DOCSLIB.ORG

Ergänzende Untersuchungen Zu Arten Und Lebensräumen Im Rahmen Der Erstellung Des Integrierten Strukturkonzeptes Für Den Münchner Nordosten

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ergänzende Untersuchungen Zu Arten Und Lebensräumen Im Rahmen Der Erstellung Des Integrierten Strukturkonzeptes Für Den Münchner Nordosten Ergänzende Untersuchungen zu Arten und Lebensräumen im Rahmen der Erstellung des integrierten Strukturkonzeptes für den Münchner Nordosten Kartierbericht Integrierte Fassung für das Gesamtgebiet der Bereiche SEM Nordost und M3 Bearbeitung: Prof. Schaller UmweltConsult GmbH Domagkstraße 1a 80807 München T 089 / 36040320 F 089 / 38038584 [email protected] Auftraggeberin: Landeshauptstadt München Referat für Stadtplanung und Bauordnung Blumenstraße 28b 80331 München München, 19.09.2018 xxx Projektleitung Dr. Johannes Gnädinger Bearbeitung Vegetation und Biotope Dr. Johannes Gnädinger M.Sc. Julia Kriner Fauna Brutvögel, Reptilien, Amphibien, Tagfalter und Heuschrecken Dipl.-Biol. Stefan Herrchen M.Sc. Julia Kriner Fledermäuse, Reptilien, Tagfalter und Heuschrecken M.Sc. Johannes Rehhausen Makrozoobenthos Dipl.-Biol. Christine Klingshirn Karten Dipl.-Ing. Christine Saala Alle Abbildungen (Bilder, Grafiken, Karten) in Haupttext und Anhang wurden durch die Prof. Schaller UmweltConsult GmbH oder ihre Subunternehmer erstellt, sofern nicht anders angegeben. xxx Arten und Lebensräume im Münchner Nordosten Verzeichnisse Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Einleitung .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Untersuchungsgebiet und Untersuchungszeiträume ................................................ 1 1.2 Untersuchungsflächen und Untersuchungsobjekte der ergänzenden Untersuchungen zu Arten und Lebensräumen ......................................................... 3 2 Erhebungen Vegetation und Biotope ............................................................. 5 2.1 Zu den vorangegangenen Kartierungen, Konzepten und Gutachten ........................ 5 2.2 Methoden ................................................................................................................. 7 2.3 Ergebnisse der Vegetations- und Biotopkartierung ................................................. 10 2.3.1 Gehölze 10 2.3.2 Grünland 13 2.3.3 Trockenstandorte 19 2.3.4 Feuchtstandorte 22 2.3.5 Sonstige Flächen 24 2.3.6 Zusammenfassung und Bewertung Vegetation und Biotope 26 3 Faunistische Erhebung ............................................................................... 30 3.1 Brutvogelerfassung ................................................................................................ 30 3.1.1 Methode 30 3.1.2 Ergebnisse der Brutvogelkartierung 34 3.1.3 Zusammenfassung und Bewertung Brutvögel 42 3.2 Fledermäuse .......................................................................................................... 43 3.2.1 Methode 43 3.2.2 Ergebnisse 44 3.2.3 Zusammenfassung und Bewertung Fledermäuse 51 3.3 Reptilien ................................................................................................................. 53 3.3.1 Methode 53 3.3.2 Ergebnisse 54 3.3.3 Beschreibung und Bedeutung der Probeflächen für die Reptilienfauna 54 3.3.4 Zusammenfassung und Bewertung Reptilien 61 3.4 Amphibien-Laichgewässerkartierung ...................................................................... 63 3.4.1 Methode 63 3.4.2 Ergebnisse der Amphibien-Laichgewässerkartierung 71 3.4.3 Beschreibung und Bedeutung der Probeflächen für die Amphibienfauna (SEM Nordost) 73 3.4.4 Beschreibung und Bedeutung der Probeflächen für die Amphibienfauna (M3) 81 3.4.5 Relevante Gewässer außerhalb des Untersuchungsgebiets (Gew. A, TT, TU, TV) 87 3.4.6 Zusammenfassung und Bewertung Amphibien 87 3.5 Tagfalter und Heuschrecken .................................................................................. 91 3.5.1 Methode 91 3.5.2 Ergebnisse Tagfaltererfassung 92 3.5.3 Ergebnisse Heuschreckenerfassung 96 3.5.4 Zusammenfassung und Bewertung Tagfalter und Heuschrecken 100 3.6 Makrozoobenthos ................................................................................................. 100 3.6.1 Methode 100 3.6.2 Ergebnis 102 3.6.3 Zusammenfassung und Bewertung Makrozoobenthos 105 Prof. Schaller UmweltConsult GmbH und Burkhardt l Engelmayer Landschaftsarchitekten Stadtplaner i Arten und Lebensräume im Münchner Nordosten Verzeichnisse 3.7 Zusammenfassung Fauna .................................................................................... 106 4 Literatur .................................................................................................... 112 5 Anhang ................................................................................................... extra Dokument Anhang zum Kartierbericht. Integrierte Fassung für das Gesamtgebiet der Bereiche SEM Nordost und M3. Prof. Schaller UmweltConsult GmbH. 11.04.2018. Tabellenverzeichnis Tabelle 1: Begangene Ausgleichsflächen im Untersuchungsgebiet .................................... 06 Tabelle 2: Kartierbereiche der Erfassung gehölzgebundener Brutvögel (Bereich SEM Nordost) ............................................................................................................. 32 Tabelle 3: Übersicht der Probeflächen im Bereich M3 ........................................................ 33 Tabelle 4: Übersicht der Ergebnisse der Brutvogelerfassung auf den Probeflächen ........... 39 Tabelle 5: Im Untersuchungsgebiet nachgewiesene Fledermausarten und -artkomplexe mit Anzahl der aufgezeichneten Rufsequenzen ................................................. 45 Tabelle 6: Anzahl aufgezeichneter Rufsequenzen in den einzelnen Kartierdurchgängen ... 46 Tabelle 7: Ausflug- und Schwärmbeobachtungen .............................................................. 49 Tabelle 8: Ergebnisse der Reptilienkartierung 2015 / 2016 mit Bedeutung der Probeflä- chen ................................................................................................................... 55 Tabelle 9: 2015 und 2016 untersuchte potenzielle Laichgewässer (Bereich SEM Nordost) 67 Tabelle 10: 2016 und 2017 untersuchte potenzielle Laichgewässer (Bereich M3) ................ 67 Tabelle 11: Zusätzlich qualitativ untersuchte bekannte Laichgewässer außerhalb des UG .. 68 Tabelle 12: Ergebnisse der Amphibien-Laichgewässerkartierung 2015-2017 mit Bedeu- tung der Probeflächen........................................................................................ 70 Tabelle 13: Artenspektrum der nachgewiesenen Tagfalter im Untersuchungsgebiet ............ 92 Tabelle 14: Artenspektrum der nachgewiesenen Heuschrecken auf den Probeflächen ........ 96 Tabelle 15: Saprobienindizes ............................................................................................. 102 Tabelle 16: Bewertungsrelevante Metrices nach WRRL ..................................................... 103 Abbildungsverzeichnis Abbildung 1: Kartierungsumgriff ............................................................................................ 2 Abbildung 2: „Verdichtungszonen“ und „Verdichtungskorridore“ von Biotopflächen im Untersuchungsgebiet ..................................................................................... 28 Abbildung 3: Einzelquartier von Zwerg- oder Rauhautfledermaus hinter einem Balken an der Ostfassade am Stall Nr. 8 des Galopper-Areals (von Trainer D. Ronge) .. 50 Abbildung 4: Untersuchungsgewässer der Amphibien-Erhebungen .................................... 66 Abbildung 5: Taxazahlen der vier bearbeiteten Probestellen (Hüllgraben und Renaturie- rungsstrecke) ............................................................................................... 101 Abbildung 6: Individuenzahlen/ m² der vier bearbeiteten Probestellen (Hüllgraben und Renaturierungsstrecke) ................................................................................ 101 Abbildung 7: Einteilung des Untersuchungsgebiets in fünf Bereiche ................................. 106 Prof. Schaller UmweltConsult GmbH und Burkhardt l Engelmayer Landschaftsarchitekten Stadtplaner ii xxx Arten und Lebensräume im Münchner Nordosten Einleitung 1 Einleitung Die Landeshauptstadt München erstellt derzeit ein integriertes Strukturkonzept zur Stadtentwicklung in ihrem Nordosten. Hierfür sind drei Planungsvarianten zur Siedlungsentwicklung aufgestellt wor- den. Für die Erschließung des Projektgebiets ist im Norden zudem eine neue Verkehrsanbindung erforderlich, welche als Anbindung an die Kreisstraße M3 erfolgen soll. Über lange Zeiträume hinweg haben sich Tiere und Pflanzen aufgrund unterschiedlichster Nutzun- gen und Lebensraumbedingungen im gesamten Planungsraum angesiedelt. Diese Bestände unter der Verwendung vorhandener Fachdaten im Gelände zu erheben, zu beschreiben und zu bewerten war Gegenstand der vorliegenden Untersuchung. 1.1 Untersuchungsgebiet und Untersuchungszeiträume Das Untersuchungsgebiet umfasst mit rund 600 ha Größe den eigentlichen Planungsraum für die Stadtentwicklung im Münchner Nordosten, genauer den Bereich östlich der S-Bahnlinie 8 (S8) und nördlich der Autobahn A94 bis zum Alten Bahndamm am Lebermoosweg im Norden sowie bis zum Dornacher Weg im Nordosten des Stadtgebietes (fortan in textlicher Kurzform als „Bereich SEM Nordost“ betitelt). Die Olympia-Reitanlage sowie das Galopper-Areal mit Rennbahn und Trainings- bahn sind Teil dieses Planungs- und Untersuchungsgebiets (vgl. Abbildung 1). Die naturschutzfach- lichen Kartierungen in diesem Bereich wurden in den Jahren 2014 bis 2016 durchgeführt. Mit der Biotop- und Nutzungstypenkartierung wurde im Sommer 2014 begonnen, die Erhebung der Biotope und Artengruppen erfolgte während des Jahres 2015. Im Sommer 2016 fanden ergänzende Nach- erhebungen zu Brutvögeln (Offenlandarten) und Amphibien (Schwerpunkt Wechselkröte und Laub- frosch) statt. Das
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jammu and Kashmir) of India Anu Bala*, J
    International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Studies (IJIMS), 2014, Vol 1, No.7, 24-34. 24 Available online at http://www.ijims.com ISSN: 2348 – 0343 Butterflies of family Pieridae reported from Jammu region (Jammu and Kashmir) of India Anu Bala*, J. S. Tara and Madhvi Gupta Department of Zoology, University of Jammu Jammu-180,006, India *Corresponding author: Anu Bala Abstract The present article incorporates detailed field observations of family Pieridae in Jammu region at different altitudes during spring, summer and autumn seasons of 2012-2013. The study revealed that 13 species of butterflies belonging to 10 genera of family Pieridae exist in the study area. Most members of Family Pieridae are white or yellow. Pieridae is a large family of butterflies with about 76 genera containing approximately 1,100 species mostly from tropical Africa and Asia. Keywords :Butterflies, India, Jammu, Pieridae. Introduction Jammu and Kashmir is the northernmost state of India. It consists of the district of Bhaderwah, Doda, Jammu, Kathua, Kishtwar, Poonch, Rajouri, Ramban, Reasi, Samba and Udhampur. Most of the area of the region is hilly and Pir Panjal range separates it from the Kashmir valley and part of the great Himalayas in the eastern districts of Doda and Kishtwar. The main river is Chenab. Jammu borders Kashmir to the north, Ladakh to the east and Himachal Pradesh and Punjab to the south. In east west, the line of control separates Jammu from the Pakistan region called POK. The climate of the region varies with altitude. The order Lepidoptera contains over 19,000 species of butterflies and 100,000 species of moths worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status and Distribution of Mediterranean Butterflies
    About IUCN IUCN is a membership Union composed of both government and civil society organisations. It harnesses the experience, resources and reach of its 1,300 Member organisations and the input of some 15,000 experts. IUCN is the global authority on the status of the natural world and the measures needed to safeguard it. www.iucn.org https://twitter.com/IUCN/ IUCN – The Species Survival Commission The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is the largest of IUCN’s six volunteer commissions with a global membership of more than 10,000 experts. SSC advises IUCN and its members on the wide range of technical and scientific aspects of species conservation and is dedicated to securing a future for biodiversity. SSC has significant input into the international agreements dealing with biodiversity conservation. http://www.iucn.org/theme/species/about/species-survival-commission-ssc IUCN – Global Species Programme The IUCN Species Programme supports the activities of the IUCN Species Survival Commission and individual Specialist Groups, as well as implementing global species conservation initiatives. It is an integral part of the IUCN Secretariat and is managed from IUCN’s international headquarters in Gland, Switzerland. The Species Programme includes a number of technical units covering Species Trade and Use, the IUCN Red List Unit, Freshwater Biodiversity Unit (all located in Cambridge, UK), the Global Biodiversity Assessment Initiative (located in Washington DC, USA), and the Marine Biodiversity Unit (located in Norfolk, Virginia, USA). www.iucn.org/species IUCN – Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation The Centre was opened in October 2001 with the core support of the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Environment, the regional Government of Junta de Andalucía and the Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation (AECID).
    [Show full text]
  • Marginal Range Expansion in a Host-Limited Butterfly Species
    Ecological Entomology (2000) 25, 165±170 Marginal range expansion in a host-limited butter¯y species Gonepteryx rhamni DAVID GUTIEÂ RREZ andCHRIS D. THOMAS Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation, School of Biology, University of Leeds, U.K. Abstract. 1. The British distribution of the butter¯y Gonepteryx rhamni (L.) follows closely the range of its natural host plants, Rhamnus catharticus L. and Frangula alnus Miller, suggesting that it is one of the few British butter¯ies that has a host-limited distribution. In North Wales, this species has its range margin, and it was recorded only occasionally in a 35-km2 area prior to the 1980s. Frangula alnus bushes were planted in the area in about 1986, allowing the hypothesis that G. rhamni would expand its range following increased host plant availability to be tested. 2. From 1996 to 1998, the distribution of the butter¯y and its host plants, R. catharticus (native), Rhamnus alaternus L. (introduced), and F. alnus (introduced to the area but native to Britain), was mapped in the study area. It was found that the butter¯y was more widespread than any of its host plants. Frangula alnus was the most widespread of the host plants, and received most eggs, suggesting that the carrying capacity of the habitat would have increased substantially following the planting of this species. Gonepteryx rhamni was able to complete its lifecycle on both introduced species in the study area. 3. A mark±release±recapture study showed that adult G. rhamni moved an average of 512 m, and 50% of movements were further than 400 m; these values are underestimates.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Butterfly Fauna of Kohat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
    Arthropods, 2012, 1(3):112-117 Article Checklist of butterfly fauna of Kohat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan Farzana Perveen, Ayaz Ahmad Department of Zoology, Hazara University, Garden Campus, Mansehra-21300, Pakistan E-mail: [email protected] Received 26 February 2012; Accepted 2 April 2012; Published online 5 September 2012 IAEES Abstract The butterflies play dual role, firstly as the pollinator, carries pollen from one flower to another and secondly their larvae act as the pest, injurious to various crops. Their 21 species were identified belonging to 3 different families from Kohat, Pakistan during September-December 2008. The reported families Namphalidae covered 33%, Papilionidae 10%, and Pieridae 57% biodiversity of butterflies of Kohat. In Namphalidae included: species belonging to subfamily Nymphalinae, Indian fritillary, Argynnis hyperbius Linnaeus; common castor, Ariadne merione (Cramer); painted lady, Cynthia cardui (Linnaeus); peacock pansy, Junonia almanac Linnaeus; blue pansy, J. orithya Linnaeus; common leopard, Phalantha phalantha (Drury); specie belonging to subfamily Satyrinae, white edged rock brown, Hipparchia parisatis (Kollar). In Papilionidae included: subfamily Papilioninae, lime butterfly, Papilio demoleus Linnaeus and common mormon, Pa. polytes Linnaeus. In Pieridae included: subfamily Coliaclinae, dark clouded yellow, Colias croceus (Geoffroy); subfamily Coliadinae, lemon emigrant, Catopsilia pomona Fabricius; little orange tip, C. etrida Boisduval; blue spot arab, Colotis protractus Butler; common grass yellow, Eumera hecab (Linnaeus); common brimstone, Gonepteryx rhamni (Linnaeus); yellow orange tip, Ixias pyrene Linnaeus; subfamily Pierinae, pioneer white butterfly, Belenoi aurota Bingham; Murree green-veined white, Pieris ajaka Moore; large cabbage white, P. brassicae Linnaeus; green-veined white, P. napi (Linnaeus); small cabbage white, P. rapae Linnaeus. The wingspan of collected butterflies, minimum was 25 mm of C.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen Vision, Pigments and Structural Colouration
    University of Groningen Vision, pigments and structural colouration of butterflies Pirih, Primož IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2011 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Pirih, P. (2011). Vision, pigments and structural colouration of butterflies. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 02-10-2021 Chapter 7 Spatial reflection patterns of iridescent pierid butterfly wings and the dependence of visibility on scale curvature Abstract The males of many pierid butterflies have iridescent wings, which presumably function in intraspecific communication.
    [Show full text]
  • Coenonympha Oedippus (FABRICIUS, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Slovenia 7 Tatjana Celik & Rudi Verovnik
    Editorial: Oedippus in Oedippus 5 26 (2010) Matthias Dolek, Christian Stettmer, Markus Bräu & Josef Settele Distribution, habitat preferences and population ecology of the False Ringlet Coenonympha oedippus (FABRICIUS, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Slovenia 7 Tatjana Celik & Rudi Verovnik False Ringlet Coenonympha oedippus (FABRICIUS, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Croatia: current status, population dynamics and conservation management 16 Martina Šašić False Ringlet Coenonympha oedippus (FABRICIUS, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Poland: state of knowledge and conservation prospects 20 Marcin Sielezniew, Krzysztof Pałka, Wiaczesław Michalczuk, Cezary Bystrowski, Marek Hołowiński & Marek Czerwiński Ecology of Coenonympha oedippus (FABRICIUS, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Italy 25 Simona Bonelli, Sara Canterino & Emilio Balletto Structure and size of a threatened population of the False Ringlet Coenonympha oedippus (FABRICIUS, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Hungary 31 Noémi Örvössy, Ágnes Vozár, Ádám Kőrösi, Péter Batáry & László Peregovits Concerning the situation of the False Ringlet Coenonympha oedippus (FABRICIUS, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Switzerland 38 Goran Dušej, Emmanuel Wermeille, Gilles Carron & Heiner Ziegler Habitat requirements, larval development and food preferences of the German population of the False Ringlet Coenonympha oedippus (FABRICIUS, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) – Research on the ecological needs to develop management tools 41 Markus Bräu, Matthias Dolek & Christian Stettmer
    [Show full text]
  • 8 SKYLARKS Factsheet Butterflies (For Print).Pdf
    zone 5 Red admiral butterfflliesfl Vanessa atalanta easy to find Dark chocolate with a fiery red ribbon Skylarks Nature Reserve emblazoned across each upper wing makes this one of our most handsome and distinguished insects. Migrating zone ©Chris Bradbury from North Africa and Southern 4, 5 Europe the female will then lay her eggs here when a fresh batch of butterflies emerge in July and can be seen up until late OnFind creeping me thistle November. in late summer and ©John Black flowering Ivy in the autumn. Common blue Polyommatus icarus A distinctly lack lustre title for one with such Peacock sparkle. The male’s brilliant iridescent violet- Aglais io blue wings finely edged in black with a white When the wings are folded up it can resemble a dead zone margin, play in stark contrast to the female 3 leaf, but when opened, often with a hiss made by whose wings are brown, edged with orange the wings rubbing together, the striking signature dots with a dusting of blue eye patterns are revealed, with a dazzling palette of close to and over the body. red, purple, blue and InFind late summer, me honey suckle yellow. roosting head These eye patterns are down on grass OnFind knapweed, me teasel and thought to startle any stems in meadows. creeping thistle in summer, would be predator. willow blossom in spring or even basking in the first warm sun of February. ©Sean Browne zone 1, 3, 5 Comma Polygonia c-album With ragged scalloped edges to the wings, butterfflhard toliesfl find that when opened give this delicate butterfly Skylarks Nature Reserve the appearance of a small tortoiseshell that has been pecked at by a bird.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioscore 2: Potential Distribution of Butterflies and Assessment of Environmental Pressures in Europe
    Bioscore 2: Potential distribution of butterflies and assessment of environmental pressures in Europe Bioscore 2: Potential distribution of butterflies and assessment of environmental pressures in Europe Text Chris van Swaay, Oliver Schweiger, Josef Settele, Elisabeth Kühn, Alexander Harpke, Martin Wiemers, Martin Musche, Guy Pe’er, Constanti Stefanescu, Benoit Fontaine, Romain Julliard, David Roy, Tom Brereton, Lars B. Pettersson, Mikko Kuussaari, Janne Heliola, Reto Schmucki Reportnumber VS2014.003 Production De Vlinderstichting Butterfly Conservation Europe Mennonietenweg 10 P.O. Box 506 Postbus 506 NL-6700 AM Wageningen 6700 AM Wageningen E [email protected] T 0317 46 73 46 www.bc-europe.eu E [email protected] www.vlinderstichting.nl Commisioned by Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving Jaap Wiertz, Arjen Hinsberg, Onno Knol, Marjon Hendrikx Preferred citation Van Swaay, C.A.M., Schweiger, O., Settele, J., Kühn, E., Harpke, A., Wiemers, M., Musche, M., Pe’er, G., Stefanescu, C., Fontaine, B., Julliard, R., Roy, D., Brereton, T., Pettersson, L.B., Kuussaari, M., Heliola, J., Schmucki, R. (2014) Bioscore 2: Potential distribution of butterflies and assessment of environmental pressures in Europe. Report VS2014.003, De Vlinderstichting, Wageningen & Butterfly Conservation Europe December 2014 Revised version September 2015 Niets uit deze uitgave mag worden verveelvoudigden/of openbaar gemaakt d.m.v. druk, fotokopie, microfilm of op welke andere wijze dan ook zonder voorafgaande toestemming van De Vlinderstichting, noch mag het zonder
    [Show full text]
  • Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera)
    Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera) Nature and Environment, No. 99 Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera) Chris van SWAAY Dutch Butterfly Conservation, Wageningen, The Netherlands and Martin WARREN British Butterfly Conservation, Wareham, United Kingdom Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats Nature and Environment, No. 99 Council of Europe Publishing Production: Dutch Butterfly Conservation British Butterfly Conservation De Vlinderstichting P.O. Box 444 P.O. Box 506 Wareham NL-6700 AM Wageningen Dorset BH20 5YA The Netherlands United Kingdom tel.: +31-317-467346 tel.: +44-1929-400209 fax: +31-317-420296 fax: +44-1929-400210 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] homepage: http://www.bos.nl/vlinderstichting Financial support: Council of Europe English Nature Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries, Directorate for Nature Management of The Netherlands Citation: Van Swaay, C.A.M. & Warren, M.S. (1999) Red Data book of European butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and Environment, No. 99, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg. The British Butterfly Conservation Society Ltd. is registered in England no. 2206468, charity no. 254937 CONTENTS Executive summary ............................................ 7 Part I: Analysis and overview 1. Introduction ............................................... 12 2. Methods and criteria ........................................ 13 2.1 Collection of distribution and trend data ................... 13 2.2
    [Show full text]
  • The Flight Phenological Responses of Lepidoptera to Climate Change in Britain and Germany (Insecta, Lepidoptera) by J O H N F
    ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (August 2003) 3 4 {1/2):3-16, Wurzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 The flight phenological responses of Lepidoptera to climate change in Britain and Germany (Insecta, Lepidoptera) by J o h n F. Burton & T im H. Sparks received 15.111.2003 S um m ary: This paper is a revised and updated version of one published in the journal British Wildlife (Burton & S parks , 2002). It incorporates analyses of additional phenological data concerning German Lepidoptera extracted from records of a selection of migrant and partially migrant species published annually in Atalanta. Some comparisons are therefore possible be­ tween the influence of recent climate changes on Lepidoptera in southern Britain and Ger­ many. The British data, much of it encompassing the period 1940-1999, indicates that butterfly species overwintering in Britain in any stage of their life cycle were appearing earlier in the 1990s compared with both the 1940s and the 1970s by an average of 28 days (Table 1). In contrast the German data, encompassing the period 1960-1999, indicate that such over­ wintering species were appearing earlier by an average of eight days compared with the 1960s and by 12 days compared with the 1970s (Table 3). A comparison between the 1990s and 1970s for four species of butterflies overwintering in both countries in the imago stage (Gonepteryx rhamni (L., 1758), Vanessa atalanta (L., 1758), Inachis io (L., 1758) and Aglais urticae (L., 1758)) indicated that they were appearing earlier by an average of 74 days (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • 218 a New Subspecies of Gonepteryx Rhamni From
    218 JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY A NEW SUBSPECIES OF GONEPTERYX RHAMNI FROM TIAN-SHAN MOUNTAINS, U.S.S.R. YURI P. NEKRUTENKO P.O. Box .324/47, Kiev 1, Ukraine, U.S.S.R. When compiling the recent monograph of the genus Goneptel'Yx (Nekrutenko, 1968), I felt the lack of material from arcas surrounding the great mountains of Asia, and some gaps still remain in the geographical scope of this survey. Consideration of modest amount of material avail­ able from Tibet and the Himalayas showed this area to be a center of sub specific diversity of Gonepteryx l'hamni (L.). However, there was no material from the neighboring mountain areas of Pamir and Tian-Shan, so that trends in the geographic variation of G. rhamni could not be detected. This paper is based on material kindly collected on my request by Dmitri S. Lastochkin of Kiev. Examination of these specimens showed that in the Tian-Shan Mountains, or more exactly, in Alma-Ata vicinity, occurs a population of distinctive individuals which I now describe as a new subspecies. Gonepteryx rhamni tianshanica Nekrutenko, new subspecies Decidedly larger than specimens of nomenotypic race from Scandi­ navia and adjoining areas of western Siberia (alar expanse 55-60 mm versus 40-50 mm in G. rhamni rhamni) . Male: Ground color bright, vivid, lemon-yellow; orange discal spots large, about 2 mm in diameter, easily recognizable. Hairs on thorax and abdomen whitish, brighter than in C. rhamni rhamni. Underside of wings yellow, silky-smooth. Superficially very close to C. rhamni transiens Verity of southern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Gonepteryx Maderensis, Madeiran Brimstone
    The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ ISSN 2307-8235 (online) IUCN 2008: T39485A10228166 Gonepteryx maderensis, Madeiran Brimstone Assessment by: van Swaay, C., Wynhoff, I., Verovnik, R., Wiemers, M., López Munguira, M., Maes, D., Sasic, M., Verstrael, T., Warren, M. & Settele, J. View on www.iucnredlist.org Citation: van Swaay, C., Wynhoff, I., Verovnik, R., Wiemers, M., López Munguira, M., Maes, D., Sasic, M., Verstrael, T., Warren, M. & Settele, J. 2010. Gonepteryx maderensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2010: e.T39485A10228166. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2010- 1.RLTS.T39485A10228166.en Copyright: © 2015 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale, reposting or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder. For further details see Terms of Use. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species Programme, the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership. The IUCN Red List Partners are: BirdLife International; Botanic Gardens Conservation International; Conservation International; Microsoft; NatureServe; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sapienza University of Rome; Texas A&M University; Wildscreen; and Zoological Society of London. If
    [Show full text]