Divided by Place: the Enduring Geographical Fault Lines of American Politics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Divided by Place: the Enduring Geographical Fault Lines of American Politics Divided by Place: The Enduring Geographical Fault Lines of American Politics Brian Kal Munis Philipsburg, MT M.A. Political Science, University of Montana, 2015 B.A. Political Science, University of Montana, 2013 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Politics University of Virginia August 2020 © 2020 Brian Kal Munis ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the role of place – symbolically charged spatial units that constitute psychologically meaningful categories – in the American politics. Overall, I argue that place, perhaps the most fundamental basis of group delineation – distinguishing “us over here” from “them over there” – continues to exert considerable sway over a non-trivial portion of the American electorate, campaign advertising, and representational style. In this dissertation, I develop a rich theoretical account of the political psychological structures of place, detailing the nature of concepts such as place identity and place resentment, as well as specifying the conditions under which these psychological structures matter for politics. Political media, such as campaign advertising, activate voters’ place identities, thereby increasing the likelihood that voters use place as a heuristic to evaluate candidates and other political objects. I document and explain variation in place-based appeals in political advertising and in Congress members’ social media feeds. Place appeals are common throughout the country and exert significant effects on how voters evaluate candidates. Moreover, politicians appear to use place appeals strategically, with more vulnerable members of Congress developing a more place centered, as opposed to nationalized, representation style. Regarding voting behavior, I account for how place-based resentments correspond with support for America’s parties, President Trump, and vote choice in the 2018 midterms. In addition, I demonstrate how candidates’ place-based characteristics activate voters’ place identities. Overall, despite the forces of nationalization and partisan polarization that some assume has already resulted in a transcendence of American politics beyond the local and particular, I find that place is a potent political psychological force in contemporary American politics. Overall, the findings in this dissertation contribute to debates surrounding several important topics in political science, including partisan polarization, nationalization, the urban-rural divide, and representation. To my parents Brian and Tammy, for your unending love and support. Contents Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 That All Politics Are No Longer Local Does Not Mean That No Politics Are Local: Considering Nationalization .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Place: What is it and Why Focus on its Role in Politics? ....................................................................... 12 Resentments based in Geography: The Power of Place Beyond Roots and Place Identity .................... 15 A Preview of the Remainder of the Dissertation ..................................................................................... 17 Chapter 2. A Theory of Place in American Political Behavior ................................................................... 20 Protecting Our Public Lands vs. Protecting Our Borders: A Father/Son Quarrel in the Montana Mountains .............................................................................................................................................. 21 Place: Its Construction and Importance in Heart and Mind ............................................................ 26 Sociological Tradition ........................................................................................................................ 29 Human Geography Tradition .............................................................................................................. 29 Place and Modernity ........................................................................................................................... 31 Place and Exclusion ............................................................................................................................ 32 The Social and Political Psychology of Place ...................................................................................... 33 Place Attachment ................................................................................................................................ 36 Place Identity ...................................................................................................................................... 37 Place Consciousness and Place-based Resentment ............................................................................ 40 Figure 2.1. Subnational Place-based Psychological Constellation (Hypothetical Individuals) .. 43 General Conditions Under Which Place Becomes Politically Salient .............................................. 45 Threat .................................................................................................................................................. 46 Communication of Elites ..................................................................................................................... 48 Social Sorting ...................................................................................................................................... 49 Place, Salience, and Political Campaigns ............................................................................................ 50 Place and Advertising ......................................................................................................................... 52 Place and the Digital Homestyle ........................................................................................................ 53 Place as a Basis for both Unifying and Divisive Superordinate Identities ....................................... 53 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 56 Chapter 3. Measuring Place-based Resentment .......................................................................................... 57 What is Place Resentment .................................................................................................................... 59 Developing Survey Based Measures .................................................................................................... 66 Table 3.1 Place Resentment Scale Items ......................................................................................... 69 Validating Place Resentment ............................................................................................................... 71 Place resentment is unidimensional ..................................................................................................... 72 Place resentment is distinct .................................................................................................................. 73 Who is Resentful? ................................................................................................................................. 74 Figure 3.1 Means and Distributions of Place Resentment by Place Type .................................... 76 Table 3.2: Predictors of Place Resentment ..................................................................................... 79 Discussion and Conclusions ................................................................................................................. 82 Chapter 4: The Occurrence and Effects of Place-based Political Communications ................................... 85 Place-based Political Ads, or, Home, Home on the Range, Where the Deer and the Antelope Play on Constituent Priors ............................................................................................................................ 87 Documenting the Occurrence of Place-based Political Advertisements ............................................ 89 Table 4.1 Share of U.S. Senate Advertisements Featuring Place-based Appeals: 2010-2016 .... 92 Table 4.2 Types of Place-based Ads ................................................................................................ 93 Explaining the Occurrence of Place-based Ads.................................................................................. 95 Table 4.3 Predicting the Proportion of Place-based Ads ............................................................... 96 The Effects of Urban and Rural Place Appeals ................................................................................ 100 Figure 4.1 Example Stimuli for Each Experimental Condition .................................................. 102 Figure 4.2 Marginal Heterogenous Treatment Effects .............................................................. 103 Talk Local to Me: Place and the Digital Homestyle......................................................................... 104 Basic Patterns of Place-based Rhetoric on Congress Members’ Social Media Pages..................... 107 Figure 4.3 Place and the Digital Homestyle in the 114th and 115th Congresses ......................
Recommended publications
  • Vulnerability and Inquiring Into Relationality
    Marja-Liisa Honkasalo GUEST EDITOR’S INTRODUCTION: VULnerABILitY And INQuiring into RELAtionALitY abstract This introduction provides an analytical background for the notion of vulnerability as it is currently perceived mainly in social sciences, ethics, philosophy, queer studies and governmentality. Used both as descriptive and normative term, vulnerability, along with resilience and policy management, has acquired political dimensions, which are distant from those given by the philosophers Hannah Arendt and Emmanuel Levinas. In present day social and political discussions vulnerability has gained enormous popularity and seems to be a genuine “sticky concept”, an adhesive cluster of heterogeneous conceptual elements. Keywords: vulnerability, resilience, governmentality, intersectionality, racism, queer, vulnerable agency, sticky concept Introduction1 Vulnerability as a notion is neutral but it is applied in descriptive and normative ways. It has Vulnerability is about the porousness of bound­ multiple meanings that vary in shifting contexts. aries.2 This is the argument that runs through However, in scientific, political, and public this special issue. Nature, minds, humans, discussions, vulnerability has mostly taken on nonhumans, and the earth are open and a ‘dark’ character, as the anthropologist Sherry exposed to the environment and towards other Ortner (2016) puts it, because what is often beings, nonbeings and systems. In addition to emphasized is the openness to danger, disaster, vulnerability, other concepts like precariosity, suffering, and social control, or, with weakness fragility, risk, and resilience are also taken up or lack of agency. However, the core of the in the discussions (Butler 2009; Fineman 2008; argument in this special issue deviates from this: Sen 1982; Douglas 1966; Evans and Reid being exposed signifies a contingent possibility 3 2015; Brunila and Rossi 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Political Moments with Long-Term Consequences
    The struggle to belong Dealing with diversity in 21st century urban settings. Amsterdam, 7-9 July 2011 Political Moments with Long-term Consequences Debbie Becher Department of Sociology Barnard College, Columbia University 3009 Broadway New York, NY 10026 USA [email protected] Paper presented at the International RC21 conference 2011 Session 13.2 Strategies in Context Political Moments with Long­term Consequencesi By Debbie Becher Department of Sociology, Barnard College, Columbia University Abstract This paper is about one way that poor, urban residents claim their rights to cities. I call this specific type of organizing “political moments” to refer to intentionally temporary, grassroots organizing around small-scale, specific claims. The very characteristics that distinguish political moments as organizing – that they are small-scale and temporary – suggest that their impacts will be the same: limited and short-term. I argue that, on the contrary, through political moments, poor urban residents create enduring control over their parts of the city in ways that other forms of politics may not allow. The kind of organizing I call political moments is especially likely to mobilize people accustomed to being disengaged from politics. In this paper, I first detail the conditions that create opportunities for political moments and then the kind of organizing that comprises them. I explain how these kinds of opportunities and organizing combine powerfully to mobilize poor communities and secure short- and long-term gains. I then illustrate these arguments through the specific conflict that made me recognize them: a redevelopment plan for a poor Philadelphia neighborhood at the turn of the millennium.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Directory OKLAHOMA
    212 Congressional Directory OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA (Population 2010, 3,751,351) SENATORS JAMES M. INHOFE, Republican, of Tulsa, OK; born in Des Moines, IA, November 17, 1934; education: graduated Central High School, Tulsa, OK, 1953; B.A., University of Tulsa, OK, 1959; military service: served in the U.S. Army, private first class, 1957–58; professional: businessman; active pilot; president, Quaker Life Insurance Company; Oklahoma House of Representatives, 1967–69; Oklahoma State Senate, 1969–77; Mayor of Tulsa, OK, 1978–84; religion: member, First Presbyterian Church of Tulsa; married: Kay Kirkpatrick; children: Jim, Perry, Molly, and Katy; twelve grandchildren; committees: ranking member, Armed Services; Environment and Public Works; elected to the 100th Congress on November 4, 1986; reelected to each succeeding Congress; elected to the U.S. Senate on November 8, 1994, finishing the unexpired term of Senator David Boren; reelected to each succeeding Senate term. Office Listings http://inhofe.senate.gov 205 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 .................................... (202) 224–4721 Chief of Staff.—Ryan Jackson. FAX: 228–0380 Legislative Director.—Clark Peterson. Press Secretary.—Jared Young. Scheduler.—Wendi Price. 1924 South Utica, Suite 530, Tulsa, OK 74104–6511 ................................................ (918) 748–5111 1900 Northwest Expressway, Suite 1210, Oklahoma City, OK 73118 ...................... (405) 608–4381 302 North Independence, Suite 104, Enid, OK 73701 ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Jim Bridenstine (R) Rep
    District Background: Oklahoma - 1 Rep. Jim Bridenstine (R) Relevant committees: None Bike Caucus member: TBA Member Profile Past Support » Co-sponsored the 2011 Complete Streets bill (HR 1780) No » Signed letter to Transportation Secretary supporting non-motorized No safety performance measure Current Bills » Co-sponsor of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Act (HR 3494) No » Co-sponsor of the Safe Streets Act (HR 2468) No » Co-sponsor of the New Opportunities for Bicycle and Pedestrian No Infrastructure Financing Act (HR 3978) District Profile Population Centers Tusla, Broken Arrow, Bartlesville Bicycling Means Business: District Level for 2012 Bicycle Retail Stores in District: 53 Bicycle Retail Jobs: 244 Annual Gross Revenue: $18,770,000 State Profile State Complete Streets Policy? No 8.9% Percentage of state roadway fatalities that are bicyclists and pedestrians 0.0% Percent of Highway Safety Improvement Program funding spent on bicycle and pedestrian projects District Background: Oklahoma - 2 Rep. Markwayne Mullin (R) Relevant committees: Transportation & Infrastructure Bike Caucus member: TBA Member Profile Past Support » Co-sponsored the 2011 Complete Streets bill (HR 1780) No » Signed letter to Transportation Secretary supporting non-motorized No safety performance measure Current Bills » Co-sponsor of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Act (HR 3494) No » Co-sponsor of the Safe Streets Act (HR 2468) No » Co-sponsor of the New Opportunities for Bicycle and Pedestrian No Infrastructure Financing Act (HR 3978) District Profile Population Centers Muskogee, McAlester, Claremore Bicycling Means Business: District Level for 2012 Bicycle Retail Stores in District: 29 Bicycle Retail Jobs: 122 Annual Gross Revenue: $590,000 State Profile State Complete Streets Policy? No 8.9% Percentage of state roadway fatalities that are bicyclists and pedestrians 0.0% Percent of Highway Safety Improvement Program funding spent on bicycle and pedestrian projects District Background: Oklahoma - 3 Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Contract, Social Policy and Social Capital
    THE PAST AND FUTURE: SOCIAL CONTRACT, SOCIAL POLICY AND SOCIAL CAPITAL Cornelia Butler Flora Jan L. Flora Iowa State University Social Contract Early social theorists (Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau) were intrigued by the notion of order and the mutual obligation it entails. For them, a critical part of social order is the relation between the ruler and the ruled, which includes collective agreement on the criteria for distinguishing right behavior from wrong, and enforcing right action. Why do the vast majority of people do what they are supposed to do? Hobbes addressed the question by theorizing what he felt separated "civilized" society from savagery. The "state of nature," according to Hobbes, was based on each person gaining the most possible on an individual basis, resulting in a life that was "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short." Only when individuals, through a social contract, give up their individual liberty to a sovereign committed to defending the subjects' lives in exchange for obedience to the sovereign's rules, does order, and thus security, emerge. The Hobbesian argument justifies the power of the sovereign. If citizens do not obey the rules, harsh and even extreme punishment isj ustifiable, indeed, necessary. Locke differed from Hobbes in his view of history. He argued that the rights of life and property were recognized under natural law. Insecurity arose from lack of clarity as to who was to enforce those rights. The social contract involves individuals agreeing to obey the laws of the state in exchange for the state's protection of the person and property.
    [Show full text]
  • 114Th Congress 215
    OKLAHOMA 114th Congress 215 OKLAHOMA (Population 2010, 3,751,351) SENATORS JAMES M. INHOFE, Republican, of Tulsa, OK; born in Des Moines, IA, November 17, 1934; education: graduated, Central High School, Tulsa, OK, 1953; B.A., University of Tulsa, OK, 1959; military service: served in the U.S. Army, private first class, 1957–58; professional: businessman; active pilot; president, Quaker Life Insurance Company; Oklahoma House of Representatives, 1967–69; Oklahoma State Senate, 1969–77; Mayor of Tulsa, OK, 1978–84; religion: member, First Presbyterian Church of Tulsa; married: Kay Kirkpatrick; children: Jim, Perry, Molly, and Katy; twelve grandchildren; committees: chair, Environment and Public Works; Armed Services; elected to the 100th Congress on November 4, 1986; reelected to each succeeding Congress; elected to the U.S. Senate on November 8, 1994, finishing the unexpired term of Senator David Boren; reelected to each succeeding Senate term. Office Listings http://inhofe.senate.gov 205 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 .................................................. (202) 224–4721 Chief of Staff.—Ryan Jackson. FAX: 228–0380 Legislative Director.—Luke Holland. Communications Director.—Donelle Harder. Scheduler.—Wendi Price. 1924 South Utica, Suite 530, Tulsa, OK 74104–6511 .............................................................. (918) 748–5111 1900 Northwest Expressway, Suite 1210, Oklahoma City, OK 73118 .................................... (405) 608–4381 302 North Independence, Suite 104, Enid, OK 73701 .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Aid: African Strategies for Dealing with Donors
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Fraser, Alastair; Whitfield, Lindsay Working Paper The politics of aid: African strategies for dealing with donors GEG Working Paper, No. 2008/42 Provided in Cooperation with: University of Oxford, Global Economic Governance Programme (GEG) Suggested Citation: Fraser, Alastair; Whitfield, Lindsay (2008) : The politics of aid: African strategies for dealing with donors, GEG Working Paper, No. 2008/42, University of Oxford, Global Economic Governance Programme (GEG), Oxford This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/196304 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu • GLOBAL ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE PROGRAMME • Alastair Fraser Alastair Fraser researches the relationship between Africa and the West.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Capital in First Nations Communities / 125 6 Social Capital in First Nations Communities: Concept and Measurement
    Social Capital in First Nations Communities / 125 6 Social Capital in First Nations Communities: Concept and Measurement Javier Mignone, Janet Longclaws, John O’Neil and Cameron Mustard Introduction Social epidemiology is motivated by the question “Why is this society unhealthy?” versus the traditional epidemiological question “Why did this individual get sick?”1 These are two kinds of etiological questions. The latter question seeks the causes of cases, whereas the former seeks the causes of prevalence and incidence, and thus requires the study of population features—not so much the characteristics of individuals.2 Compositional explanations for variations in health between different communities assume that these areas include different types of individuals, and differences between these individuals would account for the observed difference between places. On the other hand, a contextual explanation would consider that there are features of the social or physical environment that influence the health of those exposed to it (either in addition to or in interaction with individual characteristics). This derives in the key distinction between individual level determinants and ecological level determinants of health. The critical view held by the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (RCAP) on the individualistic analysis of socioeconomic determinants of health is aligned with this contextual explanation (Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1996a). It was with this perspective that the Health Information and Research Committee (HIR) of the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs (AMC), together with the Centre for Aboriginal Health Research (CAHR) at the University of Manitoba, outlined a strategic program of research entitled “Why Are Some First Nations Communities Healthy and Others Are Not? Constituting Evidence in First Nations Health Policy” (O’Neil et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy Index 2010 Democracy in Retreat a Report from the Economist Intelligence Unit
    Democracy index 2010 Democracy in retreat A report from the Economist Intelligence Unit www.eiu.com Democracy index 2010 Democracy in retreat The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Index of Democracy 2010 Democracy in retreat This is the third edition of the Economist Intelligence Unit’s democracy index. It reflects the situation as of November 2010. The first edition, published in The Economist’sThe World in 2007, measured the state of democracy in September 2006 and the second edition covered the situation towards the end of 2008. The index provides a snapshot of the state of democracy worldwide for 165 independent states and two territories—this covers almost the entire population of the world and the vast majority of the world’s independent states (micro states are excluded). The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Index of Democracy is based on five categories: electoral process and pluralism; civil liberties; the functioning of government; political participation; and political culture. Countries are placed within one of four types of regimes: full democracies; flawed democracies; hybrid regimes; and authoritarian regimes. Free and fair elections and civil liberties are necessary conditions for democracy, but they are unlikely to be sufficient for a full and consolidated democracy if unaccompanied by transparent and at least minimally efficient government, sufficient political participation and a supportive democratic political culture. It is not easy to build a sturdy democracy. Even in long-established ones, if not nurtured and protected, democracy can corrode. Democracy in decline The global record in democratisation since the start of its so-called third wave in 1974, and acceleration after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, has been impressive.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparation of Papers for AIAA Journals
    Analysis of Satellite Radio Occultation Architecture and its Stakeholders I. Josue Tapia-Tamayo1 and Paul T. Grogan2 Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA Global Navigation Satellite System Radio Occultation (GNSS-RO) is a technique that relies on the change of a signal transmitted from a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) as it passes through the planet’s atmosphere. This technique is not only suitable to study weather forecasting or climate change, but also offers a low-cost application. This report aims to characterize and parametrize the system architecture of commercial companies pursuing the Commercial Weather Data Pilot (CWDP) contract by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The approach of the paper will start by explaining the Radio Occultation technique and its potential application to Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP). The paper then identifies the main stakeholders of radio occultation and NWP, and their needs. Some key functional requirements are pinpointed, and the challenges that some of these architectures must overcome is discussed. Introduction The increase of severe weather in the last decade has led to the need for improvement of U.S. weather forecasting. Severe weather such as hurricanes and flooding causes great economic damage to cities. According to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the cost of economic damage caused by hurricanes was $161 billion for Katrina in 2005, $71 billion for Sandy in 2012, $125 billion for Harvey in 2017, $90 billion for Maria in 2017, and $50 billion for Irma in 2017. The overall cost of hurricanes in the U.S. reached $515.4 billion in insured property losses from 1986 to 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Communities
    Developing 1 Communities Jerry W. Robinson, Jr., and Gary Paul Green BEHAVIOR OBJECTIVES After studying this chapter and completing the online learning activities, students should be able to 1. Understand the criticism of the concept of “community.” 2. Define community of place. 3. Differentiate between community development and economic development. 4. Describe the social forces that led to the rise of the community development field. 5. Differentiate between development “of” community and development “in” community. 6. Identify issues that influence the interests of residents in specific localities. 7. Understand the role of participation in the community development process. 8. Distinguish between community service-learning and volunteering/community service. ________________________________________ Introduction Much has been written in recent years about the loss of community and the implications for civil society (Putnam, 2000). Globalization has restructured economic, political, and social relationships at the local level. Technological and social changes have opened new paths for sharing collective interests, such as social networking sites on the Internet and mass media that link individuals to a common culture. Corporations and financial institutions shift capital around the globe to seek out more profitable locations for doing business. Workers increasingly move to places where they can find better job opportu - nities. All of these factors undermine the sense of community in places. 1 2 INTRODUCTION TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Although our social relationships and interests are no longer limited to local communities, the power of place remains. Local issues, such as education, housing, health, and jobs, are critical concerns for most residents. There continues to be interest in mobilizing local residents to build assets that improve their quality of life (Green & Haines, 2007; Kretzmann & McKnight, 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Community Resilience: a Policy Tool for Local Government?
    This is a repository copy of Community resilience: a policy tool for local government?. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/108066/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Platts-Fowler, D. and Robinson, D. (2016) Community resilience: a policy tool for local government? Local Government Studies, 42 (5). pp. 762-784. ISSN 0300-3930 https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2016.1186653 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Community Resilience: A Policy Tool for Local Government? Published: Local Government Studies Deborah Platts-Fowler Department of Law and Criminology Sheffield Hallam University Sheffield S1 1WB [email protected] David Robinson (Corresponding Author) Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research Sheffield Hallam University Sheffield S1 1WB [email protected] Community Resilience: A Policy Tool for Local Government? Abstract In many countries local government has been a prime target of austerity measures.
    [Show full text]