DOCSLIB.ORG

Taiwan Strait I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Taiwan Strait I TAIWAN STRAIT I: WHAT’S LEFT OF ‘ONE CHINA’? 6 June 2003 ICG Asia Report N° 53 Beijing/Taipei/Washington/Brussels TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...........................................................................................................i I. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 II. TAIWAN IN THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM: FROM WAR TO DETENTE ...4 A. FROM JAPANESE WAR PRIZE TO CHINESE CIVIL WAR BASTION: 1895-1949 ...................... 4 B. TAIWAN, CHINA AND THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY 1949-79 .................................. 5 C. TAIWAN STRAIT DÉTENTE 1979-1995 .............................................................................. 6 III. DÉTENTE BREACHED: TAIWAN’S GRADUAL MOVE AWAY FROM ‘ONE CHINA’...........................................................................................................................................9 A. ‘REVISED ONE CHINA’ POLICY: KMT 1991-1994 ............................................................10 B. ‘HISTORICAL ONE CHINA’ POLICY: KMT 1994-1999 .......................................................12 C. ‘FUTURE ONE CHINA’ POLICY? DPP 2000-2003..............................................................13 IV. CHINA’S RESPONSE: ‘ONE CHINA’ BY CONSENT OR COERCION.............17 A. COERCION: 1995 ............................................................................................................18 B. FURTHER COERCION: 1999..............................................................................................19 C. NEW DEMANDS: THE 2000 WHITE PAPER........................................................................20 1. What Constitutes Visible Progress? ......................................................................20 2. Is There a Deadline for Reunification?..................................................................20 D. CARROTS WITH THE STICK: 2000-2003...........................................................................21 V. U.S. POSITION: MAINTAIN ‘ONE CHINA’ BUT SUPPORT TAIWAN.............23 A. ACKNOWLEDGING CHINA’S POSITION: 1979-1995 ...........................................................23 B. NO TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE, BUT MORE SUPPORT : 1995-2000 ........................................25 C. ENDING STRATEGIC AMBIGUITY? 2001-2003...................................................................26 VI. OTHER INTERNATIONAL REACTIONS: ‘ONE CHINA’ YES, BUT… ........29 A. BILATERAL ADHERENCE TO ‘ONE CHINA’: FORMALISTIC, BUT EVOLVING......................30 B. MULTILATERAL RESPONSES: BEYOND ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL...................................33 VII. ‘ONE CHINA’ IN TAIWAN’S DOMESTIC POLITICS: WHAT ROOM FOR MANOEUVRE? ..........................................................................................................................35 A. NATIONAL IDENTITY.......................................................................................................36 B. PARTY POLITICS.............................................................................................................41 1. DPP Factionalism.................................................................................................42 2. Chen’s Leadership: Personal and Institutional Aspects ......................................44 3. Taiwan Solidarity Union ......................................................................................47 4. Shrinking, ‘Re-Mainlandised’ KMT .....................................................................48 5. People First Party .................................................................................................52 6. New Party ............................................................................................................53 C. NATIONALIST POLITICS AND THE ROOM FOR MANOEUVRE..............................................54 VIII. CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................55 APPENDICES A. MAP OF TAIWAN AND ADJACENT AREAS ......................................................................................56 B. LIST OF ACRONYMS.....................................................................................................................57 C. ABOUT THE INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP..................................................................................59 D. ICG REPORTS AND BRIEFING PAPERS...........................................................................................60 E. ICG BOARD MEMBERS ................................................................................................................66 ICG Asia Report N° 53 6 June 2003 TAIWAN STRAIT I: WHAT’S LEFT OF ‘ONE CHINA’? EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the last decade, Taiwan has moved slowly but 1995, also strengthened the new Taiwan identity and surely away from its commitment to the idea of ‘one weakened support for the ‘one China’ idea. China’, the proposition, long agreed on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, that Taiwan and the mainland are Now, in 2003, the position that Taiwan is already an parts of one country. This has led to steadily independent sovereign country is not one of a radical mounting tension between Taiwan and China, for political fringe, but a mainstream view. It was first both of whom the issue goes to the heart of their clearly asserted under a Kuomintang (KMT) sense of identity. While the prospect of an outbreak President, Lee Teng-hui, in 1994, following hints of a of war across the Strait remains distant, action is change of direction as early as 1991. The other main needed by all relevant parties to contain and reverse political party, the Democratic Progressive Party the situation. (DPP), whose leader, Chen Shui-bian, was elected President in 2000, is even more vigorous in its This report is a background study, describing how advocacy of Taiwan’s status as an independent the ‘one China’ formula has eroded and why this sovereign state. The only mainstream debate now in matters: it makes no specific recommendations Taiwan is about how to deal with the evident about the way ahead. But two companion reports contradiction between the old idea of ‘one China’, released simultaneously with it address in detail the still formally supported by the KMT, with the idea of risk of military confrontation and how this might be Taiwan as an independent sovereign state, now in contained, and the political and economic strategies fact supported by both the KMT and the DPP. by which a peaceful relationship might best be maintained in the short to medium term. What an As a result of this domestic evolution in Taiwan, the ultimate, next generation, political settlement might old ‘one China’ principle, though still the reference look like if peace can be sustained will be the subject point for international thinking about the China- of a later ICG report. Taiwan relationship, is no longer by itself an adequate device for containing the emerging new The changes that have occurred since the early 1990s tensions in cross-Strait relations. The Administration had their primary roots in Taiwan domestic of President Chen Shui-bian and his DPP are politics.With democratisation came the emergence of committed to the view that China needs to a ‘new Taiwanese’ identity – no longer mainlander acknowledge Taiwan’s status as an independent but not original Taiwanese either. Taiwan’s sovereign country. But because Chen and his impressive economic performance and integration ministers, like most voters in Taiwan, also know that with the international trading system became a they are walking a tightrope. he has committed his special source of pride to its people and began to government to the need to prevent a final show- have an impact on attitudes about its place in the down with China by avoiding highly provocative world. The sense was that these achievements had political acts such as conducting an independence- come in spite of the constraints imposed by China related referendum or changing the Constitution to and the international community in respect to the create a ‘Republic of Taiwan’. ‘one China’ principle. As a result, many Taiwanese resented China for imposing this international China has been very concerned about Taiwan’s straitjacket. China’s military threats, resuming in gradual move away from support for ‘one China’. In 1995 and 1996 Beijing used highly visible military Taiwan Strait I: What’s Left of ‘One China’? ICG Asia Report N°53, 6 June 2003 Page ii exercises to put pressure on Taiwan to return much promise for China. It had only been prepared unambiguously to its observance. Though there to live with the situation of Taiwan’s de facto seemed to be some relaxation of tension after that, independence on the basis that the de jure situation the problem never went away and in fact became – international recognition that Taiwan cannot be worse. When in 1999, Taiwan’s President Lee called independent – did not come under serious threat. the cross-Strait relationship a ‘special state to state After a decade of gradual change, the longstanding relationship’, China’s leaders felt that the country position that both sides supported ‘one China’ but may have come closer to war over Taiwan than at had differing interpretations of what it meant is any time for decades, and they let this be known. now on the point of final fragmentation. Domestic Recognising the gravity of the situation, they also political imperatives suggest Taiwan’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transnational Legal Responses to Illegal Trade in Human Beings
    Transnational Legal Responses to Illegal Trade in Human Beings Mohamed Y. Mattar SAIS Review, Volume 33, Number 1, Winter-Spring 2013, pp. 137-159 (Article) Published by The Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: 10.1353/sais.2013.0013 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/sais/summary/v033/33.1.mattar.html Access provided by Johns Hopkins University (11 Jul 2013 13:57 GMT) TRANSNATIONAL LEGAL RESPONSESSAIS TO IReviewLLEGAL vol. T XXXIIIRADE IN no. H 1UMAN (Winter–Spring BEINGS 2013)137 Transnational Legal Responses to Illegal Trade in Human Beings Mohamed Y. Mattar Human trafficking, whether for the purpose of sexual exploitation or forced labor or services, is a transnational crime that requires transnational responses. There are a variety of forms of cooperation that are imperative in combating the transnational crime of trafficking. This article will explore the complexity of human trafficking, examine international legal stan- dards of combatting human trafficking, and compare various methods of cooperation. This article will conclude by presenting a set of recommendations for the purpose of incorporating a transnational legal response in any comprehensive strategy to combat human trafficking. Introduction uman trafficking, whether for the purpose of sexual exploitation or Hforced labor or services, is a transnational crime1 that requires trans- national responses, including what this paper will refer to as the three EX’s: exchange of information among countries of origin, transit, and destination;
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan Independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010)
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010) Dalei Jie University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Asian Studies Commons, and the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Jie, Dalei, "The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010)" (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 524. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/524 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/524 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010) Abstract How to explain the rise and fall of the Taiwan independence policy? As the Taiwan Strait is still the only conceivable scenario where a major power war can break out and Taiwan's words and deeds can significantly affect the prospect of a cross-strait military conflict, ot answer this question is not just a scholarly inquiry. I define the aiwanT independence policy as internal political moves by the Taiwanese government to establish Taiwan as a separate and sovereign political entity on the world stage. Although two existing prevailing explanations--electoral politics and shifting identity--have some merits, they are inadequate to explain policy change over the past twenty years. Instead, I argue that there is strategic rationale for Taiwan to assert a separate sovereignty. Sovereignty assertions are attempts to substitute normative power--the international consensus on the sanctity of sovereignty--for a shortfall in military- economic-diplomatic assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript Prepared By
    THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION CENTER FOR NORTHEAST ASIAN POLICY STUDIES TAIWAN’S ECONOMY AND A U.S.-TAIWAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT The Brookings Institution Washington, DC February 6, 2007 Transcript prepared by ANDERSON COURT REPORTING 706 Duke Street, Suite 100 Alexandria, VA 22314 Phone (703) 519-7180 Fax (703) 519-7190 Keynote speech Dr. ShihYen-Shiang Political Deputy Minister, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taiwan Panel I: The state of Taiwan’s economy Moderator Dr. Richard Bush, Senior Fellow and CNAPS Director, The Brookings Institution The political economy of Taiwan Dr. Tun-Jen Cheng Class of 1935 Professor, College of William and Mary China’s role in Taiwan’s economy Mr. Paul S.P. Hsu Chairman and CEO, PHYCOS International Co., Ltd. Taiwan’s economic position and participation in East Asia Dr. Chen Pochih Chairman, Taiwan Think Tank Taiwan’s economic and trade relationship with the United States Mr. John C.C. Deng Deputy Representative, Taipei Cultural and Economic Representative Office Panel II: Toward a U.S.-Taiwan free trade agreement Moderator Mr. Rick Ruzicka Director, Trade and Commercial Programs, American Institute in Taiwan Political and economic effects of a U.S.-Taiwan FTA Mr. Rupert Hammond-Chambers President, U.S.-Taiwan Business Council The outlook for an FTA: a Taiwan perspective Dr. Mignonne Chan Professor, Yu Da College of Business The outlook for an FTA: a U.S. perspective Mr. Eric Altbach Deputy Assistant United States Trade Representative for China Affairs Office of the United States Trade Representative Taiwan’s Economy and a U.S.-Taiwan Free Trade Agreement 2 CNAPS Seminar February 6, 2007 DR.
    [Show full text]
  • Translation, Codification, and Transplantation of Foreign Laws in Taiwan
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UW Law Digital Commons (University of Washington) Washington International Law Journal Volume 25 Number 2 4-1-2016 Translation, Codification, and rT ansplantation of Foreign Laws in Taiwan Tay-sheng Wang Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wilj Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons Recommended Citation Tay-sheng Wang, Translation, Codification, and rT ansplantation of Foreign Laws in Taiwan, 25 Wash. L. Rev. 307 (2016). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wilj/vol25/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington International Law Journal by an authorized editor of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Compilation © 2016 Washington International Law Journal Association TRANSLATION, CODIFICATION, AND TRANSPLANTATION OF FOREIGN LAWS IN TAIWAN Tay-sheng Wang† Abstract: Taiwan is an excellent example for rethinking the significance of translation and codification of law in the process of transplantation of modern law in East Asian countries. Regardless of its strangeness to the general public, the translation of Western laws was always codified in Meiji Japan for the purpose of “receiving” modern law. Those Westernized Japanese legal codes also took effect in Taiwan during the later period of Japanese colonial rule, although Japanese colonialists initially applied Taiwanese customary law, created by Western legal terminology, to the Taiwanese to decrease their resistance to the new regime.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Nationalism in Millennial Japan
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 5-2010 Politics Shifts Right: The Rise of Nationalism in Millennial Japan Jordan Dickson College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the Asian Studies Commons Recommended Citation Dickson, Jordan, "Politics Shifts Right: The Rise of Nationalism in Millennial Japan" (2010). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 752. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/752 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Politics Shifts Right: The Rise of Nationalism in Millennial Japan A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelors of Arts in Global Studies from The College of William and Mary by Jordan Dickson Accepted for High Honors Professor Rachel DiNitto, Director Professor Hiroshi Kitamura Professor Eric Han 1 Introduction In the 1990s, Japan experienced a series of devastating internal political, economic and social problems that changed the landscape irrevocably. A sense of national panic and crisis was ignited in 1995 when Japan experienced the Great Hanshin earthquake and the Aum Shinrikyō attack, the notorious sarin gas attack in the Tokyo subway. These disasters came on the heels of economic collapse, and the nation seemed to be falling into a downward spiral. The Japanese lamented the decline of traditional values, social hegemony, political awareness and engagement.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Mediation in Taiwan: Legal Culture and the Process of Legal Modernization
    Civil Mediation in Taiwan: Legal Culture and the Process of Legal Modernization Yun-Hsien Diana Lin* The process of legal modernization in Taiwan began in 1895, when the Japanese colonial government first imposed westernized modern law on Taiwan. Before 1895, the code of imperial Ch’ing—deeply influenced by the Confucian legal culture which emphasized social harmony and was opposed to lawsuits—had been the state law for more than two centuries. A second major transition started in the 1920s, during which Taiwanese people gradually became accustomed to accessing modern courts for their civil disputes, and the number of civil lawsuits eventually surpassed that of cases under mediation. The positive attitude toward civil litigation continued after the Nationalist government retreated to Taiwan in 1949. As a historical coincidence, the Nationalists also applied German- and Japanese-style legal codes in Taiwan, including double tracks of town mediation and family court mediation. Besides addressing this “law- versus-custom” dichotomy, the following article concerns itself mainly with the continuing and ever-evolving process of dialectic and mutual resistance between the different legal orders. * Yun-Hsien Diana Lin is an Associate Professor at the Institute of Law for Science and Technology, National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan. The author received her J.S.D. and LL.M. degrees from the University of California, Berkeley, and a B.A. from National Taiwan University. This research was supported by the governmental grants of National Science Council, R.O.C. (No. 98-2410-H-007-041). An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2010 Inaugural East Asian Law and Society Conference at Hong Kong University and the 2009 World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy in Beijing, China.
    [Show full text]
  • The History Problem: the Politics of War
    History / Sociology SAITO … CONTINUED FROM FRONT FLAP … HIRO SAITO “Hiro Saito offers a timely and well-researched analysis of East Asia’s never-ending cycle of blame and denial, distortion and obfuscation concerning the region’s shared history of violence and destruction during the first half of the twentieth SEVENTY YEARS is practiced as a collective endeavor by both century. In The History Problem Saito smartly introduces the have passed since the end perpetrators and victims, Saito argues, a res- central ‘us-versus-them’ issues and confronts readers with the of the Asia-Pacific War, yet Japan remains olution of the history problem—and eventual multiple layers that bind the East Asian countries involved embroiled in controversy with its neighbors reconciliation—will finally become possible. to show how these problems are mutually constituted across over the war’s commemoration. Among the THE HISTORY PROBLEM THE HISTORY The History Problem examines a vast borders and generations. He argues that the inextricable many points of contention between Japan, knots that constrain these problems could be less like a hang- corpus of historical material in both English China, and South Korea are interpretations man’s noose and more of a supportive web if there were the and Japanese, offering provocative findings political will to determine the virtues of peaceful coexistence. of the Tokyo War Crimes Trial, apologies and that challenge orthodox explanations. Written Anything less, he explains, follows an increasingly perilous compensation for foreign victims of Japanese in clear and accessible prose, this uniquely path forward on which nationalist impulses are encouraged aggression, prime ministerial visits to the interdisciplinary book will appeal to sociol- to derail cosmopolitan efforts at engagement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School College of Communications the POLITICAL ECONOMY of the DIGITAL DIVIDE in T
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Communications THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF THE DIGITAL DIVIDE IN TAIWAN A Thesis in Mass Communications by Chen-Ling Hung © 2004 Chen-Ling Hung Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2004 The thesis of Chen-Ling Hung was reviewed and approved* by the following: Ronald V. Bettig Associate Professor of Communications Thesis Advisor Chair of Committee Dennis Davis Professor of Communications Richard Taylor Professor of Communications Chris Benner Assistant Professor of Geography John Nichols Professor of Communications Associate Dean for Research and Graduate Programs in Mass Communications *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT This study utilizes a political-economic perspective to analyze the digital divide. This approach corrects the ideological bias of neo-liberal research on the digital divide and its insufficiency of theoretical foundation and provides a framework for political- economic scholars to systematically explore this issue. Political-economic theory is useful for examining the digital divide for it provides a holistic analysis of existing relationships among wealth, power and knowledge. This theory provides a critical perspective on the operation of capitalism, arguing that the nature and development of capitalism is signified by the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few people who dominate policymaking and the distribution of resources, including new technology and information, thus strengthening existing disparities. The study employs four entry points including history, ownership, access and policy to analyze the digital divide from a global perspective while focusing on the case of Taiwan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Economy of U.S.-Taiwanese Trade and Other International Economic Relations
    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Trade and Protectionism, NBER-EASE Volume 2 Volume Author/Editor: Takatoshi Ito and Anne O. Krueger, editors Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-38668-6 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/ito_93-2 Conference Date: June 19-21, 1991 Publication Date: January 1993 Chapter Title: The Political Economy of U.S.-Taiwanese Trade and Other International Economic Relations Chapter Author: Robert E. Baldwin, Douglas Nelson Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c8079 Chapter pages in book: (p. 307 - 337) 11 The Political Economy of U. S.-Taiwanese Trade and Other International Economic Relations Robert E. Baldwin and Douglas Nelson In most systematic work by economists on the political economy of trade pol- icy, the primary causal mechanism is the competing demands for different trade policies by various domestic pressure groups, who are motivated by eco- nomic self-interest. I The supply side is modeled quite simply. Politicians also pursue their economic self-interest by seeking to be reelected and, conse- quently, supply the trade policies desired by the group or groups who, by providing votes and campaign contributions, give them the best opportunity for being reelected. This framework has led to a substantial body of theoreti- cal and empirical work that has significantly improved our understanding of trade policy. This model does, however, mainly emphasize the “demand’ side since the demands of pressure groups are weighted to determine the equilibrium level of protection. In the typical political economy model of economists, the sup- plying of particular forms of trade policy by politicians, bureaucrats, and, more generally, the state, as part of their efforts to promote such collective goals as national security, is ruled out.
    [Show full text]
  • The Launch of China's New National Appellate IP Court 中国特色的联 H
    A Federal Circuit with Chinese Characteristics? – The Launch of China’s New National Appellate IP Court 中国特色的联邦巡回上诉法院？ https://chinaipr.com/2019/01/04/a-federal-circuit-with-chinese-characteristics-the-launch-of-chinas- new-national-appellate-ip-court- %E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E7%89%B9%E8%89%B2%E7%9A%84%E8%81%94%E9%82%A6%E5%B7% A1/ On December 27, 2018, the Supreme People’s Court released the Provisions on Certain Issues of the IP Court (the “Provisions”), and the Standing Committee of the NPC announced a first round name list of judges of the new IP court. These decisions follow an earlier announcement by the NPC Standing Committee on October 26, 2018 authorizing the establishing of this new division of the SPC (officially translated as IP Court of the Supreme Court of SPCIP, with the Chinese name 最高人民法 院知识产权法庭). There were also indications that such a court was in the works that were previously reported in this blog in 2017. The newly established IP Court is intended to function very similarly to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, with a national jurisdiction over technical IP cases as well as appeals of patent and trademark validity decisions. This is a much awaited, historic and potentially disruptive breakthrough in the China IP litigation system, that has been a focus of much discussion between US and Chinese experts over 20 or more years, notably between the SPC and former CAFC Chief Judge Rader, former USPTO Director Kappos ， and others (including the author/owner of this blog).
    [Show full text]
  • Progress and Prospects of Development of Peaceful Cross-Strait Relations
    11th Annual Conference on “The Taiwan Issue in China-Europe Relations” Shanghai, China September 14-16, 2014 A workshop jointly organised by the German Institute for International and Security Affairs / Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), Berlin and the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (SIIS), Shanghai. With friendly support of the Europe China Research and Advice Network (ECRAN). Discussion Paper Do not cite or quote without author’s permission Progress and Prospects of Development of Peaceful Cross-Strait Relations Yan Anlin Shanghai Institutes for International Studies Progress and Prospects of Development of Peaceful Cross-Strait Relations Yan Anlin More than six years have passed since the mainland and Taiwan took a crucial step in 2008 towards the development of peaceful relations. It is worth reflecting upon the progress in their relations since then, as well as the prospects of consolidating and deepening the relations in the future in the face of the new challenges and opportunities. 1. Positive changes for the development of peaceful cross-strait relations Over the past six years since May 2008, the mainland and Taiwan have made substantial progress in developing peaceful relations in the following four areas: Peaceful development has gained increasing momentum in cross-strait relations. The balance of power has apparently tilted towards the mainland, and this trend will continue for a long time. The mainland not only surpasses Taiwan in size, but has also outpaced the island in economic growth and global influence. With its growing strengths, the mainland has gradually assumed the leading role in cross-strait relations, whereas Taiwan has not found a way to stem its decline, which was publicly acknowledged by Su Chi, a key member of Ma Ying-jeou’s brain trust.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taiwan Issue in China-Europe Relations” Shanghai, China September 21-22, 2015
    12th Annual Conference on “The Taiwan Issue in China-Europe Relations” Shanghai, China September 21-22, 2015 A workshop jointly organised by the German Institute for International and Security Affairs / Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), Berlin and the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (SIIS), Shanghai. With friendly support of the Friedrich-Ebert- Stiftung (Shanghai Office). Discussion Paper Do not cite or quote without author’s permission New Characteristics of Future Cross-Straits Relations and New Challenges Hu Lingwei Shanghai East Asia Institute New Characteristics of Future Cross-Straits Relations and New Challenges Hu Lingwei In recent years, as seen from the course of observing the Taiwan Straits’ situation, on the one hand, social activities in Taiwan were very active, and many people, especially the young generation, expressed opinions on some topics, and actively participated in social and political life, not only impacting Taiwan’s political situation, but also exerting profound influence on cross-Straits relations; on the other hand, under the joint influence of the mainland, Taiwan and international factors, the cross-Straits relations and Taiwan Straits’ situation maintained a steady trend of development. Through analyzing and studying the current and future cross-Straits relations, we can see that though cross-Straits relations have encountered some new complicated situations emerging in Taiwan’s society, overall cross-Straits relations have maintained the momentum of steady development and shown new characteristics. In view of the new characteristics manifested by cross-Straits relations, actively and properly handling new problems facing future cross-Straits relations is conducive to promoting and maintaining the trend of steady development of cross-Straits relations.
    [Show full text]