DOCSLIB.ORG

SUPLEMENTO DEFINITIVO. Los Valores Descritos En Este

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SUPLEMENTO DEFINITIVO. Los Valores Descritos En Este SUPLEMENTO DEFINITIVO. Los valores descritos en este suplemento han sido registrados en el Registro Nacional de Valores que lleva la Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores. Dichos valores no podrán ser ofrecidos ni vendidos fuera de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, a menos que sea permitido por las leyes de otros países. Banco Invex, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Invex Grupo Financiero, en su calidad de fiduciario del Contrato de Fideicomiso Irrevocable F/2061 Con base en el programa de colocación (el “Programa”) de certificados bursátiles fiduciarios de corto y largo plazo establecido por Banco Invex, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Invex Grupo Financiero, en su calidad de fiduciario del Contrato de Fideicomiso Irrevocable F/2061 (“FHipo”, el “Emisor” o la “Emisora”, indistintamente), descrito en el prospecto de dicho Programa con carácter revolvente por un monto de hasta $15,000’000,000.00 M.N. o su equivalente en unidades de inversión (“UDIs”), se lleva a cabo la presente oferta pública (la “Oferta”) de 9,000,000 de certificados bursátiles fiduciarios, con valor nominal de $100.00 M.N. cada uno. Los términos que inician con mayúscula inicial, y que no se encuentran expresamente definidos en el presente, tendrán el significado que se les atribuye en la sección I. INFORMACIÓN GENERAL – 1. Glosario de Términos y Definiciones, del prospecto. MONTO TOTAL DE LA OFERTAA: $900,000,000.00 M.N. NÚMERO DE CERTIFICADOS BURSÁTILES FIDUCIARIOS: 9,000,000 CERTIFICADOS BUURSÁTILES FIDUCIARIOS Denominación Social de la Banco Invex, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Invex Grupo Financiero, en su Emisora: calidad de fiduciario del Contratto de Fideicomiso Irrevocable F/2061. Contrato de Fideicomiso: Contrato de Fideicomiso Irrevocable identificado con el número F/2061, de fecha 3 de julio de 2014, celebrado entre la Emisora, Concentradora Hipotecaria, S.A.P.I. de C.V. y Monex Casa de Bolsa S.A. de C.V., Monex Grupo Financiero (el “Contrato de Fideicomiso”). Clave de Pizarra: “FHIPO 17” Monto total autorizado del Hasta $15,000’000,000.00 M.N. o su equivalente en UDIs. Programa con carácter revolvente: Tipo de valor: Certificados bursátiles fiduciarios (los “Certificados Bursátiles”). Tipo de Oferta: Primaria, nacional. Número de emisión al Segunda emisión de largo plazo al amparo del Programa (la “Emisión”). amparo del Programa: Número Total de 9,000,000; en el entendido que no existen disposiciones por medio de las cuales Certificados Bursátiles a ser pueda incrementarse el númerro de Certificados Bursátiles sin la autorización de los Emitidos: Tenedores. Plazo de vigencia del 5 años contados a partir del 31 de marzo de 2016, fecha en que la Comisión Nacional Programa: Bancaria y de Valores autorizó el Programa. Fideicomitente y Asesor y Concentradora Hipotecaria, S.A.P.I. de C.V. Administrador: Fideicomisarios en Primer Los tenedores de los CBFIs. Lugar: Fideicomisario en Segundo Concentradora Hipotecaria, S.A.P.I. de C.V. Lugar: Bienes, Derechos o Valores Los Portafolios Hipotecarios y/o cualesquiera otros bienes derivados de o que resulten Fideicomitidos: de las inversiones que realice lla Emisora, incluyendo cualquier ingreso, devolución y flujo de efectivo que reciba la Emisora el relación con lo anterior. Derechos que los Los Tenedores tendrán derecho a recibir el pago del principal, de los intereses Certificados Bursátiles ordinarios y, en su caso, de los intereses moratorios correspondientes. confieren a los Tenedores: Plazo de vigencia de la 12,782 días, equivalentes a aproximadamente 35 años. Emisión: Denominación de los Los Certificados Bursátiles estarán denominados en Pesos. Certificados Bursátiles: Valor Nominal de los $100.00 M.N. cada uno. Certificados Bursátiles: Precio de Colocación: $100.00 M.N. cada uno. Monto de la Emisión: $900,000,000.00 M.N. Fecha de publicación del 7 de marzo de 2017. Aviso de Oferta Pública: Fecha de Cierre de Libro: 8 de marzo de 2017. Fecha de publicación del 8 de marzo de 2017. Aviso de Colocación para fines informativos: Fecha de la Oferta: 8 de marzo de 2017. Fecha de Emisión: 10 de marzo de 2017. Fecha de listado en BMV: 10 de marzo de 2017. Fecha de Cruce y 10 de marzo de 2017. Liquidación: Fecha de Vencimiento: 8 de marzo de 2052. Mecanismo de Colocación: Los Certificados Bursátiles se colocarán mediante un proceso de asignación discrecional a tasa única (cierre de libro tradicional). Recursos Netos que $889,883,892.39 M.N. Para mayor detalle ver “LA OFERTA. 6. Gastos Relacionados obtendrá la Emisora con la con la Oferta” del presente Suplemento. Colocación: Destino de los Recursos: Los recursos que la Emisora obtenga de la colocación de los Certificados Bursátiles de la segunda emisión al amparo del Programa serán destinados a los fines que se describen en el apartado “LA OFERTA. 3. Destino de los Recursos”, del presente Suplemento. Garantía: El pago oportuno y total de los intereses y principal bajo los Certificados Bursátiles está garantizado mediante (i) el contrato de fideicomiso irrevocable de garantía administración y fuente de pago identificado con el número F/2880 del 11 de agosto de 2016, celebrado entre la Emisora, como fideicomitente y fideicomisario en segundo lugar; Banco Invex, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple Invex Grupo Financiero, como fiduciario; y el Representante Común, como fideicomisario inicial (según el mismo sea modificado, ya sea parcial o totalmente, adicionado o de cualquier otra forma reformado, renovado o prorrogado en cualquier momento, el “Fideicomiso de Garantía”), del cual se anexa una copia al presente Suplemento; y (ii) el suplemento al Fideicomiso de Garantía del 3 de marzo de 2017, celebrado entre la Emisora, como fideicomitente y fideicomisario en segundo lugar; Banco Invex, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple Invex Grupo Financiero, como fiduciario y el Representante Común, en dicho carácter, (según el mismo sea modificado, ya sea parcial o totalmente, adicionado o de cualquier otra forma reformado, renovado o prorrogado en cualquier momento (el “Suplemento al Fideicomiso 2017-1”) del cual se anexa una copia al presente Suplemento. El contenido del Fideicomiso de Garantía y del Suplemento al Fideicomiso 2017-1 se describe a en el apartado “LA OFERTA. 2. Garantías de la Emisión” del presente Suplemento. Calificación otorgada por “Aaa.mx” en escala nacional de México. Esta calificación muestra la capacidad Moody’s de México, S.A. de crediticia más fuerte y la menor probabilidad de pérdida de crédito con respecto a C.V.: otras emisiones nacionales. Esta calificación no constituye una recomendación de inversión, y que puede estar sujeta a actualizaciones en cualquier momento, de conformidad con las metodologías de la agencia calificadora. Calificación otorgada por HR ”HR AAA (E)”. Dicha calificación significa que la Emisión se considera de la más alta Ratings de México, S.A. de calidad crediticia, ofreciendo gran seguridad para el pago oportuno de las obligaciones C.V.: de deuda. Mantiene mínimo riesgo crediticio. Esta calificación no constituye una recomendación de inversión, y que puede estar sujeta a actualizaciones en cualquier momento, de conformidad con las metodologías de la agencia calificadora. Forma de cálculo de los A partir de la fecha de Emisión y en tanto no sean amortizados en su totalidad, los intereses: Certificados Bursátiles generarán un interés bruto anual fijo sobre su valor nominal o, en su caso, sobre el Saldo Principal Insoluto de los Certificados Bursátiles, que el Representante Común calculará 2 días hábiles previos cada Fecha de Pago de Intereses, utilizando la Tasa de Interés Bruto Anual, la cual se mantendrá fija durante la vigencia de la Emisión, de conformidad con lo establecido en el párrafo siguiente. Para efectos del presente Suplemento la “Tasa de Interés Bruto Anual” significa, para las primeras 10 Fechas de Pago de Intereses, 8.78%, y para cualquier Fecha de Pago de Intereses posterior, el porcentaje que resulte de sumar a dicho porcentaje, 1.00%. El interés que devenguen los Certificados Bursátiles se computará a partir de su fecha de Emisión o al inicio de cada periodo de intereses, según sea el caso, y los cálculos para determinar el monto de los intereses a pagar deberán comprender los días naturales efectivamente transcurridos hasta la Fecha de Pago de Intereses correspondiente, o en caso de que dicha fecha no sea un día hábil, el día hábil inmediato siguiente. Los cálculos se efectuarán cerrándose a centésimas. Los intereses ordinarios que devenguen los Certificados Bursátiles se liquidarán en la forma indicada en la sección “Periodicidad en el Pago de Intereses” más adelante. Para determinar el monto de intereses pagaderos en cada Fecha de Pago de Intereses, el Representante Común utilizará la fórmula establecida en el Título y que se reproduce en este Suplemento. El Representante Común dará a conocer por escrito a la CNBV, al S.D. Indeval Institución para el Depósito de Valores, S.A. de C.V. (“Indeval”) y a la Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A.B. de C.V. (“BMV”) a través del Sistema Electrónico de Envío y Difusión de Información de la BMV (“SEDI” o “EMISNET”) (o cualesquiera otros medios que la BMV determine) con 2 días hábiles de anticipación a la Fecha de Pago de Intereses, el importe de los intereses a pagar por el Emisor a los Tenedores. Los Certificados Bursátiles dejarán de devengar intereses a partir de la fecha señalada para su pago, siempre que la Emisora hubiere constituido el depósito del importe de la amortización y, en su caso, de los intereses correspondientes, en las oficinas del Indeval, a más tardar a las 11:00 a.m. de ese día. En los términos del artículo 282 de la LMV, la Emisora determina que el Título no lleve cupones adheridos, de tal forma que las constancias que Indeval expida para tal efecto, harán las veces de dichos cupones para todos los efectos legales.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ACADEMIC PROGRAM 2018 ASOR ANNUAL MEETING the Denver Marriott Tech Center, Denver, Colorado
    ACADEMIC PROGRAM 2018 ASOR ANNUAL MEETING The Denver Marriott Tech Center, Denver, Colorado *Please note that times and rooms are subject to change * The presenter’s name will be underlined when they are not the first author Wednesday, November 14 7:00–8:15pm Plenary Address Evergreen Ballroom Hélène Sader (American University of Beirut), “Between Looters, Private Collectors, and Warlords: Does Archaeology Stand a Chance?” 8:30–10:00pm Opening Reception Rocky Mountain Event Center Thursday, November 15 8:20–10:25am Session 1 1A. Ancient Inscriptions I Evergreen A CHAIRS: Michael Langlois (University of Strasbourg) and Anat Mendel-Geberovich (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Israel Antiquities Authority) PRESENTERS: 8:20 Aren Wilson-Wright (University of Zurich), “Semitic Letter Names in Group Writing: A Reevaluation of the Halaḥam-Ostracon from TT99” (20 min.) 8:45 Jean-Philippe Delorme (University of Toronto), “A Place Among the Baals/Lords? A New Reading of the Sarcophagus Inscription of Aḫirōm, King of Byblos (KAI 1:1)” (20 min.) 9:10 Andrew Burlingame (University of Chicago), “The Head and Pectoral Inscriptions of Eshmunazor’s Sarcophagus (AO 4806 = KAI 14)” (20 min.) 9:35 Shirly Ben Dor Evian (Israel Museum), “Sheshonq at Megiddo: A New Interpretation” (20 min.) 10:00 Fokelien Kootstra (Leiden University), “Analyzing Variation: Statistical Methods and Dadanitic epigraphy” (20 min.) 1B. Archaeology and Biblical Studies I Evergreen B Theme: This session explores the intersections between and among history, archaeology, and the Jewish and/or Christian Bibles and related texts. CHAIR: Jonathan Rosenbaum (Gratz College) PRESENTERS: 8:20 Erez Ben-Yosef (Tel Aviv University), “Throwing the Baby Out with the Bathwater: On a Prevailing Methodological Flaw in the Treatment of Nomads in Current Biblical Archaeology” (20 min.) 8:45 Peter Feinman (Institute of History, Archaeology, and Education), “What Happened on October 30, 1207 B.C.E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Names and Boundaries of Eretz-Israel (Palestine) As Reflections of Stages in Its History
    THE NAMES AND BOUNDARIES OF ERETZ-ISRAEL (PALESTINE) AS REFLECTIONS OF STAGES IN ITS HISTORY GIDEON BIGER INTRODUCTION Classical historical geography focuses on research of the boundaries of the various states, along with the historical development of these boundaries over time. Edward Freeman, in his book written in 1881 and entitled The Historical Geography of Europe, defines the nature of historical-geographical research as follows: "The work which we have now before us is to trace out the extent of territory which the different states and nations have held at different times in the world's history, to mark the different boundaries which the same country has had and the different meanings in which the same name has been used." The author further claims that "it is of great importance carefully to make these distinctions, because great mistakes as to the facts of history are often caused through men thinking and speaking as if the names of different countries have always meant exactly the same extent of territory. "1 Although this approach - which regards research on boundaries as the essence of historical geography- is not accepted at present, the claim that it is necessary to define the extent of territory over history is as valid today as ever. It is impossible to discuss the development of any geographical area having political and territorial significance without knowing and understanding its physical extent. Of no less significance for such research are the names attached to any particular expanse. The naming of a place is the first step in defining it politically and historically.
    [Show full text]
  • Caesarea-Ratzlaff201
    The Plurality of Harbors at Caesarea: The Southern Anchorage in Late Antiquity Alexandra Ratzlaff, Ehud Galili, Paula Waiman-Barak & Assaf Yasur-Landau Journal of Maritime Archaeology ISSN 1557-2285 Volume 12 Number 2 J Mari Arch (2017) 12:125-146 DOI 10.1007/s11457-017-9173-z 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self- archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy J Mari Arch (2017) 12:125–146 DOI 10.1007/s11457-017-9173-z ORIGINAL PAPER The Plurality of Harbors at Caesarea: The Southern Anchorage in Late Antiquity 1 2 3 Alexandra Ratzlaff • Ehud Galili • Paula Waiman-Barak • Assaf Yasur-Landau1 Published online: 1 August 2017 Ó Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017 Abstract The engineering marvel of Sebastos, or Portus Augusti as it was called in Late Antiquity (284–638 CE), dominated Caesarea’s harbor center along modern Israel’s central coast but it was only one part of a larger maritime complex.
    [Show full text]
  • BYZANTIUM and EARLY ISLAM: EXPLORING the LATE ANTIQUE TRANSITION a Conference at Macalester College, Saint Paul, MN, USA
    BYZANTIUM AND EARLY ISLAM: EXPLORING THE LATE ANTIQUE TRANSITION A Conference at Macalester College, Saint Paul, MN, USA April 13-14, 2018 Times and Locations: Friday, April 13: 12:30 – 5:00 PM John B. Davis Hall, Lower Level, Ruth Stricker-Dayton Campus Center Saturday, April 14: 8:30 – 1:00 PM Weyerhaeuser Board Room, First Floor, the Weyerhaeuser Building Friday, April 13: 12:30 – 5:00 PM, John B. Davis Lecture Hall, Lower Level, Ruth Stricker-Dayton Campus Center WELCOME and INTRODUCTION PANEL I 12:30 PM J. Andrew Overman, Macalester College Muhammad, Charlemagne and Abu Abbas: The Transition at One Hundred Gideon Avni, Israel Antiquities Authority/The Hebrew University, Jerusalem Archaeological evidence for religious interactions? Some case studies from Early Islamic Palestine. PANEL II 2:00 PM Jeanne-Nicole Saint-Laurent, Marquette University Encountering Heroes of Syriac Hagiography: Slaves, Camels, Martyrs, and the Digital Humanities. Wessam Elmeligi, Macalester College Forgotten Voices: Pre-Islamic and Early Islamic Women Poets. Walid Atrash, Israel Antiquities Authority, Jerusalem The Early Islamic Period in Jund Urdunn: Tabariyya and Beisan. PANEL III 4:00 PM – Student Panel Autumn DeLong Conceptualizing the Virgin Mary: An Exegetical Analysis of Mary’s Role in the Christian and Muslim Traditions Jordan Schwed A Bridge to a New Age: Christian Doctors in the Early Islamic World Kaleb Mazurek A Philosophy of a Diplomat Messenger: An Analysis of ibn Al-Farra’s Treatise: Kitab Rusul al Muluk Saturday, April 14: 8:30 – 1:00 PM, Weyerhaeuser Board Room, First Floor, the Weyerhaeuser Building PANEL I 8:30 AM Serdar Yalcin, Art History, Macalester College The Abbasid Period in Early Medieval Tarsus: A Field Report Mark Schuler, Concordia University, St.
    [Show full text]
  • THE END of PAGAN TEMPLES in ROMAN PALESTINE Gregory
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: THE END OF PAGAN TEMPLES IN ROMAN PALESTINE Gregory William Stoehr, Doctor of Philosophy, 2018 Dissertation directed by: Professor Hayim Lapin, Department of History I am investigating fate of polytheist temples in Late Antique Roman Palestine, with a primary focus on the archaeological remains of the temples themselves. This focus is a deliberate effort to steer the conversation about “Christianization” and the “end of paganism” into the domain of empirical evidence. The inner religious states of individuals, and hence populations, confound efforts at quantification. Thus, this dissertation is instead an accounting of the fate of the public venues that were used by pagans, for specific ritual behavior that enhanced status, in what was the most significant part of the Empire in terms of the history of Christianity. Ancient Palestine in the third and early fourth centuries was part of the normal Mediterranean pagan milieu. Cities such as Bet Shean, Aelia Capitolina, and Caesarea Maritima provide us with evidence for dozens of pagan temples. This study finds evidence for forty-four temples. There were certainly many more than those for which we have evidence. All of these pagan temples eventually went out of commission. Only three temples in Palestine had endings that were remarkable enough to be preserved in the literary record. The ending of the rest was far less dramatic, if we even know about it. A combination of neglect, natural disaster, extended quarrying through time, and encroachment of ritual space by other buildings was significantly more common than more dramatic scenarios that involved overt social conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • BYZANTIUM and the ARABS in the SIXTH CENTURY Volume 2 | Part 2
    BYZANTIUM AND THE ARABS IN THE SIXTH CENTURY Volume 2 | Part 2 IRFAN SHAHÎD BYZANTIUM AND THE ARABS IN THE SIXTH CENTURY A mosaic in the floor of the southern sacristy of the Church of St. George at Mt. Nebo. It is dated 536 and so its Arabic term, bi-salām, illustrates the calligraphic expression of the Arabic script in pre-Islamic times, as discussed in the chapter on Calligraphy in this volume. BYZANTIUM AND THE ARABS IN THE SIXTH CENTURY IRFAN SHAHÎD Volume II Part 2: Economic, Social, and Cultural History PUBLISHED BY DUMBARTON OAKS RESEARCH LIBRARY AND COLLECTION Washington, D.C. Copyright © 2009 by Dumbarton Oaks Trustees for Harvard University, Washington, D.C. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. All maps by K. Rasmussen (archeographics.com), © 2009 by Dumbarton Oaks, Trustees for Harvard University Library of Congress cataloging-in-publication data available ISBN 978-0-88402-347-0 IN MEMORIAM P. MICHELE PICCIRILLO 1944–2008 P. FRANCIS DEMARET 1927–2009 Contents Abbreviations x Preface xiii Acknowledgements xxi I Economic History I The Role of the Ghassānids 3 II The Ghassānids and the Security of Oriens 6 III The Ghassānids and International Trade Routes 10 IV The Fairs 33 V The Ghassānids as Tax Collectors 41 VI A Ghassānid Dyarchy in Oriens 43 VII Other Contributions 45 VIII The Wealth of Arabia 47 IX Economic Rivalry in Arabia: Byzantium and Persia 52 Appendix Al-Nuʿmān ibn al-Mundir: Ghassānid or Lakhmid? 57 II Social History A Background I Ghassānid Federate Society 61 II The Women of Ghassān 81
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Provincial Borders Across Jordan1
    ARC Teaching Fellow Kate da Costa Archaeology University of Sydney [email protected] Roman Provincial Borders Across Jordan1 Abstract number a century beforehand (Jones 1964: 42-43 By 400 AD Jordan was divided amongst four Roman and 280-283). An understanding of the position, provinces: Palaestina Prima in the southern Jordan nature and function of the borders between each Valley, Palaestina Secunda over most of north- province is fundamental to any study of the ad- west Jordan, Palaestina Tertia south of the Wådπ ministration of the Empire. Such an understanding al-Møjib and Arabia over the rest. However, as in is hampered by the fact that, nearly one hundred the rest of the Roman Empire, we are uncertain as years after Mommsen published The Provinces of to where some, or all, of the actual border lines ran. the Roman Empire (1909), we still do not know ex- That the border was known in antiquity is clear actly where the internal borders ran. It appears that from the evidence of toponyms, cadestration, tax part of the problem is the attitude that we more or records and pilgrims’ accounts. That the border had less know which territories belong to which prov- some meaning is also clear — on principal borders ince, and that this rough knowledge is sufficient for a customs duty was imposed which distorted the historical studies (Millar 1993: 31 and 535-544). trade in locally produced ceramics. This distortion The result of such an approach can be illustrated by is particularly clear in the southern Levant, and the maps from a study of Roman provincial admin- provides a tool to develop an archaeological istration in the Danubian provinces (Dise 1999), methodology to detect provincial borders in a way although it should be stressed that this is merely a not available to historians.
    [Show full text]
  • Nessana Papyri
    People and Identities in Nessana by Rachel Stroumsa Department of Classics Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Kent Rigsby, Supervisor ___________________________ Lukas Van Rompay ___________________________ Joshua Sosin ___________________________ Clare Woods ___________________________ Grant Parker Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the department of Classics in the Graduate School Of Duke University 2008 ABSTRACT People and Identities in Nessana by Rachel Stroumsa Department of Classics Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Kent Rigsby, Supervisor ___________________________ Lukas Van Rompay ___________________________ Joshua Sosin ___________________________ Clare Woods ___________________________ Grant Parker An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the department of Classics in the Graduate School of Duke University 2008 Copyright by Rachel Stroumsa 2008 Abstract In this dissertation I draw on the Nessana papyri corpus and relevant comparable material (including papyri from Petra and Aphrodito and inscriptions from the region) to argue that ethnic, linguistic and imperial identities were not significant for the self- definition of the residents of Nessana in particular, and Palaestina Tertia in general, in the sixth- to the seventh- centuries AD. In contrast, this dissertation argues
    [Show full text]
  • Base-Metal Coinage Circulation in Byzantine Beirut 491–641 CE Georges Abou Diwan
    Base-Metal Coinage Circulation in Byzantine Beirut 491–641 CE Georges Abou Diwan To cite this version: Georges Abou Diwan. Base-Metal Coinage Circulation in Byzantine Beirut 491–641 CE. American Journal of Numismatics, The American Numismatic Society, 2018, pp.163-218. hal-02913366 HAL Id: hal-02913366 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02913366 Submitted on 13 Aug 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NUMISMATICS 30 Second Series, continuing The American Numismatic Society Museum Notes THE AMERICAN NUMISMATIC SOCIETY NEW YORK 2018 © 2018 The American Numismatic Society ISSN: 1053-8356 ISBN 978-0-89722-354-6 Printed in China Contents Editorial Committee v Editors’ Note vii Lloyd W. H. Taylor. The Earliest Alexander III Tetradrachm Coinage of Babylon: Iconographic Development and Chronology 1 Paul Vădan. The Posthumous Alexander Tetradrachms of Magnesia on the Maeander 45 Oliver D. Hoover. The Personification of Apameia 107 Clive Stannard, Jean-Albert Chevillon, and Alejandro G. Sinner. More Coins of the Pompeian Pseudomint from France 117 Lucia Carbone. The Unpublished Iberian Lead Tokens in the Richard B. Witschonke Collection at the American Numismatic Society 131 Liv Mariah Yarrow.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FOUNDATION of ROMAN CAPITOLIAS a Hypothesis
    ARAM, 23 (2011) 35-62. doi: 10.2143/ARAM.23.0.2959651 THE FOUNDATION OF ROMAN CAPITOLIAS A Hypothesis Mr. JULIAN M.C. BOWSHER1 (Museum of London Archaeology) INTRODUCTION The town of Beit Ras in northern Jordan is the site of the ancient city of Capitolias. The identification and geographical location of Capitolias was deter- mined in the 19th century. According to numismatic data, the city was “founded” in 97/98 AD. However, it remains an enigma since no one appears to have addressed the questions of why and when Capitolias, as a Roman city, came into being. This paper will concentrate on the Roman city of Capitolias, re-examining the known sources as well as analysing the broader geographic, economic, political, military, and religious elements. These factors will be brought together to produce a hypothesis covering the why and when. This introduction will begin with a review of early accounts of the site and the history of its identifica- tion with Capitolias, before examining its foundation. Historiography The first known (western) description of the site of Beit Ras was by Ulrich Jasper Seetzen who was there in the spring of 1806. He noted that “… from some ancient remains of architecture [it] appears to have been once a consider- able town.” but he was unable to identify it.2 J.L. Burckhardt travelled in the area in 1812 and although he did not manage to visit the site, he was told that at Beit er Ras the “ruins were of large extent, that there were no columns standing, but that large ones were lying upon the ground”.
    [Show full text]
  • Strength to Strength
    STRENGTH TO STRENGTH ESSAYS IN APPRECIATION OF SHAYE J. D. COHEN Edited by Michael L. Satlow Brown Judaic Studies Providence, Rhode Island © 2018 Brown University. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by means of any information storage or retrieval system, except as may be expressly permitted by the 1976 Copyright Act or in writing from the publisher. Requests for permission should be addressed in writing to the Rights and Permissions Office, Program in Judaic Studies, Brown University, Box 1826, Providence, RI 02912, USA. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available from the Library of Congress. ISBN 9781946527110 (pbk.) ISBN 9781946527127 (hbk.) ISBN 9781946527134 (ebk.) Printed on acid-free paper. Contents Abbreviations. .ix Shaye J. D. Cohen: An Appreciation Michael L. Satlow . 1 Signs of Poetry Past: Literariness in Pre-Biblical Hebrew Literature Edward L. Greenstein . 5 Prohibited Bodies in Leviticus 18 William K. Gilders . 27 The Territoriality of YHWH in Biblical Texts Saul M. Olyan . 45 Jerusalem in Greek and Latin Literature Isaiah M. Gafni . 53 No Ancient Judaism Daniel Boyarin. 75 Early Jewish Knowledge of Greek Medicine Pieter W. van der Horst. 103 The Problem of the Hyphen and Jewish/Judean Ethnic Identity: The Letter of Aristeas, the Septuagint, and Cultural Interactions Benjamin G. Wright. 115 What Did They See When They Read the Genesis Apocryphon in the First Decade after Its Publication? Moshe J. Bernstein. 137 The Tetragrammaton in the Habakkuk Pesher Timothy H.
    [Show full text]
  • East LA: Center and Periphery in the Study of Late Antiquity and the New
    East LA: Center and Periphery in the Study ofLate Antiquity and the New Irano-Talmudica Shai Secunda Abstract The study ofthe Sasanian Empire has gradually been incorporated into Late Antique Studies. The inclusion of a territory that was originally marginal to this area ofscholarship is by most accounts a positive deve- lopment, though it is one that should be carefully considered. One means ofevaluating the significance ofthis development is by comparing the scholarly expansion ofLate Antique Studies with the field ofRabbinics, in which the position ofthe Babylonian Talmud vis-à-vis its Sasanian context has recently been reassessed. Introduction: Expanding LA, expanding Sasanian Studies This short essay grew out ofa conference session that considered new perspectives on late antique Iran and Iraq.1 My contribution to this topic is entirely theoretical—which is to say I stay my philological hand— as I explore issues ofcenter and periphery relating to geopolitical and religious facts on the ground during Late Antiquity, as well as the disci- plinary terrain governing the study ofSasanian Iran. These thoughts are inspired by recent work that redraws the spatial and chronological limes ofLate Antiquity, thereby bringing other religions and civilizations into the picture, particularly Islam.2 Here, I think through three over- doi: 10.17613/4cwr-d841 Mizan 3 (2018): 41–52 42 Shai Secunda lapping interrelations—namely, Babylonian Jewry and the Sasanians, Babylonian and Palestinian rabbis, and the Sasanian and Roman Empires —and consider lessons learned from evaluating one set of dynamics alongside the others. The effort to include Sasanian Studies within the purview of Late Antiquity can be compared with the expansion of Sasanian Studies to incorporate non-Iranian communities living in the empire, such as Baby- lonian Jewry.
    [Show full text]