is the orbital angular momentum, M; J;Q = −J 2=M are the mass, spin angular momen- II. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM 2 tum, and quadrupole moment of the black hole, and the hat over a quantity denotes its unit vector, such A. Existing Observations as J^ = J=J. Each star evolves according to a post- Newtonian Hamiltonian in [41]. There are observations of stellar orbits within 1 arcsec- For the proof-of-concept analytic calculations, we sepa- ond of the Galactic Center in infrared [13, 14, 16, 33]. In rate timescales by orbit-averaging rather than work with this paper, we are analyzing two sets of long-duration ob- the full Hamiltonian, following standard practice in ce- servations reported in Ghez et al. [13] and Gillessen et al. lestial mechanics. For analytic simplicity, we will fur- [14]. The motions of stars in the immediate vicinity of Sgr thermore treat all perturbations at leading order, there- A* have been observed in infrared bands by NTT/VLT fore performing an orbit average using a Newtonian orbit; since 1992 and by Keck telescope since 1995. The two for example, at leading order an equatorial orbit has the 2 data sets we use are the Keck data from 1995 to 2007 and form r(t) = p=(1 + e cos Φ(t)), where p = a(1 − e ) is a the VLT data from 1992 to 2009. Massive young stars semilatus rectum, a is the semimajor axis, e is the ec- are found closely orbiting the black hole at the center of centricity of the orbit, and Φ(t) is the orbital phase in our Milky Way. The locations of the stars, i.e., the astro- terms of time t. Using standard methods of celestial me- metric positions, right ascensions (RA) and declinations chanics [21, 42], we find the secular equations of motion (DEC) are recorded at different epochs. Therefore, the for the orbit average (hXi) of each star's Newtonian or- relative positions of stars to the radio source Sgr A* , i.e., bital angular momentum LN ≡ µx × v and Newtonian 2 the offsets of RA and DEC are also measured. The radial Runge-Lenz vector AN ≡ µ [v × (x × v) − GM ^n]: velocities, i.e., the line of sight components of the veloc- @ hL i = Ω~ × hL i (2) ities relative the the observers, of each star at different t N N epochs are also measured. In this work, we use the stellar @t hAN i = Ω~ × hAN i (3) orbit of star S2, because it is monitored for the longest Ω~ = Ω~ + Ω~ + Ω~ (4) time, its orbit is only 16 years, and more importantly its S J Q eccentricity is high among the few closest orbits that have ~ ^ AS ^ 3 ΩS = LN = LN 3 (5) been monitored frequently for over a decade.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Michael Perryman
    Michael Perryman Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge (1977−79) European Space Agency, NL (1980−2009) (Hipparcos 1981−1997; Gaia 1995−2009) [Leiden University, NL,1993−2009] Max-Planck Institute for Astronomy & Heidelberg University (2010) Visiting Professor: University of Bristol (2011−12) University College Dublin (2012−13) Lecture program 1. Space Astrometry 1/3: History, rationale, and Hipparcos 2. Space Astrometry 2/3: Hipparcos science results (Tue 5 Nov) 3. Space Astrometry 3/3: Gaia (Thu 7 Nov) 4. Exoplanets: prospects for Gaia (Thu 14 Nov) 5. Some aspects of optical photon detection (Tue 19 Nov) M83 (David Malin) Hipparcos Text Our Sun Gaia Parallax measurement principle… Problematic from Earth: Sun (1) obtaining absolute parallaxes from relative measurements Earth (2) complicated by atmosphere [+ thermal/gravitational flexure] (3) no all-sky visibility Some history: the first 2000 years • 200 BC (ancient Greeks): • size and distance of Sun and Moon; motion of the planets • 900–1200: developing Islamic culture • 1500–1700: resurgence of scientific enquiry: • Earth moves around the Sun (Copernicus), better observations (Tycho) • motion of the planets (Kepler); laws of gravity and motion (Newton) • navigation at sea; understanding the Earth’s motion through space • 1718: Edmond Halley • first to measure the movement of the stars through space • 1725: James Bradley measured stellar aberration • Earth’s motion; finite speed of light; immensity of stellar distances • 1783: Herschel inferred Sun’s motion through space • 1838–39: Bessell/Henderson/Struve
    [Show full text]
  • Astrometry and Optics During the Past 2000 Years
    1 Astrometry and optics during the past 2000 years Erik Høg Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark 2011.05.03: Collection of reports from November 2008 ABSTRACT: The satellite missions Hipparcos and Gaia by the European Space Agency will together bring a decrease of astrometric errors by a factor 10000, four orders of magnitude, more than was achieved during the preceding 500 years. This modern development of astrometry was at first obtained by photoelectric astrometry. An experiment with this technique in 1925 led to the Hipparcos satellite mission in the years 1989-93 as described in the following reports Nos. 1 and 10. The report No. 11 is about the subsequent period of space astrometry with CCDs in a scanning satellite. This period began in 1992 with my proposal of a mission called Roemer, which led to the Gaia mission due for launch in 2013. My contributions to the history of astrometry and optics are based on 50 years of work in the field of astrometry but the reports cover spans of time within the past 2000 years, e.g., 400 years of astrometry, 650 years of optics, and the “miraculous” approval of the Hipparcos satellite mission during a few months of 1980. 2011.05.03: Collection of reports from November 2008. The following contains overview with summary and link to the reports Nos. 1-9 from 2008 and Nos. 10-13 from 2011. The reports are collected in two big file, see details on p.8. CONTENTS of Nos. 1-9 from 2008 No. Title Overview with links to all reports 2 1 Bengt Strömgren and modern astrometry: 5 Development of photoelectric astrometry including the Hipparcos mission 1A Bengt Strömgren and modern astrometry ..
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Coordinate Systems
    2 Coordinate systems In order to find something one needs a system of coordinates. For determining the positions of the stars and planets where the distance to the object often is unknown it usually suffices to use two coordinates. On the other hand, since the Earth rotates around it’s own axis as well as around the Sun the positions of stars and planets is continually changing, and the measurment of when an object is in a certain place is as important as deciding where it is. Our first task is to decide on a coordinate system and the position of 1. The origin. E.g. one’s own location, the center of the Earth, the, the center of the Solar System, the Galaxy, etc. 2. The fundamental plan (x−y plane). This is often a plane of some physical significance such as the horizon, the equator, or the ecliptic. 3. Decide on the direction of the positive x-axis, also known as the “reference direction”. 4. And, finally, on a convention of signs of the y− and z− axes, i.e whether to use a left-handed or right-handed coordinate system. For example Eratosthenes of Cyrene (c. 276 BC c. 195 BC) was a Greek mathematician, elegiac poet, athlete, geographer, astronomer, and music theo- rist who invented a system of latitude and longitude. (According to Wikipedia he was also the first person to use the word geography and invented the disci- pline of geography as we understand it.). The origin of this coordinate system was the center of the Earth and the fundamental plane was the equator, which location Eratosthenes calculated relative to the parts of the Earth known to him.
    [Show full text]
  • COORDINATES, TIME, and the SKY John Thorstensen
    COORDINATES, TIME, AND THE SKY John Thorstensen Department of Physics and Astronomy Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755 This subject is fundamental to anyone who looks at the heavens; it is aesthetically and mathematically beautiful, and rich in history. Yet I'm not aware of any text which treats time and the sky at a level appropriate for the audience I meet in the more technical introductory astronomy course. The treatments I've seen either tend to be very lengthy and quite technical, as in the classic texts on `spherical astronomy', or overly simplified. The aim of this brief monograph is to explain these topics in a manner which takes advantage of the mathematics accessible to a college freshman with a good background in science and math. This math, with a few well-chosen extensions, makes it possible to discuss these topics with a good degree of precision and rigor. Students at this level who study this text carefully, work examples, and think about the issues involved can expect to master the subject at a useful level. While the mathematics used here are not particularly advanced, I caution that the geometry is not always trivial to visualize, and the definitions do require some careful thought even for more advanced students. Coordinate Systems for Direction Think for the moment of the problem of describing the direction of a star in the sky. Any star is so far away that, no matter where on earth you view it from, it appears to be in almost exactly the same direction. This is not necessarily the case for an object in the solar system; the moon, for instance, is only 60 earth radii away, so its direction can vary by more than a degree as seen from different points on earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Chasing the Pole — Howard L. Cohen
    Reprinted From AAC Newsletter FirstLight (2010 May/June) Chasing the Pole — Howard L. Cohen Polaris like supernal beacon burns, a pivot-gem amid our star-lit Dome ~ Charles Never Holmes (1916) ew star gazers often believe the North Star (Polaris) is brightest of all, even mistaking Venus for this best known star. More advanced star gazers soon learn dozens of Nnighttime gems appear brighter, forty-seven in fact. Polaris only shines at magnitude +2.0 and can even be difficult to see in light polluted skies. On the other hand, Sirius, brightest of all nighttime stars (at magnitude -1.4), shines twenty-five times brighter! Beginning star gazers also often believe this guidepost star faithfully defines the direction north. Although other stars staunchly circle the heavens during night’s darkness, many think this pole star remains steadfast in its position always marking a fixed point on the sky. Indeed, a popular and often used Shakespeare quote (from Julius Caesar) is in tune with this perception: “I am constant as the northern star, Of whose true-fix'd and resting quality There is no fellow in the firmament.” More advanced star gazers know better, that the “true-fix’d and resting quality”of the northern star is only an approximation. Not only does this north star slowly circle the northen heavenly pole (Fig. 1) but this famous star is also not quite constant in light, slightly varying about 0.03 magnitudes. Polaris, in fact, is the brightest appearing Cepheid variable, a type of pulsating star. Still, Polaris is a good marker of the north cardinal point.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Star Catalogues
    A History of Star Catalogues © Rick Thurmond 2003 Abstract Throughout the history of astronomy there have been a large number of catalogues of stars. The different catalogues reflect different interests in the sky throughout history, as well as changes in technology. A star catalogue is a major undertaking, and likely needs strong justification as well as the latest instrumentation. In this paper I will describe a representative sample of star catalogues through history and try to explain the reasons for conducting them and the technology used. Along the way I explain some relevent terms in italicized sections. While the story of any one catalogue can be the subject of a whole book (and several are) it is interesting to survey the history and note the trends in star catalogues. 1 Contents Abstract 1 1. Origin of Star Names 4 2. Hipparchus 4 • Precession 4 3. Almagest 5 4. Ulugh Beg 6 5. Brahe and Kepler 8 6. Bayer 9 7. Hevelius 9 • Coordinate Systems 14 8. Flamsteed 15 • Mural Arc 17 9. Lacaille 18 10. Piazzi 18 11. Baily 19 12. Fundamental Catalogues 19 12.1. FK3-FK5 20 13. Berliner Durchmusterung 20 • Meridian Telescopes 21 13.1. Sudlich Durchmusterung 21 13.2. Cordoba Durchmusterung 22 13.3. Cape Photographic Durchmusterung 22 14. Carte du Ciel 23 2 15. Greenwich Catalogues 24 16. AGK 25 16.1. AGK3 26 17. Yale Bright Star Catalog 27 18. Preliminary General Catalogue 28 18.1. Albany Zone Catalogues 30 18.2. San Luis Catalogue 31 18.3. Albany Catalogue 33 19. Henry Draper Catalogue 33 19.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Astrometry of Asteroids Student Manual
    Name: Lab Partner: Astrometry of Asteroids Student Manual A Manual to Accompany Software for the Introductory Astronomy Lab Exercise Edited by Lucy Kulbago, John Carroll University 11/24/2008 Department of Physics Gettysburg College Gettysburg, PA Telephone: (717) 337-6028 Email: [email protected] Student Manual Contents Goals ..........................................................................................................................3 Introduction ..............................................................................................................4 Operating the Computer Program .........................................................................9 Part I Finding an Asteroid ......................................................................................9 Part II Measuring its’ Position ..............................................................................13 Part III Calculating Angular Velocity ..................................................................19 Part IV Measuring Distance using Parallax .........................................................22 Part V Tangential Velocity of Asteroid 1992 JB .................................................25 Questions .................................................................................................................26 Optional Activity .....................................................................................................27 References ...............................................................................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • STAR FINDER and IDENTIFIER S-3A
    STAR FINDER AND IDENTIFIER S-3a by Stjepo M. K o t l a r ic Scientific Co-worker Hydrographic Institute of the Yugoslav Navy The new Star Finder and Identifier named S-3a, developed by the author of this paper is designed primarily for use with the American Nautical Almanac. A short description and examples of its use with the star chart No. 8 given here will demonstrate the simplicity and accuracy of this solution of star identification problems. SHORT DESCRIPTION This Star Finder comprises 57 selected stars taken from the daily pages of the American Nautical Almanac and the remaining 116 stars taken from the star list near the end of this Almanac, with the addition of a further 9 fainter stars. Thus the stars used for celestial navigation, from practically all the Nautical Almanacs in the world, are shown in this Finder. In fact, it is the second variant of a Star Finder developed by the same author and described in the paper “ New Star Finder Superseding the Star Globe ” published in January 1963 edition of the International Hydro­ graphic Review. This has been modified so as to reduce the number of star charts from 36 to only 18, and primarily to enable its direct application to the American Nautical Almanac and other similar Almanacs (the British, Brazilian, Norwegian, ate.), while retaining the original accurate and simple solution procedure. A continuous picture of star positions with respect to all values of both the local hour angle of the First Point of Aries and all latitudes of the observer is the desired goal for all star finders.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy 113 Laboratory Manual
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON Department of Astronomy Astronomy 113 Laboratory Manual Fall 2011 Professor: Snezana Stanimirovic 4514 Sterling Hall [email protected] TA: Natalie Gosnell 6283B Chamberlin Hall [email protected] 1 2 Contents Introduction 1 Celestial Rhythms: An Introduction to the Sky 2 The Moons of Jupiter 3 Telescopes 4 The Distances to the Stars 5 The Sun 6 Spectral Classification 7 The Universe circa 1900 8 The Expansion of the Universe 3 ASTRONOMY 113 Laboratory Introduction Astronomy 113 is a hands-on tour of the visible universe through computer simulated and experimental exploration. During the 14 lab sessions, we will encounter objects located in our own solar system, stars filling the Milky Way, and objects located much further away in the far reaches of space. Astronomy is an observational science, as opposed to most of the rest of physics, which is experimental in nature. Astronomers cannot create a star in the lab and study it, walk around it, change it, or explode it. Astronomers can only observe the sky as it is, and from their observations deduce models of the universe and its contents. They cannot ever repeat the same experiment twice with exactly the same parameters and conditions. Remember this as the universe is laid out before you in Astronomy 113 – the story always begins with only points of light in the sky. From this perspective, our understanding of the universe is truly one of the greatest intellectual challenges and achievements of mankind. The exploration of the universe is also a lot of fun, an experience that is largely missed sitting in a lecture hall or doing homework.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes on Astronomy PH2900 – 2007/2008
    Lecture Notes on Astronomy PH2900 – 2007/2008 Glen D. Cowan Physics Department Last revised: April 27, 2010 Preface The main objectives of this course will be to understand how astronomical observations are made and interpreted, to introduce our nearest celestial neighbours in the solar system, and to understand current theories on how these bodies formed and what processes shaped their surfaces. For 2007/2008 these course notes will still be incomplete. Some supplemental information can be found on the course web page, http://www.pp.rhul.ac.uk/~cowan/astro_course.html For further information, the books best suited for this course are Introductory Astronomy and Astrophysics by Zeilik and Gregory [1] and Fundamental Astronomy by Karttunen et al. [2]. The book by Carroll and Ostlie [3] is also good but covers a much broader scope than needed for our course. Observational Astrophysics by Smith [4] has a good overview of observational techniques. It would be appreciated if corrections, suggestions and comments on these notes could be communicated to [email protected]. GDC October, 2007 i ii Contents Preface i 1 Introduction and overview 1 2 Coordinates and time 3 2.1 Coordinatesystems............................... .... 3 2.1.1 Thehorizonsystem .............................. 3 2.1.2 Theequatorialsystem . 4 2.1.3 Precessionoftheequinoxes . .... 7 2.1.4 Relating the horizon and equatorial coordinate systems .......... 8 2.2 Timekeepingsystems.............................. 13 2.2.1 Solarandsiderealtime. 13 2.2.2 Themeansunandtheequationoftime . 14 2.3 Puttingittogether ............................... 17 3 Optical telescopes 21 3.1 Goals of an optical telescope system . ........ 22 3.2 Lightgatheringpower ............................. 22 3.3 Refractingtelescopes . ...... 24 3.3.1 Chromaticaberration .
    [Show full text]
  • The Milky Way Galaxy
    TheThe MilkyMilky WayWay GalaxyGalaxy Daniela Carollo RSAA-Mount Stromlo Observatory-Australia Lecture N. 1 The Milky Way from the Death Valley InIn thisthis lecture:lecture: General characteristic of the Milky Way Reference Systems Astrometry Galactic Structures TheThe MilkyMilky WayWay Why it is so important? We live in the Milky Way! Our Galaxy is like a laboratory , it can be studied in unique detail. We can recognize its structures, and study the stellar populations. We can infer its formation and evolution using the tracers of its oldest part: the Halo Near field cosmology If we could see the Milky Way from the outside it might looks like our closest neighbor, the Andromeda Galaxy. NGC 2997 Face on view • We live at edge of disk • Disadvantage: structure obscured by “dust”. It is very difficult to observe towards the center of the Galaxy due to the strong absorption. • Advantage: can study motions of nearby stars COBE Near IR View Reference Systems Equatorial Coordinate System From Binney and Merrifield, Galactic Astronomy . Some definitions: Celestial sphere: an imaginary sphere of infinite radius centered on the Earth NCP and SCP: the extension of the Earth’s axis to the celestial sphere define the Nord and South Celestial Poles. The extension of the Earth’s Equatorial Plane determine the Celestial Equator Great Circle: a circle on the celestial sphere defined by the intersection of a plane passing through the sphere center, and the surface of the sphere. The great circle through the celestial poles and a star’s position is that star hour circle Zenith: that point at which the extended vertical line intersects the celestial sphere Meridian: great circle passing through the celestial poles and the zenith The earth rotates at an approximately constant rate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Celestial Sphere
    The Celestial Sphere * * * * * * * * * * This presentation is about the celestial sphere, an imaginary sphere of infinite radius around us which contains the stars and all other celestial objects. It is useful as a concept to facilitate understanding their positions and apparent motions, and forms the basis for © David Le Conte FRAS mathematical calculations relating to spherical astronomy. * * * * * * * * * * Let’s first have a short introductory course in celestial mechanics. 2 Horizon O We imagine an observer standing on the Earth at the position O. They perceive that they are standing on a flat surface with a 360 degree horizon. 3 Celestial meridian E N S O W Their meridian on the Earth passes through their north and south directions. Similarly we can imagine a ‘celestial meridian’ being an extension of the Earth meridian out into space and passing over the observer’s head. The compass points on the horizon are shown in this graphic. 4 Zenith E N S O W The direction directly above the observer is the Zenith; directly below is the 5 Nadir. Nadir Z N S O The celestial sphere can be conceived of as having infinite radius. We imagine a curve on the celestial sphere passing from the zenith, through a star and onto the horizon. 6 Z N S O We now draw line from observer to the same point on the horizon. 7 Z N S O And another line from the observer to the star. 8 Z altitude N S O This angle is the ‘altitude’ of the star in degrees. 9 Z altitude N S O We can interpret the altitude as a distance, also measured in degrees, from the horizon to the star on the ‘surface’ of the celestial sphere.
    [Show full text]