DOCSLIB.ORG

The CIA and “Uncle Louie”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The CIA and “Uncle Louie” The CIA and “Uncle Louie” How alleged Ukrainian war criminal Mykola Lebed ended up publishing Agency-funded propaganda in the US Mykola Lebed was sentenced to death in Poland in 1934. He died in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania in 1998. By various accounts, he was an assassin, a freedom fighter, a terrorist, a hero, a villain, a prisoner, a refugee, a Nazi collaborator, a Nazi target, a writer, and a war criminal. To the Central Intelligence Agency, which bankrolled his activities for close to half a century, he was known as “Uncle Louie.” Lebed was one of the leaders of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists. Referred to by some as a terrorist group and by others as freedom fighters, the OUN and its subsidiaries were accused not only of political assassinations in Poland, but also of ethnic cleansing in Ukraine during the mid-20th century. In 1934, along with several other OUN members, Lebed was sentenced to death for the murder of Polish official Bronisław Pieracki. The sentence was commuted in 1936 to lifetime imprisonment, and Lebed managed to escape prison during the the German invasion of Poland in 1939. In 1940, The OUN split into two factions: the OUN-B for loyalists of Stepan Bandera, and the OUN-M for followers of Andrei Melnik. Lebed was a leader of the Bandera group. Both factions of the OUN sided with the Nazis to some extent. Melnik aimed to be friendly with the Nazis in hopes that after the war Ukraine would emerge an independent nation. Bandera was more keen on forcefully creating an ethnically homogenous, independent Ukrainian state with himself as the leader of it. By most accounts, OUN collaboration with the Nazis was opportunistic. They were groups at odds, but had a perceived common enemy. The OUN’s determination for an ethnically Ukrainian nation was not dissimilar to Nazi ideology, insofar as both aimed to remove ethnically Jewish and Polish people from their communities. Both were willing to obtain that objective by any means necessary, be it forced relocation or murder. After his escape from prison, Lebed trained at a Gestapo police school in Zakopane. Exactly how long he spent there is unknown. Lebed admitted to being at Zakopane for about five weeks, but other accounts place him there for several months. “From Krakow, still on instructions from [an OUN Leadership Council] member, I went to another rest camp in Zakopane. Discovering on the spot that this “rest camp” was under the control of the German police, and that it was to be converted into a police school, I left it, freeing at the same time from camp control a group of people, using various pretexts,” Lebed declared in a 1952 questionnaire. While Lebed described his actions at Zakopane as almost heroic, a fellow trainee recalled Lebed’s behaviour at Zakopane much differently. A 1986 Village Voice article relayed Mykyta Kosakivs’kyy’s account of Lebed enthusiastically kidnapping and torturing a man as part of his training. The Nazis sent Bandera to Sachsenhausen concentration camp in 1942 after he declared Ukraine an independent state. Lebed became the de facto leader of the Bandera faction, which largely controlled the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA), through the end of the war. Over the following few years, the UPA was responsible for tens of thousands of murders. After the end of World War II, Western intelligence agencies sought to acquire OUN members as informants and infiltrators. The OUN was avowedly anti-Communist, and it already had a network of trained guerilla fighters at the ready for an anticipated Soviet offensive. The United Kingdom’s MI6, their analogue to the CIA, opted to work with the Bandera, who later died under mysterious circumstances, allegedly murdered by the KGB. The CIA chose to work with Lebed, then the Foreign Minister of the Ukrainian Supreme Liberation Council (UHVR). Lebed still had considerable influence among Ukrainian nationalists. Bandera was too extreme and his following, the CIA concluded, was dwindling. The early CIA accounts of Lebed reveal the agency believed he and his comrades were “determined and able men, but with the psychology of the hunted … resolved to carry on their work with or without us, and If necessary against us.” The CIA knew early on of Lebed’s conviction for assassination, his training at Zakopane, and his one-time control over the OUN-B, but documents show the agency believed it to be lies peddled by Soviets or Melnik loyalists. Later, the CIA shielded Lebed from allegations and deportation because he was too valuable of an asset and any publicity could compromise the entire project . The CIA’s defense of Lebed essentially boiled down to that Lebed was never a member of the Nazi party. But, Lebed had a complex history. While the reports that Lebed was a Nazi were likely incorrect (technically), and indeed, there was at one point a Nazi warrant for his arrest … but in one of the CIA’s own hair-splitting denials that Lebed was a Nazi, it admits that Lebed was the top leader of the “anti-soviet Ukrainian resistance movement” during some of its most violent time - a time when swaths ethically non-Ukrainian populations were systematically murdered by that movement’s proponents. Lebed was perhaps not a member of the Nazi party, but by many accounts he espoused the values of Nazism. Among the criteria used in the CIA’s analysis of various Ukrainian groups were that “the support of the groups by the United States could feasibly remain clandestine and work to the detriment of the present Russian government and its military potential” and that “the political and ideological program of the group is one which the United States would not be embarrassed to support.” Lebed fit the bill, a report concluded. The CIA facilitated Lebed’s move to the US, getting asylum for him and his family in 1949 and helping him obtain citizenship in 1957. As head of a CIA operation called Project AERODYNAMIC, Lebed spent the next few decades in control of a Agency-funded non- profit publishing company, the Prolog Research and Publishing Association. His salary at that company in 1967, for example, was $11,970. That’s roughly equivalent to $91,700 in today’s terms according to the Bureau of Labor and Statistics. His job was to spread anti-Soviet, anti-Communist propaganda in Ukraine. However, some publications were also distributed within the US - a knowing violation of laws against domestic distribution of propaganda. Prolog Research and Publishing Association reincorporated in 1967 as a for-profit named the Prolog Research Corporation. The reorganization was in response to new regulations introduced by the Katzenbach Committee, according to an agency memorandum. Although the policy recommended by the committee were specifically aimed at prohibiting the kind of work done by Lebed and Project AERODYNAMIC, the CIA quickly discovered a loophole - the publications could be printed somewhere other than on US soil. (This wouldn’t be the last time the Agency would “terminate” a program, only to move it abroad.) Project AERODYNAMIC was dissolved and its front company, Prolog Research and Publishing Association, shut down. But the self-described propaganda campaign continued under the new names QRDYNAMIC and Prolog Research Corporation. Despite the turmoil for the Agency in the ‘70s caused by the Church and Pike Committees, Lebed and QRDYNAMIC continued their work throughout the decade without incident. When trouble did come, however, it came from an unlikely source - the famously CIA- friendly Reagan administration. Often credited for the expansion of government surveillance and data collection, President Ronald Reagan’s Executive Order 12333 in 1981 also added regulations regarding how intelligence agencies can influence entities within the US. The order states that “no one acting on behalf of agencies within the Intelligence Community may join or otherwise participate in any organization in the United States on behalf of any agency within the Intelligence Community without disclosing his intelligence affiliation to appropriate officials of the organization. … No such participation may be undertaken for the purpose of influencing the activity of the organization or its members [with a few exceptions].” An audit of QRPLUMB, a cryptonym of Prolog, concluded in 1991 that the project had violated E.O. 12333 by distributing CIA-funded propaganda in the US. Among the 24 U.S.- based subscribers acknowledged in the audit and contemporary internal communications were “Harvard and some Ukrainian church-affiliated groups.” The auditors made no suggestion to remedy to problem: “QRPLUMB was terminated 30 September 1990; therefore, we are not making any recommendations concerning QRPLUMB.” (This was not the first time the Agency would escape consequences for engaging in illegal activities.) Possibly driven by widespread press criticism in the mid-’80s, QRDYNAMIC officially ended in 1990 (though some accounts claim it ran through 1991), and Lebed died eight years later, You can explore his nearly 50 years of association with the Agency via the timeline below. [status draft] [nogallery] [geotag on] [publicize off|twitter|facebook] [category istihbarat] [tags CIA FILES, The CIA, Uncle Louie] .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Émigrés and Anglo-American Intelligence Operations in the Early Cold War Cacciatore, F
    WestminsterResearch http://www.westminster.ac.uk/westminsterresearch “Their Need Was Great”: Émigrés and Anglo-American Intelligence Operations in the Early Cold War Cacciatore, F. This is an electronic version of a PhD thesis awarded by the University of Westminster. © Mr Francesco Cacciatore, 2018. The WestminsterResearch online digital archive at the University of Westminster aims to make the research output of the University available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the authors and/or copyright owners. Whilst further distribution of specific materials from within this archive is forbidden, you may freely distribute the URL of WestminsterResearch: ((http://westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk/). In case of abuse or copyright appearing without permission e-mail [email protected] “Their Need Was Great”: Émigrés and Anglo-American Intelligence Operations in the Early Cold War Francesco Alexander Cacciatore March 2018 A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Westminster for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Abstract Covert action during the Cold War has been the subject of much historiography. This research, however, is based for the most part on primary sources, specifically on the records declassified in the United States in 2007 as a consequence of the Nazi War Crimes Disclosure Act. The majority of the historiography on this topic either predates or neglects these records. The study of covert operations inside the Iron Curtain during the early Cold War, sponsored by Western states using émigré agents, usually ends with the conclusion that these operations were a failure, both in operational terms and from the point of view of the intelligence gathered.
    [Show full text]
  • The Causes of Ukrainian-Polish Ethnic Cleansing 1943 Author(S): Timothy Snyder Source: Past & Present, No
    The Past and Present Society The Causes of Ukrainian-Polish Ethnic Cleansing 1943 Author(s): Timothy Snyder Source: Past & Present, No. 179 (May, 2003), pp. 197-234 Published by: Oxford University Press on behalf of The Past and Present Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3600827 . Accessed: 05/01/2014 17:29 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Oxford University Press and The Past and Present Society are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Past &Present. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 137.110.33.183 on Sun, 5 Jan 2014 17:29:27 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions THE CAUSES OF UKRAINIAN-POLISH ETHNIC CLEANSING 1943* Ethniccleansing hides in the shadow of the Holocaust. Even as horrorof Hitler'sFinal Solution motivates the study of other massatrocities, the totality of its exterminatory intention limits thevalue of the comparisons it elicits.Other policies of mass nationalviolence - the Turkish'massacre' of Armenians beginningin 1915, the Greco-Turkish'exchanges' of 1923, Stalin'sdeportation of nine Soviet nations beginning in 1935, Hitler'sexpulsion of Poles and Jewsfrom his enlargedReich after1939, and the forcedflight of Germans fromeastern Europein 1945 - havebeen retrievedfrom the margins of mili- tary and diplomatichistory.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report of the Nazi War Crimes & Japanese
    Nazi War Crimes & Japanese Imperial Government Records Interagency Working Group Final Report to the United States Congress April 2007 Nazi War Crimes and Japanese Imperial Government Records Interagency Working Group Final Report to the United States Congress Published April 2007 1-880875-30-6 “In a world of conflict, a world of victims and executioners, it is the job of thinking people not to be on the side of the executioners.” — Albert Camus iv IWG Membership Allen Weinstein, Archivist of the United States, Chair Thomas H. Baer, Public Member Richard Ben-Veniste, Public Member Elizabeth Holtzman, Public Member Historian of the Department of State The Secretary of Defense The Attorney General Director of the Central Intelligence Agency Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation National Security Council Director of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum Nationa5lrchives ~~ \T,I "I, I I I"" April 2007 I am pleased to present to Congress. Ihe AdnllniSlr:lllon, and the Amcncan [JeOplc Ihe Final Report of the Nazi War Crimes and Japanese Imperial Government Rcrords Interagency Working Group (IWG). The lWG has no\\ successfully completed the work mandated by the Nazi War Crimes Disclosure Act (P.L. 105-246) and the Japanese Imperial Government DisdoSUTC Act (PL 106·567). Over 8.5 million pages of records relaH:d 10 Japanese and Nazi "'ar crimes have been identifIed among Federal Go\emmelll records and opened to the pubhc. including certam types of records nevcr before released. such as CIA operational Iiles. The groundbrcaking release of Lhcse ft:cords In no way threatens lhe Malio,,'s sccurily.
    [Show full text]
  • Secret Derived -From Secret
    :SEW NAZI WAR CRIMES DISCLOSURE ACT QUESTIONNAIRE SUBMITTED TO MR. LEBED IN CONNECTION WITH CLEARING HIS NAME WITH IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE [8 APRIL 1952] rItital r uVt5iSkst: tY I. BIOGRAPHIC DATA 1. Date and Place of Birth (A) I was born on 23 November 1909 (baptised on 11 Decem- ber) in a little town Strilyska Novi, now known as Strilychi Novi, the rayon center of Drohobych Oblast. e=it fr;,N-L1 2. Family Background -- Give Details Regarding Agel. Eaml Education, Occu ation Political Activities Socio-Economic Status, Etc. afa gagE: a. Father: (A) Mykhaylo, about 67 years old. ArEgsat a.4111 in 1947 in the Rohatyn district at his friends farmstead. Oli051 Alm fate is not known. My father completed four years of primaft, Tia t-,4t. In school and three years of vocational school. Occupation: pmnots farmer-beekeeper; also tailor in his free time. Not a party041 PLihJi member; a nationally-conscious Ukrainian. His socio-economi -1747, 4 level, given the economic conditions in Western Ukraine--a mid-level peasant. b. Mother: (A) Kateryna nee Mazovsky, died in 1944 immediately after the arrest by the Gestapo of my wife, daughter, DECLASSIFIED AND RELEASED BY CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY SOURCESMETHODS EXEMPTION3B2B (A) = Mr. Lebeds answers to the QuestionnaireNAZI WAR CRIMESDISCLOSUREACT DATE 2003 2005 [] = Editors explanatory terms. ..1.10114C.N. WARNING NOTICE Ctrat It INTELLIGENCE SOURCES um OR METHODS INVOLVED ,SECRET DERIVED -FROM SECRET and family. She was about 55 years old. By birth, on her fathers side, my mother was of Polish discent. Her father was a Roman Catholic and was descended from the Polish yeomanry [nobility]; he was Ukrainianized.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Norman J.W
    Introduction Norman J.W. Goda E The examination of legal proceedings related to Nazi Germany’s war and the Holocaust has expanded signifi cantly in the past two decades. It was not always so. Though the Trial of the Major War Criminals at Nuremberg in 1945–1946 generated signifi cant scholarly literature, most of it, at least in the trial’s immediate aftermath, concerned legal scholars’ judgments of the trial’s effi cacy from a strictly legalistic perspective. Was the four-power trial based on ex post facto law and thus problematic for that reason, or did it provide the best possible due process to the defendants under the circumstances?1 Cold War political wrangl ing over the subsequent Allied trials in the western German occupation zones as well as the sentences that they pronounced generated a discourse that was far more critical of the tri- als than laudatory.2 Historians, meanwhile, used the records assembled at Nuremberg as an entrée into other captured German records as they wrote initial studies of the Third Reich, these focusing mainly on foreign policy and wartime strategy, though also to some degree on the Final Solution to the Jewish Question.3 But they did not historicize the trial, nor any of subsequent trials, as such. Studies that analyzed the postwar proceedings in and of themselves from a historical perspective developed only three de- cades after Nuremberg, and they focused mainly on the origins of the initial, groundbreaking trial.4 Matters changed in the 1990s for a number of reasons. The fi rst was late- and post-Cold War interest among historians of Germany, and of other nations too, in Vergangenheitsbewältigung—the political, social, and intellectual attempt to confront, or to sidestep, the criminal wartime past.
    [Show full text]
  • Eugenics and Racial Anthropology in the Ukrainian Radical Nationalist Tradition
    Science in Context (2019), 32,67–91 doi:10.1017/S0269889719000048 RESEARCH ARTICLE Eugenics and racial anthropology in the Ukrainian radical nationalist tradition Per Anders Rudling Lund University, Lund, Sweden and National University of Singapore, Singapore Emails: [email protected], [email protected] Argument Eugenics and race played significant roles in Ukrainian interwar nationalism, yet remain largely unstudied. The Ukrainian nationalists’ understanding of the racial makeup of their imagined community was contradictory as they struggled to reconcile their desire for racial “purity” with the realities of significant variations between the populations inhabiting the enormous territories which they sought to include in their intended state project. The “turn to the right” over the 1930s placed an increased onus on race, and eugenics came to occupy an increasingly prominent place in Ukrainian radical nationalism from around 1936. In 1941, the leading Ukrainian far-right organization, the OUN had developed a project for eugenic engineering, for their aborted state, declared in L’viv on June 30, 1941. Racial conceptualiza- tions of the Ukrainian community figured prominently well into the Cold War era, gaining a new actuality and meaning in an émigré community dispersed across several countries. Keywords: Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists; eugenics; race; Teodosius Dobzhansky; Iaroslav Stets’ko; Dmytro Dontsov; anti-Semitism Introduction Only in recent years has the intellectual history of eugenics in Eastern Europe become the sub- ject of a more systematic academic inquiry. A number of important studies have significantly expanded our understanding of eugenic thought in the European states that emerged following the collapse of the multiethnic empires at the end of World War I (Turda and Weindling 2007; Boskovic and Hann 2013; Felder and Weindling 2013; Turda 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Sol Littman Fonds
    Library and Archives Bibliothèque et archives Canada Canada Political and Social Division du patrimoine Heritage Division politique et social SOL LITTMAN FONDS R2958 Finding Aid No. 2386 / Instrument de recherche no 2386 Prepared in 2005 by L. Tapper of the Social Préparé en 2005 par L. Tapper de la Section Archives Section des Archives sociales ii TABLE OF CONTENTS MICROFILM SHELF LIST .................................................... iii HELMUT RAUCA and RELATED MATERIAL SERIES .............................1 WAR CRIMES INCLUDING THE UKRAINIAN14TH WAFFEN-SS DIVISION SERIES . 7, 76 SUSPECTED WAR CRIMINAL CASE FILES .................................43, 75 HOLOCAUST DENIAL and HISTORICAL REVISIONISM SERIES...................51 LITTMAN’S PUBLICATIONS, ARTICLES, SPEECHES and NOTEBOOKS ............57 RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS and ARTICLES SERIES.............................61 iii WAR CRIMES INCLUDING THE UKRAINIAN 14th WAFFEN-SS DIVISION MICROFILM SHELF LIST M-8842 The records of the Reich Leader of the SS and Chief of German Police (Reichsführer SS und Chef der Deutschen Polizei). Published by the American Historical Association and General Services Administration, Washington, 1958 (Ref.: microfilm T175, roll 74) M-8843 Group XV, Ordner 439: (Der ress an SS-O’ Gruf Berger, 2/5/1944) Miscellaneous Non-Biographical Material (Schumacher Material). Published by the American Historical Association and General Services Administration, Washington, 1958 (Ref.: microfilm T580, roll 89) M-8844 Records of German Field Commands Panzer Armies, 1944. Published by the American Historical Association for the Study Of War document, Washington, 1960 (incomplete copy) (Ref.: microfilm T-313, roll 400) M-8845 Records of German Field Commands Panzer Armies, 1944. Published by the American Historical Association for the Study Of War document, Washington, 1960. (Ref.: microfilm T-313, roll 401) M-8846 Records of German Field Commands Panzer Armies, 1944.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 1956
    Dedicated to the ideal* Address and interests of young Americans of Ukrainian UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SECTION descent 81-83 Grand Street Informative, ' instructive. Supplemena of Jersey City 3. N. J. Ukrainian Daily Svoboda УКРАЇНСЬКИЙ щоА&шиш UKRAINIAN DA1LV Tel. HEnderson 4-0237 Pubbshed by the Ukrainian National Ukrainian National Ass'n Association. The Ukrainian Weekly Section Tel. HEnderson 5-8740 РПС ЬХШ 4. 143 SECTION TWO SVOBODA, UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SECTION, SATURDAY, JULY 28, 1956 SECTION TWO No. 143 VOL. LXin UKRAINIAN PRISONERS IN SOVIET SLAVE LABOR REPUBLICAN NATIONALITIES DIVISION Ukrainian American Veterans J OPENING OF UKRAINIAN *""" J-- -jV ". "'•• ' -^"Цчі CAMPS DEMAND THEIR "ENDOWED RIGHTS" CULTURAL COURSES Support Immigration Legislation Wednesday, August 1st IN A SMUGGLED LETTER TO THE UN At a meeting of the National oue legislation now pending in .vill mark the formal open­ Executive Board of the Uk­ Washington, Resolution HR- ing of the Ukrainian Cul­ (Text in ТОГО Appears on Page 2 and 3) rainian American Veterans 6888 was discussed in its'en­ tural Courses for the Uk- held on Friday, July 20th, at tirety. NEW YORK. — On Monday, and refugees in the free world. rainin American youth con- kuta and Colonies 1 and 3 in the Ukrainian Institute in New A report Was made on the July 23, 1956, at 3:00 P.M., the These documents reveal the ducted under the auspices Kingir, and in the camps of York, following a report by its action taken by the Joint Uk­ Ukrainian Congress Commit­ continuity of slave labor prac­ of the Ukrainian National Vorkuta, Norilsk in 1953 and National Legislative Officer, rainian American Immigration tee of America sponsored a tice and barbaric mistreatment Association at "Soyuzivka" in Karaganda in 1954).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Ethnic Cleansing, Genocide Or Ukrainian-Polish War in Volhynia?
    Ethnic Cleansing, Genocide or Ukrainian-Polish War in Volhynia?1 Ivan Katchanovski, Ph.D. School of Political Studies & Conflict Studies and Human Rights Program University of Ottawa Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada Tel. 613-407-1295 [email protected] Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 10-13, 2020 1 Abstract This paper analyzes the mass murder of Poles in Volhynia in Western Ukraine during World War II. The mass murder of Poles by the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) and the Stepan Bandera faction of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN-B) during the German occupation of Volhynia in 1943 became an important political issue in Poland and Ukraine after the collapse of communism, especially in the last fews years. Previous studies by Polish, Ukrainian, and Western researchers offered different and often divergent theories of this historical event. It is often presented in Ukraine as a Ukrainian-Polish war, in particular, by the Ukrainian Institute of National Memory after the “Euromaidan”. The laws and policies adopted by the Maidan governments glorified the far right OUN and the UPA, their leaders and members as national heroes and fighters for the Ukrainian independence. In contrast, the mass murder of Poles in Volhynia is often characterized in Poland as a genocide. The Polish parliament declared in 2016 that the Volhynian massacre constituted a genocide. The research question is whether this mass murder was an ethnic cleansing, genocide, or Ukrainian-Polish war. This study analyzes archival documents from the Branch Archive of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), the Central State Archives of Supreme Bodies of Power and Government of Ukraine, the SBU archive in Volyn Region, and the State Archive of Volyn Region, historical studies, and eyewitness accounts in English, Polish, Russian, and Ukrainian languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Warfare Or War Criminality?
    Per Anders Rudling, Warfare or War Criminality? Per Anders RUDLING WARFARE OR WAR CRIMINALITY? volodymyr v’iatrovych, DRUHA POL’S’KO-UKAINS’KA VIINA, 1942–1947 (kyiv: vydavnychyi dim “kyEvo-mohylianS’ka akadEmiia,” 2011). 228 pp. iSBn: 978-966-518-567* The third president of Ukraine, Viktor Yushchenko (2005–10) made the instrumentalization of history a cornerstone of his legacy. The president established institutions of memory management and myth production as- signing other government agencies propaganda duties. One of these was the former KGB archive (now known as the SBU archive). For a couple of years its director, the young historian Volodymyr V’iatrovych (born 1977) became a key figure of Yushchenko’s Geschichtspolitik. As such, he was directly involved in memory production, but also had a direct influence on who got access to the collections.1 Yushchenko’s legitimizing historians presented a narrative of suffering, resistance, and redemption, in which a * The author wishes to thank Tarik Cyril Amar, Delphine Bechtel, Sofia Dyak, John-Paul Himka, Ivan Kachanovski, Jared McBride, and Grzegorz Rossoliński-Liebe. 1 Vasyl’ Rasevych. Zamknute kolo ‘spetsial’noi’ ukrains’koi istorii // Zaxid.net.13.09.2010. http://zaxid.net/article/74357 (Last accessed: September 16, 2010); Sofia Grachova. Un- known Victims: Ethnic-Based Violence of the World War II Era in Ukrainian Politics of History after 2004 / Paper presented at the Fourth Annual Danyliw Research Seminar in Contemporary Ukrainian Studies, Chair of Ukrainian Studies, University of Ottawa, October 23–25, 2008. 356 Ab Imperio, 1/2012 heroic representation of the Bandera wing of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN[b]) and the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) were key components.2 V’iatrovych externalizes Soviet rule as a genocidal occupation against which the Ukrainian people conducted a heroic resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Krzysztof ¸Ada Creative Forgetting
    Chudzicka 30/5/05 11:05 Page 340 Volhynia 1943-1944 Krzysztof ¸ada Creative Forgetting Polish and Ukrainian Historiographies on the Campaigne against the Poles in Volhynia during World War II Introduction Polish and Ukrainian historiographies on the campaign of ethnic cleansing against the Poles in Volhynia during World War II differ enough to have been created by the mind of a schizophrenic. When discussing the issue, historians seem to lose control of their emotions, resulting in what often resembles the delusions and hallucinations of a troubled soul. Polish historians accuse the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (Ukrainska Povstanska Armiia), the military arm of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (Orhanizatsiia Ukrainskykh Natsionalistiv), the Bandera faction (OUN-UPA) in particu- lar, of massacring tens of thousands of Polish civilians in the territory of interwar south- eastern Poland, now Western Ukraine (mainly parts of Polesie, Volhynia and Eastern Galicia, and the eastern part of the Lublin region) and place the center and beginning of the tragedy in Volhynia.1 In short, they point out that in February/March 1943, the OUN- UPA began a policy of ethnic cleansing against the Polish Volhynians that intensified in the Glaukopis nr 2/3-2005 summer of that year and soon encompassed all of south-eastern Poland/Western Ukraine. In turn, some Ukrainian authors claim that it was the Poles who started the slaughter of the Ukrainian population in the Che∏m area (the Lublin region in eastern Poland) in 1942, or even as early as 1941, and would rather view the Volhynian events as retaliato- ry massacres.
    [Show full text]
  • 'They Defended Ukraine': the 14. Waffen-Grenadier-Division Der SS
    This article was downloaded by: [Per Anders Rudling] On: 04 September 2012, At: 10:32 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK The Journal of Slavic Military Studies Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fslv20 ‘They Defended Ukraine’: The 14. Waffen-Grenadier-Division der SS (Galizische Nr. 1) Revisited Per Anders Rudling a a Lund University Version of record first published: 04 Sep 2012 To cite this article: Per Anders Rudling (2012): ‘They Defended Ukraine’: The 14. Waffen-Grenadier- Division der SS (Galizische Nr. 1) Revisited, The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 25:3, 329-368 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2012.705633 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]