Investment Banking & Securities Dealing in the US

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Investment Banking & Securities Dealing in the US WWW.IBISWORLD.COM Investment Banking & Securities Dealing in the US June 2019 1 Wealth wishes: Rising interest rates are expected to continue benefiting industry revenue growth This report was provided to Seattle Pacific University (2134440152) by IBISWorld on 03 December 2019 in accordance with their license agreement with IBISWorld IBISWorld Industry Report 52311 Investment Banking & Securities Dealing in the US June 2019 Anthony Gambardella 2 About this Industry 17 International Trade 33 Operating Conditions 2 Industry Definition 18 Business Locations 33 Capital Intensity 2 Main Activities 34 Technology and Systems 2 Similar Industries 21 Competitive Landscape 35 Revenue Volatility 2 Additional Resources 21 Market Share Concentration 36 Regulation and Policy 21 Key Success Factors 37 Industry Assistance 3 Industry at a Glance 21 Cost Structure Benchmarks 23 Basis of Competition 38 Key Statistics 4 Industry Performance 24 Barriers to Entry 38 Industry Data 4 Executive Summary 25 Industry Globalization 38 Annual Change 4 Key External Drivers 38 Key Ratios 6 Current Performance 26 Major Companies 39 Industry Financial Ratios 9 Industry Outlook 26 JPMorgan Chase & Co. 11 Industry Life Cycle 27 Morgan Stanley 40 Jargon & Glossary 28 Bank of America Corporation 13 Products and Markets 30 Citigroup Inc. 13 Supply Chain 31 The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. 13 Products and Services 32 Credit Suisse Group 15 Demand Determinants 16 Major Markets www.ibisworld.com | 1-800-330-3772 | [email protected] WWW.IBISWORLD.COM Investment Banking & Securities Dealing in the US June 2019 2 About this Industry Industry Definition This industry is composed of companies and (trading their own capital for a profit) to individuals that provide a range of securities varying degrees. Investment banking services, including investment banking and services include securities underwriting and broker-dealer trading services. They also corporate financial services, while trading offer banking and wealth management services include market making and services and engage in proprietary trading broker-dealer services. Main Activities The primary activities of this industry are Underwriting, originating or maintaining markets for securities issuance Principal and proprietary trading Providing corporate strategy advisory services Providing corporate finance services The major products and services in this industry are Advising fees Underwriting services (equity) Trading and related services Underwriting services (debt) Other Similar Industries 52312 Securities Brokering in the US Operators in this industry act as agents in buying or selling securities on a commission or transaction fee basis. 52391 Venture Capital & Principal Trading in the US Operators in this industry primarily buy and sell financial contracts (e.g. securities) on their own account. 52392 Portfolio Management in the US Operators in this industry manage financial portfolios. 52599 Private Equity, Hedge Funds & Investment Vehicles in the US Operators in this industry manage collection-investment vehicles that invest in a broad range of asset classes. Additional Resources For additional information on this industry www.sifma.org Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association www.thomsonreuters.com Thomson Reuters Corporation www.federalreserve.gov US Federal Reserve Provided to: Seattle Pacific University (2134440152) | 03 December 2019 WWW.IBISWORLD.COM Investment Banking & Securities Dealing in the US June 2019 3 Industry at a Glance Investment Banking & Securities Dealing in 2019 Key Statistics Revenue Annual Growth 14–19 Annual Growth 19–24 Snapshot $133.1bn 2.6% 2.3% Profit Wages Businesses $35.3bn $44.4bn 11,182 Revenue vs. employment growth Corporate profit Market Share JPMorgan Chase & 10 12 Co. 5 13.0% 8 0 Morgan Stanley 4 -5 9.6% % change % change 0 Bank of America -10 Corporation -15 -4 9.1% Year 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 Year 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 Citigroup Inc. Revenue Employment 8.8% SOURCE: WWW.IBISWORLD.COM The Goldman Products and services segmentation (2019) 7.5% Sachs Group Inc. Underwriting services (equity) 8.4% 8.1% p. 26 Other Key External Drivers 11.3% Corporate profit Underwriting services (debt) Initial public offerings 59.1% Trading and related services S&P 500 Investor uncertainty 14.0% Advising fees p. 4 SOURCE: WWW.IBISWORLD.COM Industry Structure Life Cycle Stage Mature Regulation Level Heavy Revenue Volatility Low Technology Change High Capital Intensity Low Barriers to Entry High Industry Assistance High Industry Globalization High Concentration Level Medium Competition Level High FOR ADDITIONAL STATISTICS AND TIME SERIES SEE THE APPENDIX ON PAGE 38 Provided to: Seattle Pacific University (2134440152) | 03 December 2019 WWW.IBISWORLD.COM Investment Banking & Securities Dealing in the US June 2019 4 Industry Performance Executive Summary | Key External Drivers | Current Performance Industry Outlook | Life Cycle Stage Executive Summary Strong returns in various financial explaining the industry’s declining markets and continued macroeconomic revenue from FICC, the most significant growth have benefited operators in the of which is regulatory change. Among the Investment Banking and Securities most important legislative changes is the Dealing industry over the five years to Volcker Rule, which restricts bank- 2019. Operators provide underwriting, holding companies with federally insured originating and market-making services deposits from proprietary trading. for a range of financial instruments Additionally, higher capital requirements including bonds, stocks and derivatives. and the trend of transitioning derivative Revenue growth was hindered during trading to central clearinghouses are most of the current period due to anticipated to structurally dampen the structural changes to the trading services industry’s FICC revenue. This trend led that industry operators were permitted to industry revenue growth to remain conduct. However, operators have muted during the early portion of the period, despite rising fees from investment banking services. Operators have benefited from numerous These changes have forced the industry’s trends, including increased demand for initial smaller operators to evolve. Since competing in FICC requires scale and massive public offerings from private companies investments in technology and compliance, boutique investment banks have benefited from numerous trends, alternatively focused on merger and including increased demand for initial acquisition (M&A) advising, increasing their public offerings from private companies. share of this product line from 25.0% in Overall, industry revenue has increased an 2010 to 29.0% in 2014, according to the annualized 2.6% to $133.1 billion over the Economist. As a result, boutique investment five years to 2019, including 4.2% growth banks’ total share of M&A revenue is in 2019 alone. Similarly, industry profit forecast to continue growing over the five has expanded over the past five years, years to 2024. Furthermore, the industry as primarily due to increased advisory fees. a whole is projected to continue benefiting Early during the current period, from continued macroeconomic activity and industry revenue was stymied as a result rising interest rates during the outlook of declining fixed income, commodities period. Overall, industry revenue is forecast and currencies (FICC) trading revenue. to rise an annualized 2.3% to $149.4 billion Several structural trends are crucial in over the next five years. Key External Drivers Corporate profit Initial public offerings Changes in corporate profit influence Investment banks help companies raise the performance of equities markets capital by underwriting their first sale of because they affect how companies are stock (equity) to public investors; this is valued, which in turn influences trading known as an initial public offering (IPO). and business activity. Higher trading A high number of IPOs represents and business activity levels enable increased business demand for capital, investment banks to earn higher which leads to higher underwriting trading, underwriting and advisory revenue for the industry. The number of revenue. Corporate profit is expected to IPOs is expected to decrease in 2019, increase in 2019. posing a threat to the industry. Provided to: Seattle Pacific University (2134440152) | 03 December 2019 WWW.IBISWORLD.COM Investment Banking & Securities Dealing in the US June 2019 5 Industry Performance Key External Drivers S&P 500 Investor uncertainty continued The performance of the stock market Investor uncertainty is an important heavily influences revenue for industry measure of business sentiment and affects operators. When equities markets are trading activity. Low investor uncertainty performing well, the industry generates creates a favorable environment for initial more revenue from trading activities and public offerings, mergers and experiences increased demand from acquisitions and trading activity. As a downstream clients for strategic advisory result, declines in this index generally services. The S&P 500 index is expected precede periods of strong industry to increase in 2019, representing a performance. Investor uncertainty is potential opportunity for the industry. expected to decrease in 2019. Corporate profit Initial public offerings 12 100 80 8 60 4 40 $ billion % change 0 20 -4 0 Year 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 Year 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 SOURCE: WWW.IBISWORLD.COM Provided to: Seattle Pacific University (2134440152) | 03 December
Recommended publications
  • Assessing the Effectiveness and Impact of Central Bank and Supervisory Policies in Greening the Financial System
    INSPIRE Theme 6 Assessing the effectiveness and impact of central bank and supervisory policies in greening the financial system Overview of the projects funded under the third call for research proposals September 2020 PROJECT Energy transition intersectoral dependencies under different monetary and supervisory policy scenarios Moutaz Altaghlibi a and Rens van Tilberga a Sustainable Finance Lab, Utrecht University, The Netherlands As we transition our economies to a low carbon path, climate related transition risks to the financial sector pose a challenge to policy makers in their policy design. The unprecedented climate challenge requires the use and the development of new tools in order to quantify these risks and investigate the role of different policies to steer the transition in the right direction. Central banks and financial regulators can play an essential role in facilitating a successful transition by directing the funds needed to achieve this transition in the right direction and in a timely manner. However, any intervention by central banks should be evaluated across sectors and across scenarios in order to guarantee the effectiveness, efficiency and coherence with fiscal policies. Our methodology is scenario analysis based on a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model. Our CGE model allows us to capture feedback loops across sectors, along with tracking the change in prices and quantities following an exogenous change in policies, technologies, or consumer preferences. Moreover, in order to capture both risks and opportunities associated to the transition process, our model distinguishes between green and grey sub-sectors. It also uses sector-specific capital stocks which allows us to differentiate the cost of capital across sectors/scenarios.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Strategy
    Corporate Summary Executive Messages Business Strategy Summary of the Daiwa Securities Group’s Medium-Term Management Plan Business “Passion for the Best” 2014 14 Strategy Interview with the CEO 16 Message from the COO 20 Management Systems At a Glance 22 Retail Division 24 Wholesale Division 26 Asset Management Division 28 Investment Division 30 IT/Think Tank Division 31 Financial Section Other Information Daiwa Securities Group Annual Report 2013 13 Summary of the Daiwa Securities Group’s Medium-Term Management Plan “Passion for the Best” 2014 Daiwa Securities Group Management Vision • To become Asia’s leading financial services firm possessing and leveraging a solid business platform in Japan • Establish a robust business structure capable of securing profit even under stressful economic conditions Daiwa Securities Group Basic Management Policy • Achieve sustainable growth by linking Japan and the growth of Asia Outline of Medium-Term Management Plan • Establish a robust business structure immune to the external environment and aspire to achieve sound growth based on a new growth strategy “Passion for the Best” 2014 Milestones FY2012 Turnaround FY2013 Growth Management Targets Consolidated Ordinary Income [Initial FY] Return to Profitability Basic Policy I: Return to profitability by pursuing management efficiencies (Focus of execution in the first fiscal year) R Steadily implement the plan to reduce SG&A R Realize greater organizational efficiencies by shifting personnel from the middle and back offices to the front divisions Basic
    [Show full text]
  • Are Universal Banks Better Underwriters? Evidence from the Last Days of the Glass-Steagall Act
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Focarelli, Dario; Marqués-Ibáñez, David; Pozzolo, Alberto Franco Working Paper Are universal banks better underwriters? Evidence from the last days of the Glass-Steagall Act ECB Working Paper, No. 1287 Provided in Cooperation with: European Central Bank (ECB) Suggested Citation: Focarelli, Dario; Marqués-Ibáñez, David; Pozzolo, Alberto Franco (2011) : Are universal banks better underwriters? Evidence from the last days of the Glass-Steagall Act, ECB Working Paper, No. 1287, European Central Bank (ECB), Frankfurt a. M. This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/153721 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten
    [Show full text]
  • The Bank Holding Company Act of 1956
    THE BANK HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1956 T HE Bank Holding Company Act of 1956,1 designed principally to regulate the expansion of bank holding companies and to insure the separation of banking and nonbanking enterprises,' is perhaps the most important banking legislation of the past two decades. The im- mediate economic consequences of the act are themselves deserving of comment, 3 but, even more significantly, the act represents the first comprehensive congressional action with regard to multiple banking through the use of the holding company. Though of comparatively recent origin,4 the bank holding company device has become as prom- inent as both the other forms of multiple banking, chains5 and branches,6 largely because of the economic inadequacies of the former 7 and the legal restrictions imposed upon the latter.8 A brief historical survey of bank holding company -development will serve to highlight an analysis of the act itself. Historically, the independent, unit bank, with its welfare dependent upon the economic health of the small area it serves, has too frequently been unable to withstand the adverse affect of even brief, localized eco- nomic depression2 Particularly in the small towns of the agrarian West and South during the i92O's and 193O's, bank suspensions occurred at an astonishing rate." Some form of multiple banking which could 70 STAT. 133, 12 U.S.C.A. §§ 1841-48 (Supp. 1956). sS. REP. No. 1095, 84 th Cong., ist Sess. 2 (.955). s See note 131 infra. 'The first independently capitalized bank holding company was the Marine Ban- corporation organized in Seattle, Washington in 1927.
    [Show full text]
  • The Technical Interview Guide to Investment Banking
    k Trim Size: 7in x 10in Pignataro ffirs.tex V1 - 01/10/2017 5:21pm Pagei The Technical Interview Guide to Investment Banking k k k k Trim Size: 7in x 10in Pignataro ffirs.tex V1 - 01/10/2017 5:21pm Page ii The Wiley Finance series contains books written specifically for finance and investment professionals as well as sophisticated individual investors and their financial advisors. Book topics range from portfolio management to e-commerce, risk management, finan- cial engineering, valuation and financial instrument analysis, as well as much more. For a list of available titles, visit our Web site at www.WileyFinance.com. Founded in 1807, John Wiley & Sons is the oldest independent publishing company in the United States. With offices in North America, Europe, Australia and Asia, Wiley is globally committed to developing and marketing print and electronic products and services for our customers’ professional and personal knowledge and understanding. k k k k Trim Size: 7in x 10in Pignataro ffirs.tex V1 - 01/10/2017 5:21pm Page iii The Technical Interview Guide to Investment Banking PAUL PIGNATARO k k k k Trim Size: 7in x 10in Pignataro ffirs.tex V1 - 01/10/2017 5:21pm Page iv Copyright © 2017 by Paul Pignataro. All rights reserved. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Published simultaneously in Canada. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750–8400, fax (978) 646–8600, or on the Web at www.copyright.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Bankmobile Technologies, a Subsidiary of Customers Bank, and Megalith Financial Acquisition Corp
    BankMobile Technologies, a Subsidiary of Customers Bank, and Megalith Financial Acquisition Corp. Agree to Combine to Bring a Digital Banking Platform to the Public Market under the New Name BM Technologies BankMobile is one of the largest digital banking platforms in the country with over 2 million accounts BankMobile Management to Lead Combined Company MFAC has Binding Commitments for a $20 Million Private Placement for the Business Combination Transaction Enterprise Value of $140 Million Investor Calls on Thursday August 6th: MFAC and BankMobile Technologies at 2pm; Customers Bancorp at 4pm NEW YORK, NY, Aug. 06, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- BankMobile Technologies, a subsidiary of Customers Bank, and one of America’s largest digital banking platforms, and Megalith Financial Acquisition Corp (NYSE: MFAC) (“MFAC”), a special purpose acquisition company, announced today that they have entered into a definitive merger agreement. Upon closing of the transaction, the combined company (the “Company”) will operate as BM Technologies Inc. and expects to be listed on the NYSE. The transaction reflects an enterprise value for the Company of $140 million. All BMT serviced deposits and loans will remain at Customers Bank immediately after the closing of the transaction. Upon the closing of the transaction, BM Technologies will be a financial technology company bringing banks and business partners together through its digital banking platform. With over 2 million accounts, BankMobile Technology, Inc. (“BMT” or “BankMobile”) is one of the largest digital banking platforms in the country. Launched in January 2015, BankMobile’s mission has been to provide a compliant, mobile-first banking experience that is simple, affordable, and consumer-friendly.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    Index A general business overview, 153 Accounting, introduction to, 56–58 management’s discussion and financial, 56 analysis (MD&A), 153–154 generally accepted accounting Apple Inc. principles (GAAP), 57–58 Income statement example, 68 managerial, 57 balance sheet example, 81–83 tax, 56–57 statement of cash flows example, Accounts payable (AP), 73–74 86–87 days, 168–169 Asset managers, 106–107 Accounts receivable (AR), 70 Asset management, 7 days, 168 Asset purchase, 301–302 Accretion/dilution analysis, 311–319 Assets, 69–72 impact of P/E ratios on, 318–319 current, 70–71 Accrual basis of accounting, 59–60 accounts receivable (AR), 70 Accrued expenses, 74 cash and equivalents, 70 Acquisition comps, 211–214 inventories, 70 selecting, 211–212 prepaid expenses, 71 criteria for, 211–212 noncurrent (long-term), 71–72 sources for, 211 intangible, 72 spreading and normalizing, 212–214 property, plant, and equipment Activity ratios, 167–169 (PP&E), 71–72 accounts payable days, 168–169 Associates, 24–25, 39–40, 45 accounts receivable days, 168 compensation, 45 days sales of inventory, 168 exit opportunities for, 46–47 inventory turnover, 168 Amortization, 314–315 B Analysis at various prices (AVP), Balance sheet, 69–83, 90–99, 275–281, 320–321 336–340 Analysts, 23–24,COPYRIGHTED 39, 44 assets, MATERIAL 69–72 compensation, 44 current, 70–71 exit opportunities for, 46 noncurrent (long-term), 71–72 Annual report (SEC Schedule 10-K), consolidation and noncontrolling 149–150, 152–155 interest, 81 cover, 152–153 deferred tax assets and liabilities,
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Banking and Security Market Development: Does Finance
    Investment Banking and Security Market Development: Does Finance Follow Industry?∗ Bharat N. Anand† Alexander Galetovic‡ Harvard University Universidad de Chile February 2001 Abstract This paper looks at the industrial organization of the investment banking industry. Long- term relationships between business firms and investment banks are pervasive in developed security markets. A vast literature argues that better monitoring and information result from relationships. Thus, security markets should allocate resources better when an investment bank- ing industry exists. We study necessary conditions for sustainable relationships and then explore whether policy can do something to foster them. We argue that the structure of investment banking is determined by the economics of the technology of relationships: (i) Sunk set up cost to establish a relationship. (ii) The firm pays the investment bank only when it does a deal. (iii) To a significant degree the investment bank cannot prevent other banks from free riding on the information created by the relationship. Then: (a) Relationships can emerge in equilibrium only if the industry is an oligopoly of large investment banks with similar market shares. (b) Relationships are for large firms–small firms are rationed out of relationships by investment banks. (c) Scale economies due to entry costs are irrelevant when the market is large but can prevent an industry from emerging when the market is small. While policy can probably remove obstacles that increase the costs of relationships, the size- distribution of business firms determines whether an investment banking industry is feasible: it will not emerge if large firms are few. In this sense, “finance follows industry.” Large firms can escape this limitation by listing in foreign developed security markets.
    [Show full text]
  • FINANCIAL MODELING, INTERVIEW PREP, and TECHNICAL SKILLS DEVELOPMENT 1 Bridging the Gap: Financial Modeling, Interview Prep, and Technical Skills Development
    BRIDGING THE GAP: FINANCIAL MODELING, INTERVIEW PREP, AND TECHNICAL SKILLS DEVELOPMENT 1 Bridging the Gap: Financial Modeling, Interview Prep, and Technical Skills Development Training programs for post-secondary students seeking roles in business and corporate finance EXPERTS IN FINANCIAL MODELING TRAINING [email protected] · +1 416 583 1802 WWW.MARQUEEGROUP.CA BRIDGING THE GAP: FINANCIAL MODELING, INTERVIEW PREP, AND TECHNICAL SKILLS DEVELOPMENT 2 About The Marquee Group Our Clients We believe that spreadsheet- based financial models are For several years, Marquee has led the annual the most important tools in training programs at numerous investment modern finance. Using our banks, pension funds and commercial banks. framework and discipline We have taught thousands of professionals all to develop best-in-class, across Canada, the United States, the United user-friendly models, we Kingdom, Mexico, Australia and China. help students and finance The following table highlights some of our professionals turn their models major clients: into powerful communication tools that lead to better, more UNIVERSITIES effective decisions. Acadia University Saint Mary’s University Brandeis University U of T - Rotman The Marquee Group is the only Dalhousie - Rowe UBC dedicated financial modeling firm HEC Waterloo in Canada. For over a decade, our McGill - Desautels Western - Ivey business has delivered what has McMaster - DeGroote York - Schulich become the industry standard Queen’s - Smith in financial modeling, training, SOCIETIES FINANCIAL consulting
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the History of Bank Holding Company Regulation in the United States
    2011-2012 THAT WHICH WE CALL A BANK 113 THAT WHICH WE CALL A BANK: REVISITING THE HISTORY OF BANK HOLDING COMPANY REGULATION IN THE UNITED STATES SAULE T. OMAROVA* ** MARGARET E. TAHYAR Introduction ....................................................................... 114 I. Background: Bank Holding Company Regulation in the United States ...................................................................... 117 A. The BHCA Statutory Scheme: Brief Overview ............ 118 B. The Shifting Policy Focus of the BHCA ....................... 120 II. Back to the Beginning: The Birth of the Statute ................ 129 III. Who Is In? The Evolution of the Statutory Definition of “Bank” ............................................................................... 138 A. The 1966 Amendments ................................................. 139 B. The 1970 Amendments ................................................. 142 C. The Competitive Equality Banking Act of 1987 ........... 153 IV. Who Is Out? Exemptions from the Definition of “Bank” under the BHCA ................................................................. 158 A. Industrial Loan Corporations ........................................ 158 B. Credit Card Banks ......................................................... 169 C. Limited Purpose Trust Companies ................................ 173 D. Credit Unions ................................................................ 174 E. Savings Associations ..................................................... 179 V. Looking Back, Thinking Forward:
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Banks, Scope, and Unavoidable Conflicts of Interest
    Investment Banks, Scope, and Unavoidable Conflicts of Interest ERIK SIRRI The author is a professor of finance and holder of the Walter H. Carpenter Chair at Babson College in Wellesley, Massachusetts. He thanks Jennifer Bethel and Laurie Krigman for helpful discussions. This paper was presented at the Atlanta Fed’s 2004 Financial Markets Conference, “Wall Street Against the Wall: Transparency and Conflicts of Interest.” There are certain sweet-smelling sugar-coated lies current in the world which all politic men have apparently tacitly conspired together to support and perpetuate. One of these is, that there is such a thing in the world as independence: independence of thought, indepen- dence of opinion, independence of action. Another is that the world loves to see independence—admires it, applauds it. —Mark Twain1 he investment banking community has tomers access to the research products of at least recently been the object of scorn, both three independent research firms for five years. on the regulatory front and in the press. These conflicts of interest are nothing new, and Critics have alleged a distinct lack of their existence was widely known throughout the independence in banks’ behavior and financial community. The conflicts are a consequence policies with regard to the objective- of the function of investment banks, which interme- nessT and independence of the research reports and diate the interaction between issuers and investors analyst recommendations. Retail investors, institu- in capital markets. Why the issue came to the fore tional investors, federal and state regulators, and in the last few years is debatable, but certainly con- Congress have expressed outrage over the conflicts tributing factors include the sharp market decline of interest that can exist in these large banks.
    [Show full text]
  • Equities Business Overview PRESENTATION to HYPERLEDGER CAPITAL MARKETS SIG JUNE 17TH 2020
    Equities Business Overview PRESENTATION TO HYPERLEDGER CAPITAL MARKETS SIG JUNE 17TH 2020 Presented by: Junji Katto Sateesh Vidhyanadhan 1 Agenda 1. Holistic View of Capital Markets 2. What are equities 3. Equities Trade Lifecycle 4. Current Equities Trading and Settlement Process 5. Challenges in Capital Markets 6. Key problems to solve 7. Blockchain Potential Benefits 8. Sample implementations 2 Holistic view of Capital Markets A capital market is a financial market in which long-term debt or equity-backed securities are bought and sold. Capital market refers to a broad spectrum of tradeable assets that includes the stock market as well as other venues for trading different financial products. The stock market allows investors and banking institutions to trade stocks, either publicly or privately. Stocks are financial instruments that represent partial ownership of a company. These documents are used extensively by companies as a means of raising capital. Within the stock market itself are primary and secondary markets that trade among banks underwriting stock and public investors trading stock, respectively. The Sales & Trading Division of the Investment Bank connects Investment Banks are intermediaries between buyers and sellers of stocks, bonds, commodities and other the providers of funding (investors-in the form of assets. Salespeople and traders sit on a trading floor. both debt and equities investors) and the users The trading floor is split out by asset class. Any large of funding (corporates, financial institutions, investment banks has following roles hedge funds, supranational, municipals and Front office Sales & Trading : governments). When talking about investment 1. Sales Traders – Client orders and contract management banking, it is important to know the difference 2.
    [Show full text]