Academic Interventions in Northern Ireland Unionism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Academic Interventions in Northern Ireland Unionism JYVÄSKYLÄ STUDIES IN EDUCATION, PSYCHOLOGY AND SOCIAL RESEARCH 344 Jyrki Ruohomäki Could Do Better Academic Interventions in Northern Ireland Unionism JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO JYVÄSKYLÄ STUDIES IN EDUCATION, PSYCHOLOGY AND SOCIAL RESEARCH 344 Jyrki Ruohomäki "Could Do Better" Academic Interventions in Northern Ireland Unionism Esitetään Jyväskylän yliopiston yhteiskuntatieteellisen tiedekunnan suostumuksella julkisesti tarkastettavaksi yliopiston päärakennuksen juhlasalissa C5 lokakuun 17. päivänä 2008 kello 12. Academic dissertation to be publicly discussed, by permission of the Faculty of Social Sciences of the University of Jyväskylä, in Auditorium C5, on October 17, 2008 at 12 o'clock noon. UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ JYVÄSKYLÄ 2008 "Could Do Better" Academic Interventions in Northern Ireland Unionism JYVÄSKYLÄ STUDIES IN EDUCATION, PSYCHOLOGY AND SOCIAL RESEARCH 344 Jyrki Ruohomäki "Could Do Better" Academic Interventions in Northern Ireland Unionism UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ JYVÄSKYLÄ 2008 Editors Jussi Kotkavirta Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy Pekka Olsbo, Marja-Leena Tynkkynen Publishing Unit, University Library of Jyväskylä Cover photo: Unionist mass demonstration against the Anglo-Irish Agreement 23.11.1985. Copyright by CAIN (cain.ulst.ac.uk) URN:ISBN:978-951-39-3360-9 ISBN 978-951-39-3360-9 (PDF) ISBN 978-951-39-3349-4 (nid.) ISSN 0075-4625 Copyright ©2008 , by University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylä University Printing House, Jyväskylä 2008 ABSTRACT Ruohomäki, Jyrki “Could do Better”. Academic Interventions in Northern Ireland Unionism. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto, 2008, 238 p. (Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research ISSN 0075-4625; 344) ISBN 978-951-39-3360-9 (PDF), 978-951-39-3349-4 (nid.) Summary Diss. This thesis starts with the problem of the role of the academics, scholars and intellectuals in Northern Ireland: What is the role of an academic, as a representative of a non-partisan or politically non-committed science in Northern Ireland, in which the political division between the mutually hostile political ideas of Ulster unionism and Northern Ireland nationalism literally penetrate almost all areas and discussions in the society? My thesis is that this political separation into two main agendas also must be reflected in the study of the Northern Ireland conflict, and secondly that the scholars themselves must also have a political aspect present in their activities as scientists. The analysis is limited to the role of the scholars and intellectuals in Northern Ireland unionism, and the same phenomena in reference to Irish nationalism is only briefly touched. By science this study refers namely to social and humanist sciences. As a theoretical framework I use predominately Max Weber and his ideas of the differences and similarities that science and politics and a scientist and a politician have. Weber is also read through the interpretations presented particularly by Kari Palonen. I will also link this study to a wider debate on intellectuals. The primary material that has been analysed consists of texts produced by scholars and intellectuals, such as textbooks and articles, but also a more combatant, as politically more committed material by the same people, such as manifestoes and other non-academic writings. The method of the study is textual analysis, manifested in the application of a reading strategy which searches for the political in a text that is often written as apolitical. The time frame of the study goes from the early 1970’s and the start of the Northern Ireland “troubles” to the Belfast Agreement of 1998. The main interest is, however, concentrated on the 1985-1998 era. Keywords: Ulster unionism, Northern Ireland, politics of science, conflict studies Author’s address Jyrki Ruohomäki Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy / political science P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä Supervisors Senior Assistant Klaus Sondermann Dr. Soc.Sc, Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy /political science P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä Professor Kari Palonen Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy / political science P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä Reviewers Matti Hyvärinen Dr. Soc.Sc, Academy Research Fellow Department of Sociology and Social Psychology 33014 University of Tampere Anu Hirsiaho Dr. Soc.Sc, Postdoctoral Fellow Department of Women’s Studies 33014 University of Tampere Opponent Alan Finlayson PhD, Reader in Politics Department of Politics and International Relations Singleton Park University of Wales, Swansea Swansea SA2 8PP United Kingdom ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I wish to thank my two supervisors, senior assistant Klaus Sondermann and Professor Kari Palonen. From the University of Jyväskylä I want to thank particularly Professor Pekka Korhonen. In addition, I am thankful for all the unnamed colleagues and friends at the Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy who have provided me with the necessary intellectual support and general encouragement. I am also grateful to my two reviewers Academy fellow Matti Hyvärinen and Postdoctoral fellow Anu Hirsiaho for their valuable comments on the manuscript and Susanne Kalejaiye who helped me with my English. Ina Sondermann read the manuscript as an “interested outsider” providing many useful comments, for which I am grateful. From Northern Ireland I wish to thank especially Professors Shane O’Neill, Richard English and Graham Walker from Queen’s University, Belfast and Professors Arthur Aughey and Henry Patterson from University of Ulster. I am especially grateful to Mrs. Catherine Coll, the school manager for helping me in many ways to make the best out of my four month visit at the School of Politics in 2005-2006. I am also thankful to the PhD students at the School of Politics (QUB) who made me feel very welcome and offered some necessary distractions from academic work. In this respect I think warmly especially Darren McCauley and Richard Trail. The special collections staff at the library of Queen’s University as well as the people at the Linen Hall Library provided me with excellent and swift assistance. For financial support I wish to thank the University of Jyväskylä, the Academy of Finland, the Academy of Finland Centre of Excellence in Political Thought and Conceptual Change, and the Tampere Peace Research Institute. Finally, I would like to thank my friends, family and loved ones, especially my spouse Terhi, for their pivotal support in making this work possible. LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AIA Anglo-Irish Agreement. An agreement between the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland governments signed 15th November 1985. BICO British Irish Communist Organisation. A political group in the 1970’s based on accommodating the ideas of Marxism and Northern Ireland unionism. CEC Campaign for Equal Citizenship. A political campaign led by the Belfast barrister Robert McCartney from the mid 1980’s to the early 1990’s. DSD Downing Street Declaration. See JDP. DUP Democratic Unionist Party. Historically, and during the timeframe of this study, the smaller one of the two main unionist parties. The DUP is known of its religious bias in comparison to the other main unionist party, the UUP. The DUP was led by its founding member Dr. Ian Paisley 1971-2008 and currently by Peter Robinson. GFA Good Friday Agreement (officially known as the Belfast Agreement). An Agreement reached between the majority of the political parties in Northern Ireland 10th April 1998 to set up a devolution on a power sharing basis. Ended the era of the Northern Ireland governance through the Anglo-Irish Agreement institutions. IGC Intergovernmental Conference. A political institution set up in the Anglo-Irish Agreement between the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland governments to deal with political, security and legal matters and promote cross-border co-operation. Fiercely criticized by the unionists as an embryo for joint authority over Northern Ireland by the two governments. INLA Irish Nationalist Liberation Army. A Marxist Republican paramilitary group. (P)IRA (Provisional) Irish Republican Army. An armed wing of the Republican movement. JDP Joint Declaration on Peace (aka the Downing Street Declaration). Presented by the British and Irish governments on 15th December 1993 to give a blueprint of the contents of the future peace settlement in Northern Ireland. NIFR Northern Ireland Forum Report. The declaration of the “pan nationalist” Northern Ireland forum in 1984 in which all nationalist parties “rejecting violence” (this wording excluded Sinn Féin) took part. SDLP Social Democratic and Labour Party. The constitutional and a more moderate, nationalist party in Northern Ireland. Led by its founding member John Hume 1979-2001 and currently by Mark Durkan. SF Sinn Féin (ourselves alone). The Republican political party, with the political goal of a united Ireland. Commonly understood as the political wing of the IRA. Led by Gerry Adams from 1983. UDA Ulster Defence Association. A loyalist (refers commonly to the militant unionism) paramilitary group, founded in 1971. Sometimes uses the name Ulster Freedom Fighters (UFF) as its nom de guerre. UFF Ulster Freedom Fighters. See UDA. UKUP United Kingdom Unionist Party. A relatively small “right wing” unionist party founded in 1995 and led by Robert McCartney. UPRG Ulster Political Research Group. A think tank of the paramilitary UDA. UUC Ulster Unionist Council. Political organisation formed in 1905 to fight against the Irish
Recommended publications
  • The High Tide of UK Anti-Revisionism: a History
    1 HIGH TIDE Reg’s Working Class Party Throughout its history there were only a few times when the organisational skeleton of a national ML force was in the making: McCreery in the initial break from the CPGB led the first occasion. With the demise of the CDRCU, it was the launch of the CPB (ML), led by former Communist Party Executive member, Reg Birch that saw the beginnings of a national ML force unchallenged for almost a decade until the late 1970s emergence of the rejuvenated and "bolshevised" Revolutionary Communist League. For the first half of the decade, it was the CPB (ML) that seemed the most promising organisation to make a political break through. The project initiated by Reg Birch could draw upon a lot of goodwill. Birch, with a pedigree of both trade union and communist activity, offered the chance of gathering the best forces of the ML movement around the standard he had raised. Those who were already disgusted with the inward‐looking squabbling, that seemed to dominate the activities of some groups, look forward to the opportunity for serious political work in trade unions and campaigns directed at winning working class support. Reg Birch was an initial asset to the formation of the CPB (ML) and not without confidence, he announced: “Small and new as it is on the British political scene the Communist Party of Britain (Marxist Leninist) is the only party which is genuinely a workers' party. It was founded by workers, serves only the working class and is unswervingly committed to the revolutionary task of smashing capitalism and all its institutions so that exploitation can be ended and workers can establish their own socialist state."1 He had the initial support of, not only his own engineering base, but also of probably the largest single organised Marxist‐Leninist group in the country, the Association of Indian Communist, those Maoists of Indian origin resident in Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • The Banshee's Kiss: Conciliation, Class and Conflict in Cork and The
    The Banshee’s Kiss: Conciliation, Class and Conflict in Cork and the All for Ireland League. Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Liverpool for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Patrick Joseph Murphy. August 2019 1 The Banshee’s Kiss: Conciliation, Class and Conflict in Cork and the All for Ireland League. ABSTRACT Historians have frequently portrayed constitutional nationalism as being homogeneous - ‘the Home Rule movement’- after the reunification of the Irish parliamentary party in 1900. Yet there were elements of nationalist heterodoxy all over the country, but it was only in Cork where dissent took an organised form in the only formal breakaway from the Irish party when the All for Ireland League (A.F.I.L.) was launched in 1910. The AFIL took eight of the nine parliamentary seats in Cork and gained control of local government in the city and county the following year. Existing historical accounts do not adequately explain why support for the Home Rule movement collapsed in Cork, but also why the AFIL flourished there but failed, despite the aspiration of its name, to expand beyond its regional base. The AFIL is chiefly remembered for its visionary policy of conciliation with unionists following the Damascene conversion of its leader William O’Brien, transformed from the enemy of the landed classes to an apostle of a new kind of bi- confessional politics. This would, he claimed, end the ‘Banshee’s Kiss’, a cycle of conflict in which each new generation attempts to achieve Irish freedom. However, conciliation was a policy which was unpopular with both nationalists and unionists and O’Brien therefore needed to develop an electoral base by other means with more popular policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Evolution of the B&ICO
    Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line Sam Richards Notes on the evolution of the B&ICO [Written 2011: Posted 2014 Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line] As the Russian-Chinese ideological dispute moved towards an open breach, anti-revisionist sympathisers emerged in other Communist parties. In Britain, the first public anti-revisionist group came out of the Communist Party of Great Britain in September 1963 — the Committee to Defeat Revisionism for Communist Unity (CDRCU) — and started to publish a well produced typeset monthly paper, Vanguard. A number of Irish emigrant radicals became involved in radical left politics in London in the early Sixties. Some were former republican prisoners such as Gerry Lawless, others young northern students like Eamonn McCann and Mike Farrell. Another young emigrant who entered the milieu was from the County Cork/County Kerry borderland, Brendan Clifford. Like other Irish émigré politics in London in the early anti-revisionist struggle, Brendan Clifford was once part of the Communist Party of Great Britain. He left them in October 1963 and joined Michael McCreey’s Committee to Defeat Revisionism for Communist Unity. Elements of the London Irish left rallied to the anti-revisionist politics of the CDRCU (including Noel Jenkinson, who, as a member of the Official IRA, would be convicted for bombing the officers’ mess of the 16th Parachute Brigade at Aldershot army barracks on February 22, 1972.1) Liam Daltun2 had initiated a series of on-going discussions involving a wide spread of Irish leftists
    [Show full text]
  • The Character of Unionism
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232861941 The Character of Unionism Article in Irish Political Studies · January 1994 DOI: 10.1080/07907189408406521 CITATIONS READS provided by MURAL - Maynooth University Research Archive Library View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk CORE 20 brought to you by 65 1 author: Colin Coulter National University of Ireland, Maynooth 38 PUBLICATIONS 182 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: stigmatic shaming View project Austerity View project All content following this page was uploaded by Colin Coulter on 28 November 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. This article was downloaded by: [Maynooth University Library] On: 28 November 2014, At: 03:43 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Irish Political Studies Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fips20 The character of unionism Colin Coulter a a Department of Sociology , The Queen's University of Belfast , Published online: 19 Oct 2007. To cite this article: Colin Coulter (1994) The character of unionism, Irish Political Studies, 9:1, 1-24, DOI: 10.1080/07907189408406521 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07907189408406521 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the People's Democracy
    1 The History of the People’s Democracy: civil rights, socialism, and the struggle against the Northern state, 1968-1983 Matthew Collins, BA, MA Thesis submitted for the examination of a Doctorate of Philosophy in history Faculty of Arts, Department of History, March 2018 Supervisor: Dr Emmet O’Connor I confirm that the word count of this thesis is less than 100,000 words. 2 Table of contents Acknowledgements p. 5 Abstract p. 6 Abbreviations p. 7 Chapter 1: Introduction and literature review 1.1. Introduction: the changing question p. 10 1.2. Structure and methodology p. 22 1.3. Literature review: interpreting the civil rights movement p. 35 1.4. The pursuit of socialism after 1968 p. 48 1.5. A short historical introduction p. 61 Chapter 2: Global revolt and the birth of the People’s Democracy 2.1. Introduction p. 80 2.2. The roots of the student revolt p. 83 2.3. Early student activism p. 95 2.4. October 1968 p. 104 2.5. Street politics and civil disobedience p. 117 2.6. Conclusion: a real change p. 126 Chapter 3: Civil rights at the crossroads 3.1. Introduction p. 128 3.2. After October p. 130 3.3. The November reforms p. 137 3.4. The Long March: four days that shook Northern Ireland p. 150 3.5. The ambush at Burntollet Bridge p. 162 3.6. Civil rights reignited p. 167 3.7. Conclusion p. 177 3 Chapter 4: From civil rights to civil strife 4.1. Introduction: 1969 the fateful year p.
    [Show full text]
  • 'A Long March: Paul Bew and Ireland's Nations'
    A Long March Brendan O’Leary: Paul Bew and Ireland’s Nations Ireland: The Politics of Enmity 1789-2006, by Paul Bew, Oxford University Press, 652 pp, £35, ISBN: 978- 0198205555 Paul Bew is an extremely intelligent, widely read, urbane, productive, original and extensively published historian with a sustained record of public engagement in politics. As an historian he professionally reads his way through multiple, and not just official, archives. He critically considers primary source materials and engages in sensible evaluation and criticism, for example in interpreting the by-elections in Ireland that preceded the Easter 1916 Rising. He corrects himself when he has been wrong. He treats history as a problem- solving discipline. He asks open questions of past events, explores primary and secondary literatures in the light of these questions and returns with a relevant explanation that enables the reader to see what drove his conclusions and to evaluate whether they are robust. On occasions he is not so open-minded, notably in his appraisals of Éamon de Valera and of the Anglo-Irish Agreement of 1985. Bew cares deeply about factual accuracy, though in his preface to Ireland: The Politics of Enmity 1789- 2006 (hereafterThe Politics of Enmity) he carefully does not claim impartiality, partly because he assumes such a claim would be treated as suspect in an historian of Ireland. There are some very minor mistakes in his book, but to err is human.(1) He is not impartial, but he is no blatant partisan. Partiality shows in methodological selection biases rather than in any deliberate distortions, in certain forms of empathy and estrangement, and in accepting some authors’ agendas rather than others’.
    [Show full text]
  • Tradition and Ideology in the IRA 1948 – 1962 by David Seán Browne
    Joining the Movement: Tradition and Ideology in the IRA 1948 – 1962 By David Seán Browne Thesis submitted for the degree of Ph.D The National University of Ireland, Maynooth The Department of History November 2013 Head of The Department of History: Professor Marian Lyons Supervisors: Dr Martin Maguire, Dr Ian Speller Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... ii List of Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... iv Introduction ........................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1 ..........................................................................................................................23 The anti-partition debate and the revival of republican separatism 1948-1956. Chapter 2 ..........................................................................................................................83 „From the soldiers of yesterday to the soldiers of today‟: The inheritors of the Fenian Tradition. Chapter 3 ........................................................................................................................137 „The story without an End‟. Representations of the Irish historical narrative 1932-1959. Chapter 4 ........................................................................................................................188 „Cyprus now, Ireland when ?‟.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Re-Approaching the Social Dimensions of the Irish Civil War
    Notes 1 Re-approaching the Social Dimensions of the Irish Civil War 1. Brendan Clifford (1993) The Irish Civil War: the Conflict that Formed the State: a Speech given to the Duhallow Heritage Centre on the 22nd April, 1992 (Cork). 2. Patrick Lynch (1966) ‘The Social Revolution That Never Was’ in Desmond Williams (ed.) The Irish Struggle 1916–1926 (London), pp. 41–54. Francis Costello (2003) The Irish Revolution and its Aftermath, 1916–1923: Years of Revolt (Dublin), p. 285 and passim. R. F. Foster (1988) Modern Ireland, 1600–1972 (London), p. 515. 3. Seán Cronin (1980) Irish Nationalism: a History of its Roots and Ideology (Dublin), p. 219. 4. Richard English (1994) Radicals and the Republic: Socialist Republicanism in the Irish Free State, 1925–1937 (Oxford), pp. 59, 38, 45, and 272. 5. However, the notion of an ‘Irish Revolution’ is not entirely anachronistic. See William O’Brien (1923) The Irish Revolution and How it Came About (Dublin). On the terminological and conceptual issues surrounding the notion of an ‘Irish Revolution’ see the contributions of Charles Townshend, Peter Hart, and Tom Garvin in Joost Augusteijn (ed.) (2002) The Irish Revolution 1913–1923 (Basingstoke). 6. Frank Gallagher (2005 edn) The Four Glorious Years, 1918–1921 (Dublin). 7. On the early ‘conventional’ phase of the fighting see Paul V. Walsh (1998) ‘The Irish Civil War, 1922–1923: a Military Study of the Conventional Phase, 28 June–11 August, 1922’, paper delivered to NYMAS at the CUNY Graduate Center, New York (available online as a NYMAS Fulltext Resource). 8. From de Valera’s famous end-of-war message to the IRA in Maurice Moynihan (ed.) (1980) Speeches and Statements by Éamon de Valera 1917–73 (Dublin), p.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Foreign Affairs
    Irish Foreign Affairs Volume Six, Number 2 June 2013 “Every nation, if it is to survive as a nation, must study its own history and have a foreign policy” —C.J. O’Donnell, The Lordship of the World, 1924, p.145 Contents Editorial - Greece p. 2 JFK Conspiracy Theories Part 4 John Martin p. 8 Conor Cruise O’Brien: Diplomat or Dictator? - A Preview Pat Muldowney p. 14 Starving the Germans: the Evolution of Britain’s Strategy of Economic Warfare During the First World War—The French Connection Part 3 Eamon Dyas p. 15 ‘Emergency Czechmate’ or Wartime Dialogue? Dev, the ‘Irish Institute’ and the Masaryk Affair Manus O’Riordan p. 20 A Dangerous Delusion: Why The West Got It Wrong about Nuclear Iran Interviews with David Morrison p. 27 Documents A Pardon for Deserters - Letters p. 30 De Valera’s Reply to Churchill 16 May 1945 p. 31 Speech by Brendan Halligan on Europe p. 33 What If? —The start of WWII — 9/11 p. 34 Irish Soldiers Deployed Abroad Today p. 35 Mali’s Natural Resources p. 36 A Quarterly Review published by the Irish Political Review Group, Dublin Greece Editorial When the attempted coup against the Gorbachev regime USA spread westwards, clearing the ground of all obstacles as in the Soviet Union failed in August 1991, Problems Of it went, and treating the humans who were in the way as wild Communism (a forerunner of this journal) said that an era of beasts. intense nationalism around the world had begun. David Bailie Warden, a young, idealistic, Presbyterian Until that moment the world had been an arena of contention clergyman, escaped persecution as a United Irishman by fleeing between two incompatible socio-economic systems: Capitalism to America.
    [Show full text]
  • Tactics, Politics, and Propaganda in the Irish War of Independence, 1917-1921
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Theses Department of History Spring 5-8-2011 Tactics, Politics, and Propaganda in the Irish War of Independence, 1917-1921 Mike Rast Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Rast, Mike, "Tactics, Politics, and Propaganda in the Irish War of Independence, 1917-1921." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2011. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses/46 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TACTICS, POLITICS, AND PROPAGANDA IN THE IRISH WAR OF INDEPENDENCE, 1917-1921 by MIKE RAST Under the Direction of Dr. Ian C. Fletcher ABSTRACT This thesis examines the influences on and evolution of the Irish Republican Army‗s guerrilla war strategy between 1917 and 1921. Utilizing newspapers, government documents, and memoirs of participants, this study highlights the role of propaganda and political concerns in waging an insurgency. It argues that while tactical innovation took place in the field, IRA General Headquarters imposed policy and directed the conflict with a concern for the political results of military action. While implementing strategies necessary to effective conflict of the war, this Headquarters staff
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of the Northern Ireland Conservatives
    Irish Political Studies ISSN: 0790-7184 (Print) 1743-9078 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fips20 The origins of the Northern Ireland conservatives Colin Coulter To cite this article: Colin Coulter (2001) The origins of the Northern Ireland conservatives, Irish Political Studies, 16:1, 29-48, DOI: 10.1080/07907180108406631 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07907180108406631 Published online: 19 Oct 2007. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 62 View related articles Citing articles: 4 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=fips20 Download by: [Maynooth University Library] Date: 14 November 2017, At: 06:51 THE ORIGINS OF THE NORTHERN IRELAND CONSERVATIVES Colin Coulter National University of Ireland, Maynooth Abstract: This article sets out to tell the story of the Conservative associations that appeared in parts of Northern Ireland in the late nineteen eighties. Ironically, the emergence of the Ulster Tories may be attributed largely to the activities of a small leftist sect. Throughout the seventies and eighties the British & Irish Communist Organisation (B&ICO) developed and advanced an ideological programme of 'electoral integrationism'. While the case for electoral integration attracted little attention initially, the advent of the Anglo-Irish Agreement enabled it to reach a wider and more receptive audience. The principal achievement of the electoral integrationist movement was perhaps to persuade the British Conservative Party to establish constituency organisations in Northern Ireland. Although opinion polls often suggested a bright future for Conservative politics in the region, the early nineties saw the Ulster Tories suffer humiliation in a sequence of elections.
    [Show full text]