World Bank Document

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

World Bank Document Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: ICR00004042 IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION AND RESULTS REPORT (ICR) ON A SMALL GRANT1 IN THE AMOUNT OF US$2.67 MILLION Public Disclosure Authorized TO THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA FOR STRENGTHENING THE LIVELIHOODS AND VOICE OF POOR AND VULNERABLE PERSONS IN ARMENIA PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized February 15, 2017 Social Protection and Labor Global Practice Europe and Central Asia Region Public Disclosure Authorized 1 This ICR satisfies any other requirement for small grants completion reporting. ii CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective: January 1, 2017) Current Unit = Armenian Dram (AMD) AMD 487 = US$1 FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS DRC Disability Resource Center FM Financial Management ICR Implementation Completion and Results Report ISR Implementation Status and Results Report JSDF Japan Social Development Fund MLSA Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs MA Mission Armenia M&E Monitoring and Evaluation NGO Nongovernmental Organization OTJ On-the-Job OM Operational Manual PDO Project Development Objective PSC Project Steering Committee PWD Person with Disabilities SC Steering Committee SEA State Employment Agency Regional Vice President: Cyril E. Muller Country Director: Mercy MiyangTembon Senior Global Practice Director: Michal Rutkowski Practice Manager: Andrew D. Mason Project Team Leader: Marina Petrovic ICR Team Leader: Maddalena Honorati iii REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA Strengthening the Livelihood and Voice of Poor and Vulnerable People in Armenia TABLE OF CONTENTS DATA SHEET A. Basic Information ......................................................................................................................1 B. Key Dates ..................................................................................................................................1 C. Ratings Summary ......................................................................................................................1 D. Results Indicators ......................................................................................................................2 I. Project Development Objectives and Design ......................................................................4 II. Key Factors Affecting Implementation ...............................................................................7 III. Assessment of Outcomes ...................................................................................................11 IV. Risk to Sustainability .........................................................................................................17 V. Lessons Learned.................................................................................................................18 ANNEXES Annex 1. Team Composition ........................................................................................................21 Annex 2. Implementing Agency Background ..............................................................................23 Annex 3. Outputs by Component..................................................................................................25 Map: IBRD 33364 iv DATA SHEET A. Basic Information Region: Europe and Central Asia Country(ies): Armenia Global Practice: Social Protection and Joint with IFC No Labor Recipient: Mission Armenia, on Implementing Mission behalf of the Government Agencies: Armenia of the Republic of Armenia Sector(s)/Theme(s): 100% Social Protection Theme Code (as % of total Bank financing) Income Support for Old Age, Disability & 30 Survivorship Other social protection and risk management 30 Participation and civic engagement 20 Social Safety Nets/Social Assistance & Social Care 20 Services Executed by: Recipient Project ID: P125791 TF Name and TF013894 Number(s): Original Grant Amount: US$2,670,000 Donor(s): Japan Revised Amount: US$2,670,000 Disbursed Amount: US$2,670,000 Environmental C Safeguards Triggered: n.a. Category: B. Key Dates Process Date Process Date Concept Review: 17-Dec-2012 Effectiveness: 15-Mar-2013 Appraisal: Restructuring(s): 19-Oct-2015 Approval: 01-Mar-2013 Closing: 01-Mar-2016 Revised Closing Date: (if 01-Sep-2016 any) C. Ratings Summary Outcomes: Satisfactory Implementation: Moderately Satisfactory Risk to Sustainability: Moderate 1 (a) Project Development Objective Indicators2 D. Results Indicators Original Target Actual Value Formally Values Achieved at Indicator Baseline Value Revised Target (from approval Completion or Values documents) Target Years Indicator 1: Number of graduates in sustained wage employment (Number, Custom) Value — (Quantitative or 0 200 203 Qualitative) Date achieved May 17, 2013 March 1, 2016 — August 31, 2016 Comments (including % Target surpassed. achievement) Indicator 2: Number of businesses in sustained operation (Number, Custom) Value (Quantitative or 0 40 — 90 Qualitative) Date achieved May 17, 2013 March 1, 2016 — August 31, 2016 Comments (including % Target surpassed. achievement) Increase of number of individuals helped by Mission Armenia to get benefits Indicator 3: (Number, Custom) Value (Quantitative or 88 1,000 — 1,239 Qualitative) September 30, — Date achieved March 1, 2013 August 31, 2016 2013 Comments (including % Target surpassed. achievement) Retaining or increasing capacity to independently carry-out activities of daily Indicator 4: living (Percentage, Custom) Value (Quantitative or 60 70 — 85 Qualitative) September 30, — Date achieved March 1, 2016 August 31, 2016 2013 2 These are Project Development Objective (PDO) indicators that are tracked in the ISRs. For further explanation see Section 1.1. 2 Target surpassed. This indicator is clarified in the Operational Manual (OM) Comments as: ‘Beneficiaries retain or improve their well-being, as measured by (a) (including % Morbidity per month; (b) Increase of capacity to independently carry-out achievement) activities of daily living; and (c) Increase of number of individuals helped by Mission Armenia (MA) to get benefits’. Indicator 5: Community financing (Percentage, Custom) Value (Quantitative or 10 11 — 12 Qualitative) Date achieved May 17, 2013 March 1, 2016 — August 31, 2016 Comments Target surpassed. Community financing is defined as contributions from local (including % governments, individuals, and from other nongovernmental organizations achievement) (NGOs). Indicator 6: Visits to project-supported government facilities (Number, Custom) Value (Quantitative or 0 n.a. — 19,666 Qualitative) Date achieved May 17, 2013 March 1, 2016 — August 31, 2016 Comments This indicator was linked to rehabilitation of infrastructure, which was ongoing (including % till the project closing date. Number is an estimate. achievement) (b) Intermediate Outcome Indicator(s) Original Target Formally Actual Value Values Revised Achieved at Indicator Baseline Value (from approval Target Completion or documents) Values Target Years Indicator 1: Number of beneficiaries. (Number, Custom) Value (Quantitative 2,100 4,000 — 4,856 or Qualitative) Date achieved September 30, 2013 March 1, 2016 — August 31, 2016 Comments (including % Target surpassed. achievement) 3 I. Project Development Objectives and Design 1. Original Project Development Objectives (PDO) and Key Indicators 1. The approval for this Japan Social Development Fund (JSDF)-funded project did not include the drafting of a separate Project Paper. Therefore, this Implementation Completion and Results Report (ICR) evaluation uses the PDO statement from the Grant Agreement (GA), Operational Manual (OM), and Implementation Status and Results Reports (ISRs): To pilot self- reliant livelihoods and generation of employment opportunities combined with the provision of vital services for extremely poor and vulnerable groups, including persons with disabilities, in Armenia. 2. An initial draft set of indicators was included in the Grant Proposal. Later on, these were elaborated and approved as part of the OM for the project and began to be tracked in the ISRs. For this completion evaluation, the list of key indicators from the ISRs (shown below) will be used. These are considered consistent with the Legal Agreement and with the other project documents. (a) Number of graduates in sustained wage employment (b) Number of businesses in sustained operation (c) Increase of number of individuals helped by Mission Armenia to get benefits (d) Retaining or increasing capacity to independently carry-out activities of daily living (e) Community financing (f) Visits to project-supported government facilities. 3. The indicators from the ISR deviate slightly from the OM indicators. The OM indicators are thus also reviewed in the ICR, as additional evidence. Table 1 compares the outcome indicators from the ISRs with the indicators from the OM. Table 1. Results Framework - Comparison between Indicators in the ISRs and OM Outcome Indicators Outcome Indicator Target Target Achievement from ISR from OM Number of graduates 200 At least 200 of the 200/700 203 graduates in wage in sustained wage 700 graduates of employment employment (Number, training courses are In addition: Custom) still in wage employment three about 800 unemployed months after they poor and vulnerable people were placed in jobs. start training. About 70 percent are person with disabilities (PWDs) and about 30 percent are other vulnerable people; about 550 of these poor and vulnerable people graduate from training; and out of the 800 people 4 Outcome Indicators Outcome Indicator Target Target Achievement from
Recommended publications
  • Environmental Management Plan ARM: Water Supply and Sanitation
    Environmental Management Plan Loan 2860 (SF) March 2015 ARM: Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project – Additional Financing Improvement of Water Supply Systems in Artik Town, Nor Kyank, Vardakar, Hovtashen, Geghanist and Mets Mantash Villages Prepared by the Armenian Water and Sewerage Closed Joint Stock Company (AWSC) for the Asian Development Bank. The environmental management plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. FUNDED BY ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION SECTOR PROJECT - ADDITIONAL FINANCING Date of preparation - 23/12/2014 Date of revision – 12/01/2015 Date of approval –18/03/2015 Subproject IX IMPROVEMENT OF THE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS OF THE SETTLEMENTS OF SHIRAK REGION L2860-ICB-1-09/1 ARTIK TOWN, NOR KYANK, VARDAKAR, HOVTASHEN, GEGHANIST AND METS MANTASH VILLAGES ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN Yerevan, March, 2015 HGSN LLC. - JINJ Ltd. Improvement of the water supply systems of Shirak region settlements FUNDED BY ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION SECTOR PROJECT - ADDITIONAL FINANCING Subproject IX IMPROVEMENT OF THE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS OF THE SETTLEMENTS OF SHIRAK REGION L2860-ICB-1-09/1 ARTIK TOWN, NOR KYANK, VARDAKAR, HOVTASHEN, GEGHANIST AND METS MANTASH VILLAGES Book IX.1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN HGSN LLC, Director V.
    [Show full text]
  • L'arte Armena. Storia Critica E Nuove Prospettive Studies in Armenian
    e-ISSN 2610-9433 THE ARMENIAN ART ARMENIAN THE Eurasiatica ISSN 2610-8879 Quaderni di studi su Balcani, Anatolia, Iran, Caucaso e Asia Centrale 16 — L’arte armena. Storia critica RUFFILLI, SPAMPINATO RUFFILLI, FERRARI, RICCIONI, e nuove prospettive Studies in Armenian and Eastern Christian Art 2020 a cura di Edizioni Aldo Ferrari, Stefano Riccioni, Ca’Foscari Marco Ruffilli, Beatrice Spampinato L’arte armena. Storia critica e nuove prospettive Eurasiatica Serie diretta da Aldo Ferrari, Stefano Riccioni 16 Eurasiatica Quaderni di studi su Balcani, Anatolia, Iran, Caucaso e Asia Centrale Direzione scientifica Aldo Ferrari (Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia) Stefano Riccioni (Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia) Comitato scientifico Michele Bacci (Universität Freiburg, Schweiz) Giampiero Bellingeri (Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia) Levon Chookaszian (Yerevan State University, Armenia) Patrick Donabédian (Université d’Aix-Marseille, CNRS UMR 7298, France) Valeria Fiorani Piacentini (Università Cattolica del Sa- cro Cuore, Milano, Italia) Ivan Foletti (Masarikova Univerzita, Brno, Česká republika) Gianfranco Giraudo (Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia) Annette Hoffmann (Kunsthistorisches Institut in Florenz, Deutschland) Christina Maranci (Tuft University, Medford, MA, USA) Aleksander Nau- mow (Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia) Antonio Panaino (Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna, Italia) Antonio Rigo (Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia) Adriano Rossi (Università degli Studi di Napoli «L’Orientale», Italia)
    [Show full text]
  • Development Project Ideas Goris, Tegh, Gorhayk, Meghri, Vayk
    Ministry of Territorial Administration and Development of the Republic of Armenia DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IDEAS GORIS, TEGH, GORHAYK, MEGHRI, VAYK, JERMUK, ZARITAP, URTSADZOR, NOYEMBERYAN, KOGHB, AYRUM, SARAPAT, AMASIA, ASHOTSK, ARPI Expert Team Varazdat Karapetyan Artyom Grigoryan Artak Dadoyan Gagik Muradyan GIZ Coordinator Armen Keshishyan September 2016 List of Acronyms MTAD Ministry of Territorial Administration and Development ATDF Armenian Territorial Development Fund GIZ German Technical Cooperation LoGoPro GIZ Local Government Programme LSG Local Self-government (bodies) (FY)MDP Five-year Municipal Development Plan PACA Participatory Assessment of Competitive Advantages RDF «Regional Development Foundation» Company LED Local economic development 2 Contents List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................ 2 Contents ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Structure of the Report .............................................................................................................. 5 Preamble ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 9 Approaches to Project Implementation ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Shirak Guidebook
    Wuthering Heights of Shirak -the Land of Steppe and Sky YYerevanerevan 22013013 1 Facts About Shirak FOREWORD Mix up the vast open spaces of the Shirak steppe, the wuthering wind that sweeps through its heights, the snowcapped tops of Mt. Aragats and the dramatic gorges and sparkling lakes of Akhurian River. Sprinkle in the white sheep fl ocks and the cry of an eagle. Add churches, mysterious Urartian ruins, abundant wildlife and unique architecture. Th en top it all off with a turbulent history, Gyumri’s joi de vivre and Gurdjieff ’s mystical teaching, revealing a truly magnifi cent region fi lled with experi- ences to last you a lifetime. However, don’t be deceived that merely seeing all these highlights will give you a complete picture of what Shirak really is. Dig deeper and you’ll be surprised to fi nd that your fondest memories will most likely lie with the locals themselves. You’ll eas- ily be touched by these proud, witt y, and legendarily hospitable people, even if you cannot speak their language. Only when you meet its remarkable people will you understand this land and its powerful energy which emanates from their sculptures, paintings, music and poetry. Visiting the province takes creativity and imagination, as the tourist industry is at best ‘nascent’. A great deal of the current tourist fl ow consists of Diasporan Armenians seeking the opportunity to make personal contributions to their historic homeland, along with a few scatt ered independent travelers. Although there are some rural “rest- places” and picnic areas, they cater mainly to locals who want to unwind with hearty feasts and family chats, thus rarely providing any activities.
    [Show full text]
  • REQUEST for QUOTATION RFQ 073/20 (Re-Tender)
    REQUEST FOR QUOTATION RFQ 073/20 (re-tender) DATE: 31 July 2020 NAME & ADDRESS OF FIRM REFERENCE: Procurement of livestock (sheep) for beneficiaries in Armenia 3 regions Dear Bidder: We kindly request you to submit your quotation for “Procurement of livestock (sheep) for beneficiaries in Armenia 3 regions” detailed in Annex 1 of this RFQ. When preparing your quotation, please be guided by the form attached hereto as Annex 2. Quotations may be submitted on or before 16:00 (GMT +4) on August 7, 2020 and via ☒e-mail, only. [email protected] No hard copies are accepted Quotations submitted by email must be limited to a maximum of 10MB, virus-free and no more than 3 email transmissions. They must be free from any form of virus or corrupted contents, or the quotations shall be rejected. It shall remain your responsibility to ensure that your quotation will reach the address above on or before the deadline. Quotations that are received by UNDP after the deadline indicated above, for whatever reason, shall not be considered for evaluation. If you are submitting your quotation by email, kindly ensure that they are signed and in the .pdf format, and free from any virus or corrupted files. Please take note of the following requirements and conditions pertaining to the supply of the above mentioned good/s: 1 Delivery Terms ☒ DAP Shirak, Lori and Tavush provinces, Armenia [INCOTERMS 2010] Customs clearance1, if ☒ by UNDP needed, shall be done by: Exact Address of Delivery Lori region: Vanadzor, Spitak, Tashir, Stepanavan Location: Shirak region: Gyumri, Ashotsk, Amasia, Artik Tavush region: Ijevan, Dilijan, Berd, Noyemberyan Latest Expected Delivery ☒ 45 days from the issuance of the Purchase Order (PO)/ Contract for Goods Delivery Schedule ☒Required Mode of Transport ☒LAND (preferred) Preferred ☒United States Dollars or 2 Currency of Quotation ☒Local Currency: Armenian drams Value Added Tax on Price ☒Must be exclusive of VAT and other applicable indirect taxes 3 Quotation After-sales services required ☒Warranty minimum period of 1 year with appropriate certificate.
    [Show full text]
  • Ra Shirak Marz
    RA SHIRAK MARZ 251 RA SHIRAK MARZ Marz center – Gyumri town Territories - Artik, Akhuryan, Ani, Amasia and Ashotsk Towns - Gyumri, Artik, Maralik RA Shirak marz is situated in the north-west of the republic. In the West it borders with Turkey, in the North it borders with Georgia, in the East – RA Lori marz and in the South – RA Aragatsotn marz. Territory 2681 square km. Territory share of the marz in the territory of RA 9 % Urban communities 3 Rural communities 116 Towns 3 Villages 128 Population number as of January 1, 2006 281.4 ths. persons including urban 171.4 ths. persons rural 110.0 ths. persons Share of urban population size 60.9 % Share of marz population size in RA population size, 2005 39.1 % Agricultural land 165737 ha including - arable land 84530 ha Being at the height of 1500-2000 m above sea level (52 villages of the marz are at the height of 1500-1700 m above sea level and 55 villages - 2000 m), the marz is the coldest region 0 of Armenia, where the air temperature sometimes reaches -46 C in winter. The main railway and automobile highway connecting Armenia with Georgia pass through the marz territory. The railway and motor-road networks of Armenia and Turkey are connected here. On the Akhuryan river frontier with Turkey the Akhuryan reservoir was built that is the biggest in the country by its volume of 526 mln. m3. Marzes of the Republic of Armenia in figures, 1998-2002 252 The leading branches of industry of RA Shirak marz are production of food, including beverages and production of other non-metal mineral products.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Agricultural Resource Management and Competitiveness Project
    AGRICULTURAL PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UNIT COMMUNITY AGRICULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND COMPETITIVENESS PROJECT COMPONENT 1: COMMUNITY PASTURE AND LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN RENOVATION OF PASTURES WATERING NETWORK IN LICHK COMMUNITY OF THE RA GEGHARKUNIK MARZ November 2014 A. GENERAL PROJECT AND SITE INFORMATION INSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE Country Republic of Armenia Name of the Project Community Agro Resource Management and Competitiveness Subproject Title Renovation of pastures watering network in Lichk community of Gegharkunik marz Institutional Project Team Project Local Arrangements Leader (WB) Management Counterpart and/or Recipient (Name and contacts) Arusyak Gagik Khachatryan, Gnel Grigoryan Alahverdyan PIU Director Head of Lichk Community Implementation Safeguard Safeguard Contractor Arrangements Supervision (WB) Supervision (PIU) (Name and contacts) Darejan Kamo ……….. Kapanadze Khachatryan Alice Savadyan PROJECT NAME AND SITE DESCRIPTION Description of the Project The main purpose of the sub-project is the improvement of pastures watering network in Lichk community providing sufficient water supply for 1896 bovine cattle and 1122 small cattle directly in the pasture. The following construction activities will be implemented under the proposed sub-project: Installation of 2 water ways, which will be connected to drinking water pipeline, 23,0 m length (PE 57x2,8 ) waterway 50,0 m length (PE 57x2,8) waterway, Construction of two 24,0 and 18,0 long metallic troughs- semi-pipes installed on concrete - cobblestone platform. 2 water collection chambers installation 51,0.2x20.0 m open cattle-pen construction, from which 15.0x6.0m will have a roof Construction of 4.6x6.4, h=3.0 m shelter for herdsman The design for pastures watering network has been developed by the MANANA -1 design company under the contract concluded with Agricultural Project Implementation Unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Urban Heating Policy Assessment
    Final Draft ALLIANCE TO SAVE ENERGY Municipal Network for Energy Efficiency Armenian Urban Heating Policy Assessment By Arusyak Ghukasyan and Astghine Pasoyan Table of Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS...................................................................................................................................4 LIST OF TABLES.....................................................................................................................................................5 LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................................5 LIST OF BOXES .......................................................................................................................................................5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................................6 1 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................................8 2 EVOLUTION AND CURRENT STATUS OF ARMENIA’S DISTRICT HEAT SUPPLY SECTOR.....................................................................................................................................................................8 3 HEAT SUPPLY POLICY REFORM AND RESTRUCTURING EFFORTS .............................11 3.1 ARMENIA’S URBAN HEATING STRATEGY ..............................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Features of Local Government Formation and Development in the Republic of Armenia (Using the Example of Gavar City Municipality of the Gekharkunik Region)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Revista Amazonia Investiga Evstratova, T., Kabanova, E., Vetrova, E., Palehova, P., Manasyan, G. /Vol. 8 Núm. 23: 556- 564/ Noviembre - diciembre 2019 556 Artículo de investigación Features of local government formation and development in the Republic of Armenia (using the example of Gavar city municipality of the Gekharkunik Region) Особенности Формирования И Развития Местного Самоуправления В Республике Армения (На Примере Муниципалитета Города Гавар Гехаркуникской Области) Características de la formación y desarrollo del gobierno local en la República de Armenia (utilizando el ejemplo del municipio de la ciudad de Gavar de la región de Gekharkunik) Recibido: 8 de agosto del 2019 Aceptado: 16 de septiembre del 2019 Written by: Tatiana A. Evstratova 225 Elena E. Kabanova226 Ekaterina A. Vetrova227 Polina V. Palehova228 Gevorg V. Manasyan229 Abstract Аннотация New sovereign states appeared after the collapse После распада СССР появились новые of the USSR, which have to develop democratic суверенные государства, которым предстоит society for a long time. With the development of долгий путь по построению public administration decentralization, a демократического общества. С развитием significant part of the obligations and powers to децентрализации государственного manage the property of cities and rural areas, управления значительная часть обязательств health, education, culture, and sports was и полномочий по управлению имуществом transferred to the localities. The process of the городов и сельской местности, legal field of municipality development began, здравоохранением, образованием, культурой, which has not been completed to this day. The спортом была передана на места. Начался optimization of municipality management in процесс формирования правового поля modern conditions will allow to achieve the муниципалитетов, который не завершён и по highest possible results, enhance the involvement сей день.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Annual Report Society for Orphaned Armenian Relief (SOAR) ATTN: George S
    Annual2018 Report SOAR Society for Orphaned Armenian Relief (SOAR) 1 Society for Orphaned Armenian Relief (SOAR) SOAR Providing humanitarian relief to orphaned Armenians throughout the world 2018 Annual Report Society for Orphaned Armenian Relief (SOAR) ATTN: George S. Yacoubian, Jr. 150 N. Radnor Chester Road, Suite F200 Radnor, PA 19087 Cell: 267.615.1944 Fax: 610.229.5168 Email: [email protected] Web: www.soar-us.org 2 Table of Contents Greetings from the Executive Board Chairman.......................................4 Creation and Management.........................................................................5 Quality Control............................................................................................7 Institutions We Support..............................................................................8 Funds...........................................................................................................12 Programs.....................................................................................................14 2018 Distributions......................................................................................16 Activity Highlights......................................................................................20 Accounting Summary.................................................................................36 Conclusion..................................................................................................38 3 Greetings from the Executive Board Chairman To Our SOAR Family:
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia
    SAMVEL AVETISYAN AGRICULTURE AND FOOD PROCESSING IN ARMENIA YEREVAN 2010 Dedicated to the memory of the author’s son, Sergey Avetisyan Approved for publication by the Scientifi c and Technical Council of the RA Ministry of Agriculture Peer Reviewers: Doctor of Economics, Prof. Ashot Bayadyan Candidate Doctor of Economics, Docent Sergey Meloyan Technical Editor: Doctor of Economics Hrachya Tspnetsyan Samvel S. Avetisyan Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia – Limush Publishing House, Yerevan 2010 - 138 pages Photos courtesy CARD, Zaven Khachikyan, Hambardzum Hovhannisyan This book presents the current state and development opportunities of the Armenian agriculture. Special importance has been attached to the potential of agriculture, the agricultural reform process, accomplishments and problems. The author brings up particular facts in combination with historic data. Brief information is offered on leading agricultural and processing enterprises. The book can be a useful source for people interested in the agrarian sector of Armenia, specialists, and students. Publication of this book is made possible by the generous fi nancial support of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and assistance of the “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. The contents do not necessarily represent the views of USDA, the U.S. Government or “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. INTRODUCTION Food and Agriculture sector is one of the most important industries in Armenia’s economy. The role of the agrarian sector has been critical from the perspectives of the country’s economic development, food safety, and overcoming rural poverty. It is remarkable that still prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union, Armenia made unprecedented steps towards agrarian reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Plan of Action (Epoa) Armenia: Landslides
    Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Armenia : Landslides DREF Operation n° MDRAM003 Glide n° MS-2016-000070-ARM Date of issue: 8 July 2016 Date of disaster: 24 June 2016 Operation Manager (responsible for this EPoA): Point of Contact (name and title): Rubén ROMERO, Edmon AZ ARYAN Disaster Management Coordinator, IFRC Regional Head of Disaster Management and Population Office for Europe Movement Department Phone: +36 1 888 45 05 Phone: + (374) 6062505 8 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Operation start date: 11 June 2016 Expected timeframe: 2 months (8 July – 8 September 2016) Overall operation budget: CHF 55,046 Number of people affected: Number of people to be assisted: 750 people (162 households) 600 people in 132 households Host National Society Presence: The Armenian Red Cross ( ARCS) has regional branches affected Gegharquniq and Shirak regions which will be key role players in the field operation. Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: The local and regional authorities of targeted areas will be actively involved in the operation. A. Situation analysis Description of the disaster On 24 June 2016, as a result of heavy hailstorm and rains, an unprecedented mudflow seriously damaged Karchaghbyur village of Gegharqunik region and Artik city of Shirak region with homes, public buildings, streets and bridges as well as agricultural lands seriously affected. Following the disaster, electric power cuts made response activities even more difficult on the local level. Karchakhbyur village is located 30 km away from the border with Azerbaijan in a remote and isolated area of Gegharqunik region, which is one of the poorest regions in Armenia.
    [Show full text]