National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health Care

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health Care U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, OPHS Of fice of Minority Health National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health Care FINAL REPORT March 2001 Washington, D.C. National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health Care FINAL REPORT U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Minority Health March 2001 Prepared by: Prepared for: IQ Solutions, Inc. Office of Minority Health 11300 Rockville Pike U.S. Department of Health Suite 801 and Human Services Rockville, MD 20852 Under Contract No. 282-99-0039 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . .v PROJECT OVERVIEW . .1 NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR CULTURALLY AND LINGUISTICALLY APPROPRIATE SERVICES IN HEALTH CARE . .3 NARRATIVE OUTLINE . .21 PART I: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE . .23 INTRODUCTION . .25 Recommendations . .36 PART II: INDIVIDUAL STANDARDS WITH DISCUSSION . .45 INTRODUCTION . .47 Standard 1 . .49 Standard 2 . .54 Standard 3 . .59 Standard 4 . .65 Standard 5 . .70 Standard 6 . .72 Standard 7 . .77 Standard 8 . .83 Standard 9 . .88 Standard 10 . .92 Standard 11 . .98 Standard 12 . .102 Standard 13 . .106 Standard 14 . .109 PART III: METHODOLOGY AND ANALYSIS . .113 INTRODUCTION . .115 Development of the Draft CLAS Standards: Stage One . .115 Public Comment on and Revision of the CLAS Standards: Stage Two . 116 National Project Advisory Committee . .117 PART IV: BIBLIOGRAPHY AND GLOSSARY . .121 BIBLIOGRAPHY . .123 GLOSSARY . .131 APPENDIX A National Advisory Council Member List . .A-3 Public Comment Regional Meetings Participants Lists San Francisco . .A-7 Baltimore . .A-17 Chicago . .A-33 Appendix B Source of Written Comments . .B-3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report is the result of a multiyear process that involved countless numbers of special individuals across the United States and beyond. We extend our appreciation to them: • The National Project Advisory Committee (NPAC), for their dedication and tireless efforts in deliberating on countless drafts of the CLAS standards and their provision of comments, opinions, and expertise during the many months of revisions. A complete list of NPAC members appears in Appendix A. • The individuals and organizations whose written comments helped to shape the final CLAS standards, and the hundreds of participants who attended the three regional meetings held as part of the public comment process. Information and feedback garnered at these sessions guided the development of the final version of the standards. Rosters of all who wrote comments and attended the regional meetings appear in Appendix A. • Dr. Nathan Stinson, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Minority Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, for his ongoing support and commitment to the project. • Ms. Valerie Welsh, Evaluation Officer, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Minority Health (OMH), who was instrumental in acquiring funding for the launching of the project. • Mr. Guadalupe Pacheco of the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Minority Health (OMH) for his vision of conceiving the project and his substantive intellectual and personal contributions in his role as Project Officer. • The core project staff for their indefatigable labor and efforts throughout the duration of this project: - C. Godfrey Jacobs of IQ Solutions, who served as Project Director. - Julia Puebla Fortier of Resources for Cross Cultural Health Care, who was Principal Investigator. - Gale Harris of IQ Solutions, who contributed as a Senior Writer. - Monica Barnhart of IQ Solutions, who served as a Senior Research Associate. - Michael Huddleston and Eileen Alexander of IQ Solutions, who served as Graphic Designers. Office of Minority Health v PROJECT OVERVIEW As the U.S. population becomes more diverse, medical providers and other people involved in health care delivery are interacting with patients/consumers from many different cultural and linguistic backgrounds. Because culture and language are vital factors in how health care services are delivered and received, it is important that health care organizations and their staff understand and respond with sensitivity to the needs and preferences that culturally and linguistically diverse patients/consumers bring to the health encounter. Providing culturally and linguistically appropriate services (CLAS) to these patients has the potential to improve access to care, quality of care, and, ultimately, health outcomes. Unfortunately, a lack of comprehensive standards has left organizations and providers with no clear guidance on how to provide CLAS in health care settings. In 1997, the Office of Minority Health (OMH) undertook the development of national standards to provide a much-needed alternative to the current patchwork of independently developed definitions, practices, and requirements concerning CLAS. The Office initiated a project to develop recommended national CLAS standards that would support a more consistent and comprehensive approach to cultural and linguistic competence in health care. The first stage of the project involved a review and analysis of existing cultural and linguistic competence standards and measures, the development of draft standards, and revisions based on a review by a national advisory committee. The second stage focused on obtaining and incorporating input from organizations, agencies, and individuals that have a vital stake in the establishment of CLAS standards. Publication of standards in the Federal Register on December 15, 1999, announced a 4-month public comment period, which provided three regional meetings and a Web site as well as traditional avenues (mail and fax) for submitting feedback on the CLAS standards. A project team (consisting of staff members of OMH, its contractor, and subcontractor) analyzed public comments from 413 individuals or organizations and proposed revised standards, with accompanying commentaries, to a National Project Advisory Committee (NPAC). Deliberations and additional review by NPAC members informed further refinements of the standards. In their final version, the CLAS standards reflect input from a broad range of stakeholders, including hospitals, community-based clinics, managed care organizations, home health agencies, and other types of health care organizations; physicians, nurses, and other providers; professional associations; State and Federal agencies and other policymakers; purchasers of health care; accreditation and credentialing agencies; educators; and patient advocates, advocacy groups, and consumers. The CLAS standards were published in final form in the Federal Register on December 22, 2000, as recommended national standards for adoption or adaptation by stakeholder organizations and agencies. A preamble and the fourteen CLAS standards follow. Office of Minority Health 1 STANDARDS National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health Care Preamble The following national standards issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Office of Minority Health (OMH) respond to the need to ensure that all people entering the health care system receive equitable and effective treatment in a culturally and linguistically appropriate manner. These standards for culturally and linguistically appropriate services (CLAS) are proposed as a means to correct inequities that currently exist in the provision of health services and to make these services more responsive to the individual needs of all patients/consumers. The standards are intended to be inclusive of all cultures and not limited to any particular population group or sets of groups; however, they are especially designed to address the needs of racial, ethnic, and linguistic population groups that experience unequal access to health services. Ultimately, the aim of the standards is to contribute to the elimination of racial and ethnic health disparities and to improve the health of all Americans. The CLAS standards are primarily directed at health care organizations; however, individual providers are also encouraged to use the standards to make their practices more culturally and linguistically accessible. The principles and activities of culturally and linguistically appropriate services should be integrated throughout an organization and undertaken in partnership with the communities being served. The 14 standards are organized by themes: Culturally Competent Care (Standards 1-3), Language Access Services (Standards 4-7), and Organizational Supports for Cultural Competence (Standards 8-14). Within this framework, there are three types of standards of varying stringency: mandates, guidelines, and recommendations as follows: CLAS mandates are current Federal requirements for all recipients of Federal funds (Standards 4, 5, 6, and 7). CLAS guidelinesare activities recommended by OMH for adoption as mandates by Federal, State, and national accrediting agencies (Standards 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13). CLAS recommendationsare suggested by OMH for voluntary adoption by health care organizations (Standard 14). The standards are also intended for use by: • Policymakers, to draft consistent and comprehensive laws, regulations, and contract language. This audience would include Federal, State and local legislators, administrative and oversight staff, and program managers. • Accreditation and credentialing agencies, to assess and compare providers who say they offer culturally competent services and to assure quality for diverse populations. This audience would
Recommended publications
  • A Thesis Entitled Quality of Life of People Who Stutter by Emily
    A Thesis entitled Quality of Life of People who Stutter by Emily Figliomeni Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in Speech Language Pathology _________________________________________ Dr. Rodney Gabel, Ph.D., CCC-SLP, BCS-F, Committee Chair _________________________________________ Dr. Stephanie Hughes, Ph.D., CCC-SLP, Committee Member _________________________________________ Mrs. Jennifer Glassman, M.A. CCC-SLP, Committee Member _________________________________________ Dr. Patricia R. Komuniecki, Ph.D., Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo May 2015 Copyright 2015, Emily Figliomeni This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. An Abstract of Quality of Life of People who Stutter by Emily Figliomeni Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in Speech Language Pathology The University of Toledo May 2015 Stuttering is a communication disorder that can impact a person’s life. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively explore the impact of stuttering on quality of life (QOL), and the differences between the beliefs of people who stutter (PWS) and the speech-language pathologist (SLP) regarding this issue. Individual experiences were obtained through the process of open-ended interviews with six PWS, and six SLPs who work with PWS. Major recurring themes included: 1) restriction, 2) identity, 3) positivity, 4) control, and 5) therapy impact. Similar beliefs were shared among individuals in both groups of participants, and were reflected in additional minor themes including therapy impact on QOL, physical impact, empowerment, acceptance, authenticity, and restriction regarding occupation and personal relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Sound Ethics in Health Care in Depth: Speak Up! Listen Up! May 14, 2018
    Sound Ethics in Health Care In Depth: Speak Up! Listen Up! May 14, 2018 Dr. John Billig: Hello, and thank you for joining today's IntegratedEthics Improvement Forum Call. I'm John Billig, Chief of IntegratedEthics. As you probably know, today marks the beginning of National Compliance and Ethics Week in VA. This year's theme is Speak up! Listen up! And today's call will celebrate that theme. It promises to be an interesting and enlightening discussion. And now to kick things off, it's my great pleasure today to introduce our first speaker, Dr. Gerard Cox. Dr. Cox is Acting Deputy Under Secretary for Health for Organizational Excellence while continuing to serve as Assistant Deputy Under Secretary for Health for Integrity. Prior to his current role, he served as Assistant Deputy Under Secretary for Health for Policy and Services, Interim Medical Inspector, and Assistant Deputy Under Secretary for Health for Integrity. Before joining VA in 2014, Dr. Cox spent more than 30 years in military medicine. As a U.S. Navy medical officer, he served in a series of hospital leadership roles with increasingly complex management responsibilities, including service chief, service line leader, chief operating officer, and chief executive officer. He also held executive positions with the Navy Surgeon General, the commandant of the Marine Corps, the commander of U.S. Navy forces in the Middle East, and the Naval Inspector General. In addition, Dr. Cox served as a White House physician for Presidents William J. Clinton and George W. Bush. Dr. Cox, thank you for joining us today.
    [Show full text]
  • Preventing Falls in Hospitals: a Toolkit for Improving Quality of Care
    Preventing Falls in Hospitals A Toolkit for Improving Quality of Care The information in this toolkit is intended to assist service providers and hospitals in developing falls prevention protocols. This toolkit is intended as a reference and not as a substitute for professional judgment. The opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of AHRQ. No statement in this toolkit should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. In addition, AHRQ or U.S. Department of Health and Human Services endorsement of any derivative product may not be stated or implied. Preventing Falls in Hospitals A Toolkit for Improving Quality of Care Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 www.ahrq.gov Prepared by: RAND Corporation Boston University School of Public Health ECRI Institute Contract No. HHSA290201000017I TO #1 AHRQ Publication No. 13-0015-EF January 2013 Authors RAND Corporation David A. Ganz, M.D., Ph.D., VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, University of California at Los Angeles, and RAND Corporation Christina Huang, M.P.H., RAND Corporation Debra Saliba, M.D., M.P.H., VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, UCLA/JH Borun Center for Gerontological Research, and RAND Corporation Victoria Shier, M.P.A., RAND Corporation Boston University School of Public Health Dan Berlowitz, M.D., M.P.H., Bedford VA Hospital and Boston University School of Public Health Carol VanDeusen Lukas, Ed.D., VA Boston Healthcare System and Boston University School of Public Health ECRI Institute Kathryn Pelczarski, B.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Health and Human Services
    Vol. 78 Wednesday, No. 39 February 27, 2013 Part II Department of Health and Human Services 45 CFR Parts 144, 147, 150, et al. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Health Insurance Market Rules; Rate Review; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:19 Feb 26, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM 27FER2 erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES_2 13406 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 39 / Wednesday, February 27, 2013 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND A. Part 144—Requirements Relating to Federal Register proposed rule entitled HUMAN SERVICES Health Insurance Coverage ‘‘Patient Protection and Affordable Care 1. Subpart A—General Provisions Act; Health Insurance Market Rules; 45 CFR Parts 144, 147, 150, 154 and B. Part 147—Health Insurance Reform Rate Review’’ (77 FR 70584). These 156 Requirements for the Group and Individual Health Insurance Markets standards apply to health insurance [CMS–9972–F] 1. Fair Health Insurance Premiums issuers offering non-grandfathered 2. State Reporting health insurance coverage both inside RIN 0938–AR40 3. Guaranteed Availability of Coverage and outside of the new competitive 4. Guaranteed Renewability of Coverage marketplaces called Affordable Patient Protection and Affordable Care C. Part 150—CMS Enforcement in Group Insurance Exchanges, or ‘‘Exchanges.’’ Act; Health Insurance Market Rules; and Individual Insurance Markets This final rule: (1) Provides that Rate Review D. Part 154—Health Insurance Issuer Rate health insurance issuers may vary the Increases: Disclosure and Review AGENCY: Department of Health and premium rate for health insurance Requirements coverage in the individual and small Human Services.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist to Prepare Physician Offices for COVID-19
    Checklist to Prepare Physician Offices for COVID-19 ASSUMPTION: Transmission will be primarily through exposure to respiratory droplets and direct contact with patients and their contaminated environments. Universal Early Preparation within six feet of patients with suspected COVID-19 infection. (See approved respirators). Provide training ☐ Educate staff and patients about changes they for staff on respirators to ensure fit and appropriate can expect to be implemented in the office use. during an outbreak or pandemic, and about ways to prepare themselves and their families. • Ensure adherence to standard precautions, including airborne precautions and use of eye protection. Assume that every patient is potentially infected or COVID-19 Education colonized with a pathogen that could be transmitted in • Educate staff about coronavirus disease 2019 a health care setting. (COVID-19), and why it is important to contain the • Implement mechanisms and policies that promptly outbreak. alert key facility staff including infection control, health • Educate staff on facility policies and practices care epidemiology, facility leadership, occupational to minimize chance of exposure to respiratory health, clinical laboratory, and frontline staff about pathogens including SARS-CoV-2, the virus that known suspected COVID-19 patients (i.e. PUI). Keep causes COVID-19. updated lists of staff and patients to identify those at risk in the event of an exposure. • Train and educate staff with job-or task-specific information on preventing transmission of infectious • Staff should follow the CDC guidelines collecting, agents, including refresher training. handling and testing clinical specimens from (PUIs for COVID-19. • Educate staff about COVID-19 evaluation and treatment. • Prepare for office staff illness, absences, and/or quarantine.
    [Show full text]
  • Code of Conduct: Our Principles of Ethics & Integrity
    CODE OF CONDUCT Our Principles of Ethics & Integrity UnitedHealth Group Code of Conduct: Our Principles of Ethics & Integrity 4 Violations of the Code of Conduct and Policies 4 Waiver and Changes to the Code 4 Who to Contact with Questions or Concerns 5 Integrity 6 Act with Integrity 7 Integrity of Books and Records 7 Integrity Challenges 8 Associated Policies 9 Accountability 10 Be Accountable 11 Accountability Challenges 12 Associated Policies 13 Fair Competition and Fair Dealing 14 Comply with Fair Competition Laws and Company Policies 15 Challenges to Competing Fairly 16 Associated Policies 17 Privacy and Information Security 18 Protect Personal Information 19 Protect Privacy, Ensure Security 19 Privacy and Information Security Challenges 20 Associated Policies 21 Our Assets and the Environment 22 Be a Steward of our Assets and the Environment 23 Stewardship Challenges 24 Associated Policies 25 Government Interactions 26 Ensure Appropriate Interactions with Government Officials 28 Government Interaction Challenges 30 Associated Policies 31 Communications and Marketing 32 Communicate Effectively and Appropriately 33 Communication Challenges 34 Associated Policies 35 A Safe and Supportive Working Environment 36 Promote a Safe and Supportive Working Environment 37 Work Environment Challenges 38 Associated Policies 39 Code of Conduct UNITEDHEALTH GROUP AND INTEGRITY The people of UnitedHealth Group and its our work day-to-day is important to fulfilling subsidiaries around the world (“UnitedHealth our mission to help people live healthier lives Group” or “the Company”) share five and to help make the health system work better values that best describe how we aspire to for everyone. Health care is among the most conduct ourselves and our business: integrity, personal, intimate aspects of a person’s life, compassion, relationships, innovation, and and each individual must be able to trust our performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Advice to Those Who Stutter Who Those to Advice SECOND EDITION
    advice to those who stutter SECOND EDITION advice to those who stutter THE STUTTERING FOUNDATION® A Nonprofit Organization Since 1947—Helping Those Who Stutter 3100 Walnut Grove Road, Suite 603 P.O. Box 11749 • Memphis, TN 38111-0749 800-992-9392 901-452-7343 www.stutteringhelp.org Second Edition www.tartamudez.org SFA Publication SFA No. 0009 ISBN 0-933388-39-X Expert help from THE 28 therapists who STUTTERING stutter themselves FOUNDATION® ISBN 0-933388-39-X PUBLICATION NO. 0009 9 7 8 0 9 3 3 3 8 8 3 9 0 Myths about stuttering Winston Churchill John Stossel Marilyn Monroe James Earl Jones Myth: People who stutter are not smart. Did you know... Reality: There is no link whatsoever between stuttering and intelligence. Ⅲ Over three million Americans stutter. Stuttering affects three to four times as many males as females. Myth: Nervousness causes stuttering. Ⅲ Ⅲ Approximately 5% of all children go through a period of stuttering that lasts six months or Reality: Nervousness does not cause stuttering. Nor should we assume that more. Three-quarters of those will recover by late childhood, leaving about 1% with a long- people who stutter are prone to be nervous, fearful, anxious, or shy. term problem. They have the same full range of personality traits as those who do not stutter. Ⅲ Exciting new research in the areas of genetics, neurophysiology, child development, and family dynamics is shedding light on the possible causes of stuttering. As a result, we have made Myth: Stuttering can be “caught” through imitation or by hearing another tremendous progress in the prevention of stuttering in young children.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Health Care Heroes Lifetime Achievement Award Winner Michael Grossman, Maricopa Integrated Health System
    AUGUST 26, 2016 2 0 1 6 Honoring 26 dynamic health care professionals who are making patient’s lives better through their support and dedication PREMIER SPONSOR 28 PHOENIX BUSINESS JOURNAL AUGUST 26, 2016 29 HEALTH CARE HEROES he Phoenix Business Journal’s 15th annual Health Care Heroes awards honors those Arizona physicians, nurses, emergency responders and T volunteers who try to keep us all just a little bit healthier. A panel of judges, which included past award winners, selected this year’s honorees, who serve the community from the front office and behind the scenes in eight categories. A Lifetime Achievement award winner also was chosen. All of this year’s honorees were recognized at a special awards event held Aug. 25. 2016 Health Care Heroes Lifetime Achievement Award Winner Michael Grossman, Maricopa Integrated Health System ...............................................30 Lifetime Achievement Finalists Lesley Hunt, Orchard Medical Consuting ....................................................................................32 David Jacofsky, The CORE Institute ................................................................................................32 Innovator Award Winner Dr. Angela DeRosa, DeRosa Medical ........................................................................................... 33 Innovator Finalists Alexander Green, ASU Biodesign Institute ................................................................................ 34 Marc Lato, Dignity Health-St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center........................35
    [Show full text]
  • Apr 16 Dinner Ltr021805
    ThyCa: Thyroid Cancer Survivorsʼ Association, Inc.SM An all-volunteer non-profit 501 (c)(3) organization of thyroid cancer survivors, family members, and health professionals, dedicated to support, communication, and education for thyroid cancer survivors, their families, and friends P.O. Box 1545, New York, NY 10159-1545 www.thyca.org Toll Free 1-877-588-7904 [email protected] Raise the Stakes for Thyroid Cancer Research! Join us for our Dinner/Play-Money "Casino Night," April 16, 2005, in Baltimore! Dear Friends, We thank you for your dedication to the well-being of thyroid cancer patients, and invite you to join us at our Dinner and "Casino Night" Fundraiser, with “play money” games (for fun, not for cash). This benefit evening is sponsored by ThyCa: Thyroid Cancer Survivorsʼ Association in cooperation with Light of Life Foundation and the American Thyroid Association. It's all for a good cause – thyroid cancer research. This special event starts at 7 p.m. on Saturday, April 16, 2005, at the Baltimore Waterfront Marriott Hotel, 700 Aliceanna Street, Baltimore, Maryland. Attire is casual. The hotel is also hosting ATA's Frontiers in Thyroid Cancer Meeting. The Dinner/Casino Night follows ThyCa's free one-day educational workshop on April 16 — ThyCaʼs 4th Annual Thyroid Cancer Survivorsʼ Mid-Atlantic Workshop. Tickets for the Dinner/Casino Night Fundraiser are payable by credit card or check to ThyCa. Your generosity beyond the dinner ticket cost is tax-deductible. Donations plus net proceeds from the benefit support thyroid cancer research. You are invited to attend, sponsor a ticket or a dinner table for others, sponsor a games table, or help us with a donation.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity
    REPORT OF THE COMMISSION ON ENDING CHILDHOOD OBESITY REPORT OF THE COMMISSION ON ENDING CHILDHOOD OBESITY WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Report of the commission on ending childhood obesity. 1.Pediatric Obesity – prevention and control. 2.Child. 3.Feeding Behavior. 4.Food Habits. 5.Exercise. 6.Diet. 7.Health Promotion. 8.National Health Programs. I.World Health Organization. ISBN 978 92 4 151006 6 (NLM classification: WS 130) © World Health Organization 2016 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization are available on the WHO website (www.who.int) or can be purchased from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications –whether for sale or for non-commercial distribution– should be addressed to WHO Press through the WHO website (www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/en/index.html). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted and dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Providing Performance Feedback to Individual Physicians: Current Practice and Emerging Lessons
    WORKING P A P E R Providing Performance Feedback to Individual Physicians: Current Practice and Emerging Lessons Final Report STEPHANIE S. TELEKI, REBECCA SHAW, CHERYL L. DAMBERG, ELIZABETH A. MCGLYNN WR-381-CHCF July 2006 This product is part of the RAND Health working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers’ latest findings and to solicit additional peer review. This paper has been peer reviewed but not edited. Unless otherwise indicated, working papers can be quoted and cited without permission of the author, provided the source is clearly referred to as a working paper. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. is a registered trademark. Providing Performance Feedback to Individual Physicians TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... v I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 1 II. STUDY METHODS ....................................................................................................... 2 A. Key Informant Interviews .................................................................................... 2 B. Literature Scan ....................................................................................................... 2 C. Environmental Scan .............................................................................................. 3 III. FINDINGS......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Health Care at the Crossroads: Emergency Preparedness Systems
    HealthHealth CareCare atat thethe CrossroadsCrossroads Strategies for Creating and Sustaining Community-wide Emergency Preparedness Systems Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations © Copyright 2003 by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means without written permission from the publisher. Request for permission to reprint: 630-792-5631. Health Care at the Crossroads Strategies for Creating and Sustaining Community-wide Emergency Preparedness Systems Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations Joint Commission Public Policy Initiative This white paper is the second work product of the Joint Commission’s new Public Policy Initiative. Launched in 2001, this initiative seeks to address broad issues that have the potential to seriously undermine the provision of safe, high-quality health care and, indeed, the health of the American people. These are issues which demand the attention and engagement of multiple publics if successful resolution is to be achieved. For each of the identified public policy issues, the Joint Commission already has state-of-the-art standards in place. However, simple application of these standards, and other unidi- mensional efforts,will leave this country far short of its health care goals and objectives. Thus, this paper does not describe new Joint Commission requirements for health care organizations, nor even suggest that new requirements will be forthcoming in the future. Rather, the Joint Commission has devised a public policy action plan that involves the gathering of information and multiple perspectives on the issue;formulation of comprehensive solutions; and assignment of accountabilities for these solutions.
    [Show full text]