DOCSLIB.ORG

2019-2020 Version 2020.1.1 Updated February 11, 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2019-2020 Version 2020.1.1 Updated February 11, 2020 2019-2020 Version 2020.1.1 Updated February 11, 2020 High School Unified Manual Chapter, Rules, and Tournament Operations The National Speech & Debate Association is the largest interscholastic speech and debate organization serving middle school and high school in the United States. The Association provides competitive speech and debate activities, high-quality resources, comprehensive training, scholarship opportunities, and advanced recognition to more than 150,000 students and coaches every year. For more than 90 years, the National Speech & Debate Association has empowered nearly two million members to become engaged citizens, skilled professionals, and honorable leaders in our society. OUR MISSION: The National Speech & Debate Association connects, supports, and inspires a diverse community committed to empowering students through competitive speech and debate. OUR VISION: We envision a world in which every student has access to membership in the National Speech & Debate Association, providing the educational resources, competitive opportunities, and expertise necessary to foster their communication, collaboration, critical thinking, and creative skills. Editor’s Note: For quick reference throughout this document, new changes for the current year are highlighted in yellow. Other recent changes made within the past one or two years remain highlighted in gray. VISIT WWW.SPEECHANDDEBATE.ORG | FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA www.facebook.com/speechanddebate | www.instagram.com/speechanddebate | www.twitter.com/speechanddebate Table of Contents SECTION 1: High School Chapter Manual ............................................................................................ 6 Membership ........................................................................................................................................ 7 I. School Membership ........................................................................................................................ 7 II. Recording Merit Points ................................................................................................................... 8 III. Individual Membership ............................................................................................................... 11 IV. Degrees ....................................................................................................................................... 13 V. Chapter Procedures ...................................................................................................................... 14 Supplies ............................................................................................................................................. 15 Code of Honor ................................................................................................................................... 18 Coaches Code of Ethics ...................................................................................................................... 18 District and National Leadership ....................................................................................................... 19 I. District Committee ........................................................................................................................ 19 II. Board of Directors ........................................................................................................................ 19 Quick Reference for Chapter Advisors/Coaches................................................................................ 21 Schools ............................................................................................................................................ 21 Students .......................................................................................................................................... 21 Points .............................................................................................................................................. 21 SECTION 2: High School Event Rules Manual .................................................................................... 22 Main Event Rules .............................................................................................................................. 23 Policy Debate ................................................................................................................................... 23 Public Forum Debate........................................................................................................................ 24 Lincoln-Douglas Debate ................................................................................................................... 26 Congressional Debate ...................................................................................................................... 34 Original Oratory ............................................................................................................................... 43 Informative Speaking ....................................................................................................................... 43 Program Oral Interpretation ............................................................................................................. 44 Interpretation .................................................................................................................................. 45 Extemporaneous Speaking ............................................................................................................... 49 Supplemental Event Rules ................................................................................................................ 53 Extemporaneous Commentary ......................................................................................................... 53 Prose and Poetry.............................................................................................................................. 53 Extemporaneous Debate.................................................................................................................. 54 Expository ........................................................................................................................................ 56 Impromptu ...................................................................................................................................... 56 Storytelling ...................................................................................................................................... 56 USA World Schools Debate Invitational ............................................................................................ 58 SECTION 3: District Tournament Operations Manual........................................................................ 59 Planning the District Tournament ..................................................................................................... 60 Guidelines for Scheduling................................................................................................................. 60 National Speech & Debate Association • © 2019-2020 High School Unified Manual 2 Online Registration and Tabulation: Tabroom.com or The Joy of Tournaments ................................. 60 Tournament Roles and Responsibilities ............................................................................................ 60 Tournament Officials ........................................................................................................................ 60 Suggested Tournament Roles ........................................................................................................... 61 Standards for Holding a District Qualifying Tournament .................................................................. 62 District Eligibility .............................................................................................................................. 62 National Qualification Levels ............................................................................................................ 63 Auto-Qualification ........................................................................................................................... 64 NOTE: An entry that accepts auto-qualification is above and beyond the number of qualifiers a district may earn as per the Level 1-3 requirements above, whether or not the entry participates in the current year’s district tournament series. However, an auto-qualifier may participate and help a district meet its quota requirements.Registering for the District Tournament ................................... 64 School Eligibility and Entry Limits ..................................................................................................... 65 Student Eligibility and Requirements ................................................................................................ 66 Running the District Debate Tournament ......................................................................................... 69 General Rules and Instructions ......................................................................................................... 69 Absolute Pairing Priorities ................................................................................................................ 70 Pairing Rounds One and Two ............................................................................................................ 70 Pairing Subsequent Rounds
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spanish Clinical Language and Resource Guide
    SPANISH CLINICAL LANGUAGE AND RESOURCE GUIDE The Spanish Clinical Language and Resource Guide has been created to enhance public access to information about mental health services and other human service resources available to Spanish-speaking residents of Hennepin County and the Twin Cities metro area. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information, we make no guarantees. The inclusion of an organization or service does not imply an endorsement of the organization or service, nor does exclusion imply disapproval. Under no circumstances shall Washburn Center for Children or its employees be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, punitive, or consequential damages which may result in any way from your use of the information included in the Spanish Clinical Language and Resource Guide. Acknowledgements February 2015 In 2012, Washburn Center for Children, Kente Circle, and Centro collaborated on a grant proposal to obtain funding from the Hennepin County Children’s Mental Health Collaborative to help the agencies improve cultural competence in services to various client populations, including Spanish-speaking families. These funds allowed Washburn Center’s existing Spanish-speaking Provider Group to build connections with over 60 bilingual, culturally responsive mental health providers from numerous Twin Cities mental health agencies and private practices. This expanded group, called the Hennepin County Spanish-speaking Provider Consortium, meets six times a year for population-specific trainings, clinical and language peer consultation, and resource sharing. Under the grant, Washburn Center’s Spanish-speaking Provider Group agreed to compile a clinical language guide, meant to capture and expand on our group’s “¿Cómo se dice…?” conversations.
    [Show full text]
  • Shannon Silva, M.F.A
    Shannon Silva, M.F.A. University of North Carolina Wilmington [email protected] / (910) 962-2232 ​ ​ Education 2006 M.F.A. Film & Video Production, The University of Iowa 1997 B.F.A. Studio Art – Photography, Texas State University Academic Appointments 2013- Associate Professor, Film Studies, University of North Carolina Wilmington 2016-2018 Associate Chair, Film Studies, University of North Carolina Wilmington 2006-2013 Assistant Professor, Film Studies, University of North Carolina Wilmington 2002-2005 Graduate Student Instructor, Cinema and Comparative Literature, University of Iowa Course Taught at UNCW FST 201: Introduction to Film Production FST 451: Visions Film Festival and Conference FST 302: Intermediate Documentary Production Management FST 302: Intermediate Experimental Production FST 491: Independent Study in Film (various topics) FST 302: Intermediate Narrative Production FST 495: Senior Seminar: Documentary, Experimental or FST 330: Documentary Producing Animation Production FST 331: Introduction to Editing FST 495: Senior Seminar: Autobiographical Filmmaking FST334: 6x1 Experimental Filmmaking FST 497: Applied Post-Production Creative Work - In Progress Fall 2019 To Live in the Shadows: Horizontal Gene Transfer and the Evolution of Ferns (Director/Animator/Editor), short experimental animated documentary, in production ​ Celebrating color and light while contemplating threatened erasure, fierce adaptability and ultimate survival through hand drawn, stop motion animation and an interview with Boyce Thompson Institute fern specialist, Fay-Wei Li. Est. 2020 Broger’s End (Producer/Casting Director), short narrative, in pre-production Directed by Tiffany Albright. A troubled couple retreats to the woods to reconnect, but when an apocalyptic event occurs they must choose between safe isolation and the unpredictable world outside.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Start LA Pilot Community Evaluation Case Study Report 4
    Best Start LA Pilot Community Evaluation Case Study Report 4 Implementing Best Start LA: Important Transitions as the Investment is Brought to Scale Prepared for: First 5 LA Prepared by: Ian Hill and Margaret Wilkinson The University of California at Los Angeles July 2013 Acknowledgments The authors would once again like to acknowledge the support and cooperation of the numerous individuals who met with our research team to provide the information summarized in this report. These individuals shared their time, as well as their insights into how the ongoing implementation of Best Start LA in the Metro LA pilot community is proceeding. (A complete list of key informants appears in Appendix 1.) We would also like to thank the program staff at First 5 LA for their assistance in planning and coordinating our site visit. Finally, as always, we are grateful for the careful direction and support provided by our project officers at First 5 LA: Hayley Roper-Fingerhut, Christine Aque, and Melinda Leidy. For more information about First 5 LA and its initiatives, go to http://www.first5la.org. For more information about Best Start LA, go to http://www.beststartla.org. For copies of all the reports prepared under this evaluation, go to http://www.urban.org. Contents I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Methods .......................................................................................................................... 3 III. Findings:
    [Show full text]
  • Television Academy
    Television Academy 2014 Primetime Emmy Awards Ballot Outstanding Directing For A Comedy Series For a single episode of a comedy series. Emmy(s) to director(s). VOTE FOR NO MORE THAN FIVE achievements in this category that you have seen and feel are worthy of nomination. (More than five votes in this category will void all votes in this category.) 001 About A Boy Pilot February 22, 2014 Will Freeman is single, unemployed and loving it. But when Fiona, a needy, single mom and her oddly charming 11-year-old son, Marcus, move in next door, his perfect life is about to hit a major snag. Jon Favreau, Director 002 About A Boy About A Rib Chute May 20, 2014 Will is completely heartbroken when Sam receives a job opportunity she can’t refuse in New York, prompting Fiona and Marcus to try their best to comfort him. With her absence weighing on his mind, Will turns to Andy for his sage advice in figuring out how to best move forward. Lawrence Trilling, Directed by 003 About A Boy About A Slopmaster April 15, 2014 Will throws an afternoon margarita party; Fiona runs a school project for Marcus' class; Marcus learns a hard lesson about the value of money. Jeffrey L. Melman, Directed by 004 Alpha House In The Saddle January 10, 2014 When another senator dies unexpectedly, Gil John is asked to organize the funeral arrangements. Louis wins the Nevada primary but Robert has to face off in a Pennsylvania debate to cool the competition. Clark Johnson, Directed by 1 Television Academy 2014 Primetime Emmy Awards Ballot Outstanding Directing For A Comedy Series For a single episode of a comedy series.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Peace Proposal
    2002 Peace Proposal The Humanism of the Middle Way: Dawn of a Global Civilization by Daisaku Ikeda President, Soka Gakkai International January 26, 2002 Humanity last year was confronted with an extremely grave challenge to the effort to set off in an entirely new direction--the quest to part ways with the war and violence of the previous century. The September 11 terrorist attacks in the United States were a truly unprecedented act of mass murder, robbing thousands of innocent people of their lives. No cause or grievance can possibly justify such wanton destruction of human life. It was particularly bitter that 2001, the first year of the new century, designated by the United Nations as the Year of Dialogue Among Civilizations, should be marred by an incident diametrically opposed to the spirit of dialogue, of tolerance and coexistence. Further, despite the magnitude of the damage inflicted, no statement has ever been issued acknowledging guilt for the crime. The anonymous and cowardly nature of this act threatens to undermine humanity at its core. It is an assault and affront that tramples the world's aspirations to dialogue among civilizations. This crime has had a profound psychological impact on the people of the world. The historian Arthur Schlesinger described the United States after September 11 as a society filled with apprehension and anxiety, and many observers believe that the world will never be the same after that day. A dark millennial mood permeated the consciousness not only of the United States but of the entire world. The social disruption wrought by the collapse of the enormous Twin Towers and the subsequent anthrax bioterror has been described in truly apocalyptic terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Green River College 2015
    GREEN RIVER COLLEGE CATALOG ADDENDUM 2015 – 2017 CATALOG GREEN RIVER COLLEGE Aeronautics Addendum Green River College 2016 greenriver.edu 2015-2017 College Catalog Addendum Page 2 STUDENT RESOURCES Veterans Education Benefits Academic Program Revisions • Selected programs of study at Green River College are approved • Federal regulations prevent the VA/SAA from approving programs by the Workforce Training and Education Coordinating Board’s that include training that the Secretary of VA deems “avocational” State Approving Agency (STECB/SAA) for enrollment in those or “recreational.” Private pilot training has been determined, by eligible to receive benefits under Title 38 and Title 10, USC. the VA, to fit this definition, therefore Green River College may no longer approve VA education benefits for programs that include • Green River College does not and will not provide any private pilot training. commission, bonus, or other incentive payment based directly or • Students using VA education benefits may do so within the indirectly on success in securing enrollment or financial aid to any Professional Pilot Associate in Applied Science (AAS) and/or persons or entities engaged in any student recruiting or Commercial Pilot Option degrees. The Commercial Pilot FiXed admissions activities or in making decisions regarding the award Wing Pilot Option AAS is not approved for VA education benefits. of student financial assistance. • The Code of Federal Regulations (38 CFR 21.4201) states that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) shall not approve the enrollment of any VA-eligible person, not already enrolled, in any course for any period during which more than 85 percent of the students enrolled in the course are having all or part of their tuition , fees, or other charges paid to or for them by an educational institution or the VA.
    [Show full text]
  • Susan Steinberg RE: Pilot Project: Residential Eating Disorders
    Behavioral Health Administration Aliya Jones, M.D., MBA Deputy Secretary Behavioral Health 55 Wade Ave., Dix Bldg., SGHC Catonsville, MD 21228 TO: MABHA FROM: Susan Steinberg RE: Pilot Project: Residential Eating Disorders Program for adults and/or minors Date: June 4, 2021 The Behavioral Health Program is issuing a “Request for Proposals” for Residential Eating Disorders Programs to serve adults and/or minors. Background: Over the past couple of years, BHA has received inquiries from entities seeking to establish a residential eating disorder program for children & adolescents and asked for advice regarding how to license such a program. The possible licensure categories are a residential treatment center (RTC), or a therapeutic group home (TGH). RTCs requires a Certificate of Need, a schooling component and maybe a higher level of care that the program did not want to meet. By statute, a TGH must be owned by a non-profit. Also, there is the question of whether a TGH provides the appropriate level of care. OHCQ has a category called Limited Private Inpatient Facility, but by regulations that is limited to adults. Thus, no category of licensure fits the model of care that these private companies wish to establish in Maryland. BHA regulations state that the Department may exempt a program from licensure requirements if the program is a pilot project and the program demonstrates to the Department that it is subject to contractual provisions, conditions of grant awards, or other requirements that are comparable to the regulations in COMAR 10.63. Therefore, to assist these providers, BHA has established a pilot project for residential eating disorder programs.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ergonomic Evaluation of Aircraft Pilot Seats
    Dissertations and Theses Fall 2013 An Ergonomic Evaluation of Aircraft Pilot Seats Yolanda Nicole Andrade Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/edt Part of the Aviation Commons, and the Ergonomics Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Andrade, Yolanda Nicole, "An Ergonomic Evaluation of Aircraft Pilot Seats" (2013). Dissertations and Theses. 14. https://commons.erau.edu/edt/14 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Ergonomic Evaluation of Aircraft Pilot Seats by Yolanda Nicole Andrade A Thesis Submitted to the College of Arts and Science in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Human Factors and Systems Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Daytona Beach, Florida Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Problem Statement .................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose Statement ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Review of Literature ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tv Land Orders Pilot of Web Hit “Teachers,” to Be Executive Produced by “Community” Star Alison Brie
    TV LAND ORDERS PILOT OF WEB HIT “TEACHERS,” TO BE EXECUTIVE PRODUCED BY “COMMUNITY” STAR ALISON BRIE New York, NY – March 19, 2014 – TV Land has given a pilot order to “Teachers,” based on the popular web series of the same name, it was announced today by Larry W. Jones, President, TV Land. The show revolves around six elementary school teachers who are trying to mold the minds and lives of America’s youth, but they don’t really seem to have their own lives together at all. From making their class help them stalk exes online to altering a grade because the art teacher is “kind of a b****,” these teachers are certainly changing the world, one student at a time. Alison Brie (“Community”) is attached as an executive producer, and the stars of the web series, all named a version of “Katie” – Caitlin Barlow, Katy Colloton, Cate Freedman, Kate Lambert, Katie O’Brien and Katie Thomas – are all signed on to reprise their roles. “From the second this project came across my desk, I’ve been in love with it,” said Jones. “The tone of the show is unlike anything we’ve had on TV Land. I’m really excited about the idea of building this unexplored world, where teachers are the eccentric characters you always hoped they weren’t.” Barlow, Colloton, Freedman, Lambert, O’Brien and Thomas, who call their group The Katydids, are all from Chicago with experience at The Second City, The Upright Citizens Brigade Theater in New York and iO West in Los Angeles.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Health and Enloe Medical Center to Pilot Myturn with Limited Appointments
    Public Health Administration Danette York, M.P.H., Director Robert Bernstein, M.D., Health Officer 202 Mira Loma Drive T: 530.552.4000 buttecounty.net/publichealth Oroville, California 95965 F: 530.538.2164 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 3, 2021 Public Health and Enloe Medical Center to Pilot MyTurn with Limited Appointments BUTTE COUNTY, Calif. -- As part of a statewide directive, Butte County will begin to test the State’s new MyTurn COVID-19 vaccine scheduling system. Butte County Public Health (BCPH) and Enloe Medical Center will pilot the system during a limited first dose community vaccination clinic for Butte County residents currently eligible for the vaccine, on Friday, March 5 at the Silver Dollar Fairgrounds in Chico, by appointment only. A limited number of appointments will be available for eligible residents ages 65 and older and residents working in the following sectors: emergency services, education & childcare, agriculture, food and healthcare workers. Proof of employment for eligible sectors is required. These appointments will fill up very quickly. BCPH and Enloe are grateful for your patience as they test the MyTurn system, which means scheduling may not run as smoothly as expected. This pilot will help BCPH and Enloe to understand how the system works and to identify any glitches that may arise to ensure the system runs smoothly when larger community clinics are scheduled. This is a very exciting step to streamlining COVID vaccine scheduling for Butte County residents as supply increases and large-scale community vaccination clinics become available. While Friday’s pilot clinic is to test the system, eventually the County will transition away from its current COVID vaccine scheduling (Sign-up Genius) to MyTurn.
    [Show full text]
  • We Wanted Wings: a History of the Aviation Cadet Program
    Cover illustration: “Aviation Cadets in Training – 1943” by Dottie Knight. (Courtesy, United States Air Force Art Collection) WE WANTED WINGS: A HISTORY OF THE AVIATION CADET PROGRAM Dr. Bruce A. Ashcroft Staff Historian HQ AETC/HO 2005 OFFICER CODE Duty well performed, Honor in all things, Country before self. AVIATION CADET HONOR CODE Article 1: An Aviation Cadet will not knowingly make any false statement, written or verbal, while acting in any capacity, official or otherwise, or in any situation reflecting on the Aviation Cadet Corps or the Air Force. Article 2: An Aviation Cadet will not take or receive the property of another person, or persons, under any conditions, without specific authority of that person or persons. Article 3: An Aviation Cadet will not impart or receive any unauthorized assistance, either outside or inside the classroom or places of instruction, which would tend to give any Aviation Cadet unfair advantage. Article 4: An Aviation Cadet will not quibble, use evasive statements, or technicalities in order to shield guilt or defeat the ends of justice. Article 5: An Aviation Cadet will report any violation of honor by another Aviation Cadet of which he is witness or has unquestionable knowledge. Article 6: An Aviation Cadet will not commit any act of intentional dishonesty which will reflect in any way on the honor and integrity of the Aviation Cadet Corps and the Air Force. Officer Code and Cadet Honor Code both from brochure, “Aviation Cadet Knowledge,” Preflight Training School, Lackland AFB TX, 1959. ii iii
    [Show full text]
  • B Sharp-The Cognitive Effects of a Pilot Community Music Program For
    Alzheimer’s& Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions 5 (2019) 592-596 Short Report B Sharp—The cognitive effects of a pilot community music program for people with dementia-related disorders Deana B. Davalosa,*, India Luxtonb, Michael Thautc,d, Jennifer E. Crossb aDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA bDepartment of Sociology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA cBiomedical Research in Music, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA dMusic and Health Science Research Collaboratory, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Abstract Introduction: Dementia has been described as the greatest global challenge for healthcare in the 21st century. Pharmaceutical interventions have dominated dementia treatment despite limited efficacy. There is increasing interest in alternatives to delay the progression of cognitive decline, such as com- munity-based programs, promoting social and stimulating experiences. This article discusses a pilot music-based community program (B Sharp) for persons with dementia-related disorders. Method: In the pilot study, we assessed 23 persons with dementia-related disorders who, with their caregivers, attended the symphony season and accompanying social hours over a 10-month period. Par- ticipants completed a baseline and follow-up brief neuropsychological test to assess cognitive changes. Results: Significant improvements were observed between the pre– and post–B Sharp program as- sessments (P , .010). Discussion: Results support the feasibility of the B Sharp program as a community-based program to target cognitive decline. Additional research is needed to understand the mechanisms involved in the improvements observed in this program. Ó 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the Alzheimer’s Association.
    [Show full text]