A Journalist's Lifelong Search for Truth
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
“A Journalist’s Lifelong Search for Truth” By Julie Mack Thanks so much for having me today. What I want to talk about today what I’ve learned about truth over my 40-some-year career as a journalist. Truth is a very big deal for most journalists and that’s certainly true for me. That search for truth is what hooked me on journalism, and the specific event was the Watergate scandal. I was 13 when that scandal started and I read everything I could about it. Of course, I was especially fascinated me was the story of how these two young reporters – Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein – were able to help uncover the truth that Nixon and his minions were trying to cover up. So I started in journalist enthralled by these very idealist notions of searching for truth. And at that point, I saw truth in pretty simplistic terms – there was right vs. wrong, truth vs. lies. Over the years, I had to come to grips with some hard lessons about truth. That’s truth is often complicated. It can be a matter of perspective. It can be elusive. It can be painful. And truth doesn’t always win; sometimes, the facts just don’t carry the day. So here are the lessons I’ve learned about truth. Lesson No. 1: Sometimes we simply don’t know the truth and we never will. Truth is often murky As a reporter, you learn this quickly – so many stories are he said vs. she said; someone makes an accusation and the alleged perp denies it. Maybe it was a racist comment from a store clerk, an inappropriate remark by a teacher, an accusation of sexual harassment or assault. How could we confirm for sure what happened? It’s actually easier today, thanks to the ubiquitousness of emails and texts, video and audio recordings. Think of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor and all the other police-involved killings where the story initially offered by police fell apart when looking at the video evidence. But there are still many, many times that we don’t know the truth. A classic example are some of the accusation of sexual misconduct levied against well-known people -- Brett Kavanaugh, Woody Allen, the rape accusation against Joe Biden last year. The fact is that we don’t know what happened in those instances and so much time has passed, likely that remain mysteries forever. People may think they know. But it’s nothing more than an educated guess. Lesson No. 2: Truth changes with time. Here, I’m not talking about facts as much as accepted truths in terms of societal norms. I was born in 1959. That means I grew up in a world it was taken for granted by many that men were superior to women; homosexuality was deviant behavior; interracial marriage was a radical act; sex before marriage was immoral; if you were an atheist, you kept it to yourself. All those norms have been upended since I was child. As a journalist, I’ve learned its helpful to have that perspective – that the truths we embrace today may not be the truths endorse down the road; that what we see truth evolves over time. Lesson No. 3: Truth reflects an individual’s lived experience. Have any of you seen the movie Rashamon? It’s a 1950 Japanese movie in which various characters provide self-serving, and contradictory versions of the same incident. As a journalist, it’s something I’ve seen often – people can have wildly different perspectives involving the truth of the matter even when the facts are not in dispute. I’m thinking, for instance, of a story I reported several years ago in which a high school football coach routinely smacked his players in the locker room, like physically hit them enough to hurt. It was not in dispute. A parent heard about it and complained; an internal investigation was done; the coach admitted it, and there was a letter documenting the issue in the coach’s personnel file. But the interpretation of those facts divided the school community. On one side were the parents and players who saw this an abusive coach who should be fired. On the other side – and this was the majority view in that community, btw – were those who thought that the issue was blown out of proportion. That’s a pattern I’ve often encountered when reporting stories. The debate isn’t over the facts, but when what those facts mean, and people have very different reactions based on their own values and their own experiences. I thought about this a lot during the Black Lives Matter unrest last summer. My take on racial injustice is that of an older white woman who tries to do the right thing but has never had to deal with this issue personally. That’s going to be a much different perspective that someone who is Black. As a reporter, one of the most important aspects of my job is to try to gain insight into a range of perspectives, from Trump voters to people of color to people of a different generation or different parts of the state – really listen to what they have to say and think about their truths. Lesson no. 4: Some things are beyond truth. Yet another lesson I’ve had to learn over the years is that some things are simply beyond the question of true or false. The best example here is religion. I grew up Catholic. I have parents who are deeply faithful Catholics – the kind of Catholics who go to daily mass and say the rosary. They would tell you that one of the central truths they hold dear is that Catholicism really is the one true faith. I’m many devoutly religious people feel that way, and not just Catholics, but also evangelical Christians, Seventh-Day Adventists, Mormons. orthodox Jews. Muslims, There are many people who feel their religious path is the only path, but – obviously – they can’t all be right. On the other hand, I can’t say they’re wrong either. Rather, this is about individual truths, and sometimes those are the most important kind. Lesson No. 5: The search for truth requires an open mind. One of the most important skills that I’ve had to learn as a journalist is approaching things with an open mind and a healthy dose of skepticism. There’s an old saying among journalists: “If your mother says she loves you, check it out.” The goal, always, is to verify the facts and get at the truth as much as possible, and sometimes that truth is much more complicated or nuanced or different than I expected. But no question, keeping that open mind can be really, really hard. Confirmation bias is a huge issue for all of us, including journalists. A cautionary tale for all journalists – and all people, really – was the case of a now-infamous Rolling Stone story published in 2014 detailing the story of a University of Virginia student who said she was gang-raped at by seven people at fraternity party. The woman’s story was horrifying. She also totally made it up out of whole cloth, but somehow convinced an award-winning journalist and the editors at Rolling Stone that it was true. So campus rape is a real thing. But in trying to illustrate that point, the reporter, Sabrina Erdeley, had a huge blind spot – she bought too hard into the idea that all alleged victims should be believed, and she failed to do some basic fact-checking to verify the woman’s story. It cost Ederley her journalism career and results in millions of dollars of libel lawsuit judgements against Ederley and Rolling Stone. The takeaway from the Rolling Stone story controversy is the importance of being aware of your inner bias and not taking anything at face value. Lesson No. 6: Truth can hurt. And part of the risk of approaching things with an open mind is discovering unpleasant truths. A person you admire is accused of wrongdoing or is caught in a lie. A policy you thought was a good idea turns out to be a dismal failure. New information is made public that casts a controversy in a totally new light. One of the most difficult stories that I ever covered was the Larry Nassar sexual abuse scandal at Michigan State University. You may remember that Nassar was a sports-medicine doctor who sexually abused hundreds of young female patients over a 25-year period. He got away with it for that long because the abuse involved digital penetration that he told the women was a very specialized treatment for sports-related injuries. When it comes to truth there were two different groups of victims in that case. The first involved women who almost immediately recognized or suspected that this was abuse, although those who complained were ignored. Those women felt vindicated, even validated, by Nassar’s arrest. But there also were patients who totally bought into the idea that this was a legit medical procedure and spent years as a Nassar patient undergoing this “treatment.” They were emotionally crushed by this – somebody they liked and trusted and admired turned out to be their sexual abuser, and the women had allowed this to happen. As one woman said to me, it brought her whole sense of judgment into question. If this turned out to be so different than what she thought was happening all these years, what else was she wrong about? It really showed me how learning the truth isn’t always liberating.