DOCSLIB.ORG

THE IMPACTS of WHITE-TAILED DEER (Odocoileus Virginianus) HERBIVORY on the FORAGE QUALITY of FOREST VEGETATION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE IMPACTS of WHITE-TAILED DEER (Odocoileus Virginianus) HERBIVORY on the FORAGE QUALITY of FOREST VEGETATION THE IMPACTS OF WHITE-TAILED DEER (Odocoileus virginianus) HERBIVORY ON THE FORAGE QUALITY OF FOREST VEGETATION A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science By JONATHAN DAVID BECKER B.S., Cedarville University, 2012 2017 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL April 28, 2017 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Jonathan David Becker ENTITILED The impacts of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) herbivory on the forage quality of forest vegetation BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science. _________________________________ Thomas P. Rooney, Ph.D. Thesis Director _________________________________ David Goldstein, Ph.D. Chair, Department of Biological Sciences College of Science and Mathematics Committee on Final Examination _________________________________ Thomas P. Rooney, Ph.D. _________________________________ Don Cipollini, Ph.D. _______________________________ Yvonne M. Vadeboncoeur, Ph.D. ________________________________ Robert E.W. Fyffe, Ph.D. Vice President for Research and Dean of the Graduate School ABSTRACT Becker, Jonathan David. M.S. Department of Biological Sciences, Wright State University, 2017. The impacts of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) herbivory on the forage quality of forest vegetation. White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) are abundant across North America. Deer impact ecosystems, both directly and indirectly. These impacts are driven by the foraging preferences of deer. The energy, protein, mineral, fiber, and secondary metabolite content of plants are important factors that inform the selective herbivory of deer. I examined the interactions between forage quality and deer impacts in northern Wisconsin using deer exclosures. I examined the forage quality of four focal species (Acer saccharum, Maianthemum canadense, Dryopteris intermedia and Carex pensylvanica) in both control and exclosure plots. Forage quality parameters measured were energy, protein, ash, phosphorus, silica, fiber, and saponins. I found that deer herbivory did not uniformly decrease the forage quality within individual species. This study provides preliminary support for a predicted increase in low forage quality plants in response to heavy deer herbivory. Further research is necessary to support this trend, including a focus on defensive secondary metabolites. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 History of deer in North America ................................................................................... 1 Deer impacts on ecosystems ........................................................................................... 2 Direct impacts .............................................................................................................. 2 Indirect impacts ........................................................................................................... 4 Deer impacts on humans ................................................................................................. 6 Selective browsing behavior of deer ............................................................................... 6 Profile of preferred forage ............................................................................................... 7 Energy .......................................................................................................................... 7 Protein .......................................................................................................................... 7 Ash ............................................................................................................................... 8 Phosphorus................................................................................................................... 8 Silica ............................................................................................................................ 8 Fiber ............................................................................................................................. 9 Secondary metabolites ................................................................................................. 9 Saponins..................................................................................................................... 10 Nutritional ecology at a landscape scale ....................................................................... 11 Research questions ........................................................................................................ 11 METHODS ....................................................................................................................... 13 Study site ....................................................................................................................... 13 Collection techniques .................................................................................................... 14 Energy ........................................................................................................................... 14 Protein ........................................................................................................................... 15 Ash ................................................................................................................................ 16 Phosphorus .................................................................................................................... 17 Silica .............................................................................................................................. 18 Fiber .............................................................................................................................. 19 iv Saponins ........................................................................................................................ 19 Maianthemum canadense growth experiment............................................................... 21 Statistical analysis ......................................................................................................... 22 RESULTS ......................................................................................................................... 22 Energy ........................................................................................................................... 22 Protein ........................................................................................................................... 23 Ash ................................................................................................................................ 24 Phosphorus .................................................................................................................... 24 Silica .............................................................................................................................. 25 Fiber .............................................................................................................................. 25 Saponin .......................................................................................................................... 26 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................... 35 Deer browsing impacts on forage quality ..................................................................... 35 Characteristics of preferred forages .............................................................................. 39 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 43 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Energy................................................................................................................ 27 Figure 2. Protein................................................................................................................ 28 Figure 3. Ash ..................................................................................................................... 29 Figure 4. Phosphorus ........................................................................................................ 30 Figure 5. Silica .................................................................................................................. 31 Figure 6. ADF ................................................................................................................... 32 Figure 7. NDF ................................................................................................................... 33 Figure 8. Saponin .............................................................................................................. 34 vi INTRODUCTION History of deer in North America White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus, hereafter “deer”) were abundant (23- 34 million) in North America prior to European settlement. The deer population was severely reduced during 1850-1900 to 300,000 – 500,000 individuals. Unregulated market hunting was largely responsible for this reduction in population. At this time, state regulations on deer harvest were not strictly enforced and were ultimately unsuccessful in maintaining a stable population of deer. Eventually, the scarcity of deer reduced the importance of deer products in the marketplace.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Checklist of Common Native Plants the Diversity of Acadia National Park Is Refl Ected in Its Plant Life; More Than 1,100 Plant Species Are Found Here
    National Park Service Acadia U.S. Department of the Interior Acadia National Park Checklist of Common Native Plants The diversity of Acadia National Park is refl ected in its plant life; more than 1,100 plant species are found here. This checklist groups the park’s most common plants into the communities where they are typically found. The plant’s growth form is indicated by “t” for trees and “s” for shrubs. To identify unfamiliar plants, consult a fi eld guide or visit the Wild Gardens of Acadia at Sieur de Monts Spring, where more than 400 plants are labeled and displayed in their habitats. All plants within Acadia National Park are protected. Please help protect the park’s fragile beauty by leaving plants in the condition that you fi nd them. Deciduous Woods ash, white t Fraxinus americana maple, mountain t Acer spicatum aspen, big-toothed t Populus grandidentata maple, red t Acer rubrum aspen, trembling t Populus tremuloides maple, striped t Acer pensylvanicum aster, large-leaved Aster macrophyllus maple, sugar t Acer saccharum beech, American t Fagus grandifolia mayfl ower, Canada Maianthemum canadense birch, paper t Betula papyrifera oak, red t Quercus rubra birch, yellow t Betula alleghaniesis pine, white t Pinus strobus blueberry, low sweet s Vaccinium angustifolium pyrola, round-leaved Pyrola americana bunchberry Cornus canadensis sarsaparilla, wild Aralia nudicaulis bush-honeysuckle s Diervilla lonicera saxifrage, early Saxifraga virginiensis cherry, pin t Prunus pensylvanica shadbush or serviceberry s,t Amelanchier spp. cherry, choke t Prunus virginiana Solomon’s seal, false Maianthemum racemosum elder, red-berried or s Sambucus racemosa ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Polygonatum Multiflorum (Asparagaceae)
    Ann. Bot. Fennici 49: 217–228 ISSN 0003-3847 (print) ISSN 1797-2442 (online) Helsinki 31 August 2012 © Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 2012 Generative reproduction dynamics in populations of the perennial herb Polygonatum multiflorum (Asparagaceae) Igor Kosiński Department of Biology and Pharmaceutical Botany, Medical University of Gdańsk, Al. Gen. J. Hallera 107, PL-80-416 Gdańsk, Poland (e-mail: [email protected]) Received 8 Jun 2011, final version received 27 Mar. 2012, accepted 27 Mar. 2012 Kosiński, I. 2012: Generative reproduction dynamics in populations of the perennial herb Polygo- natum multiflorum (Asparagaceae). — Ann. Bot. Fennici 49: 217–228. Generative reproduction traits of the perennial Polygonatum multiflorum (Aspara- gaceae) were studied in seven populations in 2000–2010. The frequencies of typical hermaphrodite flowers and functionally male flowers with short or atrophied car- pels were 76%, 17% and 7%, respectively. Most hermaphrodite flowers occurred in the lower and middle positions on the ramets. The final fruit/flower ratio per ramet amounted to 25% and its variation was higher among populations than among years. The initial fruit set was on an average twice as high as the final fruit set. The mean number of seeds per fruit was 3.2, and the distribution was skewed to the right. At the inter-population level, the seed number and mass of fruits were negatively correlated with each other. Seed size/number trade off was significant for shoots and for fruits. The seedling emergence was 65%–82% and it was positively correlated with the seed size as well as the survival of seedlings.
    [Show full text]
  • Watsonia 8 (1971) 293-301
    Watsonia, 8, 293-301 (1971). 293 Short Notes 69. RHYNCHOSINAPIS - The Worcestershire records. From 1873 to 1876 a species first identified as Brassica cheiranthos Vill. was found 'in considerable plenty' at Sutton Common, Kidderminster by J. Fraser, J. H. Thompson and W. Mathews (Rea 1897). The plant was later identified by Mathews (1899) as B. monensis L. (Rhynchosinapis monensis (L.) Dandy). The record and identification were accepted by Amphlett & Rea (1909), Druce (1932) and Perring & Walters (1962). In 1965 I examined the material in the herbarium of the Hastings Museum, Worcester (WOS). The specimens, collected at Sutton Common in June and July 1873, October 1874 and June 1876, were in a poor state of preservation, but the following character­ istics could be ascertained: Stems branched, with a few simple setae on their lower parts; simple hairs present on petioles and basal leaves and on the sepals, which slightly exceed the pedicels in length; cauline leaves with segments narrower than those of rosette leaves; siliquae glabrous, 6,5-9,5 cm long, with beaks 11 mm without seeds. The specimens are, therefore, of the alien species Rhynchosinapis cheiranthos (VilI.) Dandy and not of the endemic R. monensis. It has already been pointed out (Kiernan 1966) that the material bears no resemblance to Sisymbrium orientale L. (S. columnae Jacq.), to which species it was referred by Rea (1921). In view of these findings, it is possible that other inland records for R. monensis might be erroneous. REFERENCES AMPHLETT, J. & REA, C. (1909). The Botany of Worcestershire. Birmingham. DRUCE, G. C. (1932). The CornUal Flora of the British Isles.
    [Show full text]
  • NJ Native Plants - USDA
    NJ Native Plants - USDA Scientific Name Common Name N/I Family Category National Wetland Indicator Status Thermopsis villosa Aaron's rod N Fabaceae Dicot Rubus depavitus Aberdeen dewberry N Rosaceae Dicot Artemisia absinthium absinthium I Asteraceae Dicot Aplectrum hyemale Adam and Eve N Orchidaceae Monocot FAC-, FACW Yucca filamentosa Adam's needle N Agavaceae Monocot Gentianella quinquefolia agueweed N Gentianaceae Dicot FAC, FACW- Rhamnus alnifolia alderleaf buckthorn N Rhamnaceae Dicot FACU, OBL Medicago sativa alfalfa I Fabaceae Dicot Ranunculus cymbalaria alkali buttercup N Ranunculaceae Dicot OBL Rubus allegheniensis Allegheny blackberry N Rosaceae Dicot UPL, FACW Hieracium paniculatum Allegheny hawkweed N Asteraceae Dicot Mimulus ringens Allegheny monkeyflower N Scrophulariaceae Dicot OBL Ranunculus allegheniensis Allegheny Mountain buttercup N Ranunculaceae Dicot FACU, FAC Prunus alleghaniensis Allegheny plum N Rosaceae Dicot UPL, NI Amelanchier laevis Allegheny serviceberry N Rosaceae Dicot Hylotelephium telephioides Allegheny stonecrop N Crassulaceae Dicot Adlumia fungosa allegheny vine N Fumariaceae Dicot Centaurea transalpina alpine knapweed N Asteraceae Dicot Potamogeton alpinus alpine pondweed N Potamogetonaceae Monocot OBL Viola labradorica alpine violet N Violaceae Dicot FAC Trifolium hybridum alsike clover I Fabaceae Dicot FACU-, FAC Cornus alternifolia alternateleaf dogwood N Cornaceae Dicot Strophostyles helvola amberique-bean N Fabaceae Dicot Puccinellia americana American alkaligrass N Poaceae Monocot Heuchera americana
    [Show full text]
  • Liliaceae Lily Family
    Liliaceae lily family While there is much compelling evidence available to divide this polyphyletic family into as many as 25 families, the older classification sensu Cronquist is retained here. Page | 1222 Many are familiar as garden ornamentals and food plants such as onion, garlic, tulip and lily. The flowers are showy and mostly regular, three-merous and with a superior ovary. Key to genera A. Leaves mostly basal. B B. Flowers orange; 8–11cm long. Hemerocallis bb. Flowers not orange, much smaller. C C. Flowers solitary. Erythronium cc. Flowers several to many. D D. Leaves linear, or, absent at flowering time. E E. Flowers in an umbel, terminal, numerous; leaves Allium absent. ee. Flowers in an open cluster, or dense raceme. F F. Leaves with white stripe on midrib; flowers Ornithogalum white, 2–8 on long peduncles. ff. Leaves green; flowers greenish, in dense Triantha racemes on very short peduncles. dd. Leaves oval to elliptic, present at flowering. G G. Flowers in an umbel, 3–6, yellow. Clintonia gg. Flowers in a one-sided raceme, white. Convallaria aa. Leaves mostly cauline. H H. Leaves in one or more whorls. I I. Leaves in numerous whorls; flowers >4cm in diameter. Lilium ii. Leaves in 1–2 whorls; flowers much smaller. J J. Leaves 3 in a single whorl; flowers white or purple. Trillium jj. Leaves in 2 whorls, or 5–9 leaves; flowers yellow, small. Medeola hh. Leaves alternate. K K. Flowers numerous in a terminal inflorescence. L L. Plants delicate, glabrous; leaves 1–2 petiolate. Maianthemum ll. Plant coarse, robust; stems pubescent; leaves many, clasping Veratrum stem.
    [Show full text]
  • And Natural Community Restoration
    RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LANDSCAPING AND NATURAL COMMUNITY RESTORATION Natural Heritage Conservation Program Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources P.O. Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707 August 2016, PUB-NH-936 Visit us online at dnr.wi.gov search “ER” Table of Contents Title ..……………………………………………………….……......………..… 1 Southern Forests on Dry Soils ...................................................... 22 - 24 Table of Contents ...……………………………………….….....………...….. 2 Core Species .............................................................................. 22 Background and How to Use the Plant Lists ………….……..………….….. 3 Satellite Species ......................................................................... 23 Plant List and Natural Community Descriptions .…………...…………….... 4 Shrub and Additional Satellite Species ....................................... 24 Glossary ..................................................................................................... 5 Tree Species ............................................................................... 24 Key to Symbols, Soil Texture and Moisture Figures .................................. 6 Northern Forests on Rich Soils ..................................................... 25 - 27 Prairies on Rich Soils ………………………………….…..….……....... 7 - 9 Core Species .............................................................................. 25 Core Species ...……………………………….…..…….………........ 7 Satellite Species ......................................................................... 26 Satellite Species
    [Show full text]
  • IAPT/IOPB Chromosome Data 22 TAXON 65 (5) • October 2016: 1200–1207
    Marhold & Kučera (eds.) • IAPT/IOPB chromosome data 22 TAXON 65 (5) • October 2016: 1200–1207 IOPB COLUMN Edited by Karol Marhold & Ilse Breitwieser IAPT/IOPB chromosome data 22 Edited by Karol Marhold & Jaromír Kučera DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.12705/655.40 Tatyana V. An’kova,1* Maria N. Lomonosova1 & BORAGINACEAE Victor V. Chepinoga2,3 Lappula anisacantha (Turcz. ex Bunge) Gürke, 2n = 12; Russia, Sakha (Yakutia) Republic, ML & EN 879 (NS). 1 Central Siberian Botanical Garden SB RAS, Zolotodolinskaya Str. 101, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia CAPRIFOLIACEAE 2 The V.B. Sochava Institute of Geography SB RAS, Ulan- Patrinia rupestris (Pall.) Dufr., 2n = 22; Russia, Sakha (Yakutia) Batorskaya Str. 1, 664033 Irkutsk, Russia Republic, ML & EN 849b (NS). 3 Irkutsk State University, Karl Marx Str. 1, 664003 Irkutsk, Russia GENTIANACEAE * Author for correspondence: [email protected] Halenia corniculata (L.) Cornaz, 2n = 22; Russia, Republic of Buryatia, E. Zolotovskaya & E. Gladkikh C168 (IRKU). All materials CHN; collectors: EN = E.G. Nikolin, ML = M.N. Lomonosova. GERANIACEAE Geranium sibiricum L., 2n = 28; Russia, Sakha (Yakutia) Republic, The reported study was partially supported by Russian Founda- ML & EN 858 (NS). tion for Basic Research (RFBR), project no. 16-05-00783. PLANTAGINACEAE ALLIACEAE Linaria acutiloba Fisch. ex Rchb., 2n = 12; Russia, Krasnoyarskii Allium ramosum L., 2n = 32; Russia, Sakha (Yakutia) Republic, ML Krai, ML 1141h (NS). & EN 831a (NS). Linaria genistifolia (L.) Mill., 2n = 12; Russia, Samarskaya Oblast’, Allium splendens Willd. ex Schult. & Schult.f., 2n = 16; Russia, Sakha ML 1068 (NS). (Yakutia) Republic, ML & EN 798 (NS). Plantago canescens Adams, 2n = 12; Russia, Sakha (Yakutia) Repub- lic, ML & EN 798 (NS).
    [Show full text]
  • Asparagaceae Key & Chart
    Asparagaceae (Asparagus Family) Key Key to species in Newfoundland and Labrador © Flora of Newfoundland and Labrador (2019) 1a. Plants erect, with 1–4 leaves (usually 2–3 on fertile stems); stems straight; leaves alternate; stems, leaves, and inflorescence axis and pedicels glabrous. .............................. 2 1b. Plants erect to arching, with 5–12+ leaves on fertile stems; stems slightly zig-zag; leaves alternate, usually 2-ranked; lower leaf surfaces, and inflorescence axis and pedicles finely or minutely pubescent. ......................................................................................................... 3 2a. Flowers 2-merous; tepals 4, shorter than the 4 stamens; the single pistil 2- carpellate; leaves ovate to lanceolate, cordate to sessile. ............................................ ....................................................... Maianthemum canadense (wild lily-of-the-valley) 2b. Flowers 3-merous; tepals 6, longer than the 6 stamens; the single pistil 3-carpellate; leaves elliptic to oblanceolate, 5–12 cm long. ............................................................... ............................................ Maianthemum trifolium (threeleaf false Solomon’s seal) 3a. Stems 5–10 dm tall, arching; leaves 5–12, short-petiolate; blades elliptic-oblong, 10–25 cm long; leaves oriented parallel to the stem axis and ± parallel to the ground; inflorescence a many-flowered panicle, 7–17 cm long; flowers very small, short- pedicelled, tepals 1–3 mm long; rare in rich forested habitats in western Newfoundland. ................................................ Maianthemum racemosum (feathery false Solomon’s seal) 3b. Stems 0.5–2 dm tall, erect to arching; leaves 8–11, bases sheathing to sessile and slightly clasping; blades elliptic, lanceolate, to oblanceolate, 5–12 cm long; leaves erect to ascending; inflorescence a small, few-flowered raceme, 2–4.5 cm long; flowers larger, long-pedicelled, tepals 4–6 mm long; plants fairly common in the appropriate habitat: common in dry sandy forested sites, coastal meadows, and sand dunes.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Wild Food Plants in Historical Võromaa and Setomaa, Present-Day Estonia
    foods Article Devil Is in the Details: Use of Wild Food Plants in Historical Võromaa and Setomaa, Present-Day Estonia Raivo Kalle 1,*, Renata Sõukand 2,* and Andrea Pieroni 1 1 University of Gastronomic Sciences, Piazza Vittorio Emanuele 9, 12042 Pollenzo, Italy; [email protected] 2 DAIS-Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Via Torino 155, 30172 Mestre, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] (R.K.); [email protected] (R.S.) Received: 5 April 2020; Accepted: 21 April 2020; Published: 4 May 2020 Abstract: Biodiversity needs to be preserved to ensure food security. Border zones create high but vulnerable biocultural diversity. Through reviewing scattered historical data and documenting the current use of wild food plants among people currently living in historical Setomaa and Võromaa parishes, we aimed to identify cross-cultural differences and diachronic changes as well as the role borders have played on the local use of wild plants. The Seto have still preserved their distinctive features either by consciously opposing others or by maintaining more historical plant uses. People historically living in Setomaa and Võromaa parishes have already associated the eating of wild plants with famine food in the early 20th century, yet it was stressed more now by the Seto than by Estonians. Loss of Pechory as the center of attraction in the region when the border was closed in the early 1990s brought about a decline in the exchange of knowledge as well as commercial activities around wild food plants. National support for businesses in the area today and the popularity of a healthy lifestyle have introduced new wild food plant applications and are helping to preserve local plant-specific uses in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • SPRING WILDFLOWERS of OHIO Field Guide DIVISION of WILDLIFE 2 INTRODUCTION This Booklet Is Produced by the ODNR Division of Wildlife As a Free Publication
    SPRING WILDFLOWERS OF OHIO field guide DIVISION OF WILDLIFE 2 INTRODUCTION This booklet is produced by the ODNR Division of Wildlife as a free publication. This booklet is not for resale. Any By Jim McCormac unauthorized reproduction is prohibited. All images within this booklet are copyrighted by the Division of Wild- life and it’s contributing artists and photographers. For additional information, please call 1-800-WILDLIFE. The Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR) has a long history of promoting wildflower conservation and appreciation. ODNR’s landholdings include 21 state forests, 136 state nature preserves, 74 state parks, and 117 wildlife HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE areas. Collectively, these sites total nearly 600,000 acres Bloom Calendar Scientific Name (Scientific Name Pronunciation) Scientific Name and harbor some of the richest wildflower communities in MID MAR - MID APR Definition BLOOM: FEB MAR APR MAY JUN Ohio. In August of 1990, ODNR Division of Natural Areas and Sanguinaria canadensis (San-gwin-ar-ee-ah • can-ah-den-sis) Sanguinaria = blood, or bleeding • canadensis = of Canada Preserves (DNAP), published a wonderful publication entitled Common Name Bloodroot Ohio Wildflowers, with the tagline “Let Them Live in Your Eye Family Name POPPY FAMILY (Papaveraceae). 2 native Ohio species. DESCRIPTION: .CTIGUJQY[ƃQYGTYKVJPWOGTQWUYJKVGRGVCNU Not Die in Your Hand.” This booklet was authored by the GRJGOGTCNRGVCNUQHVGPHCNNKPIYKVJKPCFC[5KPINGNGCHGPYTCRU UVGOCVƃQYGTKPIVKOGGXGPVWCNN[GZRCPFUKPVQCNCTIGTQWPFGFNGCH YKVJNQDGFOCTIKPUCPFFGGRDCUCNUKPWU
    [Show full text]
  • 43. MAIANTHEMUM F. H. Wiggers, Prim. Fl. Holsat. 14. 1780, Nom. Cons
    Flora of China 24: 217–222. 2000. 43. MAIANTHEMUM F. H. Wiggers, Prim. Fl. Holsat. 14. 1780, nom. cons. 舞鹤草属 wu he cao shu Chen Xinqi (陈心启 Chen Sing-chi); Shoichi Kawano1 Oligobotrya Baker; Polygonastrum Moench; Smilacina Desfontaines; Tovaria Necker ex Baker (1875), not Ruiz & Pavón (1794); Vagnera Adanson. Herbs perennial, rhizomatous. Stems erect, simple. Leaves alternate, sessile or petiolate, usually elliptic to ovate, sometimes basal leaf solitary and early withered. Inflorescence a terminal raceme or panicle. Flowers bisexual or sometimes unisexual (when plants dioceous), small. Perianth segments 4 or 6, in 2 whorls, free or proximally ± connate, rarely forming a long tube. Stamens 4 or 6, inserted at base of perianth segments or adnate to perianth tube; filaments filiform; anthers dorsifixed. Ovary 2- or 3-loculed; ovules 1 or 2 per locule. Style columnar, relatively short; stigma entire or 2- or 3-lobed. Fruit a berry, globose or subglobose. Seeds 1–3, globose to ovoid. About 35 species: mainly in E Asia and North America, also in N Asia, Central America, and N Europe; 19 species (nine endemic) in China. Wu Zhengyi (editor’s note) believes that Smilacina would be better kept separate from Maianthemum on the basis of morphology and geographic distribution. 1a. Plants with a solitary, early-withered basal leaf, cauline leaves 2 or 3; perianth segments 4, in 2 whorls; stamens 4; ovary 2-loculed, ovules 2 per locule .............................................................................................................................. 1. M. bifolium 1b. Plants without basal leaf, cauline leaves more than 3; perianth segments 6; stamens 6; ovary 3-loculed, ovules 1 or 2 per locule.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report
    U.S. Geological Survey-National Park Service Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park, Maine Project Report Revised Edition – October 2003 Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U. S. Department of the Interior, U. S. Geological Survey. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park U.S. Geological Survey-National Park Service Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park, Maine Sara Lubinski and Kevin Hop U.S. Geological Survey Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center and Susan Gawler Maine Natural Areas Program This report produced by U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center 2630 Fanta Reed Road La Crosse, Wisconsin 54603 and Maine Natural Areas Program Department of Conservation 159 Hospital Street 93 State House Station Augusta, Maine 04333-0093 In conjunction with Mike Story (NPS Vegetation Mapping Coordinator) NPS, Natural Resources Information Division, Inventory and Monitoring Program Karl Brown (USGS Vegetation Mapping Coordinator) USGS, Center for Biological Informatics and Revised Edition - October 2003 USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park Contacts U.S. Department of Interior United States Geological Survey - Biological Resources Division Website: http://www.usgs.gov U.S. Geological Survey Center for Biological Informatics P.O. Box 25046 Building 810, Room 8000, MS-302 Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225-0046 Website: http://biology.usgs.gov/cbi Karl Brown USGS Program Coordinator - USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Phone: (303) 202-4240 E-mail: [email protected] Susan Stitt USGS Remote Sensing and Geospatial Technologies Specialist USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Phone: (303) 202-4234 E-mail: [email protected] Kevin Hop Principal Investigator U.S.
    [Show full text]