The Political Economy of Turkey's Relations with the Asia-Pacific

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Political Economy of Turkey's Relations with the Asia-Pacific CHAPTER 11 The Political Economy of Turkey’s Relations with the Asia-Pacifc Altay Atlı INTRODUCTION Addressing a group of international investors and entrepreneurs on November 24, 2018, in Istanbul, Turkey’s minister of trade, Ruhsar Pekcan, a former businesswoman herself, said that one cannot inter- pret the global economy correctly without understanding the develop- ments in the Asia-Pacifc1 frst. “The Asia-Pacifc region has become the world’s new focal point with respect to global production and trade,” she said, “in the following decades the Asia-Pacifc region will bear strategic importance for the Turkish economy and Turkey’s exporters. 1 In this chapter, the term “Asia-Pacifc” refers to the 38 countries classifed by the World Bank under “East Asia and Pacifc” in its list of country and lending groups. These coun- tries belong to the subgroupings commonly called as North, East, and Southeast Asia as well as Oceania, and they include neither South Asia nor those countries in the Americas littoral to the Pacifc Ocean. For a full list of the countries included, see World Bank, n.d. A. Atlı (*) Department of International Relations, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey e-mail: [email protected] © The Author(s) 2020 271 E. Parlar Dal (ed.), Turkey’s Political Economy in the 21st Century, International Political Economy Series, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27632-4_11 [email protected] 272 A. ATLI As Turkey, we are implementing policies in accordance with this global megatrend” (BloombergHT 2018). The Turkish government, in collaboration with the representative institutions of the country’s business community, has indeed taken sub- stantial steps over the past few years with the purpose of improving eco- nomic ties with the Asia-Pacifc. Two of the four countries that were designated in 2018 by the Ministry of Trade as “priority markets” for Turkish exporters, China and India, are in the Asia-Pacifc.2 Other min- istries are following suit; for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Asia- Pacifc is of great importance “for the diversifcation of our export markets, attracting foreign direct investment to our country and secur- ing international support for our political positions” (MFA, n.d). China, being the second largest economy of the world, is very much at the center of Ankara’s attention, and several Turkish ministries have included specifc objectives with regard to the rising economic powerhouse of the Asian continent in their action plans and policy papers (Atlı 2018a), yet in the meantime, other parts of the Asia-Pacifc are not neglected either, as evidenced by the fact that in 2017, after years of diplomatic efforts, Turkey has commenced “sectoral dialogue partnership for stronger cooperation” with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (Anadolu Agency 2017). Turkey’s interest in improving economic relations with the countries of the Asia-Pacifc is real and profound, and it is in line not only with the conjunctural realities of the global economy today but also with Ankara’s efforts for greater foreign policy proactivism, which “did not detach Turkey from its historical and strategic ties but aimed to develop a more multi-faceted and global outlook via increasing Turkey’s outreach to the Middle East, Africa, Asia-Pacifc and Latin America” (Baba 2017, 574). Moreover, as the Turkish economy continues to sail through turbulent waters, with a chronic current account defcit,3 excessive dependence on external funding, and industrial productivity levels much lower than the potential,4 the country has to make a breakthrough toward long-term 2 The other two “priority markets” are Russia and Mexico (Aydınlık 2018). 3 As of November 2018, the 12-month current account defcit of Turkey was $33.9 bil- lion. In year 2001, Turkey had a current account surplus of $3.8 billion (TCMB 2018). 4 Turkey has one of the lowest labor productivity rates among OECD countries, with $28.3 of GDP per hour worked, compared to $56.8 in the United States, $54.3 in Germany, $38.3 in Japan, and $34.4 in Greece, as of 2017 (OECD, n.d.). [email protected] 11 THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF TURKEY’S RELATIONS … 273 sustained growth, a process during which constructive interaction with a rising Asia-Pacifc can be benefcial. However, Turkey’s economic relations with these countries, including the economic behemoth that is China, are at the moment far from producing the desired effect. As will be discussed in the following section in greater detail, merchandise trade with the Asia-Pacifc is one of the largest sources of Turkey’s def- cit, whereas foreign direct investment (FDI) from the economic power- houses of Asia into the Turkish economy is still much lower compared to investment from European countries. Turkey has expectations from the Asia-Pacifc, but the Asia-Pacifc is not yet a major contributor to Turkey’s economic development, although there is enough reason to be realistically optimistic for the future. This chapter will commence with an overview of the actual state of Turkey’s economic relations with the Asia-Pacifc, focusing on bilateral merchandise trade and fows of FDI. The argument brought forward is that while in the short term Turkey aims to increase its exports to the region and improve the value added obtain from imports, in the long term what matters for the Turkish economy is to establish a sustainable relationship with the Asia-Pacifc, not necessarily with equilibrium in bilateral trade fgures, but one where Turkey makes the best of its export potential while at the same time securing increased amounts of FDI from the Asia-Pacifc that will contribute to the economy not only through its effect on the balance of payments, but also, and more importantly, by facilitating the fows of technology, know-how, and infrastructure into the Turkish economy. As an early case to illustrate this argument, Japanese and Korean FDI into the Turkish economy in the 1980s and 1990s will be examined, after which Turkey’s position with regard to, and its expectations from, China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) will be discussed in detail as a current example. OVERVIEW OF TURKEY’S ECONOMIC RELATIONS WITH THE ASIA-PACIFIC In 2018, Turkey had the nineteenth largest economy in the world as measured by nominal gross domestic product (GDP). Turkey’s GDP of $713.5 billion placed it right after the oil-rich Saudi Arabia and just before Switzerland in the ranking (IMF 2018). The year has been a diffcult one for the country, with a currency crisis taking a toll on the [email protected] 274 A. ATLI economy, including high infation and deteriorating levels of investment and consumption. After having registered a 7.4% GDP growth in 2017, Turkey’s economy is expected to have grown by 3.3% in 2018 and to contract by 0.4% in 2019 (OECD 2018). This is not a rosy picture; how- ever, despite the slowing domestic demand an increase in exports can be expected to offset the adverse effects and pave the way toward recovery as early as 2020 as long as and to the extent business, household and investor confdence in monetary and fscal policies are restored (ibid.). Turkey’s merchandise exports have actually increased in 2018, rising to $168.0 billion in annual volume, compared with $157.0 billion in the previous year,5 a trend that is aimed to be further developed by the gov- ernment and the business community through initiatives such as the “e-Export Mobilization” launched by the Ministry of Trade and Turkish Union of Chambers and Commodity Exchanges (TOBB) in June 2018, and the establishment of Turkey Trade Centers around the globe, of which the current number of 5 is planned to be increased to 35 in the near future as stated in the action plan released by the President’s Offce (TCCB 2018). As mentioned above, two of the Turkish government’s designated “priority markets” for exports are in the Asia-Pacifc region. However, while this appears to be a rational objective given the current structure of the global economy, the question remains where exactly the Asia- Pacifc located today in Turkey’s current bilateral trade with the rest of the world (Fig. 11.1). The fgure above illustrates the geographical composition of Turkey’s merchandise trade with various regions of the world comparing the most recent data, year 2018, with year 2001. Besides the overall increase in trading volumes, the most signifcant feature observed here is that the European Union (EU) has been the main partner of Turkey, both as an export destination and source of imports. This is a fact that is not sur- prising given the geographical proximity, a strong Turkish diaspora in Europe with business links with their ancestral land, and, perhaps more importantly, a customs union in effect between Turkey and the EU since 1996, allowing free movement of goods between the two entities 5 All fgures related to Turkey’s total bilateral merchandise trade with other countries are either directly taken or calculated by the author using the data from the website of the Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK, n.d.) unless stated otherwise. [email protected] 11 THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF TURKEY’S RELATIONS … 275 Fig. 11.1 Turkey’s Bilateral Trade with the Regions of the World (Source TUIK) (i.e., tariff-free), although this free movement does not cover ­individuals.6 In 2018, Turkey’s exports to the 28 countries of the EU amounted to $54.0 billion, corresponding to exactly 50.0% of Turkey’s total exports to the world.7 The share of the non-EU countries of Europe was 7.0%.
Recommended publications
  • The Customs Union Between Turkey and the European Union and Its
    THE CUSTOMS UNION BETWEEN TURKEY AND THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE TURKISH ECONOMY A thesis presented by Ali Murat PALA to The Department of Economics In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In the field of Economics Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts August, 2011 1 THE CUSTOMS UNION BETWEEN TURKEY AND THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE TURKISH ECONOMY by Ali Murat PALA ABSTRACT OF THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Economics in the Graduate School of Northeastern University August, 2011 2 ABSTRACT Since the declaration of the Republic in 1923, Turkey has always looked to the West for its modernization and development processes. Following the Second World War, several organizations were created among countries in order to maintain joint power against conflicts, including organizations that had just economic reasons. Being a founding member of the United Nations, a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the Council of Europe and the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, it was only sensible for Turkey, an ally of the West to follow the modernization and development processes by proving a part of the European Economic Community formed by six Western European countries in 1957. Making its first application in 1959, Turkey ended up signing the Ankara Agreement also known as the Association Agreement in 1963 that foresaw how the customs union would be established in order to secure Turkey’s membership to the Community. As stated by Appleyard (2010), customs union is the second stage of economic integration.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Boosting the Model Partnership with the United States
    Turkey and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Boosting the Model Partnership with the United States Kemal Kiriş ci turkey project policy paper Number 2 • September 2013 policy paper Number 2, September 2013 About CUSE The Center on the United States and Europe (CUSE) at Brookings fosters high-level U.S.-European dia- logue on the changes in Europe and the global challenges that affect transatlantic relations. As an integral part of the Foreign Policy Program, the Center offers independent research and recommendations for U.S. and European officials and policymakers, and it convenes seminars and public forums on policy-relevant issues. CUSE’s research program focuses on the transformation of the European Union; strategies for en- gaging the countries and regions beyond the frontiers of the EU including the Balkans, Caucasus, Russia, Turkey and Ukraine; and broader European security issues such as the future of NATO and forging com- mon strategies on energy security. The Center also houses specific programs on France, Italy and Turkey. About the Turkey Project Given Turkey’s geopolitical, historical and cultural significance, and the high stakes posed by the foreign policy and domestic issues it faces, Brookings launched the Turkey Project in 2004 to foster informed public consideration, high‐level private debate, and policy recommendations focusing on developments in Turkey. In this context, Brookings has collaborated with the Turkish Industry and Business Association (TÜSİAD) to institute a U.S.-Turkey Forum at Brookings. The Forum organizes events in the form of conferences, sem- inars and workshops to discuss topics of relevance to U.S.-Turkish and transatlantic relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey-Azerbaijan Energy Relations: a Political and Economic Analysis
    International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy Vol. 5, No. 1, 2015, pp.27-44 ISSN: 2146-4553 www.econjournals.com Turkey-Azerbaijan Energy Relations: A Political and Economic Analysis Cagla Gul YESEVI Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Istanbul Kültür University, Istanbul, Turkey. Email: [email protected] Burcu Yavuz TIFTIKCIGIL Faculty of Economics, Administrative and Social Sciences, Gedik University, Istanbul, Turkey. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: It is now widely recognized that Turkey-Azerbaijan relations have always been strong and described with the phrase "one nation with two states”. This paper is concerned with economic and political nature of Turkey-Azerbaijan relations. Initially, the evolution of Turkish- Azerbaijani relations after the independence of Azerbaijan has been examined. This paper gives an overview of the impacts of Nagorno-Karabagh issue and efforts to normalize the relations between Turkey and Armenia on relations between Turkey and Azerbaijan. Energy has a special place in the relationship between the two countries. Azerbaijan’s economy, energy sectors of Azerbaijan and Turkey has been assessed. Moreover, this paper gives a comparative analysis on economic relationship between Turkey and Azerbaijan. This study finally discusses the main trends and contributions of energy projects on Turkey-Azerbaijan relations. Keywords: Turkey; Azerbaijan; Politics; Economy; Energy JEL Classifications: O57; Q41; Q43; Q48 1. Introduction Turkey has distanced itself from the Turkic people of Soviet Union, with whom it has ethnic and language affiliations, since its establishment. The primary aim was determined as the prevention of the spread of communism within the country and Turanist movements were not supported.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Observations on the Convergence Experience of Turkey
    WORKING PAPER NO: 13/29 Some Observations on the Convergence Experience of Turkey July 2013 Murat ÜNGÖR © Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey 2013 Address: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Head Office Research and Monetary Policy Department İstiklal Caddesi No: 10 Ulus, 06100 Ankara, Turkey Phone: +90 312 507 54 02 Facsimile: +90 312 507 57 33 The views expressed in this working paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey. The Working Paper Series are externally refereed. The refereeing process is managed by the Research and Monetary Policy Department. Some Observations on the Convergence Experience of Turkey Murat Üngör 1 Research and Monetary Policy Department Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey July 2013 Abstract This study, without providing a complete picture of the country’s economic development, aims to bring about a better understanding of the convergence experience of Turkey. We explore some aspects of the convergence process of Turkey and provide some international comparisons tracking the changes in both nominal and real per capita income figures. With respect to the per capita income, Turkey is closer to Brazil than to Korea. From the 1960s until now, Korea is closing the gap in per capita income that separates the country from the richest countries of the world. On the other hand, Brazil and Turkey lost ground in the last two-three decades of the 20 th century. After the lost decades, Turkey had high growth rates during 2002-2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle East 1950–1951
    SUMMARY OF RECENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS IN THE MIDDLE EAST Supplement to WORLD ECONOMIC REPORT, 1950-51 UNITED NATIONS SUMMARY OF RECENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS IN THE MIDDLE EAST Supplement to WORLD ECONOMIC REPORT, 1950-51 UNITED NATIONS Department of E~onomic Aft'airs New York, April 1952 E/2193/Add.3 ('ST/ECA/14/Add .. 3 ) April 1952 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATIONS SALES NUMBER: 1952. II. C.3 PRICE $1.00 i PREFATORY :NOTE The present "Summary of Recent Economic Developments in the Mid.dle East" forms a supplem.ent to the survey of the world economic situation prepared. by the &~cretariat of the United Nations and. issued in ~ Economic Report. 195.0-51.. This B'l.l:lImI8.ry was prepared 'by the Division of Economic stability and. Development in the Department of Economic Affairs. In general, information for the figures in the tex.t and the tables w.s obtained from data compiled by the statistical Office of the United Nations. In ad.d.ition to government sources, other official international and national sources were utilized. When such data were not available, private sources were consulted. Because of variations in m.ethods of compiling data, information for the various countries is not always strictly comparable. Explanation of §rm'bola The following symbols have been used throughout the text and tables: Two dots ( •• ) indicate that data are not available A dash (-) indicates that the amount is nil or negligible A blank in a table indicates that the item is not applicable A minus sign (-) indicates a deficit or decrease A full stop (.) is used to indicate decimals A comma (,) is used to distinguish thousands and millions A slash (/) ind.icates a crop year or fiscal year, e.g., 1950/51 Use of a hyphen (-) between dates representing years, e.g., 1934-38, normally signifies an annual average for the calendar years involved, including the beginning and end.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of Turkey
    RESTRICTED GENERAL AGREEMENT C/RM/G/42 20 December 1993 ON TARIFFS AND TRADE Limited Distribution (93-2123) TRADE POLICY REVIEW MECHANISM THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY Report by the Government In pursuance of the CONTRACTING PARTIES' Decision of 12 April 1989 concerning the Trade Policies Review Mechanism (BISD 36/403), the initial full report by the Republic of Turkey for the review by the Council is attached. NOTE TO ALL DELEGATIONS Until futher notice, this document is subject to a press embargo. The Republic of Turkey C/RM/G/42 Page i CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 1. ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT 4 1. Wider Economic and Development Policies and Objectives 4 A Basic Objectives of Turkish Development Plans 4 B Economic Policies and the Structural Adjustment Programme in the 1980s. 4 2. External Economic Developments 6 A Major Trends in Balance of Payments 6 B Developments in Terms of Trade 7 C External Debt 7 D Recent Developments in Turkish Exchange Regime 8 Il. TRADE POLICIES AND PRACTICES 10 1. General Framework and Trade Policy Formulation 10 2. Trade policies 11 (a) Import policy 11 (b) Export policy 12 3. Other Issues Related to Foreign Trade 13 III. RELATIONS WITH EC, EFTA AND OTHER MAJOR TRADING PARTNERS 16 1. Turkey - EC Association 16 A The Association 16 (a) The Ankara Agreement 16 (b) The Additional Protocol 16 (c) Turkey's Application for Full Membership 17 (d) The Present Situation in Turkey - EC Association 17 C/RM/G/42 Trade Policy Review Mechanism Page ii Page B Implementation 18 (a) Fulfilment of Obligations Originating from the Additional Protocol 18 (b) Coordination of Economic and Financial Policies 20 (c) Turkey's Commercial Relations with the EC 21 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Political Economy of Turkey's Integration Into the MENA Economy
    The Political Economy of Turkey’s Integration into the MENA Economy Imad El-Anis1 Introduction In the early post-Cold War era, space opened-up for renewed Turkish interest in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), and Central Asia – regions in which the Ottoman Empire, as the predecessor to the modern Turkish Republic, had played a pivotal role. Through the 1990s and early 2000s Turkey’s political, economic and socio-cultural links with the MENA, in particular, rapidly expanded. Whereas through the 1900s Ankara had looked westwards to Europe and did not pay significant attention to its neighbours to the south and east (outside of security interests), Turkey has 'rediscovered’ the MENA and now plays a very significant role in the region’s political and economic affairs. A body of literature has emerged that explores the emergence of these expanding ties and the policy interests driving them (see, for example: Öniş 2010; Kardaş 2010; Kirisci and Kaptanoglu 2011; Hürsoy 2013;). It is timely to deepen our understanding of the ways in which Turkey has not only reengaged with the MENA but has more fully integrated with it. Turkey now plays an important role in the region’s political and economic system in a number of ways. This chapter explores this new reality by analysing the political economy of Turkey’s relations with MENA partners. According to Ziya Öniş and Mustafa Kutlay (2013, 1412) ‘[t]he current proactivism in Turkish foreign policy […] increasingly relies on two pillars: economic interdependence, and explicit pro- democracy rhetoric.’ It is the first of these two pillars that is the focus of this chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • “A Correct and Progressive Road”: Us-Turkish Relations, 1945-1964
    “A CORRECT AND PROGRESSIVE ROAD”: U.S.-TURKISH RELATIONS, 1945-1964 Michael M. Carver A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2011 Committee: Dr. Douglas J. Forsyth, Advisor Dr. Gary R. Hess Dr. Marc V. Simon, Graduate Faculty Representative Dr. Tiffany Trimmer 1 2011 Michael M. Carver All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT 2 Dr. Douglas Forsyth, Advisor This historical investigation of U.S.-Turkish relations from the end of World War II to 1964 provides a greater understanding of the challenges inherent in the formation and implementation of U.S. policy in Turkey at a time when the Turks embarked on multiparty politics and a determined campaign to become a modern and distinctly European nation through ambitious economic development programs. Washington proved instrumental in this endeavor, providing financial support through the Marshall Plan and subsequent aid programs, and political sponsorship of Turkey’s membership in international organizations such as NATO and the EEC. U.S. policymakers encountered various quandaries as they forged bilateral relations with the Turks, specifically reconciling democratization with Turkey’s development and participation in the containment of communism. The Turkish government under Adnan Menderes demonstrated its reliability as a U.S. ally, providing troops to fight in the Korean War and cooperating in the construction of NATO bases and the modernization of its military, but it came under increasing pressure from the political opposition when its economic policies failed to secure long-term economic growth and stability. Starting in the mid-1950s the Menderes government adopted increasingly authoritarian measures to control dissent, a problematic situation for Washington, as it desired greater Turkish democracy while at them same time did not wish to compromise the growing American military presence in Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • A Causative-Diagnostic Analysis of Turkey's Majcr Prcblems And
    A CAUSATIVE-DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS OF TURKEY'S MAJCR PRCBLEMS AND A CQUwUNICATIVE APPROACH TO THEIR SOLUTION (DEMOCRATIC PLANNING AND MASS COMMUNICATION) Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By ILHAN OZDIL, B.S. The Ohio State University 195U Approved by* VI Adviser Table of Contents Page Introduction • . • T± Propositions ...... .............................. Tl The Sti*ucture of the Study ...................... •▼'111 The irfethod uf the Study........................ • . lx The Vindication of the Topical Selection........... Xl P&A Diagnosis Chapter 1 A Brief Retrospect ........... 1 Chapter II About the Nature of the Kemalist Revolution .... 9 1. The Nature of Kemalisra........... 9 2. The idain Principles, Objectives and Reforms of the Kemalist Revolution 13 3. Turkish Revolution as a Far-reaching Democratic Educa­ tional Process ........... 16 Chapter III A Causative-Diagnostic Analysis of Sane Uajor Problems of Turkey.................................25 1. Agriculture ...................................... 35 A. Definition and description of the problem...... 35 B. Causative-diagnostic analysis of the problem . 1+1 C. Remedial proposals and their communicative bearings ............... 1+8 D. Present Situation......... 5U 2 • Industry 56 A* Definition and description of the problem ..... 56 B. Causative-diagnostic analysis of the problem . 63 C. Remedial proposals and their communicative bearings .......................................73 D. Present Situation ......... 76 3* Public Health and Social Welfare............. 79 A. Definition and description of the problem...... 79 B. Causative-diagnostic analysis of the problem . 82 C. Remedial proposals and their communicative bearings ..... ..................... .... 87 D. Present situation .... ..... 91 li. Politics and Democratization . ............. 98 A. Definition and description of the problem...... 98 B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relations Between the Republic of Turkey and the United States of America at the Present Stage
    Journal of International Relations and Foreign Policy June 2018, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 1-6 ISSN: 2333-5866 (Print), 2333-5874 (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development DOI: 10.15640/jirfp.v6n1a1 URL: https://doi.org/10.15640/jirfp.v6n1a1 The Relations between the Republic of Turkey and the United States of America at the Present Stage E. Makaradze1 & B. Makaradze2 Abstract At the end of XX century and in the first decade of XXI century the relations between Turkey and the United States of America attracted the attention of the international community. Since the end of the Cold War, the relationship between the Republic of Turkey and the United States has been mainly focused on security. The foreign policy of the two countries, from time to time was conducted in completely different directions. Parallel to this, the periods of ups and downs had an impact on economic relations as well. It was the security policy that carried out mutual cooperation between the two countries. On the one hand, it was the USA – one of the leaders of the Cold War, and, on the other hand, Turkey - very important in the region, but the most dependent on the US. Despite being in the NATO bloc together with the USA, Turkey has never felt secure itself. Assessing Ankara's domestic and foreign policy, it is necessary to take into account the relationship with the United States, as it has had the biggest impact on Turkey’s policy. Although the real and potential power of these two countries was not equal, during the Cold War Turkey became a stronghold of NATO and the West bloc against the Soviet Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Sweden and Turkey: Two Models of Welfare State in Europe
    SWEDEN AND TURKEY: TWO MODELS OF WELFARE STATE IN EUROPE Simona Moagǎr Poladian1 Andreea-Emanuela Drǎgoi2 Abstract Our paper analyzes two models of economic development: Sweden and Turkey. The main objective of this analysis is to highlight in which way two countries with different development strategies, economic geography, mentality and culture have managed to maintain growth before and during the global economic crisis, becoming gradually genuine models of welfare state. The analysis undertaken in this paper is, consequently, divided into two parts. The first shows the Swedish model of welfare state, that was an inspirational one in the ’70 and ’80, and its specific strengths and vulnerabilities. The second part summarizes Turkey's economic development over the past decade, emphasizing comparative advantages that have made it the 16th largest economy of the world and its strategy in terms of managing the international economic crisis. The final part of our comparative approach aims to respond to the following question: may those two economic models be considered proper economic lessons for the other states that are confronted with economic vulnerabilities? Keywords: welfare state, model of economic development, comparative advantage, international economic crisis. JEL Classification: D7, D78, E, H, E01. Introduction – the concept of welfare state As stated in the literature in the field (Pierson, Castle, 2010), the current challenges of the new contemporary economies (globalization, European integration, demographic and political changes) have made necessary the reconsidering of the welfare state paradigm. Some analysts (Daly and Lewis, 2000) argue that the concept of welfare state involves three fundamental dimensions: a strong economic growth, a powerful social security system and a better life quality for the citizens of the state in cause.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of Turkey's 2018-2019 Economic Crisis
    Institute for International Political Economy Berlin The Making of Turkey’s 2018-2019 Economic Crisis Authors: Ümit Akcay and Ali Riza Güngen Working Paper, No. 120/2019 Editors: Sigrid Betzelt, Eckhard Hein (lead editor), Martina Metzger, Jennifer Pédussel Wu, Martina Sproll, Christina Teipen, Achim Truger, Markus Wissen, Reingard Zimmer The Making of Turkey’s 2018-2019 Economic Crisis Ümit Akcay* and Ali Riza Güngen** Abstract: Turkish economic growth depends on capital inflows and access to cheap credit sources. Once the global financial conditions tightened in 2018, Turkey was among the emerging markets that suffered the most. This article analyses the making of Turkey’s economic crisis in 2018-2019, while elaborating the phases of Turkish financialisation. It locates the slow-motion drift of Turkish economy within the context of dependent financialisation and argues that a long-term account is needed to grasp the economic turmoil of recent years. JEL code: E44, E52, E6, F31, G01, Keywords: Turkey, Dependent Financialisation, Economic Crises, Crisis Management * Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE), Corresponding Author: [email protected] ** Turkish Social Sciences Association, CHR/Carnegie Mellon University Distant Fellow, [email protected] 1 Introduction The global financial tightening in 2018 hurt emerging markets and Turkey was among the most notable victims, as it suffered from a currency crisis followed by a recession. The Turkish Lira (TL) lost 31 per cent of its value against the US Dollar (USD) in 2018, depreciating much further in the first eight months and then appreciating after the sharp interest rate hike that September.
    [Show full text]