HM Land Registry Annual Report and Accounts 2016/17

Starting our transformation

Report presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 101 of the Act 2002. Accounts presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 4(6)(a) of the Government Trading Funds Act 1973 as amended by the Government Trading Act 1990 Schedule 1, paragraph (6A), (b). HM Land Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed Registry on 18 July 2017. Annual Report and Accounts 2016/17

HC84 © Crown copyright 2017

This publication is licensed under the terms of the v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit: nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- governmentlicence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected].

Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned.

This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/ publications.

For enquiries regarding this publication call Customer Support on 0300 006 0411 or email [email protected]; for press enquiries call the Press Office on 0300 006 7543.

Print ISBN 9781474145619

Web ISBN 9781474145626

ID 24051701 07/17

Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum.

Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

Cover: US Embassy building in Nine Elms, London. Registered to the United States of America by HM Land Registry in January 2010. Carl Court/Getty Images

This page: John James/DigitalVision/Getty Images Who we are and what we do 4 Foreword Chair’s statement by Michael Mire 8 Overview Interview with Graham Farrant, Chief Executive 10 and Chief Land Registrar Performance report 16 Our digital transformation 18 Smart working in HM Land Registry 22 Our values in action 26 The law firm inside HM Land Registry 28 Our experts – HM Land Registry’s people 30 Why sustainability matters 34 Performance analysis Director of Finance’s report 36 Our performance 44 Sustainability performance 52 Performance on other matters 58 Other information 59 Accountability report Contents Corporate governance report 63 Remuneration and staff report 78 Parliamentary accountability and audit report 90 Certificate and report of the Comptroller and 92 Auditor General to the Houses of Parliament Financial statements 94 Appendices 121

Who we are and what we do We register ownership, interests, and mortgages The head of HM Land Registry is the Chief Land and other secured loans against land and property in Registrar, appointed under statute by the Secretary England and Wales. of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS, formerly known as BIS – Business, Innovation and Skills) who has Parliamentary responsibility for Our ambition HM Land Registry and for the legislation under which HM Land Registry is committed to becoming the we operate. The Secretary of State’s day-to-day world’s leading land registry for speed, simplicity and lead for HM Land Registry issues on his ministerial an open approach to data, and aiming to achieve team is currently the Parliamentary Under Secretary comprehensive registration by 2030. of State. The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) and the Department of Energy and Our mission Climate Change (DECC) merged in July 2016 to form Your land and property rights: guaranteed and the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial protected. Strategy (BEIS).

Our functions are entirely statutory. We have no Our primary role prerogative powers. The Land Registration Act 2002 Provide a reliable record of information about empowers us to deal with “the business of registration the ownership of and interests affecting land and under this Act” and is our primary governing statute. property. The Infrastructure Act 2015 enabled HM Land Provide land and property owners with a title which is Registry to undertake new services that would further guaranteed by the state. improve the process or benefit the Provide the financial sector with the capability to wider property sector. The first step we are taking is secure lending against property. to create a digitised local land charges register that will improve access to data, standardise fees and Our values underpin everything we do improve turnaround times for property professionals We give and citizens. Our services assurance Register change services – every plot of registered land is given a unique register title with a corresponding title number and plan. Properties are We have sold, homes and office buildings are re-mortgaged, people get married or property is transferred when owners pass away, buildings are split into several flats integrity and new developments completed. Making changes to the register and creating new titles can be complex and highly technical so this is where our expert We drive caseworkers focus their knowledge and experience.

Register query services – we hold one of the largest innovation transactional property databases which we allow anyone to view for a small fee but our guaranteed and official searches provide even greater protection We are and assurance to property professionals and citizens. These services are almost entirely automated so customers can get results instantly, making professional conveyancing quicker.

Other services – our Land Charges service protects Our statutory duties interests in unregistered land and we maintain the HM Land Registry was established in 1862. We are a bankruptcy index for England and Wales. We also non-ministerial government department, an executive offer commercial services to organisations who want agency (since 1990) and a (since 1993) to use our data. For example, lenders can validate that makes no call on funds voted by Parliament. By mortgages by confirming their priority and status on statute we are required to ensure that our income the Land Register. from fees covers all of our expenditure under normal operating conditions.

4 Annual service revenues Who we are and and volumes 2016/17 Applications for services 94.8% what we do 31.8 million received through electronic channels Total income £311.4m REGISTER Register change services

Update Leasehold creation Splitting New title existing title from existing title freehold titles creation £155.5m £30.6m £32.1m £8.3m

LEASEHOLD

Intake volume Intake volume Intake volume Intake volume 5.0m 0.2m 0.2m 0.1m

REGISTER Register query services

Official Views of MapSearch copies of the register (PDF) the register Intake volume £44.0m £19.1m 1.1m Intake volume Intake volume 6.4m 14.6m Official Guaranteed search searches of of the index map the register £1.1m GUARANTEED £2.4m Intake volume Intake volume 0.8m 2.4m

Other services £100

Land Charges Commercial services £6.3m £5.6m

5 Annual service revenues and volumes 2016/17

Daily average workload

All services Register change services Register query services Update existing title 19,515 76,937 New freehold or leasehold Register change services title creation 428 21,558 Leasehold creation from Enquiry services existing title 904 4,265 75+214A 90+24+4A Splitting freehold titles 711

Income Customers who rate our services as good, very good or excellent £100 £311.4m 90.3% Operating costs £241.9m

Retained surplus Registered titles 24.8m £45.7m Dividend £18.9m

Registered land in England and Wales 84.3% 12,745,582 hectares 14 locations

Employees 4,862 Permanent full-time equivalent 4,148 Female 60% Male 40% Part-time £72,500 35% raised by colleagues for charity Apprentices 277 6 Our strategy

Transformation Delivering benefits through strong governance, planning Digital and implementation. Digitising our services and the register, modernising our IT and maximising the Customers re-use of our data. Meeting the changing needs of our customers to make conveyancing simpler, faster and cheaper. Our mission Your land and property rights: guaranteed and protected Our ambition The world’s leading land registry for speed, simplicity and an open approach to data. Estate Right sizing our estate and embedding smart working to create modern efficient People work environments. Empowering our people, developing capability, Financial building capacity and Ensuring value for modernising the money and a robust organisation. financial plan.

£100

7 Foreword

8 Chair’s statement by Michael Mire

Ultimately our goal is for HM Land Registry to be HM Land Registry’s reputation for accuracy, integrity globally viewed as one of the very best. This is why and professionalism, and our dedicated expert we are starting a transformation that will see HM colleagues, are our most cherished assets. We are Land Registry becoming almost fully digitised with a starting our transformation but not forgetting our modernised culture that recognises the contribution of history. It is a huge privilege for me to chair an all our colleagues. organisation so important to the country and to its customers. Digitisation will allow us to provide our customers – citizens, firms, government, lawyers and conveyancers, and financial institutions – with information and data which are renowned for their accuracy and usefulness. HM Land Registry’s strategy is to make its part in developing, buying and selling land and property, and collateralising mortgages and loans to provide finance, almost totally frictionless.

This will not distract us from our central mission. HM Land Registry will always ensure that property rights and financial rights over property are guaranteed and protected. We will continue to provide an unlimited state-backed guarantee for free through our indemnity scheme. Our property price data will continue to be the basis of the country’s most trusted source of valuation insight. But the transformation programme will reinforce our mission by making its delivery more effective, far quicker and much simpler.

Our Annual Report describes how the transformation will unfold. Digital is pivotal but culture is what will make it succeed. Our frontline colleagues are experts. We will help build on their expertise using cutting-edge science, like artificial intelligence, so that our colleagues become the most digitally skilled land registration Our goal is for HM experts in the world. Land Registry to be Our transformation will also enhance HM Land Registry’s role as one of the UK’s most important geospatial agencies. Our land and property intelligence, globally viewed as and therefore the nation’s, will be radically improved. The register will become increasingly digital, 3D, one of the very best. comprehensive and significantly richer in data than the register today. The platform we are building will be essential visiting for everyone interested in land and property intelligence.

9 Overview: Interview with Graham Farrant, Chief Executive and Chief Land Registrar Alberto Manuel Urosa Toledano/Moment/Getty Images Toledano/Moment/Getty Manuel Urosa Alberto

10 A modernised HM Land Registry will aid data sharing across government for the purposes of supporting development, financial stability, tax collection, law enforcement and the protection of national security.

How are you preparing for transformation? To prepare ourselves for transformation we will continue to strengthen our executive and non- executive board member portfolios to ensure we have the right mix of experience in the private and public sectors; combining experience at HM Land Registry with fresh insight and ideas from What will you be focusing on in 2017? outside the organisation. We will also ensure Central to our plans for 2017 will be engaging our our teams are fully resourced and capable of people on our priorities so that they fully understand modernising the organisation and our services. what we are asking of them before starting our transformation. Our long history has always given us a strong sense of purpose but we now have a renewed The Government has set an ambition for HM Land clarity of direction for our future. Registry to become the world’s leading land registry for speed, simplicity and open approach to data and But while we seek to push the boundaries as we aim to achieve comprehensive registration by 2030. innovate in digital and data services we will never lose our focus on our customers or our core statutory priorities. ‘Your land and property rights: guaranteed and protected’ summarises our promise of assurance to the market and our overriding priority is to ensure the integrity of the register as we receive and process many millions of applications each year.

Our values will continue to underpin everything we do and our transformation will reinforce the key elements of assurance provided to land and property owners and the integrity of the register, which will always be paramount to our future success. The graphic shows how the World Bank ranks land registration and we know that becoming How would you describe 2016? a world leader will be challenging. As a year that began with challenges for HM Land This is why our strategy is to become a truly digital Registry but ended with real clarity over our future. service provider with our data made available to the benefit of citizens, customers, entrepreneurs and At the beginning we were seeing ever increasing government partners. Together with comprehensive volumes of work, undergoing a public consultation registration, our strategy will be transformative.

Alongside the key role we already play in the property market our transformation will help us to support the Our new ambition, UK in developing a vibrant and innovative digital economy. Our plans will not only involve the mission and values digitisation of our existing services but we will explore how, through new digital technology, we can help to potentially release even more value from the Land reflect our core Register. commitment to the To do this we will work creatively with key players and innovators across the market to help us create a truly digital register through our “Digital Street” pilot which integrity of the Land we intend to launch in summer 2017. Register. The Government will also examine how we and can work more closely together to provide more effective digital land and property intelligence and strengthen the UK’s leadership in geospatial.

11

operating a pilot version of our digital mortgage digital mortgage our of version a pilot operating feedback. good who gave with borrowers, service to service Verify will be using the Government’s We identity; of security provide ƒ Our refusal to compromise on quality, maintaining maintaining on quality, to compromise refusal Our the of in the face even the register, of the integrity in 2008/09, crash the market since volumes highest complex with more in dealing delays has meant by effort more require that applications types of customers. our input from people and more our 600 on nearly took we meet this challenge To new of intake biggest our colleagues, new flexible more introduced years, people in many our to and made changes working of ways efficiency. increase to systems casework made improvements have we customers our For Application such theas to services our to which launched last March we service Enquiry see the to and conveyancers enables solicitors specific cases online. on their progress case handling reduced we progressed year As the continue will this that clear times and I am crystal are meeting we until year financial the next into routine. of as a matter targets service speed of our by recognised been have those efforts I believe to meet our still able were we as customers our indicator performance key satisfaction customer Our (KPI) such despite a challenging backdrop. KPIs. our of all to achieve is year next for aspiration ƒ What about progress in making in What about progress digital? more the register met our we digital performance our terms of In to available were online services our ensure to KPIs them. access needed to they whenever customers just been about maintaining it hasn’t However the past 12 months Over are. as they services our including: advances, made further have we

Talk us through the performance for the year for the performance through us Talk our six of exceeded or achieved only we As a headline tell but this does not indicators performance eleven the full story. the full story. we downturn, a market of speculation Despite requests in service to see an increase continued operational Our types. most application across and ensured busy incredibly kept were colleagues by to function continued market the property that could and as they as quickly applications processing arose. they prioritising as time-criticalapplications by on a potential privatisation and during the summer and during the summer privatisation on a potential Brexit. over global uncertainty further was there for Statement Autumn decision set out in the The a data- on becoming focus to HM Land Registry was business in the public sector registration driven it quo. Rather, the status of an endorsement not our modernise impetus to and develop us fresh gave to intelligence and location services digital and data and the economy. market support the property in the Housing reinforced then further was This housing market” broken our “Fixing Paper White usto which committed 2017 in February speed, for best land registry world’s the become aiming and to to data, and openness of simplicity 2030. by registration comprehensive achieve in our a milestone marked statements These with an unparalleled us presenting long history, way the and reshape rethink to opportunity the be to aspire do to we what and work we world. in the best land registry very a conduct to the momentum also provided They which has helped business our of review strategic will transform we how of view a clear us develop to for leading land registry world’s the become to data. to and an open approach speed, simplicity

fotoVoyager/E+/Getty Images 12 98% Best in customer service For the last five years we have exceeded our customer satisfaction targets with an average of 95% rating our overall service as good, very good or excellent.

We ensure that our services are delivered to the highest standards of quality with 98% of register updates passing rigorous quality checks.

ƒƒ trialling our Find Property Information service, which 70 in Stonewall’s Top 100 Employers for lesbian, allows members of the public to view a title summary; gay, bisexual and transgender staff and our award for Network Group of the Year in the Employers ƒƒ winning recognition for our common technology Network for Equality & Inclusion Awards 2016. platform through its short-listing for the UK IT Industry Innovation Award. The platform will be a Many of our new recruits have joined their existing launch pad for a range of services that will benefit colleagues to become actively involved in the social, a variety of customers and the UK economy as a sport and charity events that make HM Land Registry whole; and such a special place to work. Our people collected almost £72,500 this year for good causes by holding ƒƒ giving a live demonstration of the first alpha version sponsored and fundraising events large and small. of the new register service to our stakeholders during our Local Land Charges conference in November. Perhaps nothing illustrates their generosity of spirit better than the campaign for colleague Hannah Miller, who suffered a life-changing spinal injury How have your colleagues reacted and needed a major refurbishment of her home. to these challenges? Colleagues across the organisation, many of who had never met Hannah, threw themselves into Reflecting on our people, despite the increased fundraising to collect the necessary money. pressure and uncertainty, we only narrowly missed the ambitious two-year target we set ourselves It is that collective effort which, despite the to increase colleague engagement scores by a significant challenges and uncertainty outside of massive 15%, In fact our year end internal pulse our control, has underpinned a solid performance survey showed we were exceeding this target, from HM Land Registry but also set the achieving the highest engagement scores for the foundations to start our transformation. organisation since recording began in 2009. This huge and sustained effort by a loyal and Do you have a final message? experienced workforce has been given fresh impetus by our new recruits and the apprentices To our people, thank you. You have achieved a we are introducing to the world of work to build tremendous amount against a very challenging the next generation of expert colleagues. backdrop. But I am going to be relying on you all to do even more – 2017 is going to be a year of exciting changes for us but I will need all your What has surprised you about your colleagues? support to turn our ambitions into reality. Our first tranche of 80 apprentices ‘graduated’ To our many stakeholders, I would ask you to join, in the autumn after two years of training support and partner with us as we explore how and the great majority have stayed on through digital technology we can work together with us as registration executives. to make conveyancing quicker, cheaper and simpler for everyone – a digital proposition which actually We have made sustained efforts to widen the expresses the essence of why our system of land pool of potential applicants for our jobs, reflecting registration was created more than 150 years ago. the importance we put on the diversity of our workforce. This was recognised by our placing at

13 14 We’re committed to becoming the world’s best land registry for speed, simplicity and openness of data.

15 Performance report Chris Winsor/Moment Open/Getty Images

1616 HM Land Registry’s pivotal role in the property and financial markets

What our customers ask What’s available How much Is the land Is my customer’s Has my loan been Are my details close to home? can I borrow? registered? offer protected? registered? up to date?

How big is What’s the Who owns Has the seller’s Has the sale of How can I stop the garden? property worth? the property? conveyancer the property been myself being a searched the completed? victim of property register? fraud? How big is the Is there an office car park? outstanding mortgage?

1. Looking for 2. Arranging a 3. Before the 4. Exchange of 5. Completion 6. Living/working a property mortgage exchange contract in the property How HM Land Registry helps at every stage Property search Land charges search Official copy Official search Register new Property Alert of the register property

Flood risk House price index Search of the index Transfer of title Update the register map

Price paid Bankruptcy search Document view Discharge of mortgage

Since 1862 we have provided confidence to to create new products, buyers and lenders to the property market of England and Wales by make more informed decisions and facilitates safeguarding ownership and interests in land and transparency to combat fraud and corruption. property currently worth more than £4 trillion. Not only do we protect ownership through an unlimited state guarantee but we also underpin the financial sector. Registration of mortgages and loans enables financial institutions to provide secure personal and commercial lending against property, which supports economic growth and prosperity. We offer a range Our involvement goes well beyond simply registering the final transaction. We provide much of the of services that help information that influences the decisions of property buyers and sellers and financial institutions. smooth the path We also offer a range of services that help smooth the path towards a deal being completed. These towards a deal range from our official search which protects transactions while the transfer is completed through to our commercial services which help being completed. lenders verify their mortgage portfolio.

Solicitors and conveyancers come to us on behalf of their clients to search our records to find out as much as possible about the property. Our data, available directly from us or via third-party innovators, helps enable proptech entrepreneurs

17 Our digital transformation ilbusca/E+/Getty Images

18 John Abbott Our digital Director of Digital, Data transformation and Technology wider public, it will mean easier access to our services and data, including the 24.8 million property titles in the Land Register. For anyone involved in buying and selling property, it will mean a faster, smoother conveyancing system thanks to the new digital land registration services the platform will provide.

Developing new services Digital transformation is at the heart of the changes In June 2016 we began operating a pilot version of we want to make. By putting the user at the centre of our digital mortgage service. As it does not yet create our approach we will continue to deliver an increasingly a legal deed, borrowers still need to sign a paper deed, broad range of digital services which will make the but the pilot service has allowed us to check that what conveyancing process simpler, faster and cheaper. we have built will work in the real world. The feedback from borrowers who have tested the service has been Our focus for next year (and beyond) will be to positive, and we have made improvements based on digitise the majority of HM Land Registry services. this feedback. We are now using the GOV.UK Verify We have already made significant progress over service to provide us with an appropriate level of ID the last year in preparing for the future and assurance before the borrower digitally signs their introducing new and improved services which will mortgage deed. The service is still make both conveyancers’ and citizens’ lives easier. in private beta but we intend to open it up to more users in 2017. Not only will we be digitising our existing services but we will also be testing the future of digital This will be one of the first of conveyancing through our “Digital Street” pilot a new breed of digital services which will allow us to safely explore the use of which enable customers and new technologies such as Blockchain and Artificial citizens to update the register Intelligence. digitally. The first truly digital mortgage can be created, signed and registered without the need for any paperwork or emailing and without the need for our colleagues to be involved in the process.

We developed our Find Property Information service over 2016/17 so citizen customers can access a title summary which provides information from the full register in a simpler, clearer format. We have MapSearch is the blueprint for how we develop and deploy

Preparing for a digital future new digital services Our common technology platform was short-listed for a UK IT Industry award in 2016. The platform enables in the future. our technology teams to improve our IT infrastructure quickly, easily and reliably as part of a future strategy to replace our current IT systems over the next five years. It will underpin all of our new digital services and makes best use of cloud and open source technologies.

For our customers, government partners and the

19 adopted a user-centred design approach which wealth of information via the Business e-services portal has helped build simplicity into the service from – our online transactional channel for our professional the start. We’ve conducted more than 100 user customers. research sessions taking feedback and improving the service to make it more user-friendly. This new service has now been live for a year and the number of calls and emails we receive has fallen as a result, meaning our caseworkers can focus on offering Enhancing existing services a faster service overall. Our award-winning MapSearch service gives our This year we added a number of new features customers self-service access to an online mapping that customers asked for, such as sending email tool for free, allowing them to quickly establish notifications when a customer’s application results are whether land and property in England or Wales is ready for download. We’ve also added information registered. Through MapSearch customers have about mortgages that have been repaid, and the ability saved themselves well in excess of one million to contact us directly from the service. Customer searches of the index map since the service was feedback is that the service is simple and easy to use. launched, saving themselves time and money. Ensuring our services are meeting our customers’ needs and getting their feedback will be central to the new digital services we will deliver in the future.

HM Land Registry data becomes a national statistic The first UK House Price Index (HPI) was launched on 14 June 2016. Published by HM Land Registry in MapSearch online conjunction with the Office for National Statistics, Registers of and Land & Property Services Since its launch in 2014, the service has gone Northern Ireland, the index replaced the previous from strength to strength, winning the Civil indices separately published by those organisations. Service Digital Award in 2015 and we’ve continued to enhance and improve it. The single UK HPI ends the confusion previously caused by multiple government indices and the new MapSearch passed the milestone of 10 million methodology now includes more information in searches in October 2016. We want the success of calculations such as cash sales new dwellings and MapSearch to be our blueprint for how we develop type of buyer (first-time buyer or existing owner) and deploy new digital services in the future. to provide full coverage of the housing market. Each month users can make use of detailed reports, Our free Application Enquiry service allows customers downloadable data and an interactive search tool. to check the progress of any application and find a

20 Ruth Hornby Photography/Moment Open/Getty Images Hornby Photography/Moment Ruth

This new, combined house price index gives a more accurate picture than ever before. David Brown Chief Executive of estate agency Marsh & Parsons

21 Smart working in HM Land Registry ChrisHepburn/E+/Getty Images

22 John Peaden Smart working in Director of Operations HM Land Registry “professional, innovative, enthusiastic and positive” at their graduation ceremony which marked the completion of our first two-year apprenticeship programme in our , and Telford offices. We now have 261 apprentices in operations and more to come with a rolling annual programme of apprentice recruitment across all of our locations. Many of our first tranches of apprentices have secured permanent jobs at the end of their apprenticeship and are the pool from which the next generation of land As Director of Operations I support more than 3,500 registration experts will be selected and developed. expert caseworkers who process applications and answer enquiries on land registration matters every day. We took a significant step forward in the way we map our casework by developing and introducing ‘geo- On an average day HM Land Registry processes referencing’ software. around 120,000 different transactions covering a range of services and enquiries. Servicing these The software provides a way for scanned or paper is not only critical to our business but more deed plans to be intelligently overlaid onto our importantly they are vital to the smooth functioning digital mapping system so that title boundaries of the property and financial services markets. can then be electronically traced. This has eliminated the need to print off plans and plot Therefore, for us, finding ways to be more efficient not boundaries using traditional mapping methods, only improves our productivity but makes the whole significantly reducing the time taken to complete conveyancing process in England and Wales quicker, the mapping or remapping of a registered title. cheaper and simpler, which was the original intention of creating HM Land Registry all those years ago. Some jobs that could have previously taken many hours of laborious manual plotting can now be done While our digital transformation will be key to this we in less than 30 minutes, such is the power of new also want to ensure that we can maximise the output technology. Twenty caseworkers were involved in the of our expert people and improve the experience for trial phase; they thoroughly tested the software and our customers. identified enhanced features and functionality. All of our caseworkers agreed that the new system was more efficient and much easier to use than the previous Talk us through some of the highlights and process, and are using it to benefit our customers. challenges of the year… Our people submitted more than 1,300 ideas for The biggest challenge was dealing with volumes technical and system improvements through a that continued to rise. We received over a million new staff suggestion scheme, 10% of which have more applications than the year before. Quite often either been implemented, or are in the process. the more straightforward applications are the most time critical which, in the past, meant having to divert expert caseworkers from complex applications to handle more straightforward applications. Servicing The highlights for me were how we responded to those challenges. transactions is Our new starters included a new role created specifically to deal with the more straightforward vital to the smooth applications, allowing our experienced caseworkers to concentrate on the more functioning of the complex work such as registering major new developments or infrastructure projects. property market. Several rounds of recruitment have brought more than 500 new people into operations, from a wide variety of backgrounds. Those that joined on temporary contracts had their term extended as soon as their contribution to speed and efficiency of our casework processes became clear.

Our pioneering apprentices were described as 23 How do you think operations Our next stage of transformation will start by focusing will change in the future? on new services that digitise the greatest volumes of our work so that we can be more resilient to For me one of the central elements of how operations market fluctuations but also enhancing our existing will improve is through digital transformation, which online services to improve the experience for our is why it is a key element of our future direction. customers and create ongoing efficiencies.

Completely new interfaces and channels for both We are testing the concept of routing complex, our online customer services and our case-working commercial and infrastructure work to dedicated teams. systems will replace paper applications, capturing and Other teams are investigating how best to improve validating data directly. Our professional caseworkers the processes associated with applications for new will become experts in digital land registration as build properties submitted by developers. We already the tools and systems they use are transformed by recognise the advantages of early collaboration with technology. The Land Register will be a transparent developers, as the speedy resolution of any site issues source of accessible data with uses that may not can cause delays further down the line. The members yet have been conceived even by proptech firms. of these test teams have a high level of technical knowledge to match the complex nature of the work. Our digital services will be designed and developed by actively involving end users, to ensure that We are also extending these trials by making two take-up of these new services will be driven by of our locations ’Model Offices’. We’ll use these a great customer experience. MapSearch and offices to test, evaluate, and roll out best practices Property Alert, our award-winning digital services, as ‘standard operating procedures’ so that all of HM were delivered with customers at the heart. Land Registry, and ultimately our customers, benefit from efficiency, practice and policy improvements. The Model Offices will be very ‘agile’ in approach; if new ideas fail, they will quickly move on and try something else. Our people have loads of great ideas and by empowering them to identify, test and shape how we process our work we will not only improve our productivity, but also to help promote a culture of positive disruption and innovation.

‘Geo-referencing’ software

Alongside that I see continuous improvement teams and modern ways of working embedded across the operations function of the future. We have already had some successes from continuous improvement practices but I believe we can become more efficient by working even smarter.

What will you be focusing on for 2017? A key commitment in the Housing White Paper is for us to aim to achieve “comprehensive registration” by 2030. Roughly 16% of the land mass of England and Wales remains unregistered, and we have a prioritised programme of work that will seek to reduce this as much as possible, and unify conveyancing processes. The creation of a new registered title is much more complex and time consuming than amending an existing one – we will therefore need to ensure we have experienced and technically-proficient Digital caseworker teams prepared to register new titles as applications come in. Supporting public sector land transformation owners will be our initial focus. Some of that land may include prime building sites for new homes. is a key element of We will also continue to support major infrastructure and development projects by creating bespoke our future direction. and dedicated service teams to work across varied stakeholder groups to support the registration of some of the largest and most complex property projects in the UK.

24 Colindale Gardens is a mixed use development Sherford will be a new town in Devon in the heart of north west London which will which will have 5,500 new homes and over create 2,900 new homes plus cafés, restaurants 80,000 m2 of employment and retail space. and retail facilities including nine acres of It will include four schools and a variety of landscaped garden on the former site of the community facilities such a town hall, youth Metropolitan Police Training School. centre, theatre and a community park. As HM Land Registry is working with the well as registering the residential properties, developers to register all the homes and we will separately register communal commercial properties well in advance facilities, making their ownership clear. of project launch.

Building on relationships developed during We are working closely with a range registration of High Speed 1 and Crossrail of stakeholders on the National Grid’s we are currently working closely with Land sale of the majority stake of its UK Gas Referencers for High Speed 2, helping identify Distribution business. This involves the ownership and property details for the almost transfer of over 10,000 properties and the 200 miles of route, connections and depots. first registration of sites acquired over more It is anticipated a four-year registration than 200 years by the UK gas industry. programme of upwards of 20,000 interests will commence in late autumn 2017. Monty Rakusen/Cultura/Getty Images Monty Rakusen/Cultura/Getty

25 Our values in action

We give We have assurance integrity We guarantee our services We value honesty, trust and provide confidence to and doing the right thing in the property market the right way

“Cyber-attacks are becoming part of our everyday lives We are committed to combating fraud. Our multi and the recent high profile incidents of organisations award-winning Property Alert online service offers a being attacked through out of date computer systems, free and easy way for owners to monitor activity on rendering critical services such as the NHS crippled, their property. Last year we increased the number demonstrates why we have to continually work to of subscribers from around 37,000 to nearly 70,000 keep our systems protected to stay one step ahead of including a spike in January following a high profile increasingly sophisticated hackers and cyber criminals. fraud case involving a mother and daughter who attempted to illegally obtain a £3 million Kensington “HM Land Registry’s technology platforms are subject house. Their efforts to transfer the property were to over 860 changes each month so keeping our thwarted thanks to our counter-fraud measures. systems secure alongside that level of change is no simple task. Over the past year we have further We have encouraged take up of our Property Alert improved our critical security processes and during service by promoting it both to our business customers the weekend of the large scale attacks our own as well as directly to citizens. We have also worked security teams were able to quickly confirm that with the media to raise awareness of the issue of all of our systems had already been inoculated to property fraud and our advice to reduce the risk of prevent them being infected with the worldwide becoming a victim. This has resulted in regional and ransomware programme known as WannaCry. national coverage, including a front page feature in the Financial Times and even a slot on the BBC’s One Show. “In addition we were also able to quickly verify that all our data was successfully backed up and had been tested to confirm it could be recovered so that, even in the worst case, our data wouldn’t be lost.”

Andrew Radmore Head of IS Assurance

26 Our values in action Philip R Jones/Moment/Getty Images Philip R

We drive We are innovation professional We are forward thinking, We value and grow embrace change and are our knowledge and continually improving our professional expertise processes Our drive to aim to achieve comprehensive land registration by 2030 will draw on all our experience in “It was very clear that our digital mortgage trial the complex task of registering land and property for participants were leading very busy lives and most the first time. Nothing better illustrates the tenacity people much preferred the speed and convenience of and resourcefulness of our first registration experts doing things online, as opposed to paper. than the inland waterways project, which was finally “People described the various challenges that they’d completed after 11 years of meticulous casework. had in their paper mortgage process. One man told Our team at our Birkenhead Office registered almost me how his mortgage documents got lost in the post 2,000 miles of canals, tow-paths, wharves, weirs, twice, while another told me of the issues he’d had in locks and lock houses, docks, dams and reservoirs, finding a witness for his signature. Both of these issues mills and boatyards, underground tunnels and feeders are things that wouldn’t happen with our new digital for the British Waterways Board initially and then its service.” successor the Canal & River Trust. Each application was based on deeds, documents and statutory declarations Shaun Ewings representing a pictorial potted history of 100 years- plus of transactions for that particular stretch of canal. Product Manager, Digital Mortgage This demonstrates our unique geospatial capability.

27 The law firm inside HM Land Registry

28 Alasdair Lewis The law firm inside Director of Legal Services HM Land Registry

Land registration law is highly complex and technical, argue sizable reductions in the amounts originally routinely throwing up difficult and sometimes novel claimed. In total they saved more than £11.3m. legal issues. In many ways our legal function is like a specialised law firm inside HM Land Registry providing Many of our largest indemnity claims result from caseworkers with access to a unique pool of land the registration of fraudulent applications and registration and land law expertise and advice. fraud continues to be one of our biggest risks.

We have a sizeable in-house legal team that During the last year alone our counter-fraud measures employs more than 100 lawyers spread across stopped 50 fraudulent applications from being our offices, all experts in property and registration registered. However we can never be complacent law, who supplement the skills of our experienced as the fraud risk continually evolves and so does caseworkers and provide legal advice whenever our ongoing Counter-Fraud Strategy. Of course we it is needed. Five new lawyers started with HM continue to develop the capabilities of our systems Land Registry during the course of last year and our experts who can detect and eliminate fraud and a further nine joined us in April 2017. before it can even happen. The wording of one of our core values describes it best: We give assurance! During the last year, our lawyers dealt with nearly 100,000 legal queries raised by our Alongside the delivery of HM Land Registry’s caseworkers, a 13% increase on the year before core business and protecting the integrity of the register our lawyers have also been The “state guarantee” provided by the Land actively involved in the evolution and reform Registration Act 2002 ensures that anyone who of land registration law for the future. suffers loss as a result of a mistake in the register will be compensated by HM Land Registry. In February we consulted on proposed changes to the Land Registration Rules 2003 to allow us to Every indemnity claim is carefully considered. Last introduce digital transactions that are electronically year our lawyers rejected more than 400 claims signed, a critical legal step to enable our digital because they were found to be spurious or ill- transformation plans to become a reality. founded. In other cases our lawyers were able to

FINANCIAL TIMES

HOME WORLD UK COMPANIES MARKETS OPINION WORK & CAREERS LIFE & ARTS

UK Property Help! My house has been hijacked Fraud continues Fake tenants adopt a property owner’s identy and sell the property to be one of our Alasdair Lewis, director of legal services at the Land Registry, says: “Property is a high-value biggest risks. asset and therefore an attractive target for fraudsters. Your property, even your family home, can be sold and mortgaged to raise money without you even knowing. Fixing the mess can be distressing, time-consuming and costly.”

29 Our experts – HM Land Registry’s people

30 Caroline Anderson Director of Human Resources Our experts – and Organisation & Employee HM Land Development Engagement index score Leadership and managing change

59 56 53 48 48 49 44 45 Registry’s 41 38 33 26 27 22 19 19 19 people 15 Oct 09 Oct 10 Oct 11 Oct 12 Oct 13 Oct 14 Oct 15 Oct 16 Feb 17

44+41+45+48+48+49+53+56+59communications19+15+19+26+22+19+27+33+38 with weekly blogs and bulletins As our Chair says in his statement, our people have always been one of HM Land Registry’s which allow colleagues to post comments and debate most valuable assets. Land registration work is issues directly with the Chief Executive and his fellow varied and complex requiring experience, training, board members, creating a forum for digital dialogue technical knowledge and judgement. Its delivery with readership and engagement levels well above is supported by high level professional expertise industry benchmarks. Our new intranet, as shown across all parts of the organisation to ensure we below, which launched at the end of the year gives meet our statutory duties and help our customers us the platform to take this approach even further. as effectively and efficiently as possible.

HM Land Registry has a longstanding and loyal workforce whose passion and pride in their work is key to our ability to deliver, something we both value and rely on and is reflected in our values. We have much to be proud of, with a history and heritage which is reflected in our people, who not only value our customers but are committed to giving an excellent service, as evidenced by our customer satisfaction scores. Protecting that commitment is key to the success of our organisation.

However the delivery of our transformation programme will need not only inspiring leadership but also a well-managed and engaged workforce. Engagement champions in every office promote these In addition it will also require investment to build opportunities and keep senior staff in touch with capacity and capability and the modernisation of the colleague opinion. The group developed the corporate organisation to ensure we have right structures and engagement action plan presenting it for Executive capabilities to deliver, supported by modern work Board sign-off, ensuring it was focused on the policies and practice and a culture that promotes things that really matter. This has contributed to our excellence, drives high performance and rewards engagement score increasing to 59% in our February achievement. This process has commenced with a internal survey, the highest in the organisation’s history. review of directorate portfolios, recruitment at all levels and across all functions and investment in Approval in the leadership and managing change skills and training. We are now well positioned to category increased to 38% from a starting take forward this exciting programme of work. position of 19% in 2014 which would have beaten our target for the year and was another record high for the organisation. However, our Empowering our people scores still have room for improvement as survey After the upheaval of the past 10 years, colleague results shown on page 32 demonstrate. engagement has been a challenge for HM Land Our People Strategy will therefore be refreshed to align Registry. There has been significant investment it with our new ambition and sets out our plans to over the last year in communication, engagement modernise our organisation with a programme of work and providing an employee voice. Colleague which will build capacity, develop capability, modernise engagement is now steadily improving and at a and reshape our organisation and empower our people. rate faster than any other part of government.

A programme of monthly Chief Executive and director visits as well as non-executive visits is supported by regular and open interactive digital

31 We place a strong emphasis on developing the skills Land Registry of our people. During 2016/17 an average of 5.9

60 internal training days was provided to all employees, including technical/casework-based and Information Systems training as well as in soft skill and personal development including over 2,600 days of leadership and management training. Investment in the training 50 of newly appointed line managers, accounted for 100 training days in the last quarter of the year. Land Registry In addition £564k was spent on external training Civil Service upskilling across a range of work areas and disciplines. High performers 40 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Our ambition is to create the most digitally proficient workforce of any land registry in the world and Civil Service People Survey – Engagement scores become a beacon for digital skills in the UK. Building capacity and capability Reshaping and modernising the organisation We have already started to build capacity through recruitment and the establishment of a new We have continued to expand our apprenticeship senior leadership structure. We recruited 587 new programme in our Operations Directorate and delivered colleagues in 2016/17, a net gain of 276 people with new apprenticeships in Information Systems, Human applicants from across a range of backgrounds. Resources and Finance. Since 2014 we have recruited 388 apprentices from a diverse range of backgrounds. Our recruitment has been focused on: Almost 70% of the first cohort who completed their ƒ addressing front-line needs to meet and maintain apprenticeship last year were offered permanent service delivery standards and to address future workforce sustainability;

ƒ enhancing specific capability areas, particularly in commercial, digital transformation and agile development skills; and

ƒ delivering key programmes of work including new digital services and the Local Land Charges Programme.

32 “In 2016 HM Land Registry celebrated an important milestone as our first trainee solicitor, Carol Gurajena, was enrolled as a solicitor at the Law Society.

“This process began in 2013 when HM Land Registry was accredited by the Solicitors Regulation Authority as a recognised provider for trainee solicitors. Carol, who worked in Registration and Legal Services Group, one of our head office legal teams, became our first trainee. This followed our successful challenge, on equality grounds, to gain recognition of her qualifications which were stated to be time expired. This challenge opens the door to others in a similar position to Carol across England and Wales, particularly parents who have spent time out of work bringing up children.

“The training gave Carol the opportunity to work within other HM Land Registry groups, including Indemnity and Litigation Group and Corporate Legal and Assurance Services as well as an external secondment to the Government Legal Department. Carol says the placements have enabled her to take a more holistic approach to her work with a good understanding of the common challenges facing government departments.

“This level of training represents a sizeable investment in one person; however we are already seeing the benefits. Carol has joined our team of qualified lawyers and is putting into practice the expertise she gained in training. We intend to extend this successful pilot by providing the opportunity for two further trainee solicitors in 2017/18.”

Mike Westcott Rudd, Board Legal Adviser

Carol Gurajena

roles in HM Land Registry. We also hosted graduate placements from the Civil Service Fast-stream programme in Finance and Commercial Services and Cyber Security plus we have recently launched a pilot trailblazer apprenticeship for paralegals developed with the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) which establishes a career path from the core Operations function to our legal profession.

A better place to work We are passionate about providing and promoting an inclusive culture and were immensely proud to be placed among Stonewall’s Top 100 Employers for the second successive year. Our LGBT & Allies Network was also recognised as the Employee Network Group of the Year in the Employers Network for Equality & Inclusion Awards 2016.

We are committed to maintaining and promoting the health and wellbeing of our people. Through the sponsorship of LR Leisure and with a range of health and wellbeing, leisure and charity committees in each office, colleagues are involved in a wide range of activities, which promote not only health and wellbeing but also colleague engagement, social interaction and corporate social responsibility as well as being fun!

This year the Executive Board agreed an attendance, health and wellbeing framework and associated delivery plan. The framework provides an integrated approach to health and wellbeing with a focus on culture, prevention, intervention, and post absence return to work, recognising priority areas of mental wellbeing, musculoskeletal issues, and general wellbeing.

33 Why sustainability

matters 4kodiak/E+/Getty Images

With more than 150 years of history and a An innovative approach from Fylde Office saw core purpose that is intrinsically linked to the the introduction of a milk club. Purchasing milk in land in England and Wales we care about cartons from a local farm has resulted in the near the environment and our communities. elimination of plastic milk bottles from the office.

We are committed to performing as a responsible business, contributing to wider community activities “I have worked on a number of energy saving and delivering our environmental targets. initiatives during my seven years at Severn Wye and never have I had a project with such Beating our environmental targets a committed, organised and game-on group of We are exceeding and well on course to people than I have with HM Land Registry.” meet all of the Greening Government Commitments (GGC) draft targets for 2020: Severn Wye Agency on the ƒ Paper consumption – 56% reduction* save@work campaign ƒ Carbon – 49% reduction*

ƒ Waste generated – 47% reduction* ƒ Water consumption – 39% reduction* Be like Stephanie: *against 2009/10 baseline switch off your PC and monitor when you don’t use it! save@work Join her Caroline and Andrea prefer the Twelve of our fourteen offices took part in the and save stairs instead of the lift. Be like them, European save@work initiative with SevernWye energy at when possible. Energy Agency. Behavioural change was at the work! Join them heart of the programme and all our offices, even and save the two offices not participating in the actual energy at work! competition, set up a team of people to take develop an action plan and set about implementing it. Stephanie Hill Web content editor, Caroline Savage The overall result was a reduction in gas and electricity Trafalgar House and Andrea Stancliffe Registration Executives, consumption of 5% and 2% respectively for the www.saveatwork.org.uk Trafalgar House

12 offices in the competition. Telford, Weymouth http://workspaces/TrafalgarSustainability www.saveatwork.org. and Birkenhead offices excelled by achieving http://workspaces/TrafalgarSustainabilityuk a reduction in gas and electricity consumption of 18.3%, 15.3% and 7.1% respectively.

34 Freeing up land for redevelopment Charitable fundraising plays a key role in our commitment as a socially responsible business. We have been disposing of parts of our estate to make way for new houses and even schools Local office charity committees have undertaken Why sustainability to better support the local community. a variety of events including sponsored head shaves, cake sales, cycle rides and quizzes which ƒ The northern part of our former Chalfont Drive have collectively raised almost £72,500. Along site in Nottingham was sold to developer Bellway with local causes, our offices also supported Homes and many new homes have already national charities, raising more than £4,400 for matters been constructed. The southern part of the site World Cancer Day, and sponsoring guide dogs. is expected to be transferred to the Homes & Communities Agency imminently, also for the Birkenhead Office held a special collection to development of new homes. help some local children to remain in their family home following the death of both of their parents ƒ Our former childcare nursery site at Leicester is also from cancer within two weeks of each other. to be transferred to the Homes & Communities Agency.

ƒ Our surplus property Old Market House in Birkenhead has been marketed for sale and is now under offer and due to be sold for alternative use.

ƒ We relocated our Office allowing a new school to use the vacated site with previous HM Land Registry facilities already benefiting the local community. Surplus furniture was donated to the school and charities.

Volunteering and charity in the community Over the last year a total of 775 days was spent volunteering by 293 colleagues which included a scheme supporting homeless people, sports coaching and environmental initiatives.

Toni Cray of our Office won our Lucy Mason Award for volunteering. By supporting victims of crime Toni has turned her own experience of a serious crime which deeply affected her family into something positive to benefit others. She also helps with training police liaison officers by sharing her own experience and providing insight into the feelings of someone who has had the support of a liaison officer. Toni also facilitates meetings between victims and the perpetrators to enable the victims to overcome the impact crime has had upon them.

35 Performance analysis: Director of Finance’s report ChrisHepburn/Vetta/Getty Images

36 Catherine Vaughan Performance Director of Finance analysis: Director of Finance’s

Our Finance function has continued to improve report the quality of information and analysis provided to support effective decision making.

During 2016/17 we also developed our Medium Term Financial Strategy, underpinned by a new financial modelling tool to support long-term planning.

We invested heavily in our finance business partnering function, and reviewed our forecasting skills.

An independent assessment of our financial management capability conducted by CIPFA (Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy) endorsed the significant progress made. Our plans for 2017/18 include the replacement of our legacy Finance and HR systems and to improve the financial and commercial skills of key colleagues across the organisation.

Financial summary

2016/17 2015/16 Variance £m £m %

Income 311.4 295.4 5

Operating costs 241.9 254.2 -5

Surplus before dividend 64.6 34.6 87

Capital expenditure 10.6 5.6 91

Net assets 422.2 373.6 13

Cash 489.9 443.9 10

Retained surplus 45.7 21.1 117

Dividend 18.9 13.6 39

Return on capital employed (%) 15.1 8.6 76

37 Revenue We have significant ongoing investment planned and financed within our Medium Term Financial Changes in the property market, including the Strategy including a new, simplified fee order during volume, type and value of the work received, have a 2018 to support this digital transformation and strong direct impact on HM Land Registry’s financial to invest in our underlying IT infrastructure. position. The incoming workload generates revenue and drives the cost of processing applications. This includes replacing our legacy Finance and Human Resources systems with an integrated Enterprise Total revenue, which is comprised of statutory and Resource Planning system during 2017/8. non-statutory revenue, was £311.4m. This represents a 5% increase compared with 2015/16 and was We hold strong cash-backed reserves to generated from a combination of increased volumes mitigate against the risk of an unexpected of registration service applications leading to higher downturn in the economy. We also set aside revenue and deferred income adjustments. in-year revenue and cost risk provisions. A number of datasets were made available for free or as a paid for service to meet demand for Operating costs property-related information and support economic growth. We plan to expand that offer further, with We reduced our operating costs in 2016/17 an open approach to data to support our ambition. despite a higher workload than the previous year, driving efficiency particularly through effective We deferred £8.2m income in 2015/16 as a procurement, rolling out new technology to support result of backlogs rising. There was no significant smarter working and better use of our buildings. movement in backlog levels over the course of 2016/17 which has meant that we have recognised Operating costs were £241.9m (2015/16: £254.2m), the majority of our revenue received in year. a reduction of 5%. Of this reduction, £10.9m relates to movement in the indemnity provision: in 2016/17, the indemnity provision increased by only £0.3m Transformation compared to an increase in 2015/16 of £11.2m. The revenue from statutory services needs Impairment and depreciation costs also reduced to be sufficient to sustain our investment in from £11.7m in 2015/16 to £3.8m in 2016/17, transformation as well as delivering our day-to- a movement of £7.9m. Salary costs increased by day operations and managing the risk associated £11.3m from £168.1m in 2015/16 to £179.4m with unpredictable volumes of work. Therefore in 2016/17 reflecting our increased workload. we continue to review our forecasting expertise and confidence levels in a range of potential As we look ahead to the coming year we will outcomes as we scenario plan for the future. renew our focus on the use of continuous improvement techniques across our offices. We The ongoing digitisation of services will further will generate efficiencies both internally and also increase the organisation’s resilience to market for our customers by making processes more fluctuations and support the mitigation of fraud risk. automated and, where appropriate, standardised.

38 tbradford/E+/Getty Images tbradford/E+/Getty

Capital structure This year the value of the outstanding claims provision decreased to £8.0m (2015/16:£10.5m). The impact The amount of Public Dividend Capital remains of this decrease provision was a reduction of £2.5m unchanged at £61.5m. A dividend payment of to our operating costs (2015/16: £2.1m charge). £18.9m will be made to HM Treasury which Further information, including sensitivity analyses, results in a retained surplus of £45.7m. can be found in note 16.2 in the accounts. We continue to plan for major investment in our The value of the Indemnity Fund Incurred But Not Local Land Charges programme, forward funded Reported (IBNR) provision has increased to £77.1m through our accumulated reserves, which is estimated (2015/16: £74.3m). The impact of this increased to drive at least £88m of benefit to the national provision was a charge of £2.8m to our operating economy by 2026/27 and £183m by 2035/36. costs (2015/16: £9.1m). Further information, including The programme will transition the services from the sensitivity analyses that reflect the estimated nature of relevant 326 English local authorities to HM Land the IBNR liability and susceptibility of the provision to Registry. It will deliver a new national digital service fluctuation, can be found in note 16.2 in the accounts. with 100% of the searches from a spatially enabled Indemnity claims paid £’000 digital register. It will reduce turnaround times from Total for 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 five years an average of eight days to instant online access and will reduce the costs of providing the service. 11,896 11,205 8,383 8,021 6,958 46,462

Indemnity Fund payments The state-backed guarantee of title underpins the Treasury Management conveyancing system. It enables financial institutions Management of liquid assets is governed by the Land to provide secure personal and commercial lending Registry Trading Fund Order 1993, the Additional against property, which supports economic growth. Assets Order 1996, the Extension and Amendment Order 2003 and the Framework Document 2012. We therefore carefully control the risk of error or fraud Non-operating cash balances are maintained in in the register in order to effectively manage the liability interest bearing accounts at the Government associated with indemnity claims. A comprehensive Banking Service and the National Loans Fund with review of current and potential indemnity liability the balance held with a UK commercial bank. is undertaken annually and an appropriate financial provision made within the budget and accounts. Non-current assets In 2016/17 we paid £6.9m for 995 claims, compared with £8m for 1,003 claims in The value of our estate is now £58.1m including assets 2015/16. The largest claim paid this year was held for sale of £6.9m. We have continued to reduce for a forged charge, settled for £702,290 (see the size of our estate and tenants now occupy 24% of it. note 16.2 in the accounts and Appendix E). We have three properties meeting the definition of investment property (the second floor

39 of Weymouth Office, Old Market House in Key relationships Birkenhead and the Earle House extension in We maintain close relationships with our key Hull, which are let on a commercial basis). suppliers through our procurement and contract Our total spend on property (including rent, business management processes. The performance of rates and service charges) and facilities management these suppliers is closely monitored to ensure the (including utilities, post and reprographics) was £20.2m. contracted service is being delivered effectively, Our expenditure on contracted-out services with improvement opportunities are sought and we facilities management provider Carillion was £9m. continue to receive good value for money.

We are working in collaboration with the During the year certain business critical services Government Property Unit in the migrated to new suppliers following competitive to align our estate strategy with government re-procurements; these included our document strategy including the strategic and mini hubs scanning service and wide area network provision. and One Public Estate programmes. While some difficulties occurred with the transition of the document scanning service, these were The northern part of our former Chalfont Drive site dealt with by a combined team from our operations in Nottingham was sold to developer Bellway Homes and commercial groups who worked with the and many new homes have already been constructed. supplier to overcome the initial problems. The southern part of the site is expected to be transferred to the Homes & Communities Agency Other significant contracts awarded through the year imminently, also for the development of new homes. include a replacement Enterprise Resource Planning Our former childcare nursery site at Leicester is also system for Finance and Human Resources, a planning and delivery partner for the Local Land Charges programme and external capacity and capability to support the building of the Local Land Charges register.

Our key suppliers for the year included TNT, Carillion, Xerox, IBM, Cap Gemini, PA Consulting and Kainos.

Significant use continues to be made of cross- government contracts in line with the Cabinet Office’s procurement policy. Where these are not considered to be suitable, opportunities are advertised through OJEU (Official Journal of the European Union).

Nottingham development plans HM Revenue & Customs to be transferred to the Homes & Communities Following a tax compliance audit by HM Revenue Agency. Our surplus property Old Market House in & Customs (HMRC), a provision of £1.2m was Birkenhead has been marketed for sale and is now provided in 2015/16. During 2016/17 £0.5m was under offer and due to be sold for alternative use. paid to HMRC in full settlement of outstanding Total capital spend, primarily on IT, software and tax and £0.7m was written back to expenditure. capitalisation of Local Land Charges development costs, was £10.6m (£2.6m tangible and £8m intangible). Payments We comply with the Late Payment of Commercial Performance against targets Debt (Interest) Act 1998 and the Better Payment Performance is as reported on page 44. Practice Code. During the year we paid 92.1% of undisputed invoices received from suppliers within five working days (2015/16: 92.5%). Future activities Our strategy is as reported on page 7. Auditors The accounts have been audited by the Comptroller Main trends affecting future activities and Auditor General (C&AG). The cost in respect of services relating to the statutory audit for The main trend affecting future activities is the 2016/17 was £65,000 (2015/16: £65,000). level and nature of housing market activity. This is reviewed constantly using a range of indicators from internal and external sources but is inherently unpredictable. Our planning for 2017/18 has been undertaken on the basis that activity will be broadly similar to the pattern seen in 2016/17 with 31 million applications (output) including 0.5m bulk registrations.

Directorships and significant interests Directorships and significant interests are covered in the corporate governance report on page 63.

40 Future expenditure trends The chart below shows the indicative surpluses and deficits in our core planning scenario in our Medium Term Financial Strategy after returning a dividend to HM Treasury of 3.5% of the average capital employed during the year plus inflation. It shows a modest overall surplus over the planning period consistent with the expectations of a Trading Fund and the requirements of Managing Public Money. It excludes the investment in Local Land Charges (LLC) which is being forward funded from accumulated reserves.

Revenue is assumed to grow only at a modest rate Retained earnings for the year (excluding LLC)

15 8.4 10 6.1 3.5 5 1.8 £m 0

5 -1.5

10 -6.1

15 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Total

over the five-year planning period although there are a wide range of potential scenarios that have been tested. The five-year cost profile reflects the current plans and assumptions, which are better understood in the first three years of the plan than in the latter two. This will involve the Finance function undertaking a regular annual review, adapting to new information, learning from experience and responding to emerging Government policy.

The investment in our digital transformation is reflected in both revenue and capital expenditure. Core business costs are expected to reduce as the benefits of the digital programme are realised, though these are offset in the short term by one-off costs and the amortisation of the capital investment.

Catherine Vaughan Director of Finance 11 July 2017

The level and nature of housing market activity is reviewed constantly using a range of indicators.

41

Our new ambition, mission and values reflect our core commitment to the integrity of the Land Register.

43 Our performance Howard Pugh (Marais)/Moment/Getty Images

44 In 2016/17 we set ourselves 11 performance targets. Introduction Seven of these were key performance indicators (KPI), which, in addition to being approved by the Our performance Board to HM Land Registry were also endorsed by the then Minister of State (Minister for Small Business, Industry and Enterprise) for the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.

The remaining four targets were classified as internal performance indicators (PI), which supplemented the KPIs and help to manage the organisation.

Customers

Indicator KPI PI 2015/16 2016/17 Achievement Achievement

The percentage of customers who rate our overall service  94% 90.3% as good, very good or excellent to achieve 90%

By the end of March 2017, to have reduced the backlog, 11.8 days’ worth including cases in standover, to seven days’ worth of intake

By March 2017 we will be completing 70% of 79% dealing applications within five days 

By March 2017 we will be completing 60% of new titles 23% within 25 days

Quality

Indicator KPI PI 2015/16 2016/17 Achievement Achievement

Substantive registrations to pass at least  98.06% 98.3% 98% of defined quality checks

Achieve 98% of speed of service standards relating Accuracy 98.4% to Independent Complaints Reviewer reports and recommendations, and meet complaint accuracy standards  in 98% of cases Apology letter missed on five reports

Efficiency

Indicator KPI PI 2015/16 2016/17 Achievement Achievement

Unit cost to be no more than £20.42  £19.49 £19.34

Achieve at least 12.3 (12.15 restated) units 11.62 (11.48  12.09 processed per full-time equivalent per day restated)

A 5% reduction in running costs compared  Met with the budget for 2014/15

45 Innovation

Indicator KPI PI 2015/16 2016/17 Achievement Achievement

We will develop and release a LLC alpha product, for use by a   subset of the selected pilot local authorities, by 31 March 2017

Average external e-services availability at 99.6%  99.96% 99.89% or higher during published service hours

We will establish two public beta services operating  Not achieved on the GOV.UK website by the end of March 2016

We will release a further four datasets by 31 March 2016 including price paid information  Not achieved on commercially owned properties

Colleagues

Indicator KPI PI 2015/16 2016/17 Achievement Achievement

Achieve an overall colleague engagement score of  56%* no less than 57%

Achieve an improvement in the engagement score for leadership and managing change over two years  Two-year target 14%* of 15% compared with 2014/15 baseline

Attraction and appointment rates for candidates applying Attraction rate for roles within HM Land Registry to be representative 1.8% of the minority ethnic profile of the local labour  population where the recruitment takes place Appointment rate -7.6%

Maintain a consistent index score calculated from a basket of four measures designed to measure  Met motivation and performance of our workforce

Capability Milestone 1 – In 2015/16 to achieve an overall increase in the engagement score of 2%, with a 4% 3% improvement in leadership and managing change in the Civil 6% Service Survey and a 4% improvement in response to senior 12% managers taking action on results from the survey

Capability Milestone 2 – At 31 March 2016 75% or more of 93% the apprentice intake are still on the scheme

Capability Milestone 3 – By the end of March 2016 we will have refreshed the workforce through a new starter rate 7.4% of 4%

Note: Figures for 2015/16 are taken from the Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 in which more detail is provided. * The formal KPIs were missed but the targets were exceeded in the February internal pulse survey.

46 Customers PI – By the end of March 2017, to have reduced the backlog, including cases awaiting a reply from customers, to seven days’ worth of intake KPI – The percentage of customers who rate our overall service as good, very The speed of service we provide to our customers is a good or excellent to achieve 90% product of the volume of work we receive, the level of operational resource available and the efficiency with As trading fund that derives its income from fees which we process that work. The combination of these we have a responsibility to provide a service that three factors results in a backlog of work at any given represents value for money and meets the needs of time, which at the start of the year stood at around 13 our customers and their professional expectations. days’ worth of intake in total numbers of applications. To measure satisfaction we commissioned While this measure is a useful internal metric it is IPSOS to undertake four quarterly surveys of less understandable to our customers as a measure 300 representative customers on our behalf to of the service they receive. Our plans to reduce independently measure satisfaction, the average the backlog of work were therefore underpinned of which is used to calculate the final result. by rigorous service standards, which were:

ƒƒ by March 2017 we will be completing 70% of Result for 2016/17 – 90.3% applications relating to existing titles within five days; and

ƒƒ by March 2017 we will be completing 60% of new titles within 25 days.

Result for 2016/17 By the end of the year we:

97% 98% 98% 94% 94% ƒƒ had reduced the backlog to 11.8 days’ worth of intake; 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 ƒƒ were completing 79.4% of dealings within five days; and Looking ahead ƒ Our performance on our main customer KPI was ƒ were completing 23% of new title applications lower than in previous years. We will be developing within 25 days. and starting to implement a new customer strategy in This is a mixed result for us. Straightforward 2017/18 to provide greater consistency of service and transactions (updates to an existing title) represent by improve our customers’ experience when contacting us far the greatest volume of our work and exceeding our to keep pace with increasing customer expectations. target meant that the majority of applications received a very good service. However, due to the increased intake volumes, we were unable to meet our speed of service targets for the more complex applications to create new titles, which take more resource and are handled by our more experienced caseworkers.

This target was a stretch target for HM Land Registry and was the first time that we have expressed our ambition for our speed of service in this way. Our first year driving towards this target has given us significant learning which will enable us to drive closer to our ultimate service targets over the next year, and then give us an opportunity to improve these targets even further in future years.

Looking ahead We are raising the standard through an ambition to complete all existing title applications within five days and all new title applications within 25 days where it is possible to do so. We believe this is a more meaningful measure to our customers and aligns with feedback received through our customer satisfaction surveys.

47 Quality PI – Achieve 98% of speed of service standards relating to Independent Complaints Reviewer KPI – Substantive registrations to pass at reports and recommendations, and meet least 98% of defined quality checks complaint accuracy standards in 98% of cases The integrity of the register is paramount. As the We strive to resolve all customer complaints as quickly definitive record of property ownership in England and and efficiently as we can and have clear guidance Wales ensuring the register is accurate and of the right and escalation procedures for our people to follow. quality is vitally important. However, customers do have the opportunity to refer complaints to our Independent Complaints Reviewer To measure the quality of our registration work, our (ICR) and a small number of these referrals occur every Register Integrity and Assurance Group take a monthly year. 5% representative sample from the work we have completed and undertake a number of quality checks To make sure any systemic issues are identified and to make sure the registration has been completed dealt with we introduced this target for the first time. accurately. The speed of service element of the target is measured through: Result for 2016/17 ƒƒ provision of apologies and any other specific redress to customers recommended by the ICR within two We achieved 98.3%, the best for three years. weeks of receipt of the ICR’s final report;

ƒƒ agree action plans for the implementation of systemic recommendations by the ICR within four weeks of the date of the next ICREST (Independent Complaints Reviewer Evaluation and Study Team) meeting following receipt of the ICR’s final report; and 98.8% 98.4% 98.4% 98.2% 98.06% ƒƒ complete agreed actions arising from systemic recommendations within 10 weeks or, if the action 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 or change needed cannot be delivered within that timeframe, to agree and schedule the date it can be Looking ahead delivered within that same period. As we digitise and automate more of our services we will build in additional validation checks that will mitigate the opportunities for Result for 2016/17 errors to be made and further enhance the We achieved the accuracy standards in 98.3% of cases, integrity and accuracy of the register. exceeding the target. All of the action plans were agreed within four weeks and the resulting actions completed within ten weeks. However, there were five occasions where the initial letter was not issued within two weeks, missing this deadline by a day or two.

Looking ahead We have already strengthened the initial stages of the process will continue to monitor this target internally and implement any systemic recommendations identified and agreed with the ICR.

48 Efficiency KPI – Achieve at least 12.3 units processed per full-time equivalent per day KPI – Unit cost to be no more than £20.42 As mentioned above, we allocate a notional unit value to each type of application we process based We receive over 30 million applications a year on the relative complexity and effort involved to that vary hugely in nature and complexity, ranging complete the work. Alongside the cost per unit score from a simple request for a copy of a document this allows us to measure the productivity per each we hold to an intricate registration where we full-time equivalent (FTE). We do this by dividing the determine legal ownership based on complex number of units of work produced by the number documentary evidence, often dating back decades. of FTEs used to process the work, giving a figure To help with our budgeting and workforce planning, that represents the productivity of the workforce. we allocate a notional unit value to each type Aligned to change in the calculation of the cost per of application we process based on the relative unit KPI referred to above, early in the year it was complexity and effort involved in the work needed to identified that the additional costs included had the complete the application. A unit cost is then derived effect of adding additional FTEs to the target – making that we use to help measure and drive our efficiency. it more difficult to achieve than intended. To provide a direct comparison, from that point we tracked Result for 2016/17 12.15 units as a target in addition to 12.3 units. We achieved a unit cost of £19.34, beating our target by 6%. Efficiencies in unit cost were primarily driven Result for 2016/17 through IT and procurement savings, enhancements We achieved 11.62 and 11.46 units per FTE per day to case-working systems and the recruitment of against the 12.3 and 12.15 targets respectively. We entry level grades to tackle the more straightforward fell short of this target due to recruiting in significant work (once trained) enabling our more experience numbers and then taking too long for new staff to caseworkers to deal with more complex applications. become fully productive with additional training taking The following chart shows performance for the past experienced caseworkers away from registration work. five years. However, while this may have meant we were not able to meet our KPI this year, it is a critical investment This year costs relating to investment projects in our future and now that we have new people were included in the calculation to provide a more trained and tackling appropriate levels of casework comprehensive measure. However, this means a direct we can become even more productive next year. comparison of this year’s result is not possible with the chart below. To provide a degree of context, had the Looking ahead same methodology as in previous years been used the In addition to digitising and automating services we are target for this year would have been £22.51. introducing a programme of continuous improvement across our offices that will drive out efficiencies, create and share best practice across teams and locations and improve performance across the organisation.

27.16 23.36 19.65 19.29 19.49

2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16

Looking ahead We are very conscious that expressing targets in per unit terms is not completely transparent to our customers and stakeholders. We intend to replace this measure with a cost per type of application measure that will be able to show increased efficiency in our registration work over time in a more transparent way.

49 Innovation PI – We will develop and release a Local Land Charges alpha product, for use by a subset of the selected pilot local authorities, by 31 March 2017 KPI – Average external e-services availability at 99.6% or higher during published service hours We are delivering our ambitious programme to transform the Local Land Charges (LLC) service The availability of our e-services is of critical currently delivered by 326 English local authorities. importance to our business. Most of the In doing so, we will significantly improve the applications our customers submitted were customers’ experience of the LLC process, by making lodged via our e-service channels. it better, quicker and cheaper. This will include: This target is calculated by measuring the ƒƒ a new national digital service with 100% of the availability against advertised service hours searches from a spatially enabled digital register will for five of our online channels. These are: be established;

System Description Published Annual Max daily service hours downtime hours hours

Business Portal for professional customers to access 16.5 6,023 24 e-services our full range of e-services

Business Gateway A seamless interface into customers’ case 16.5 6,023 24 management systems

Inspire A service that provides access to HM Land 8,760 35 Registry index map polygons —

Find a property Service aimed at citizens that provides 18 6,570 26 access to copies of the register

Corporate website HM Land Registry information hosted on 24 8,760 35 GOV.UK

Total 36,136 144

Result for 2016/17 – 99.9%

ƒƒ a reduction in committed turnaround times from a current committed average of eight days to instant online access; and

ƒƒ a reduced price for a LLC official search.

Result for 2016/17 99.6 99.7 99.7 99.9 99.9 At the heart of the new service is our LLC Register Service. We passed our Government Digital 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 Service (GDS) alpha assessment in January 2017. The build of our LLC Register Service was, and Looking ahead continues to be, informed by a significant amount We are planning to invest heavily in new digital of user research across local authorities. services, modernising our IT infrastructure and enhancing our cyber security defences while Looking ahead maintaining the excellent availability seen this year. Our GDS alpha assessment has informed the next stage of the programme and has shaped the remainder of our LLC Register Service build. Subject to approval of our Programme Business Case we plan to incrementally migrate each of the 326 English local authorities to our new register over the next few years. We plan to have the service being used by 50% of local authorities by the end of 2020.

50 Colleagues KPI – To achieve an improvement in the engagement score for leadership and managing change over two years of 15% compared with 2014/15 baseline KPI – To achieve an overall staff engagement score of no less than 57% With an ambitious transformation ahead of us, our ability to lead and manage change will Our success depends upon our people. We will have an be key to our success. We are investing in ambitious strategy to deliver that will require engaged developing our leaders, our change management and committed colleagues. After a prolonged period approach, supporting tools and capability. of uncertainty following two consultations on the future of HM Land Registry in quick succession we have worked hard to engage our people in the debate Result for 2016/17 and provide clarity where certainty cannot exist. The result for this KPI is also taken from the Civil Service People Survey where we achieved Result for 2016/17 a score of 33% - an improvement of 14% in two years, just 1% short of the stretching 15% The result for the KPI is taken from the annual Civil target. Again, in the last internal pulse survey we Service People Survey undertaken in October each achieved a result of 38% which is 4% ahead of the year. We achieved a result of 56% against the target target and a record high for the organisation. of 57%, an improvement of 3% over the previous year. Of course we are disappointed that we did not hit the Just as with the overall engagement score the target by the time of the October Civil Service survey movement over the last two years has been but nonetheless, a 7% increase over only two years is significant, and the February internal survey result a significant improvement. The results of our February puts us in a really strong position for next year. internal pulse survey show that we have enhanced colleague engagement by 59% and put us in a good The baseline for this measure was set in starting position for the next Civil Service survey. 2014/15 where we achieved a score of 19%, rising to 25% in 2015/16.

Engagement index score Looking ahead Leadership and managing change We plan to further enhance our leadership and 59 56 change management capacity and capability through 53 48 48 49 44 45 a combination of new executive level recruitment and 41 38 additional temporary capacity procured from partners 33 26 27 as and when needed to support new initiatives. 22 19 19 19 15

Oct 09 Oct 10 Oct 11 Oct 12 Oct 13 Oct 14 Oct 15 Oct 16 Feb 17 44+41+45+48+48+49+53+56+5919+15+19+26+22+19+27+33+38 PI – Attraction and appointment rates for

Looking ahead candidates applying for roles within HM Land We will continue to drive increased engagement Registry to be representative of the minority and seek to galvanise our people around our ethnic profile of the local labour population new direction with a longer term aim to be where the recruitment takes place in the top quartile of the Civil Service. Prior to 2014 we had not recruited in significant numbers since 2007 and typical length of service is was in excess of 20 years. This resulted in our workforce no longer being representative of the local population where our offices are based. This PI was developed to bring a focus to help address the situation.

Result for 2016/17 We have a two-year diversity target which covers both the attraction and appointment of minority ethnic staff. In our first year we successfully delivered 1.8% above the attraction target, but did not see enough of those applications turn into appointments thereby missing the appointment target by 7.6%.

Looking forward This PI will continue to be a focus. With recruitment planned to take place in the coming year we are looking to build upon the successes we have had in attracting diverse applicants to HM Land Registry and will be looking to turn that attraction into appointments.

51 Sustainability performance Mercedes Fonseca/EyeEm/Getty Images

52 We manage the delivery of land registration in In addition the following requirement within an environmentally responsible way. We utilise the GGC continues to be delivered. our Environmental Management System to ensure we are continually improving and working ƒƒ Continue to pursue public procurement towards the required targets set as part of the practices that are sustainable, so that the Greening Government Commitments (GGC) and government buys more sustainable and the Greening Government ICT requirements. efficient products with the aim of achieving the best overall value for money for society. This report is delivered in line with the 2016/17 guidelines supplied by HM Treasury. Departments will report on the systems they have in place and the action taken to We continue to be accredited to the environmental support this commitment, including: ISO14001 standard which independently ratifies our performance across the full range of ƒƒ to embed compliance with the Government sustainability activities within the organisation. Buying Standards in departmental and centralised procurement contracts, within the context of Current performance against the 2009/10 sustainability government’s overarching priorities of value for baseline data is as follows against the GGC targets. money and streamlining procurement processes; and

ƒƒ to understand and reduce supply chain impacts.

Area Achieved Proposed draft target for 2020 On target?

Carbon 49% reduction 40% reduction Yes

Waste arising Reduce the amount of waste generated by 47% reduction Yes at least 25%

98% recycled Recycle or compost at least 70% of waste Yes

2% to landfill Landfill less than 10% of waste Yes

Water consumption 39% reduction 25% reduction (self-imposed) Yes

Paper consumption Reduce our paper use by 50% from 56% reduction Yes 2009/10 baseline

Performance data against draft GGC targets

Area Performance

Actual 2020 reduction target

Energy: greenhouse Carbon emissions 7,328 7,328 gas emissions, all (tonnes) areas within scope Expenditure (£) 1,485

Waste Consumption 1,105 1,484 (tonnes)

Expenditure (£) 129

Water Consumption (m3) 34,967 38,346

Expenditure (£) 152

53 Sustainability governance Compliance with environmental legislation is managed through the Sustainability Governance Framework and compliance meetings with the facilities management provider Carillion. This is managed through the Sustainability Manager by our Senior Facilities Business Partners and Carillion.

Overall delivery of additional requirements of GGC The targets continue to drive central Government to be more sustainable and ensure the requirements of the Climate Change Act (2008) of a reduction of 31% by 2020 in greenhouse gas emissions is delivered.

Climate change adaptation Climate change impacts are considered during the delivery of building works and projects. We utilise information delivered in building condition surveys and forward maintenance plans as part of our sustainability reduction strategy while carrying out major refurbishments, relocations or when delivering significant building plant replacement. The climate change adaptation plan is under continuous review.

Biodiversity and the natural environment Improvements continue to be introduced where financially viable through Carillion. Improvements continue to be made by a number of initiatives with grounds maintenance, with an emphasis on habitat creation when replanting activity occurs. zoedebala/E+/Getty Images

54 Carbon Gross emissions have reduced by 49% over the baseline.

Consumption of both electricity and gas has reduced over the last year and this is a reflection of the efforts put in through the save@work programme. The reductions are all the more impressive given the additional staff recruited and the extension of hours throughout the year.

The cost of the Carbon Reduction Commitment to the organisation was £157,170.

Our overall reduction in carbon emissions since 2009/10 is 49%. See Appendix D for historic trend data.

Greenhouse gas emission 2016/17 2015/16 2014/15 2013/14 2012/13

Non-financial indicators (tCO2e)

Total gross emissions for scopes 1 and 2 6,818 7,835 8,048 8,404 10,447

Electricity: green/renewable 1,710 1,195 2,306 2,780 2,265

Total net emissions for scopes 1 and 2 5,108 6,640 5,742 5,624 8,182 (ie having removed renewable elements)

Gross emissions scope 3 travel 1 510 557 608 724 893

Total gross reported emissions 7,328 8,392 8,656 9,128 11,340

Non-financial indicators (mWh)

Electricity: purchased (grid, combined 12,808 12,956 12,902 12,200 15,943 heat and power, and non-renewable)

Electricity: renewable — — — — —

Gas 5,774 7,325 6,989 8,355 11,567

Other energy sources — — — — —

Total energy 18,582 20,281 19,891 20,555 27,510

Financial indicators (£’000)

Expenditure on energy 1,485 1,641 1,684 1,810 2,043

Expenditure on accredited offsets (eg Government Carbon Offsettting fund) — — — — —

Expenditure on official business travel 1,231 1,222 1,142 1,240 1,127

1.Gross emissions scope 3 includes all available business travel.

55 Note: data includes other government departments in occupation of our estate, but excludes data relating to non-government tenants. Waste

Note: Ordnance Survey and the NHS who use HM Land Registry data The waste target set is to reduce the amount of waste centre services report their carbon consumption directly to government. generated by at least 25% from a 2009/10 baseline, This equates to 2,730,431KWh resulting in the removal of 1,227 tonnes and strive to reduce it further, recycle or compost at of carbon. least 70% of waste, and landfill less than 10% of waste. Note: throughout this report our consumption data includes government tenants sharing our estate but excludes data relating to non-government In partnership with our waste providers through our tenants. Carillion contract we are working towards zero to landfill. We are currently meeting all of the targets The greenhouse gas draft target set for with performance as follows: the amount of waste all BEIS agencies and public bodies is to generated reduced by 47%, the amount of waste reduce emissions by 40% by March 2020 recycled, diverted or composted is at 98.5% and landfill over the baseline data for 2009/10. is at 1.5% of waste.

Waste 2016/17 2015/16 2014/15 2013/14 2012/13

Non-financial indicators (tonnes)

Hazardous waste 3 1.6 — — —

Landfill waste 13 31.9 105 101 379

Reused/recycled 1,028 972.0 802 858 1,042 Non-Hazardous waste waste Energy from waste 5 6.6 — — —

Total waste arising 1,049 1,012.1 907 959 1,421

Financial indicators (£’000)

Hazardous waste — — — —

Landfill waste 4 180 144 197

Reused/recycled 208 99 146 218 Non-Hazardous waste waste Incinerated waste — — — — —

Total waste costs 129 212 279 290 415

56 Waste management is delivered through two routes. Paper waste is managed through a confidential waste Water consumption disposal contract outside of the facilities management The water target is to continue to further reduce water contract with Carillion. All other waste management is consumption from a 2009/10 baseline. This allows delivered through the facilities management contract. departments to set their own internal targets for water reduction and report on their progress against Of the waste arising 801 tonnes is paper sent for these. Additionally departments will continue to report recycling. Paper equates to 69% of our total waste arising. on office water use (m3 per full-time equivalent).

Our overall reduction in waste production since A 39% reduction in water consumption 2009/10 is 47%. See Appendix X for historic has been achieved against a target of 25%. trend data. Consumption per full-time equivalent, including colleagues on HM Land Registry sites from other government departments, is 6.7m3.

Water consumption 2016/17 2015/16 2014/15 2013/14 2012/13

Non-financial indicators (cubic metres)

Consumption

Supplied 34,967 36,395 38,153 36,037 31,230

Abstracted – – – – –

Total consumption 34,967 36,395 38,153 36,037 31,230

Financial indicators (£’000)

Total supply costs 152 173 188 228 236

— Procurement & Commercial Group Paper usage undertaking an exercise to obtain The GGC reduction target to reduce our paper sustainability information on suppliers. use by 50% from an HM Land Registry baseline year of 2011/12 shows a current improvement Work is also being done to implement the use of 56% over A4 equivalent paper use. Our digital of Contract Sustainability Action Plans. services programme and our move to on-request So far these have been introduced to the printing are having a significant impact. Scanning, Processing & Electronic Data Services and Ordnance Survey contracts and are Sustainable procurement reviewed and updated at supplier meetings. against GGC The Corporate Procurement Team continue to work to maintain and, we hope, improve on Level 3 (Practice) across all categories in the Sustainable Procurement Flexible Framework maturity model. By working with our business stakeholders and key suppliers, the Cabinet Office’s Government Buying Standards are now embedded into our procurement processes.

Key suppliers are to identify and progress opportunities for making social and environmental improvements. We have continued to work on sustainability issues as highlighted by:

— Enterprise, our vehicle hire provider, working closely with us to help identify which category of vehicle will provide the best value for money while at the same time reducing our carbon footprint; and

57 Performance on other matters

Liam Bailey/Photographer’s Choice RF/Getty Images

58 Performance on other matters

The Rule Committee was involved in the Land registration following activities in the past year. We registered the freehold title to 210,786 hectares for the first time, taking the total registered area to ƒƒ In December 2016 the Law Society nominated 12,745,582 hectares or 84.27% of England and Wales. Warren Gordon as its representative on the We adopted a more refined means of measurement Rule Committee in accordance with s.127(2) during the year, so can now exclude any new (d) Land Registration Act 2002. Mr Gordon registrations that do not relate to the freehold surface. replaced Jonathan Smithers who resigned from the Rule Committee on completion of his term as President of the Law Society.

Public Sector Information Holder ƒƒ The Rule Committee was not called on to We fulfil our role as a Public Sector Information Holder, give advice and assistance to the Secretary which we take very seriously, through adherence of State during this period as no land to the Data Protection and Freedom of Information registration rules or fee orders were made. Acts. We mandate annual Responsible for Information ƒƒ In February 2017 the Rule Committee was learning for our people and augment it by promoting asked to consider the consultation on proposals good practice in the areas of email security, password to amend the Land Registration Rules 2003. protection and the use of cloud collaboration This was in preparation for the Rule Committee tools. Our Senior Information Risk Owner (SIRO) carrying out its role of giving advice and assistance oversees an information risk management process, to the Secretary of State through a detailed which is measured through external accreditation consideration of the draft amendments to the (ISO27001) and independently challenged self- rules once the consultation closed in April 2017. assessment (using the Information Assurance Maturity Model – IAMM). We also undertake regular ƒƒ There were no expenses claimed by members of internally and externally assessed Cyber Defence the Rule Committee in the current financial year. Capability Assessment Tool assessments (CDCAT) as part of the Critical National Infrastructure. Modern slavery Open and full information HM Land Registry is committed to ensuring there is no modern slavery or human trafficking in its We received 422 Freedom of Information requests, of supply chains or in any part of the organisation. which 417 were answered within 20 working days. We have taken the following steps to ensure that neither slavery nor human trafficking (together referred to as ‘modern slavery’) have taken Other information place in our organisation or supply chains.

— Recruited and employed colleagues and Rule Committee procured and engaged suppliers and advisers in The Rule Committee was constituted under the Land each case in accordance with robust policies and Registration Act 2002 to provide advice and assistance, procedures which seek to minimise the risk of originally to the but now to the modern slavery occurring in HM Land Registry. Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial — Maintained robust policies and procedures to require Strategy, in making land registration rules and fee HM Land Registry employees to raise concerns about orders under the Act. During the past year the Rule any issue at the earliest possible stage, which would Committee was reclassified from an Advisory Non include any concerns relating to modern slavery Departmental Public Body to an Expert Committee. occurring in our organisation or supply chains.

59 the European Land Registry Association. Having Business Impact Target served four years, his term ends on 11 May 2017. The Government set itself a target to reduce regulatory burdens on business by £10 billion HM Land Registry is part of a coalition of international (Business Impact Target) over the life of the last professional bodies and land experts developing Parliament. When the target was set, it was International Land Measurement Standards anticipated that this Parliament would end in 2020. (ILMS). Launched in June 2016, ILMS seeks to improve land reporting efficiency and economic In common with all parts of government, HM Land development by offering principled standards in the Registry has undertaken impact assessments on all public interest, focusing on key land information to its policy changes since May 2015 to the end of this strengthen land rights, tenure security, investment, financial year. HM Land Registry’s policy changes have government revenue and economic development. resulted in time savings for conveyancers and we estimate that, so far, HM Land Registry has contributed In support of British foreign policy we assist with the to reducing this target by at least £500,000. development of land administration overseas. This year we participated in a UNECE mission to Kazakhstan, a Department for International Development-funded mission to Zambia and a mission to India under the Policy and stakeholders Foreign and Commonwealth Office Prosperity Fund. We ensure our interests are properly represented domestically and globally and the importance of land In the last year we have hosted educational study registration and its benefits are promoted to others. visits for representatives from many jurisdictions Our Policy & Stakeholder hub sits as part of the Chief including Botswana, China, Malawi, Serbia and Zambia. Land Registrar’s Office, giving us a presence across We also welcomed our new Minister, Lord Prior of government and counterpart organisations overseas. Brampton, and the then Minister of State for Housing Gavin Barwell to our Croydon office in March. The main focus for the hub during the year was leading the cross-government Strategic Review of HM Land We responded to 13 written and oral Parliamentary Registry where it worked with colleagues from across Questions about HM Land Registry and supported the organisation and other government departments other departments with responses to their questions. on policies aiming to complete the Land Register and increase transparency in the housing market.

Following 2015’s inaugural stakeholder event, this year’s event held in November 2016 at the Royal Society in London was attended by an increased number of stakeholders from a wide range of organisations. We had the pleasure of welcoming the then Minister with responsibility Graham Farrant for HM Land Registry, Margot James MP. Chief Executive and Chief Land Registrar HM Land Registry representatives hold positions 11 July 2017 on various international forums, including Nicky Heathcote on the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Committee for Housing and Land Management, Howard Bushell on the UNECE Working Party on Land Administration and Andrew Trigg on the EuroGeographics Management Board. Alasdair Lewis continued as President of

60 Mark Sykes/AWL Images/Getty Images Sykes/AWL Mark

61 62 Accountability report Corporate governance report

The LRB terms of reference which The Chair, the Chief Executive Directors’ report were first approved in 2012 were and Chief Land Registrar and the Details of directors and revised during 2015/16. Director of Finance and Business boards Services also held quarterly The LRB meets formally meetings with UK Government Board to HM Land Registry approximately 10 times per year, Investments (UKGI). Accountability report The remit of the Board to HM with additional meetings as and Land Registry (LRB) is to support, when required. It met 11 times in advise, challenge and provide 2016/17. guidance. The LRB ensures good governance and public accountability, endorses the HM LRB membership Land Registry strategy and assists Michael Mire (Chair) Non-Executive Chair (from 8 August 2016) the Chief Executive and Chief Land Registrar in his ultimate Tim Franklin Non-Executive Member and Senior Independent responsibility as Accounting Director (Interim Chair from 1 April 2016) Officer for the governance and Catrina Holme Non-Executive Member performance of HM Land Registry. Gerard Connell Non-Executive Member Leo Geddes Non-Executive Member (to 30 September 2016) Graham Farrant Chief Executive and Chief Land Registrar Claire Wren Non-Executive Member (from 16 January 2017) John Peaden Director of Operations Catherine Vaughan Director of Finance and Business Services Note: Mike Westcott Rudd attends as Board Legal Adviser.

The Board to HM Land Registry (from left to right): Mike Westcott Rudd, Catherine Vaughan, Michael Mire, Graham Farrant, Catrina Holme, John Peaden, Tim Franklin, Claire Wren and Gerard Connell

63 Executive Board Executive Board membership The Executive Board (EXB) is chaired by the Chief Executive Graham Farrant (Chair) Chief Executive and Chief Land Registrar and Chief Land Registrar and its Craig Lester Assistant Chief Executive members are HM Land Registry’s (to 31 October 2016) executive directors. The EXB is responsible for the delivery John Peaden Director of Operations of HM Land Registry’s Annual Alasdair Lewis Director of Legal Services and Deputy Chief Management Plan and for the day- Land Registrar to-day operational management of the organisation. The EXB Catherine Vaughan Director of Finance and Business Services meets on a monthly basis and met Caroline Anderson Director of Human Resources and on 10 occasions throughout the Organisation & Employee Development course of the year. John Abbott Director of Digital Services Mike Westcott Rudd Board Legal Adviser Attendees Nicky Heathcote Head of the Chief Land Registrar’s Office

Audit Committee Audit Committee membership The committee supports the LRB and the Accounting Officer Tim Franklin (Chair) Non-Executive Member by seeking assurance on the Gerard Connell Non-Executive Member risk management framework, the control framework, Derrick Palmer Independent member of the Audit Committee governance and compliance with policies, procedures and Attendees external standards and statutory requirements. Graham Farrant Chief Executive and Chief Land Registrar Catherine Vaughan Director of Finance and Business Services Grahame Hughes Head of Internal Audit Representative of the National Audit Office National Audit Office Representative(s) of UKGI UKGI

Remuneration and Nomination Remuneration and Nomination Committee membership Committee The committee agrees pay Catrina Holme Non-Executive Member strategy and authorises the Gerard Connell Non-Executive Member annual pay review for HM Land Registry Senior Civil Service Caroline Anderson Director of Human Resources and staff and agrees a strategy for Organisation & Employee Development succession to the LRB and EXB. Graham Farrant Chief Executive and Chief Land Registrar

Register of interests A register of interests is maintained at HM Land Registry Head Office. See note 20 to the accounts for related party disclosures.

64 Accountability report

The Executive Board: Mike Westcott Rudd, Alasdair Lewis, Caroline Anderson, Graham Farrant, Catherine Vaughan, John Abbott and John Peaden

Personal data-related incidents There were no personal data- related incidents reported to the Information Commissioner’s Office during the year.

Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest reported.

65 Other accountabilities Health and safety Welsh language service Use of our Customer Relationship We have continued to develop the Information about our Welsh Management tool has facilitated comprehensive health and safety language service can be found further opportunities to learn from management system we have on our website: www.gov.uk/ and act on customer feedback in place to ensure compliance government/organisations/ and improve our overall service. with legislative and regulatory land-registry/about/ Examples of this included requirements, monitor the welsh-language-scheme. enhancements to our: adequacy of health and safety — online guidance and policies and promote continual Complaints information on GOV.UK to improvement and awareness in We recorded 2,464 complaints in further improve the ease this area. 2016/17 compared with 2,088 in of navigation and clarity of 2015/16. information on certain types of There has been a focus on application and fees; workplace risk assessments this The increase in the complaints year, with a complete review recorded can mainly be attributed — guidance and processes to undertaken and assessments to greater consistency in the provide a better service to relaunched. A new online driving recording of customer feedback. customers in resolving their training package has been rolled Also an increase in feedback enquiries/complaints about out across the organisation and about: our scanning, processing all staff have attended briefing and electronic delivery sessions providing advice on — our speed of service on some services. Also ensuring their actions to take in the event of types of application, the feedback was acted upon an armed assault on one of our overall workload position and by the commercial provider properties or other public spaces. keeping customers informed concerned; about what we are doing to reduce processing times; and — online information on average The total number of accidents completion times with the aim reported by HM Land Registry — the transition to a new of being more transparent staff at work was 117 with three commercial provider for our about our processing times accidents reported to the Health scanning, processing and across all types of application. and Safety Executive under the electronic delivery services, Also the launch of a new Reporting of Injuries Diseases particularly concerning delay tool for customers to query and Dangerous Occurrences and quality issues. progress and request Regulations. prioritisation of urgent The overall proportion of upheld applications online, without We have retained our certification complaints was 40%. Customer the need for them to call us; to OHSAS18001, the British feedback about delays in our and Standard for health and safety processing of some registration management. This has been applications was the most — Business e-services, to further maintained following six-monthly common area of upheld complaint, improve its usability and audits by external assessors comprising 27% of the upheld accessibility and increase and provides assurance that we total. the number of application remain aligned with recognised results, notifications and best practice. We developed and introduced new documentation delivered electronic tools and processes for electronically. Also improving Service standards complaint recording, reporting the way we notify customers their applications results are Details of the service that and analysis to further improve available. customers can expect from us the consistency and quality of can be found on our website: feedback recording and give Security incidents www.gov.uk/ government/ improved insight. The roll-out of Physical security is overseen organisations/land-registry/about/ an updated staff training package by the Physical and Personnel about- our-services. on complaints handling and Security Panel. There were 55 recording continued during the recorded incidents during the year, first quarter of 2016/17 to increase including one significant (Class 1) our people’s awareness of the incident. importance of effective complaint handling and recording.

66 Accountability report 67 Managing Public Public Managing . HM Treasury has appointed has HM Treasury the Chief Executive of HMLand Registry as the Accounting Officer for the trading fund. The responsibilities of Accounting an responsibilityOfficer, including for the propriety regularity and of the finances public for which the Accounting Officer answerable, is for keeping proper records for and safeguarding HM Land Registry’s assets, are set the out in Accounting Officers’ Memorandum issued by and HM Treasury published in Money So far aware as I am there no is relevant information audit of which the auditor unaware, is theand directors taken have all the steps that they to ought have takendirectorsas order in to make themselves aware of relevant any informationaudit to and establish that the auditor aware is of that information. As Accounting Officer I confirm that report the annual and accounts as a whole a fair, is balanced understandable and of HM Landaccount Registry’s operational financial and performance take I and personal responsibility for report the annual accountsand the and judgements required for determining that is it balanced understandable. and fair, p m s o going concern basis when appropriate to do so. estimates on a reasonable basis; accounting standards as set the out in Government ReportingFinancial Manual beenhave followed and disclose explain and any material departures the in accounts; and issued by HM Treasury, issued by HM Treasury, theincluding relevant disclosureaccounting and requirements, apply and suitable accounting policies on a consistent basis;

— repare the accounts on a — tate whether applicable — judgementsake and — bservethe Accounts Direction In preparingIn the accounts, the Accounting Officer required is to comply with the requirements of the Government Financial Reportingparticular in and Manual to: Statement of Accounting Officer’s responsibilities Under Section 4(6)of the Act Funds Government Trading directedhas HM Treasury 1973 HM Land Registry to prepare for each financial a statement year of accounts the in form on and the basis set the out in Accounts Direction referred to note in 1.1. The accounts are prepared on an accruals basisgive must and a true fair view and of the state of affairs of HM Land Registry and of its expenditure, income and changes reserves in cash and flows for the financial year. Governance statement Scope of responsibility Purpose of the governance − non-financial delegation As the Accounting Officer for framework letters to members of the HM Land Registry I have The governance framework Executive Board (EXB); responsibility, advised by the is designed to give assurance − delegations of financial Board to HM Land Registry that HM Land Registry carries authorities designed to reflect (LRB), for maintaining corporate out its duties in a manner that the external framework governance structures that fulfils the appropriate standards set and revised by the support the achievement of HM of effective internal control Cabinet Office, BEIS and UK Land Registry’s aims, objectives and risk management. It is Government Investments and targets, while safeguarding based on processes designed (UKGI); and public funds and HM Land to identify and prioritise the Registry’s assets. opportunities and risks to the − EXB-member led committees delivery of HM Land Registry’s of the EXB. HM Land Registry is a non- strategy, the strategic objectives The Business Strategy 2013-2018 ministerial government and performance targets. The set out five-year objectives. That department, a trading fund and governance statement is designed strategy is currently in the process an . Ministerial to help the organisation achieve of being replaced in the light of oversight is provided by the its objectives. Department for Business, Energy the Government’s commitments about HM Land Registry in the and Industrial Strategy (BEIS). It is also designed to align with Chancellor’s Autumn Statement My duties as Accounting Officer the strategic aims of BEIS and and the Housing White Paper are set out in Managing Public our statutory duties as set out in Fixing our broken housing market. Money. I am accountable for our Framework Document 2012, performance and stewardship, which is currently being revised. The new strategy currently guided by the LRB, to the This framework has been in place being developed is designed to Secretary for State for BEIS throughout 2016/17 and up to the challenge HM Land Registry to with day-to-day responsibility date of approval of the accounts. contribute effectively to improving delegated to the Parliamentary The new Framework Document will the conveyancing process Under Secretary of State. comply with the new Partnerships and the availability of housing between departments and arm’s- alongside other government policy The main duties relating to length bodies: Code of Practice initiatives. Those objectives have maintaining the register of title to 2017. freehold and leasehold land and been set in addition to the normal charges are defined in the Land drivers to improve all aspects of Key elements of the business performance and set Registration Act 2002 and those governance framework relating to Land Charges and out an ambition to become the The governance framework Agricultural Credits are defined world’s leading land registry for includes: in the Land Charges Act 1975 speed, simplicity and openness and the Agricultural Credits Act − HM Treasury letter appointing of data. HM Land Registry is also 1928 (see the Performance report the Accounting Officer; aiming to achieve comprehensive overview). registration by 2030. − Framework Document 2012 (currently being reviewed); The Infrastructure Act 2015 HM Land Registry set itself seven widened the scope of HM Land − LRB terms of reference and key performance indicators Registry’s powers, enabling us to minutes; for 2016/17 and has met its build on the property services we targets in most areas, including − Audit Committee terms of the quality of its processing of already provide. The legislation reference and minutes; also provides that HM Land substantive applications, its Registry will become the − Remuneration and Nomination unit cost, the availability of its registering authority for the Committee terms of reference external services and its customer statutory Local Land Charges and minutes; satisfaction ratings. HM Land register in place of individual local Registry has narrowly missed − other committee minutes and its key performance targets for authorities and will hold those communication points; records on a single digital register. the number of units processed − ministerial endorsement of the per person per day set for the direction of travel articulated financial year 2016/17, which in the Business Strategy; has contributed to increased delays in achieving the speed of − delegations of budget; service targets and the backlogs

68 Accountability report 69 h a m t p t t e c indicators are presented howand HM Land Registry’s progress them against is measured. it operatesit order in to make better use of expertise to support strategic decisions; strategy the and formal change programmes including the Local Land Charges Programme; proposals for a new Customer Strategy; Transformation Programme; strategic issues affecting the delivery content and of the Business Strategy; theand safety of HM Land Registry data; closer working links between HM Land Registry and Ordnance Survey; and

— ow key performance — edium-term financial — he ICT Strategy the and — rogress the against — he approach to the major — he controls for cyber security — xploring the potential for During 2016/17 the LRBDuring endorsed: 2016/17 — hanges to the way which in

S C T R M and theand arrival of the new Chair (Michael Mire). The LRB’s role main to is support, advise, constructively challenge provideand tothe guidance Chief Executive the and EXB. It should also ensure that HM Land Registry workingis within a framework of prudent effective and governance arrangements controls and which riskenable to be appropriately assessed managed. As and part of that function, the LRB should endorse the key activities that HM Land Registry will need to undertake to meet the strategic objectives (set the out in Annual publishedPlan on GOV.UK), support the Chief Executive ensuringin the necessary resourcesfinancial human and are for place in to it meet these objectives, regularly and review performance relation in to agreed targets delivery and of the approved Plan. The Annual LRB should also endorse HM Land Registry’s vision values and and ensure its obligations to BEIS, as its sponsor department, and itsall stakeholders (including customers, employees other and government departments) are understood met. and Thenon-executive members are independent of management. There were no examples of company appointments or consultancy arrangements held by them that give could rise to a potential conflict of interest with their responsibilities as members of the LRB. In line with line In Cabinet Office theguidance LRB tasked is with advising on, supervising, and five areas.main — — trategic clarity. — ommercial sense. — alented people. — esults focus. information.anagement The Board to Land HM Registry purpose

The LRB consists of a Non- Executive four other non- Chair, executive members, including a representative from UKGI and three EXB members, being myself as Chief Executive Chief and Land Registrar, the Director of Finance Businessand Services the and Director of Operations. The LRB Legal Adviser also attends the meetings. The LRB structure ensures between a balance executive non-executive and membership. the During the year, Senior Independent Director acted interregnum in as Chair to cover the between gap the departure of the existing Chair (Mark Boyle) TheLRB recognises the importance of leadership to create environment an where performance risk and are managed effectively. The Board to Land HM Registry HM Land Registry missed just has its targets for staff engagement staffand perception of the leadership within the organisation as measured the against annual Civil Service staff satisfaction survey undertaken every autumn. That survey was carried out thein context of the expected privatisation of the organisation. Now that the sector public status beenhas announced, more optimism exists as more recent internal surveys demonstrate. We continuedhave to excellent make progress this in respect had and exceeded the target by the year end, but not the in official Civil Service survey. continue to We ourselveschallenge to meet that target the in Civil Service survey next financial year. backlogs increased have to due a variety of factors a including than forecasthigher proportion of more time-consuming and complex applications. HM Land Registry continuing is to make steady progress to address this toand take measures to reduce backlogs even It also is further. delivering efficiency across gains the organisation. of work to be processed. Those Committees of the LRB Remuneration and Nomination and better communication of Committee strategic initiatives throughout the Audit Committee Membership of the Remuneration organisation. The Audit Committee supports the Committee comprises myself and LRB and the Accounting Officer non-executives Catrina Holme Transformation Board by seeking assurances through (Chair) and Gerard Connell, The Transformation Board has information and reports over: advised by Director of Human been introduced, is working — the strategic framework and Resources and Organisation & effectively and is monitored on a process for risk management, Employee Development Caroline regular basis. control and governance and Anderson. Its purpose is to ensure this governance statement; that remuneration and nomination During the year the arrangements, including senior Transformation Board has — the accounting policies, the pay strategy, support HM Land prioritised resource allocation accounts and the annual Registry’s aims and enable to critical change. It has used a report of the organisation, the recruitment, retention and maturing governance and decision including levels of error performance of the executive framework for understanding identified, and management’s team. It has met three times business priority with improved letter of representation to the during this financial year. control, more integrated external auditors; financial monitoring through — the risk-based planned activity Executive Board enhanced links with Finance and results of both Internal The EXB assists me to lead teams and better governance Audit and External Audit; and manage HM Land Registry over change activities. Use of a clear prioritisation model helps — the adequacy of management to ensure the delivery of the the Transformation Board to response to issues identified objectives and business targets, review the priorities against the by audit activity, including the successful implementation of organisation’s strategic aims External Audit’s management an approved Business Strategy, alongside an expanded Portfolio letter; annual plans and compliance with the Framework Document. Through Report which now tracks both — assurances relating to the mechanism of individual business impacts and people corporate governance letters of delegation, members of implications. An Assurance requirements for the the Executive Board handle the Strategy has been implemented to organisation; day-to-day running of HM Land oversee how the Transformation — counter-fraud policies, Registry, including: Board approaches its work and whistleblowing processes and each of the portfolio risk registers — monitoring KPIs and overall is reviewed on a monthly basis the arrangements for special budget; investigations; and following dialogue with each — managing risks to the project and programme manager — ongoing compliance with organisation; that is encapsulated in a monthly the International Standards report. for the Professional Practice — taking financial decisions; of Internal Auditing and the — managing and controlling the The work undertaken provides Public Sector Internal Audit trading fund; better tracking of the projects’ Standards (PSIAS). implementation and of benefits — dealing with customer issues; realisation. These include the The Audit Committee also and periodically reviews its own financial savings in the Coventry effectiveness and reports the — escalating important issues to Office relocation, where surplus results of that review to the LRB. the LRB for review. office equipment was sold or donated to charitable causes. I continue to use a Leadership Membership of the Audit Quarterly Leadership Group Group, drawn from the first-tier presentations by project senior Committee comprises non- managers below executive board executive members Tim Franklin responsible owners allow the level, to help formulate and take Transformation Board and (Chair), Gerard Connell and Derrick forward some of the ideas and Palmer (Independent Member of other senior leaders to see the detail for policy and strategy breadth and progress of all the Audit Committee). The Director around land registration and of Finance and Business Services, programmes and projects. It also its associated activities and to highlights interdependencies and Catherine Vaughan, the Board support the change programmes. Legal Adviser and I attend these opportunities between projects. I have also held meetings with A recent successfully delivered meetings. The Head of Internal the Strategic Leadership Network, Audit is also present. project has seen a new intranet which comprised of almost 100 launched which is much more middle and senior managers, four interactive, easily searchable and times this year to enable their user focused than its predecessor. participation in strategic decisions

70 Accountability report 71 , which sought to engage Delivering our Business Delivering Business our appropriately briefed through a range of mechanisms, a including major communication programme called Strategy every member of staff seven in interactiveweb-based modules a face-to-faceand group session chaired by to a senior manager themhelp to all understand the principles behind the strategy. , including the, including staged release of data our to meet Open Data other and government data objectives to defined quality standards overseeing in and changes to the way that data is published or supplied. The implementation of recommendations from that internal governance review led to the introduction of two new panels as well as the creation of new a Local Land Charges Design Authority enhanced and decision-making by ensuring that minutes from boththe Information CommitteeManagement the and are Committee Protection Register routinely copied to the EXB. We are currently reviewing how best to extend the remit of the Design Authority to support the wider transformation programme. Thenew Assurance Panel will provide independent oversight of the quality of the work we do to create update and registers our oversight alsoand enhance of directorateour risk monitoring processes the and breadth of governance matters covered by this statement. Panel A new Cyber will draw together experts across various parts of the organisation to provide holistic oversight of our work to understand the strategic cyber risk proactively and manage the cyber threats to the availability integrityand of registers our and the personal data about staff and customers that we also hold. Both of these panels are incorporated into the revised Governance Framework. Progress the against strategic targets detailed is the in report Performance five milestones contributing to the strategy addition In this year. to these milestones the Local Land Charges Programme Outline Business Case was developed as described below. Last I revised year the vision and values for HM Land Registry to provide a better strategic context for operations our support and staffing. All staff now have been Statement on strategy update Committee structures revised The committees of the EXB are supported by a range of panels which are chaired by senior managers. review Anannual of internal governance undertaken November confirmedin 2016 the effective working of the Commercial Governance and Data panels. The Data Panel was introduced the in last financial year to cover matters such as licensing aspects of the Information CommitteeManagement work. The Data Panel also plays a vital role proactively in supporting the This body now performs a rolevaluable bringing in clarity to the procurement pipeline through the procurement use of annual an plan. Its scrutiny of spending proposals led has to a more disciplined strategic and approach to commercial decision-making. Frivolous spending been has eliminated ‘value and for money’ beenhas reprioritised to favour cost over excessive During quality. this was achieved2016/17 by proposedchallenging commercial arrangements. some In cases contracts offering best value have been extended to lock benefits in for longer periods. other In cases competition been has encouraged areasin that traditionally had been single-sourced. Commercial Governance Panel The Commercial Governance Panel provides additional an layer of internal governance for expenditure on external goods servicesand over £100,000. The panel supports HM Land Registry’sdelegations of authority, providing assurance to the Director Business of and Finance Services Accounting and Officer withinfor spending falling all their expenditure limits, overseeing significant contract awards and contract extensions other and changes.It ensuresexpenditure all theand proposed procurement route will deliver the best value for with money compliant is and procurementpublic legislation and Cabinet Office controls. Attendance schedule for LRB, Audit Committee and Remuneration Committee

Title Period Board Committee (appointment LRB Audit Remuneration relates to whole of the reporting year unless otherwise specified) Non-executive Gerard Connell Non-Executive Member 10/11 3/4 3/3 Tim Franklin Non-Executive Member Interim Chair from 11/11 4/4 3/3 (and Senior Independent 1.4.16 to 7.8.16 Director) Leo Geddes1 Non-Executive Member Appointment 5/5 – – UK Government ended 30.9.16 Investments Catrina Holme Non-Executive Member 9/11 – 3/3 Michael Mire Non-Executive Chair From 8.8.16 6/7 – – Derrick Palmer Non-Executive Member – 4/4 – (Audit Committee) Claire Wren1 Non-Executive Member From 16.1.17 1/2 – – UK Government Investments Executive Graham Farrant Chief Executive and 11/11 4/4 3/3 Chief Land Registrar Craig Lester2 Assistant Chief Executive Appointment 3/4 – – ended 31.10.16 John Peaden Director of Operations 10/11 4/4 – Catherine Vaughan Director of Finance and 10/11 4/4 – Business Services Caroline Anderson Director of Human – – 3/3 Resources and Organisation & Employee Development Mike Westcott Rudd3 Board Legal Adviser 10/11 4/4 –

1. UK Government Investments was commenced on 24 March 2016 HM Land Registry to the economy, represented at all LRB meetings. and closed on 26 May 2016. and should be completed without 2. Craig Lester attended as an observer. The Government’s response to the the need for significant exchequer 3. Mike Westcott Rudd attends as Legal consultation is still to be published investment.” Adviser to the Board. but the following statement was Statement on ministerial made in the Autumn Statement Since that announcement, HM decision 2016. Land Registry has undertaken a strategic review of its plans to In the Spending Review and “Following consultation the ensure we continue to play our Autumn Statement 2015, the government has decided that part in delivering the Government Government announced its HM Land Registry should focus on agenda. On 7 February 2017, the intention to “consult on options becoming a more digital data- Department for Communities and to move operations of the Land driven registration business, Local Government published the Registry to the private sector and to do this will remain in the Housing White Paper, which sets from 2017”, which commitment public sector. Modernisation will out in detail the Government’s was repeated in the Budget in maximise the value of housing agenda and commits HM March 2016. The consultation

72 Accountability report

73 new whistleblowing cases were reported During 2016/17 year. in the whistleblowing process was the subject of Internal an Audit report the and recommendations from been have thataudit fully implemented. The found audit that although the whistleblowing policy procedure and compliant is with government policy best and practice, more was required to ensure staff managers line and were aware of the policy and actions now have been taken to ensure this. Risk Framework for risk management HM Land Registry follows OrangeHM Treasury Book risk principles.management These principles formed a key element thein establishment of a new risk framework, management strategy standard and which was developed during 2015/16. These significant changes, designed to ensure a controlled consistent and two-way flow of risks between strategic directorate and level, beenhave implemented in planned stages over the last two years the and last phases of which are now being implemented, with riska single register established this for directorates year all apart from Information Systems whose risks are currently being added. Attention will then turn to the further integration of details of programme project and risks considerations into the more transparent directorate and strategic risk planning. The LRB, EXB Audit Committee and consider strategicall risks. The LRB Legal Adviser acts as the EXB’s risk champion. The strategic risks are reviewed quarterly and key changes flagged to the EXB; additionin a more thorough risk review completed is each quarter facilitated by the Risk Manager. Lead indicators are monitored to provide early warning of changes strategicin risk which are then upon. acted a prior review by the Performance Panel. performanceFinancial is monitored reported and using monthlyreports based on our financial system. During the year I introduced monthly “snapshot figures” reports which provide early of sight the month-end position advance in of the full monthly financial reports. There a procedureis for setting annual budgets reviewing and financial performance full-year and forecasts. Quarterly forecast reviews are operation in giving the EXB LRB and appropriate oversight assurance and and monthly updates are provided via the Chief Executive’s monthly report to the LRB. HM Land Registry operates a ofnumber models critical to its core business. These include models to forecast intakes fee and operationalincome; an forecast model for workload, resources backlog;and models to support standard and management financial reporting. These models are subject to and challenge forecasts are and reported to and reviewed by the EXB the and LRB. During the we year added a new financial model, which was created to to input the Local Land Charges Programme business case. During the we year used a revised operational modelling and toolplanning (for establishment control intended to improve for theplanning allocation of resources to workload and better evaluation of resource requirement linked to forecast our intakes people and budgets) but the tool was found not to be as robust as we require to it be. Work commencedhas on improvingthis detailed operational resourcing model to address identified weaknesses we surfaced have through its use. The sponsoring EXB member is the Director of Legal Services. No Whistleblowing – statement of arrangements and results

The Performance Panel of senior managers established the in last financial enhances year the scrutiny of organisational performance leads and developments to better use the performanceavailable data. Performance now is reported to the EXB monthly with the additional intelligence gained by Information about quality of data TheInfrastructure Act 2015 provides the basis on which HM Land Registry can become the registering authority hold and the statutory Local Land Charges register of place in the 326 English local authorities. satisfied I am that the governance risk and arrangementsmanagement for the programme are appropriate proportionate.and I base this conclusion on the Infrastructure Projectand Authority‘s (IPA) (formerly the Project Major Authority) reports which gave the programme amber Delivery an Confidence Assessment rating 11 made November and in 2016 recommendations to assist HM Land Registry with preparing for actual delivery. HM Land Registry addressing is those recommendations reviewing and progress them against monthly. I also receive progress reports and assurances from the programme senior responsible This owner. involves monthly reporting to the LLC Programme Board and complete review risks, of all theincluding associated strategic risk, on a quarterly basis. Local Land Charges – statement on governance a comprehensive register by 2030. addition,In theGovernment is looking actions at to improve the visibility of information relating to arrangements used to exercise control over As land. part of that, the Government will investigate ways which in the Land Register can better reflect interests all with land in the ultimate of aim providing of clear sight” line “a across a piece setting of land out ownership, control interests. and Land Registry to to achieve aiming Key strategic and programme opportunity for escalation. including among external risks Risk management systems are suppliers where 74% of suppliers Significant improvements have designed to be proportionate and are achieving level 3 maturity. been implemented in the way that effective in relation to relevant we manage our key strategic risks risks. The Risk Management Protecting information over the last year providing a more Strategy ensures that risks are All staff are required to complete holistic overview of the strategic effectively mitigated at all levels of the appropriate levels of the risks better aligned to the lower the organisation. Responsible for Information (RFI) level directorate and project risks. module on Civil Service Learning There are currently 14 strategic I am also assured by the work (CSL) on an annual basis. In risks. There is now significant of the Information Management 2016/17 we have augmented emphasis on the risks around Committee, the Register Protection this RFI learning with additional cyber security, financial planning Committee, the People Committee in-house material to improve and legacy systems. and the Health and Safety Panel, awareness of risks associated all of which play an integral part with collaborating in the cloud and The highest priority this year has in the overall risk management emails sent to insecure accounts. been our people risk given the matrix. Management of the Contractors are also obliged to challenges we faced and still face financial risks, information risk, sign a non-disclosure agreement. with succession planning and risk to the Land Register, fraud recruitment. The impact of this risk risk and health and safety and We have been certified to has been proactively managed statutory duties are managed by ISO27001, the international with the introduction of our People these committees with escalation standard for information security Strategy and Estates Strategy, to me as appropriate, at the management, for almost 14 years. along with our development of our discretion of the relevant director The standard works on a three- tactical recruitment plan, leaving for each committee, but informed yearly recertification cycle and we us in a much stronger position to by their letters of delegation. were recertificated in March 2017. fill key vacancies. Stability in the Executive Team has also been I am informed on the effectiveness The standard is comprehensive maintained through 2016/17. of operational controls to manage and includes IT security, risk, safeguard assets and ensure physical security, information In addition to the strategic effective use of resources through management, business continuity risks, the Transformation Board a framework of controls which and risk management. maintains and reviews a cross- includes reporting at local and directorate risk register relating to organisational level. Performance the delivery of HM Land Registry information is structured to ensure Data losses change initiatives. The LLC issues requiring management There were no personal data- Programme Board maintains and action are reported appropriately. related incidents reported to the regularly reviews a similar risk Information Commissioner’s Office register for the LLC Programme. during the year. Information and cyber risk Information risk is managed Framework for control and risk through the Information Response to HMRC tax management Management Committee led compliance review The evaluation of second- by the Senior Information Risk During the year HMRC concluded tier risks at directorate level Owner (SIRO) and Board Legal its audit of HM Land Registry identified key risks around Adviser. The SIRO is assured records to ensure the organisation backlog of work and people by information risk returns was meeting its tax obligations challenges regarding training and carried out by our Information as an employer. The relationship development for our new recruits Asset Owners (IAOs) and fully with HMRC was proactively and apprentices. These risks are documented asset descriptions. managed, with all information being carefully monitored and Our IS Risk Management and data provided to the auditor are being fed into our refreshed Process and Policy have been in a timely and proactive way. A Business Strategy. A supportive independently audited, validated one-off retrospective tax liability and dynamic relationship is and accredited through CMMI, of £555,277.36 was agreed maintained between the Head of ISO20000 and ISO27001 (£544,048 plus interest charges of Risk Management and business and the Cabinet Office Cyber £11,172). stakeholders. Defence Capability Assessment Tool (CDCAT). I am assured HMRC’s penalties can be reduced As Accounting Officer I maintain by accreditation in respect of based on how an organisation oversight of strategic risks Public Service Network Code responds to the audit and how it managed by the EXB and seek of Connection and Information remedies the issues identified. I assurances on directorate risk Assurance Maturity Model (IAMM) am able to report that HMRC has management to afford the where our scores have improved agreed the maximum possible

74 Accountability report 75 An integrated approach to 2017/18 budgeting and business planning allowedhas fora greater focus the on building 2017/18 establishment figure to meet business needs a tactical and forplan the being is ahead year created. This will ensure help we thehave staff we need when we need them without increasing the permanent headcount. In addition,work been has prioritised around the digitisation of most our straightforward transactions to be handled electronically, releasing more casework staff to process Sources of assurance Infrastructure and Project Authority (LLC) TheLocal Land Charges Programme a significant is programme subject to review by the Government’s IPA. The first draft of the programme business case consideration. under is NovemberIn the 2016, IPA undertook a Gateway 0 Review resulting amber Delivery an in Confidence Assessment (DCA). This on the built of ’Assurance Action’ Review undertaken in January which also 2016 gave Amberan DCA, improving on the red/amber assessment given in August 2015 we as move forward with the development of plans. our the more complex applications. Despite these measures, we have not been to able meet the targets but continue to strive to make reductions the in backlog and develop to this plans manage going forward. Litigation (tribunal cases) There been have no cases in 2016/17. An Internal Audit April in 2017 thisgave process substantial assurance. It alsoconcluded that appropriate action been had taken to with ensure compliance BEIS requirements new and tax legislation for the forthcoming year. Action taken to improve service speeds As the in previous financial year, HM Land Registry continued has to experience significantly higher levels of intake above the level forecast month by month during despite post-Brexit 2016/17, predictions of reduced activity thein housing market. One consequence of the continuing levelshigh of intake been has a slower than anticipated reduction thein levels of work not completed within speed our of service targets. The for plans 2016/17 were specifically designed to meet new internal service standards reduceand the backlog to no more than seven working days’ worth of intakes by March 2017. Resource deficiencies frontline in staff been have somewhat eased by the successful recruitment of 300 full-time equivalents the in first of the half followed year by the recruitment of further staff on fixed-term appointments in Over the coming January 2017. months, most of those fixed-term appointees will be retained for a further period beyond their initial contractual term a further and tranche of apprentices will be required the in first quarter of Tranche the next financial year. 2 apprentices with Operations (apprenticeships to due mature October/Novemberin will 2017) also be retained as permanent employees. Although we are currently employing greater numbers of staff to assist us to deliver our services, we use made have of mechanisms to us to enable flex staffingour requirements the in future through the use of casual fixed-termand appointments and the employment of apprentices.

I am assuredI am by the Director of Business and Finance Services theand Director of HR and Organisation & Employee Development that HM Land Registry now robust place in has processes for ongoing monitoring off-payrollof contractors all forand seeking the relevant tax NIC and assurances on a rolling basis for and adjusting to the new payroll arrangements being brought on in 1 April 2017. My HR Directorate have responsibility for off-payroll contractors. They are supported by close oversight who Finance in contact relevant all contractors for assurance the at appropriate trigger points. Scrutiny of the oversight been has delegated to me as Accounting Officer HM at Land Registry. HM Land Registry continues to monitor the systems and procedures relating to off-payroll contractors to comply with requirementschanging to provide assurance contractors that all engaged by HM Land Registry are complying with appropriate tax NICand regulations. assured I am ofthat mostour all senior staff are now on payroll we and comply with the Alexander Review this in regard. Response to Alexander Review and guidance for off-payroll contractors revised and recruitment processes while the maximum penalty due 15%is of the tax National and Insurance contributions (NIC), this payment was suspended as proactive changes been have implemented to the suite of existing policies procedures. and The methodology designed by HM Land Registry been has cited by HMRC as best practice. We summarisedhave this approach passedand to it HMRC and other departments for their also have use. introduced We a monitoring auditing process and for travel subsistence, and oversightincluding by the People Committee, to ensure ongoing compliance. reduction should be applied and Cyber defence Central controls Financial management reporting As part of the central government My role as Chief Executive I am informed on HM Land oversight of cyber security and Chief Land Registrar is to Registry performance through matters, the Office of Cyber carry out the role of Chief Land the monthly financial reports Security and Information Registrar referred to in the from my Director of Finance and Assurance (OCSIA) was created Land Registration Act 2002, the Business Services which includes to support the National Security Land Charges Act 1972 and the analysis of forecast workload Council to determine priorities in Agricultural Credits Act 1928 and intakes and the likely impact on relation to securing cyberspace. the Local Land Charges Act 1975 revenues needed to finance the In November 2015 HM Land as amended by the Infrastructure operational activities. During the Registry started working with Act 2015. The Chief Executive year my Director of Finance and them as part of a collective is responsible for keeping the Business Services has led the government cyber security registers established for the response to the CIPFA Financial programme. This led to the purposes of those Acts and has all Management Model report leading first–time review of our cyber the powers, responsibilities and to enhancements in the quality of security position using the CDCAT duties conferred and imposed on management reporting, enhanced in respect of the critical national the registrar by those Acts and support and ensuring the skills infrastructure data we hold. That by the rules and other secondary within the directorate are more data comprises the Land Register, legislation made under them. appropriate to the demands of the the Bankruptcy and Land Charges In carrying out those specific organisation. A Direction of Travel registers and the Agricultural operational functions the Chief review was undertaken by CIPFA in Credits Act registers. Executive is not subject to any January 2017 which demonstrated ministerial control or direction, that we have made significant Already benchmarked as in although is subject to supervision progress and are now assessed as the upper quartile, subsequent by the court through the judicial being in the top quartile of around external assessment using CDCAT review jurisdiction. 50 organisations assessed by has confirmed that significant CIPFA. progress has been made as a Notwithstanding that contextual result of the Cyber Security Project framework, HM Land Registry Procurement assurance due to be completed in June 2017. also operates within the I am assured by the Chief The newly created Cyber Panel delegations framework as Procurement Officer, regarding will take responsibility for the defined by the Cabinet Office specific procurements, that holistic oversight of our continuing for arm’s-length bodies and the procurement activities are initiatives to improve against the specific delegations authorised conducted in line with Cabinet escalating requirements of this by officials at BEIS. There is also Office and Treasury guidance external assessment process, and a requirement to work with the and that senior managers have maintain them as we digitise our Government Digital Service to complied with these and HM Land services and products. The Cyber ensure that product releases Registry-specific procurement Panel will also oversee our plans conform to standards in terms guidelines. to improve our understanding of security, effectiveness and of cyber threats within all levels consistency. Before products In December 2015 HM Land of our procedures, processes are released as betas, HM Land Registry signed a five-year and across our work through Registry must submit products contract with a new supplier to our permanent and temporary and comply with the conditions deliver our scanning service. staff, contractors, suppliers and specified by the Government Initially there were significant partners so that we can ensure Digital Service. issues with the supplier’s account is taken of the cyber performance and key deliverables threat landscape across all levels were not being met. However we and types of decision-making. worked with them and supported This will include investment them so their performance in tailored cyber training and improved over a few months. education programmes in addition The contract is now being to the use of central government delivered. Robust contract guidance, educational resources management steps are in place to and networks and internal closely monitor performance. assessment activities in between our formal external assessments. We have already developed an in-house capability to undertake those assessments.

76 Accountability report 77

Graham Farrant Internal Audit and opinion Internal and Audit of opinion theThe Head annual of Internal Audit is: “Based on the work completed by Internal to able I am Audit during 2016/17, provide reasonable assurance that the HM Land Registry framework of risk, control governance and enabledhas the satisfactory achievement of its business objectives, that and key risks are generally being effectively managed”. Accounting OfficerAccounting Chief Executive Chief and Land Registrar July 2017 11

Theoperational visits provide vital feedback on the backlog position speedand of service outcomes. reportingIn performance against Business the original 2013-18 Strategy targets, now is it clear that we will meet the majority of five-year our targets, or but the donehave so already, overall efficiency target of 60% improvement will not be met. I regularly visit the operational offices Head Office and groups, theas do all other members of the EXB, we and receive feedback on organisational performance and other issues of concern to staff our from levels colleagues all at of the organisation. I also meet with a range of external stakeholders through planned visits, regular meetings formaland stakeholder groups.toengagement understand their concerns and operational context. Our performance likely is to represent efficiency a 45% improvement which is, itself, in a efficiencyhuge gain. In additionIn to the monthly financial reports from my Director Business of and Finance Services I receive information on operational performance through a performance which hub, is compiled from wider performance data received reviewed and by the Performance Panel before its monthlysubmission to the EXB. I also receive update papers and presentations from management teams to my EXB. me and Performance reporting Remuneration and staff report Policy for senior civil Both base pay and non- Further information about servants consolidated performance the work of the Civil Service related awards are dependent on Commission can be found at The remuneration of senior civil performance, which is assessed www.civilservicecommission.org. servants (SCS) is set by the Prime through an annual appraisal uk Minister following independent system for senior civil servants, advice from the Senior Salaries more details of which can be Review Body. LRB Chair found at https://www.gov.uk/ Michael Mire was appointed as government/publications/ In reaching its recommendations, LRB Chair on 8 August 2016, for a senior-civil-service-performance- the Review Body has regard to: period of three years. Tim Franklin management. acted as Interim LRB Chair from — the need to recruit, retain and 1 April 2016 until Michael Mire motivate suitably able and Pension liabilities took up his appointment. qualified people to exercise Details of the treatment of pension their different responsibilities; liabilities are available in note 1.7 Assistant Chief Executive — regional/local variations in and 4.4 to the accounts and in the Craig Lester’s appointment as labour markets and their Remuneration and staff report. Assistant Chief Executive ended effects on the recruitment and on 31 October 2016. retention of staff; Policy for other civil — Government policies for servants Non-executive members Leo Geddes’ appointment ended improving the public services Pay for HM Land Registry on 30 September 2016. including the requirement employees who are not in SCS Claire Wren was appointed on on departments to meet the grades is determined each 16 January 2017. She represents output targets for the delivery year following negotiation and the interests of UK Government of departmental services; consultation between HM Land Registry and the unions, and Investments (UKGI) and does not — the funds available to is subject to approval by the receive any remuneration from departments as set out in the Secretary of State, taking into HM Land Registry. In the interim, Government’s departmental account guidance issued by HM between appointments, UKGI sent expenditure limits; and Treasury. a representative to LRB meetings — the Government’s inflation to ensure their interests were target. Service contracts represented. The Constitutional Reform and The Review Body takes account Governance Act 2010 requires Civil of the evidence it receives about Service appointments to be made wider economic considerations on merit on the basis of fair and and the affordability of its open competition. recommendations. The Recruitment Principles The salary of the Chief Executive published by the Civil Service and Chief Land Registrar is set Commission specify the by BEIS. The Remuneration circumstances when appointments Committee, acting on the may be made otherwise. authority of the LRB, considers pay recommendations provided Unless otherwise specified, all by line managers and decides the the directors covered by this distribution of performance pay report hold appointments that are in the annual pay review for HM open-ended and are subject to Land Registry senior civil servants, a notice period of three months. in accordance with Cabinet Office Early termination for the directors guidance. on open-ended service contracts, other than for misconduct, would result in the individual receiving compensation as set out in the Civil Service Compensation Scheme.

78 Accountability report 79

– – – – – 6 3 1 11 10 13 14 14 13

2015/16

– – – – – 2 1 10 12 13 10 12 12 12

2016/17

512 512

£’000

2015/16

834 834 £’000 2016/17 1

Of which: Of which existing: between March April 1 31 2017 and 2016 with significant financial responsibility” This figure during the financial year. should include both off-payroll on-payroll and engagements Individuals who been have deemed “board members, senior officials and/or, Off-payroll engagements of board members and/or senior officials with significant financial responsibility – assurance not has been received been– have terminated as a result of assurance not being received – assurance been has received Existing engagements as of March 31 2017 Cost of consultancy Total – for less than time one at year of reporting months duration, in between 1 April and 2016 for more than £220 that per and last day March31 2017, for longer than six months New engagements, or those that reached six months duration, in between 1 April 2016 and March 31 2017 to request assurance relation in to income tax National and Insurance obligations – for which assurance been has requested – of which include contractual clauses giving the department the right Off-payroll engagements, or those that reached six – for between three four years and time at of reporting – for four or more years time at of reporting – for between two one and years time at of reporting – for between two three and years time at of reporting Off-payroll engagements of board members and/or senior officials with significant financial responsibility during the financial year Expenditure on consultancy 31 March 2017, for more than March31 2017, £220 that per and last day for longer than six months. Off-payroll disclosure Off-payroll Off-payroll engagements as at Salary and performance pay 2016/17 – executive directors1

Salary Performance pay Benefits in kind Pension Total benefits2 £’000 £’000 To nearest £100 £ £’000 Graham Farrant 190 – 195 – – – 190 –195 Chief Executive and Chief Land Registrar Craig Lester 3 45 – 50 – – 43,000 90 – 95 Assistant Chief Executive Annual equivalent (90 – 95) – – – (90 – 95) John Peaden 95 – 100 10 – 15 – 33,000 140 – 145 Director of Operations Alasdair Lewis 95 – 100 – – 21,000 115 – 120 Director of Legal Services and Deputy Chief Land Registrar Catherine Vaughan 125 – 130 10 – 15 – 49,000 185 – 190 Director of Finance and Business Services Caroline Anderson 90 – 95 5 – 10 – 36,000 135 – 140 Director of Human Resources and Organisation & Employee Development John Abbott 115 – 120 – – 64,000 180 – 185 Director of Digital Services Mike Westcott Rudd4 80 – 85 – – 11,000 90 – 95 Board Legal Adviser

1 Audited. 2 The value of pension benefits accrued during the year is calculated as (the real increase in pension multiplied by 20) plus (the real increase in any lump sum) less (the contributions made by the individual). The real increases exclude increases due to inflation or any increase or decreases due to a transfer of pension rights. 3 Craig Lester’s appointment ended on 31 October 2016. 4 Mike Westcott Rudd was appointed as Board Legal Adviser on 1 April 2016. 5 None of the directors paid into a stakeholder pension.

80 Accountability report 81 45 – 50 1 35 – 40 35 – 40 60 – 65 (80 – 85) (85 – 90) 185 –190 (95 – 100) 170 – 175 165 – 170 115 – 120115 180 – 185 120 – 125 125 – 130 (105 – 110) (115 – 120)(115 (190 – 195) (100 – 105) (240 – 245) Total £’000 5 –20 – – – – – – – – – – – – 2 47,000 27,000 49,000 2 2 7 30,000 30,000 36,000 N stakeholder pension.

Pension Pension benefits £

9,000 9,000 2,000 11. one of the directors paid into a – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 100 Benefits in kind To nearestTo £100 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 0 – 5 0 – 5 10 – 1510 10 – 1510 Performance pay £’000 J J M P J J Chief ExecutiveChief Land Chief and Registrar on May 31 2015. Director of Operations from 1 June 2015. Director of Operations on May 31 2015. Director of Strategy on 30 April 2015. Digital Services from 25 January 2016. Director of Digital Services on 24 January 2016.

5. ohn Peaden stood down as Interim 6. ohn Peaden resumed his position as 7. 8. aggie stood Telfer down as Acting 9. aul Dowse stood down as Acting 10. ohn Abbott was appointed Director of on Parry stood down as Interim

0 5 – 1 10 – 1510 75 – 8075 80 – 85 1 20 – 25 20 – 25 90 – 95 (80 - 85) (85 – 90) 95 – 100 (95 – 100) 16 180 – 185 120 – 125 ( (105 – 110) (115 – 120)(115 (190 – 195) (100 – 105) (240 – 245) Salary £’000

part year) 5 –20 0 – 165

3

7 6 5 1 9 4

8

10 G C T Executive and Chief Land Registrar from 1 June 2015. Chief Executive from January 11 2016 for a period of 12 months. during the year is calculated as (the real increase multiplied 20) pension by in plus (the real increase in any lump sum) less (the contributions made by the individual). The increases real exclude increases due to inflation or any increase or decreases due to a transfer rights. pension of Audited.

Annual equivalent Catherine Vaughan Director of Finance and Business Services Annual equivalent Acting Director of Operations Rowland Coombs Director Information of Systems Paul Dowse Annual equivalent Director Digital of Services Acting Director of Strategy of Director Acting Director of Human Resources and Organisation & Employee Development Maggie Telfer Maggie John Peaden Annual equivalent Interim Executive Chief and Chief Land Registrar Craig Lester Assistant Executive Chief Graham Farrant ExecutiveChief Chief and Land Registrar Jon Parry Annual equivalent Annual equivalent Director of Operations John Abbott Annual equivalent Annual equivalent John Peaden Caroline Anderson Alasdair Lewis Director of Legal Services and Deputy Land Chief Registrar Annual equivalent Interim Director of Digital Services 4. raig Lester was appointed Assistant 3. raham Farrant was appointed as Chief 1. 2. he value of pension benefits accrued Salary and performance pay 2015/16 – executive directors Salary – non-executive members1

2016/17 2015/16 £’000 £’000 Mark Boyle2 – 60 – 65 Non-Executive Chair Michael Mire3 35 – 40 Non-Executive Chair Tim Franklin 30 – 35 20 – 25 Non-Executive Chair4 Non-Executive Member5 Catrina Holme 20 – 25 20 – 25 Non-Executive Member Leo Geddes6 – – Non-Executive Member Claire Wren7 – – Non-Executive Member Gerard Connell 20 – 25 20 – 25 Non-Executive Member

1 Audited. 2 Mark Boyle’s appointment as Non- Executive Chair ended on 31 March 2016. 3 Michael Mire was appointed as Non- Executive Chair on 8 August 2016. 4 Tim Franklin acted as Non-Executive Chair from 1 April 2016 until Michael Mire took up his appointment. 5 Tim Franklin resumed his appointment as Non-Executive Member and Senior Independent Director on 8 August 2016. 6 Leo Geddes’ appointment ended on 30 September 2016. 7 Claire Wren’s appointment started on 16 January 2017. She is a full-time employee of the UKGI; she receives no additional remuneration from HM Land Registry in relation to her role as a Non-Executive Member.

Salary Benefits in kind ‘Salary’ includes gross salary, The monetary value of benefits in reserved rights to London kind covers any benefits provided weighting or London allowances, by HM Land Registry and treated recruitment and retention by HMRC as a taxable emolument allowances and any other allowance to the extent that it is Performance awards subject to UK taxation. The tables Awards are based on performance on pages 80 to 81 are based on levels attained and are made as accrued payments made by part of the performance review HM Land Registry and thus process. The awards reported recorded in these accounts. relate to the performance in the The monetary value of benefits in year in which they were paid to the kind covers any benefits provided individual. Therefore the awards by Land Registry and treated reported in 2016/17 relate to by HM Revenue & Customs as a performance in 2015/16 and the taxable emolument. comparative awards reported for 2015/16 relate to performance in 2014/15.

82 Accountability report 83 – 11 24 22 17 27 33 20 Real increaseReal in CETV after adjustment for inflation andchanges in investment factors

£’000

48 66 33 –

681 847 606 1,079 £’000 2016 82 96 60 – 696 639 907 1,161 Cash equivalent transfer value (CETV) at 31 March £’000 2017 – – – – 90 – 95 95 – 100 150 – 155 120 – 125 £’000 Lump sum

– 5 – 10 5 – 10 5 – 10 30 – 35 50 – 55 40 – 45 35 – 40 Total accrued at March 2017 £’000 Pension – – – – 0 – 2 5 2.5 – 5.0 2.5 – 5.0 .5 £’000 .0 –7.5 Lump sum – 0 – 2 0 – 2 0 – 2 0 – 2 0 – 2 2.5 – 5.0 2.5 – 5.0 1

.5 .5 Real increase pension Real in 60 at sum lump and £’000 .5 .5 .5

Pension

2

3 N G C pension. covered by the Civil Service pension arrangements the during reporting year. Chief Executive ended on October 31 2016. Audited.

Mike Westcott Rudd Adviser Legal Board Director of Digital Services John Abbott Caroline Anderson Director of Human and Resources Organisation & Employee Development Chief ExecutiveChief and Chief Land Registrar Catherine Vaughan Director of Finance and Business Services Director of of Director Operations John Peaden Alasdair Lewis Legal of Director Services Deputy and Chief Land Registrar Craig Lester Assistant Chief Executive Graham Farrant 4. o director paid into astakeholder 3. raig Lester’s appointment as Assistant 1. 2. raham Farrant chose not to be Pension benefits Civil Service pensions opt for either the appropriate the member) into an approved Pension benefits are provided defined benefit arrangement or stakeholder pension product through the Civil Service pension a ‘money purchase’ stakeholder chosen by the employee from a arrangements. From 1 April 2015 pension with an employer panel of providers. The employee a new pension scheme for civil contribution (partnership pension does not have to contribute but servants was introduced – the account). where they do make contributions, Civil Servants and Others Pension the employer will match these up Scheme or Alpha, which provides Employee contributions are to a limit of 3% of pensionable benefits on a career average basis salary-related and range between salary (in addition to the with a normal pension age equal 3% and 8.05% of pensionable employer’s basic contribution). to the member’s State Pension earnings for classic (and members HM Land Registry also contributes Age (or 65 if higher). From that of alpha who were members of a further 0.8% of pensionable date all newly appointed civil classic immediately before joining salary up to 30 September 2015 servants and the majority of those alpha) and between 4.6% and and 0.5% of pensionable salary already in service joined Alpha. 8.05% for members of premium, from 1 October 2015 to cover Prior to that date, civil servants classic plus, nuvos and all other the cost of centrally provided risk participated in the Principal Civil members of alpha. Benefits in benefit cover (death in service and Service Pension Scheme (PCSPS). classic accrue at the rate of 1/80th ill health retirement). The PCSPS has four sections: three of final pensionable earnings for providing benefits on a final salary each year of service. In addition, The accrued pension quoted is the basis (classic, premium and classic a lump sum equivalent to three pension the member is entitled to plus) with a normal pension age of years’ initial pension is payable on receive when they reach pension 60; and one providing benefits on retirement. For premium, benefits age, or immediately on ceasing a whole career basis (nuvos) with accrue at the rate of 1/60th of final to be an active member of the a normal pension age of 65. pensionable earnings for each scheme if they are already at or year of service. Unlike classic, over pension age. Pension age These statutory arrangements there is no automatic lump sum. is 60 for members of classic, are unfunded with the cost of Classic plus is essentially a hybrid premium and classic plus, 65 for benefits met by monies voted by with benefits for service before 1 members of nuvos, and the higher Parliament each year. Pensions October 2002 calculated broadly of 65 or State Pension Age for payable under classic, premium, as per classic and benefits for members of alpha. (The pension classic plus, nuvos and alpha are service from October 2002 worked figures quoted for officials show increased annually in line with out as in premium. In nuvos a pension earnings in PCSPS or Pensions Increase legislation. member builds up a pension alpha – as appropriate. Where Existing members of the PCSPS based on their pensionable the official has benefits in both who were within 10 years of their earnings during their period of the PCSPS and alpha the figure normal pension age on 1 April scheme membership. At the end quoted is the combined value of 2012 remained in the PCSPS after of the scheme year (31 March) their benefits in the two schemes, 1 April 2015. Those who were the member’s earned pension but note that part of that pension between 10 years and 13 years account is credited with 2.3% may be payable from different and 5 months from their normal of their pensionable earnings in ages.) pension age on 1 April 2012 that scheme year and the accrued will switch into alpha sometime pension is up-rated in line with Further details about the Civil between 1 June 2015 and1 Pensions Increase legislation. Service pension arrangements February 2022. All members who Benefits in alpha build up in a can be found at www. switch to alpha have their PCSPS similar way to nuvos, except that civilservicepensionscheme.org.uk benefits ‘banked’, with those the accrual rate is 2.32%. In all with earlier benefits in one of the cases members may opt to give final salary sections of the PCSPS up (commute) pension for a lump having those benefits based sum up to the limits set by the on their final salary when they Finance Act 2004. leave alpha. (The pension figures quoted for officials show pension The partnership pension earned in PCSPS or alpha – as account is a stakeholder pension appropriate. Where the official arrangement. HM Land Registry has benefits in both the PCSPS makes a basic contribution of and alpha the figure quoted is the between 3% and 12.5% up to combined value of their benefits 30 September 2015 and 8% in the two schemes.) Members and 14.75% from 1 October joining from October 2002 may 2015 (depending on the age of

84 Accountability report 85 Real increase CETV in Real This reflectsthe increase in CETV that funded is by the It does not include theemployer. increase accrued in pension due to inflation, contributions paid by the employee (including the value of benefits any transferred fromanother pension scheme or arrangement) uses and common market valuationfactors for the start end of the and period. TheCETV figures include the value of pension any benefit in another scheme or arrangement that the transferred individual has to the Civil Service pension arrangements. They also include additionalany pension benefit accrued to the member as a result of their buying additional pension benefits their at own cost. CETVs are worked accordance out in with The Occupational Pension Schemes (Transfer Values) (Amendment) Regulations 2008 do notand take of any account actual or potential reduction to benefits resulting from Lifetime Allowance which be may due Tax, when pension benefits are taken. Cash transfer equivalent values A cash equivalent transfer value (CETV) the is actuarially assessed capitalised value of the pension scheme benefits accrued by a member a particular at point in time. The benefits valued are the member’s accrued benefits and contingentany spouse’s pension payable from the scheme. A CETVa payment is by made a pension scheme or arrangement to secure pension benefits in another pension scheme or arrangement when the member leaves a scheme chooses and to transfer the benefits accrued in their former scheme. The pension figures shown relate to the benefits that the individual has accrued as a consequence of their total membership of the pension scheme, not their just service a in senior capacity to which disclosure applies. Reporting of Civil Service and other compensation schemes – exit packages1

Exit package cost Number of compulsory Number of other Total number of exit band redundancies departures agreed packages by cost band 2016/17 2015/16 2016/17 2015/16 2016/17 2015/16 £0–£10,000 – – – 2 – 2 £10,001–£25,000 – – – 2 – 2 £25,001–£50,000 – – – 1 – 1 £50,001–£100,000 – – 2 – 2 – £100,001–£150,000 – – – 1 – 1 £150,001–£200,000 – – – – – – >£200,000 – – – – – – Total number of exit – – 2 6 2 6 packages Total cost – – £154,035 £186,918 £154,035 £186,918

1. Audited. There were no ex-gratia payments Pay multiples1 to directors in 2016/17 (2015/16: Reporting bodies are required to none). disclose the relationship between Compensation for loss of the remuneration of the highest- paid director in their organisation office and the median remuneration of Redundancy and other departure the organisation’s workforce. costs have been paid in accordance with the provisions Total remuneration includes of the Civil Service Compensation salary, non-consolidated Scheme, a statutory scheme made performance-related payments under the Superannuation Act and benefits in kind. It does 1972. Exit costs are accounted for not include employer pension in full in the year of contractual contributions and the cash agreement to depart. Where equivalent transfer value of applicable, the additional costs pensions. of buy-out of reduced pension benefit are met by HM Land Registry and not by the Civil 2016/17 2015/16 Service pension scheme. Ill health Band of highest paid director’s 190 – 195 190 – 195 retirement costs are met by the total remuneration (£’000) pension scheme and are not Median total (£) 25,797 29,624 included in the table. Remuneration ratio 7.5 6.5

1. Audited.

In 2016/17 no employees received Use of the remuneration of an remuneration in excess of the interim member of staff appointed highest paid permanent director. in March 2017 on a short-term Remuneration ranged from basis to provide expertise in a key £190,000 – £195,000 to £15,000 role would distort the remuneration – £20,000 (2015/16: £190,000 – ratio over the longer term, and £195,000 to £15,000 – £20,000). therefore has not been shown above.

86 Accountability report 87 5 6 5 10 277 7.1 5% 2.8% 6.3 9% 18 30 36% 4,328 60% 119 £’000 4,035 4,486 Total 13,733 25,621 140,131 179,485 Total 2015/16

4 1 2 2 165 2,644 4% 3.9% 5.9 6.4 9% 31.3 35% 32 60% Female 387 223 277 £’000 4,312 4,922 4,862 4,148 Others 2016/17 6 4 4 3 112 1,684 Male 109 949 £’000 5,433 6,491 Apprentices

£’000 24,285 13,401 130,386 168,072 Permanent staff

Permanent employees SCS) including (not Apprentices Senior Civil Service – band 1 Senior Civil Service – band 2 Executive directors Non-executive members As March at 31 ofNumber employees (including fixed-term appointments) Employees who report they a disability have Employees from ethnic minorities Permanent full-time equivalents spend as percentage ofTraining salary bill employeesFemale Number ofNumber apprentices days per apprentice Training Employees working part-time Other pension costs staffTotal costs Salaries Social security costs Number ofNumber temporary/contract staff Average sickness days per employee Average of number training days per employee * Some Senior Civil Service employees are also directors and are included in both categories. Staff costs for 2016/17 Staff report Gender analysis at 31 at analysis MarchGender 2017 Staff numbers Average full-time equivalent in year

5000

4000

3000

2000

1000

0 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17

Resourcing Recruitment Health and wellbeing Our recruitment procedures We recruited a total of 584 We have continued to deliver are conducted on the basis of members of staff. initiatives to support employees merit following fair and open and the organisation. Highlights competition in accordance with In support of our core service for 2016/17 include: the Civil Service Commissioners’ standards and to supplement — the availability of an Employee Recruitment Principles, and our substantive workforce a Assistance Programme to are subject to internal and number of short-term fixed- provide employees and external monitoring. All our job term appointments were made, managers with comprehensive opportunities are subject to the allowing our more experienced and effective support 24 hours Guaranteed Interview Scheme staff to focus on more complex a day; which assures that disabled core registration activities. people will progress to the next — cross-HM Land Registry stage of the selection process Off-payroll contractors have promotion and participation if their application meets the also been used to meet short- in the Time to Change, Time minimum criteria. It is our policy term needs in more specialist to Talk mental health day and to ensure that any tests used do areas, and information regarding Mental Health Awareness not discriminate against disabled compliance and disclosures Week; candidates. are included in the off-payroll — delivery of a range of forums disclosure table on page 79. providing line managers See also page 31. with guidance and advice A very small number of on supporting staff dealing voluntary exits have enabled the with mental health issues, organisation to release people bereavement and serious with skills that are no longer illness. required and refresh small specialist areas of the workforce.

88 Accountability report 89 during the year. Day-to-dayduring the year. operation of employment relations managed throughis weekly consultation and engagement meetings between senior departmental and management trade representatives. union During the we year again have seenpositive improvements in HM Land Registry’s engagement scores the in Civil Service People Survey, regularand internal surveys held during the have year shown that these improvements beenhave maintained. We continue to be committed to further improvements in executive an and engagement responsibility has lead for an keyengagement performance indicator action and to plan create environmentan where staff managersand feel valued and connected. Constructive discussion with both at unions departmental localand level, addition in to encouraging staff involvement on other committees (including health wellbeing, and social and sports, diversity charity), and and directors’ visits with question and answer sessions, essential are all ensuringin employees’ our views are heard understood. and P P P H awareness events through departmental health campaigns promoting healthy lifestyle choices. health service, with an associated health and wellbeing website monthly and promotional material on health issues. a cycle to work scheme. providing staff with the opportunity to check blood pressure, body mass index cholesterol.and

Informal six-weekly dialogue between the Chief Executive and trade continued has leads union We meetWe regularly with trade our unions. The Chief Executive and members team of his formally meet representatives the at Departmental Whitley Council meetings twice There a year. are structures for place in local Whitley meetings, are unions and consulted on specific issues. Managers are expected to have regular monthly discussions with individual team members to openly discuss employee performance, ideas for improvements to working practices, wider organisational issues employee any and concerns. Chief Executive director and blogs beenhave issued during the year on a weekly staff basis our and beenhave encouraged to respond to these with the of creating aim open honest and dialogue and exchange of views. Employee involvement continue toWe both engage informally formally and with staff theirand representatives. Capability See page 32. — romotion of key wellness — rovision occupational of an — romotion participation and in — ealth screening sessions promoted through a combination of the following key activities. Ongoing staff wellbeing is Parliamentary accountability and audit report Fees and charges

2016/17 2015/16

Income Total costs Surplus Income Total costs Surplus £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Registration of title 299,591 237,240 62,351 284,196 249,120 35,076 Land Charges and Agricultural 6,267 1,429 4,838 6,193 1,516 4,677 Credits Commercial 5,567 3,326 2,241 4,983 3,548 1,435 311,425 241,995 69,430 295,372 254,184 41,188

Audited. HM Land Registry applied However, due to the demand cost allocation and charging for our services exceeding our requirements as set out in expectations the recommended HM Treasury guidance. rate of return has been exceeded.

Special payments

2016/17 2015/16

Number of cases Value of payment Number of cases Value of payment £’000 £’000 Number of special payments over £300,000 – – – –

Audited.

Graham Farrant Chief Executive and Chief Land Registrar 11 July 2017

90 Accountability report 91 The Certificate and Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General to the Houses of Parliament

I certify that I have audited the financial statements I am required to obtain evidence sufficient to give of HM Land Registry for the year ended 31 March reasonable assurance that the expenditure and 2017 under the Government Trading Funds Act 1973. income recorded in the financial statements have The financial statements comprise: the Statement been applied to the purposes intended by Parliament of Comprehensive Income, Statement of Financial and the financial transactions recorded in the Position, Statement of Cash Flows, Statement of financial statements conform to the authorities which Changes in Reserves and the related notes. These govern them. financial statements have been prepared under the accounting policies set out within them. I have Opinion on regularity also audited the information in the Remuneration In my opinion, in all material respects the expenditure and Staff Report and Parliamentary Accountability and income recorded in the financial statements have disclosures that is described in that report as having been applied to the purposes intended by Parliament been audited. and the financial transactions recorded in the financial statements conform to the authorities which Respective responsibilities of the Chief Land govern them. Registrar and auditor As explained more fully in the Statement of Opinion on financial statements Accounting Officer’s Responsibilities, the Chief Land In my opinion: Registrar as Accounting Officer is responsible for — the financial statements give a true and fair view the preparation of the financial statements and for of the state of HM Land Registry’s affairs as at being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. 31 March 2017 and of its retained surplus for the My responsibility is to audit, certify and report on year then ended; and the financial statements in accordance with the Government Trading Funds Act 1973. I conducted my — the financial statements have been properly audit in accordance with International Standards on prepared in accordance with the Government Auditing (UK and Ireland). Those standards require Trading Funds Act 1973 and HM Treasury me and my staff to comply with the Auditing Practices directions issued thereunder. Board’s Ethical Standards for Auditors. Opinion on other matters Scope of the audit of the financial In my opinion: statements — the parts of the Remuneration and Staff Report An audit involves obtaining evidence about the and Parliamentary Accountability disclosures amounts and disclosures in the financial statements to be audited have been properly prepared in sufficient to give reasonable assurance that accordance with HM Treasury directions made the financial statements are free from material under the Government Trading Funds Act 1973; misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error. This and includes an assessment of: whether the accounting — the information given in the Performance Report policies are appropriate to HM Land Registry’s and Accountability Report for the financial year circumstances and have been consistently applied for which the financial statements are prepared is and adequately disclosed; the reasonableness of consistent with the financial statements. significant accounting estimates made by HM Land Registry; and the overall presentation of the financial statements. In addition I read all the financial and non-financial information in the Annual Report and Accounts to identify material inconsistencies with the audited financial statements and to identify any information that is apparently materially incorrect based on, or materially inconsistent with, the knowledge acquired by me in the course of performing the audit. If I become aware of any apparent material misstatements or inconsistencies I consider the implications for my certificate.

92 Accountability report 93

2017 received from branches not visited by my staff; or returns; or returns; in agreementin with the accounting records and explanations I require for my audit; or withcompliance HM Treasury’s guidance. or returns adequate not for have been my audit Remuneration Staff and Report Parliamentary and Accountability disclosures to be audited are not I h t a t ave not received of the all information and he Governance Statement does not reflect dequate accounting records not have been kept he financial statements the and parts of the Report Matters which I report on exception by Sir Amyas C E Morse matters which I report my opinion: in to you if, statements. National Audit Office London I have no observationsI have to on these make financial I have nothingI have to report respect in of the following SW1W 9SP Comptroller Auditor and General Victoria 157-197 BuckinghamRoad Palace 157-197 13 July — — — — © Adam Radosavljevic/Shutterstock.com 94 Financial statements 95 . (431) (702) £’000 1,774 (7,817) (1,458) (3,469) (2,265) 56,781 41,188 21,053 34,637 13,236 (15,593) (13,584) 2015/16 295,372 (238,591) (4) (425) (682) £’000 2,965 1,336 (1,592) (3,427) 45,740 69,430 64,636 84,466 48,705 (15,036) (18,896) 2016/17 311,425 (226,959) Notes 8.1, 9.1 6 5 2 2 2 3.2 3.3 7

Surplus for the financial year Retained surplus/(loss) for the financial year equipment Restructure reorganisation and costs Local Land Charges revenue costs Dividend payable Finance costsFinance Comprehensive surplus/(loss) for the financial year Loss on disposal of non-current assets Investment income – interest receivable Income – continuing operations Operating surplus Gain/(Loss) on revaluation of property, and plant Cost of service Gross surplus Amortisation depreciation and of e-service systems

Administrative expenses Financial statements Thenotes on pages 99 to 120 are integral an part of these accounts. Statement of comprehensive income for the year ended 31 for March ended the 2017 Statement income year comprehensive of Statement of financial position as at 31 March 2017

2016/17 2015/16

Notes £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Non-current assets Property, plant and equipment 8 53,593 56,675 Investment property 8.4 4,920 6,800 Intangible assets 9 8,607 4,370 Other receivables 11.2 1,341 1,437 Total non-current assets 68,461 69,282 Current assets Inventories 10 4,049 4,745 Trade and other receivables 11.1 9,597 12,791 Cash and cash equivalents 12 489,926 443,871 Total current assets 503,572 461,407 Non-current assets classified as 8.3 6,982 – held for sale Total assets 579,015 530,689 Current liabilities Trade and other payables 13.1 56,016 51,580 Obligations under finance leases 13.1, 14.1 194 284 Short-term provisions 16.1 6,393 8,116 62,603 59,980 Indemnity Fund 16.2 85,100 84,800 Total current liabilities 147,703 144,780 Non-current assets plus net 431,312 385,909 current assets Non-current liabilities Obligations under finance leases 13.2, 14.1 4,736 4,931 Long-term provisions 16.1 4,309 7,416 Total non-current liabilities 9,045 12,347 Net assets 422,267 373,562 Capital and reserves Public Dividend Capital 61,545 61,545 Revaluation reserve 19,200 16,268 Income and expenditure account 341,522 295,749 422,267 373,562

The notes on pages 99 to 120 are an integral part of these accounts.

Graham Farrant Chief Executive and Chief Land Registrar 11 July 2017

96 Financial statements 97 – £’000 7,372 (7,372) 48,705 13,236 360,326 422,267 373,562 Total reservesTotal – 33 £’000 7,389 21,053 45,740 295,749 267,307 341,522 I&E reserve (17) (33) £’000 2,965 (7,817) (7,372) 16,268 31,474 19,200 reserve Revaluation – – – – – £’000 61,545 61,545 61,545 Public Dividend Capital Revaluation of non-current assets Transfer to retainedTransfer earnings Transfer to retainedTransfer earnings Balance March at 31 2017 Balance at 31 MarchBalance 31 at 2015 Revaluation reserve Balance at 31 MarchBalance 31 at 2016 Revaluation reserve Changes reserves in 2016/17 Changes reserves in 2015/16 Comprehensive loss Comprehensive surplus an integralan part of these accounts. Thenotes on pages 99 to 120 are Statementreserves changes of in 31 for March ended the 2017 year Cash flow statement for the year ended 31 March 2017 2016/17 2015/16 Notes £’000 £’000 Net cash inflow from operating activities 19.1 71,066 55,673 Investing activities Purchase of tangible assets (2,595) (4,091) Purchase of intangible assets (8,202) (355) Proceeds on disposal of tangible assets – 9,314 Interest received 1,729 1,618 Net cash inflow from investing activities (9,068) 6,486 Financing activities Dividends paid (14,977) (14,717) Repayments of capital element of obligations under (284) (621) finance leases Interest elements of obligations under finance leases (682) (702) Net cash outflow from financing activities (15,943) (16,040) Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash 19.2 46,055 46,119 equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 19.2 443,871 397,752 Cash and cash equivalents at end of year 12 489,926 443,871

The notes on pages 99 to 120 are an integral part of these accounts.

98 Financial statements 99

E O

which the employee renders the with financial information. The with the internal reporting to pay them the and costs can be terminate theemployment of the responsibility for registering three business main segments the services provides it are and for the provision of the service, for intangible assets IAS under 38. reliably estimated. Termination benefits are recognised when it benefits recognised is the in period which in HM Land related expenditure either is being expensed incurred as or based on the internal group’s reported consistent a manner in provided tothe chief operating recognised once the register has been fully updated following receipt of application. an is an irreversible an is agreement to its employees, rather than when paid is orit payable. Short-term service. Performance payments in whichin the provided is CODM structure, the is and primary way segments are organised around can be demonstrated that there employee benefits are recognised Local Land Charges Land Local employee(s) beforethe schemes’ capitalised meets it if the criteria organisation management and decision The (CODM). maker Registry receives services from Local Land Charges. preparing In Following the passing of the Land Registry been has given HM Land Registry’s operating Infrastructure Act 2015, HM as an expenseas an the in period in are recognised only when there is a legal or constructive obligation and Chiefand Land Registrar. are registration of title, Land commercialand This income. is CODM ofCODM HM Land Registry is Graham Farrant, Chief Executive Charges Agricultural and Credits 1.6 benefitsmployee 1.5 perating segments The cost of providing employee A F E provisions; and provision for indemnity claims. intangibles; early severance other and current assets; Note 8 – impairment of non- N N N

where erroneous information is the carrying amounts of assets that a significant have risk of financial are: year revaluation of property, plant property, assets held for sale, material, inventories to fair value been preparedthe under historical being reported. These amounts resulting payments in being received for services not yet refunds for transactions that are not completed or on transactions provided by customers. based on historical experience intangible assets where and, is recognisedis the in financial whichin the service delivered. is statements of the financial year cost convention modified for the current liabilities. Fees are delivered within the financial year of payment upon application causing a material adjustment to expectations of future events that continually evaluated are and Estimates judgements and are Income from fees charges and Income recognised is net of any under theunder circumstances. and equipment,and investment as determined by the relevant accounting standard. are reported as ‘fees received in advance’ disclosed and within and liabilitiesand within the next are believed to be reasonable and otherand factors, including Certain services require receipt 1.4 ee income 1.3 stimation techniques 1.2 conventionccounting The financial statements have Theestimates judgements and — ote 9–impairment of — –early retirement,ote 16.1 — ote 16.2 –estimated —

B S

Notes to the financial statements with the Government Financial with customers are effective land registrationland there and are legally obliged the under Land the that opinion a going concern to the particular circumstances judged to be the most appropriate from 2018/19; their application but is notbut is effective until periods not expected to a material have been prepared accordance in business going forwards. basis appropriate is as we are have beenhave prepared on a going material relation in to the financial have beenhave applied consistently purposes of giving a true fair and impact on HM Land Registry. in thein sector public context has in dealing with dealing in items considered view been has selected. HM Land interpreted for the sector public sufficient reserves to support the statutory services relating to statements. commencing 1 January 2019. context. Where the FReM permits of the Government Trading Funds ofFunds the Government Trading contained the in FReM follow concern basis. of is Management of HM Land Registry for the Reporting (FReM) Manual 2016/17 Direction given by in HM Treasury IFRS Leases 16 been has issued Registration Act 2002 to provide Registry’s accounting policies International Reporting Financial IFRS Instruments 9 Financial and IFRS 15 Revenue from contracts Standards (IFRS) as adapted or a choice of accounting policy, the accounting policy that been has and complyand with the Accounts accordance with section 4 (6) (a) yet to be interpreted by the FReM. yet to be interpreted by the FReM. Act The 1973. accounting policies 1.1 asis of preparation These accounting standards are These financial statements have These financial statements 1 tatement of accounting policies retirement date or as a result of impairment losses. All other *Following a review of of HM Land an offer to encourage voluntary tangible non-current assets are Registry’s asset replacement redundancy. included at historical cost less policy the asset life for desktop accumulated depreciation and PCs has been updated from three impairment losses. years to five years. This is to 1.7 Pensions reflect the increased reliability and HM Land Registry employees are Assets in the course of therefore life of the assets. civil servants who are entitled to construction are not depreciated. be members of the Principal Civil For other assets the depreciation Non-current assets classified as Service Pension Scheme (PCSPS) charge is calculated so as to held for sale are carried at fair or the Civil Servant and Other allocate the cost or revalued value less costs to sell and are not Pension Scheme (CSOPS)–known amount, less the estimated depreciated. HM Land Registry as ‘alpha’. These are unfunded residual value, of non-current classifies a non-current asset as multi-employer defined benefit assets systematically over their held for sale if its carrying amount schemes, but HM Land Registry is remaining useful lives using the will be recovered principally unable to identify its share of the straight-line method. through a sales transaction rather underlying assets and liabilities on than through continuing use. To a reasonable and consistent basis. Other property, plant and qualify the asset must be available HM Land Registry has therefore equipment includes IT and for immediate sale in its present accounted for contributions and office equipment and machinery. condition and the sale must be payments to these schemes HM Land Registry capitalises highly probable. under International Accounting expenditure over £1,000 for Standards (IAS) 19 as if they were an individual asset. Where defined contribution schemes. 1.9 Impairment of non-current appropriate, individual assets Liability for the payment of future assets falling below the minimum value benefits is a charge on the PCSPS Impairment reviews are for capitalisation are grouped. or alpha scheme. undertaken at each year end and It is HM Land Registry’s policy if there are indications that the not to capitalise expenditure on asset has suffered an impairment 1.8 Property, plant and fixtures and fittings, principally loss a charge is reflected in the equipment office furniture, as they are not statement of comprehensive Freehold and leasehold land considered material. income in the year in which it and buildings are professionally occurs. If the asset is carried at a valued by external, independent Asset lives are reviewed at the end revalued amount, the impairment property valuers having of each financial year. loss is treated as a revaluation appropriate recognised decrease, to the extent of the professional qualifications and The following asset depreciation revaluation reserve that relates recent experience in the location rates are used. to the asset, with any excess in and category of the properties the statement of comprehensive being valued. Cushman & Freehold land nil income. If any such indication Wakefield, RICS registered valuers, Freehold buildings Estimated exists the recoverable amount carried out a desktop valuation in useful life of the asset is estimated in order February 2017. Leasehold buildings Period to determine the extent of the HM Land Registry is required of the impairment loss. The recoverable by the FReM to disclose non- lease or amount is the higher of fair value current assets in the statement of estimated less costs to sell and value in use. financial position at fair value. For useful life assets in use the FReM requires 1.10 Intangible assets valuation at existing use as an Telecommunications Five years Software licences asset’s fair value, rather than equipment Separately acquired intangible market value required by IFRS 13. Office equipment Five years assets are shown at historical Details of FReM adaptations which cost. The costs incurred to acquire continue to apply for 2016/17 and bring these assets to use can be found on GOV.UK (search Computers: are capitalised. These include for ‘Financial Reporting Manual mainframe Five years contractors’ charges, materials, 2016/17’). PCs Five directly attributable labour and years* directly attributable overhead For short life non-property assets costs. historical cost is used as an Structured cabling Ten years approximation to the fair value Software licences are included of the asset. Freehold land and at cost less accumulated buildings and leasehold buildings Plant and heavy Ten years amortisation. They are amortised are included at revaluation less machinery on a straight line basis at a rate of accumulated depreciation and

100 Financial statements 101 C T Trade Trade receivables

less cannot and be repaid until to pay for goods services and that been have acquired the in their value as reduced nominal they are classified as current to the customer less further fair value. factors which are considered to maturity of the loan. payables are stated their at The value. nominal carrying by appropriate allowances for recorded in administrative receivables deemed is to be an payment within due is one year be relevant. These estimates reviewed on a regular basis. investments of three months or irrecoverable amounts. These impairment provisions are is expectedis one or in year less in completingin the services. The in-progress are derived from suppliers. Accounts payable are cash held with the Government deposit with the National Loans expenses within the statement of comprehensive income. ordinary course of business from classified as current liabilities if or less. If not they are presented deemedto be approximation an of costs expected to be incurred costs associated with work- estimates assumptions and based on historical experience other and Fund depositsFund are short-term Banking Service (GBS), cash on commercial in and bank Fund If collection of amounts receivable accounts. The commercial bank GBSand deposits are immediately funds.available NationalLoans as non-current liabilities. Trade of tradeamount payables is any interestany are and stated at approximation of fair value. assets. and underlyingand assumptions are Cash represents cash-in-hand, 1.14 ash and cash equivalents 1.15 rade payables 1.13 Trade payables are obligationsTrade Trade receivablesTrade do not carry Thecarrying of trade amount The life

These assets

and Businessand

The costof developing

I Inventories

will be amortised over their useful was determined with reference life. lower of cost net realisable and to the useful lives of other similar the development and building of a the IT systems (HM Land Registry to retained earnings (see note 1.8 the information, the and data three systems to deliver for details of valuers). register service these components held by 326 local authorities. Two have beenhave amortised over eight portal, e-security recognised in or loss. When previously classified as property, equipment sold, is and plant any related included amount thein revaluation reserve transferred is proceeds from disposal the and based on the fee that charged is investment property that was value. Costvalue. includes internal costs intangible assets on the statement itself which needs to be cleansed, identified, a database to hold e-security and Business Local Land Charges Land Local Work-in-progress stated is the at of financial position. e-services. digitalised migrated and to this database. Under IAS 38, costs computerised register to hold the development costs been have carrying of the amount item) is on disposal (calculated as the difference between the net HM Land Registry portal, of staff directly and attributable overheads preparing in completion of registration for the Net realisable value customer. is HM Land Registry commenced has Local Land Charges data currently useful life of the systems. Investment property measured is HM Land Registry developed attributable to these two activities are treated Intangible as an asset, on of commencement and the assets use in HM in Land Registry. at fair Any value. at or loss gain Gateway years, whichwas the expected Gateway) been have capitalised as 1.12 1.11 nvestment property Five years Five years* to the software product the software product will the software product; product are and available; reliably measured. so that will it be for available complete the software product complete the development complete the software product during its development can be generate probable future economic benefit; use; and useand or sell it; and otherand resources to toand use or sell the software it is technically is it feasible to t a t i m

Mainframe PCs the direct costs of in-house these criteria are recognised as an Software development costs product include the software staff effort) can be capitalised. controlled by HM Land Registry directly attributable to the design testing and of identifiable expenditure incurred on developing new IT infrastructure off as incurred. expense as incurred. Development costs previously recognised as an expense are not recognised as an overheads. Other development expenditures that does not meet development employee costs and capitalised as part of the software Development costs thatare Directly attributable costs that are In accordanceIn with IAS 38, are recognised as intangible assets when the following criteria are met: and unique software unique and products asset a subsequent in period. an appropriatean portion of relevant (covering third(covering party costs and All research expenditure written is — he expenditure attributable — dequate technical, financial — t can be demonstrated how — here ability an is touse or sell — intendsanagement to — 1.16 Provisions claims incurred but not reported. 1.20 VAT HM Land Registry provides for The estimated cost of claims HM Land Registry accounts for legal and constructive obligations includes expenses incurred in VAT on its statutory activities that are of uncertain timing settling these claims. under HM Treasury’s Taxing or amount at the statement of and Contracting Out of Services financial position date, on the The carrying amount of the Directions. For non-statutory basis of management’s best Indemnity Fund is derived from activity, which is business activity, estimate of the expenditure critical judgements, estimates VAT is charged and recovered required to settle the obligation Registry, supported by its according to commercial VAT rules. at the statement of financial independent actuaries Lane, Irrecoverable VAT is charged to position date. If the effect of Clark & Peacock LLP. the relevant expenditure category discounting is material, provisions or included in the capitalised are discounted to the expected After the accounting date, a purchase costs of non-current present value of their future cash further review of claims received assets. Where output tax is flows using a risk-free discount by HM Land Registry (up to charged or input tax is recoverable rate. Where appropriate this the date the Accounting Officer the amounts are stated net of VAT. is supported by independent approves the Annual Report professional advice. Provisions and Accounts) is made to see 1.21 Treasury dividend are charged to the statement if the indemnity fund is still HM Land Registry is required of comprehensive income and appropriately valued. Provided to pay the Treasury an annual recorded as liabilities in the in these accounts are the likely dividend being 3.5% of the statement of financial position. settlement values of current average capital employed during (Further details, including and future claims against the the financial year plus the latest sensitivities, are given in note 16.) Indemnity Fund. Further details of inflation estimate for the year, the Indemnity Fund are shown in provided by ONS (see note 21). note 16.2 of this report. 1.17 Indemnity Fund HM Land Registry considers it Schedule 8 to the Land sufficient to calculate this figure Registration Act 2002 requires 1.18 Contingent liabilities using an annual average. There is HM Land Registry to indemnify Where appropriate, liabilities no material impact of calculating third parties against loss caused that have only a possible chance this figure using an alternative by mistakes in the register, of crystallising and do not meet method, eg monthly average. mistakes in search results and the provisions criteria have been loss of documents by HM Land classified as contingent liabilities. 1.22 Prior period re-statements Registry. Most of HM Land This includes, but is not limited Under IAS 8 Accounting policies Registry’s indemnity claims to, claims for losses arising from changes in accounting estimates arise as a result of mistakes in errors, or fraud in relation to and errors, adjustments to prior the register, and some of these HM Land Registry’s statutory periods are required for changes mistakes are the result of forgery responsibility as insurer of titles in to accounting policies or to correct of documents such as charges. England and Wales (see note 18.1). prior period errors, arising from Indeed fraud/forgery usually omissions, or misstatements. accounts for the largest share of 1.19 Finance leases indemnity payments, and this year Where HM Land Registry retains There have been no prior period is no exception. Under Schedule all the risks and rewards of re-statements in 2016/17. 8 to the Act, HM Land Registry ownership of an asset subject to has statutory rights to recover a lease, the lease is treated as a these payments from third parties, finance lease. Future instalments where it is the case that third payable under finance leases, net parties are at fault, either wholly of finance charges, are included in or partly, for the loss. liabilities with the corresponding asset values recorded in non- As at the current accounting current assets and depreciated date, future claim payments over the shorter of their estimated are uncertain in timing and useful lives or their lease terms. amount. The Indemnity Fund is Lease payments are apportioned established on the basis of the between the finance element, best estimate of the expenditure which is charged to the statement required to settle the obligation. of comprehensive income as The Indemnity Fund is determined interest, and the capital element, after considering actuarial which reduces the outstanding estimates of the cost of claims obligation for future instalments. reported but not settled, as well as

102 Financial statements 103 To £’000 41,188 (15,593) 2015/16 295,372 (238,591) tal (332) 1,435 4,983 £’000 (3,216) income Non- Commercial statutory (33) 6,193 4,677 £’000 (1,483) the income from statutory fees surplus for each of thebusiness segments. The cost of service costof service the and net Detailed the in table below is and commercialand charges, the administrativeand expenses are allocated apportioned and on an appropriate basis for the service. Land Charges and Credits Agricultural £’000 35,076 (15,228) 284,196 (233,892) Statutory Registration of title of

Total £’000 69,430 (15,036) 2016/17 311,425 (226,959)

(343) 2,241 5,567 £’000 (2,983) income Non- Commercial statutory which shown is separately as a two servicesthis and reflected is business segment. made under the under made Agricultural purposes, HM Land Registry in thisin segmental analysis. combines delivery ofthese latter HM Land Registry also provides a range of commercial services Credits Act 1928. For operational (31) 6,267 £’000 4,838 (1,398) Land Charges and Credits Agricultural £’000 62,351 (14,662) 299,591 (222,578) Statutory Registration of titleof B

Income Operating surplus Cost of serviceCost of Administrative expenses lower levels of deferred income. the continuedbuoyancy the in title increased has by £27.2m title; registration of Land Charges housing market significant and baseline forecast (£0.8m) to due higher thanhigher expected. income from government infrastructure projects. is due to due is a combination of higher toincome due increased volumes service. statutory services carried out by segments reporting requires commercial income of £2.2m is compared with This the prior year. expenditure by principal business Local Land Charges revenue costs Local Land Charges will become HM Land Registry runs a live Revenues were than the higher HM Land Registry: registration of International Reporting Financial Standard8 (IFRS 8) – Operating are currently shown Note in 3.3. operatingan segment once and registrationand of mortgages activities. analysis of and income (in with line original budget) and 2 usinesssegments The surplus for the on year Thesurplus for registration of There are three separate areas for 3 Operating surplus

3.1 Operating surplus is stated after charging

2016/17 2015/16

£’000 £’000 Staff costs (see note 4.1) 179,485 168,173

Provision for indemnity costs (see note 16.2) 300 11,200

IT services 14,460 14,901

Hire of machinery 4,948 5,302

Auditor’s remuneration – audit fee 65 65

Depreciation of tangible non-current assets – owned 4,048 4,682

Depreciation of tangible non-current assets – leased 299 547

Amortisation of intangible assets 349 338

Impairment in value of non-current assets (584) 6,466

Charge for operating leases – buildings 1,021 1,361

Miscellaneous income (2,708) (2,842)

3.2 Restructure and reorganisation costs

2016/17 2015/16 Early Early ATP1 Total Early Early ATP Total retirement severance retirement severance

£’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Costs incurred in 270 154 1 425 282 – 1,176 1,458 year

270 154 1 425 282 – 1,176 1,458

1 Accelerated Transformation Programme.

3.3 Local Land Charges

2016/17 2015/16 £’000 £’000 Revenue costs incurred in year 1,592 2,265 1,592 2,265

The Infrastructure Act 2015 passed to HM Land Registry the responsibility for maintaining a register of Local Land Charges and we are in the process of developing this statutory service as a new business segment. This will be shown as a separate segment when HM Land Registry runs Local Land Charges as a live service. Revenue costs related to the development of this service are recorded separately and shown in the table above. Capital costs are shown in Note 9 under Assets under development.

104 Financial statements 105 8 Total Total 230 362 9,657 £’000 3,435 4,035 2015/16 24,467 2015/16 168,173 134,049 8 1 53 26 18 374 151 Others 8,165 Others £’000 7,640 – – – 99 99 424 169 2,711 2,118 £’000 Apprentices Apprentices liabilities the in amounted year to to the PCSPS to cover the cost the statement of financial position that date were not material. the on year ill-health grounds. The total additional accrued pension found the in Remuneration and pensionable pay were payable note 1.7 on page 100. note 1.7 partnership pension providers at pension arrangements can be sum benefitssum on death service in staff report on pages 78 to 89 and contributions of £4,358, 0.5% of of the future provision of lump healthor ill retirement of these employees (2015/16: £3,534). date or contributions pre-paid at In addition,In HM Land Registry Further information relating to Six individuals retired early during £13,875 (2015/16: £39,830). Any contributions to due the

7 staff staff 222 344 9,337 £’000 3,310 3,883 23,669 157,297 124,291 Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent 7 Total Total 275 420 £’000 3,578 4,280 25,621 13,733 2016/17 2016/17 179,485 140,131 – 83 31 12 223 387 126 £’000 4,922 4,312 Others Others to 30 September 2015 from and the member retires not and the the cost of the benefits accruing 8% to 14.75% of pensionable 8% to 14.75% providers (2015/16: £146,842). related range and from 3% to partnership pension account, a benefits paid during this period to reviews employer contributions stakeholder pension with an of £181,344 were paid to one or more of the panel of three earnings from 1 October 2015. employee contributions to up employer contribution. existing pensioners. during 2016/17 to be paid when during 2016/17 contribution rates are set to meet Employer contributions are age- HM Land Registry contributions HM Land Registry also match Employees can opt to open a usually everyusually four years following appointed stakeholder pension a full scheme valuation. The 3% of pensionable earnings. 12.5% of pensionable earnings up 6 4 – 949 109 256 266 £’000 6,491 5,433

Apprentices

Apprentices

7 staff staff 257 385 3,239 3,888 £’000

24,285 13,401 168,072 130,386 Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Thesalary pension and S Pensions S E

Senior Salaries Social security Other pension Operational IT management Administration costs Total staff costs costs

was as follows. up made rates the in range 20% to 24.5% payable to the PCSPS CSOPS and resource accounts of the Cabinet by HM Land Registry during the year pages 78 to 89. valued the scheme March 31 as at its share of the underlying assets salary bands. The scheme actuary of pensionable earnings, based on contributions were of £25.7m employed (full-time equivalent) entitlements of the Chief Executive defined benefit schemes but HM For 2016/17, employers’ For 2016/17, Registry are included the in Remuneration staff and report on Land Registry to unable is identify and liabilities.and The scheme actuary Scheme (PCSPS) the and Civil Servant Other and Pension Scheme (CSOPS)–known as ‘alpha’ and theand directors of HM Land are unfunded multi-employer Office: Civil Superannuation. (2015/16: one at of four £24.4m) 2012. You can find details2012. the in You 4 mployee information Average of number persons 4.2 taff numbers 4.4 4.3 4.1 taff costs The Principal Civil Service Pension 5 Investment income 2016/17 2015/16 £’000 £’000 Interest on bank deposits 1,336 1,774

6 Finance costs 2016/17 2015/16 £’000 £’000 Interest on obligations under finance leases 682 702

7 Dividend payable

2016/17 2015/16 £’000 £’000 Dividend payable 18,896 13,584

In March 2017 an interim payment of £11.9m was made in respect of the ordinary dividend.

See note 1.21 on page 102 for the accounting policy relating to dividend payments.

106 Financial statements 107 5 56 (91) (173) (428) (424) (949) (664) 5,296 2,664 1,889 £’000 Total (2,295) 53,593 86,875 90,859 144,452 143,550 – – – – – – – – – – – 904 197 4,413 4,413 3,312 3,509 £’000 Other plant and equipment 9 5 – – – – – 841 (428) (424) 6,449 2,896 2,200 £’000 64,617 62,140 68,444 71,066 IT-related IT-related assets – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 464 468 (932) £’000 Plant and equipment and Plant Assets under construction

– – – – – – – (50) 713 480 (475) (139) 7,010 5,453 5,215 £’000 12,172 12,463 Leasehold Buildings

– – – – – 56 (34) (474) 1,930 1,490 £’000 (1,745) (1,314) 47,805 17,280 30,525 48,968 16,208 Buildings

– – – – – – – – – – – – 170 (550) £’000 8,705 8,705 9,085 Property Freehold Land

C P

Disposals Reclassification assets of Impairment Revaluation in year Provided during the year Reclassification assets of Disposals impairment depreciation and Current cost revaluation Carrying amount at 31 March 2017 At 31 March 2017 Assets brought into use At 1 April 2016 Additions At 1 April 2016 At 31 March 2017 Accumulated Tfr to asset held for sale Tfr to asset held for sale 8.1 ost or valuation 8 roperty,plant and equipment 8.2 Cost or valuation

Plant and Property equipment Freehold Leasehold Other Assets under IT-related plant and Total construction assets Land Buildings Buildings equipment £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 At 1 April 2015 13,811 56,342 25,643 – 65,514 4,412 165,722

Additions – – – 770 4,223 22 5,015

Assets brought into use – – – (302) 302 – –

Revaluation in year (3,666) 128 (310) – – – (3,848)

Reclassification of assets (335) (5,665) (800) – (1) (21) (6,822)

Impairment (725) (1,837) (2,902) – – – (5,464)

Disposals – – (9,459) – (1,594) – (11,053)

At 31 March 2016 9,085 48,968 12,172 468 68,444 4,413 143,550

Accumulated depreciation and impairment

At 1 April 2015 – 15,235 7,665 – 59,442 3,118 85,460

Provided during the year – 1,497 910 – 3,861 215 6,483

Current cost revaluation – (524) (686) – – – (1,210)

Reclassification of assets – – – – (1) (21) (22)

Disposals – – (2,674) – (1,162) – (3,836)

At 31 March 2016 – 16,208 5,215 – 62,140 3,312 86,874

Carrying amount at 31 March 2016 9,085 32,760 6,957 468 6,304 1,101 56,675

See note 1.8 on page 100 for details of the property, plant and equipment accounting policy.

See note 1.9 on page 100 for details of the impairment accounting policy.

See note 8.4 for details of investment property.

The carrying amount of land and buildings at market value is £38.3m.

The net amount of finance leases at the end of the year was £0.0m (2015/16: £0.1m). In the year an impairment of £0.1m was charged to these finance lease assets.

108 Financial statements 109 for sale represents a closure of an be transferred to the Homes & housing redevelopment.Under operating segment. IFRS 8, none of these assets held Communities Agency for potential – – – – – – £’000 £’000 2015/16

6,800 6,800 2015/16 – 3,629 6,982 2,351

6,800 4,920 1,002 £ £ 2016/17 ’000 ’000 2016/17

(1,880)

taking expected any into account that are not based on observable they are valued by reference to to alternative an location the in fair value hierarchy, becausefair value hierarchy, market price the is market rent measured based upon active market prices adjusted where necessary for difference any in nature, location or condition of market data. properties Level are all 3 on the requirements are and to due valuation techniques inputs using or anticipated periods of non- occupancy by a future tenant. each specific property. The active disclosures during the year. expected to be sold, with HM Land Each Investment property is Level Level 2 and 3 fair value Parkside Court, is Telford, Registry relocating its offices and Chalfontand Drive, southern plot, are surplus to HM Land Registry There were no transfers between Thefair value of investment Telford area. LeicesterTelford Nursery I N

Revaluation Reserve Reversal of Impairment Reclassification of assets At April 1 At 1 April At March 31 At March 31 Transfers fromTransfers non-current assets (Note 8) with current break option points leases included is note in 14.2. leased to third parties either in 8.4 nvestment property 8.3 on-current assets classified as held for sale been transferred from non-current provide the fair value of HM Land recognised professional property was determined by based on comparables. None have ranging from six months to part or whole. The leases have valued. The independent valuers valuers, having appropriate classified as held for sale. of valuers). qualifications recent and experiencethe in location and category of the property being external, independent property eight years.eight One lease an has different non-cancellable periods Parkside Court, Leicester Telford, Nursery Chalfont and Drive, Nottingham, southern plot, have Registry’s investment properties Further information about these Increases are linked to market rent Investment property comprises assets to non-current assets annually (seeannually note 1.8 for details an automatican right of renewal. annual rent reviewannual period, two are five yearly one none. has and a number ofa number properties that are

The fair value of investment 9 Intangible assets

9.1 Cost or valuation

Business Assets under Software E-security Portal Total Gateway development licences £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 At 1 April 2016 9,691 15,967 1,766 – 42,647 70,071 Additions – – – 6,834 1,091 7,925 Assets brought into – – – – 92 92 use Reclassification – – – – (9) 9 Disposals – – – – (162) (162) At 31 March 2017 9,691 15,967 1,766 6,834 43,659 77,917

Amortisation At 1 April 2016 8,478 13,971 1,547 – 41,705 65,701 Charge for the year 1,213 1,996 219 – 349 3,777 Reclassification of – – – – (6) (6) assets Disposals – – – (162) (162) At 31 March 2017 9,691 15,967 1,766 – 41,886 69,310 Carrying amount at – – – 6,834 1,773 8,607 31 March 2017

9.2 Cost or valuation

£’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 At 1 April 2015 9,691 15,967 1,766 – 42,120 69,544 Additions – – – – 543 543 Reclassification – – – – 2 2 Disposals – – – – (18) (18) At 31 March 2016 9,691 15,967 1,766 – 42,647 70,071

Amortisation At 1 April 2015 7,268 11,976 1,326 – 41,384 61,954 Charge for the year 1,210 1,995 221 – 336 3,762 Reclassification of – – – – 3 3 assets Disposals – – – – (18) (18) At 31 March 2016 8,478 13,971 1,547 – 41,705 65,701 Carrying amount at 1,213 1,996 219 – 942 4,370 31 March 2016

See note 1.10 on page 100 for details of the intangible assets accounting policy.

A total of £3.4m of amortisation has been charged to amortisation and depreciation of e-service systems.

The e-security, portal and Business Gateway assets have all been fully depreciated in year.

Assets under development relate to the capitalisation of Local Land Charges costs.

110 Financial statements 111 the National Loans Fund. is limitedis because HM Land of the current economic climate. determined by reference to past default experience. Registry’s balances bank are the in held with main the Government Banking Service and The credit risk funds on liquid for 4,745 4,745 £’000 302 6,285 1,135 2,263 1,437 4,243 £’000 £’000 £’000 2015/16 12,791 46,764 16,681 380,426 443,871 2015/16 2015/16 2015/16

4,049 4,049 £’000 281 9,597 3,555 3,946 £’000 £’000 2,096 1,341 £’000 1,060 2016/17 63,526 16,488

2016/17 2016/17 2016/17 489,926 409,912 this allowance been has from the provision of services and by management basedby management on past receivables spread is and over statement of financial position experience assessment an and doubtful receivables, estimated estimated irrecoverable amounts a large of number customers. are net of allowances for An allowance been has made

The amounts presented the in

Non-current Current C T Inventories

Work-in-progress Prepayments Other receivables Other Government Banking Service National Loans Fund Other receivables Other Prepayments accrued and income Commercial banks and cash-in-hand banksCommercial and Trade receivables Trade the maximum exposure to receivables, which represent receivables deemed is to be an receivables. credit risk relation in to financial on provision of services three is days. No interest charged is on the HM Land Registry’s financial assets. The credit risk primarily is attributable to trade other and assets are balances bank cashand trade and other and approximation of their fair value. 11.2 11.1 The average credit period taken Thecarrying of trade amount other and 12 hand in and bank at ash 11 rade and other receivables 10 13 Trade and other payables

13.1 Current

2016/17 2015/16

£’000 £’000

Trade payables 757 1,701

Taxation and social security 3,462 2,823

Other payables 2,891 2,777

Accruals 19,772 20,115

Net obligations under finance leases – buildings 188 165

Net obligations under finance leases – computer equipment 7 119

Deferred income – fees received in advance 22,234 21,183

Dividend payable 6,899 2,981

56,210 51,864

Trade and other payables and ongoing costs. The average carrying amount of trade principally comprise amounts credit period taken for trade payables is deemed to be an outstanding for trade purchases purchases is five days. The approximation of their fair value.

13.2 Non-current 2016/17 2015/16

£’000 £’000

Net obligations under finance leases – buildings 4,736 4,924

Net obligations under finance leases – computer equipment – 7

4,736 4,931

14 Obligations under leases

14.1 Finance leases

Present value of minimum lease Minimum lease payments payments 2016/17 2015/16 2016/17 2015/16 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Amounts payable under finance leases

Within one year 853 966 194 284

In the second to fifth years inclusive 3,384 3,320 1,037 899

After five years 5,922 6,839 3,699 4,032

10,159 11,125 4,930 5,215

Less future finance charges (5,228) (5,910)

Present value of lease obligations 4,931 5,215 Less amount due for settlement within 12 (194) (284) months (shown under current liabilities) Amount due for settlement after 12 months 4,736 4,931

112 Financial statements 113 leases, which as follows: fall due receivable as follows: operating – – – – 18 (65) 367 349 1,361 1,021 1,021 1,426 £’000 £’000 £’000 2015/16 2015/16 2015/16 – 6 – – 28 353 283 381 £’000 £’000 £’000 1,021 1,021 1,669 1,380 2016/17 2016/17 2016/17

minimum lease paymentsminimum under non-cancellable leases are miscellaneous netted income and now let on commercial terms. values are immaterial, the rental income continues to be treated as off expenditure. Registry’s core business, the and At 31 March 2017 the futureAt March 31 2017 As this not is part of HM Land The investment properties are

Operating leases

leases recognised in theyear Within one year Within one year Income fromIncome tenants Income due from tenants In the second to fifth years inclusive Minimum lease payments operatingMinimum under In the second to fifth years inclusive After five years After five years was included within miscellaneous when the properties were let leases, which as follows: fall due 8.4). the treatment of previous years future lease payments minimum represent rentals payable by HM Land property rental income of £0.37m position date HM Land Registry outstandinghad commitments for investment properties (see note including theincluding Nottingham and income (see This follows note 3.1). sector organisations. Leases lessor as Leases lessee as occupation (MOTO) to other public HM Land Registry leases out Peterborough local offices. During the investment year under non-cancellableunder operating Registry buildings, for and land under memorandumunder of terms of Operating lease payments At the statement of financial 14.2 15 Loans HM Land Registry had no loans during the financial year ending 31 March 2017. 16 Provisions for liabilities and charges

16.1 Early release schemes and other

Total Total Early Early Progression Early retirement Early Early severance Progression Other Other severance pay buy out retirement pay buy out

2016/17 2015/16

£’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000

At 1 April 13,683 – – 1,849 15,532 18,005 2,272 845 361 21,483 Revaluation of 270 – – 200 470 228 – – 1,848 2,076 provision Provision utilised (3,966) – – (607) (4,573) (4,550) (2,242) (831) (86) (7,709) in the year Provision written – – – (727) (727) – (30) (14) (274) (318) back unused

At 31 March 9,987 – – 715 10,702 13,683 – – 1,849 15,532 Included in 6,393 8,116 current liabilities Included in non- 4,309 7,416 current liabilities

10,702 15,532

The early retirement provision IAS 37 Provisions, contingent (ERP) gives retirement benefits liabilities and contingent assets to certain employees. These requires that: “Where the time benefits conform to the rules of value of money is material, the the Principal Civil Service Pension amount of a provision should Scheme (PCSPS). be the present value of the HM Land Registry bears the cost expenditures expected to be of these benefits until the normal required to settle the obligation”. retirement age of the employees The discount factor applied to retired under the scheme. Total the early retirement provision payments in the year amounted to over 10 years is 2%. The impact £4m in 2016/17, of which £4m had of unwinding of the discount in been provided for within the ERP 2016/17 was £0.2m (2015/16: provision in the 2016/17 accounts. £0.2m). The total pension liability up to normal retiring age in respect of each employee is charged to the statement of comprehensive income in the year in which the employee takes early retirement and a provision for future pension payments is created. Pension and related benefit payments to the retired employee until normal retiring age are then charged annually against the provision.

114 Financial statements 115

Total 8,135 9,100 2,100 £’000 (8,135) 84,800 73,600 2015/16

– – – 9,100 £’000 65,200 74,300

IBNR provision

these errors will be discovered corresponding will be. claims and claims made; and made; claims and a h

legal judgements claims and the actuaries project the number the projections are based on future cash claims flows are then known incurred claims and claims but not reported (IBNR). knowledge of the legal team that handles the claims. reports average and claim reported subsequently and settled. inflation. The resulting projected input toinput the actuaries on these sizes, assumptions using about such as the volume of HM Land of registered titles. provide We claims settlementclaims patterns, the expected effects of known any discounted to a net present value consideration of the potential effects of underlying factors Registry provides for these claims itsunder Indemnity both Fund for Registry activity numbers and In estimatingIn the IBNR provision, assumptions, based on the and timingand of future claim theat accounting date using analysis of historical data, claims allowance for recent trends and Claims can take years many to be Treasury prescribedTreasury discount rates. The assumptions used in — t what point the in future — ow much the cost of the 8,135 2,100 8,400 £’000 (8,135) 10,500 Outstanding provision

Total 6,738 2,800 £’000 (6,738) (2,500) 85,100 84,800 2016/17

– – – 2,800 £’000 77,100 74,300

judgements. paid; made; and and made; errors currently within the claims that will ultimately be Register unknown; is t t t t IBNR provision

which based is on existing claims through fraud forgery and or than the Outstanding provision. from frauds perpetrated by third final amounts paid on these be as a result made of errors that alreadyhave been introduced provision are: parties. As a statutory insurer into the register as a result of information, the IBNR provision projecting future payments, the indemnity payments are not is an estimate an is involves as it and day-to-day update activity (either covers potential that claims may claims canclaims significantly add to this of titles Wales, and England in confined to mistakes by made claims receivedclaims but not yet settled claims is uncertain. is claims The main uncertainties within the IBNR HM Land Registry. HM Land uncertainty. administrative error). The main and inherentlyand more uncertain theUnlike Outstanding provision, uncertainties are: Thepresence of large outstanding The IBNR provision greater is TheOutstanding provision for

— ofhe number unreported — he effect of legal any — he proportion of outstanding — he value of the payments – 6,738 8,000 £’000 (6,738) (2,500) 10,500 Outstanding provision

I

Provisions utilised in the year Provided in the year IBNRrevaluation Claims revaluation At 31 March At 1 April title. This includes errors resulting the fund respect in of reported but for losses resulting from errors places a legal liability on not settled (Outstanding claims provision) decreased has in projection assumptions including movement case in estimates. inflation (increase – £0.5m). in 2016/17 by £2.8m 2016/17 in (2015/16: or omissions on the register of claims incurredclaims but not reported change in thechange in prescribed Treasury discount rates (increase – £2.1m); decrease the in outstanding provisionclaims was to due a HM Land Registry to indemnify Following the actuarial review by Lane Clark & Peacock LLP (LCP), IBNR provision movement were: a and changesand to underlying £2.1m increase). The£2.1m provision for £9.1m increase). £9.1m (IBNR provision) increased has 2016/17 by £2.5m2016/17 (2015/16: 16.2 ndemnity Fund The Land Registration Act 2002 The reasons main for the £2.8m Thereason for the £2.5m Uncertainty in the provisions– We have also considered extreme sensitivity analysis scenarios, where the value of liabilities is as much as £2.5m The value of the Indemnity Fund (Outstanding provision) or provisions are subject to future £55m (IBNR provision) greater uncertain final settlement value, than expected. The long-term both for known claims and open-ended nature of statutory claims incurred but not reported indemnity means that these (IBNR). The uncertainty in value figures do not represent the of outstanding claims could lead maximum possible liability. to a variation in the proposed However, we believe the likelihood provision. A range of scenarios of such scenarios to be small. have been considered in respect of the assumptions on: The degree of uncertainty at future — the number of claims that will accounting dates may be different be received; from that illustrated here. This could be for a number of reasons, — the average claim size; for example because the profile — the percentage of claim values of claims has changed or because paid on settlement (small and the outlook on future claim trends large); has changed. — the proportion of claims that are ‘large’ (Outstanding and At future accounting dates, it IBNR); and should be expected that: — the rate of inflation and — the outstanding provision will expected discount rates. fluctuate depending on the volume of claims reported These scenarios have been at the time, especially large considered in isolation and claims; and combination as shown in the tables on page 117. — all else being equal the IBNR provision will increase over On the basis of this analysis work time because of inflationary and in respect of the adverse forces both the Outstanding scenarios: provision and the IBNR provision will be particularly — it is reasonably foreseeable sensitive to the number and that the value of liabilities value of fraud and forgery could be about £0.6m claims as these are the most (Outstanding provision) or financially significant category £8m (IBNR provision) greater of claims. than expected; and The Indemnity Fund provision — it is unlikely, but possible, that of £85.1m is our best estimate. the value of the liabilities However, the value of the could be about £1.5m Indemnity Fund provisions are (Outstanding provision) or subject to future uncertainty. £16m (IBNR provision) greater than expected. In respect of the favourable scenarios: — it is reasonably foreseeable that the value of the liabilities could be about £7m (IBNR) lower than expected. By their nature, these figures are not precise and they can only illustrate the magnitude of uncertainty involved.

116 Financial statements 117

% % – 0.7 7.8 8.5 28.2 19.6 – 9.0 5.1 5.1 6.9 7.1 21.3 11.0 10.6 16.6 73.7 -5.1 -5.1 -7.1 -6.9 -9.2 -6.9 2016/17 increase increase movement movement Percentage Percentage

4.9

9.6 8 £m 8.4 8.6 8.1 8.7 £m 84.0 93.5 81.0 81.0 85.6 85.3 89.9 82.6 82.4 73.2 71.6 71.8 70.0 71.8 73.2 77.1 10.3 133.9

Outstanding IBNR provision provision

by a further pa 1% Extreme scenarios Possible unlikely but scenarios Extreme scenarios (4) Large claims assumed payment increased from 60% to 100% (6) Prescribed real discount rate on cash flows beyond years 10 reduced (7) Increase in assumed large average claim size (from £680k to £980k) Possible unlikely but scenarios Impact scenariosof Impact scenarios of Favourable but foreseeable scenarios Favourable Provided in these accounts (see note16.2 – reasonably foreseeable value) Provided in these accounts (see note 16.2 – reasonably foreseeable value) Adverse but foreseeable scenarios foreseeable but Adverse Adverse but foreseeable scenarios foreseeable but Adverse (2) + (3) + (4) (1) Large(1) claims assumed payment percentage increased from 60% to 70% (5) Increase in assumed future claims inflation (+1%) (3) Increase in assumed large average claim size (from 680k to 780k) (4) Increase in projected number of largeclaims (from 6.5 per to incident 7.5 year) (2) Increase in assumed attritional average claim size (+10%) (1) Increase(1) in projected number of attritional IBNR claims (+10%) (2) Attritional claims paid are 5% greater than expected (3) Treasury prescribed real discount rate reduces further by 0.5% pa (2) + (3) (1) + (2)(1) (1) + (2)(1) + (4) + (5) + (6) + (7) (2) Decrease in assumed attritional average claim size (-10%) attritional average in assumed (2) Decrease £680k to £580k) claim size (from average large in assumed (3) Decrease 6.5 to 5.5 per incident year) claims (from of large number in projected (4) Decrease claims inflation (-1% pa) future in assumed (5) Decrease on cashflows discount10 years by 1% pa rate beyond real increased (6) Prescribed (1) Decrease in projected number of attritional number IBNR in projected claims (-10%) (1) Decrease (1) + (5)(1) Sensitivity analysis 17 Capital commitments

2016/17 2015/16 £’000 £’000 Capital expenditure 2,670 –

Contracted for but not provided in these accounts 2,670 –

* £2.5m relates to commitments for development of Local Land Charges for HM Land Registry.

18 Contingent liabilities

18.1 Indemnity The Land Registration Act 2002 HM Land Registry. HM Land As at 31 March 2016, the value of places a legal liability on Registry provides for these claims pending indemnity claims made to HM Land Registry to indemnify under its Indemnity Fund both for HM Land Registry is shown below. for losses resulting from errors known claims and claims incurred Included in this total is an amount or omissions on the register of but not reported (IBNR) (see note of £8m provided in the Indemnity title. This includes errors resulting 16.2) based on the assumed Fund provision (see note 16.2). from frauds perpetrated by third likelihood that claims will be parties. As a statutory insurer successful. of titles in England and Wales, indemnity payments are not confined to mistakes made by

Errors or omissions 2016/17 2015/16 £’000 £’000 Mistakes 7,290 10,337

Fraud and forgery 9,387 11,769

16,677 22,106

118 Financial statements 119

338 (246) 6,466 5,229 3,429 £’000 £’000 (1,458) (5,952) (2,265) (2,256) 41,188 55,673 46,119 11,200 397,752 2015/16 2015/16 443,871 therefore was not a position in to position HM Land at Registry. not a director Ordnance at Survey influence contract negotiations. survey data and services with on 11 January was 2016, on a non- 11 executive director Ordnance at LRB as Assistant Chief Executive He left HM Land Registry on Survey prior to taking his up and will runand until 2023. He was theat onset of this contract and Craig who Lester, joined the Ordnance Survey began 2013 in

31 October31 2016. The contract for the provision of

696 349 724 300 (425) (584) 2,652 4,347 £’000 £’000 (4,831) (1,592) 69,430 46,055 71,066 2016/17 2016/17 443,871 489,926 with Consulting as planning PA within the programme itself he was HM Land a partner. potential conflict of interest managed through strict controls material transactions undertaken by HM Land Registry, except as mentioned below. disclosed by the Local Land delegated within letter his of delegation. HM Land Registry on 1 November Registry currently a contract has Land Charges programme. The Programme Director, joined Steve Local Land Calder, Charges and deliveryand partner on the Local been has and from the outset, theseand arealso articulated as limitations on the authority ChargesProgramme Director is, 2015 from Consulting where PA

R R N R

Net cash at end of period Net cash inflow from operating activities Net cash at start of period Operating surplus Decrease provisions in Decrease inventories in Increase/(decrease) the period cash in in Restructure and reorganisation costs reorganisation and Restructure Local Land Charges revenue costs Depreciation of property, plant andequipment Increase payables in Impairment in value of non-current assets Increase Indemnity in Fund Amortisation of intangible assets (Increase)/decrease receivables in the of a number had has it year the Department for Communities surplus to net cash inflow from material transactions with other party transactions. party disclosures, as interpreted by the FReM, the following been with Ordnance Survey, members of the key management influence any had have over any information provided is on related operating activities staff or other related parties, government departments and other central government bodies. government department. During Most of these transactions have HM Land Registry executive an is HM Courts & Tribunals ServiceHM Courts & Tribunals and None of the board members, or In accordanceIn with IAS Related 24 agency, tradingagency, fund and and Localand Government. 20 elated party disclosures 19.2 econciliation of net cash flow to movement net in cash 19.1 econciliation of operating 19 otes to the cash flow statement 21 Corporate financial targets

2016/17 2015/16

Actual Target Actual Target

% % % %

Percentage return on average capital employed 15.1 4.6 8.6 3.6

22 Financial instruments

International Financial Reporting HM Land Registry has no As all material assets and Standard 7 Financial instruments: borrowings and relies primarily on liabilities are denominated in disclosures requires disclosure income from statutory activities sterling HM Land Registry is not of the role financial instruments and is therefore not exposed to exposed to currency risk. have had during the period in liquidity risks. Material deposits creating or changing the risks an are held with the Government entity faces in undertaking its Banking Service and the National activities. Loans Fund. 23 Events after the reporting period

In accordance with the requirements of IAS 10 Events after the reporting period, events after the statement of financial position date are considered up to the date on which the accounts are authorised for issue. This is interpreted as the date of the certificate and report of the Comptroller and Auditor General.

Non-adjusting event after the reporting period There are no non-adjusting events after the reporting period.

120 Appendices 121 – – – 75.9 85.9 78.2 83.2 92.3 92.9 99.4 99.1 63.9 98.8 90.2 83.2 94.0 94.0 90.2 98.8 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

% of applications/ products received through online services – – – 73,125 957,449 175,592 214,026 728,965 129,046 828,978 3,622,241 7,398,605 3,926,879 5,325,027 2,409,063 7,398,605 3,926,879 16,898,741 13,760,713 28,224,225 16,898,741 28,224,225 28,224,225

Applications/ products received through online services 73,125 170,108 957,449 334,762 111,309 828,978 789,622 224,529 682,991 352,348 4,721,574 2,424,335 4,215,628 5,325,027 8,202,332 4,721,574 8,202,332 17,096,106 13,882,149 17,096,106 30,372,360 30,020,012 30,020,012 2015/16 Total applications/ products received – – – 89.1 93.0 83.4 92.3 99.4 99.3 99.1 86.4 86.6 63.4 90.3 94.8 94.8 90.3 86.7 98.8

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

% of applications/ products received through online services – – – 67,415 151,216 192,978 951,324 726,699 199,239 7,717,039 7,717,039 2,371,719 5,413,795 4,255,148 3,904,693 4,255,148 1,091,527 17,633,247 14,533,418 29,605,434 17,631,836 29,605,434 29,605,434

Applications/ products received through online services 67,415 591,774 715,510 951,324 181,295 109,030 771,064 304,556 230,564 5,413,795 8,544,127 1,091,527 2,381,867 4,905,545 4,384,656 8,544,127 4,905,545 17,794,584 14,641,653 31,836,030 17,794,584 31,244,256 31,244,256 2016/17 Total applications/ products received 1 1

Preliminary services products Official copies Official searches of the index map Dealings of whole with land registered Total applications applications Total excluding BRUs Dispositionary first leases Application intake by type method and of receipt Transfers of part of land registered Official searches Substantive applications excluding BRUs First registrations Enquiry services applications Substantive applications excluding BRUs Preliminary services products Enquiry services applications Register views Bulk register updates (BRUs) Total applications/productsTotal Title plan views MapSearch PDF downloads Document views Correspondence enquiries Telephone

Volumes and workloadsVolumes 2016/17 and 2015/16 Appendix A For accompanying text see overleaf. The table above sets out the transactional activities for the year, along with comparatives for the previous year. In this financial year we serviced more than 31 million applications, fulfilling the requirements of the 2002 Land Registration Act. These form the core of our activities and the revenues associated with them. The table also details our progress towards electronic delivery, in relation to the various types of application we receive. Excluding bulk register updates (BRUs), the proportion of applications received electronically rose from 94% to 94.8%.

Bulk register updates are groups of applications lodged at HM Land Registry affecting a large volume of registered titles, such as a bank changing the address for service on all of its registered charges. The levels of receipt of such applications are volatile in their nature and are therefore separated from other application types in order to avoid distortion of the data.

Note: An official copy application may result in more than one register and/or title plan being supplied. A search of the index map application may give rise to more than one title number being revealed. For this reason the number of registers/title plans or the number of title numbers revealed are used as a metric rather than the number of applications themselves. These are termed products.

122 Appendices 123 4,218 3,530 -2.23 +7.28 -4.08 +9.96 -14.76 -20.54 Total on farming stock other and agricultural assets of the farmer. appropriate authority used is and to establish whether property any assets are individuals held against or companies. Some elements of customer accounts are also the managed in Land Charges Department. Percentage variation compared with 2015/16 2,541 2,293 Searches 8,671 25,490 42,572 172,098 1,511,711 1,760,542 675 820 Cancellations and rectifications term loans by banks Part under ofll the Agricultural Credits Act 1928. These charges are secured encumbrances registered against the names of owners of property, which are not registered under the Land Registration Acts.The department also maintains the Index of Proprietors’ Names (IOPN). This index can be searched only on productionagainst of the Number ofNumber applicationsor names in 2016/17 857 562 New registrations New

– Searches limited to insolvency Official searches searches– Full Type of application Type New registrations, rectifications renewalsand Cancellations Office copies Total Year 2015/16 2016/17 The Agricultural Credits Department TheAgricultural Credits Department responsible is for a registermaintaining of short- The department maintains registers of Land Charges, pending actions, writs and orders affecting other and land workloads 2016/17 and 2015/16 2015/16 2016/17 and workloads The Land Charges Department The Land Charges Department operates the under authority of the Land Charges Act 1972. Land Charges and Agricultural Creditsvolumes and Appendix B Appendix C Treasury Minute HM Land Registry Trading Fund HM Treasury Minute dated 24 April 2012 1. Section 4(1) of the Government Trading Funds Act 1973 (“the 1973 Act”) provides that a Trading Fund established under that Act shall be under the control and management of the responsible Minister (or, where a Trading Fund is established for operations carried on by a person appointed in pursuance of any enactment, that person, if the Order establishing the Trading Fund in accordance with section 1(6) (a) of the 1973 Act) and in the discharge of his functions in relation to the fund it shall be his duty: (a) To manage the funded operations so that the revenue of the fund: (i) Consists principally of receipts in respect of goods and services provided in the course of the funded operations, and (ii) is not less than sufficient, taking one year with another, to meet outgoings which are properly chargeable to revenue account; and (b) To achieve such further financial objectives as the Treasury may from time to time, by minute laid before the House of Commons, indicate as having been determined by the responsible Minister (with Treasury concurrence) to be desirable of achievement. 2. The Trading Fund for HM Land Registry was established on 1 April 1993 under the Land Registry Trading Fund Order 1993 (SI 1993 No.938). Article 3 (2) of that Order provides that the Trading Fund shall be under the control and management of the Chief Land Registrar. Additional assets were appropriated to the Trading Fund on 11 March 1996 under the Land Registry Trading Fund (Additional Assets) Order 1996 (SI 1996 No. 750). On 13 October 2003, the Trading Fund was extended and amended under the Land Registry Trading Fund (Extension and Amendment) Order 2003 (SI 2003 No. 2094). 3. The Secretary of State for the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills, being the responsible Minister for the purposes of section 4(1)(b) of the 1973 Act, has determined (with Treasury concurrence) that a further financial objective desirable of achievement by HM Land Registry to achieve, over the period from 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2017, a return, averaged over the period as a whole, of at least 3.5 per cent real1 in accordance with Managing Public Money. This will take the form of an operating surplus on ordinary activities post exceptional items and interest (payable and receivable), but before dividends, expressed as a percentage of average capital employed. Capital employed shall equate to the total assets from which shall be deducted the total liabilities. 4. This Minute supersedes that dated 15 December 2003. 5. Let a copy of this Minute be laid before the House of Commons pursuant to section 4(1)(b) of the Government Trading Funds Act 1973.

1 3.5 per cent real will be calculated annually as 3.5 per cent plus the latest inflation estimate for that year, provided by ONS. By way of a worked example, for the fiscal year 2012/13 the financial target will be 6.29 per cent. This has been calculated as (1+3.5 per cent)* (1+ 2.7 per cent), where 2.7 per cent is the ONS 2012/13 inflation estimate (National Accounts figures from the ONS, http:// www.hm-treasury.gov. uk /data_ gdp _fig.htm, 22 December 2011).

HM Treasury 24 April 2012

124 Appendices 125 0% 0% -9% -28% -27% -22% -15% -21% -51% -36% -54% -41% -44% -41% -49% -47% Actual percentage reduction (cumulative) Actual percentage reduction (cumulative) Gross emissions have reduced by reduced have emissions Gross the baseline. 49% over 959 907 1,689 1,048 1,979 1,443 1,421 1,106 9,128 8,656 8,392 7,328 14,326 13,099 11,211 11,340 Actual waste Actual GHG 9,885 1,484 8,596 1,484 1,979 1,979 1,979 1,979 1,979 1,979 14,326 14,326 14,326 14,326 14,326 13,176 Forecast waste waste Forecast (including initiatives) Forecast GHG Forecast (including initiatives) March 2020 over the baseline data2020 over March 2009/10. for 1,880 9,885 1,781 1,682 1,583 1,484 1,484 1,484 8,596 1,979 12,893 14,326 13,610 12,177 11,461 10,745 Year-on-year waste waste Year-on-year target Year-on-year Year-on-year gas greenhouse (GHG) target

Year Year 2009/10 (baseline) 2009/10 (baseline) 2010/11 2010/11 2011/12 2011/12 2012/13 2012/13 2013/14 2013/14 2014/15 2014/15 2015/16 2015/16 2016/17 2016/17

Waste arising (tonnes) arising (tonnes) Waste

Sustainability historical data Carbon data (tonnes) Appendix D The greenhouse gas draft target gas draft The greenhouse by 31% by emissions is to reduce The table shows the trend for The table for shows the trend the Greening arising against waste CommitmentsGovernment targetreduction of 25% by March was 2020. A 47% reduction arising Of the waste achieved. 698 tonnes is paper sent for loop the closed through processing paper within provision recycling This papergovernment. equates to 70% of our total arising. waste Water reduction (cubic metres)

Year Year-on-year water Forecast water Actual water Actual percentage target (including reduction initiatives) (cumulative) 2009/10 (baseline) 57,214 57,214 57,214 0% 2010/11 54,353 57,214 54,644 -4% 2011/12 51,493 57,214 37,413 -35% 2012/13 48,631 57,214 31,230 -45% 2013/14 45,771 56,984 36,037 -37% 2014/15 42,910 56,984 38,153 -33% 2015/16 45,772 45,772 36,395 -36% 2016/17 42,911 42,911 34,967 -39%

A 39% reduction in water consumption has been achieved against a target of 25%. Consumption per full-time equivalent, including staff on HM Land Registry sites from other government departments, is 6.7m3.

126 Appendices 127 0 0 0 0 0.1 0.1 0.3 2.6 1.5 11.6 71.0 12.8 100.0 Percentage of total 0 0 0 3,736 4,523 1,900 10,243 60,316 527,504 465,374 115,080 £308,388 2,248,876 1,060,200 £6,957,904 £6,649,516 Costs (£) £14.58m, including 49 fraud£14.58m, 49 including valuedclaims over just at £9m. recoveredWe £308,388 under statutoryour rights of recourse, compared with £231,298 last Recourseyear. figures tend to vary considerably from to year reflectingyear, the unpredictable interplay of legal factual and elements which determine the viability of achieving recovery. any 0 0 0 25 8,210 1,250 5,500 64,996 42,508 280,424 424,890 4,709,028 3,881,225 Substantive (£)loss 4 7 0 5 0 1 11 53 103 127 258 426 995 Number ofNumber claims single mostsingle significant cause of indemnity payments this and reflects the general trend over the past decade or so. The original maximum value of the substantive paid was claims just but these were settledover £11m saving £6.35m. During for £4.7m the claims a further year 419 valued £4.85m at were settled for no Of value. these 27 were for fraud were and valued just at over £2m. During the 1,237 year new were claims received totalling

Nature of claim Errors in/omissions from register entries Extent of registered titles Sundry errors plans Fraud and forgery and Fraud Official inspections of title plans errors Bankruptcy Official searches Official copies Errors searches in of the index map (SIMs) Errors filed in extracts Lost documents/administrative errors Gross payment Less recovered sums our under statutory right of recourse Net indemnity Total Land Charges errors

Indemnity Fund we paid under just 2016/17 In £7m for 995 claims, compared with £8m for 1,003 in claims 2015/16. The largest paid claim this was year £702,290 for a forged discharge of a mortgage. The discharge being lodged meant the property was unmortgaged theand fraudster was then able to transfer the property freely. by way of forgery (usually Fraud or impersonation) the remains Appendix E 128