Cultivating Curiosity About the Teaching of Classical Jewish Texts Jon A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cultivating Curiosity About the Teaching of Classical Jewish Texts Jon A Turn IT and Turn IT agaIn Studies in the Teaching and Learning of Classical Jewish Texts Jewish Identity in Post-Modern Society Series Editor: Roberta Rosenberg Farber – Yeshiva University Editorial Board: Sara Abosch – University of Memphis Geoffrey Alderman – University of Buckingham Yoram Bilu – Hebrew University Steven M. Cohen – Hebrew Union College – Jewish Institute of Religion Bryan Daves – Yeshiva University Sergio Della Pergola – Hebrew University Simcha Fishbane – Touro College Deborah Dash Moore – University of Michigan Uzi Rebhun – Hebrew University Reeva Simon – Yeshiva University Chaim I. Waxman – Rutgers University Turn IT and Turn IT agaIn Studies in the Teaching and Learning of Classical Jewish Texts Edited by Jon a. LEvISohn and SuSan P. FEndrICk Boston 2013 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data: The bibliographic data for this title is available from the Library of Congress. Copyright © 2013 Academic Studies Press All rights reserved ISBN 978-1-936235-63-6 (cloth) ISBN 978-1-61811-081-7 (electronic) Effective July 19, 2016, this book will be subject to a CC-BY-NC license. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. Other than as provided by these licenses, no part of this book may be reproduced, transmitted, or displayed by any electronic or mechanical means without permission from the publisher or as permitted by law. Cover design by Ivan Grave Published by Academic Studies Press in 2011 28 Montfern Avenue Brighton, MA 02135, USA [email protected] www.academicstudiespress.com For our parents Steve and Sybil Levisohn Camille Munz Fendrick and David Fendrick And for our children Ariella, Maya, and Jesse Meira, Shoshana, Adina, Matan, and Elianna Contents Acknowledgements 8 Foreword Sharon Feiman-Nemser 11 1 Cultivating Curiosity about the Teaching of Classical Jewish Texts Jon A. Levisohn and Susan P. Fendrick 13 PART 1: Focus on Subject Matter 2 A Map of Orientations to the Teaching of Bible Barry W. Holtz 26 3 What Are the Orientations to the Teaching of Rabbinic Literature? Jon A. Levisohn 52 4 Teaching Talmudic Hermeneutics Using a Semiotic Model of Law Daniel Reifman 81 5 Neusner, Brisk, and the Stam: Significant Methodologies for Meaningful Talmud Teaching and Study Michael Chernick 105 PART 2: Focus on Teaching and Teachers 6 The Pedagogy of Slowing Down: Teaching Talmud in a Summer Kollel Jane Kanarek 128 7 Serendipity and Pedagogy: Presenting the Weekly Parashah through Rabbinic Eyes Carl M. Perkins 158 8 Introducing the Bible: The Comparative Orientation in Practice Jon A. Levisohn 186 PART 3: Focus on Learning and Learners 9 Teaching Ancient Jewish History: An Experiment in Engaged Learning Michael Satlow 212 10 “A Judaism That Does Not Hide”: Curricular Warrants for the Teaching of the Documentary Hypothesis in Community Jewish High Schools Susan E. Tanchel 236 11 Developing Student Awareness of the Talmud as an Edited Document: A Pedagogy for the Pluralistic Jewish Day School Jeffrey Spitzer 264 12 A Theory of Havruta Learning Orit Kent 286 PART 4: Focus on Context 13 “Torah Talk”: Teaching Parashat Ha-shavua to Young Children Shira Horowitz 324 14 Using the Contextual Orientation to Facilitate the Study of Bible with Generation X Beth Cousens, Susan P. Fendrick, and Jeremy S. Morrison 352 15 Academic Study of the Talmud as a Spiritual Endeavor in Rabbinic Training: Delights and Dangers Jonah Chanan Steinberg 377 16 Teaching Rabbinics as an Ethical Endeavor and Teaching Ethics as a Rabbinic Endeavor Sarra Lev 388 List of Contributors 415 Index of Biblical and Rabbinic Sources 416 General Index 418 01 Acknowledgements This book emerges from the Initiative on Bridging Scholarship and Pedagogy in Jewish Studies, a research project at the Mandel Center for Studies in Jewish Education at Brandeis University. We owe a debt of gratitude, first, to Sharon Feiman-Nemser, director of the Mandel Center, for her enthusiastic support of the project from its inception, and her wise and experienced contributions to making it both exploratory and productive. We are grateful to the participants in the two Bridging Initiative research seminars in 2003-04 and 2006-07, who responded eagerly to our invitation to explore together what the serious study of the teaching and learning of classical Jew- ish texts could look like. The enthusiastic engagement of the participants in the Bridging Initiative conferences in 2005 and 2008 reaffirmed the importance of this work and contributed depth and texture to our understanding of the teaching and learning of classical Jewish texts. The work of the project could not have proceeded without the assistance of the staff of the Mandel Center over the last several years, as it progressed from seminars and conferences, to working papers and online vid- eos, to, now, this book: Nora Abrahamer, Janna Dorfman, Liz DiNolfo, Sarah Feinberg, Galit Higgins, Kimberly Hirsh, Valorie Kopp-Aharonov, Deb Laufer, Stacie Martinez, Crystal Massuda, Gevelyn McCaskill, Marcie Quaroni, Susanne Shavelson, Em- majoy Shulman-Kumin, Angela Viehland and David Weinstein. In particular, we want to acknowledge Belina Mizrahi and Beth Polasky for their assistance with the conferences in 2005 and 2008. At Brandeis, we appreciate the support and counsel of Marc Brettler, David Wright and Sylvia Barack Fishman, in their ca- pacity as chairs of the Department of Near Eastern and Judaic Studies, and of Sylvia Fuks Fried. At Academic Studies Press, we appreciate the patience and diligence of Sharona Vedol, Kira Nemirovsky, and Danielle Padula. 8 Acknowledgements We would be remiss if we did not particularly mention Lee Shulman. Throughout the evolution of the project, over and over again, we called upon both his scholarship and his friend- ship, and neither one ever failed us. We also express our gratitude to the Mandel Foundation for its partnership with Brandeis University in creating and sup- porting the Mandel Center and its work. The conference on Teaching Rabbinic Literature in 2008 was graciously and generously supported by a grant from the Wabash Center for Teaching and Learning in Theology and Re- ligion, as well as a grant from Combined Jewish Philanthropies (CJP). Another grant, from an anonymous source, enabled the videorecording of the conference and the publication of the video footage on the web. Finally, we are grateful to Targum Shlishi, a Raquel and Aryeh Rubin Foundation, for supporting the publication of this book. A number of the chapters of the book have been revised and condensed from articles first published elsewhere. Chap- ter 2 is adapted from the third chapter in Barry Holtz, Textual Knowledge: Teaching the Bible in Theory and Practice (JTSA Press, 2003) and is reprinted by permission of JTS Press. Chapter 3 is adapted from Jon A. Levisohn, “A Menu of Orientations to the Teaching of Rabbinic Literature,” Journal of Jewish Educa- tion 76:1 (2010), and is reprinted by permission of the pub- lisher (Taylor & Francis Ltd.). Chapter 6 is adapted from Jane Kanarek, “The Pedagogy of Slowing Down: Teaching Talmud in a Summer Kollel,” Teaching Theology and Religion 13:1 (2010), and is reprinted by permission of the publisher (John Wiley and Sons, Inc.). Chapter 8 is adapted from Jon A. Levisohn, “Introducing the Contextual Orientation to the Bible: A Com- parative Study,” Journal of Jewish Education 74:1 (2008), and is reprinted by permission of the publisher (Taylor & Francis Ltd.). Chapter 9 is adapted from Michael Satlow, “Narratives or Sources? Active Learning and the Teaching of Ancient Jewish History and Texts,” Teaching Theology and Religion 15:1 (2012), and is reprinted by permission of the publisher (John Wiley and Sons, Inc.). Chapter 10 is adapted from Susan E. Tanchel, “‘A Judaism That Does Not Hide’: Teaching the Documentary 9 Acknowledgments Hypothesis in a Pluralistic Jewish High School,” Journal of Jew- ish Education 74:1 (2008), and is reprinted by permission of the publisher (Taylor & Francis Ltd.). Chapter 12 is adapted from Orit Kent, “A Theory of Havruta Learning,” Journal of Jewish Education 76:3 (2010), and is reprinted by permission of the publisher (Taylor & Francis Ltd.). Chapter 14 is adapted from Beth Cousens et al., “Using the Contextual Orientation to Fa- cilitate the Study of Bible with Generation X,” Journal of Jewish Education 74:1 (2008), and is reprinted by permission of the publisher (Taylor & Francis Ltd.). Foreword Sharon Feiman-Nemser Kiddushin 40b: Rabbi Tarfon and the Elders were once re- clining in the upper story of Nitza’s house in Lod, when this question was raised before them: “Is study greater, or practice?” Rabbi Tarfon answered, saying: “Practice is greater.” Rabbi Akiba answered, saying: “Study is greater.” Then they all answered and said: “Study is greater, for study leads to practice.” Writing this Foreword is a particularly pleasurable task because Turn It and Turn It Again, the first book from the Mandel Center for Studies in Jewish Education at Brandeis University, captures so much of what the Center is about. Since its founding in 2002, the Mandel Center has become the address for serious research on teaching and learning in Jewish education. This collection of studies by thoughtful teachers of Bible and rabbinic literature exemplifies a new tradition of scholarship in Jewish education and demonstrates how the study of practice can lead to improved practice. An early project of the Mandel Center, the Initiative on Bridging Scholarship and Pedagogy in Jewish Studies was established to give teachers of Jewish studies—wherever and whomever they teach—the opportunity to explore how to create transformative learning experi- ences for their students. Led by Jon Levisohn, it brought together scholars and Jewish educators in seminars and conferences to work on questions of pedagogy and to understand better how research can strengthen practice. Besides introducing participants to research on the teaching and learning of specific subjects, the project supported teach- ers from diverse institutional settings and educational levels in studying some aspect of their teaching and/or their students’ learning.
Recommended publications
  • The Most Long-Lasting Schism in the History of the Jewish People”: in Leviticus 23:11 השבת a Fresh Look At
    Andrews University Seminary Studies, Vol. 56, No. 1, 47–62. Copyright © 2018 Andrews University Seminary Studies. A PROPOSED SOLUTION TO “THE MOST LONG-LASTING SCHISM IN THE HISTORY OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE”: IN LEVITICUS 23:11 השבת A FRESH LOOK AT Bradford Maris Berrien Springs, Michigan Abstract The term “S/sabbath” in Lev 23:11 provides the temporal orientation in verses 9–22 for both the sheaf elevation ritual of verses 10–14, on the following day, and the new grain offering ritual (Festival of Weeks), seven weeks thereafter. However, identity of the S/sabbath itself is contextually indeterminable in chapter 23, and has been disputed throughout the centuries. The various theories, all based upon cessation of human labor, contend for either a weekly Sabbath linked to the festival, or one of the two festival days that prohibit all occupational work, or a “Sabbath week.” Yet, none can demon- strably establish its claim as the specified S/sabbath over against the other theories. The only antecedent with requisite specificity for the term S/sabbath in verse 11 is derived from Exod 12:15, where the mandates the “cessation of leaven,” specifically שבת hiphil of the verb on the first day of the festival (Abib 15). This proposal, versus either the weekly Sabbath theory or the Sabbath-week theory, is corrobo- -complete,” modify“ , ְּתִמיֹמת rated by the essentiality of the adjective seven Sabbaths,” in Lev 23:15, which is rendered“ , ֶׁשַבע ַׁשָּבתֹות ing superfluous in the weekly Sabbath-based theories. Keywords: Sabbath, shabbat, ceremonial Sabbath, Sabbath week, wave sheaf, elevated sheaf, Festival of Unleavened Bread, Shavuot, Festival of Weeks, Pentecost, omer, tamim, Leviticus 23:11, Leviticus 23:15, Exodus 12:15.
    [Show full text]
  • Jesus & the Jewish Wedding Ceremony Pt.2
    Issue July-August 2018 / Av-Elul 5778 The Zion Letter The Monthly Newsletter of For Zion’s Sake Ministries, Inc. PO Box 1486 Bristol, TN 37620 www.forzionsake.org Phone: 276-644-1678 * Fax: 276-644-1689 * Email: [email protected] * Web: www.forzionsake.org Jesus & The Jewish Wedding Ceremony, Part 2 In last month's Zion Letter, we saw that Jesus followed the “Baruch Haba Bashem Adonai” (Blessed is He who pattern of the ancient Jewish wedding through the Erusin comes in the name of the Lord). (betrothal) stage. You may recall the words of Paul in 2Cor.11:2, "For I am jealous for you with a godly jeal- You may recall the word of Yeshua (Jesus) in Matthew ousy; for I betrothed you to one husband, that to Messiah I 23:37-39, when He said, "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, who might present you as a pure virgin." Beloved, we are kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her! How merely betrothed to Messiah in this life. Our wedding cer- often I wanted to gather your children together the way a emony and our bridegroom are yet to come! hen gathers her chicks under her wings and you were un- willing. Behold your house is being left to you desolate! For The ancient Jewish wedding ceremony had two parts: I say to you, from now on you shall not see Me until you Erusin (betrothal) and Nissuin (wedding). In Biblical say, ‘Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord’!” times, the two parts were held separately.
    [Show full text]
  • Halachic and Hashkafic Issues in Contemporary Society 24 - Must a Kallah Cover Her Hair - Part 1 Ou Israel Center - Summer 2016
    5776 - dbhbn ovrct [email protected] 1 sxc HALACHIC AND HASHKAFIC ISSUES IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY 24 - MUST A KALLAH COVER HER HAIR - PART 1 OU ISRAEL CENTER - SUMMER 2016 A] HAIR COVERING FOR MARRIED WOMEN A1] THE TORAH DERIVATION - SOTAH //// v tv Jt«r , t g rpU wv hbpk v tv , t i v«F v sh ng vu 1. jh:v rcsnc The head of the sotah was made ‘paru’a’ in public. What does ‘parua’ mean? ivk htbd atrv hukda ktrah ,ubck itfn 'v,uzck hsf tvrga ,ghke ,t r,ux - grpu 2. oa h"ar Rashi explains the expression ‘para’ to refer to untying the woman’s braids and learns from this that Jewish women must cover their head. How does he get from one to the other? grpu (jh:v rcsnc) unf ubukeu umna vkd,b /vkudn - gurp :h"ar) /o vhneC v­mnJk i º«r&vt v´«g rp(h F tU·v g­*rp h¬F o ºgv(, t Æv J«n tr³Hu 3. (vatv atr ,t vf:ck ,una Rashi clearly learns that the word ‘parua’ means ‘uncovered’. utk t,ga tuvvs kkfn grpu ch,fsn b"t ruxts kkfn vkguc kg ,utb,vk v,aga unf vsn sdbf vsn vkuubk hfv vk ibhscgsn 4. rehg ifu atr ,ugurp ,tmk ktrah ,ubc lrs iht vbhn gna ,uv vgurp /cg ,ucu,f h"ar Rashi on the Gemara gives two derivations for the halacha: (a) uncovering the woman’s hair was designed to be a public humiliation and thus we can infer that covering the hair in public is dignified; and (b) the need to uncover the hair of the married woman implies that married women’s hair was generally covered.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marriage Issue
    Association for Jewish Studies SPRING 2013 Center for Jewish History The Marriage Issue 15 West 16th Street The Latest: New York, NY 10011 William Kentridge: An Implicated Subject Cynthia Ozick’s Fiction Smolders, but not with Romance The Questionnaire: If you were to organize a graduate seminar around a single text, what would it be? Perspectives THE MAGAZINE OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR JEWISH STUDIES Table of Contents From the Editors 3 From the President 3 From the Executive Director 4 The Marriage Issue Jewish Marriage 6 Bluma Goldstein Between the Living and the Dead: Making Levirate Marriage Work 10 Dvora Weisberg Married Men 14 Judith Baskin ‘According to the Law of Moses and Israel’: Marriage from Social Institution to Legal Fact 16 Michael Satlow Reading Jewish Philosophy: What’s Marriage Got to Do with It? 18 Susan Shapiro One Jewish Woman, Two Husbands, Three Laws: The Making of Civil Marriage and Divorce in a Revolutionary Age 24 Lois Dubin Jewish Courtship and Marriage in 1920s Vienna 26 Marsha Rozenblit Marriage Equality: An American Jewish View 32 Joyce Antler The Playwright, the Starlight, and the Rabbi: A Love Triangle 35 Lila Corwin Berman The Hand that Rocks the Cradle: How the Gender of the Jewish Parent Influences Intermarriage 42 Keren McGinity Critiquing and Rethinking Kiddushin 44 Rachel Adler Kiddushin, Marriage, and Egalitarian Relationships: Making New Legal Meanings 46 Gail Labovitz Beyond the Sanctification of Subordination: Reclaiming Tradition and Equality in Jewish Marriage 50 Melanie Landau The Multifarious
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of a Teacher Education Programme Tengku Sarina
    Teaching and learning experiences in Malaysian higher education: A case study of a teacher education programme Tengku Sarina Aini Tengku Kasim A thesis submitted to Auckland University of Technology in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) 2012 School of Education Te Kura Matauranga TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .....................................................................................................viii LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................... ix ATTESTATION OF AUTHORSHIP ........................................................................... x ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................... xi ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................xiii CHAPTER 1 .................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Background to this study ....................................................................................... 1 1.3 Personal qualifications and professional experience ............................................. 5 1.4 Personal assumptions ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Two Screens: on Mary Douglas S Proposal
    The Two Screens: On Mary Douglass Proposal for a Literary Structure to the Book of Leviticus* Gary A. Rendsburg In memoriam – Mary Douglas (1921–2007) In the middle volume of her recent trio of monographs devoted to the priestly source in the Torah, Mary Douglas proposes that the book of Leviticus bears a literary structure that reflects the layout and config- uration of the Tabernacle.1 This short note is intended to supply further support to this proposal, though first I present a brief summary of the work, its major suppositions, and its principal finding. The springboard for Douglass assertion is the famous discovery of Ramban2 (brought to the attention of modern scholars by Nahum Sar- na3) that the tripartite division of the Tabernacle reflects the similar tripartite division of Mount Sinai. As laid out in Exodus 19 and 24, (a) the people as a whole occupied the lower slopes; (b) Aaron, his two sons, and the elders were permitted halfway up the mountain; and (c) only Moses was allowed on the summit. In like fashion, according to the priestly instructions in Exodus 25–40 and the book of Leviticus, (a) the people as a whole were allowed to enter the outer court of the Taberna- * It was my distinct pleasure to deliver an oral version of this article at the Mary Douglas Seminar Series organized by the University of London in May 2005, in the presence of Professor Douglas and other distinguished colleagues. I also take the op- portunity to thank my colleague Azzan Yadin for his helpful comments on an earlier version of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • STUDY Questions and Answers 2
    Women’s League for Conservative Judaism Mishpachah: The Modern Jewish Family MODERN RITUALS A Search for New Meanings This study guide has been prepared by Rabbi Gail Labovitz, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Rabbinic Literature and former chair of the Department of Rabbinics for the Ziegler School of Rabbinic Studies. Prior to joining the faculty at AJU, Dr. Labovitz worked as the Senior Research Analyst in Judaism for the Feminist Sexual Ethics Project at Brandeis University, and as the Coordinator for the Jewish Women’s Research Group, a project of the Women’s Studies Program at JTS. Her widely acclaimed recent work, Marriage and Metaphor: Constructions of Gender in Rabbinic Literature, focuses on metaphors of ownership by which rabbinic culture shaped its dominant model of marriage and gender relations. Texts for this study session are on a separate document, Study:Rabbinic Texts Behold you are [fill in the blank] to me…. New Approaches to Modern Wedding Ceremonies by Dr. Gail Labovitz INTRODUCTION Jewish marriage, at least since the time of the rabbis of late antiquity, has been created through the rite and legal act known most commonly as kiddushin. When the groom places a ring on the finger of the bride under the huppah and says to her, “Harei at mikudeshet li b’taba’at zo k’dat Moshe v’Yisrael,” “Behold, you are betrothed [mikudeshet] to me according to the law of Moses and Israel,” he has just performed kiddushin. Although there is more to the wedding ceremony (such as the Sheva Berachot, the Seven Blessings), from this moment on the couple is legally bound and need a Jewish divorce document, known as a get, to sever their connection.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacob Milgrom, June 7, 2010 1
    Baruch J. Schwartz, Funeral of Jacob Milgrom, June 7, 2010 1 ל"ז JACOB MILGROM RABBI, PROFESSOR, TEACHER AND MENTOR My master and teacher, Jacob: After thirty years together, it’s time to say good-bye. Each year, on a Shabbat morning towards the end of the winter, the cycle of Torah reading arrives at the words, “The LORD called to Moses and spoke to him from the Tent of Meeting, saying” (Leviticus 1:1). Customarily, at this point the congregation begins to doze off and finally to fall asleep. You, however, came awake. In the sacrificial offerings, in the bodily impurities and the abhorrent acts, in the lesions on skin, garments and walls, in the minutiae of prohibited fowl and in the precise definitions of forbidden sexual acts, in Aaron’s annual ritual of atonement and in the unauthorized fire of Nadab and Abihu, in assessments, proscriptions and tithes, you discovered an intriguing and inspiring world. In the details, you found perfection. You found internal logic, you found a comprehensive and systematic Torah, and you found God Himself. Throughout the greater part of your life you applied yourself to the sacred task of revealing the hidden light in the priestly writings, meticulously building of its prescriptions and prohibitions a structure certain to withstand the test of time. No longer do the worshipers fall asleep when they arrive at the book of Leviticus, and this they – all of us – owe to you alone. Your work – your books, commentaries and essays – have not only paved a new way; they have shown the way for the rest of us, bequeathing a lasting legacy to future generations as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomos and Narrative Before Nomos and Narrative
    Nomos and Narrative Before Nomos and Narrative Steven D. Fraade* I imagine that when Robert Cover's Nomos and Narrative essay' first reached the editors of the Harvard Law Review, their befuddlement derived not so much from Cover's framing of his review of the 1982 Supreme Court term with a philosophically opaque discussion of the interdependence of law and narrative, but from the illustrations that he drew from biblical and rabbinic texts of ancient and medieval times. For Cover, both intellectually and as a matter of personal commitment, these ancient texts evoke a "nomian world," rooted more in communally shared stories of legal origins and utopian ends than in the brutalities of institutional enforcement, one from which modem legal theory and practice have much to learn and to emulate. Since my own head is buried most often in such ancient texts, rather than in modem courts, I thought it appropriate to reflect, by way of offering more such texts for our consideration, on the long-standing preoccupation with the intersection and interdependency of the discursive modes of law and narrative in Hebrew biblical and rabbinic literature, without, I hope, romanticizing them. Indeed, I wish to demonstrate that what we might think of as a particularly modem tendency to separate law from narrative, has itself an ancient history, and to show how that tendency, while recurrent, was as recurrently resisted from within Jewish tradition. In particular, at those cultural turning points in which laws are extracted or codified from previous narrative settings, I hope to show that they are also renarrativized (or remythologized) so as to address, both ideologically and rhetorically, changed socio-historical settings.2 I will do so through admittedly * Steven D.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Hidary
    RICH A R D H I D A R Y CURRICULUM VITAE POSITIONS AND FELLOWSHIPS 2018-2019 Wexner Heritage Program Atlanta, GA Faculty 2018-2019 University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA Katz Family Fellow, Katz Center for Advanced Judaic Studies 2016-2017 Harvard University Cambridge, MA Starr Fellow, Center for Jewish Studies 2013-2016 Congregation Shearith Israel New York, NY Distinguished Rabbinic Fellow 2011-2014 The Tikvah Center at NYU New York, NY Affiliate Scholar 2007-2010 Cardozo Law School New York, NY Graduate Fellow in Jewish Law and Interdisciplinary Studies 2000-2004 New York University New York, NY ◼ McCracken Fellowship TEACHING Yeshiva University New York, NY 2014-present Associate Professor of Judaic Studies 2008-2014 Assistant Professor of Judaic Studies Courses in Bible Talmud and Midrash Second Temple Jewish History and Dead Sea Scrolls Jewish Ethics 2002-13, 2016-19 Sephardic Synagogue Brooklyn, NY Educational Director/Rabbi 2003-2008 Brooklyn College Brooklyn, NY PHONE (718) 986 - 4664 • E - M A I L [email protected] 457 QUENTIN RD. • BROOKLYN , N Y 1 1223 Adjunct Lecturer, Judaic Studies Contemporary Issues in Jewish Law ◼ Maimonides: Philosopher, Legalist, Physician ◼ Introduction to Talmud; Introduction to Midrash ◼ Deuteronomy; Psalms; Job and the Problem of Evil 2002–2006 New York University New York, NY Instructor & Teaching Assistant ◼ Ancient Israel; Muslim Spain ◼ The Historical Jesus; Early Christianity ◼ Jewish Ethics EDUCATION 2000–2007 New York University New York, NY ◼ Doctorate in Hebrew & Judaic Studies 1999-2000
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded Onto My Personal Computer; Transcribed; and Kept Under Password Following UBC BREB Guidelines
    Muslim–Canadian Educator’s Pedagogies: Tools for Teaching, Learning, and Transforming by Claire Alkouatli B.Sc., University of Victoria, 1995 M.A., University of British Columbia, 2015 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Doctor of Philosophy in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Human Development, Learning and Culture) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) April 2020 © Claire Alkouatli, 2020 The following individuals certify that they have read, and recommend to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies for acceptance, the dissertation entitled: Muslim–Canadian Educator’s Pedagogies: Tools for Teaching, Learning, & Transforming submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements by Claire Alkouatli for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Human Development, Learning, and Culture Examining Committee: Dr. Jasmin Zine, Professor, Sociology and Muslim Studies, Wilfrid Laurier University Supervisor Dr. Ali Abdi, Professor, Department of Educational Studies (EDST), UBC Supervisory Committee Member Dr. Barbara Weber, Associate Professor, HDLC, EPSE, UBC Supervisory Committee Member Dr. Deborah Butler, Professor, HDLC, EPSE, UBC University Examiner Dr. Samuel Rocha, Associate Professor, EDST, UBC University Examiner Dr. Mohamad Abdalla, Professor, Islamic Studies, University of South Australia External Examiner ii Abstract Islamic Education is a topic often clouded by stereotypes, misperceptions, and charges of antiquation and indoctrination, yet little empirical research
    [Show full text]
  • Why Does Eleazer Sprinkle the Red Cow Blood? Making Sense of A
    The Journal of Hebrew Scriptures ISSN 1203-1542 http://www.jhsonline.org and http://purl.org/jhs Articles in JHS are being indexed in the ATLA Religion Database, RAMBI and THEOLDI. Their abstracts appear in Religious and Theological Abstracts. The journal is archived by the National Library of Canada, and is accessible for consultation and research at the Electronic Collection site maintained by the The National Library of Canada. VOLUME 6, ARTICLE 9 WILLIAM K. GILDERS, WHY DOES ELEAZAR SPRINKLE THE RED COW BLOOD? MAKING SENSE OF A BIBLICAL RITUAL 1 2 JOURNAL OF HEBREW SCRIPTURES WHY DOES ELEAZAR SPRINKLE THE RED COW BLOOD? MAKING SENSE OF A BIBLICAL RITUAL WILLIAM K. GILDERS EMORY UNIVERSITY 1. INTRODUCTION Numbers 19 is a prescriptive ritual text that sets forth procedures for dealing with the impurity that occurs when a human being dies. The chapter consists of two units of instruction for the performance of ritual complexes (sets of ritual actions) directed against death impurity. The first part of the chapter (vv. 1-10) is concerned with the preparation of ash by burning a slaughtered “red” cow along with various substances.1 The second half of the chapter (vv. 11-22), not treated in this paper, prescribes how the ash is to be used. חטאת In Num 19:9, the red cow is apparently designated a ,offering חטאת purification offering”), but it is unlike any other“) indeed, quite unlike any other sacrifice.2 The animal is not brought to the cult shrine, the Tent of Meeting, to be offered on the altar. Instead, it is slaughtered outside of the Israelite encampment and entirely burned there, no part of the animal being offered on the altar.
    [Show full text]