Deglaciation of the Northwestern White Mountains, New Hampshire

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Deglaciation of the Northwestern White Mountains, New Hampshire Géographie physique et Quaternaire, 1999, vol. 53, n° 1, p. 59-77, 14 fig., 3 tabl. DEGLACIATION OF THE NORTHWESTERN WHITE MOUNTAINS, NEW HAMPSHIRE Woodrow B. THOMPSON*, Brian K. FOWLER** and Christopher C. DORION***, respectively Maine Geological Survey, 22 State House Station, Augusta, Maine 04333-0022 U.S.A.; Mount. Washington Observatory, P. O. Box 2310, North Conway, New Hampshire 03860 U.S.A. and Geological Services, 79 Bennoch Rd., Orono, Maine 04473 U.S.A. , 1999, vol. 53, n° 1, 14 fig., 3 tabl., 53(1), 1999W. B. THOMPSON, B. K. FOWLER and C. C. DORION ABSTRACT The mode of deglaciation in the RÉSUMÉ La déglaciation du nord-ouest des ZUSAMMENFASSUNG Enteisung der nord- northwestern White Mountains of New Hamp- White Mountains, au New Hampshire (E.- westlichen White Mountains, New Hampshire. shire has been controversial since the mid U.A.). Le mode de déglaciation du nord-ouest Die Art des Abschmelzens in den nordwestli- 1800’s. Early workers believed that active ice des White Mountains a fait l’objet de contro- chen White Mountains von New Hampshire ist deposited the Bethlehem Moraine complex in verses depuis le milieu du XIXe siècle. Les pre- seit Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts umstritten ge- the Ammonoosuc River basin during reces- miers chercheurs ont supposé que le wesen. Die ersten Forscher glaubten, dass ak- sion of the last ice sheet. In the 1930’s this de- complexe morainique de Bethlehem dans le tives Eis die Bethlehem-Moräne-Einheit glaciation model was replaced by the concept bassin de l’Ammonoosuc River avait été mis während des Rückzugs der letzten Eisdecke im of widespread simultaneous stagnation and en place par la glace active au cours du recul Becken des Ammonoosuc-Flusses ablagerte. downwastage of Late Wisconsinan ice. The du dernier Inlandsis. Au cours des années In den 30er Jahren des 20. Jahrhunderts wurde present authors reexamined the Bethlehem 1930, ce modèle de déglaciation a été rempla- dieses Enteisungsmodell durch das Konzept Moraine complex and support the original in- cé par le concept selon lequel il y aurait eu sta- einer gleichzeitigen weitflächigen Stagnation terpretation of a series of moraines deposited gnation simultanée sur une grande étendue et und Abwärtszehrung des Spät-Wisconsin-Ei- by active ice. We found other moraine clusters fonte de l’inlandsis du Wisconsinien supérieur. ses ersetzt. Die gegenwärtigen Autoren haben of similar age to the northeast in the Johns Riv- Les présents auteurs ont réétudié la Moraine die Bethlehem-Moräne-Einheit neu untersucht er and Israel River basins. Ice-marginal depos- de Bethlehem et appuient l’interprétation ori- und stützen die ursprüngliche Interpretation ei- its that probably correlate with the Bethlehem ginelle selon laquelle il s’agit d’un ensemble de ner Serie von Moränen, welche durch das akti- Moraine also occur west of Littleton. The Be- moraines terminales mises en place par une ve Eis abgelagert wurden. Sie fanden weitere thlehem Moraine complex and equivalent de- Moränen-Einheiten ähnlichen Alters nordost- glace active. Ils ont aussi découvert d’autres posits in adjacent areas were formed by wärts in den Becken von Johns River und Israel ensembles morainiques d’âge similaire au readvance and oscillatory retreat of the Con- River. Eisrand-Ablagerungen, die wahrschein- nord-est, dans les bassins de Johns River et necticut Valley lobe of the Laurentide Ice lich mit der Bethlehem-Moräne korrelieren, tre- Israel River. Quelques dépôts de marge gla- Sheet. This event is called the Littleton-Beth- ten auch westlich von Littleton auf. Die ciaire, probablement de la même époque que lehem Readvance. Throughout the study ar- Bethlehem-Moräne-Einheit und entsprechen- celle du complexe morainique de Bethlehem, ea, sequences of glaciolacustrine deposits de Ablagerungen in angrenzenden Gebieten ont aussi été identifiés à l’ouest de Littleton. Le and meltwater drainage channels indicate pro- wurden durch Rückvorstoβ und oszillatori- complexe morainique de Bethlehem et les dé- gressive northward recession of the glacier schen Rückzug der Connecticut Tal-Lobe der pôts équivalents dans les zones adjacentes margin. Radiocarbon dates from nearby New laurentischen Eisdecke gebildet. Dies Ereignis ont été mis en place par récurrence et retrait England and Québec suggest that the ice nennt man den Littleton-Bethlehem-Rückvor- sheet withdrew from this part of the White oscillatoire du lobe de la vallée du Connecticut stoβ. Durch das ganze erforschte Gebiet hin- Mountains between about 12,500 and appartenant à l’Inlandsis laurentidien. Il s’agit durch weisen Folgen glaziallimnischer 12,000 14C yr BP. We attribute the Littleton- de la récurrence de Littleton-Bethlehem. Les Ablagerungen und Schmelzwasser-Drainage- Bethlehem Readvance to a brief climatic cool- dates obtenues en Nouvelle-Angletterre et Rinnen auf einen Rückzug des Gletscherrands ing during Older Dyas time, close to dans le Québec limitrophe laissent supposer in Richtung Nordwest. Radiokarbondaten vom 12,000 BP. que l’Inlandsis laurentidien s’est retiré de cette nahen Neu-England und Québec legen nahe, partie des White Mountains vers dass die Eisdecke sich von diesem Teil der 14 12 500-12 000 C BP. Les auteurs attri- White Mountains zwischen etwa buent la récurrence à une refroidissement cli- 12 500-12 000 14C Jahren v.u.Z. zurückzog. matique de courte durée vers 12 000 BP, Wir schreiben den Littleton-Bethlehem Rück- pendant le Dryas ancien. vorstoβ einer kurzen Klima-Abkühlung wäh- rend des älteren Dryas zu, um 12 000 v.u.Z. Manuscrit reçu le 22 mai 1998 ; manuscrit révisé accepté le 14 décembre 1999 * E-mail address: [email protected] ** E-mail address: [email protected] *** E-mail address: [email protected] 60 W. B. THOMPSON, B. K. FOWLER and C. C. DORION INTRODUCTION sustained glacial flow (e.g. Gerath, 1978; Gerath et al., 1985; and Thompson and Fowler, 1989). Many geologists have investigated the glacial history of the White Mountains (see historical review by W. B. Thomp- The present study reexamines the Bethlehem Moraine complex, which is a belt of linear and hummocky glacial son, this volume). The early visits of Louis Agassiz, Edward deposits in the towns of Bethlehem and Littleton. This com- Hitchcock, and Charles Lyell stimulated interest in the plex was at the center of debate over the mode of deglacia- region. Studies in the northwestern White Mountains, tion in the White Mountains, having been used by between the Presidential Range and the Connecticut River, proponents of both active-ice and stagnation retreat to sup- led to controversy over the relative importance of local port their views. We also investigated other deposits to the (alpine) versus continental glaciation in this part of New east and west that may have formed at the same time as the Hampshire (Goldthwait, 1916). Later debate concerned the moraines in Bethlehem and Littleton. These include a thick style of deglaciation—whether there was active-ice retreat or section of glacial sediments next to Comerford Dam in the wholesale stagnation and accompanying downwastage of Connecticut River valley, which previous workers have the ice sheet (Goldthwait, 1938; Lougee, 1940). The concept attempted to correlate with the Bethlehem Moraine. of stagnation and downwastage in New England was domi- The Bethlehem Moraine complex is located in the central nant from the 1930’s until the late 1900’s. Ammonoosuc River basin. This river originates on the side of The application of the morphosequence concept in cen- Mount Washington in the Presidential Range and flows west to Littleton, whence it takes a southwesterly course to the tral to southern New England (Koteff and Pessl, 1981) Connecticut River (Fig. 1). The deglaciation history of the showed that systematic ice-margin retreat occurred in many Ammonoosuc basin is closely related to that of neighboring areas where end moraines are scarce or absent. This para- river basins to the north. The Israel River drains part of the digm shift forced a reevaluation of the stagnation theory northern Presidential Range and flows northwest to the Con- throughout the region. Recent descriptions of moraines and necticut River at Lancaster. Between the Ammonoosuc and glaciotectonic structures in the northeastern White Moun- Israel Rivers is the Johns River, a shorter stream that flows tains have shown that active ice persisted during deglacia- northwest through Whitefield and enters the Connecticut tion in areas that were topographically favorable for River in Dalton (Fig. 1). FIGURE 1. Map of northern White Mountain region, showing principal Région du nord des White Mountains, montrant les principales villes towns and rivers in New Hampshire and adjacent Vermont. Thick gray et rivières du New Hampshire et du Vermont attenant. Le trait gris large line is inferred southern limit of Littleton-Bethlehem Readvance. marque la limite méridionale de la récurrence de Lettleton-Bethlehem. Géographie physique et Quaternaire, 53(1), 1999 DEGLACIATION OF THE NORTHWESTERN WHITE MOUNTAINS 61 Damming of the west-draining Ammonoosuc, Israel, and mountains after recession of the continental ice sheet. Upham Johns River valleys by the receding Late Wisconsinan ice could not distinguish the sharp moraine ridges reported by sheet formed a series of ephemeral lakes (Lougee, n.d., Agassiz, and he characterized the Bethlehem Moraine as 1939). Northward recession of the ice sheet opened pro- being the “continental type”. Upham’s description is close to gressively lower outlets for these lakes. We used the posi- what the present authors have seen: “The material of this belt tions and elevations of the spillway channels, together with is chiefly till, with some modified drift, as kames, or knolls of moraines and ice-contact deltas, to help reconstruct the gravel and sand. The contour is very irregular, in multitudes of sequence of deglaciation. hillocks and little ridges, grouped without order or much paral- lelism of their trends. Everywhere in and upon these deposits PREVIOUS WORK boulders abound,..
Recommended publications
  • Summer Breeze
    View from the Chair by Anne Chace That Time of Year It may not have been a typical winter, but now it's time to dust off the hiking boots and get the dayhack packs ready to go. Check those bike tires and put the canoe/kayak rack on the car. And don't forget about all the trailwork that needs to be done ... it's that time of year. During this, our chapte/s Silver Jubilee year, make it a point to GET great paftici- OUTDOORSI Find an activity or two that interest you and call one of Our hosting of the AMC Spnng Gahering was a success . wheher pants wete nnping or iltnl<ed down in heabd cr,bins. Clubynile meetings were our leaders. Activity chairs and leaders have been busy during the hed, varbus chapter-bd aclivities run ..,, aN the rains held off untiltlrc very end. 'off season' preparing trips to meet varied interests. Supprt them by going on the tdps. Just pick up the phone and call or click on your s Our "Cape Cod Caper" is a big success mail. Answer the soeening questions and take the plunge. Even if Dexler Robinson, Spring Gathering Coordinator you've never participated in a chapter activi$, make a special efiort to get out on one this season, for the true spirit of the AMC is our chap On the weekend of April 26-28, our chapter hosted Spring Gathering ter activities, and SEM/AMC has some ol the best offerings. And 2002 for approximately 195 people at Camp Burgess in Sandwich.
    [Show full text]
  • NH Trout Stocking - April 2018
    NH Trout Stocking - April 2018 Town WaterBody 3/26‐3/30 4/02‐4/06 4/9‐4/13 4/16‐4/20 4/23‐4/27 4/30‐5/04 ACWORTH COLD RIVER 111 ALBANY IONA LAKE 1 ALLENSTOWN ARCHERY POND 1 ALLENSTOWN BEAR BROOK 1 ALLENSTOWN CATAMOUNT POND 1 ALSTEAD COLD RIVER 1 ALSTEAD NEWELL POND 1 ALSTEAD WARREN LAKE 1 ALTON BEAVER BROOK 1 ALTON COFFIN BROOK 1 ALTON HURD BROOK 1 ALTON WATSON BROOK 1 ALTON WEST ALTON BROOK 1 AMHERST SOUHEGAN RIVER 11 ANDOVER BLACKWATER RIVER 11 ANDOVER HIGHLAND LAKE 11 ANDOVER HOPKINS POND 11 ANTRIM WILLARD POND 1 AUBURN MASSABESIC LAKE 1 1 1 1 BARNSTEAD SUNCOOK LAKE 1 BARRINGTON ISINGLASS RIVER 1 BARRINGTON STONEHOUSE POND 1 BARTLETT THORNE POND 1 BELMONT POUT POND 1 BELMONT TIOGA RIVER 1 BELMONT WHITCHER BROOK 1 BENNINGTON WHITTEMORE LAKE 11 BENTON OLIVERIAN POND 1 BERLIN ANDROSCOGGIN RIVER 11 BRENTWOOD EXETER RIVER 1 1 BRISTOL DANFORTH BROOK 11 BRISTOL NEWFOUND LAKE 1 BRISTOL NEWFOUND RIVER 11 BRISTOL PEMIGEWASSET RIVER 11 BRISTOL SMITH RIVER 11 BROOKFIELD CHURCHILL BROOK 1 BROOKFIELD PIKE BROOK 1 BROOKLINE NISSITISSIT RIVER 11 CAMBRIDGE ANDROSCOGGIN RIVER 1 CAMPTON BOG POND 1 CAMPTON PERCH POND 11 CANAAN CANAAN STREET LAKE 11 CANAAN INDIAN RIVER 11 NH Trout Stocking - April 2018 Town WaterBody 3/26‐3/30 4/02‐4/06 4/9‐4/13 4/16‐4/20 4/23‐4/27 4/30‐5/04 CANAAN MASCOMA RIVER, UPPER 11 CANDIA TOWER HILL POND 1 CANTERBURY SPEEDWAY POND 1 CARROLL AMMONOOSUC RIVER 1 CARROLL SACO LAKE 1 CENTER HARBOR WINONA LAKE 1 CHATHAM BASIN POND 1 CHATHAM LOWER KIMBALL POND 1 CHESTER EXETER RIVER 1 CHESTERFIELD SPOFFORD LAKE 1 CHICHESTER SANBORN BROOK
    [Show full text]
  • The Nayigation of the Connecticut River
    1903.] The Navigation of the Connecticut River. 385 THE NAYIGATION OF THE CONNECTICUT RIVER. BY W. DELOSS LOVE. THE discovery of the Connecticut river has been generally attributed hy histoi'ians to Adriaen Block. If Giovanni da Verrazano in 1524 or Estovan Gomez in 1525 sailed by its mouth, we have no record of the fact ; and it is very doubtful whether a river, whose semicircle of sand bars must have proclaimed it such, would have attracted much attention from any navigator seeking a northwest passage. In 1614, Block, having completed his yacht the Onrust [Restless], set sail from Manhattan to explore the bays and rivers to the. eastward. His vessel was well adapted to his purpose, being of sixteen tons burden, forty-four and a half feet long and eleven and a half feefc wide. He was able thus to obtain a more exact knowledge of the coast, as may be seen by the "Figurative Map," which is sup- posed to exhibit the results of his explorations.^ At the mouth of the Connecticut river he found the water quite shallow, but the draught of his yacht enabled him to cross the bar Avithout danger and the white man was soon for the first time folloAving northward the course of New Eng- land's longest river. There were few inhabitants to be seen near the mouth, but at a point which is thought to have been just above the bend near Middletown, he came upon the lodges of. the Sequins, located on both banks of thé river. Still farther up he saw an Indian village "resembling a fort for protection against the attacks of their enemies." This was in latitude 41° 48', and was, > De Laet's " Description of the New Netherlands," x: Y:,met.
    [Show full text]
  • Official List of Public Waters
    Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area).
    [Show full text]
  • New Hampshire River Protection and Energy Development Project Final
    ..... ~ • ••. "'-" .... - , ... =-· : ·: .• .,,./.. ,.• •.... · .. ~=·: ·~ ·:·r:. · · :_ J · :- .. · .... - • N:·E·. ·w··. .· H: ·AM·.-·. "p• . ·s;. ~:H·1· ··RE.;·.· . ·,;<::)::_) •, ·~•.'.'."'~._;...... · ..., ' ...· . , ·....... ' · .. , -. ' .., .- .. ·.~ ···•: ':.,.." ·~,.· 1:·:,//:,:: ,::, ·: :;,:. .:. /~-':. ·,_. •-': }·; >: .. :. ' ::,· ;(:·:· '5: ,:: ·>"·.:'. :- .·.. :.. ·.·.···.•. '.1.. ·.•·.·. ·.··.:.:._.._ ·..:· _, .... · -RIVER~-PR.OT-E,CT.10-N--AND . ·,,:·_.. ·•.,·• -~-.-.. :. ·. .. :: :·: .. _.. .· ·<··~-,: :-:··•:;·: ::··· ._ _;· , . ·ENER(3Y~EVELOP~.ENT.PROJ~~T. 1 .. .. .. .. i 1·· . ·. _:_. ~- FINAL REPORT··. .. : .. \j . :.> ·;' .'·' ··.·.· ·/··,. /-. '.'_\:: ..:· ..:"i•;. ·.. :-·: :···0:. ·;, - ·:··•,. ·/\·· :" ::;:·.-:'. J .. ;, . · · .. · · . ·: . Prepared by ~ . · . .-~- '·· )/i<·.(:'. '.·}, •.. --··.<. :{ .--. :o_:··.:"' .\.• .-:;: ,· :;:· ·_.:; ·< ·.<. (i'·. ;.: \ i:) ·::' .::··::i.:•.>\ I ··· ·. ··: · ..:_ · · New England ·Rtvers Center · ·. ··· r "., .f.·. ~ ..... .. ' . ~ "' .. ,:·1· ,; : ._.i ..... ... ; . .. ~- .. ·· .. -,• ~- • . .. r·· . , . : . L L 'I L t. ': ... r ........ ·.· . ---- - ,, ·· ·.·NE New England Rivers Center · !RC 3Jo,Shet ·Boston.Massachusetts 02108 - 117. 742-4134 NEW HAMPSHIRE RIVER PRO'l'ECTION J\ND ENERGY !)EVELOPMENT PBOJECT . -· . .. .. .. .. ., ,· . ' ··- .. ... : . •• ••• \ ·* ... ' ,· FINAL. REPORT February 22, 1983 New·England.Rivers Center Staff: 'l'bomas B. Arnold Drew o·. Parkin f . ..... - - . • I -1- . TABLE OF CONTENTS. ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS . ~ . • • . .. • .ii EXECUTIVE
    [Show full text]
  • PROVENANCE and TECTONIC HISTORY of METAMORPHIC ROCKS of CENTRAL PARK and NEW YORK CITY Steven J
    PROVENANCE AND TECTONIC HISTORY OF METAMORPHIC ROCKS OF CENTRAL PARK AND NEW YORK CITY Steven J. Jaret1,2, Nicholas D. Tailby1, Keiji Hammond1, E. Troy Rasbury2, Kathleen Wooton2, E. DiPadova1,3, Lisa Smith1,3, Riley Smith1,3, Victoria Yuan1,3, and Noa Jaffe1,3 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY. 2Department of Geosciences, Stony Brook University. 3Department of Education, New York City. The rocks underlying much of New York City, frequently referred to as the “Manhattan Prong”, predominately consist of a series of metasedimentary units, which were originally deposited into the Iapetus Ocean and subsequently deformed and metamorphosed during the Taconic, Acadian, and Alleghenian Orogenies (Merguerian and Merguerian , 2014, 2016; van Staal and Barr, 2012). Despite extensive field mapping in parks around Manhattan and subsurface mapping in major infrastructure sites (i.e., building foundations and tunnels), these rocks have not been studied geochemically and isotopically and interpretation within the larger tectonic framework has largely been based on correlation with presumed equivalent units in Connecticut and New England. Here we present new detrital zircon and Nd isotope provenance analyses in the broader geologic context of Northern Appalachia. General Background The Manhattan Schist was originally defined by Hall, 1976 and has been the subject of great debate for nearly 50 years. Merguerian 2004; 2016 has subdivided the original “Manhattan Schist” of Hall into 3 subunits of schistose rocks. He correlated the third unit with the Hartland Schist in Connecticut and thus interpreted these to be fault-bounded schists which were juxtaposed during a middle Ordovician collision between the eastern margin of Laurentia and volcanic arcs (the so-called “Taconic Arc”).
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of the Saddleback Mountain Area, Northwood Quadrangle, Southeastern New Hampshire
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository New England Intercollegiate Geological NEIGC Trips Excursion Collection 1-1-1984 The geology of the Saddleback Mountain Area, Northwood quadrangle, southeastern New Hampshire Whitaker, Laura R. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/neigc_trips Recommended Citation Whitaker, Laura R., "The geology of the Saddleback Mountain Area, Northwood quadrangle, southeastern New Hampshire" (1984). NEIGC Trips. 352. https://scholars.unh.edu/neigc_trips/352 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the New England Intercollegiate Geological Excursion Collection at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in NEIGC Trips by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. B6-1 207 THE GEOLOGY OF THE SADDLEBACK MOUNTAIN AREA, NORTHWOOD QUADRANGLE, SOUTHEASTERN NEW HAMPSHIRE Laura R. Whitaker Department of Geology The College of Charleston Charleston. SC 2942^ Introduction Saddleback Mountain is a four-peaked saddle-shapped mountain located 39 km west of Portsmouth, NH (Figure 1). The mountain lies along the boundary between the New England Uplands and the Seaboard Lowlands Sections of the New England Physiographic Province of Fenneman (1938). It also lies adjacent to the western boundary of the Massabesic Gneiss Complex as designated by Anderson (1978). Figure 2 of this text is a generalized Geologic Map of Southeastern New Hampshire compiled from Billings (1956) and later workers cited in the references from Figure 1. Portions of Figure 2 show that the Saddleback Mountain area is on strike with two convergent fault zones which are postulated to be of regional tectonic significance: the Nurambego of southern Maine (Hussey and Pankiwskyj, 1976; Hussey and Newberg, 1978), and the Pinnacle-Campbell-Hill-Hall Mountain Faults mapped by Camein (1976).
    [Show full text]
  • Quarrernary GEOLOGY of MINNESOTA and PARTS of ADJACENT STATES
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Ray Lyman ,Wilbur, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director P~ofessional Paper 161 . QUArrERNARY GEOLOGY OF MINNESOTA AND PARTS OF ADJACENT STATES BY FRANK LEVERETT WITH CONTRIBUTIONS BY FREDERICK w. SARDE;30N Investigations made in cooperation with the MINNESOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1932 ·For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract ________________________________________ _ 1 Wisconsin red drift-Continued. Introduction _____________________________________ _ 1 Weak moraines, etc.-Continued. Scope of field work ____________________________ _ 1 Beroun moraine _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 47 Earlier reports ________________________________ _ .2 Location__________ _ __ ____ _ _ __ ___ ______ 47 Glacial gathering grounds and ice lobes _________ _ 3 Topography___________________________ 47 Outline of the Pleistocene series of glacial deposits_ 3 Constitution of the drift in relation to rock The oldest or Nebraskan drift ______________ _ 5 outcrops____________________________ 48 Aftonian soil and Nebraskan gumbotiL ______ _ 5 Striae _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 48 Kansan drift _____________________________ _ 5 Ground moraine inside of Beroun moraine_ 48 Yarmouth beds and Kansan gumbotiL ______ _ 5 Mille Lacs morainic system_____________________ 48 Pre-Illinoian loess (Loveland loess) __________ _ 6 Location__________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • See the Wildlife Action Plan Habitat Profile
    Appendix B: Habitats Floodplain Habitats Photo by Ben Kimball Acres in NH: 23,201 Percent of NH Area: >1 Acres Protected: 7656 Percent Protected: 33 Habitat Distribution Map Habitat Description Floodplains occur in river valleys adjacent to river channels and are prone to periodic flooding. Floodplains are often comprised of forests, oxbows, meadows, and thickets. The habitats, vegetation, and hydrologic regime of floodplains are strongly influenced by watershed size, gradient, and channel morphometry. Most open or partially wooded floodplain communities occur on low floodplains. Sloughs, oxbows, vernal pools, and other depressions in the floodplain tend to be inundated for longer periods than low floodplains (Sperduto 2011). Floodplain soils range from well‐drained coarse sand on levees to poorly drained silts and mucks in depressions, and tend to be moderately to strongly minerotrophic (Sperduto 2011). Montane/near‐boreal floodplains are found primarily along rivers in the White Mountains or northern New Hampshire, and have relatively high gradients and flashy flood regimes compared to other floodplain systems. Sugar maple (Acer saccharum) and balsam fir (Abies balsamea) are dominant trees, and riparian wetlands such as oxbows and sloughs are uncommon in these high‐ gradient floodplains. Major river silver maple floodplains occur primarily along the Connecticut and Merrimack Rivers, and occasionally on lower reaches of major tributaries. These floodplains are often interspersed with oxbow marshes and shrub communities. The forested areas are characterized by a canopy of silver maple (Acer saccharinum) over a lush herbaceous layer, with a sparse shrub layer. Temperate minor river floodplains are found along large streams and small rivers in central and New Hampshire Wildlife Action Plan Appendix B-101 Appendix B: Habitats southern New Hampshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Protection Plan
    Appendix A Ian Drew/USFWS View of upland forest on the refuge Land Protection Plan Land Protection Plan Land Protection Plan I. Introduction We propose to expand the land acquisition boundary of the Lake Umbagog National Wildlife Refuge by 49,718 acres. We also recognize the importance of communicating our interest in acquiring and conserving that land to our partners in conservation, the local community, and the public. This land protection plan (LPP) explains our interests and intentions to owners of land near the refuge, to state agencies in New Hampshire and Maine, our conservation partners, local communities and the public. It also presents methods the Service and landowners interested in selling their land can use in accomplishing the wildlife habitat objectives of alternative B, our preferred alternative in the draft comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) and environmental impact statement (EIS) for the refuge. We developed this LPP at the same time and in conformance with that draft CCP and EIS. We believe our acquisition of additional land in fee title and conservation easements will contribute significantly to the conservation of federal trust resources in the Upper Androscoggin River watershed. The purposes of this LPP are � to inform landowners of our long-standing policy of acquiring land only from willing sellers. If an owner is not interested in selling, we will not purchase that land or an easement on it. � to inform the public clearly and concisely about resource protection needs, our priorities and policies for protecting land, the extent of our proposal, and potential conservation methods; � to describe the impacts of our proposal; and � to describe our intentions for managing the land we acquire.
    [Show full text]
  • 7.0 Wildlife and Fisheries Overview
    Redington Wind Farm Redington Pond Range, Maine Section 7: Wildlife and Fisheries Prepared by Woodlot Alternatives, Inc. Topsham, Maine Redington Wind Farm Page i Section 7 – Wildlife and Fisheries Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Ecological Setting of Project area........................................................................... 3 3.0 Natural Communities and Wetlands ....................................................................... 5 3.1 Methods................................................................................................................ 5 3.2 Natural Community Descriptions ........................................................................ 7 3.2.1 Terrestrial Communities ................................................................................ 8 3.2.2 Beech-Birch-Maple Forest............................................................................. 9 3.2.3 Spruce-Northern Hardwood Forest.............................................................. 10 3.2.4 Spruce-Fir-Mountain Sorrel-Feathermoss Forest ........................................ 11 3.2.5 Fir-Heartleaved Birch Subalpine Forest ...................................................... 11 3.2.6 Regenerating Forest Stands.......................................................................... 14 3.2.7 Wetlands and Streams.................................................................................. 16 4.0 Fish
    [Show full text]
  • Lonesome Lake Distance (Round Trip): 3 1/4 Miles Walking Time: 2 3/4 Hours Vertical Rise: 1,000 Feet Difficulty : Moderate
    Lonesome Lake Distance (round trip): 3 1/4 miles Walking time: 2 3/4 hours Vertical rise: 1,000 feet Difficulty : Moderate One thousand feet above Franconia Notch is Lonesome Lake, one of the finest family hikes in the White Mountains, and a goal for climbers and visitors who take advantage of the graded trail to walk in and see a true mountain lake in a spectacular setting. No longer "lonesome," quite the opposite, the much- used trails, along with the plywood hut of the AMC, and the voices of hikers with their colorful packs and clothes, give a modern touch to the ancient scenery. The lake has been popular since the days of mountain inns after the Civil War, but still today, you cannot drive there. The only way to reach the lake is by walking. You can’t see the lake from the road below. The trail still mostly follows the old bridle path, along which many vacationers from the now-vanished hotels rode to the lake for the magnificent views of the mountains on both sides of the Notch. Legend names President Ulysses. S. Grant as one of the notable visitors. According to the story, he came to the Notch and the Profile House in 1869. A yellow coach and six bay horses driven by Ed Cox, a famous "whip," brought him from Bethlehem in fifty-five minutes—a fantastic rate of more than thirteen miles an hour. In later years, a steam train arid rails brought guests to the Profile House, -which burned in August 1923.
    [Show full text]