Pirinate Consulting Group, LLC, As Litigation Trustee of the NP Creditor

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pirinate Consulting Group, LLC, As Litigation Trustee of the NP Creditor IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: ) Chapter 11 ) NEWPAGE CORPORATION, et al., ) Case No. 11‐12804(KG) ) Reorganized Debtors. ) PIRINATE CONSULTING GROUP, LLC, ) AS LITIGATION TRUSTEE OF THE NP ) CREDITOR LITIGATION TRUST, ) ) Adv. Pro. No. 13‐52429 Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) C. R. MEYER & SONS CO., ) ) Defendant. ) Re: D.I. 43, 48 OPINION INTRODUCTION On September 7, 2011 (the “Petition Date”), NewPage Corporation (“NewPage”) and its affiliates (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. On October 29, 2013, PIRINATE Consulting Group, LLC, the Litigation Trustee of the NP Creditor Litigation Trust (the “Trustee”)1 brought this 1 The Trustee was appointed as trustee of the Liquidation Trust pursuant to section 1.2.30 and Article V of the Plan and paragraphs 39‐41 of the Confirmation Order, and as governed by the Litigation Trust Agreement attached as Schedule 1.2.95 to the Plan. Plan Supplement Exhibits. D.I. 2829. Pursuant to the Plan and the Confirmation Order, on the effective date of December 21, 2012, the Trustee was appointed to, among other things, evaluate, commence, prosecute, litigate, and settle Committee Litigation claims (as defined in the Plan), including this adversary proceeding. Plan, D.I. 2904. adversary proceeding against C.R. Meyer & Sons Co. (“CRM”) alleging that payments made to CRM totaling $2,302,634.21 (the “Transfers”) are preferential and should be avoided (the “Avoidance Action”). In response to the Complaint, CRM filed an answer denying the allegations and asserting several affirmative defenses, including, among others, that some or all of the payments do not qualify as preferential. See CRM’s Answer. D.I. 13. Pending before the Court is CRM’s motion for summary judgment (the “Motion”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, made applicable to this adversary proceeding by Bankruptcy Rule 7056, seeking dismissal of the Trustee’s preference action. CRM’s Motion. D.I. 43. In response, the Trustee filed a cross motion for summary judgment seeking denial of the Motion and summary judgment in the Trustee’s favor (the “Cross‐Motion”). Trustee’s Cross‐Motion. D.I. 48. The issues presented by the Motion and the Cross‐Motion are these: (1) were the Transfers made pursuant to a single unified agreement or separate agreements under applicable state law; and (2) were any of the agreements assumed under the Plan such that CRM has shown, under the Kiwi Defense discussed below, that it did not receive more than it would have received in a Chapter 7 case? For the reasons stated herein, the Court will grant partial summary judgment in favor of the Trustee as to the divisibility of the agreements and partial summary judgment in favor of CRM as to the assumption of the Master Agreement. 2 JURISDICTION The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this controversy under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334 and 157(a). This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B), and (F). FACTS The Debtors and CRM have had a business relationship for over twenty years. Declaration of Bradley S. Riutta, dated August 31, 2016 (“Riutta Declaration”) ¶ 3. D.I. 43‐3. CRM, a Wisconsin corporation, provides general contracting services for large commercial projects, including construction management and consulting. Stipulated Facts ¶ 1. D.I. 38. NewPage, a Delaware corporation, was engaged in the operation of paper mills in various locations throughout the United States. Id. CRM handled all of the maintenance and construction needs at the Debtors’ plants in Escanaba, Michigan (the “Escanaba Facility”) and Duluth, Minnesota (the “Duluth Facility”). Riutta Declaration ¶ 4. Almost two years before the Petition Date, in October 2009, the parties entered into a Master Construction Agreement to provide the terms and conditions of the work CRM would provide for NewPage (the “Master Agreement”). Riutta Declaration ¶ 12‐13. CRM employees at the Escanaba and Duluth Facilities worked at the direction of NewPage employees and their work was later coded against a corresponding purchase order (“Purchase Order”) and invoiced to NewPage on a weekly basis. Riutta Declaration ¶ 5. To coordinate such work, CRM supervisors attended maintenance planning 3 meetings with NewPage employees where they reviewed previously issued repair requests. Id. At the Escanaba Facility, CRM maintained its own equipment needed for the maintenance work. Riutta Declaration ¶ 6. CRM also routinely used NewPage’s equipment, including a backhoe, optical equipment, and specialty rigging equipment. Id. At the Escanaba and Duluth Facilities, NewPage provided CRM with offices, storage space for their equipment, and mill‐owned pagers—before cell phones—to allow NewPage to immediately contact CRM supervisors in case of an emergency and to facilitate day‐to‐day operations. Riutta Declaration ¶ 7. The NewPage Bankruptcy Case On September 7, 2011, the Debtors filed petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. A little over a year later, on December 14, 2012, the Court confirmed the Debtors’ Modified Fourth Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan (the “Plan”) and entered findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the Plan and a Confirmation Order. D.I. 2904, 2944, 2945. On December 21, 2012, all conditions to the effectiveness of the Plan had been satisfied or waived, and the Plan was substantially consummated. Stipulated Facts ¶ 3. The Plan included a provision for the treatment of executory contracts. Article VIII of the Plan provided that the Debtors assumed any executory contract that had not expired by its own terms on, or prior to, the Confirmation Date and was not otherwise addressed during the pendency of the Chapter 11 cases or listed on Plan Schedules 8.1(A)‐ 4 (E) (the “Catchall Provision”). Stipulated Facts ¶ 5. “Executory Contract” is a defined term under the Plan and means “a contract or unexpired lease to which one or more of the Debtors is a party and which is subject to assumption . under Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code at the election of the Debtors.” Plan Art. I.2.62. The Master Agreement is not listed on Schedules 8.1(A)‐(E). Stipulated Facts ¶ 7. Post‐petition, CRM’s day‐to‐day operations continued as usual at the Escanaba Facility. Riutta Declaration ¶ 15. Indeed, CRM fulfilled and invoiced several Purchase Orders, which had been placed pre‐petition. Id. CRM completed $548,087.67 of work pursuant to Purchase Orders outstanding when the Plan was confirmed and NewPage paid for these services after confirmation. Riutta Declaration ¶ 19. The Avoidance Action Before filing the Motion and the Cross‐Motion, the parties conducted limited discovery and on August 20, 2015, they engaged in a mediation session. Stipulated Facts ¶ 11. As a result of the mediation, the parties entered into a Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (the “Stipulation”) agreeing, among other things, to a briefing schedule on the issue of whether the Debtors assumed the Master Agreement and the purchase orders issued thereunder through the Confirmation Order thus providing CRM an absolute defense to the Avoidance Action. See Stipulation ¶ 3. D.I. 37. On July 5, 2016, the Court entered an Order approving the Stipulation and the parties filed Stipulated Facts. 5 The Master Agreement On October 7, 2009, NewPage, as Owner, and CRM, as Contractor, entered into the Master Agreement, pursuant to which CRM would: provide all engineering, design and other similar services; labor; materials; tools; supplies; equipment; machinery; administration; transportation; supervision and all other services and items necessary for the proper execution and completion of the work described in [NewPage]’s purchase orders to be issued from time to time under this Agreement (the “Work”) at [NewPage]’s mills located at Rumford, Maine; Escanaba, Michigan; Duluth, Minnesota; Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin; Biron, Wisconsin; Whiting, Wisconsin; Stevens Point, Wisconsin and Wickliffe, Kentucky (the “Property”). Stipulated Facts ¶ 6.2 Section 1 of the Master Agreement further details the role of the Master Agreement and defines key terms. Under the Master Agreement, the parties were not bound to award or accept all Work from each other: “nothing in this Agreement or in any Purchase Order shall be interpreted as requiring either that Owner award any particular work to Contractor or that Contractor accept any such award except as expressly stated in the Purchase Orders.” Master Agreement § 1. Further, the Master Agreement refers to each Purchase Order issued by NewPage as a separate contract: Each such Purchase Order . together with the . Agreement . shall constitute separate contracts between the Contractor and Owner. Each such separate contract is hereinafter referred to as the “Contract.” This Agreement shall serve as a master agreement governing all of the Contracts between Contractor and Owner. 2 The term “Work” is defined in the Master Agreement and the Court will capitalize the word. 6 Master Agreement § 1. The Purchase Orders either reference the Master Agreement directly or the Master Agreement through another Purchase Order stating, “This purchase order and all work performed hereunder shall be subject and controlled by the latest Master Construction Agreement on file.” Riutta Declaration ¶ 11. In their course of dealing, the Purchase Orders served to document Work to be performed by CRM and to facilitate the payment of invoices. Riutta Declaration ¶ 9. The Purchase Orders triggered payment for Work. Id. at ¶ 5. At times, the Purchase Orders were created after CRM employees began Work and, occasionally, after CRM employees completed work. Riutta Declaration ¶ 8. If CRM employees completed work without a Purchase Order, CRM needed to follow up with the NewPage accounting department to create the Purchase Order so that CRM could issue an invoice and get paid for the Work. Riutta Declaration ¶ 10. In the event that NewPage wished to have CRM perform Work “separate and distinct from Work already covered by an existing Purchase Order,” the Master Agreement directed NewPage to “issue a new Purchase Order rather than change order for such new Work.
Recommended publications
  • United States District Court for the District of Maine
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ) MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS,) AFL-CIO, LOCAL LODGE NO. 1821, on behalf ) of its individual members employed at the ) Bucksport Paper Mill; RICHARD GILLEY, ) individually and as IAMAW District 4 Business ) Representative for Local Lodge 1821; ) COREY DARVEAU, individually and as ) CIVIL ACTION NO. : President of Local Lodge 1821; ) BRIAN SIMPSON, individually and as Vice ) President of Local Lodge 1821; ) BRIAN ABBOTT, individually and as Recording ) Secretary of Local Lodge 1821; and ) HAROLD PORTER, individually and as Financial ) Secretary for Local Lodge 1821, ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) VERSO PAPER CORP., a Delaware Corporation; ) VERSO PAPER LLC, a Delaware Limited ) Liability Company (LLC) and a wholly owned ) subsidiary of Verso Paper Corp., ) ) AIM DEVELOPMENT (USA) LLC, a ) Delaware Limited Liability Company and indirect ) wholly-owned subsidiary of American Iron & ) Metal Company, Inc., ) ____________Defendants.________________ ____) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF I. SUMMARY OF THIS ACTION 1. This action for Declaratory and Injunctive relief against Verso Paper Corp. and its subsidiary Verso Paper LLC (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Verso”) arises out of Verso’s intentional decision to shut down and ultimately destroy the operational capability of its coated printing paper mill at Bucksport, Maine (“Bucksport”). Verso seeks to reduce output in the market for coated paper, which it will dominate as a consequence of its acquisition of its largest rival, NewPage Holdings Inc. (“NewPage”). In accordance with the terms of its acquisition agreement with NewPage, Verso has arranged to transfer Bucksport to AIM Development (USA) LLC ("AIM"), a buyer that intends to close Bucksport as a paper manufacturing facility and convert the property for non-paper manufacturing uses.
    [Show full text]
  • National Wildlife Federation, Mcgraw-Hill and Newpage Corporation Launch Innovative Textbook Recycling Project
    Contact: Max Greenberg 703-438-6018 [email protected] National Wildlife Federation, McGraw-Hill and NewPage Corporation Launch Innovative Textbook Recycling Project Reston, VA. (March 28, 2011) – A new grant from The McGraw-Hill Companies to the National Wildlife Federation (NWF) will launch a textbook recycling program, the first of its kind that engages educational institutions and corporate stakeholders with the aim of reducing waste and promoting sustainable development. NWF’s Eco-Schools USA and Campus Ecology programs will use the one-year grant to: engage NewPage Corporation, one of McGraw-Hill’s paper manufacturers, to de- ink textbook pages so that their paper fiber can be reused in new books; increase awareness of textbook recycling; and conduct further research on the lifecycles and supply chains of textbooks. NWF will pilot the program in the K-12 and higher education sectors in Wisconsin and Minnesota with the goal of eventually extending it to other parts of the country. “This innovative textbook recycling program is a natural fit with National Wildlife Federation’s work to promote business and educational practices that are healthy for our environment,” said Kevin Coyle, NWF’s vice president of Education and Training. “It also aligns with our work on sustainably procured paper, which in part relies on an increased supply of recovered fiber.” Under this grant, NWF will select two undergraduate student fellows from its Campus Ecology program to manage the recycling pilot. The fellows will coordinate textbook recycling events, increase awareness and education about consumption, waste, and the recycling process and expand the reach of NWF’s Eco-Schools USA and Campus Ecology programs.
    [Show full text]
  • LCD ISSUER REPORT Newpage First-Quarter Earnings Review
    May 17, 2011 LCD ISSUER REPORT NewPage First-quarter earnings review NewPage reported adjusted EBITDA of $85 million International Paper, Condé Nast Publications, Quad/ for the quarter ended March 31, versus $2 million in Graphics, R.R. Donnelley, Sears, and Lindenmeyr. the comparable period of 2010. Leverage improved NewPage operates mills in Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, signifi cantly as LTM adjusted EBITDA increased to Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Nova Scotia, $324 million, from $78 million a year ago. Effective Canada, with aggregate annual production capacity of May 10, Robert Nardelli resigned from the board of 4.1 million tons. directors and was replaced by Thomas Zambelli. The current quarter is the last easy comp for the company. A review of the company’s 10-Q and press release reveals the following: In light of the earnings release, the following report will discuss the company’s strengths and weaknesses going • Quarterly revenue increased by $87 million year over forward. year, to $904 million, but it declined sequentially, from $946 million. The increase was attributed to Note that this analysis is not affi liated in any way with a higher volume of core products and higher sales S&P’s ratings group and does not include any non-public prices. Core volume advanced by 14% year over year, information, as LCD is not privy to that information. to 829,000 tons, but it declined sequentially by 9.4%, from 915,000 tons. Key financial data $ thousand 3/31/2011 3/31/2010 Change • Gross margin for the quarter increased to 11.9%, versus Sales: 1Q 904,000 817,000 11% 4.4% a year ago, but it declined sequentially, from Sales: LTM 3,683,000 3,201,000 15% 15.8%.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to State Statistical Abstracts
    Guide to State Statistical Abstracts This bibliography includes the most recent statistical abstracts for states published since 1987 plus those that will be issued in late 1999. For some states, a near equivalent has been listed in substitution for or in addition to a statistical abstract. All sources contain statistical tables on a variety of subjects for the state as a whole, its component parts, or both. The page counts given for publications are approximate. Internet sites also contain statistical data. Alabama Colorado University of Alabama, Center for Business University of Colorado, Business Research and Economic Research, Box 870221, Division, Campus Box 420, Boulder Tuscaloosa 35487-0221. 205-348-6191. 80309-0420. 303-492-8227. Internet Internet site <http://www.cba. site <http://www.colorado.edu/ ua.edu/cber/> libraries/govpubs/online/htm> Economic Abstract of Alabama. 1997. Statistical Abstract of Colorado, 1987. 488 pp. 600 pp. (Latest and last edition). Alaska Connecticut Department of Commerce and Economic Connecticut Department of Economic & Development, Division of Trade & Community Development, 505 Hudson Development, P.O. Box 110804, St., Hartford 06106. 1-860-270-8165. Juneau 99811-0804. 907-465-2017. Internet site <http://www.state.ct. Internet site <http://www.commerce. us/ecd/> state.ak.us/trade/> Connecticut Market Data. Fall/winter The Alaska Economy Performance 1999. (Diskette also available.) Report. 1996 Connecticut Town Profiles, 1998-99. 340 pp. Arizona University of Arizona, Economic and Delaware Business Research, College of Business Delaware Economic Development Office, and Public Administration, McClelland 99 Kings Highway, Dover 19901. Hall 401 Tucson Arizona 85721-0001. 302-739-4271.
    [Show full text]
  • Douglas K. Cooper Joined the Douglas K
    ® Douglas K. Cooper joined the Douglas K. Cooper NewPage senior leadership team Vice President, in November 2005 as vice president, General Counsel and Secretary general counsel and secretary. In this position, Mr. Cooper is responsible for leading corporate strategic and tactical legal initiatives, advising senior leaders on operational issues, ABOUT NEWPAGE CORPORATION managing the legal function and overseeing outside counsel work. He also leads the corporate compliance program, participates Headquartered in Miamisburg, Ohio, in business transactions and negotiates critical contracts. NewPage Corporation is the largest printing paper manufacturer in North Prior to joining NewPage, Mr. Cooper was a business attorney for America, based on production capacity with more than $4.3 billion in net sales. Arent Fox PLLC in Novi, Michigan. The company’s product portfolio is the broadest in North America and includes From 2001 to 2003, Mr. Cooper was a senior vice president of coated freesheet, coated groundwood, supercalendered and specialty papers. law for GDX Automotive in Farmington Hills, Michigan. From These papers are used for corporate 1997 to 2001, he served as executive vice president, general collateral, commercial printing, magazines, counsel and secretary for Peregrine Incorporated. He was also catalogs, books, coupons, inserts, packaging applications and direct employed by Leaseway Transportation Corp. in Beachwood, Ohio, mail advertising. as vice president of operations law. He joined Leaseway in 1976 NewPage owns paper mills located in and held positions of increasing responsibility during his tenure Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, with the company. Minnesota, Wisconsin and Nova Scotia, Canada. These mills have a total annual production capacity of approximately Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • A Research Study on Textbook Recycling in America Recommendations for Proper Disposal and Repurposing at the End of a Textbook’S Useful Life
    A Research Study on Textbook Recycling in America Recommendations for Proper Disposal and Repurposing at the End of a Textbook’s Useful Life Laura S. Hickey and Kristy M. Jones November 2012 National Wildlife Federation 11100 Wildlife Center Drive Reston, VA 20190 T: 703-438-6000 W: www.nwf.org A Research Study on Textbook Recycling in America | 2 The National Wildlife Federation would like to gratefully acknowledge the generous support of the McGraw- Hill Companies and NewPage Corporation for funding and supporting this research project. This report is the culmination of many months of research, not only by NWF and its Campus Fellows, but also our program partners – McGraw-Hill and NewPage Corporation. The National Wildlife Federation is greatly appreciative of the many hours that key staff from McGraw-Hill and NewPage Corporation devoted to this effort. Key collaborators include Mr. David W. Schaefer, Vice President, Paper Operations, McGraw-Hill; Mr. Brian Kozlowski, Director, Sustainable Development, NewPage Corporation; Mr. David Bonistall, Vice President, Environmental Health and Safety, NewPage Corporation; Ms. Kelly Xydis, Corporate Sales, NewPage Corporation; Ms. Laura Banken, NWF’s Campus Fellow from the College of Saint Scholastica in Duluth, Minnesota, and Ms. Courtney Cochran, Coordinator, NWF’s Campus Ecology Program. Founded in 1888, The McGraw-Hill Companies is a leading global financial information and education company that powers the Knowledge Economy. Well-known brands include Standard & Poor’s, McGraw-Hill Education, Platts and J.D. Power and Associates. To learn more, visit www.mcgraw-hill.com. NewPage is the leading producer of printing and specialty papers in North America with $3.5 billion in net sales for the year ended December 31, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • North Branch Potomac River at Luke, Maryland
    North Branch Potomac River at Luke, Maryland Latitude: Longitude: Gauge Elevation: Drainage Area: County of Gage: County of Town: Weather Office: 39°28'44.3" or 39.478889° N 79°03'49.6" or 79.063889° W 943.68 feet 406 mi2 Mineral, WV Allegany, MD Sterling Major Basin: Sub Basin: Minor Sub Basin: Minor: Moderate: Major: Potomac North Branch Potomac North Branch Potomac 10.50 12.50 15.00 Period of Record (used in flood frequency) Outside Period of Record (not used in flood frequency) 10/1/1978 to Present 1902 to 9/30/1978 Feet Flood Impacts 20.00 Water overtops the railroad bridges at the Newpage Mill. 17.00 Levees protect the Newpage Mill at Luke up to approximately this level. If water reaches the top of the levee, water may affect the plant. 16.00 Water reaches the railroad tracks in the town of Westernport. 15.00 Significant flooding is occurring in Westernport and Piedmont, with buildings and roads flooded. 13.50 Maryland Route 135 begins to flood west of the town of Luke. Water also reaches the underside of railroad bridges at the Newpage Mill. Backwater from the Potomac begins to flood the town of Westernport. Portions of Maryland Route 135 east of downtown may be affected, and water 12.50 will approach Westernport Elementary School. This flooding will be more severe if Georges Creek is also in flood. 12.00 Floodwaters begin to affect portions of Piedmont, West Virginia. If water levels are elevated on Georges Creek, a combination of the creek and backwater from the Potomac will begin to flood the town of 10.50 Westernport.
    [Show full text]
  • For Immediate Release Newpage Announces Third
    Media Contact: Investor Contact: NewPage Corporation Amber Garwood Tim Nusbaum 8540 Gander Creek Drive 937-242-9093 937-242-9196 Miamisburg, OH 45342 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NEWPAGE ANNOUNCES THIRD QUARTER 2007 FINANCIAL RESULTS Miamisburg, Ohio. – November 8, 2007 – NewPage Corporation today announced its financial results for the third quarter of 2007. Net sales were $545 million in the third quarter of 2007 compared to $522 million in the third quarter of 2006, an increase of 4.4%. The increase was driven by favorable coated paper sales volume, partially offset by a decrease in average coated paper prices and a decrease in sales of uncoated paper and market pulp. Coated paper sales volumes increased from 528,000 tons in the third quarter of 2006 to 576,000 tons in the third quarter of 2007. Average coated paper prices decreased from $907 per ton in the third quarter of 2006 to $884 per ton in the third quarter of 2007. The company did not take any market-related downtime for coated paper in the third quarter of 2007 or 2006. Net income was $16 million in the third quarter of 2007 compared to net income of $2 million in the third quarter of 2006. EBITDA was $79 million for the third quarter of 2007 compared to $70 million for the third quarter of 2006. Significant items in 2006 included an unrealized non-cash loss of $2 million for the basket option contract. “With continuing increased input costs, additional industry capacity was closed during the quarter. We recently announced two price increases that we began to realize in the third quarter and we expect to see additional benefits from these announced increases in the fourth quarter of 2007,” said Mark A.
    [Show full text]
  • Barry Nelson Has Been with Barry Nelson Newpage Since the Inception Senior Vice President of the Company
    ® Barry Nelson has been with Barry Nelson NewPage since the inception Senior Vice President of the company. Prior to serving Sales as senior vice president of sales, Mr. Nelson was working as vice president of printing sales, responsible for all merchant coated sales, national account ABOUT NEWPAGE CORPORATION sales, publication printing sales and major catalog sales that represented approximately 80 percent of the volume Headquartered in Miamisburg, Ohio, (approximately 1.6 billion) of the coated sales for NewPage. NewPage Corporation is the largest printing paper manufacturer in North Mr. Nelson has been in the paper industry and related industries America, based on production capacity with more than $4.3 billion in net sales. for the past 20 years in a number of roles including major account The company’s product portfolio is the sales, coated sales group management for the East and West broadest in North America and includes coasts for NewPage, vice president of marketing services/sales coated freesheet, coated groundwood, supercalendered and specialty papers. support at Mead Paper, and vice president of sales, marketing These papers are used for corporate and client delivery groups at ForestExpress (a technology services collateral, commercial printing, magazines, joint venture between International Paper, Weyerhaeuser, catalogs, books, coupons, inserts, packaging applications and direct Georgia Pacifi c, Mead, Willamette and Boise Cascade). mail advertising. NewPage owns paper mills located in Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Nova Scotia, Canada. These mills have a total annual production capacity of approximately 5.5 million tons of paper, including 4.3 million tons of coated paper, 920,000 tons of uncoated paper and 300,000 tons of specialty paper, as well as 3.2 million tons of pulp.
    [Show full text]
  • Verso to Acquire Newpage to Create Stronger Coated Paper Producer
    January 6, 2014 Verso to Acquire NewPage to Create Stronger Coated Paper Producer Substantially Deleveraged Verso Better Positioned to Deliver Long-Term Value for Stakeholders in Increasingly Competitive Industry MEMPHIS, Tenn., & MIAMISBURG, Ohio--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Verso Paper Corp. (NYSE:VRS), a leading North American producer of coated papers, and NewPage Holdings Inc., a leading producer of printing and specialty papers, today announced that they have entered into a definitive agreement under which Verso will acquire NewPage in a transaction valued at $1.4 billion. Upon closing of the transaction, the combined company will have sales of approximately $4.5 billion and 11 manufacturing facilities located in six states. The transaction, which has been unanimously approved by the boards of directors of both companies, is expected to close in the second half of 2014, subject to regulatory approvals. Compelling Strategic Rationale "The combination of Verso and NewPage will create a stronger business that is better positioned to serve our customers and compete in a competitive global marketplace," said David J. Paterson, Verso's President and Chief Executive Officer. "We continue to face increased competition from electronic substitution for print and international producers, but as a larger, more efficient organization with a sustainable capital structure, we will be better positioned to compete effectively and deliver solid results despite the industry's continuing challenges. Furthermore, we believe the transaction provides stakeholders in both companies with meaningful, compelling value." George F. Martin, President and Chief Executive Officer of NewPage, commented, "We believe this agreement with Verso represents the best way forward for our stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Preceptor Newsletter
    Preceptor Newsletter Summer 2006 Volume 1, Issue 2 New and Noteworthy Mark Your Calendar WVU School of Pharmacy Dean to Please mark your calendar for the following upcoming dates Retire and deadlines: APPE After ten years as dean of the West • Block 4: August 21, 2006 – September 15, 2006 Virginia University School of Pharmacy, • Student Assessment Forms from Block 4 are due on or Dr. George Spratto retired in August before September 22, 2006 2006. Spratto served as dean since June • Block 5: September 18, 2006 – October 13, 2006 1995. • Student Assessment Forms from Block 5 are due on or before October 20, 2006 • Block 6: October 16, 2006 – November 10, 2006 “Dr. Spratto will be missed not just by • Student Assessment Forms from Block 6 are due on or the School of Pharmacy, but by the entire University,” before November 17, 2006 said Robert M. D’Alessandri, M.D., WVU’s vice • Block 7: November 13, 2006 – December 15, 2006 president for health sciences. He has provided informed • Student Assessment Forms from Block 7 are due on or leadership that has benefited our students, our institution before December 22, 2006 and the state.” Changes Announced for the Community IPPE During Spratto’s tenure, the School of Pharmacy enjoyed Program growth in student numbers, as well as in the areas of increased private research funding. P1 students now participate in pharmacy practice experiences in the community setting. The program was “We have seen a tremendous increase in the student implemented in the fall 2005. We have listened to preceptors applicant pool over the past few years” said Spratto.
    [Show full text]
  • The Benefits of Acid Mine Drainage Remediation on the North Branch
    The Benefits of Acid Mine Drainage INTE Remediation on the North Branch Potomac River Evan Hansen Alan Collins Sera Zegre Anne Hereford Downstream Strategies 219 Wall Street Morgantown, WV 26505 www.downstreamstrategies.com Prepared for: Maryland State Water Quality Advisory Committee Garrett County, Maryland Economic Development Office th 203 S. 4 Street, Room 208 Oakland, MD 21550 December 1, 2010 The Benefits of Acid Mine Drainage Remediation on the North Branch Potomac River Evan Hansen, Alan Collins, Sera Zegre, Anne Hereford ABOUT THE AUTHORS Evan Hansen, M.S., Principal, Water Program, Downstream Strategies. Mr. Hansen founded Downstream Strategies and has 20 years of experience as an environmental consultant on water and energy issues for government agencies, nonprofit organizations, and private businesses. He has developed and applied computer models; provided training and expert testimony on issues related to environmental laws, policies, and permits; and led multi-disciplinary research teams. Alan Collins, Ph.D., Professor of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Chair of the Program in Agricultural and Resource Economics at West Virginia University. Dr. Collins has been at West Virginia University for over 20 years. He teaches courses in environmental and natural resource economics and his research areas include non-market valuation, water quality, animal manure management, and market-based incentives for environmental improvements. He has extensive experience with grant and contract research. Sera Zegre, M.S., Project Manager, Water Program, Downstream Strategies. Mrs. Zegre is a social scientist and project manager with a background in public land management, natural resource policy and law, and asset-based community planning. She works with government agencies, nonprofit organizations, and private businesses to research, plan, facilitate, and educate on issues related to communities and natural resources.
    [Show full text]