Oiled Wildlife Response Manual Posow

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Oiled Wildlife Response Manual Posow POSOW Preparedness for Oil-polluted Shoreline POSOW cleanup and Oiled Wildlife interventions OILED WILDLIFE RESPONSE MANUAL in partnership with POSOW is a project co-financed by the EU under the Civil Protection Financial Instrument developed in cooperation with ISPRA, Cedre, Sea Alarm and CPMR and coordinated by REMPEC a regional Centre of the Barcelona Convention Disclaimer All material produced under POSOW is available free of charge and shall not be used for any commercial purposes. Any amendment, review, and update of the material produced under the project shall be authorised by POSOW’s Partners and shall refer to the origi- nal document developed under the project. POSOW’s Partners do not assert that this material is faultless and make no warranty, nor assume any legal liability for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of this manual. POSOW’s Partners do not assume res- ponsibility or liability for any direct, indirect or consequential da- mages from the use of this material. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrie- val system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electro- nic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior consent of POSOW’s Partners. www.posow.org Also available on POSOW website: Manuals, PowerPoint Presentations, Posters, Video, Brochure and Database of volunteers. OILED WILDLIFE RESPONSE MANUAL Authors: The Oiled Wildlife Response Manual has been prepared by the Sea Alarm Foundation in consultation with all project partners. The authors are grateful for the contribution of the CVFSE (Centre Vétérinaire de la Faune Sauvage et des Écosystèmes), France and WWF (World Wildlife Fund), Finland. Publication: March 2013 Legal deposit upon publication Printed in Malta, by Progress Press Co. Ltd. Progress Press holds certification for the Forest Stewardship Council Chain of Custody standard. Cover photo: This means that the product comes from a forest that is well managed according to strict © Sea Alarm environmental, social and economic standard. 3 Presentation of the project The project for Preparedness for Oil-polluted Shoreline cleanup and Oiled Wildlife interventions – POSOW, coordinated by the Regional Marine Pollution Emergency Response Centre for the Mediterranean Sea (REMPEC) was co-financed by the European Commission under the Civil Protection Financial Instrument, to improve preparedness and response to marine pollution in the Mediterranean region. By providing training courses and material to civil protection professionals and volunteers, in cooperation with local competent authorities, the project aims at improving the effectiveness of emergency response to shoreline pollution fol- lowing an oil spill in European coastal countries of the Mediterranean Sea. It is implemented by REMPEC and the following partners: the Centre of Documen- tation, Research and Experimentation on Accidental Water Pollution (Cedre), the Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), Sea Alarm Founda- tion, and the Conference of Peripheral Maritime Regions of Europe (CPMR). Purpose of the manual This manual is one of 4 manuals produced in the framework of the POSOW project (the others are Oiled Shoreline Assessment, Oiled Shoreline Cleanup and Oil Spill Volunteer Management). This manual is designed to help teams of volunteers to understand and implement field wildlife response operations which have been assigned to them by authori- ties in charge of the response. The document is divided in two parts: Part 1: background, general principles of oiled wildlife response and presentation of wildlife response actions and tasks which can be undertaken by volunteers Part 2: technical sheets to be used in the field and on the work floor The manual is designed for volunteers and all wildlife responders who: → are working at onshore wildlife response operational sites → have little or no previous knowledge of wildlife response → may undertake certain wildlife response activities on land and on the shoreline → may potentially be in contact with oil and wild animals. A number of oiled wildlife response activities should not be undertaken by vo- lunteers as they require more in-depth training and experience to be conducted safely and effectively. Throughout this manual, it will be made clear which wildlife response tasks POSOW-trained volunteers may undertake and where they may need to work under supervision of trained experts. 4 Page n° Table of contents 7 PART 1 - GENERAL PRINCIPLES 8 Oiled wildlife response 9 The use and position of response volunteers 10 Jobs for volunteers 11 Vulnerable wildlife in the Mediterranean 18 Health and safety for volunteers 19 Health and safety on the oiled shoreline 20 Health and safety in a rehabilitation facility 22 Search and collection of animals 25 Animal transport 26 Animal arrival and reception 27 Intake and triage 28 Pre-wash care and stabilisation 31 The washing process 32 Post-wash care and waterproofing on pools 33 Release 34 What to expect as a volunteer 35 PART 2 - FORMS AND GUIDANCE DATASHEETS 36 Managing the early days of a wildlife response datasheet 1 37 Capturing live animals datasheet 2 38 Setup and layout of a forward holding centre datasheet 3 39 Overview of oiled wildlife rehabilitation datasheet 4 40 Working in the arrival and reception area datasheet 5 41 Medical record form datasheet 6 42 Holding a bird datasheet 7 43 Tubing a bird for rehydration datasheet 8 45 Daily routine – stabilisation datasheet 9 46 Daily routine – pre-wash care of stabilised birds datasheet 10 47 Setting up and running a command centre datasheet 11 48 Equipment for pre-wash care and stabilisation datasheet 12 49 Animal housing datasheet 13 50 Dealing with live oiled sea turtles datasheet 14 51 Contact details for incident assistance datasheet 15 53 PART 3 - FURTHER INFORMATION 54 Glossary and acronyms 56 Bibliography 58 Useful websites 5 6 PART 1 GENERAL PRINCIPLES Oiled wildlife response 8 The use and position of response volunteers 9 Jobs for volunteers 10 Vulnerable wildlife in the Mediterranean 11 Health and safety for volunteers 18 Health and safety on the oiled shoreline 19 Health and safety in a rehabilitation facility 20 Search and collection of animals 22 Animal transport 25 Animal arrival and reception 26 Intake and triage 27 Pre-wash care and stabilisation 28 The washing process 31 Post-wash care and waterproofing on pools 32 Release 33 What to expect as a volunteer 34 7 Oiled wildlife response Some marine animals, such as marine and cleaning and rehabilitation in specia- Volunteers being coastal birds, sea turtles, seals and otters lised facilities, or alternatively ending briefed on arrival are extremely sensitive to oiling. This is suffering by euthanasia). Sometimes, because these animals use the water sur- circumstances and weather conditions face (where oil floats) to rest, dive through do not allow active mitigation, or health WRCO from above to feed, or to break through and safety considerations (which come © from beneath to breathe. The effects of first at all times) can even prevent acti- oiling may be lethal and many animals vities from being undertaken at all. affected by the oil will die at sea. Howe- Amongst the greatest challenges of ver, a certain number of oiled animals wildlife response is the question of how (dead or alive) may arrive at the nearest many animals will be affected, at what coast. Depending on the circumstances scale resources (manpower, experts, this could range from only a few animals equipment...) will have to be mobilised, to hundreds or thousands if the oil spill and how to deal with public/media expec- occurs in the middle of an important habi- tations. Especially in the first days after tat and season. Large numbers of ani- the spill, important decisions have to be mals arriving ashore may cause a serious made and it will take time before a wildlife challenge to the affected country and this response can become operational. If in needs special consideration as part of the those days animals already start coming oil spill response activities. It needs an ashore, they need to be taken care of by integrated oiled wildlife response which nearby responders. These responders is best is planned within the framework could include volunteers, if well-coordina- of a local or national oil spill contingency ted and supervised. plan. An oiled wildlife response includes any activity that can be undertaken to deal This manual describes what a group of with wild animals that are/may be affected volunteers could establish and how to by oil following a marine oil spill: do so in the case of live animals coming ashore during an oil spill, focusing on birds Pro-active measures to minimise the → as these are likely to be affected in larger impact on wildlife (removing the oil numbers. This manual and associated before it reaches sensitive areas, pro- training will lead to basic knowledge and tecting these areas by keeping the oil skills that volunteers should have to be out, or taking animals, nests or eggs able to respond in self-coordinated groups away from the threatened areas, by or work under supervision of professional disturbing through hazing or capturing/ wildlife responders. This material can be collecting them). used to start developing local capability in → Measures to mitigate the effects of countries that aim to establish some level oil on animals (attempting capture, of wildlife response preparedness. 8 The use and position of response volunteers The work of volunteers is crucial for the situation one or two volunteers from the labour intensive activities of a wildlife res- group need to take a leadership role to Volunteers being ponse. The more trained volunteers are, ensure that all activities are at least well- instructed in a temporary the more valuable their contribution to coordinated and resources are used opti- wildlife rehab centre the success of an operation will be. The- mally, in close cooperation with, and under refore it is always worthwhile to invest in supervision of the authorities in charge.
Recommended publications
  • The Good, the Bad and the Ugly of COVID-19 Lockdown Effects on Wildlife Conservation Insights from the First European Locked Do
    Biological Conservation 249 (2020) 108728 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Perspective The good, the bad and the ugly of COVID-19 lockdown effects on wildlife conservation: Insights from the first European locked down country T ⁎ Raoul Manentia, , Emiliano Morib, Viola Di Canioa, Silvia Mercurioa, Marco Piconec, Mario Caffid, Mattia Brambillae,f, Gentile Francesco Ficetolaa,g, Diego Rubolinia a Dipartimento di Scienze e Politiche Ambientali, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 26, I-20133 Milano, Italy b Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Ricerca sugli Ecosistemi Terrestri, Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy c Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali, Informatica e Statistica, Università Ca' Foscari di Venezia, Via Torino 55, I-30172 Venezia, Italy d Osservatorio Ornitologico Pianura Bresciana ‘Padernello’, via Cavour 1, I-25022 Borgo San Giacomo, BS, Italy e Fondazione Lombardia per l'Ambiente, Settore biodiversità e aree protette, Largo 10 luglio 1976 1, I-20822 Seveso, MB, Italy f Museo delle Scienze, Sezione di Zoologia dei Vertebrati, Corso del Lavoro e della Scienza 3, I-38122 Trento, Italy g Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, LECA, Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, Rue de la Piscine 2233, F-38000 Grenoble, France ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The COVID-19 pandemic zoonosis has determined extensive lockdowns worldwide that provide an un- Coronavirus precedented opportunity to understand how large-scale shifts of human activities can impact wildlife. We ad- Conservation dressed the impacts of the COVID-19 lockdown on wildlife in Italy, the first European country that performed a Crisis countrywide lockdown, and identified potentially beneficial and negative consequences for wildlife conservation Pandemic and management.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Guide for Breeding Ecology of Kentish Plover
    Practical guide for investigating breeding ecology of Kentish plover Charadrius alexandrinus Tamás Székely, András Kosztolányi & Clemens Küpper Department of Biology & Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Version 3, 1 April 2008 Photos by T. Székely, A. Kosztolányi & C. Küpper Rationale The Kentish/snowy plover Charadrius alexandrinus is a small cosmopolitan shorebird (body mass about 40-44 g). In the last few years we have developed a suite of methods to investigate its behaviour and ecology in the field. We thought this practical guide may be useful for students and researchers with an interest in small plovers. Some aspects of these methods may be relevant for other shorebirds and ground-nesting birds in general. Our fundamental motivation in writing this guide is to show that the Kentish plover is an easy species to work with, if one is willing to pay attention to a few potential pitfalls. We hope that this guide will elicit further research. Please contact us if you have questions and comments, and let us know of any errors. Note that Kentish plovers have been studied in several countries and by a good range of researchers, and we don't claim that our methods work best. Many Kentish plover populations are now declining. You need to be sensible about fieldwork, and carefully evaluate the costs and benefits of using a particular method. The last thing you want is to put an extra burden on plover populations - they have a hard time anyway to cope with predators, floods and threats humans are imposing upon them.
    [Show full text]
  • Charadrius Alexandrinus (Kentish Plover)
    Charadrius alexandrinus (Kentish Plover) European Red List of Birds Supplementary Material The European Union (EU27) Red List assessments were based principally on the official data reported by EU Member States to the European Commission under Article 12 of the Birds Directive in 2013-14. For the European Red List assessments, similar data were sourced from BirdLife Partners and other collaborating experts in other European countries and territories. For more information, see BirdLife International (2015). Contents Reported national population sizes and trends p. 2 Trend maps of reported national population data p. 5 Sources of reported national population data p. 8 Species factsheet bibliography p. 13 Recommended citation BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Further information http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/euroredlist http://www.birdlife.org/europe-and-central-asia/european-red-list-birds-0 http://www.iucnredlist.org/initiatives/europe http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/species/redlist/ Data requests and feedback To request access to these data in electronic format, provide new information, correct any errors or provide feedback, please email [email protected]. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Charadrius alexandrinus (Kentish Plover) Table 1. Reported national breeding population size and trends in Europe1. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population trend4 Long-term population trend4 Subspecific population (where relevant) 2 territory) Size (pairs)3 Europe (%) Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Albania 200-450 1 2002-2012 medium - 10-20 2002-2012 medium - 10-30 1980-2012 medium Armenia 20-40 <1 2002-2012 medium ? ? Austria 40-45 <1 2008-2012 good 0 0 2001-2012 good + 20-30 1980-2012 good C.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report on a Fourth Winter Ornithological Survey in Libya, 20-31 January 2008
    Final report on a fourth winter ornithological survey in Libya, 20‐31 January 2008 Abdulmaula Hamza, Almokhtar Saied, Essam Bourass, Jaber Yahya, Michael Smart, Nicola Baccetti, Pierre Defos du Rau, Habib Dlensi and Hichem Azafzaf. 1. Background Winter ornithological surveys, mainly of wetlands, have been organised in Libya in January 2005, January 2006 and (at a slightly later date) in February 2007, under the aegis of the Environment General Authority (EGA) of Libya and of the Regional Activities Centre/Specially Protected Areas of UNEP’s Mediterranean Action Plan (Azafzaf et al 2005; Azafzaf et al 2006a; Etayeb et al 2007; Smart et al 2006). A fourth winter survey was organised in January 2008, once again under the aegis of these two bodies, and with essentially the same Libyan and non‐Libyan participants. A preliminary report giving an immediate summary of the findings and recommendations of the 2008 survey has already been produced (Hamza et al 2008b). The present final report reproduces the basic data from the preliminary report, with additional material and comment received since the publication of the preliminary report. 2. Objectives and areas covered The objectives of the survey were: (1) To identify possible wintering grounds of the Slender‐billed Curlew Numenius tenuirostris, and to obtain further up‐to‐date information on the status in Libya of this Critically Endangered (CR) species, under threat at global level, which is the subject of an AEWA Memorandum, and is included in Appendix II of the Mediterranean Action Plan. (2) To repeat the surveys of the previous winters, with coverage of additional sites in the southern oases.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIES INFORMATION SHEET Charadrius Alexandrinus
    SPECIES INFORMATION SHEET Charadrius alexandrinus English name: Scientific name: Kentish plover Charadrius alexandrinus Taxonomical group: Species authority: Class: Aves Linnaeus, 1758 Order: Charadriiformes Family: Charadriidae Subspecies, Variations, Synonyms: – Generation length: 6 years Past and current threats (Habitats Directive Future threats (Habitats Directive article 17 article 17 code): Tourism (G01), Alien species codes): Tourism (G01), Alien species (I01), (I01), Competition and predation (I02), Unknown Competition and predation (I02), Unknown (U) (U) IUCN Criteria: HELCOM Red List CR D1 Category: Critically Endangered Global / European IUCN Red List Category Annex I EU Birds Directive (BirdLife International 2004): yes LC / LC Annex II EU Birds Directive no Protection and Red List status in HELCOM countries: Subject of special conservation measures in the EU Member states (Birds Directive, Annex I) Denmark: EN, Estonia: NA, Finland: –, Germany: 1 (Critically endangered), Latvia: –, Lithuania: –, Poland: –, Russia: –, Sweden: RE Range description and general trends The Kentish plover is a widespread breeder in the coastal areas of western and southern Europe. The north-western European population is small and amounts not more than 1 300 bp. It has been declining for several decades (Berndt et al. 2002, Thorup 2006). At the Wadden Sea coast of Schleswig-Holstein, the Kentish plover has been declining from 600 bp in 1993 to 200 bp in 1999 (Berndt et al. 2002). In the Danish Wadden Sea – in particular on the beaches of the islands Fanø and Rømø – the population has fluctuated without a clear trend since the first countrywide survey in 1969 (Dybbro 1970); the breeding pair numbers Charadrius alexandrinus. Photo by Christoph Moning.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Birds in Trouble: a Framework for an Action Plan in the Wadden Sea
    Breeding birds in trouble: A framework for an action plan in the Wadden Sea Kees Koffijberg John Frikke Bernd Hälterlein Gundolf Reichert Hartmut Andretzke February 2016 Photo: G. Reichert Breeding birds in trouble: A framework for an action plan in the Wadden Sea 2 SUMMARY 3 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUNDS 4 2. TMAP BREEDING BIRD MONITORING 5 3. BREEDING BIRDS IN TROUBLE? 7 5. FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION 14 6. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION 19 REFERENCES 22 Text and graphics: Kees Koffijberg Lay‐out: Gerold Lüerßen Breeding birds in trouble: A framework for an action plan in the Wadden Sea 3 Summary Data from the bird monitoring schemes within TMAP have shown that breeding birds in the Wadden Sea are generally not doing well at the moment. Recent results show that 18 out of 29 monitored bird species are in decline. Among them are species for which the Wadden Sea hosts an important share of the flyway population, e.g. Redshank, Oystercatcher and Avocet. In the group of species showing "steady" declines, many breeding birds of coastal grasslands are found, for instance Lapwing, Black‐tailed Godwit, Common Snipe and Ruff. Common Snipe, Dunlin and Ruff are on the brink of extinction as breeding birds. Compared to previous assessments in Quality Status Reports, the number of species showing negative trends has further increased recently. Moreover, the rate of decrease has accelerated in several species, indicating breeding conditions are getting worse. Poor breeding success has been identified as an important driver for the declining populations. Especially in species like Oystercatcher, Avocet and Arctic Tern, there is a clear association between low breeding success, the general decline in numbers and the recent acceleration in the rate of decline.
    [Show full text]
  • Important Areas for Breeding Waders in Italy
    Tinarelli:Important areas for breedingwaders in Italy Important areasfor breeding wadersin Italy R. Tinarelli Tinarelli,R. 1998.Important areas for breedingwaders in Italy. International Wader Studies 10: 245-250. Twelvewader species bred regularly in Italy during1983-1994, in a wide rangeof habitats.A classificationof themost important habitats and areas used for breedingwas made by analysisof themost recent data on thedistribution and population size of eachspecies. Salt-pans were the mostimportant habitat both for thenumber of breedingspecies and the number of pairs. Salt-pans arealso the mostthreatened habitat in view of rapidand widespread habitat changes. R. Tinarelli,Via Massa Rapi 3,1-40064 Ozzano Ernilia, Bologna, Italy. Tu,apeaau,P.t998. Ba;•mae Mec?a o6•f?a]ma r]teaAatlI•fxca liyamiOB BH?aal•f. International g•ader Studies 10: 245-250. B ?o•elmet98,3-t994 rr. • H?aaio•perya,splto rne•Auaoc• t2 BUAO••ya,•o• • mu•gOM guanasone6U•OnOB. Anaau•M noBefimux gann• nopacn•Tpa.enum u nonyaa6uonnofi qHG•eHH•THKa•oro BHAa6•Aa cAeaaHa Kaacc•KaB•a • • 6•onoB • MeCT, •CUO•b3OBaHHNX•a rHe3AoBa•a. Baccefi• •a •cna•a •o•ofi BoA•6• ca• Ba•H• 6u•ona• •a• gas•ucaa rH•auxca B•AOB,TaI • Aaa•caa nap.BB•Ay 6•CTp• • m•Ko-pacn•TpaHeHH• u3MeHeH•i6UOTOnOB, TaKue 6acceiH•, Ta•xe, NBaN•TCa •T•uTa•ue•, •axoga•u•ca hog•au•abmel yr•i. Introduction havebeen produced, as for all thebreeding birds in Italy in the period1983-1986, by Brichetti& Thispaper highlights the most important areas and Meschini (1993) in the framework of the Italian habitatsfor breedingwaders in Italy,both at Atlas.
    [Show full text]
  • Charadrius Nivosus
    Commentary - CeutaOPEN, individual-based field observations of breeding snowy plovers Charadrius nivosus Tamás Székely1,2, András Kosztolányi3, M. Cristina Carmona-Isunza4 & Martin Alejandro Serrano-Meneses5 1 Milner Centre for Evolution, Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK 2 Department of Evolutionary Zoology and Human Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen 4010, Hungary 3 Department of Ecology, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, Budapest 1078, Hungary 4 Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, México 5 Departamento de Ciencias Químico-Biológicas, Universidad de las Américas Puebla, San Andrés Cholula, Puebla 72810, México Corresponding author: [email protected] 1 Abstract Eberhart-Phillips et al. (2020) recently published a data-paper CeutaOPEN. However, the publication has significant shortcomings: the article does not explain the history nor the context of the project, it did not give credit to the developers of field methodology and data structure, and fails to acknowledge key contributions to the project. We request correcting these shortcomings. Data publishing (i.e., releasing research data in published form for use by others) is an integral part of open science. By making data available to anyone lowers the cost of research, makes data mining possible, and can make scientific analyses and discover easier. Open access data publishing, therefore, is beneficial for scientists and the society including the very authors of data publication. To advance scientific progress, data publishing needs to be done responsibly. However, a recent publication by Eberhart-Phillips et al.1 (henceforth EPA) has significant shortcomings, since the article does not explain the rationale that lead to the project, it has omissions and inaccurate statements, and fails to acknowledge key contributions to their project.
    [Show full text]
  • Fujimae-Higata and Surrounding Areas: a Precious Wildlife Protection
    What are migratory Birds Observed at Fujimae-higata Shorebird flyway 0 2000 4000 Km birds? The Fujimae-higata and its surrounding area serve as a stopover for vast numbers of migratory Migratory birds are defined as birds that migrate birds on the East Asia-Australia flyway. In fact, this is one of Japan’s largest stopovers. In the Breeding site between a breeding site and a wintering site in Alaska specific seasons each year. spring of 2000, 11,000 shorebirds were recorded as using the tidal flat. In recent years, Siberia Shorebirds represent a major segment of the migra- 172 bird species (including woodland birds) have been observed in the surrounding Russia tory bird population. They can be seen mainly on area, of which 41 species were shorebirds. tidal flats and along the coastline. The birds that stop over in Japan in spring and autumn spend their During the wintering season and the spring and autumn migrations, many shorebirds China summers breeding on the tundra of Siberia and use the tidal flat and surrounding areas for feeding and resting. The bird species Japan South Korea Alaska and pass the winter in Southeast Asia and observed include dunlins, red-necked stints, grey plovers, bar-tailed godwits, Fujimae-higata Oceania. In many cases, these shorebirds migrate Stopover in flocks across great distances at a single stretch. lesser sand plovers, kentish plovers, grey-headed lapwings, common greenshanks, As a result, they must rest at stopovers in order to and grey-tailed tattlers as well as rare species such as Far Eastern curlews, Asian Taiwan regain the significant amounts of fat they require as the energy for continuing their migration.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
    University of Bath PHD Breeding System Evolution of Malagasy Plovers Natural Behaviours and Experiments Parra, Jorge Award date: 2015 Awarding institution: University of Bath Link to publication Alternative formats If you require this document in an alternative format, please contact: [email protected] General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 04. Oct. 2021 Breeding System Evolution of Malagasy Plovers Natural Behaviours and Experiments Jorge Enrique Parra Bastos A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Bath Department of Biology and Biochemistry May 2014 COPYRIGHT Attention is drawn to the fact that copyright of this thesis rests with the author. A copy of this thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that they must not copy it or use material from it except as permitted by law or with the consent of the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Publications on Waders 61
    Netherlands). France)]. Alauda 62(1): 36-37. In French. RECENT Calvo,B. 1994. Effectsof agriculturalland- Siokhin,V. & Chernichko,J. 1992. Changes PUBLICATIONS ON use on the breedingof Collaredpratincoles in the number of colonial waterbirds in the Glareolapratinco/a in south-westernSpain. Sivash area, Sea of Azov, Ukraine. In: WADERS 61 Biol.Conserv. 70: 77-83. (Zool.Dept., Finlayson,M., Hollis,T. & Davis,T. (eds.). GlasgowUniv., Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK). ManagingMediterranean wetlands and their birds:proceedings of an IWRB International Calvo,B. 1993. Influencesof agricultural Symposium,Grado, Italy, February 1991, land-use and habitat modification on the pp. 202-205. (Azov-BlackSea Ornithological compiled by breedingbiology and conservationof Collared Station,Melitopol, Ukraine). Breeding Pratincoles(Glareola pratincola) in SW communities of all Charadriiformes and Henk Koffijberg Spain. Ph.D. Thesis, UnM Glasgow. populationdynamics are described. In tryingto make these listsas Delehanty,D.J. & Oring,L.W. 1993. Effect Spaans,B. 1994. De broedvogelsvan het completeas possible,and the next of clutchsize on incubationpersistence in Volkerak-Zoommeerin de eerstevijf jaar na one even morecomplete and up to male Wilson'sPhalaropes (Pha/aropus de afsluiting.(The breedingbirds of the date, yourhelp is mostwelcome. trico/or).Auk 110(3):521-528. (Ecol.,Evol. Volkerak-Zoommeerduring the firstfive years Please send new titles, abstracts, & Conserv.Biol. Program, ERS, 1000 Valley after embankment). Limosa67(1): 15-26. In Rd., Univ. Nevada, Reno 89512, USA). Dutchwith Englishsummaryø reprints,copies, reports, and (Rijkswaterstaat,Directie Fieroland, P.O. Box (importanttoo!) omissionsor 600, 8200 AP Lelystad,Netherlands). Holland, P.K. & Yalden, D.W 1994. An correctionsto: Henk Koffijberg, Breedingbirds on formertidal flats and salt Glenn Millerweg 102, 1311 RW estimateof lifetimereproducbve success for marshes, 1988-1992, SW-Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Circus Pyg-Numenius Arq.P65 111 19/10/2004, 16:01
    Birds in Europe – Plovers Country Breeding pop. size (pairs) Year(s) Trend Mag.% References Charadrius hiaticula Belarus 150 – 250 97–00 + 10–19 COMMON RINGED PLOVER Belgium 19 – 21 00–02 0 0–19 1 Denmark 1,900 – 2,500 94–01 0 0–19 22 Non-SPECE (1994: —) Status (Secure) Faroe Is. 15 – 15 95 (0) (0–19) Criteria — Greenland 30,000 – 60,000 95–00 (0) (0–19) 11 Estonia (2,000 – 4,000) 98 – 20–29 1 European IUCN Red List Category — Finland 8,000 – 11,000 98–02 – 10 Criteria — France 100 – 130 98–02 0 0–19 4 Global IUCN Red List Category — Germany 1,000 – 1,700 95–99 – 20–29 Iceland 30,000 – 50,000 99–01 ? – 41 Criteria — Rep. Ireland 1,000 – 2,500 88–91 (0) (0–19) Latvia 60 – 80 90–00 (–) (0–19) 20,23,36 Charadrius hiaticula is a widespread breeder in northern Europe (occurring more Lithuania (30 – 50) 99–01 (0) (0–19) 20 Netherlands 430 – 470 98–00 0101 patchily further south), which probably constitutes >50% of its global breeding range. Norway (10,000 – 15,000) 90–03 (0) (0–19) Its European breeding population is large (>120,000 pairs), and was stable between Svalbard 50 – 400 90–03 (0) (0–19) Poland 350 – 400 97–00 – 20–29 47 1970–1990. Although there were declines in a few countries during 1990–2000, the Russia (13,000 – 40,000) 90–00 (F) (20–29) 28,29,60 species was stable or increased across most of its European range (the trend in Iceland Sweden 10,000 – 20,000 99–00 0 0–19 was unknown), and probably underwent only a small decline overall.
    [Show full text]