FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY DI FORM 1926 (June 1988) Date Received:______OMB No. 1024-0037 Sent for Review:______Approved through 6/30/91 Control No.:______
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
APPLICATION for a FEDERAL PERMIT under THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES PROTECTION ACT approved October 31, 1979 (P.L. 96-95; 93 Stat 721; 16 U.S.C. 470aa-II; 43 CFR 7) or THE ANTIQUITIES ACT approved June 8, 1906 (P.L. 59-209; 34 Stat. 225; 16 U.S.C. 431-433; 43 CFR 3)
Instructions: Complete and return two copies of this application form and attachments to each state or regional office of the land managing agencies involved. All information requested must be completed before the application will be considered. Use separate sheets of paper if more space is needed to complete a section. 1. Name of Institution: 2. Address: (include zip code)
Gray & Pape, Inc. 1705 East Main Street Richmond, VA 23223 (804) 644-0656 [email protected]
3. Type of Permit requested: (check appropriate box)
a. Surveys and limited testing/limited collections of lands identified in No. 4.
b. Excavation, collection, and intensive study of specific site areas described below in No. 4. 4. Lands of the United States for which a permit is requested:
The survey to be conducted is on the Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge, Chincoteague, Virginia, more specifically delineated in exhibits B-1 and B-2.
On behalf of John Amrhein, Jr., Gray and Pape proposes to conduct limited underwater archaeological remote sensing investigations in support of Mr. Amrhein’s efforts to locate and document the location of the wreck of the Spanish warship, La Galga. It is believed that the remains of La Galga lie near in the remnants of a former inlet at Assateague Island south of the Virginia-Maryland border. See also Exhibit A.
b. Attach a copy of a map, sketch, or plan showing specific sites or areas for which permit is desired. See attached figures B-1 and B-2, and B-3.
5. Nature and extent of the work proposed, including how and why it is proposed to be conducted:
For this phase of the project, the proposed survey will be a non-invasive study using remote sensing technology. No subsurface excavation will take place as part of this phase of the project. The remote sensing equipment selected for this work is the Geometrics 858 cesium vapor magnetometer with a GPS interface. (See Exhibit C) The overall goal of the survey is to verify magnetic anomalies in an area believed to be the remains of the Spanish warship La Galga. These features are contained with the waterfowl impoundment known as Old Field’s Pond (see attached location map A-2). The survey will consist of covering the project area along spaced transects set at distances of no greater than 25 feet apart. The transects will correspond to a grid which will be established at the outset of fieldwork. Initial sweeps of the project area will be conducted along the transects forming the north-south axis of the grid. If anomalies are detected, they will be more closely examined with the sensor by closing the distance of the survey grid as well as utilizing the east-west running transects of the grid. If the concentrated anomalies are located, the survey will be extended outward to identify any debris field associated with the wreck. The GPS interface on the magnetometer unit will precisely record all readings with their location. The survey will be conducted in two areas. One is the area believed to contain the wreck, and if it is found to be in the proposed area, then the adjoining area to the west that most likely contains shipwreck artifacts and cultural material left from the 200 crew who camped here for three days following the wreck will be mapped. See Exhibit B-2.
After the raw data is recorded into the magnetometer console it will be downloaded into the computer of the consulting archaeologist and processed with Surfer for Windows which will prepare a map of the area showing the grid lines of the survey and the resultant magnetic field readings and anomalies. This data and resulting map will be evaluated by the Gray & Pape archaeologists and the results will be incorporated into a technical report detailing the project results as well as recommendations for future testing and research.
6. Name, address and institutional affiliation, if any, of persons in “a” and “b” below:
a. Individual(s) proposed to be responsible for conducting the work (i.e., in direct charge of field work): Include evidence of qualifications (vitae) in accordance with Section 7.8 of the Final Uniform Regulation (43 CFR 7).
Bradley McDonald See CV at Exhibit D and E
b. Individuals proposed to be responsible for carrying out the terms and conditions of the permit (i.e., in general charge):
Bradley McDonald See CV at Exhibit D and E
7. Proposed date field work will begin: 8. Proposed time of performance:
April 2008 No more than 2 days of fieldwork 9. University, museum or other scientific or educational institution in which the applicant proposes to store all collections and copies of records, data, photographs and other documents derived from the proposed work: (The application must include a written certification, signed by an authorized official of the institution., of willingness to assume curatorial responsibility, and to safeguard and preserve these materials as property of the United States or, in the case of an application on Indian lands, in the event the Indian owners do not wish to take custody.) See Exhibit F.
Because no subsurface excavation will occur as a result of this phase of the project, it is anticipated that no artifacts will be recovered. Curation of field notes, photographs, and other materials generated during the course of the project will be coordinated with the Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge
10. Proposed outlet for public written dissemination of the results:
The results of the remote sensing survey will be presented in a technical report that will be made available to the management staff of the Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge and Region 5 of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. No other’s except for those described in Item 9 above will receive the report with permission of the Fish and Wildlife Service.
Evidence of the applicant’s ability to initiate, conduct and complete the proposed work, including evidence of logistical support and laboratory facilities: see attachment
12. Signature of individual in general charge: 13. Date of application:
February19, 2008 Bradley McDonald, Senior Manager Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
This information is being collected to conduct archeological studies on lands under the jurisdiction of the Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge. This information will be used to ensure that the proposed studies meet statutory and regulatory requirements. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit. The public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average one hour per response. including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, National Park Service, Washington. D.C. 20013 and the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. Office of Management and Budget. Washington, D.C. 20503. Table of Exhibits
Exhibit A …………Description of Proposal 3 pages
Exhibit B………….Proposed Survey Area 1 page
Exhibit B-2………..Enlarged Survey Area 1 page
Exhibit B-3……….. Aerial Photo of survey area 1 page
Exhibit C………. ….Description of Survey Equipment 5 pages
Exhibit D…………..Statement of Qualifications for Gray & Pape 11 pages
Exhibit E. ………….CV Bradley M. McDonald, Gray & Pape 23 pages
Exhibit F…………...Curation Agreement 1 page
Exhibit A Proposal for verification of a site believed to be the remains of the 18th century Spanish warship
La Galga located on the Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge
Submitted by
Brad McDonald Gray & Pape, Cultural Resources Consultants On behalf of John L. Amrhein, Jr., Maritime Historian
February, 2008
Background
On August 18, 1750, six Spanish ships and one Portuguese vessel cleared Havana, Cuba for Cadiz, Spain. On August 24, they encountered a hurricane off of the north coast of Florida and were propelled by the Gulf Stream and hurricane winds up the coast of North America. Three vessels were lost on the coast of North Carolina, two made it into Norfolk, Virginia, a zumaca called the Nuestra Señora de Mercedes ran ashore six leagues north of Cape Charles, Virginia and on September 5, 1750, the 56 gun warship, La Galga, who was the escort to the treasure ships, drove ashore on Assateague Island, Virginia.
La Galga came to rest in shallow water partially submerged. Her first deck of guns was covered with two feet of water. Fortunately no one was lost at sea but five individuals drowned while attempting to swim ashore. Don Daniel Huony, the captain of the ship, was told that they were on Assateague Island, near the Maryland-Virginia border, and on the Virginia side. The captain and crew left the wreck three days later for Snow Hill, Maryland, and then on to Norfolk, Virginia where they remained until December 31. In early November, he received word that the shipwreck had been determined to be “two ship lengths” inside of Maryland based on a recent survey. No record of this survey exists today, but it is this clue that guides the researcher to ascertaining the location of the shipwreck. The applicant has written in detail about the history of the ship, the storm, and his conclusions on where the 1750 boundary line would be in evaluating the probable location of the wreck site. This information is contained in the book The Hidden Galleon published October 2007 by the applicant.
The Historical Significance La Galga
The shipwreck of La Galga presents a unique opportunity to archaeologists, historians, and a public that has already demonstrated an interest in shipwrecks in general. And specifically in this case this case, the wreck which is responsible for the legend that the present herd of wild horses on Assateague came from a Spanish shipwreck. These horses and shipwreck legend is world renowned. This applicant has put forth in his book, The Hidden Galleon, that the remains of this shipwreck are buried within the bounds of the Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge which means that it is already property of the federal government and the citizens of the United States. Unlike nearly every other Spanish shipwreck found within the territorial waters of the U.S., discovered by treasure hunters, and then subjected to expensive litigation by all parties, this wreck eagerly awaits excavation and study, and hopefully display to the public.
Legal Questions as to Ownership.
John Amrhein has put forth that the remains of La Galga are buried and contained in the lands of the Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge, owned by the federal government. In 2000, The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erroneously awarded La Galga to Spain. No evidence identifying this vessel was presented to the court. This court was an admiralty court and could only concern itself with issues in navigable waters. The ship awarded to Spain in that litigation lays in the ocean a mile and a half from the site suggested by Amrhein. The Commonwealth of Virginia does not acknowledge this ocean location as La Galga. The details of this are described in The Hidden Galleon. Spain would be barred from claiming ownership of La Galga in a different location under the legal principle of res adjudicata. It is doubtful that Spain would object to a government supervised identification, evaluation, and hopefully, excavation and display of one of their former warships that has become part of our national heritage.
The Proposed Survey is Mandated by Law.
According to the National Historic Preservation act of 1966 as amended, it is the policy of the federal government to identify, evaluate, and nominate to the National Register and/or World Heritage List historic properties and to encourage private initiates in historic preservation. In 2003, President Bush signed Executive Order 13287, the Preserve America Initiative, which requires federal agencies to identify and evaluate historic properties under their control. It also emphasizes the importance in incorporating historic properties into the economic development plans of local communities. The popularity of the Assateague horses and the shipwreck legend concerning their origin is interwoven in the economies of Accomack County, Virginia, and Worcester County, Maryland.
Exhibit B-1 Proposed Survey Area
*
38°
75
° 15
Survey Area Shaded. See Exhibit B-2 for detail and B-3 for aerial photograph. Exhibit B-2 Enlarged Survey Area
E A B
Lat. 38°
F C
D
A. 38 14’ 49.2” N 75 16’ 28.36 E Survey Area I. A, B, C, D- area believed to contain B. 38 13’ 49.2” N 75 16’ 9.91” E the remains of La Galga. C. 37 51’ 21.6” N 75 16’ 43.23” E D. 37 46’ 40.2” N 75 16’ 27.15” E Survey Area II. A, C, E, F - area believed to contain artifacts from wreck and from the 200 crew camped E. 38 18’ 30.6” N 75 16’ 54.26” E here for three days following the wreck. F. 37 55” 3.6” N 75 16’ 42.91” E Exhibit B-3
Aerial photo fromThe Hidden Galleon page 356 Portable Cesium Magnetometer/ Gradiometer Model G-858 A Professional Magnetic Mapping System For Minerals, Petroleum and Environmental/Search
High Sensitivity — Easily Detect a Single Drum Buried 6 Meters Very Fast — Cover Two Acres per Hour at 2 Meter Line Spacing Immediate User Feedback — Display Earth's Field Survey Grid, Position and 5 Stacked Survey Profiles Easy-to-use — Produce Hard Copy Maps at Base Site within Minutes, Uses Standard IBM-Compatible Computers, Printers/ Plotters Options for Simultaneous Vertical or Horizontal G-858 Electronic Gradiometer, Differential Console GPS Positioning, Target Analysis Software
The G-858 MagMapper '' system comprises a belt-mounted display/logging console connected to a cesium sensor mounted on a hand-held counterbalanced staff. The console contains electronics to acquire magnetic field data with position and display it on an LCD screen for review and edit. The console stores G-858 Electronic Console showing internal layout and watertight "0" ring seal of the case high volumes of data in memory and transmits it at high speed to a processing computer for detailed analysis.
Operation The MagMapperTM uses a graphical interface to make survey design and data acquisition quick and efficient. A simple survey mode uses line numbers and known "marks" to define the map parameters. Or the user may define the survey by setting up complete grid boundaries in "Map" Mode. During the survey, the operator can see the portion of the grid that has been completed, i.e. his position on the grid and the current data profile. Position information may come from an external GPS or from regularly spaced fiducial marks input by the operator. At any time, the user may switch to "profile" mode to observe the last 5 data lines as stacked profiles. Data are collected in up to 5 separate survey files and transferred via high speed RS232 data link to a computer for further analysis and map generation. A full featured graphical data editing program is provided to MAGNETIC ANOMALY MAP - FIREARM TEST SITE Several different types of firearms together with ammunition, were laid out at a test site. A densely spaced allow repositioning, realignment and survey of magnetometer measurements (1 foot line spacing) was conducted over the site to determine the interpolation of the data. After editing, typical detection thresholds of these common firearms and to ascertain the time required from the start of the layout to a finished map. The map clearly shows the spatial relationship and the relative size of all magnetic the data is formatted in either Surfer objects. for Windows or Geosoft formats for The site measured 66 x 66 ft. and was covered with a series of parallel lines with 1 ft. separation between lines. gridding and contouring. The sensor was held 2 ft. above the ground and the data was collected along each line at a rapid walking speed. The instrument sensitivity was selected to be 0.05 nT at 10 measurements per second. This resulted in a measurement being made each 5 inches along the line or approximately 11,000 individual SPEED AND measurements. The total time required to layout the survey grid is estimated to be 0.5 hour and the time to collect the data was 34 minutes. Thus 4356 sq. feet were surveyed in a little over 1 hour with 2.5 measurements per EFFICIENCY square foot. Downloading the data into the computer and producing a map required an additional 0.5 hour. A G-858 data acquisition offers either commercially available software program, "Surfer for Windows", was used to plot the data. continuous or discrete station recording. Data quality is uniformly high and lower costs are inherent for most projects due to the high sampling For example, a horizontal transverse APPLICATIONS rate of the instrument in continuous gradiometer (dual sensor array held TM mode. This allows the operator to The G-858 MagMapper may orthogonally to the survey profile) be used to locate buried drums or survey an area at a fast walking pace, provides twice the density of coverage covering as much as 10 times more underground storage tanks; to find on tightly spaced survey grids. pipelines, well-heads and other area in a given time period as previous Alternatively, only half the number of magnetometers. Under certain utilities; to search for unexploded profiles are required to obtain normal ordnance, discarded weapons or conditions even lower costs may be coverage at 50% savings in time. achieved by the use of a gradiometer magnetic mines; to locate graves or to widen the search radius. Since standard and readily available archeological sites and assist in computers, printers/ plotters, and forensic investigations; to study tape storage/backup units are geological structure associated with oil employed, Geometrics encourages bearing rock and faulting; to find clients to provide their own mineral deposits and aid in the siting processing hardware. Upon request, of mines and quarries; and in Geometrics will provide a complete research and education. and fully integrated processing station at a nominal price.
DIGITAL QUALITY BASIC SOFTWARE OPTIONAL SOFTWARE The G-858 system produces raw data A basic software package MagMapTM Geometrics is proud to announce the of the highest quality. Data are is supplied as an integral part of the introduction of a new tool in target digitally recorded in compressed form G-858 system and provides: identification and location. Our in high capacity RAM and later • Transfer of the raw magnetometer, recently developed maximum transferred to the base site computer base station and other survey data likelihood dipole pattern matching for permanent storage and to the client PC; software MagAID TM allows the user processing. Sensitivity, resolution and *Standard corrections for position to generate estimations of object x-y recording rate of the cesium position, size and depth using an errors, transients, and time varying TM magnetometer are user-selectable as errors (diurnal) interactive Windows graphical well as mapped survey grid interface. Data is input from Surfer coordinates and display parameters. • Repositioning, linear interpolation for Windows contour maps and The system is ruggedly packaged for and format of corrected data into output takes the form of informative extreme field conditions. Battery life is X,Y, Z ASCII columnar values for icons placed in to the map as well as a minimum 6 hours for the use with Surfer for Windows, itemized target lists. Magnetometer and 3 hours for the Geosoft or other client-supplied Gradiometer with GPS logging. contouring programs. Surfer for WindowsTM by Golden OPTIONAL Software can be employed to grid the GRADIOMETER data and to generate 2D and 3D AND GPS color contour maps with full text An optional gradiometer annotations. See examples in this configuration (horizontal or data sheet. vertical) is available with the addition of a second cesium sensor and staff. The G-858 includes an RS232 port to interface to customer supplied GPS or other data source. Both gradiometer and GPS can enhance the precision of the survey and the definition and delineation of small magnetic anomalies. A selection of user definable field notes describing site conditions can annotate the stored data.
Complete G- 858 held in the normal field carry position
The cesium sensor and staff may be held vertical for rough terrain or G-858 Gradiometer with the areas of heavy brush sensors located in the vertical position
The G-858 MagMapperTM complete and ready for operation includes: electronic console with software for data acquisition, location, display and transfer; aluminum staff; cables to sensor(s), two battery packs, RS232 output cable with 9-pin connector; 110/220 AC charger; carrying harness; operator manual and reusable shipping container. G-858 MAGMAPPER SPECIFICATIONS
MAGNETOMETER/ELECTRONICS Software: Supplied as part of the basic system and including functions for: Operating Principle: Self-oscillating split-beam Cesium Vapor (non Operating Software: radioactive Cs133) with automatic hemisphere switching. Operating Range: 17,000 nT to 100,000 nT 1. Survey Modes: Operating Zones: For highest signal-to-noise ratio, the sensor long axis should be a. Search survey b. oriented at 45', ±30' to the earth's field angle, but operation will continue through Simple survey 45', ±35'. Sensor is automatic hemisphere switching. c. Map survey, station or continuous d. Sensitivity: 90% of all reading will fall within the following Peak-to Peak envelopes: Base station 0.05 nT at 0.1 sec cycle rate 2. Data acquisition/ display: a. Acquire and store data and survey functions. 0.03 nT at 0.2 sec cycle rate b. Display profiles, total field to 0.1 nT resolution, gradient 0.02 nT at 0.5 sec cycle rate (differential) to 0.1 nT, survey/map parameters and diagnostics. 0.01 nT at 1.0 sec cycle rate PC Support Software for installation on customer or Geometrics supplied Information Bandwidth: < 0.004 nT / √HzRMS) data processing computer: Heading Error: < ± 1 nT 1. Data transfer and corrections: Gradient Tolerance: > 500 nT / inch >20,000 nT / meter a. Transfer of data from the field Magnetometer, Gradiometer, Differential GPS, or Base station to PC. Temperature Drift: 0.05 nT per 'C b. Diurnal correction using base station data. Cycle Rate: Variable from 0.1 sec to 1 hr in 0.1 sec steps or by external trigger. c. Processing the corrected data into ASCII values of XYZ for the Data Storage: Nonvolatile RAM with capacity for 8 hrs of Magnetometer time, event magnetometer and/or X,Y,ZI,Z2,Z3 for the gradiometer. marks, field notes, location, or 3 hrs of Gradiometer and GPS at maximum sample 2. Optional bundled "Surfer for Windows" by Golden. Provides data rates. presentation/plotting into a contour map or 3D isomagnetic map with Text annotation and color blends. Audio Output: 1. Audio tone of earth's field variation, pitch and volume adjustable. (Search) MECHANICAL 2. Audio pulse each 1 second (Pace metronome). Sensor: 23/8" dia., 63/4" long, 12 ounces (6cm x 15 cm, 340 grams) Staff/Harness: Staff 3. Alarm for loss of signal, low battery or Quality Control setting exceeded for Magnetometer or Gradiometer, 1.5 lb to 2.5 lb (0.9 kg to 1.1 kg). Data Output: Three wire RS232 standard serial port, optional continuous real time Nylon chest harness with cables attached, 2 lb to 3 lb (1 kg to 1.3 kg) Battery: 3" H, transmittal of data via RS232 to PC. Total memory output transfer time less than 5 5" W, 8" L, 3.5 lbs (8 cm x 13 cm x 20 cm, 1.6 kg) attaches to harness. min. at 115,200 KBaud. Visual Output: 320 x 200 graphic liquid crystal display, day light visible with Console: 6" W, 3" H, 11" L, 3.5 lbs. (15 cm x 8 cm x 28cm, 1.6 kg), attaches to selectable outputs for: harness. Magnetic effect less than I nT at 4 ft I. Data display: Up to 5 stacked profiles, real time or review mode. Survey grid showing boundaries and position. 2. All system setup functions, e.g., memory status, data transfer, sample ENVIRONMENTAL time. Operating Temperature: -25°C to +50°C (-13°F to +122°F) 3. All Survey setup functions, e.g., survey profile number and direction, station Storage Temperature: -35°C to +60°C (-30°F to +140°F) Water or GPS number, test line number. Tight: To 3 ft (0.9 m) depth Shock: Drop 3 ft on a hard surface 4 Survey monitoring functions, e.g., total field, noise level, profile number x or xy coordinates. without damage 5. System diagnostics e.g., lamp brightness, signal level, battery state. Internal Clock: Resolution of 0.1 sec, drift: < I sec/day OPTIONS 1. Gradiometer, horizontal and/or vertical configuration Battery Life: 2. GPS navigation (real time differential with radio link to GPS base 1. 12 VDC rechargeable gel cell, 6 hrs Magnetometer or 3 hrs Gradiometer usage. station or FM-transmitted RTCM codes) Magnetic effect less than I nT at 4 ft. 2. Internal backup battery for clock and 3. MagAID Anomaly Identification Software, for use in estimating nonvolatile RAM position, size and depth of source bodies and buried objects.
GEOMETRICS, INC. 2190 Fortune Drive, San Jose, CA 95131, USA (408) 954-0522 • Fax (408) 954-0902 • E-mail: [email protected] GEOMETRICS Europe Manor Farm Cottage, Galley Lane, Great Brickhill, Bucks, England MK17 9AB
44-1525-261874 • Fax 44-1525-261867 GEOMETRICS China Rooms 2509-2511, Tower A, Full Link Plaza, #18 Chaoyangmenwai Dajie, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100020, People's Republic of China • 8610-6588-1126 (1127 ... 1130) • Fax 8610-6588-1162 Geometrics 858 deployed with GPS interface. See attached operator manual. GRAY & PAPE, INC. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
Gray & Pape, Inc., is a multidisciplinary firm specializing in full service cultural resources management and historic preservation services. The firm is headed by President, W. Kevin Pape. Our corporate office is located in Cincinnati, Ohio. Our Mid- Atlantic Regional Office is located in Richmond, Virginia, and is managed by Bradley McDonald. We have a staff of 49, including persons with experience in all phases of cultural resources studies from the analysis of historic/cultural landscapes to archaeological/historical site survey and literature search to full-scale excavations and data recovery. Other in-house capabilities include report production, photography, graphics, cartography, historical research, prehistoric lithics and ceramics analysis, historic artifact analysis, faunal and floral analysis, and computerized data analysis. We have close working relationships with professionals and firms specializing in radiocarbon dating, geomorphological analysis, chemical analysis, and landscape architecture.
SERVICES OFFERED
Regulatory Compliance Studies: Section 106 and NEPA ! Phase I, II, III Archaeological & Historical Resource Investigations ! Section 106 and NEPA Integration ! Public Coordination & Participation ! Preparation of MOAs & PAs ! Cultural Resource Scoping Studies for NEPA ! Resource Sensitivity Modeling & Alternatives Analysis
Historic Preservation and Planning Services ! Architectural & Historical Surveys ! National Register of Historic Places Nominations ! Investment Tax Credit Applications ! Architectural Restoration & Rehabilitation ! Corporate, Community, & Land Use Histories ! Historic District Design Review Guidelines ! Integrated Cultural Resource Management Plans ! Community Preservation Planning & Heritage Tourism ! Public Interpretation Plans
Technical Services ! HABS/HAER Resource Documentation ! Geomorphology & Geoarchaeology ! GIS Analysis & Data Management ! GPS, PenMap, Digital Cartography ! Laboratory Services & Ethnobotanical Analysis ! Publication & Exhibit Design
Gray & Pape has an established reputation with its clients and regulatory agencies for understanding the intricacies of CRM planning, permitting, and project implementation. We apply that understanding through strategic negotiations with regulatory agencies and consensus building with communities. Gray & Pape has maintained an office in Richmond, Virginia, since 1992 and has largely undertaken cultural resources survey for natural gas pipelines, military facilities, and transportation corridors. Gray & Pape has substantial experience in conducting all phases of cultural resources investigations on both areal and corridor projects. We have positive working relationships with Federal regulatory agencies and State Historic Preservation Offices involved in the Section 106 permitting process. The company is able to mobilize rapidly in response to the needs of its clients, providing them with excellent service. Our project experience encompasses a broad geographical area including the Midwest and the Mid- Atlantic regions. The company also maintains positive working relationships with cultural resources professionals beyond our current operating area, so that we can be responsive to all of our clients' needs.
The historic preservation staff at Gray & Pape consists of four individuals who are very experienced in the preparation of National Register of Historic Places nominations, historic preservation certification applications for investment tax credit rehabilitation projects, historic building surveys, Section 106 review reports, preservation planning, walking tour brochures, and historic building guide booklets. The staff is knowledgeable of the techniques of historical research in many different states, as well as American architectural history, and historic building rehabilitation practices and design guidelines. They are skilled in giving public presentations and working with community representatives. The staff has prepared comprehensive cultural resource inventories (including the use of oral histories to preserve folk traditions), and has worked with city agencies and planning commissions to prepare historic preservation planning documents.
Our key personnel are familiar with all federal and state regulations concerning the identification and preservation of historic, archaeological, and architectural resources. The qualifications of our senior staff satisfy National Park Service guidelines and the standards promulgated by the Society of Professional Archaeologists. In addition, we have staff members certified to conduct investigations at hazardous materials sites, in accordance with U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration's 29 CFR 1910.120 requirement. Gray & Pape has undertaken cultural resources studies for a wide range of clients, including both governmental agencies and private sector companies. We take great pride in the high return ratio that we have generated with our clients.
The laboratories in both Gray & Pape offices are fully equipped to process, store, and analyze all materials recovered in the field. We have wet/dry laboratory facilities for washing, sorting, and cataloging artifacts and other collected specimens, flotation of soil samples, and secure storage areas for temporary curation of artifacts. The labs also include extensive comparative collections of lithic and faunal materials.
To provide archival and publication quality photography, Gray & Pape maintains a complete photographic studio and dark rooms including large-format photo- documentation to HABS/HAER standards, special site documentation (e.g., in situ human remains), artifact photographs and photomicrography. For graphics and report production, Gray & Pape has a graphics department with a full complement of drafting and graphics equipment including a GPS/GIS Workstation, multimedia software such as Adobe Acrobat, and large-format printing capabilities.
The Technical Services Group of Gray & Pape offers a wide range of support services. Members of the Geographic Information Systems/Electronic Mapping (GIS/EM) Department interact directly with project principals, department heads, and client representatives in the project planning process (proposal, pre- and post-field) to ensure appropriate levels of effort and scheduling for each task involved in the project. Project specific strategies are set for collection, management, editing, archiving and output of spatial data. Throughout the process, the GIS/EM Department maintains control over location, version and status of electronic mapping and GIS files and their associated metadata.
SPECIFIC ELECTRONIC MAPPING CAPABILITIES
Gray & Pape has developed an innovative approach to the management of large- scale cultural resource investigations. Through the use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Gray & Pape has created a single, dynamic system that establishes a real- time link between project data and project geography. This system is used to manage all aspects of the project including the inventory of resource locations and attributes, management of survey logistics, data analysis, and the graphic presentation of project corridors with data overlays.
The GIS is used to develop a base map from data provided by the project client. This reference is used to map the locations of all cultural resources identified through state site file, archival, aerial photographic, and historic cartographic research. A database is created for each resource so that resource attributes can be analyzed and transferred to the client in Computer-Aided Drafting (CAD) format as the project develops and decisions about feasible project alternatives are made. Further, three Gray & Pape staff members have recently completed the one-week MicroStation Basic course offered by the VDOT. The addition of this CAD program to our software package has offered Gray & Pape more flexibility with engineering maps and drawings by allowing project managers and graphic artists to add cultural resource data directly to these files.
The survey sampling design for field investigations is aided by the GIS that is used to delineate zones of high resource probability in the study area. It is also used to generate pre-fieldwork maps of survey sample loci that are used to provide accurate control over the provenience of field observations. The system is designed to integrate Global Positioning System (GPS) field data into the GIS base map. Gray & Pape has the capability to use GPS to locate survey units and cultural resources within project corridors with accuracies of 1 to 5 meters. Analysis of the results from identification (Phase I) surveys is aided by the ability of the GIS to integrate resource and project databases with project geography. Use of the GIS system provides an economical benefit to the project by increasing the accuracy, efficiency, timeliness, and communication of project information without the need for a concomitant increase in labor hours.
The PenMap is a software package that enables a pen-operated computer to be used as a very sophisticated data collector. This system allows the operator to see and correct map data as it is collected from any one of a variety of instrument types and brands (including Gray & Pape’s total stations and GPS). It is also possible to sketch freehand or enter coordinate data into the map, and to attach significant amounts of descriptive information to each map feature. The resultant map file is essentially a field- created CAD drawing and GIS combined. The map elements can be exported directly into MicroStation or AutoCAD for creation of a finished map.
With our broadband Internet access, we have the ability to locate, download and process the substantial environmental GIS datasets available on-line. In addition, these resources, along with aerial photography databases, such as TerraServer, available on- line, are utilized to look for areas of disturbance or other factors that may reduce the overall size of the project area, thereby reducing the time and cost of the project.
AutoCAD and ArcView applications allow us to utilize current Geographic Information System technology in data analysis and digital map production. Gray & Pape's GIS technology is compatible with most industry standards such as Intergraph, GRASS, IDRISI, and ArcInfo. Principal Investigators and researchers are equipped with state of the art notebook computers to increase their flexibility in data collection, analysis, and report preparation. All Archaeologists and Field Directors also are equipped with mobile telephones.
EFFECTIVE PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Gray & Pape achieves rapid results while maintaining close coordination with the client and state and federal oversight agencies. The firm employs a system of efficient management and logistical techniques for undertaking large-scale, multi-task projects. This system enables us to maintain a high level of consistency and quality control over work while allowing us to rotate and deploy multiple teams over the course of the project. By maintaining a full-time support staff, our Project Managers can focus on technical matters rather than administrative and support issues. Quality assurance begins in the early stages of the project (Figure 1). After a Notice to Proceed is issued, and prior to the beginning of fieldwork, the project’s Principal Investigator, Field Director, Office Manager, Laboratory Director, and other supporting personnel meet to discuss the timeline and schedule, technical components, and budgetary limits and concerns in a Pre- Field scheduling meeting. The control of quality extends into the fieldwork component of the project as well. The Field Director is charged with the responsibility of making sure that individuals living within the project area are properly notified and informed of the work that will be performed in the surrounding area. After fieldwork is completed, project management staff, with the addition of personnel from the Graphics and Editing Departments gather in a Post-Field meeting to discuss the schedule for the writing, editing, and production of the technical report. Once a technical report is completed, it is subjected to at least two stages of editing for grammar and content.
ABILITY TO RESPOND QUICKLY AND MEET SCHEDULES
Gray & Pape prides itself on quick response time. The table below demonstrates our average response times for submitting proposals after receiving a request, beginning fieldwork after receiving a Notice to Proceed, and submitting a management summary or draft report after completing fieldwork for Identification projects to the VDOT over the last 3 years (Table 1).
Figure 1. Flow Chart Depicting Project Scheduling
Notice to Proceed
P.I. Assigned Pre-field Fieldwork Post-field to Project Scheduling Scheduling
Reporting/ Editing Correction Production Delivery Laboratory Editing to Client
Table 1. Average Response Times for Identification (Phase I) Projects Year RFP & PD NTP & FW FW & DS Number of Projects per Year 1998 8.8 12.4 35.6 6 1999 5.23 10.4 34 19 2000 9.1 14.6 22.35 20 2001 12.7 11.6 23.625 18 Avg 8.975 12.25 28.8 16 RFP Request for Proposal NTP Notice to Proceed DS Draft Submittal PD Proposal Date FW Fieldwork
ABILITY TO MULTI-TASK CONCURRENTLY
As a CRM firm working in both the public and private sectors, Gray & Pape has conducted hundreds of projects with overlapping fieldwork and reporting schedules. Under a major on-call contract to Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation since 1987, staff has performed numerous multiple, simultaneous delivery orders on corridor surveys that have required from 10 to 60 fieldworkers. These projects, under stringent FERC schedules, required both rapid field deployment and subsequent reporting. Our ability to handle multiple delivery orders simultaneously has been demonstrated with VDOT as well. Almost all of the Identification (Phase I) projects conducted during the past three years for the VDOT were undertaken concurrently, i.e., usually two, and often three projects were underway during the same 30-day period. In addition, Evaluation (Phase II) projects and Data Recovery/Mitigation (Phase III) projects were simultaneously undertaken.
ABILITY TO HANDLE ACCELERATED SCHEDULES
Our contract with the VDOT has occasionally presented very accelerated schedules (Table 2). As a result, Gray & Pape has shown the ability to complete projects in 1/3 less time than a regular project for the VDOT. All rush jobs were completed within requested budgetary constraints; other VDOT jobs that were handled concurrently with rush jobs also were completed within time and budget constraints.
Table 2. Average Response Times for Requested Rush Projects Project Year Phase RFP & NTP & FW & PS FW DS Robertson Bridge 2000 II 9 8 17 Route 17 2000 I 23 10 42 Orange County/Litchfield 2001 I 5 2 1 Isle of Wight/Rt. 620 2001 II 10 1 14 Norfolk and Western Railway 2001 II 11 5 14 Avg. 11.6 5.2 17.6
KEY PERSONNEL
The firm retains a large staff of qualified archaeologists, historians, architectural historians, historic preservation specialists, graphic artists, and technical and administrative support personnel. Gray & Pape provides its employees with state-of-the- art tools, equipment, and facilities, and continually upgraded research resources. Gray & Pape hires individuals with multiple skills and supports specialized training of its staff to increase the diversity of services available to our clients. Brief resumes of Richmond and Cincinnati office personnel include:
Bradley McDonald serves as the Regional Manager of the Richmond Mid-Atlantic office. Mr. McDonald holds a M.A. in Anthropology from the College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia (1994), and a B.A. in Historic Preservation from Mary Washington College in Fredericksburg, Virginia (1990). Prior to joining the staff of Gray & Pape, Mr. McDonald was the Managing Director of Cultural Resources, Inc. in Fredericksburg, Virginia and a Project Manager with R. Christopher Goodwin and Associates, Inc. in their Hampton, Virginia office. Mr. McDonald has considerable experience directing all phases of archaeological research for Sections 106 and 110 compliance projects including field investigation and laboratory analysis of prehistoric and historic archaeological resources. Additionally, he has prepared numerous technical reports that present the results of survey, testing, excavation, and analysis. He has performed investigations on Early Archaic through Late Woodland/Contact period prehistoric sites and has worked on a number of seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth century historic sites. Although Mr. McDonald has experience with a variety of prehistoric chronological periods, his primary area of interest and expertise lies in historic period domestic and farmstead and Civil War period sites. Bradley McDonald has directed numerous compliance projects in the Mid-Atlantic United States. He has successfully completed projects on behalf of federal public agencies including the United States Navy and the United States Army Corps of Engineers. He has also conducted projects with state and municipal agencies including the Virginia Department of Transportation and the Virginia Department of Parks and Recreation. Mr. McDonald has additionally executed projects with a number of private sector clients such as natural gas companies, power companies, and architectural/engineering firms, and nonprofit foundations.
Ms. Lena Sweeten has worked as an Historian and Historic Preservation Consultant for ten years. She earned a B.A. with a double major in History and Government from Western Kentucky University in 1995 and a M.A. in Public History with an emphasis in Historic Preservation in 1998. Her continuing education has included in-depth training in NEPA and Section 106 compliance, downtown redevelopment, and construction management. Ms. Sweeten has managed a wide variety of projects in the Midwest and Mid-Atlantic states. In her capacity as historian and principal investigator, she has been involved in historic architectural surveys for transportation, fiber optics, public utilities, and gas pipeline projects in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, New Hampshire, New York, Ohio, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. She has prepared state-funded architectural inventories and National Register nominations of cultural resources, as well as HABS/HAER documentation reports for engineering and architectural resources. Ms. Sweeten also has advised real estate developers on more than a dozen rehabilitation projects utilizing Federal investment tax credits.
Elizabeth G. Jordan (Ph.D. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey) is an anthropologically-trained historical archaeologist whose research interests in gender, colonial slavery, and the African Diaspora, have afforded her opportunities to work in various parts of the world, including Virginia, Jamaica, Ghana, South Africa, and Mauritius. Dr. Jordan conducted her doctoral research in Cape Town, South Africa, where she used archaeological, archival, and oral historical data to reconstruct the social, cultural, and material lives of slave washerwomen and their descendants over time. This research was funded by Fulbright IIE, as well as a series of small grants awarded by The Graduate School at New Brunswick and The Center for Human Evolutionary Studies (CHES) at Rutgers.
Prior to embarking on her graduate career, Dr. Jordan spent nearly four years working for the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation’s Department of Archaeological Research where she participated in, and ultimately directed, a number of Section 106 and compliance projects in the Mid-Atlantic region. During this time she not only developed a solid foundation in the recovery, analysis, and interpretation of eighteenth-century material culture, but gained extensive experience in public archaeology, working closely with the National Park Service, both at Jamestown and Yorktown. Since then Dr. Jordan has greatly enhanced her knowledge of colonial-period archaeology, working with international teams in a number of cross-cultural contexts. In her current capacity as Principal Investigator with Gray & Pape, Dr. Jordan remains committed to problem- oriented, empirically-based, and socially-responsible archaeological practice.
Thomas Fugate joined Gray & Pape, Inc. in July of 1996 as an intern through the Certificate in Historic Preservation program at the University of Cincinnati. During his internship, Mr. Fugate gained experience in archaeological field work, laboratory techniques, and the production of report quality graphics. Subsequently he has become a full time Archaeologist, and he recently completed his Masters Degree in Anthropology at the University of Cincinnati. Mr. Fugate was also an adjunct faculty member at Northern Kentucky University for the fall 1996 semester.
Since joining Gray & Pape, Inc., Mr. Fugate has served as Field Director for several large-scale corridor projects including the Lakehead Pipe Line Company System Expansion Program II Corridor in Illinois, the Alliance Pipeline in Illinois, and the Vector Pipeline in Indiana. Mr. Fugate has served as Field Director for Phase II investigations in Illinois and Phase I archaeological surveys in Indiana, Illinois, Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, Texas, and West Virginia. In the course of degree work, he participated in field schools at Monticello, in Virginia, in 1981, and the Upper Basin in the Kaibab National Forest, Arizona, in 1996. More recently, Mr. Fugate has served as Principal Investigator for a variety of gas and oil pipeline projects in eastern Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi.
In addition to archaeological fieldwork, Mr. Fugate has conducted archival research in Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, New York, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. His research on the Cincinnati and Whitewater Canal Tunnel near North Bend, Ohio, has been included in a National Register nomination. On September 25, 1996 the results of this research was presented at a meeting jointly sponsored by the Canal Society of Ohio, the Cincinnati Historical Society, the Cincinnati Preservation Association, and the Cleves-Three Rivers Historical Society.
Mr. Fugate has passed Radiological Worker I Training for the Fernald DOE site in Hamilton County, Ohio, allowing unescorted entry into certain controlled areas at that site, including Radiation Areas, Fixed Contamination Areas, Soil Contamination Areas, and some Radioactive Materials Areas. Mr. Fugate currently serves as a Principal Investigator of archaeology for the Richmond office.
Robert D. Clarke serves as a Project Archaeologist. He has 15 years of experience in the cultural resources management field. From 1985 to 1988 he worked for a James Madison University Archaeological Research Center as assistant laboratory director. While in this position, he was responsible for prehistoric and historic analysis. His special emphasis was lithic analysis and nineteenth century ceramics and glass. From 1988 to 1990, Mr. Clarke worked on a variety of sites including prehistoric and eighteenth and nineteenth historic sites. These projects were located in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, Virginia, West Virginia, and North Carolina. Positions held during this period include field technician and field director. Since 1993, Mr. Clarke has worked for Gray & Pape as a field director and project archaeologist. His experience with Gray & Pape has included site file and literature searches, historic documentary research, disturbance assessment, field directing of cultural resource surveys, archaeological testing and data recovery phases of both prehistoric and historic sites, and the interpretation and reporting of the results of field work.
Royce A. McNeal serves as the Archaeologist and Laboratory Supervisor. Ms. McNeal has 18 years experience in cultural resources management in the academic, non-profit, and private sectors. Her academic affiliations were with Radford University, James Madison University and the College of William and Mary. Her non-profit work was with the Archaeological Society of Virginia of the New River Chapter and University of Kentucky. Ms. McNeal has four years of laboratory supervisory experience with Gray & Pape Inc. Having worked in eight states and District of Columbia, she has a geographic range of experience from the Midwest to the Middle Atlantic. She holds a certificate through the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in Hazardous Materials Incident Response Operations (165.5). In previous positions she has served as Assistant Laboratory Director in the Cincinnati Office of Gray & Pape. Her expertise lies in her ability to perform both historic and prehistoric artifact identification and cataloging. Her historic experience includes eighteenth century urban and rural domestic sites, nineteenth and twentieth century domestic sites, urban and rural sites, and industrial sites. Ms. McNeal has experience in the identification and cataloging of Late Archaic through Late Woodland artifacts, lithics materials, and limited experience with prehistoric ceramics identification.
Cincinnati Staff Providing Additional Support
Ms. Ruth G. Myers is the GIS/Electronic Mapping Department Director. She has a B.A. in Anthropology from Indiana University (1979), with a specialization in archaeology, and completed course work for an M.A. in conservation archaeology from Southern Illinois University at Carbondale (1980-1985). She also has recently completed a M.S. in Geography at Miami University of Ohio (2001) with a specialty in Geographic Information Systems (GIS).
As director of the GIS/Electronic Mapping Department, Ms. Myers coordinates the flow of geospatial information for each project through the various analysis and production tools available to Gray & Pape. She has worked extensively with ArcView GIS and is familiar with other GIS, mapping and database software such as ArcINFO, AutoCAD, Paradox, Excel and Access. She also has specialized training in database design, statistics, global positioning system (GPS) applications, geophysical investigation methods (remote sensing), geomorphology, human osteology and mortuary site analysis, lithic analysis, technical writing and scientific illustration. Her years of experience in archaeology and cultural resource management have given her the skills needed to design and implement GIS and mapping projects that will successfully accomplish the goals of a project. Ms. Myers has worked extensively in the private contracting domain, first for Resource Analysts, Inc. (1985-1986), then for American Archaeological Consultants, Inc. (1986-1989), and currently for Gray & Pape, Inc. (1989-present). Her experience includes directing Phase I survey investigations on national forests, reservoirs, mining and development areas, pipeline corridors, and other types of projects. She has also directed Phase II and III investigations on both historic and prehistoric sites. She designed and currently manages several major CRM-related GIS projects, including the Millennium Pipeline Project (420 miles across southern New York), the Cincinnati Light Rail Project (Kentucky and Ohio), and the Ohio River Scenic Byway (ca. 400 miles through southern Ohio). Her responsibilities have also included project design, predictive modeling, site file and documentary research and technical editing. Ms. Myers has worked on projects in California, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Utah, Virginia, and West Virginia.
Mr. Casey L. Fagin is the Graphic Arts Director at Gray & Pape, Inc., where he designs and produces graphics for reports, interpretive displays and exhibits, and various marketing materials (brochures, pamphlets, and signage) using a variety of traditional and computerized graphic techniques. Mr. Fagin is familiar with both Macintosh and PC based computer graphic design programs including ANAgraph Graphic systems (for large format signage applications), QuarkXpress r.5.0, Corel Draw 8, Aldus Freehand, Photoshop, and Illustrator. With regards to graphic production, he can operate the following production equipment: a Photostat-Repromaster 1600, a Linotronic 230 black and white film processor, a Canon CLC-1000 Color Copier/Laser Printer (Cyclone- driven), and a Arrcus II computer scanner.
REFERENCES
Mr. Steve Walter Project Manager Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. 1133 Fifteenth Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20005-2701 (202) 775-3380
Ms. Kristine L. Brown NEPA Cultural Coordinator Engineering and Environment, Inc. DPW ENRD 19952 North Range Road Building 1220 Fort A.P. Hill, VA 22427 (804) 633-8417
Mr. Raymond Amoruso Project Manager URS Corporation 277 Bendix Road, Suite 500 Virginia Beach, VA 23452 (757) 499-4224
BRADLEY M. MCDONALD Gray & Pape, Inc. 1705 East Main Street Richmond, Virginia 23223 (804) 644-0656 Fax: (804) 643-8119 [email protected]
EDUCATION
B.A., Historic Preservation, Mary Washington College, 1990 M.A., Anthropology, College of William and Mary, 1994
PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS
Society for Historical Archaeology, Archeological Society of Virginia
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
2004-Present Regional Manager, Gray & Pape, Inc., Richmond, Virginia.
2003-2004 Senior Principal Investigator, Gray & Pape, Inc., Richmond, Virginia.
2002-2003 Managing Director and Senior Principal Investigator, Cultural Resources, Inc., Fredericksburg, Virginia.
1999-2002 Principal Investigator, Gray & Pape, Inc., Richmond, Virginia.
1997-1999 Assistant Project Manager, R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc., Hampton, Virginia.
1993-1997 Project Archaeologist, James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc., Williamsburg, Virginia.
1993 Field Technician, James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc., Williamsburg, Virginia.
1991 Historical Researcher, William and Mary Center for Archaeological Research, Williamsburg, Virginia.
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE (cont’d)
1991 Field Technician, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, Williamsburg, Virginia.
1990-1991 Field/Laboratory Assistant, William and Mary Center for Archaeological Research, Williamsburg, Virginia.
1987-1990 Laboratory Assistant, Mary Washington College Center for Historic Preservation, Fredericksburg, Virginia.
1988 Field School Participant, Mary Washington College, Fredericksburg, Virginia.
1986-1990 Architectural Historian/Surveyor, Historic York, Inc., York, Pennsylvania.
SELECTED SUPERVISORY EXPERIENCE
2007 Phase I cultural resources survey of a 275-acre development parcel, Cumberland County, Virginia
2007 Phase I archaeological survey and Phase II evaluation in advance of a proposed sewer line realignment, City of Chesapeake, Virginia
2007 Phase I archaeological survey of a 37-acre development parcel, City of Petersburg, Virginia
2006 Phase I archaeological survey of seven proposed recreation areas at the Lake Gaston Reservoir, Mecklenburg County, Virginia
2006 Phase I archaeological survey along the Route 460 corridor, Southampton County, Virginia
2006 Phase I survey and Phase II evaluation along the Route 655 bridge replacement project, Nelson County, Virginia
2006 Phase IA alternatives analysis of a proposed HRSD sewer line project, James City County, Virginia
2006 Phase I archaeological survey of the Biggie Hunt wetland mitigation area, Mecklenburg County, Virginia
2006 Phase I architectural survey of the proposed Featherfin development tract, Prince Edward County, Virginia
2 SUPERVISORY EXPERIENCE (cont’d)
2006 Phase I architectural survey of the proposed Beech Ridge Wind Farm, Greenbrier County, West Virginia
2006 Phase I cultural resources survey of a 70-acre proposed training facility, Harpers Ferry, West Virginia
2006 Phase I archaeological survey of a 42-acre development parcel, Appomattox County, Virginia
2005 Phase I archaeological survey of a 10 acre parcel at Fort A.P. Hill, Caroline County, Virginia
2005 Phase I cultural resources survey along Three Chopt Road, Henrico County, Virginia
2005 Phase I archaeological survey along Route 613, Dinwiddie County, Virginia
2005 Phase I archaeological survey of the proposed Strasburg wastewater treatment plant expansion, Shenandoah County, Virginia
2005 Phase IA reconnaissance survey of 125 acre parcel in Franklin County, Virginia
2005 Phase I archaeological survey of the proposed CACTF Facility, Fort A.P. Hill, Caroline County, Virginia
2005 Phase I archaeological survey of the proposed AWG Facility, Fort A.P. Hill, Caroline County, Virginia
2005 Phase I archaeological survey of the Peter Jones Site, City of Petersburg, Virginia
2005 Phase I archaeological survey along Cogbill Road, Chesterfield County, Virginia
2005 Archaeological monitoring at Eppington Plantation, Chesterfield County, Virginia
2005 Phase I archaeological survey along Pinetta Road, Gloucester County, Virginia
2005 Phase I cultural resources survey of a proposed development along Mill Creek, Jackson County, West Virginia
2005 Phase I archaeological survey of the proposed Amos FDG Landfill, Jackson County, West Virginia
2005 Phase I archaeological survey and Phase II evaluation of two sites at the proposed Colonial Heights Baptist Church property, Chesterfield County, Virginia
3 SUPERVISORY EXPERIENCE (cont’d)
2004 Phase I archaeological survey in Leesylvania State Park, Fairfax County, Virginia
2004 Phase I archaeological survey in Mason Neck State Park, Fairfax County, Virginia
2004 Phase I archaeological survey and regulatory guidance for the Capital Beltway improvement project, Fairfax County, Virginia
2004 Phase III data recovery of 44JC79 and 44JC1113, James City County, Virginia
2004 Cultural landscape study of the Great Bridge battlefield, City of Chesapeake, Virginia
2004 Archaeological investigations at the Minute Man National Historical Park, Concord, Massachusetts
2004 Archaeological overview and assessment of the Fire Island National Seashore, Suffolk County, New York
2004 Archaeological survey of two parcels at the MOTSU Facility, Southport, North Carolina
2004 Archaeological survey at the proposed Curles Neck Mining Facility, Henrico County, Virginia
2004 Archaeological survey of the proposed Science Museum of Virginia expansion, City of Richmond, Virginia
2003 Phase III excavation of 46GB322, a Middle Woodland period encampment in Greenbrier County, West Virginia
2003 Phase III excavation of 44CC373, a Middle Woodland period encampment in Charles City County, Virginia
2003 Phase II evaluations of nine sites within the Hopyard Farm property, King George County, Virginia
2003 Phase II evaluations of 44PM12 and 44PM13, two Late Woodland village sites, City of Portsmouth, Virginia
2003 Lead contact for the Planning and Phase I survey portions of the United States Navy’s Public-Private Housing Venture Project. Included analysis of all architectural and archaeological resources at Naval installations within Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia.
4 SUPERVISORY EXPERIENCE (cont’d)
2003 Phase I survey of the 350-acre Loudoun County Government Center property, Loudoun County, Virginia
2003 Phase I survey of the 175-acre Loudoun Valley Estates property, Loudoun County, Virginia
2002 Phase I survey of the 15-mile VA Gas Pipeline Corridor, Smythe County, Virginia
2002 Phase I survey of the 250-acre Hopyard Farm property, King George County, Virginia
2002 Phase II evaluation of 44ST456, a nineteenth century plantation complex, Stafford County, Virginia
2002 Analysis of nineteenth century gold and iron ore mining operations within the proposed Whitehall development, Spotsylvania County, Virginia
2002 Phase III excavation of six archaeological sites within the River Road project corridor, Hamilton County, Ohio
2002 Phase III excavation of 15CP56,an early nineteenth century domestic site in Campbell County, Kentucky
2002 Phase I survey and Phase II evaluation of 11 sites, City of Virginia Beach, Virginia.
2002 Archaeological monitoring in association with the Capitol Square utility upgrades, City of Richmond, Virginia.
2002 Archaeological investigations at Hanover Courthouse, Hanover County, Virginia.
2002 Archaeological assessment and Phase I survey of the proposed Chesapeake light rail corridor, City of Chesapeake, Virginia.
2001 Phase I survey of proposed improvements to Route 71, Scott County, Virginia.
2001 Phase I survey of proposed improvements to Interstate 81, Rockingham County and the City of Harrisonburg, Virginia.
2001 Phase I survey of proposed improvements to Route 100, Giles County, Virginia.
2001 Phase II evaluations of Sites 44SN239, 44SN240, 44SN241, and 44SN247, Southampton County, Virginia.
SUPERVISORY EXPERIENCE (cont’d)
5
2001 Phase I survey of proposed improvements to Sliding Hill Road, Hanover County, Virginia.
2001 Phase I survey of a proposed wetland mitigation area, Prince William County, Virginia.
2001 Phase I survey of proposed improvements to Route 250, Highland County, Virginia.
2001 Phase I survey of the proposed Coles Point Wastewater Treatment Plant, Westmoreland County, Virginia.
2001 Phase I survey of the proposed Lewistown Connector Road, Hanover County, Virginia.
2001 Phase I survey of two proposed industrial access roads, Prince William County, Virginia.
2001 Phase I survey of a proposed industrial access road, Orange County, Virginia.
2001 Phase I survey of proposed improvements to Route 71, Scott County, Virginia.
2001 Phase I survey of proposed improvements to Sliding Hill Road, Hanover County, Virginia.
2001 Phase I survey of two proposed industrial access roads, Prince William County, Virginia.
2001 Phase I survey of a proposed industrial access road, Orange County, Virginia.
2001 Phase I survey of proposed improvements to Route 71, Scott County, Virginia.
2000 Phase I survey of two proposed borrow pit areas, Mecklenburg County, Virginia.
2000 Phase I survey along Route 917, Rockingham County, Virginia.
2000 Phase I survey of proposed improvements to Route 11/Route 460, Roanoke County, Virginia.
2000 Phase I survey of proposed improvements to Route 700, Washington County, Virginia.
2000 Phase II evaluation of the old Spotsylvania County Courthouse site (44SP273) and the Penney’s Tavern site (44SP272), Spotsylvania County, Virginia.
2000 Phase II evaluations of seven Woodland resource procurement camps located along the proposed Totopotomoy sewer line, Hanover County, Virginia.
SUPERVISORY EXPERIENCE (cont’d)
6
2000 Phase I survey of proposed improvements to Route 33, New Kent, King William, and King and Queen Counties, Virginia.
2000 Phase II evaluation of Site 44SH363, a twentieth century lime kiln, Shenandoah County, Virginia.
2000 Phase I survey of 25 acres at the proposed site of the Totopotomoy Wastewater Treatment Plant, Hanover County, Virginia.
2000 Phase I survey of proposed improvements to Route 608, Rockbridge County, Virginia.
2000 Phase I survey of proposed improvements to Route 17, City of Chesapeake, Virginia.
1999 Phase I survey of a proposed realignment corridor for Haynes Mill Road in Gloucester County, Virginia.
1999 Phase II evaluation of a late nineteenth-century domestic site (44GL412) located within the proposed Haynes Mill Road realignment corridor, Gloucester County, Virginia.
1999 Phase I survey of a 28,000 foot corridor for the proposed Totopotomoy Creek sewer line, Hanover County, Virginia.
1999 Phase I metal detector survey of three areas near the Hansborough Ridge Civil War encampment, Culpeper County, Virginia.
1999 Phase I survey of proposed improvements to Route 703, Accomack County, Virginia.
1999 Phase I survey of proposed improvements to Route 721, Rockingham County, Virginia.
1999 Phase I survey of proposed improvements to Route 607, Prince Edward County, Virginia.
1999 Phase I survey of three proposed development areas and Phase II evaluation of a Civil War encampment site (44PW917) and an Archaic/Woodland period campsite (44PW912) within Quantico Marine Corps Base, Prince William County, Virginia.
1999 Archaeological assessment of five proposed alternative routes in association with the Route 29 Bypass project, City of Lynchburg and Campbell County, Virginia.
1999 Phase I survey of proposed Warm Springs Turnpike Interpretive Site and Phase II evaluation of nineteenth century domestic/tollhouse site (44BA897), Bath County, Virginia.
1999 Phase I survey of proposed improvements to Route 917, Rockingham County, Virginia. SUPERVISORY EXPERIENCE (cont’d)
7
1998 Phase I survey of the proposed realignment corridor for Rochambeau Drive in York County, Virginia.
1998 Phase II evaluation of a Middle Archaic-Late Woodland prehistoric site (44YO773) located within the proposed Rochambeau Drive realignment corridor in York County, Virginia.
1998 Phase I survey of a proposed wetlands crossing site at the Powhatan Secondary residential development in James City County, Virginia.
1998 Assisted in the creation of a cultural resource management plan for future development at the Defense Supply Center-Richmond installation, Chesterfield County, Virginia.
1998 Phase II evaluation of a Late Archaic prehistoric site (44CF568) located at the Defense Supply Center, Richmond, Chesterfield County, Virginia.
1998 Phase I survey of 20 acres at the NSGA-Northwest military installation in the City of Chesapeake, Virginia.
1998 Assisted in the creation of archaeological predictive model and disturbance assessment for Naval Base Norfolk, City of Norfolk, Virginia.
1998 Phase II evaluation of an early to mid-eighteenth century domestic site (44CS242) located at the NSGA-Northwest military installation in the City of Chesapeake, Virginia.
1998 Phase II evaluation of two Middle to Late Woodland period sites (44YO608 and 44YO458) at FISC Cheatham Annex, York County, Virginia.
1997 Phase I survey of a proposed air terminal site at the Norfolk Naval Air Station, Norfolk Naval Base, Norfolk, Virginia.
1997 Phase I survey of 63 acres at the proposed King’s Creek Plantation development in York County, Virginia.
1997 Phase I survey of the proposed Enterprise Drive connector road, City of Lynchburg, Virginia.
1997 Archaeological monitoring of impacts to a late 19th- and 20th-century neighborhood during the construction of the Norfolk Public Health Center, City of Norfolk, Virginia.
1997 Phase III excavation of a first to second quarter 17th-century domestic site (44JC562) located at the Governor's Land at Two Rivers, Williamsburg, Virginia.
SUPERVISORY EXPERIENCE (cont’d)
8
1997 Archaeological data recovery at a Civil War earthwork at the proposed Bruton Glen subdivision, York County, Virginia.
1997 Phase III excavation of components of two Late Woodland/Contact period Native American village sites (44SK11 and 44SK41) located at the Nansemond River utility line crossings, City of Suffolk, Virginia.
1997 Phase II evaluation of a late 18th-/early 19th-century domestic site (44JC946) within the proposed State Route 5 Alternate right-of-way, James City County, Virginia.
1997 Phase III excavation of a late 17th- and 18th-century component of Warwick Town, located near the Newport News City Farm, City of Newport News, Virginia.
1996 Phase II archaeological significance evaluations of two Late Woodland/Contact period Native American sites associated with village of "Nandsamund" (44SK11 and 44SK41) located in the City of Suffolk, Virginia.
1996 Archaeological investigation of the Pitman Pottery, an early 19th-century kiln site located in Stephens City, Frederick County, Virginia.
1996 Phase I archaeological survey of 25 acres at the Endview plantation property, City of Newport News, Virginia.
1996 Phase IA cultural resources assessment of the 1000 acre Nansemond Ordnance Depot, City of Suffolk, Virginia.
1996 Phase IA cultural resources assessment of the 1000 acre proposed Widewater development, Stafford County, Virginia.
1996 Phase I archaeological survey of 16 acres at the Atlantic Ventures property, James City County, Virginia.
1996 Architectural and archaeological assessment of the late 19th-century Mouquin House, Camp Peary, York County, Virginia.
1996 Phase I archaeological survey of 40 acres at the proposed Widewater development, Stafford County, Virginia.
1996 Phase II evaluation of two Late Woodland period sites (44VB240 and 44VB242) and one mid 17th-century plantation site (44VB241) at the Great Neck Point Disposal Area, City of Virginia Beach, Virginia.
SUPERVISORY EXPERIENCE (cont’d)
9
1996 Phase I survey of 12 acres at the Great Neck Point Disposal Area, City of Virginia Beach, Virginia.
1995 Archaeological and architectural assessment of 44JC839, a third quarter 19th-century log structure located near Barhamsville, James City County, Virginia.
1995 Archaeological assessment of 44JC845, a mid 18th-century tavern site located near Toano, James City County, Virginia.
1995 Phase IA cultural resources assessment of 118 acres at the proposed Druid Hills subdivision, James City County, Virginia.
1995 Phase I survey of 170 acres at the Proposed Stormwater Pond, Richmond International Airport, Henrico County, Virginia.
1995 Phase I survey of 27 acres at the Capital Wetlands Mitigation Area, New Kent County, Virginia.
1995 Phase IA cultural resources assessment of 93 acres at the Capital Wetlands Mitigation Area, New Kent County, Virginia.
1994 Phase II evaluation of 44JC282, a late 18th- and 19th-century farmstead complex located near Toano, James City County, Virginia.
1994 Phase II evaluation of 44JC821, a mid to late 18th-century domestic complex located near Toano, James City County, Virginia.
1994 Phase III excavation of two Archaic period sites (44JC309 and 44JC529), two Middle Woodland period sites (44JC530 and 44JC531) and one mid 18th-century domestic site (44JC23) at Governor's Land at Two Rivers, Williamsburg, Virginia.
1994 Phase I survey of 26 acres at the Capital Wetlands Mitigation Area, New Kent County, Virginia.
1994 Phase I survey of 18 acres at the Corporate Woods Property, City of Virginia Beach, Virginia.
1994 Phase I survey of 75 acres at the Richmond Homes Property, James City County, Virginia.
1993 Phase II evaluations of three 18th- and 19th-century domestic sites (44VB69, 44VB70, 44VB79) at Bayville Farm located in Virginia Beach, Virginia.
SUPERVISORY EXPERIENCE (cont’d)
10
1993 Phase II evaluations of five Late Woodland/Contact period sites (44VB74, 44VB76, 44VB77, 44VB80, and 44VB81) associated with the Native American village of Apasus at Bayville Farm located in Virginia Beach, Virginia.
1993 Phase II evaluations of two 18th- and 19th-century domestic sites (44SK406 and 44SK407) at the Bridgeway Commerce Park located in Suffolk, Virginia.
1993 Phase I survey of 32 acres at the Renick property, James City County, Virginia.
1993 Phase I survey of 10,800 foot pipeline from the Amoco Oil Refinery to the US Naval Fuel and Industrial Supply Center, York County, Virginia.
1993 Phase I survey of 15 acres at the Jones Creek Boat Access property, Isle of Wight County, Virginia.
TECHNICAL REPORTS
1992 Cast Down Your Bucket Where You Are: African-American Family and Society on the Lands of the Yorktown Naval Weapons Station, 1865-1918. William and Mary Center for Archaeological Research. Report submitted to Yorktown Naval Weapons Station, Yorktown, VA.
1993a Phase II Archaeological Significance Evaluations of 44SK406 and 44SK407 at the Proposed Bridgeway Commerce Park, City of Suffolk, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Dominion Resources, Inc., Richmond, VA.
1993b A Report of Archaeological Test Excavations of the Newton House Foundation, Archaeological Site 44KG114, at Caledon Natural Area, King George County, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of State Parks, Richmond, VA.
1993c Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Renick Property, James City County, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Van Kniest, Inc., Williamsburg, VA.
1993d Phase I Archaeological Survey of a Proposed 10,800 Foot Pipeline Right-Of-Way from the York County Amoco Oil Refinery to the US Naval Fuel and Industrial Supply Center, Yorktown, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Colonial Pipeline Company, Atlanta, GA.
TECHNICAL REPORTS (cont’d)
11
1993e Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Jones Creek Public Access Area, Isle of Wight County, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Isle of Wight County Public Recreational Facilities Authority, Carrolton, VA.
1994a Phase I Archaeological Survey of the 28 Acre Proposed Hollywood Casinos Property, City of Hampton, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Langley and McDonald, Inc., Virginia Beach, VA.
1994b Phase I Archaeological Survey of 26 Acres of the Capital Region Airport Commission Wetlands Mitigation Site, New Kent County, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to HDR Engineering, Inc., Richmond, VA.
1994c Treatment Plan for Sites 44SK406 and 44SK407 at the Bridgeway Commerce Park, City of Suffolk, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Dominion Resources, Inc., Richmond, VA.
1994d Treatment Plan for Sites 44VB74, 44VB76, 44VB77, 44VB80, and 44VB81 at Bayville Farm, City of Virginia Beach, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Bayville Farm Associates, Virginia Beach, VA.
1994e Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Corporate Woods Property, City of Virginia Beach, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Devon, USA, Richmond, VA.
1994f Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Richmond Homes Property, James City County, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Langley and McDonald, Virginia Beach, VA.
1994g Phase II Archaeological Significance Evaluations of 44VB69, 44VB70, and 44VB79 at Bayville Farm, City of Virginia Beach, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Bayville Farm Associates, Virginia Beach, VA.
1994h Phase II Archaeological Significance Evaluations of 44VB74, 44VB76, 44VB77, 44VB80, and 44VB81 at Bayville Farm, City of Virginia Beach, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Bayville Farm Associates, Virginia Beach, VA.
TECHNICAL REPORTS (cont’d)
12
1995a Phase I Archaeological Survey of Twelve Acres and Phase II Archaeological Significance Evaluation of Sites 44VB240, 44VB241, and 44VB242 at the Great Neck Point Disposal Area, City of Virginia Beach, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to LACA, Inc., Virginia Beach, VA.
1995b Archaeological Assessment of 44JC845 at the Proposed Stonehouse Development, James City County, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Stonehouse, Inc., Williamsburg, VA.
1995c Phase IA Cultural Resources Assessment of 118 Acres at the Proposed Druid Hills Subdivision, James City County, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Langley and McDonald, Inc., Virginia Beach, VA.
1995d Phase I Archaeological Survey of 170 Acres at the Proposed Stormwater Pond, Richmond International Airport, Henrico County, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to HDR Engineering, Inc., Richmond, VA.
1995e Phase I Archaeological Survey of 27 Acres of the Capital Region Airport Commission Wetlands Mitigation Site, New Kent County, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to HDR Engineering, Inc., Richmond, VA.
1995f Phase IA Cultural Resources Assessment of 93 Acres of the Capital Region Airport Commission Wetlands Mitigation Site, New Kent County, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to HDR Engineering, Inc., Richmond, VA.
1995g Phase II Archaeological Significance Evaluation of 44JC282 and 44JC821 at the Proposed Stonehouse Development, James City County, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Stonehouse, Inc., Williamsburg, VA.
1996a Phase IA Historical and Archaeological Assessment of the 1000 Acre Former Nansemond Ordnance Depot, City of Suffolk, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Foster Wheeler Environmental Group, Livingston, NJ.
1996b Treatment and Data Recovery Plan for Sites 44SK11 and 44SK41 at the Nansemond River 42" and 48" Utility Line Replacement, City of Suffolk, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Michael Baker, Jr., Inc., Virginia Beach, VA. TECHNICAL REPORTS (cont’d)
13
1996c Phase I Archaeological Survey of 25 Acres at the Endview Plantation Property, City of Newport News, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to City of Newport News, VA.
1996d Phase II Archaeological Significance Evaluation of the Andrew Pitman House and Pottery at Site 44FK528, Stephens City, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Virginia Department of Historic Resources, Winchester, VA.
1996e Nansemond River Archaeology: Phase II Archaeological Significance Evaluation of Sites 44SK11, 44SK41, 44SK50, and 44SK210 and a Phase I Archaeological Survey of a 2,000 Feet Along the Nansemond River 42" and 48" Utility Line Replacement, City of Suffolk, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Michael Baker, Jr., Inc., Virginia Beach, VA.
1996f Phase III Plowzone Sampling of the Footprint of a Temporary Gymnasium at Site 44NN278, Newport News City Farm, City of Newport News, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to City of Newport News, VA.
1996g Treatment Plan for Site 44VB241 at the Great Neck Point Disposal Area, City of Virginia Beach, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to LACA, Inc., Virginia Beach, VA.
1997a Phase III Data Recovery Investigations at Site 44JC562, Governor's Land at Two Rivers, James City County, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Governor's Land Associates, Inc., Williamsburg, VA.
1997b Data Recovery Plan for Site 44JC566 at the Governor's Land at Two Rivers, James City County, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Governor's Land Associates, Inc, Williamsburg, VA.
1997c Phase II Archaeological Significance Evaluation of Site 44JC946 Located Within the Alternate Route 5 Corridor at the Powhatan Plantation National Historical Site, James City County, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to James City County Department of Development Management, Williamsburg, VA.
1997d Phase I Archaeological Survey of 40 Acres at Brent Point, Widewater Development, Stafford County, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Dominion Lands, Inc., Richmond, VA.
TECHNICAL REPORTS (cont’d)
14
1997e Archaeological Monitoring of Test Trenching at the Site of the Proposed Norfolk Public Health Center, City of Norfolk, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Armada-Hoffler Construction Company, Norfolk, VA.
1997f Phase II Archaeological Significance Evaluation of Site 44JC839 and Architectural Assessment of a Log Building (047-5001) at the Stonehouse Development, James City County, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Stonehouse Management Co., Williamsburg, VA.
1997g Data Recovery Plan for Sites 44JC562 and 44JC563 at the Governor's Land at Two Rivers, James City County, Virginia. James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. Report submitted to Governor's Land Associates, Inc., Williamsburg, VA.
1997h Archeological Resource Investigation at the Proposed Military Logistics Air Terminal Site at the Naval Air Station, Naval Base Norfolk, Norfolk, Virginia. R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. Report submitted to Shriver and Holland Associates, Norfolk, VA.
1998a Phase I Archeological Investigations of the Proposed King’s Creek Plantation (Phases 1 and 2), York County, Virginia. R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. Report submitted to King’s Creek Plantation, LLC., Williamsburg, VA.
1998b Phase I Archeological Investigations of the Proposed Laxton Road/Enterprise Drive Connector, City of Lynchburg, Bedford County, and Campbell County, Virginia. R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. Report submitted to Hurt and Proffitt, Inc., Lynchburg, VA.
1998c A Supplemental Phase I Identification Survey of the Proposed Rochambeau Drive Relocation Project, York County, Virginia. R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. Report submitted to Langley and McDonald, P.C., Williamsburg, VA.
1998d A Phase II Significance Evaluation of Site 44YO773 at the Proposed Rochambeau Drive Relocation Project, York County, Virginia. R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. Report submitted to York County Development Authority, Yorktown, VA.
1998e A Phase I Archeological Survey of the Proposed Wetlands Crossing Site at the Powhatan Secondary Development, James City County, Virginia. R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. Report submitted to Langley and McDonald, P.C., Williamsburg, VA. TECHNICAL REPORTS (cont’d)
15
1998f A Phase II Significance Evaluation of Site 44CF568 at the Defense Supply Center-Richmond, Chesterfield County, Virginia. R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. Report submitted to Mill Creek Environmental Consultants, Ltd.
1998g Preliminary Cultural Resources Management Plan for Defense Supply Center Richmond (DSCR), Chesterfield County, Virginia. R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. Report submitted to Mill Creek Environmental Consultants, Ltd.
1999a Phase II Significance Evaluations of Sites 44YO608 and 44YO458 at FISC Cheatham Annex, York County, Virginia. R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. Report submitted to TAMS Consultants, Inc.
1999b Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of a Proposed Realignment Corridor of Route 614 and a Phase II Archaeological Evaluation of Site 44GL412, Gloucester County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to the Virginia Department of Transportation, Fredericksburg, VA.
1999c A Supplemental Phase I Archaeological Survey of Three Areas Associated with the Proposed Route 3 and Stevensburg Bypass Project, Culpeper County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to the Virginia Department of Transportation, Fredericksburg, VA.
1999d Archaeological Assessment of Five Proposed Alternatives for the Route 29 Bypass Project, City of Lynchburg and Campbell County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Virginia Department of Transportation, Colonial Heights, VA.
1999e A Phase I Cultural Resources Survey Along Route 703, Accomack County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Virginia Department of Transportation, Suffolk, VA.
1999f A Phase I Archaeological Survey Along Route 721, Rockingham County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Virginia Department of Transportation, Salem, VA.
1999g A Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Warm Springs Turnpike Interpretive Site and Phase II Evaluation of Site 44BA897, Bath County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Virginia Department of Transportation, Salem, VA.
TECHNICAL REPORTS (cont’d) 16
1999h A Limited Phase II Archaeological Evaluation of a Portion of Site 44HN314 Located Within the Proposed Totopotomoy Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent Force Main and the Outfall/Cascade Aerator Structure Location, Hanover County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Hazen and Sawyer, Inc., Raleigh, NC.
1999i Archaeological Survey Along Route 607, Prince Edward County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Virginia Department of Transportation, Colonial Heights, VA.
2000a Phase I Archaeological Investigations Along a Sewer Line Connecting P.S. Number 5 to the Proposed Totopotomoy Wastewater Treatment Plant, Hanover County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Timmons, Richmond, VA.
2000b Archaeological Survey Along Route 917, Rockingham County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Virginia Department of Transportation, Salem, VA.
2000c Archaeological Survey Along Route 33, New Kent, King William, and King and Queen Counties, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Virginia Department of Transportation, Fredericksburg, VA.
2000d Phase I Archaeological Survey of 25 Acres at the Proposed Totopotomoy Wastewater Treatment Plant Site, Hanover County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Hazen and Sawyer, Inc., Raleigh, NC.
2000e Archaeological Identification Survey Along Route 608, Rockbridge County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Virginia Department of Transportation, Salem, VA.
2000f Archaeological Survey of a Proposed Realignment of Route 17 (Alternative C-1 and the Two-Lane Connector Road), City of Chesapeake, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Virginia Department of Transportation, Suffolk, VA.
2000g An Archaeological Survey and Evaluation of the Woodstock Lime Company Site, 44SH363, within the Route 663 Bridge Replacement Project, Shenandoah County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Virginia Department of Transportation, Salem, VA.
TECHNICAL REPORTS (cont’d)
17
2000h Phase I Archaeological Survey of Four Tracts Phase II Evaluations of Sites 44PW912 and 44PW917 at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Fauquier, Prince William, and Stafford Counties, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Environmental Restoration Company, Fredericksburg, VA.
2000i Phase I Archaeological Survey of 25 Acres at the Proposed Totopotomoy Wastewater Treatment Plant Site, Hanover County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Hazen and Sawyer, P.C., Raleigh, NC.
2001a Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of Three Proposed Realignment Corridors Along Sliding Hill Road, Hanover County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Resource International, Ltd., Ashland, VA.
2001b Additional Archaeological Identification Survey Along Route 671, Archaeological Evaluation of Sites 44SN239 and 44SN241, and Additional Testing at Sites 44SN240 and 44SN247, Southampton County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, VA.
2001c Archaeological Identification Survey Along Route 100, Giles County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, VA.
2001d An Archaeological Identification Survey Along Interstate 81, Rockingham County and the City of Harrisonburg, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, VA.
2001e An Archaeological Identification Survey Along Route 71, Scott County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, VA.
2001f A Cultural Resources Identification Survey Along Route 250, Highland County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, VA.
2001g Phase I Archaeological Survey of 31 Acres at the Proposed Fighting Creek Park Site, Powhatan County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Powhatan County, Powhatan, VA.
2001h Archaeological Evaluations of Sites 44SP272 and 44SP273, Within the Route 208 Bypass Project, Spotsylvania County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, VA.
TECHNICAL REPORTS (cont’d)
18
2002a Data Recovery and Mitigation Plan for Archaeological Sites 33HA733, 33HA734, 33HA735, 33HA736, and 33HA737, Associated with the River Road Improvement Project, HAM-US 50-17.69 (PID 20176), City of Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to KZF Design, Cincinnati, OH.
2002b Data Recovery and Mitigation Plan for Archaeological Site 15CP56, Associated with the Proposed Sanitation District No. 1 Eastern Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, Campbell County, Kentucky. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Woolpert, LLP, Cincinnati, OH.
2002c Cultural Resources Assessment and Alternatives Analysis for the Proposed Chesapeake-Virginia Beach, Virginia Light Rail Project, City of Chesapeake and Virginia Beach, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted as part of Environmental Impact Statement to URS/BRW, Inc., Virginia Beach, VA.
2002d Phase I Identification Survey and Phase II Significance Evaluation of Nine Sites Along the Proposed Landstown-West Landing 230KV Transmission Line, City of Virginia Beach, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Dominion Virginia Power, Richmond, VA.
2002e Phase I Archaeological Identification Survey Within the Proposed 15-Mile Virginia Gas Company Pipeline Corridor, Smythe County, Virginia. Cultural Resources, Inc. Report submitted to Williamsburg Environmental Group, Williamsburg, VA.
2002f Phase I Archaeological Identification Survey of the Proposed Hopyard Farm Property, King George County, Virginia. Cultural Resources, Inc. Report submitted to Hazel Land Companies, Fredericksburg, VA.
2002g Phase II Archaeological and Architectural Significance Evaluation of Site 44ST456, Stafford County, Virginia. Cultural Resources, Inc. Report submitted to Silver Companies, Inc., Fredericksburg, VA.
2002h Archaeological Assessment and Documentary Analysis of Nineteenth Century Gold and Iron Ore Mining Operations Within the Whitehall Property, Spotsylvania County, Virginia. Cultural Resources, Inc. Report submitted to Wellford Construction, Inc., Fredericksburg, VA.
2003a Data Recovery and Mitigation Plan for Site 46GB322 at the Greenbrier Sporting Club, Greenbrier County, West Virginia. Cultural Resources, Inc. Report submitted to Williamsburg Environmental Group, Williamsburg, VA.
TECHNICAL REPORTS (cont’d)
19
2003b Data Recovery and Mitigation Plan for Site 44CC373 at the Byrdwood Plantation Property, Charles City County, Virginia. Cultural Resources, Inc. Report submitted to Williamsburg Environmental Group, Williamsburg, VA.
2003c Phase I Archaeological Identification Survey of the Loudoun Valley Estates Property, Loudoun County, Virginia. Cultural Resources, Inc. Report submitted to Toll Brothers, Ashburn, VA.
2003d Phase I Archaeological Identification Survey of the Loudoun County Government Center Property, Loudoun County, Virginia. Cultural Resources, Inc. Report submitted to Williamsburg Environmental Group, Williamsburg, VA.
2003e Data Collection and Phase I Reconnaissance Survey Conducted in Support of the United States Navy Public Private Venture (PPV) Housing Project. Cultural Resources, Inc. Report submitted to Sadler and Whitehead Architects, PLC and LANTDIV, Norfolk, VA.
2004a Phase I Archaeological Survey of Several Proposed Picnic Areas, Leesylvania State Park, Fairfax County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Richmond, VA.
2004b Phase I Archaeological Survey of Several Proposed Picnic Areas, Mason Neck State Park, Fairfax County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Richmond, VA.
2004c Phase III Archaeological Data Recovery of Sites 44JC79 and 44JC1113, James City County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Williamsburg Plantation, LLC, Williamsburg, VA.
2004d Cultural Landscape Report for the Great Bridge Battlefield, City of Chesapeake, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to the American Battlefield Protection Program, Washington, D.C.
2004e Archaeological Investigations at the Minute Man National Historical Park, Concord, Massachusetts. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to the National Park Service, Lowell, MA.
2004f Archaeological Overview and Assessment, Fire Island National Seashore, Suffolk County, New York. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to the National Park Service, Lowell, MA.
TECHNICAL REPORTS (cont’d)
20
2004g Phase I Archaeological Survey of Two Parcels at the MOTSU Facility, Southport, North Carolina. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to AH Environmental Consultants, Inc., Newport News, VA.
2004h Phase I Archaeological Survey at the Proposed Curles Neck Mining Facility, Henrico County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Vulcan, Inc.
2004i Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Science Museum of Virginia Discovery Park Expansion, City of Richmond, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Science Museum of Virginia, Richmond, VA.
2005a Phase I Archaeological Survey of a 10-Acre Villaboro Parcel at Fort A.P. Hill, Caroline County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Fort A.P. Hill, Virginia.
2005b Phase I Cultural Resources Survey along Three Chopt Road, Henrico County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Earth Tech, Inc., Richmond, Virginia.
2005c Phase I Archaeological Survey along Route 613, Dinwiddie County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Louis Berger Group, Richmond, VA.
2005d Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Strasburg Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion, Shenandoah County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to EEE Consulting, Inc., Montpelier, VA.
2005e Phase IA Reconnaissance Survey of 125 Acre Parcel in Franklin County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Engineering and Environment, Inc., Richmond, VA.
2005f Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed CACTF Facility, Fort A.P. Hill, Caroline County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Pacuilli Simmons and Associates, Inc., Fairfax, VA.
2005g Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed AWG Facility, Fort A.P. Hill, Caroline County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Pacuilli Simmons and Associates, Inc., Fairfax, VA.
2005h Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Peter Jones Site, City of Petersburg, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Enteros Design, Inc, Petersburg, VA.
TECHNICAL REPORTS (cont’d)
21
2005i Phase I Archaeological Survey along Cogbill Road, Chesterfield County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Site Blauvelt Engineers, Inc., Richmond, VA
2005j Report on Archaeological Monitoring at Eppington Plantation, Chesterfield County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Chesterfield County Department of Parks and Recreation, Virginia
2005k Phase I Archaeological Survey along Pinetta Road, Gloucester County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to MSA, Inc., Norfolk, VA.
2005l Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of a Proposed Development along Mill Creek, Jackson County, West Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Potesta, Inc., Charleston, WV.
2005m Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Amos FDG Landfill, Jackson County, West Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to American Electric Power, Charleston, WV.
2005n Phase I Archaeological Survey and Phase II Evaluation of Two Sites at the Proposed Colonial Heights Baptist Church Property, Chesterfield County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to VHB, Inc., Williamsburg, VA.
2006a Phase I Archaeological Survey of Seven Proposed Recreation areas at the Lake Gaston Reservoir, Mecklenburg County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Dominion Virginia Power, Richmond, VA.
2006b Phase I Archaeological Survey and Phase II Evaluation along the Route 655 Bridge Replacement Project, Nelson County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Louis Berger Group, Richmond, VA.
2006c Phase IA Alternatives Analysis of a Proposed HRSD Sewer Line Project, James City County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to URS, Inc., Virginia Beach, VA.
2006d Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Biggie Hunt Wetland Mitigation Area, Mecklenburg County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, Richmond, VA.
2006e Phase I Architectural Survey and Phase II Architectural Evaluation of Five Resources at the Proposed Featherfin Development Tract, Prince Edward County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, Richmond, VA. TECHNICAL REPORTS (cont’d)
22
2006f Phase I Architectural Survey of the Proposed Beech Ridge Wind Farm, Greenbrier County, West Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to BHE Environmental, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.
2006g Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of a 70-acre Proposed Training Facility, Harpers Ferry, West Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to Gulf Engineers and Consultants, Inc., Baton Rogue, LA.
2006h Phase I Archaeological Survey of a 42-acre Development Parcel, Appomattox County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Report submitted to VHB, Inc., Richmond, VA.
23