MICROBIAL Cr(VI) REDUCTION: ROLE of ELECTRON DONORS, ACCEPTORS, and MECHANISMS, with SPECIAL EMPHASIS on CLOSTRIDIUM Spp

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MICROBIAL Cr(VI) REDUCTION: ROLE of ELECTRON DONORS, ACCEPTORS, and MECHANISMS, with SPECIAL EMPHASIS on CLOSTRIDIUM Spp MICROBIAL Cr(VI) REDUCTION: ROLE OF ELECTRON DONORS, ACCEPTORS, AND MECHANISMS, WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON CLOSTRIDIUM spp. By KANIKA SHARMA A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2002 Copyright 2002 by Kanika Sharma For my parents, whose support and understanding has helped culminate my dream into a reality. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am grateful to my mentor, Dr. Andrew V. Ogram, for excellent supervision during the course of this dissertation. He has truly been a great source of inspiration, insight, and input. The knowledge he has imparted, and the patience he has displayed was vital to completing this study. I am thankful for the immense encouragement and financial support that he graciously provided during this study. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the committee members, Drs. K. Hatfield, L. O. Ingram, K. R. Reddy, and R. D. Rhue, for each contributing in special and meaningful ways to my personal development and academic success. I also thank Drs. W. Harris, L.T. Ou, and H. Aldrich for all of their advice and help. A special word of thanks is due to Dr. Derek Lovley, and members of his lab at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, for extending their lab facilities so that I might learn various anaerobic microbial techniques. At this time, I would also like to thank Dr. John Thomas, Bill Reve, and Irene Poyer for all their help with the analytical equipment. I am especially grateful to T. Van Pham and Lisa Stanley who provided me the extra pair of hands when work demanded. I thank Ilker Uz and Hector Castro for being wonderful friends and for being by my side through all happy and tough times. I sincerely thank members of my lab, past and present, Viji Ramakrishnan, Weiwei Chen, Drs. Yong Ping Duan, Milind A. Chavan, and Ashvini Chauhan. Without the advice and friendship of these colleagues, surviving the last 5 years would have been impossible. iv I acknowledge the support of the faculty, staff, and all the graduate students in the Soil and Water Science Department. I owe much of my academic and personal success to my parents and my brother, who, by example, provided me with the motivation and courage to pursue a Ph.D. degree. Special thanks go to my friends, near and far, for their love and support that made my stay at University of Florida so memorable. v TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. iv LIST OF TABLES........................................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... ix LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .......................................................... xi ABSTRACT...................................................................................................................... xii CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION........................................................................................1 Chromium in Environment ............................................................................................. 1 Nutrition and Toxicity: Risks to Human Health............................................................. 2 Animals .................................................................................................................... 2 Plants and Algae....................................................................................................... 3 Microorganisms ....................................................................................................... 3 Environmental Chemistry ............................................................................................... 5 Reduction of Cr(VI) ................................................................................................. 6 Oxidation of Cr(III) in Soils..................................................................................... 7 Cr(VI) Remediation Strategies ....................................................................................... 7 Chromium Resistance in Bacteria................................................................................... 9 Pathways for Chromium(VI) Reduction....................................................................... 11 Direct Enzymatic Reduction of Cr(VI).................................................................. 11 Bacterially Mediated Indirect Reduction of Cr(VI)............................................... 13 Factors Affecting Microbial Chromium Reduction...................................................... 15 Outline of Dissertation.................................................................................................. 18 2 ENRICHMENT, ISOLATION, AND CHARACTERIZATION OF Cr(VI)- REDUCING BACTERIA .............................................................................................27 Introduction................................................................................................................... 27 Materials and Methods.................................................................................................. 29 Results and Discussion ................................................................................................. 33 Effect of Electron Donors and Acceptors on Cr(VI) Reduction............................ 33 Phylogenetic Analysis of Cr(VI) Reducing Bacteria............................................. 36 vi 3 Cr(VI) REDUCTION BY A CONSORTIUM OF GRAM POSITIVE FERMENTATIVE BACTERIA ...................................................................................42 Introduction................................................................................................................... 42 Materials and Methods.................................................................................................. 43 Results and Discussion ................................................................................................. 45 Composition of Fermentative Consortium GCAF ................................................. 45 Biotic versus Abiotic Reduction of Cr(VI) ............................................................ 45 Kinetics of Cr(VI) Reduction................................................................................. 46 Effect of Electron Donor on Cr(VI) Reduction ..................................................... 47 Effect of Cr(VI) Reduction on Cell Growth in Consortium GCAF....................... 47 Effect of Cr(VI) on Metabolites............................................................................. 47 4 IDENTIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF THE CHROMIUM REDUCING ISOLATE CLOSTRIDIUM sp. GCAF1 ..................................................58 Introduction................................................................................................................... 58 Material and Methods ................................................................................................... 59 Results and Discussion ................................................................................................. 62 Chemotaxonomic Data........................................................................................... 63 Phylogeny of Strain GCAF-1................................................................................. 63 5 ELECTRON SHUTTLE-MEDIATED CHROMIUM REDUCTION BY CLOSTRIDIUM sp GCAF-1 .........................................................................................79 Introduction................................................................................................................... 79 Materials and Methods.................................................................................................. 80 Results and Discussion ................................................................................................. 82 Effect of Cr(VI) on Production of Metabolic Products of Strain GCAF-1............ 85 Proposed Mechanism of Cr(VI) Reduction by Strain GCAF-1............................. 86 Environmental Relevance of Cr(VI) Reduction by Gram Positive Spore-forming Fermentative Species.............................................................. 87 6 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................97 APPENDIX MEDIA USED FOR ENRICHMENT STUDIES......................................103 LIST OF REFERENCES.................................................................................................104 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ...........................................................................................119 vii LIST OF TABLES Table page 1-1. Cr(VI) reducing bacteria described in literature.........................................................24 2-1. Combination of electron acceptors and donors supplemented in the media for anaerobic enrichment studies.................................................................................38 2-2. Accession numbers for 16S rDNA sequences used in this study...............................39 3-1. Cell growth in the presence of different electron acceptors .......................................56 3-2. Cr(VI) reduction by consortium GCAF in presence of varying concentrations of electron donor ........................................................................................................56
Recommended publications
  • Structure and Dynamics of the Microbial Communities Underlying the Carboxylate Platform for Biofuel Production
    Structure and dynamics of the microbial communities underlying the carboxylate platform for biofuel production E.B. Hollister 1, A.K. Forrest 2, H.H. Wilkinson 3, D.J. Ebbole 3, S.A. Malfatti 4, S.G. Tringe 4, M.T. Holtzapple 2, T.J. Gentry 1 1 Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA 77843-2474 2 Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA 77843-3122 3 Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX USA 77843-2132 4 DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, USA 94598 July 31, 2010 ACKNOWLEDGMENT The work conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231 DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor The Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the University of California.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Materials
    SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS Table S1. Chemical characteristics of the two digestate forms (SD and WD). Values quoted are expressed as % of air-dry digestate (means followed by standard error in brackets). References for the employed methods used for determination of each chemical characteristic is also reported. SD WD Reference Org C % 44.4 (0.33) 1.1 (0.01) [81] Tot N % 1.4 (0.01) 0.4 (0.01) [82] C/N 31.4 (0.17) 3.1 (0.04) NH4-N % n.d 0.2 (0.00) [83] K % 1.7 (0.00) n.d. [84] P % 0.9 (0.01) n.d. [84] S % 0.23 (0.02) n.d. [85] SD = solid digestate; WD = whole digestate. Table S2. Soil physical and chemical characteristics at the beginning of trial (t0) (means from 9 observations followed by standard errors in brackets). Clay (%) 41.9 (1.22) Silt (%) 47.8 (2.13) Moisture (%) 24.46 (1.24) Bulk density (g cm-3) 1.39 (0.04) pH 8.3 (0) CaCO3 (%) 11.4 (0.7) TOC (g kg-1) 12.8 (0.3) TN (g kg-1) 1.4 (0) C/N 9.4 (0.3) CEC (cmol(+) kg-1) 21.0 (0.7) Exchangeable Bases (mg kg-1) K 278.7 (8.0) Na 22.0 (3.0) Mg 201.7 (25.6) Ca 3718.6 (176.3) Available Microelements (mg kg-1) Cu 28.0 (5.0) Zn 1.7 (0.2) Fe 15.4 (0.5) Mn 16.3 (0.5) TOC = total organic C; TN = total N; CEC = cation exchange capacity Table S3.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2018/064165 A2 (.Pdf)
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2018/064165 A2 05 April 2018 (05.04.2018) W !P O PCT (51) International Patent Classification: Published: A61K 35/74 (20 15.0 1) C12N 1/21 (2006 .01) — without international search report and to be republished (21) International Application Number: upon receipt of that report (Rule 48.2(g)) PCT/US2017/053717 — with sequence listing part of description (Rule 5.2(a)) (22) International Filing Date: 27 September 2017 (27.09.2017) (25) Filing Language: English (26) Publication Langi English (30) Priority Data: 62/400,372 27 September 2016 (27.09.2016) US 62/508,885 19 May 2017 (19.05.2017) US 62/557,566 12 September 2017 (12.09.2017) US (71) Applicant: BOARD OF REGENTS, THE UNIVERSI¬ TY OF TEXAS SYSTEM [US/US]; 210 West 7th St., Austin, TX 78701 (US). (72) Inventors: WARGO, Jennifer; 1814 Bissonnet St., Hous ton, TX 77005 (US). GOPALAKRISHNAN, Vanch- eswaran; 7900 Cambridge, Apt. 10-lb, Houston, TX 77054 (US). (74) Agent: BYRD, Marshall, P.; Parker Highlander PLLC, 1120 S. Capital Of Texas Highway, Bldg. One, Suite 200, Austin, TX 78746 (US). (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DJ, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JO, JP, KE, KG, KH, KN, KP, KR, KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW.
    [Show full text]
  • Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria's Response to Extreme Ph Environments and the Effect of Their Activities on Microbial Corrosion
    applied sciences Review Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria’s Response to Extreme pH Environments and the Effect of Their Activities on Microbial Corrosion Thi Thuy Tien Tran 1 , Krishnan Kannoorpatti 1,* , Anna Padovan 2 and Suresh Thennadil 1 1 Energy and Resources Institute, College of Engineering, Information Technology and Environment, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia; [email protected] (T.T.T.T.); [email protected] (S.T.) 2 Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, College of Engineering, Information Technology and Environment, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are dominant species causing corrosion of various types of materials. However, they also play a beneficial role in bioremediation due to their tolerance of extreme pH conditions. The application of sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) in bioremediation and control methods for microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) in extreme pH environments requires an understanding of the microbial activities in these conditions. Recent studies have found that in order to survive and grow in high alkaline/acidic condition, SRB have developed several strategies to combat the environmental challenges. The strategies mainly include maintaining pH homeostasis in the cytoplasm and adjusting metabolic activities leading to changes in environmental pH. The change in pH of the environment and microbial activities in such conditions can have a Citation: Tran, T.T.T.; Kannoorpatti, significant impact on the microbial corrosion of materials. These bacteria strategies to combat extreme K.; Padovan, A.; Thennadil, S. pH environments and their effect on microbial corrosion are presented and discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis and Photoinduced Electron Transfer of Donor-Sensitizer-Acceptor Systems
    Synthesis and Photoinduced Electron Transfer of Donor-Sensitizer-Acceptor Systems Yunhua Xu Stockholm University 2005 1 Synthesis and Photoinduced Electron Transfer of Donor-Sensitizer-Acceptor Systems Akademisk avhandling som för avläggande av filosofie doktorsexamen vid Stockholms Universitet, tillsammans med arbetena I-VII, offentligen kommer att försvaras i Magnélisalen, Kemiska övnings-laboratoriet, Svante Arrhenius väg 16, onsdagen den 20 april 2005, klockan 10.00. Av Yunhua Xu Avhandlingen försvaras på engelska Institutionen för organisk kemi ISBN 91-7155-034-8 pp 1-53 Arrheniuslaboratoriet Stockholm 2005 Stockholms Universitet 106 91 Stockholm Abstract Artificial systems involving water oxidation and solar cells are promising ways for the conversion of solar energy into fuels and electricity. These systems usually consist of a photosensitizer, an electron donor and / or an electron acceptor. This thesis deals with the synthesis and photoinduced electron transfer of several donor-sensitizer- acceptor supramolecular systems. The first part of this thesis describes the synthesis and properties of two novel dinuclear ruthenium complexes as electron donors to mimic the donor side reaction of Photosystem II. These two Ru2 complexes were then covalently linked to ruthenium trisbipyridine and the properties of the resulting trinuclear complexes were studied by cyclic voltammetry and transient absorption spectroscopy. The second part presents the synthesis and photoinduced electron transfer of covalently linked donor-sensitizer supramolecular systems in the presence of TiO2 as electron acceptors. Electron donors are tyrosine, phenol and their derivatives, and dinuclear ruthenium complexes. Intramolecular electron transfer from the donor to the oxidized sensitizer was observed by transient absorption spectroscopy after light 2+ excitation of the Ru(bpy)3 moiety.
    [Show full text]
  • Donor/Acceptor Electronic Coupling Is a Dynamical Variable Edward W
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont All HMC Faculty Publications and Research HMC Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2000 Solvent as Electron Donor: Donor/Acceptor Electronic Coupling Is a Dynamical Variable Edward W. Castner Jr. Rutgers University Darcy Kennedy '00 Claremont McKenna College Robert J. Cave Harvey Mudd College Recommended Citation Castner, E.W. Jr.; Kennedy, D.; Cave, R.J. “Solvent as Electron Donor: Donor/Acceptor Coupling is a Dynamical Variable,” J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 2869. DOI: 10.1021/jp9936852 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the HMC Faculty Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in All HMC Faculty Publications and Research by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 2869-2885 2869 ARTICLES Solvent as Electron Donor: Donor/Acceptor Electronic Coupling Is a Dynamical Variable Edward W. Castner, Jr.*,† BrookhaVen National Laboratory, Chemistry Department, Building 555A, Upton, New York 11973-5000 Darcy Kennedy and Robert J. Cave*,‡ HarVey Mudd College, Department of Chemistry, Claremont, California 91711 ReceiVed: October 14, 1999; In Final Form: December 24, 1999 We combine analysis of measurements by femtosecond optical spectroscopy, computer simulations, and the generalized Mulliken-Hush (GMH) theory in the study of electron-transfer reactions and electron donor- acceptor interactions. Our focus is on ultrafast photoinduced electron-transfer reactions from aromatic amine solvent donors to excited-state acceptors. The experimental results from femtosecond dynamical measurements fall into three categories: six coumarin acceptors reductively quenched by N,N-dimethylaniline (DMA), eight electron-donating amine solvents reductively quenching coumarin 152 (7-(dimethylamino)-4-(trifluoromethyl)- coumarin), and reductive quenching dynamics of two coumarins by DMA as a function of dilution in the nonreactive solvents toluene and chlorobenzene.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Sampling Techniques and Different Media for The
    Systematic and Applied Microbiology 42 (2019) 481–487 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Systematic and Applied Microbiology jou rnal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/syapm Comparison of sampling techniques and different media for the enrichment and isolation of cellulolytic organisms from biogas fermentersଝ a a b a,∗ Regina Rettenmaier , Carina Duerr , Klaus Neuhaus , Wolfgang Liebl , a,c,∗ Vladimir V. Zverlov a Department of Microbiology, Technical University of Munich, Emil-Ramann-Str. 4, 85354 Freising, Germany b Core Facility Microbiome/NGS, ZIEL — Institute for Food & Health, Technical University of Munich, Weihenstephaner Berg 3, 85354 Freising, Germany c Institute of Molecular Genetics, RAS, Kurchatov Sq. 2, 123128 Moscow, Russia a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Biogas plants achieve its highest yield on plant biomass only with the most efficient hydrolysis of cellulose. Received 27 March 2019 This is driven by highly specialized hydrolytic microorganisms, which we have analyzed by investigating Received in revised form 15 May 2019 enrichment strategies for the isolation of cellulolytic bacteria out of a lab-scale biogas fermenter. We Accepted 17 May 2019 compared three different cultivation media as well as two different inoculation materials: Enrichment on filter paper in nylon bags (in sacco) or raw digestate. Next generation sequencing of the V3/V4 region Keywords: of the bacterial 16S rRNA of metagenomic DNA from six different enrichment cultures, each in biolog- Biogas fermenter ical triplicates, revealed an average richness of 48 different OTU’s with an average evenness of 0.3 in Cellulose degradation each sample.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Life, Bioenergetics and Metabolism
    Ocean life, bioenergetics and metabolism Biological Oceanography (OCN 621) Matthew Church (MSB 612) Ecosystems are hierarchically organized • Atoms → Molecules → Cells → Organisms→ Populations→ Communities • This organizational system dictates the pathways that energy and material travel through a system. • Cells are the lowest level of structure capable of performing ALL the functions of life. Classification of life Two primary cellular forms • Prokaryotes: lack internal membrane-bound organelles. Genetic information is not separated from other cell functions. Bacteria and Archaea are prokaryotes. Note however this does not imply these divisions of life are closely related. • Eukaryotes: membrane-bound organelles (nucleus, mitochrondrion, etc .). Compartmentalization (organization) of different cellular functions allows sequential intracellular activities In the ocean, microscopic organisms account for >50% of the living biomass. Controls on types of organisms, abundances, distributions • Habitat: The physical/chemical setting or characteristics of a particular environment, e.g., light vs. dark, cold vs. warm, high vs. low pressure • Each marine habitat supports a somewhat predictable assemblage of organisms that collectively make up the community, e.g., rocky intertidal community, coral reef community, abyssobenthic community • The structure and function of the individuals/populations in these communities arise from evolution and selective adaptations in response to the habitat characteristics • Niche: The role of a particular organism in an integrated community •The ocean is not homogenous: spatial and temporal variability in habitats Clearly distinguishable ocean habitats with elevated “plant” biomass in regions where nutrients are elevated The ocean is stirred more than mixed Sea Surface Temperature Chl a (°C) (mg m-3) Spatial discontinuities at various scales (basin, mesoscale, microscale) in ocean habitats play important roles in controlling plankton growth and distributions.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Biological Chemistry
    CHAPTER Introduction to Biological Chemistry Reza Karimi 1 1. Learn about the basic chemistry related to atoms and molecules. Understand the roles of orbitals and lone-pair electrons in a few common atoms (e.g., N, F, C, O) and comprehend nucleophilic/electrophilic attacks and their impact on oxidation, reduction, addition, and substitution reactions. 2. List and explain the importance of medicinal functional groups that commonly are found in drug molecules and appreciate the important roles that drug structures play in pharmaceutical sciences. 3. Understand basic concepts in acid–base theory and their roles in the structures of drug molecules. 4. Learn about salt formation, ionization, and water solubility of drug molecules, and explain the role of medici- nal functional groups in ionization, salt formation, salt hydrolysis, and water solubility of drug molecules. CHAPTER OUTLINE CHAPTER 5. Implement a series of Learning Bridge assignments at your experiential sites to bridge your didactic learning with your experiential experiences. S 1. Brønsted-Lowry acid–base: definition used to express the acidic or basic properties of acids and bases. E V 2. Buffer: a mixture of an acid and its conjugate base in a solution that causes the solution to resist a pH change. 3. Compound: a combination of two or more substances, ingredients, or elements. While the ecti J majority of drugs on the market are compounds, not all compounds are drugs. B 4. Conjugate acid: a base that has gained a proton. O 5. Conjugate base: an acid that has lost its proton. 6. Covalence: the number of covalent bonds present.
    [Show full text]
  • André Luis Alves Neves 6
    Elucidating the role of the rumen microbiome in cattle feed efficiency and its 1 potential as a reservoir for novel enzyme discovery 2 3 by 4 5 André Luis Alves Neves 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of 13 14 15 Doctor of Philosophy 16 17 in 18 19 Animal Science 20 21 22 23 24 25 Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science 26 University of Alberta 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 © André Luis Alves Neves, 2019 38 39 40 Abstract 1 2 The rapid advances in omics technologies have led to a tremendous progress in our 3 understanding of the rumen microbiome and its influence on cattle feed efficiency. 4 However, significant gaps remain in the literature concerning the driving forces that 5 influence the relationship between the rumen microbiota and host individual variation, and 6 how their interactive effects on animal productivity contribute to the identification of cattle 7 with improved feed efficiency. Furthermore, little is known about the impact of mRNA- 8 based metatranscriptomics on the analysis of rumen taxonomic profiles, and a strategy 9 for the discovery of lignocellulolytic enzymes through the targeted functional profiling of 10 carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) remains to be developed. Study 1 investigated 11 the dynamics of rumen microorganisms in cattle raised under different feeding regimens 12 (forage vs. grain) and studied the relationship among the abundance of these 13 microorganisms, host individuality and the diet. To examine host individual variation in 14 the rumen microbial abundance following dietary switches, hosts were grouped based on 15 the magnitude of microbial population shift using log2-fold change (log2-fc) in the copy 16 numbers of bacteria, archaea, protozoa and fungi.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2014/135633 Al 12 September 2014 (12.09.2014) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization I International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2014/135633 Al 12 September 2014 (12.09.2014) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every C12N 9/04 (2006.01) C12P 7/16 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, C12N 9/88 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, (21) Number: International Application DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, PCT/EP2014/054334 HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, (22) International Filing Date: KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, 6 March 2014 (06.03.2014) MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, (25) Filing Language: English SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, (26) Publication Language: English TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: 13 158012.8 6 March 2013 (06.03.2013) EP (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (71) Applicants: CLARIANT PRODUKTE (DEUTSCH- GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, LAND) GMBH [DE/DE]; Briiningstrasse 50, 65929 UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, Frankfurt am Main (DE).
    [Show full text]
  • From Genotype to Phenotype: Inferring Relationships Between Microbial Traits and Genomic Components
    From genotype to phenotype: inferring relationships between microbial traits and genomic components Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakult¨at der Heinrich-Heine-Universit¨atD¨usseldorf vorgelegt von Aaron Weimann aus Oberhausen D¨usseldorf,29.08.16 aus dem Institut f¨urInformatik der Heinrich-Heine-Universit¨atD¨usseldorf Gedruckt mit der Genehmigung der Mathemathisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakult¨atder Heinrich-Heine-Universit¨atD¨usseldorf Referent: Prof. Dr. Alice C. McHardy Koreferent: Prof. Dr. Martin J. Lercher Tag der m¨undlichen Pr¨ufung: 24.02.17 Selbststandigkeitserkl¨ arung¨ Hiermit erkl¨areich, dass ich die vorliegende Dissertation eigenst¨andigund ohne fremde Hilfe angefertig habe. Arbeiten Dritter wurden entsprechend zitiert. Diese Dissertation wurde bisher in dieser oder ¨ahnlicher Form noch bei keiner anderen Institution eingereicht. Ich habe bisher keine erfolglosen Promotionsversuche un- ternommen. D¨usseldorf,den . ... ... ... (Aaron Weimann) Statement of authorship I hereby certify that this dissertation is the result of my own work. No other person's work has been used without due acknowledgement. This dissertation has not been submitted in the same or similar form to other institutions. I have not previously failed a doctoral examination procedure. Summary Bacteria live in almost any imaginable environment, from the most extreme envi- ronments (e.g. in hydrothermal vents) to the bovine and human gastrointestinal tract. By adapting to such diverse environments, they have developed a large arsenal of enzymes involved in a wide variety of biochemical reactions. While some such enzymes support our digestion or can be used for the optimization of biotechnological processes, others may be harmful { e.g. mediating the roles of bacteria in human diseases.
    [Show full text]