DOCSLIB.ORG

ISSAP Taiga Bean Goose

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AGREEMENT ON THE CONSERVATION OF Doc AEWA/EGM IWG Inf. 1.6 10 November 2016 AFRICAN-EURASIAN MIGRATORY WATERBIRDS 1st MEETING OF THE AEWA EUROPEAN GOOSE MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL WORKING GROUP 14 – 16 December 2016, Kristianstad, Sweden AEWA INTERNATIONAL SINGLE SPECIES ACTION PLAN FOR THE CONSERVATION OF THE TAIGA BEAN GOOSE (Anser fabalis fabalis) ___________________________________________________________________________________________ The 1st Meeting of the AEWA European Goose Management International Working Group is being hosted by the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. TECHNICAL SERIES No. 56 International Single Species Action Plan for the Conservation of the Taiga Bean Goose Anser fabalis fabalis Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds (AEWA) International Single Species Action Plan for the Conservation of the Taiga Bean Goose Anser fabalis fabalis AEWA Technical Series No. 56 November 2015 Produced by and printed with financial support from The Finnish Wildlife Agency Prepared with financial support from The Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Compiled by: Arto Marjakangas1, Mikko Alhainen1, Anthony D. Fox2, Thomas Heinicke3, Jesper Madsen2, Leif Nilsson4 & Sonia Rozenfeld5 1Finnish Wildlife Agency, Finland, [email protected], [email protected] 2Aarhus University, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus, Denmark, [email protected], [email protected] 3International Bean Goose Project, Germany, [email protected] 4Lund University, Department of Biology, Sweden, [email protected] 5A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, the Russian Federation, [email protected] With contributions from: Tomas Aarvak, Sami Aikio, Vladimir V. Belinskij, Vilnis Bernards, Thomas Kjær Christensen, Preben Clausen, Alexandre Czajkowski, Adriaan de Jong, Sergey Dereliev, Volodymyr Domashlinets, Arild Espelien, Gleb Gavris, Alexander Griffin, Morten Günther, Pekka Helle, Fred A. Johnson, Risto Karvonen, Georgiy Kirtaev, Kees Koffijberg, Rolf Kolstrøm, Christian Krogell, Teemu Lehtiniemi, Aivar Leito, Monika Lesz, Mārtiņš Līdums, Niklas Liljebäck, Tapio Lindholm, Ûrij Logvinov, Nina Mikander, Brian Minshull, Carl Mitchell, Johan Mooij, Vladimir Morozov, Mikhail Novikov, Jarkko Nurmi, Ingar J. Øien, Ivar Ojaste, Reijo Orava, Matti Osara, Jan Eivind Østnes, Antti Paasivaara, Kseniya Panteley, Stefan Pihl, Pavel Pinchuk, Üllar Rammul, Simon Rix, Mark Ryan, David Schönberg-Alm, Oleg Shevchenko, Viktor Slodkevitch, Evgenij Strelnikov, David Stroud, Saulius Švažas, Ole Therkildsen, Veli-Matti Väänänen, Isak Vahlström, Einari Väyrynen, Alexey Vaysman, the late Jānis Vīksne, Vladimir Yakovlev, Dmitry Zamâtin Milestones in the production of the plan: Stakeholder workshop: 12-14 November 2013, Tuusula, Finland First draft: Presented to the participants of the stakeholder workshop in May 2014 Second draft: Presented to the range states and the European Commission in November 2014 and subsequently to the 12th Meeting of the AEWA Technical Committee, 3-6 March 2015, Bonn, Germany Third draft: Presented to the 10th Meeting of the AEWA Standing Committee, 8-10 July 2015, Kampala, Uganda and approved for submission to the 6th Session of the Meeting of the Parties to AEWA (MOP6) Final draft: Adopted by MOP6, 9-14 November 2015, Bonn, Germany. Geographical scope This International Single Species Action Plan applies to and shall be implemented in the following countries: Belarus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, the Russian Federation, Sweden, Ukraine and the United Kingdom. Reviews This International Single Species Action Plan should be reviewed and updated every 10 years (first revision in 2025). Recommended citation Marjakangas, A., Alhainen, M., Fox, A.D., Heinicke, T., Madsen, J., Nilsson, L. & Rozenfeld, S. (Compilers) 2015. International Single Species Action Plan for the Conservation of the Taiga Bean Goose (Anser fabalis fabalis). AEWA Technical Series No. 56. Bonn, Germany. Picture on the front cover Taiga Bean Goose (Anser fabalis fabalis) © Markus Varesvuo (www.birdphoto.fi) Note on transliteration The transliteration of Russian Cyrillic characters follows the ISO 9:1995 standard, except for geographical names with established English spelling conventions. Disclaimer The designations employed and the presentation of the material in the document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP/AEWA concerning the legal status of any State, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of their frontiers and boundaries. AEWA Technical Series No. 56 Contents Preface .....................................................................................................................................................5 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................6 1. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................9 2. Biological Assessment .......................................................................................................................11 2.1 General Information ....................................................................................................................11 2.2 Taxonomy and Biogeography .....................................................................................................11 2.2.1 Biogeographic populations of Bean Goose .........................................................................11 2.2.2 Sub-populations/flyway management units of Taiga Bean Goose. ....................................11 2.3 Distribution throughout the Annual Cycle ..................................................................................13 2.3.1 Western sub-population/management unit...... ....................................................................13 2.3.1 Central sub-population/management unit ..........................................................................14 2.3.3 Eastern 1 sub-population/management unit ........................................................................15 2.3.4 Eastern 2 sub-population/management unit ........................................................................15 2.4 Habitat Use ..................................................................................................................................15 2.4.1 Breeding season ..................................................................................................................15 2.4.2 Non-breeding season ...........................................................................................................16 2.5 Population Dynamics and Status .................................................................................................16 2.5.1 Productivity .........................................................................................................................16 2.5.2 Survival ...............................................................................................................................18 2.5.3 Population size and trend ...................................................................................................19 3. Threats ................................................................................................................................................22 3.1 General Overview .......................................................................................................................22 3.2 Hunting. .......................................................................................................................................24 3.3 Illegal Harvest. ............................................................................................................................27 3.4 Human Disturbance .....................................................................................................................27 3.5 Forestry .......................................................................................................................................28 3.6 Predation. ....................................................................................................................................28 3.7 Infrastructure Development. ........................................................................................................29 3.8 Other Threats ...............................................................................................................................29 4. Knowledge Gaps and Research Needs ...............................................................................................31 5. Policies and Legislation Relevant for Management ...........................................................................33 5.1 Global Conservation Status .........................................................................................................33 5.2 International Conventions, Agreements and Legislation ............................................................33 5.2.1 Convention on the Conservation of Wildlife and Natural Habitats (Bern Convention) .....33 5.2.2 Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) ..............33 International Single Species Action Plan for the Conservation of the Taiga Bean Goose
Recommended publications
  • Wild Species 2010 the GENERAL STATUS of SPECIES in CANADA

    Wild Species 2010 the GENERAL STATUS of SPECIES in CANADA

    Wild Species 2010 THE GENERAL STATUS OF SPECIES IN CANADA Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council National General Status Working Group This report is a product from the collaboration of all provincial and territorial governments in Canada, and of the federal government. Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council (CESCC). 2011. Wild Species 2010: The General Status of Species in Canada. National General Status Working Group: 302 pp. Available in French under title: Espèces sauvages 2010: La situation générale des espèces au Canada. ii Abstract Wild Species 2010 is the third report of the series after 2000 and 2005. The aim of the Wild Species series is to provide an overview on which species occur in Canada, in which provinces, territories or ocean regions they occur, and what is their status. Each species assessed in this report received a rank among the following categories: Extinct (0.2), Extirpated (0.1), At Risk (1), May Be At Risk (2), Sensitive (3), Secure (4), Undetermined (5), Not Assessed (6), Exotic (7) or Accidental (8). In the 2010 report, 11 950 species were assessed. Many taxonomic groups that were first assessed in the previous Wild Species reports were reassessed, such as vascular plants, freshwater mussels, odonates, butterflies, crayfishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals. Other taxonomic groups are assessed for the first time in the Wild Species 2010 report, namely lichens, mosses, spiders, predaceous diving beetles, ground beetles (including the reassessment of tiger beetles), lady beetles, bumblebees, black flies, horse flies, mosquitoes, and some selected macromoths. The overall results of this report show that the majority of Canada’s wild species are ranked Secure.
  • Genetic Structure of Taiga Bean Goose in Central Scandinavia

    Genetic Structure of Taiga Bean Goose in Central Scandinavia

    Bird Conservation International, page 1 of 14. © BirdLife International, 2018 doi:10.1017/S0959270918000205 Birds of different feather flock together - genetic structure of Taiga Bean Goose in Central Scandinavia ADRIAAN DE JONG, ODDMUND KLEVEN, JAN EIVIND ØSTNES, ROLF TERJE KROGLUND, ISAK VAHLSTRÖM, JAN NILSSON and GÖRAN SPONG Summary During their flightless summer moult, Taiga Bean Geese Anser fabalis fabalis gather at commu- nal moulting sites. Individuals from the Nord-Trøndelag breeding area in Norway have been observed to join with local individuals on moulting sites in Vilhelmina Municipality, Sweden. These two groups show distinct features in breeding habitat and migratory behaviour, but are they also genetically distinct? We used 12 microsatellite loci for genotyping 109 blood, feather and faecal samples from three sampling areas (Røyrvik in Norway and Stalon and Nästansjö in Sweden) to examine genetic diversity and structure. Clustering and Principal Coordinate analyses of all samples unveiled at least two distinct clusters, which were unevenly distributed over the sampling sites. Grouped by sampling sites, AMOVA and FST analyses showed that samples from the three sites differed genetically. These differences were larger between Røyrvik and Nästansjö than between Stalon and the other two. Relatedness was high among the Røyrvik samples. From our results we conclude that one of the clusters describes the Røyrvik breeding subpopulation, while the other(s) breed mainly in Sweden. Although these subpopulations simultaneously use the same moulting area in Vilhelmina, they appear to be ecologically, behaviourally and genetically distinct, in particular the Røyrvik sub-population. For goose conservation and management, we suggest that the Nord-Trøndelag (Røyrvik) subpopulation is considered a separate flyway man- agement unit.
  • From Wild Forest Reindeer to Biodiversity Studies and Environmental Education” 5Th to 6Th October, 2010 in Kuhmo, Eastern Finland

    From Wild Forest Reindeer to Biodiversity Studies and Environmental Education” 5Th to 6Th October, 2010 in Kuhmo, Eastern Finland

    YMPÄRISTÖN- SUOJELU The Finnish-Russian Friendship Nature Reserve was established in 1990 to promote and en- hance cooperation in nature conservation and conservation research. In the beginning, the main From wild forest reindeer to biodiversity emphasis was on joint research between Finland and the Soviet Union. Over the years, the co- studies and environmental education operation has expanded to include many universities and research institutes worldwide. The year 2010 marked the 20-year anniversary of the Friendship Nature Reserve. To celebrate this important year, the Finnish Environment Institute, Metsähallitus Natural Heritage Services Abstracts of the 20 years anniversary symposium of and the Kostomuksha Strict Nature Reserve (Zapovednik) arranged jointly an Anniversary Sym- the Finnish - Russian Nature Reserve Friendship posium “From Wild Forest Reindeer to Biodiversity Studies and Environmental Education” 5th to 6th October, 2010 in Kuhmo, eastern Finland. Parallel to the symposium, the 4th European Green Belt Conference was arranged in Kuhmo by Metsähallitus Natural Heritage Services. Around Outi Isokääntä and Jari Heikkilä (eds.) 150 people from 19 different countries participated the symposium. ISBN 978-952-11-3845-4 (PDF) Suomen ympäristökeskus From wild forest reindeer to biodiversity studies and environmental education Abstracts of the 20 years anniversary symposium of the Finnish - Russian Nature Reserve Friendship Outi Isokääntä and Jari Heikkilä (eds.) Helsinki 2011 FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE Layout: Pirjo Appelgrén Cover photo: Ari Meriruoko The publication is availble only in the internet www.environment.fi/syke/fnr20 ISBN 978-952-11-3845-4 (PDF) FOREWORD Jari Heikkilä Finnish Environment Institute Friendship Park Research Centre [email protected] Over the past 20 years the Finnish-Russian Friendship Nature Reserve has been in- volved in opening the border between the East and the West for nature conservation and research.
  • Three Species of Siberian Geese Seen in Nebraska Rick Wright Nebraska Ornithologists' Union

    Three Species of Siberian Geese Seen in Nebraska Rick Wright Nebraska Ornithologists' Union

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Bird Review Nebraska Ornithologists' Union 3-1985 Three Species of Siberian Geese Seen in Nebraska Rick Wright Nebraska Ornithologists' Union Alan Grenon Nebraska Ornithologists' Union Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebbirdrev Part of the Ornithology Commons, Poultry or Avian Science Commons, and the Zoology Commons Wright, Rick and Grenon, Alan, "Three Species of Siberian Geese Seen in Nebraska" (1985). Nebraska Bird Review. 937. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebbirdrev/937 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nebraska Ornithologists' Union at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Bird Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Wright, Grenon & Rose, "Three Species of Siberian Geese Seen in Nebraska," from Nebraska Bird Review (March 1985) 53(1). Copyright 1985, Nebraska Ornithologists' Union. Used by permission. Nebraska Bird Review 3 THREE SPECIES OF' SIBERIAN GEESE SEEN IN NEBRASKA At about 3:00 PM on 29 December 1984, whi~e participating in the DeSoto NWR Christmas Count, Betty Grenon, David Starr, and the authors, Rick Wright and AIan Grenon, flushed from near the west shore of the DeSoto Cut-off (Washington Co., Nebraska) a party of seven Greater White-fronted Geese. With these seven geese was one distinctly larger, which drew our attention as the small flock flew above us for about five minutes. The larger bird displayed obvious damage to or loss of primaries on each wing, making it easier for the four of us to concentrate our observations on it and compare our impressions.
  • Recent Introgression Between Taiga Bean Goose and Tundra Bean Goose Results in a Largely Homogeneous Landscape of Genetic Differentiation

    Recent Introgression Between Taiga Bean Goose and Tundra Bean Goose Results in a Largely Homogeneous Landscape of Genetic Differentiation

    Heredity (2020) 125:73–84 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-020-0322-z ARTICLE Recent introgression between Taiga Bean Goose and Tundra Bean Goose results in a largely homogeneous landscape of genetic differentiation 1 2 3 1 Jente Ottenburghs ● Johanna Honka ● Gerard J. D. M. Müskens ● Hans Ellegren Received: 12 December 2019 / Revised: 11 May 2020 / Accepted: 12 May 2020 / Published online: 26 May 2020 © The Author(s) 2020. This article is published with open access Abstract Several studies have uncovered a highly heterogeneous landscape of genetic differentiation across the genomes of closely related species. Specifically, genetic differentiation is often concentrated in particular genomic regions (“islands of differentiation”) that might contain barrier loci contributing to reproductive isolation, whereas the rest of the genome is homogenized by introgression. Alternatively, linked selection can produce differentiation islands in allopatry without introgression. We explored the influence of introgression on the landscape of genetic differentiation in two hybridizing goose taxa: the Taiga Bean Goose (Anser fabalis) and the Tundra Bean Goose (A. serrirostris). We re-sequenced the whole 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: genomes of 18 individuals (9 of each taxon) and, using a combination of population genomic summary statistics and demographic modeling, we reconstructed the evolutionary history of these birds. Next, we quantified the impact of introgression on the build-up and maintenance of genetic differentiation. We found evidence for a scenario of allopatric divergence (about 2.5 million years ago) followed by recent secondary contact (about 60,000 years ago). Subsequent introgression events led to high levels of gene flow, mainly from the Tundra Bean Goose into the Taiga Bean Goose.
  • In the Lands of the Romanovs: an Annotated Bibliography of First-Hand English-Language Accounts of the Russian Empire

    In the Lands of the Romanovs: an Annotated Bibliography of First-Hand English-Language Accounts of the Russian Empire

    ANTHONY CROSS In the Lands of the Romanovs An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of The Russian Empire (1613-1917) OpenBook Publishers To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/268 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. In the Lands of the Romanovs An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of the Russian Empire (1613-1917) Anthony Cross http://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2014 Anthony Cross The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the text; to adapt it and to make commercial use of it providing that attribution is made to the author (but not in any way that suggests that he endorses you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Cross, Anthony, In the Land of the Romanovs: An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of the Russian Empire (1613-1917), Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.11647/ OBP.0042 Please see the list of illustrations for attribution relating to individual images. Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omissions or errors will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher. As for the rights of the images from Wikimedia Commons, please refer to the Wikimedia website (for each image, the link to the relevant page can be found in the list of illustrations).
  • 4 East Dongting Lake P3-19

    4 East Dongting Lake P3-19

    3 The functional use of East Dongting Lake, China, by wintering geese ANTHONY D. FOX1, CAO LEI2*, MARK BARTER3, EILEEN C. REES4, RICHARD D. HEARN4, CONG PEI HAO2, WANG XIN2, ZHANG YONG2, DOU SONG TAO2 & SHAO XU FANG2 1Department of Wildlife Ecology and Biodiversity, National Environmental Research Institute, University of Aarhus, Kalø, Grenåvej 14, DK-8410 Rønde, Denmark. 2School of Life Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, PR China. 321 Chivalry Avenue, Glen Waverley, Victoria 3150, Australia. 4Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust, Slimbridge, Gloucestershire GL2 7BT, UK. *Correspondence author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract A survey and study of geese wintering at the East Dongting Lake National Nature Reserve, China, in February 2008 revealed internationally important numbers of Lesser White-fronted Geese Anser erythropus, Greater White-fronted Geese Anser albifrons and Bean Geese Anser fabilis using the site, as well as small numbers of Greylag Geese Anser anser. Only five Swan Geese Anser cygnoides were recorded, compared with several hundreds in the 1990s. Globally important numbers of Lesser White-fronted Geese spend the majority of daylight hours feeding on short grassland and sedge meadows within the core reserve areas of the National Nature Reserve, and also roost there at night. Greater White-fronted Geese were not studied in detail, but showed similar behaviour. Large numbers of Bean Geese of both serrirostris and middendorffi races showed differing feeding strategies. The small numbers of serrirostris tended to roost and feed in or near the reserve on short grassland, as did small proportions of middendorffi. However, the majority of middendorffi slept within the confines of the reserve by day and flew out at dusk, to nocturnal feeding areas at least 40 km north on the far side of the Yangtze River, returning 40–80 min after first light.
  • S. I. Kochkurkina ANCIENT OLONETS

    S. I. Kochkurkina ANCIENT OLONETS

    Fe1/llQscandia archaeowgicaX (1993) S. I. Kochkurkina ANCIENT OLONETS Abstract The Olonets Isthmus was colonized by man around 6,000 years ago. Stone Age and Early Metal Period dwelling-sites have survived from the earliest stages of settlement. Between the 10th and 13th centuries A.D. cemeteries with small burial mounds were established in the areas of the Olonka, Tuloksa, and Vidlitsa Rivers by the ancestors of the Livvik Kare­ lians and the Vepsians. The earliest written references to Olonets are in the Ustavnaya Gra­ mota of Svyatoslav Olgovich and in annalistic codes of the 13th century. Cadastre books of the 16th century contain a wealth of material on the history of Olonets. The strategic im­ portance of Olonets grew after the Treaty of Stolbovo (pi. Stolbova) in 1617, which was highly disadvantageous to Russian interests. In 1648-1649 timber and earthen fortifications were built at Olonets, and it evolved into the largest defensive and administrative centre of the Zaonezhye region. Together with documentary sources, archaeological excavations (conducted in 1973-75, 1988, 1990, and 1991) provide material for a study of how the tim­ bered town of Olonets and the courtyard of the fortress were built. They also reveal the fac­ tual contents of documentary sources, and describe material culture, which is not accessible through written sources. S.l. Kochkurkina, Karelian Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Language, Literature and History, Pushkinskaya 11, 185610 Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia, Russian Federation. The Olonets Isthmus was colonized by man Between the 10th and 13th centuries AD., cem­ around 6,000 years ago.
  • Laura Stark Peasants, Pilgrims, and Sacred Promises Ritual and the Supernatural in Orthodox Karelian Folk Religion

    Laura Stark Peasants, Pilgrims, and Sacred Promises Ritual and the Supernatural in Orthodox Karelian Folk Religion

    laura stark Peasants, Pilgrims, and Sacred Promises Ritual and the Supernatural in Orthodox Karelian Folk Religion Studia Fennica Folkloristica The Finnish Literature Society (SKS) was founded in 1831 and has, from the very beginning, engaged in publishing operations. It nowadays publishes literature in the fields of ethnology and folkloristics, linguistics, literary research and cultural history. The first volume of the Studia Fennica series appeared in 1933. Since 1992, the series has been divided into three thematic subseries: Ethnologica, Folkloristica and Linguistica. Two additional subseries were formed in 2002, Historica and Litteraria. The subseries Anthropologica was formed in 2007. In addition to its publishing activities, the Finnish Literature Society maintains research activities and infrastructures, an archive containing folklore and literary collections, a research library and promotes Finnish literature abroad. Studia fennica editorial board Anna-Leena Siikala Rauno Endén Teppo Korhonen Pentti Leino Auli Viikari Kristiina Näyhö Editorial Office SKS P.O. Box 259 FI-00171 Helsinki www.finlit.fi Laura Stark Peasants, Pilgrims, and Sacred Promises Ritual and the Supernatural in Orthodox Karelian Folk Religion Finnish Literature Society • Helsinki 3 Studia Fennica Folkloristica 11 The publication has undergone a peer review. The open access publication of this volume has received part funding via Helsinki University Library. © 2002 Laura Stark and SKS License CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International. A digital edition of a printed book first published in 2002 by the Finnish Literature Society. Cover Design: Timo Numminen EPUB: eLibris Media Oy ISBN 978-951-746-366-9 (Print) ISBN 978-951-746-578-6 (PDF) ISBN 978-952-222-766-9 (EPUB) ISSN 0085-6835 (Studia Fennica) ISSN 1235-1946 (Studia Fennica Folkloristica) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21435/sff.11 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.
  • Newsletter Sept15

    Newsletter Sept15

    Swedish -Karelian Business and Information Center SKBIC NEWSLETTER September 2015 Coming up: • 8th International Bar- ents Region Habitat Forum of municipalities: Karelia - Contact Forum. Petrozavodsk, Sep- Västerbotten tember 28—October 2, 2015. Arranging match-making forums for the twinning municipalities has become a good tradition in Karelia - Västerbotten cooperation. The previous conference took place in • III International Fo- 2011, now after four years partners would like to gather again and meet new people, rum for Energy Effi- learn about latest developments and simply collect personal opinions and experi- ciency, Environment ences. The forum to take place in Petrozavodsk on November 12-13. Swedish mu- and Communal Infra- nicipalities of Umeå, Malå, Vindeln, Lycksele and Robertsfors are invitied to meet structure. Petro- zavodsk, October 28 their counterparts from Petrozavodsk, Medvezhyegorsk, Pryazha, Olonets and Kosto- -30. muksha. Energy Efficiency at Hospitals - the project is continued SKBIC continues implementation of the project "Energy Efficiency at hospitals". In January 2015 expert from Umeå Kjell Blombäck, representing the Swedish company Ramboll, met with officials of Karelian Health Care Ministry and work- ers of Children's Republican Hospital to discuss a set of specific technical meas- ures aimed at reducing electricity, hot water consumption and heat losses in the hospital building. In June 2015 Mr. Blombäck returned to present to the Ministry the technical so- lutions, allowing to reduce energy con- sumption and heat loss in the building of the Children's Republican Hospital. The draft plan was discussed and to be finalized in autumn 2015. Discus sing the plan of upcoming activities at SKBIC office Green Economy project finalized Supported by the Nordic Council of Ministers “Green Economy” project was initially planned for implemen- tation until autumn 2015.
  • The Mystery of Anser Neglectus Sushkin, 1897. Victim of the Tunguska Disaster? a Hungarian Story

    The Mystery of Anser Neglectus Sushkin, 1897. Victim of the Tunguska Disaster? a Hungarian Story

    Ornis Hungarica 2019. 27(2): 20–58. DOI: 10.2478/orhu-2019-0014 The mystery of Anser neglectus Sushkin, 1897. Victim of the Tunguska disaster? A Hungarian story Jacques VAN IMPE Received: April 08, 2019 – Revised: August 10, 2019 – Accepted: October 31, 2019 Van Impe, J. 2019. The mystery of Anser neglectus Sushkin, 1897. Victim of the Tunguska dis- aster? A Hungarian story. – Ornis Hungarica 27(2): 20–58. DOI: 10.2478/orhu-2019-0014 Abstract The well-known Russian ornithologist Prof. Peter Sushkin described it as a distinct species from Bashkortostan (Bashkiria) in 1897, a highly acclaimed discovery. However, its breeding grounds never been discovered. Since then, there has been a long-standing debate over the taxonom- ic position of Anser neglectus. Taxonomists have argued that Anser neglectus belongs to the group of A. fabalis Lath. because of its close resemblance with A. f. fabalis. At the beginning of the 20th century, large numbers of the Sushkin’s goose were observed in three winter quar- ters: on two lakes in the Republic of Bachkortostan, in the surroundings of the town of Tashkent in the Republic Uzbekistan, and in the puszta Hortobágy in eastern Hungary. It is a pity that taxonomists did not thoroughly com- pare the Russian and Hungarian ornithological papers concerning the former presence of Anser neglectus in these areas, because these rich sources refer to characteristics that would cast serious doubt on the classification ofAns - er neglectus as a subspecies, an individual variation or mutation of A. f. fabalis. Sushkin’s goose, though a typical Taiga Bean Goose, distinguished itself from other taxa of the Bean Goose by its plumage, its field identification, by its specific “Gé-gé” call, the size of its bill, and by its preference for warm and dry winter haunts.
  • The Role of the Republic of Karelia in Russia's Foreign and Security Policy

    The Role of the Republic of Karelia in Russia's Foreign and Security Policy

    Eidgenössische “Regionalization of Russian Foreign and Security Policy” Technische Hochschule Zürich Project organized by The Russian Study Group at the Center for Security Studies and Conflict Research Andreas Wenger, Jeronim Perovic,´ Andrei Makarychev, Oleg Alexandrov WORKING PAPER NO.5 MARCH 2001 The Role of the Republic of Karelia in Russia’s Foreign and Security Policy DESIGN : SUSANA PERROTTET RIOS This paper gives an overview of Karelia’s international security situation. The study By Oleg B. Alexandrov offers an analysis of the region’s various forms of international interactions and describes the internal situation in the republic, its economic conditions and its potential for integration into the European or the global economy. It also discusses the role of the main political actors and their attitude towards international relations. The author studies the general problem of center-periphery relations and federal issues, and weighs their effects on Karelia’s foreign relations. The paper argues that the international contacts of the regions in Russia’s Northwest, including those of the Republic of Karelia, have opened up opportunities for new forms of cooperation between Russia and the EU. These contacts have en- couraged a climate of trust in the border zone, alleviating the negative effects caused by NATO’s eastward enlargement. Moreover, the region benefits economi- cally from its geographical situation, but is also moving towards European standards through sociopolitical modernization. The public institutions of the Republic