DOCSLIB.ORG

On Inverses and Linear Independence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On Inverses and Linear Independence On Inverses and Linear Independence A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Jeremy S. Moore June 2011 © 2011 Jeremy S. Moore. All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled On Inverses and Linear Independence by JEREMY S. MOORE has been approved for the Department of Mathematics and the College of Arts and Sciences by Sergio Lopez-Permouth´ Professor of Mathematics Benjamin M. Ogles Dean for College of Arts and Sciences 3 Abstract MOORE, JEREMY S., Ph.D., June 2011, Mathematics On Inverses and Linear Independence (66 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Sergio Lopez-Permouth´ We study various connections between the notions of invertibility of elements and linear independence of subsets of algebras over (not necessarily commutative) rings. The main emphasis is on two such notions: invertible and fluid algebras. We introduce a hierarchy of notions about algebras having a basis B consisting entirely of units. Such a basis is called an invertible basis and algebras that have invertible bases are said to be invertible algebras. The conditions considered in that hierarchy include the requirement that for an invertible basis B, the set of inverses B−1 be itself a basis, the notion that B be closed under inverses and the idea that B be closed under products under a slight commutativity requirement. Among other results, it is shown that this last property is unique of group rings. Many examples are considered and it is determined that the hierarchy is for the most part strict. For any field F , F2, all semisimple F-algebras are invertible. Semisimple invertible F2-algebras are fully characterized. Likewise, the question of which single-variable polynomials over a field yield invertible quotient rings of the F-algebra F[x] is completely answered. Connections between invertible algebras and S-rings (rings generated by units) are also explored. While group rings are the archetype of invertible algebras, this notion is general enough to include many other families of algebras. For example, field extensions and all crossed products (including in particular skew and twisted group rings) are invertible algebras. We consider invertible bases B such that for any two elements from B, a scalar multiple of their product belongs to B. Alternatively, one may consider invertible bases with the requirement that for every basis element, a scalar multiple of its inverse must also be in the basis. We refer to these algebras, respectively, as being scalarly closed under 4 products and scalarly closed under inverses. We explore connections between these ideas and crossed products, twisted group rings, and skew group rings. We show that matrix rings over arbitrary rings are invertible algebras and also determine some types of infinite matrix rings which are invertible too. We conclude the dissertation considering the property that sets of inverses of linearly independent invertible elements be also linearly independent. We refer to algebras with this property as fluid algebras. Fluidity of direct sums will be considered. We will characterize which single-variable polynomials over a field yield fluid quotient algebras of the F-algebra F[x]. We apply those results to establish when finite field extensions are fluid algebras. Also we will show that infinite field extensions are rarely fluid. We then define the fluidity of an R-algebra A to be an integer, such that for every set of n or less linearly independent invertible elements, their inverses are also linearly independent. The fluidity of various families of algebras such as matrix rings and field extensions is explored. Approved: Sergio Lopez-Permouth´ Professor of Mathematics 5 I dedicate this work to all my friends and family. I feel truly blessed to have these people in my life and would not be where or who I am today without them. 6 Acknowledgements I would like to thank Dr. Sergio Lopez-Permouth, my advisor, for his assistance and guidance. I have learned extensively from his knowledge and wisdom of mathematics. Not only that but his dedication, joy, and patience in this process will strengthen me as a mathematician and educator. I would like to thank Kelly, my future wife, who, throughout this process has been nothing short of amazing. Her care and support has been invaluable and words would not be able to express my gratitude. I would like to thank Cindy, Eric and Josh Moore, my mother, father and brother, for their love and understanding during this process and all through my life. I would like to thank Dr. Steve Noltie, who, encouraged me to pursue mathematics as an undergraduate freshman. I would like to thank Dr. Franco Guerriero, for being available and helping with questions as I studied for the algebra comprehensive exam and participating as one of my committee members. I would like to thank the following people for their insight and communication during my studies: Dr. Steve Szabo, Dr. Ryan Botts, Josh Beal, Don Daws, Chris Holston, Ryan Schweibert, Dr. Benigno Parra, Eric Heinzman, Doug Hoffman, and Dr. Ashish Srivastava. In addition, I would like to thank the various faculty members of the Ohio University Mathematics Department. Your assistance and care for students’ success has been admirable. 7 Table of Contents Abstract.........................................3 Dedication........................................5 Acknowledgements...................................6 List of Figures......................................8 1 Preface........................................9 2 Introduction and Preliminaries........................... 11 2.1 Introduction.................................. 11 2.2 Definitions................................... 13 3 Invertible Algebras................................. 16 3.1 Definitions and Preliminary Results..................... 16 3.2 General Results and Some Families of Invertible Algebras......... 21 3.3 Trivial Units.................................. 29 4 Further Results on Invertible Algebras....................... 33 4.1 Infinite Dimensional Invertible Algebras................... 33 4.2 Linear Closed Under Products and Inverses................. 36 4.3 Scalar Closed Under Products and Inverses................. 41 5 Fluidity....................................... 51 5.1 Definitions and Preliminary Results..................... 51 5.2 Fluid Field Extensions and Related Ideas................... 54 5.3 Fluid Matrix Algebras............................. 60 References........................................ 66 8 List of Figures 4.1 Hierarchy of Invertibility............................. 50 9 1 Preface In this dissertation we initiate the study of two new notions regarding the units of an algebra A over a (not necessarily commutative) ring R and the linear independence of its subsets. We call them invertible and fluid algebras. An algebra A over a ring R is said to be an invertible algebra if it has a basis B consisting entirely of units; such a basis is said to be an invertible basis. There are many instances of invertible algebras in the literature. For example, a field extension E of a field F is an example of a case when E is viewed as an algebra over F. In fact, obviously the same is true for division ring extensions. A group ring R[G] over a ring R is a strikingly different example; twisted and skew group rings as well as their common generalization the crossed products are also examples of invertible algebras. When the base ring R is a field, invertible algebras are an example of the S -rings studied in [13] but, in general, the connection does not necessarily hold. In fact, while there is some affinity between the notion of invertible algebras and the various concepts in the literature dealing with rings generated by their units [2], [14], the affinity is only superficial and no real connection seems to exist. Obviously, a notion general enough to encompass so many different types of algebras will be too general to yield very many results since these results would have to be properties that are common to such a diverse collection of examples. For that reason, the reasonable way to proceed is to consider various layers of restrictions on invertible algebras and establish a hierarchy of notions that bring us closer or move us farther away from the known examples. Taking group rings as a motivation, in Chapter3 we consider various such restrictions and find that they constitute a hierarchy. We notice, in particular, that the hierarchy is for the most part strict. Similar conditions but based on the two main examples of crossed products (the skew and twisted group rings) are also considered in Chapter4. A common thread in Chapters3 and4 is the consideration of the extent to 10 which known results about group rings and crossed products extend to invertible algebras. The invertibility of specific families of algebras is also a recurring theme as we discover, for example, that matrix rings and single-variable polynomial factor rings over a field (other than F2) are examples of invertible algebras. A new idea arose during our research of invertible algebras. This idea requires for every set of linearly independent units of an algebra, we have their inverses also remain linearly independent, such algebras we call fluid algebras. Despite the naturality of this notion, there does not seem to be any literature on this type of problem. A motivation for this study was the idea of invertible-2. However, for fluid algebras it is required that for every set of linearly independent invertible elements S, the set of inverses S−1 also be linearly independent, while invertible-2 only asks that there exist one such a set (and that it be a basis!) In fact, a fluid algebra need not even be an invertible algebra. 11 2 Introduction and Preliminaries 2.1 Introduction This dissertation is about the interactions between two topics: invertibility of elements and linear independence of subsets. We have noticed that there does not seem to be much published mathematical research on such connections. First we investigate the idea of algebras having bases consisting entirely of units. We consider various types of these so-called invertible bases.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Invertible Matrix Theorem
    The Invertible Matrix Theorem Ryan C. Daileda Trinity University Linear Algebra Daileda The Invertible Matrix Theorem Introduction It is important to recognize when a square matrix is invertible. We can now characterize invertibility in terms of every one of the concepts we have now encountered. We will continue to develop criteria for invertibility, adding them to our list as we go. The invertibility of a matrix is also related to the invertibility of linear transformations, which we discuss below. Daileda The Invertible Matrix Theorem Theorem 1 (The Invertible Matrix Theorem) For a square (n × n) matrix A, TFAE: a. A is invertible. b. A has a pivot in each row/column. RREF c. A −−−→ I. d. The equation Ax = 0 only has the solution x = 0. e. The columns of A are linearly independent. f. Null A = {0}. g. A has a left inverse (BA = In for some B). h. The transformation x 7→ Ax is one to one. i. The equation Ax = b has a (unique) solution for any b. j. Col A = Rn. k. A has a right inverse (AC = In for some C). l. The transformation x 7→ Ax is onto. m. AT is invertible. Daileda The Invertible Matrix Theorem Inverse Transforms Definition A linear transformation T : Rn → Rn (also called an endomorphism of Rn) is called invertible iff it is both one-to-one and onto. If [T ] is the standard matrix for T , then we know T is given by x 7→ [T ]x. The Invertible Matrix Theorem tells us that this transformation is invertible iff [T ] is invertible.
    [Show full text]
  • Linear Independence, Span, and Basis of a Set of Vectors What Is Linear Independence?
    LECTURENOTES · purdue university MA 26500 Kyle Kloster Linear Algebra October 22, 2014 Linear Independence, Span, and Basis of a Set of Vectors What is linear independence? A set of vectors S = fv1; ··· ; vkg is linearly independent if none of the vectors vi can be written as a linear combination of the other vectors, i.e. vj = α1v1 + ··· + αkvk. Suppose the vector vj can be written as a linear combination of the other vectors, i.e. there exist scalars αi such that vj = α1v1 + ··· + αkvk holds. (This is equivalent to saying that the vectors v1; ··· ; vk are linearly dependent). We can subtract vj to move it over to the other side to get an expression 0 = α1v1 + ··· αkvk (where the term vj now appears on the right hand side. In other words, the condition that \the set of vectors S = fv1; ··· ; vkg is linearly dependent" is equivalent to the condition that there exists αi not all of which are zero such that 2 3 α1 6α27 0 = v v ··· v 6 7 : 1 2 k 6 . 7 4 . 5 αk More concisely, form the matrix V whose columns are the vectors vi. Then the set S of vectors vi is a linearly dependent set if there is a nonzero solution x such that V x = 0. This means that the condition that \the set of vectors S = fv1; ··· ; vkg is linearly independent" is equivalent to the condition that \the only solution x to the equation V x = 0 is the zero vector, i.e. x = 0. How do you determine if a set is lin.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover Linear Algebra Incomplete Preliminary Draft
    Discover Linear Algebra Incomplete Preliminary Draft Date: November 28, 2017 L´aszl´oBabai in collaboration with Noah Halford All rights reserved. Approved for instructional use only. Commercial distribution prohibited. c 2016 L´aszl´oBabai. Last updated: November 10, 2016 Preface TO BE WRITTEN. Babai: Discover Linear Algebra. ii This chapter last updated August 21, 2016 c 2016 L´aszl´oBabai. Contents Notation ix I Matrix Theory 1 Introduction to Part I 2 1 (F, R) Column Vectors 3 1.1 (F) Column vector basics . 3 1.1.1 The domain of scalars . 3 1.2 (F) Subspaces and span . 6 1.3 (F) Linear independence and the First Miracle of Linear Algebra . 8 1.4 (F) Dot product . 12 1.5 (R) Dot product over R ................................. 14 1.6 (F) Additional exercises . 14 2 (F) Matrices 15 2.1 Matrix basics . 15 2.2 Matrix multiplication . 18 2.3 Arithmetic of diagonal and triangular matrices . 22 2.4 Permutation Matrices . 24 2.5 Additional exercises . 26 3 (F) Matrix Rank 28 3.1 Column and row rank . 28 iii iv CONTENTS 3.2 Elementary operations and Gaussian elimination . 29 3.3 Invariance of column and row rank, the Second Miracle of Linear Algebra . 31 3.4 Matrix rank and invertibility . 33 3.5 Codimension (optional) . 34 3.6 Additional exercises . 35 4 (F) Theory of Systems of Linear Equations I: Qualitative Theory 38 4.1 Homogeneous systems of linear equations . 38 4.2 General systems of linear equations . 40 5 (F, R) Affine and Convex Combinations (optional) 42 5.1 (F) Affine combinations .
    [Show full text]
  • Linear Independence, the Wronskian, and Variation of Parameters
    LINEAR INDEPENDENCE, THE WRONSKIAN, AND VARIATION OF PARAMETERS JAMES KEESLING In this post we determine when a set of solutions of a linear differential equation are linearly independent. We first discuss the linear space of solutions for a homogeneous differential equation. 1. Homogeneous Linear Differential Equations We start with homogeneous linear nth-order ordinary differential equations with general coefficients. The form for the nth-order type of equation is the following. dnx dn−1x (1) a (t) + a (t) + ··· + a (t)x = 0 n dtn n−1 dtn−1 0 It is straightforward to solve such an equation if the functions ai(t) are all constants. However, for general functions as above, it may not be so easy. However, we do have a principle that is useful. Because the equation is linear and homogeneous, if we have a set of solutions fx1(t); : : : ; xn(t)g, then any linear combination of the solutions is also a solution. That is (2) x(t) = C1x1(t) + C2x2(t) + ··· + Cnxn(t) is also a solution for any choice of constants fC1;C2;:::;Cng. Now if the solutions fx1(t); : : : ; xn(t)g are linearly independent, then (2) is the general solution of the differential equation. We will explain why later. What does it mean for the functions, fx1(t); : : : ; xn(t)g, to be linearly independent? The simple straightforward answer is that (3) C1x1(t) + C2x2(t) + ··· + Cnxn(t) = 0 implies that C1 = 0, C2 = 0, ::: , and Cn = 0 where the Ci's are arbitrary constants. This is the definition, but it is not so easy to determine from it just when the condition holds to show that a given set of functions, fx1(t); x2(t); : : : ; xng, is linearly independent.
    [Show full text]
  • Math 54. Selected Solutions for Week 8 Section 6.1 (Page 282) 22. Let U = U1 U2 U3 . Explain Why U · U ≥ 0. Wh
    Math 54. Selected Solutions for Week 8 Section 6.1 (Page 282) 2 3 u1 22. Let ~u = 4 u2 5 . Explain why ~u · ~u ≥ 0 . When is ~u · ~u = 0 ? u3 2 2 2 We have ~u · ~u = u1 + u2 + u3 , which is ≥ 0 because it is a sum of squares (all of which are ≥ 0 ). It is zero if and only if ~u = ~0 . Indeed, if ~u = ~0 then ~u · ~u = 0 , as 2 can be seen directly from the formula. Conversely, if ~u · ~u = 0 then all the terms ui must be zero, so each ui must be zero. This implies ~u = ~0 . 2 5 3 26. Let ~u = 4 −6 5 , and let W be the set of all ~x in R3 such that ~u · ~x = 0 . What 7 theorem in Chapter 4 can be used to show that W is a subspace of R3 ? Describe W in geometric language. The condition ~u · ~x = 0 is equivalent to ~x 2 Nul ~uT , and this is a subspace of R3 by Theorem 2 on page 187. Geometrically, it is the plane perpendicular to ~u and passing through the origin. 30. Let W be a subspace of Rn , and let W ? be the set of all vectors orthogonal to W . Show that W ? is a subspace of Rn using the following steps. (a). Take ~z 2 W ? , and let ~u represent any element of W . Then ~z · ~u = 0 . Take any scalar c and show that c~z is orthogonal to ~u . (Since ~u was an arbitrary element of W , this will show that c~z is in W ? .) ? (b).
    [Show full text]
  • Span, Linear Independence and Basis Rank and Nullity
    Remarks for Exam 2 in Linear Algebra Span, linear independence and basis The span of a set of vectors is the set of all linear combinations of the vectors. A set of vectors is linearly independent if the only solution to c1v1 + ::: + ckvk = 0 is ci = 0 for all i. Given a set of vectors, you can determine if they are linearly independent by writing the vectors as the columns of the matrix A, and solving Ax = 0. If there are any non-zero solutions, then the vectors are linearly dependent. If the only solution is x = 0, then they are linearly independent. A basis for a subspace S of Rn is a set of vectors that spans S and is linearly independent. There are many bases, but every basis must have exactly k = dim(S) vectors. A spanning set in S must contain at least k vectors, and a linearly independent set in S can contain at most k vectors. A spanning set in S with exactly k vectors is a basis. A linearly independent set in S with exactly k vectors is a basis. Rank and nullity The span of the rows of matrix A is the row space of A. The span of the columns of A is the column space C(A). The row and column spaces always have the same dimension, called the rank of A. Let r = rank(A). Then r is the maximal number of linearly independent row vectors, and the maximal number of linearly independent column vectors. So if r < n then the columns are linearly dependent; if r < m then the rows are linearly dependent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Invertible Matrix Theorem II in Section 2.8, We Gave a List of Characterizations of Invertible Matrices (Theorem 2.8.1)
    i i “main” 2007/2/16 page 312 i i 312 CHAPTER 4 Vector Spaces For Problems 9–12, determine the solution set to Ax = b, 14. Show that a 6 × 4 matrix A with nullity(A) = 0 must and show that all solutions are of the form (4.9.3). have rowspace(A) = R4. Is colspace(A) = R4? 13−1 4 15. Prove that if rowspace(A) = nullspace(A), then A 9. A = 27 9 , b = 11 . contains an even number of columns. 15 21 10 16. Show that a 5×7 matrix A must have 2 ≤ nullity(A) ≤ 2 −114 5 7. Give an example of a 5 × 7 matrix A with 10. A = 1 −123 , b = 6 . nullity(A) = 2 and an example of a 5 × 7 matrix 1 −255 13 A with nullity(A) = 7. 11−2 −3 17. Show that 3 × 8 matrix A must have 5 ≤ nullity(A) ≤ 3 −1 −7 2 8. Give an example of a 3 × 8 matrix A with 11. A = , b = . 111 0 nullity(A) = 5 and an example of a 3 × 8 matrix 22−4 −6 A with nullity(A) = 8. 11−15 0 18. Prove that if A and B are n × n matrices and A is 12. A = 02−17 , b = 0 . invertible, then 42−313 0 nullity(AB) = nullity(B). 13. Show that a 3 × 7 matrix A with nullity(A) = 4 must have colspace(A) = R3. Is rowspace(A) = R3? [Hint: Bx = 0 if and only if ABx = 0.] 4.10 The Invertible Matrix Theorem II In Section 2.8, we gave a list of characterizations of invertible matrices (Theorem 2.8.1).
    [Show full text]
  • Rotation Matrix - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Page 1 of 22
    Rotation matrix - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Page 1 of 22 Rotation matrix From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In linear algebra, a rotation matrix is a matrix that is used to perform a rotation in Euclidean space. For example the matrix rotates points in the xy -Cartesian plane counterclockwise through an angle θ about the origin of the Cartesian coordinate system. To perform the rotation, the position of each point must be represented by a column vector v, containing the coordinates of the point. A rotated vector is obtained by using the matrix multiplication Rv (see below for details). In two and three dimensions, rotation matrices are among the simplest algebraic descriptions of rotations, and are used extensively for computations in geometry, physics, and computer graphics. Though most applications involve rotations in two or three dimensions, rotation matrices can be defined for n-dimensional space. Rotation matrices are always square, with real entries. Algebraically, a rotation matrix in n-dimensions is a n × n special orthogonal matrix, i.e. an orthogonal matrix whose determinant is 1: . The set of all rotation matrices forms a group, known as the rotation group or the special orthogonal group. It is a subset of the orthogonal group, which includes reflections and consists of all orthogonal matrices with determinant 1 or -1, and of the special linear group, which includes all volume-preserving transformations and consists of matrices with determinant 1. Contents 1 Rotations in two dimensions 1.1 Non-standard orientation
    [Show full text]
  • On Bounds and Closed Form Expressions for Capacities Of
    On Bounds and Closed Form Expressions for Capacities of Discrete Memoryless Channels with Invertible Positive Matrices Thuan Nguyen Thinh Nguyen School of Electrical and School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Computer Engineering Oregon State University Oregon State University Corvallis, OR, 97331 Corvallis, 97331 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Abstract—While capacities of discrete memoryless channels are That said, it is still beneficial to find the channel capacity well studied, it is still not possible to obtain a closed form expres- in closed form expression for a number of reasons. These sion for the capacity of an arbitrary discrete memoryless channel. include (1) formulas can often provide a good intuition about This paper describes an elementary technique based on Karush- Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions to obtain (1) a good upper bound the relationship between the capacity and different channel of a discrete memoryless channel having an invertible positive parameters, (2) formulas offer a faster way to determine the channel matrix and (2) a closed form expression for the capacity capacity than that of algorithms, and (3) formulas are useful if the channel matrix satisfies certain conditions related to its for analytical derivations where closed form expression of the singular value and its Gershgorin’s disk. capacity is needed in the intermediate steps. To that end, our Index Terms—Wireless Communication, Convex Optimization, Channel Capacity, Mutual Information. paper describes an elementary technique based on the theory of convex optimization, to find closed form expressions for (1) a new upper bound on capacities of discrete memoryless I. INTRODUCTION channels with positive invertible channel matrix and (2) the Discrete memoryless channels (DMC) play a critical role optimality conditions of the channel matrix such that the upper in the early development of information theory and its ap- bound is precisely the capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9 Eigenvectors and Eigenvalues
    Chapter 9 Eigenvectors and Eigenvalues 9.1 Eigenvectors and Eigenvalues of a Linear Map Given a finite-dimensional vector space E,letf : E E ! be any linear map. If, by luck, there is a basis (e1,...,en) of E with respect to which f is represented by a diagonal matrix λ1 0 ... 0 0 λ ... D = 2 , 0 . ... ... 0 1 B 0 ... 0 λ C B nC @ A then the action of f on E is very simple; in every “direc- tion” ei,wehave f(ei)=λiei. 511 512 CHAPTER 9. EIGENVECTORS AND EIGENVALUES We can think of f as a transformation that stretches or shrinks space along the direction e1,...,en (at least if E is a real vector space). In terms of matrices, the above property translates into the fact that there is an invertible matrix P and a di- agonal matrix D such that a matrix A can be factored as 1 A = PDP− . When this happens, we say that f (or A)isdiagonaliz- able,theλisarecalledtheeigenvalues of f,andtheeis are eigenvectors of f. For example, we will see that every symmetric matrix can be diagonalized. 9.1. EIGENVECTORS AND EIGENVALUES OF A LINEAR MAP 513 Unfortunately, not every matrix can be diagonalized. For example, the matrix 11 A = 1 01 ✓ ◆ can’t be diagonalized. Sometimes, a matrix fails to be diagonalizable because its eigenvalues do not belong to the field of coefficients, such as 0 1 A = , 2 10− ✓ ◆ whose eigenvalues are i. ± This is not a serious problem because A2 can be diago- nalized over the complex numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Invertible Matrix Theorem
    Math 240 TA: Shuyi Weng Winter 2017 February 6, 2017 The Invertible Matrix Theorem Theorem 1. Let A 2 Rn×n. Then the following statements are equivalent. 1. A is invertible. 2. A is row equivalent to In. 3. A has n pivots in its reduced echelon form. 4. The matrix equation Ax = 0 has only the trivial solution. 5. The columns of A are linearly independent. 6. The linear transformation T defined by T (x) = Ax is one-to-one. 7. The equation Ax = b has at least one solution for every b 2 Rn. 8. The columns of A span Rn. 9. The linear transformation T defined by T (x) = Ax is onto. 10. There exists an n × n matrix B such that AB = In. 11. There exists an n × n matrix C such that CA = In. 12. AT is invertible. Theorem 2. Let T : Rn ! Rn be defined by T (x) = Ax. Then T is one-to-one and onto if and only if A is an invertible matrix. Problem. True or false (all matrices are assumed to be n × n, unless otherwise specified). 1. The identity matrix is invertible. 2. If A can be row reduced to the identity matrix, then it is invertible. 3. If both A and B are invertible, so is AB. 4. If A is invertible, then the matrix equation Ax = b is consistent for every b 2 Rn. n 5. If A is an n × n matrix such that the equation Ax = ei is consistent for each ei 2 R a column of the n × n identity matrix, then A is invertible.
    [Show full text]
  • Homogeneous Systems (1.5) Linear Independence and Dependence (1.7)
    Math 20F, 2015SS1 / TA: Jor-el Briones / Sec: A01 / Handout Page 1 of3 Homogeneous systems (1.5) Homogenous systems are linear systems in the form Ax = 0, where 0 is the 0 vector. Given a system Ax = b, suppose x = α + t1α1 + t2α2 + ::: + tkαk is a solution (in parametric form) to the system, for any values of t1; t2; :::; tk. Then α is a solution to the system Ax = b (seen by seeting t1 = ::: = tk = 0), and α1; α2; :::; αk are solutions to the homoegeneous system Ax = 0. Terms you should know The zero solution (trivial solution): The zero solution is the 0 vector (a vector with all entries being 0), which is always a solution to the homogeneous system Particular solution: Given a system Ax = b, suppose x = α + t1α1 + t2α2 + ::: + tkαk is a solution (in parametric form) to the system, α is the particular solution to the system. The other terms constitute the solution to the associated homogeneous system Ax = 0. Properties of a Homegeneous System 1. A homogeneous system is ALWAYS consistent, since the zero solution, aka the trivial solution, is always a solution to that system. 2. A homogeneous system with at least one free variable has infinitely many solutions. 3. A homogeneous system with more unknowns than equations has infinitely many solu- tions 4. If α1; α2; :::; αk are solutions to a homogeneous system, then ANY linear combination of α1; α2; :::; αk is also a solution to the homogeneous system Important theorems to know Theorem. (Chapter 1, Theorem 6) Given a consistent system Ax = b, suppose α is a solution to the system.
    [Show full text]