The Tainted Aesthetic of Djuna Barnes's Nightwood

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Tainted Aesthetic of Djuna Barnes's Nightwood Miranda Revue pluridisciplinaire du monde anglophone / Multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal on the English- speaking world 21 | 2020 Modernism and the Obscene “Obscene and touching”–the tainted aesthetic of Djuna Barnes’s Nightwood Margaret Gillespie Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/miranda/27773 DOI: 10.4000/miranda.27773 ISSN: 2108-6559 Publisher Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès Electronic reference Margaret Gillespie, ““Obscene and touching”–the tainted aesthetic of Djuna Barnes’s Nightwood”, Miranda [Online], 21 | 2020, Online since 09 October 2020, connection on 16 February 2021. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/miranda/27773 ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/miranda.27773 This text was automatically generated on 16 February 2021. Miranda is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. “Obscene and touching”–the tainted aesthetic of Djuna Barnes’s Nightwood 1 “Obscene and touching”–the tainted aesthetic of Djuna Barnes’s Nightwood Margaret Gillespie Introduction: Barnes scholarship and the question of obscenity 1 A number of scholars (Gilmore 1994,1 Plumb 1995, 2 Faltejskova 2010 3) have viewed obscenity in Djuna Barnes’s writing as primarily a question of eluding institutional and societal constraints where her censored modernist peers famously failed.4 The author’s Ladies Almanack (1928), a bawdy chapbook celebrating American heiress Natalie Barney’s lesbian coterie, for instance, was privately printed as a limited edition and covertly hawked on the streets of Paris. Such was the linguistic opacity of the once- performed play, The Antiphon (1958), written in arcane Shakespearean-style verse, that its disturbing theme—a father’s sexual abuse of his daughter—went largely unnoticed.5 The novel Ryder (1928), a “female Tom Jones” (Caselli 197) in the novelist’s own words, and Nightwood (1936), loosely based on Barnes’s ill-fated Parisian love affair with silverpoint artist Thelma Wood, were both partially “sanitized” at editorial stage to avoid censorship, with or without the novelist’s assent.6 2 One of T.S. Eliot’s key concerns, in his role as editor for Nightwood, published in London by the highly respectable Faber and Faber in 1936, was that the novel would suffer the same fate as Ulysses, be judged obscene, go to court and be banned (Blake 153). Eliot’s misgivings were certainly not without foundation for a text that in the words of Jane Marcus “flaunt [s] every possible taboo from the excretory to the sexual and […] invent [s] taboos uncatalogued even by Freud” (Marcus 2004: 102). The publisher took a number of precautionary steps, “robing” the novel in a drab and worthy introduction— the discursive equivalent of “pale grey,” as one contemporary reviewer aptly observed (Potter 173), and excising explicit references to homosexuality. Terms like “fairy,” Miranda, 21 | 2020 “Obscene and touching”–the tainted aesthetic of Djuna Barnes’s Nightwood 2 “faggot” and “queen” (Faltejskova 95) as well as many of the cross-dressing protagonist Matthew O’Connor’s, saucier same-sex tales and escapades were removed.7 Earlier in the editorial process, Emily Coleman, Barnes’s friend and de facto literary agent, also convinced her to cut lines referring to O’Connor’s flannel nightgown as “not only the womanly, but the incestuous garment,” claiming the lines were “meaningless” (Hollis 245). 3 Yet as Diane Chisolm has rightly observed, the bounds of legal discourse are just one benchmark by which obscenity may be judged: “obscene art may be legalized by new court rulings and/or legitimized by a body of liberal taste and still retain the power to shock” (Chisolm 169). Eliot was successful in publishing Nightwood, but even after partial bowdlerization, it still remained “considerably more sexually explicit” than most books previously published in the United Kingdom (Potter 173). Reading Nightwood through Sade and the surrealists among others, Chisolm showcases its transgressive potential which she argues deploys “a vast battery of obscene materials” to irreverently assail the regimented norms of legal, sexological and theological discourse to figure a mise-en-texte of the “‘obscene’ frame of speech in which any unbecoming sexuality must be lived and thought” (Chisolm 195, 172). For Rachel Potter, Nightwood’s obscene “bodies, minds and words” are significant in highlighting a shift in the inter-war cultural climate and the demise of moral censoriousness, occasioning a veritable sea change in the parameters of what would constitute literary value and novelistic form (Potter 174). 4 My focus and interest here, however, lie less in the “flaunted,” manifest, obscenity of Nightwood than in the notion of the obscene as an issue of problematic visibility within the text. Returning to the twin etymological origins of the term, the Latin obscaenus meaning “from or with filth, ill-omened or abominable,” and the Greek ob skene, meaning “off-stage, not fit to be seen on-stage” (McKay 80), I propose to explore not only what “filth” or “abomination” the narrative openly reveals, but what it also conceals within its discomfiting poetics. More specifically, drawing on the interface between literature and trauma theory, I will discuss how a text like Nightwood may function as a conduit, enabling the textual enactment of the repressed/ob-scene memory of abominable/obscene traumatic experience. This is not to suggest a reading of the narrative as biographical mapping. Central to my thesis is the notion that traumatic memories cannot be accessed directly but paradoxically come into being only through the process of testimony—in Barnes’s case, the creative process that is then offered up to the reader as witness. But how is this “ob-scene obscene” figured in the narrative? Is there a discernable poetics, or even ethics, of the obscene? My exploration will open, by way of example, with a reading of Nightwood’s unsettling final chapter, which offers an instance of both manifest and latent obscenity. We will go on to see how the character of Robin Vote functions within the logic of the narrative to encode traumatic memory, and more specifically the trauma of incest. This will lead us to reflect upon the interplay of incest, traumatic memory and modernist textuality before offering a series of readings towards the definition of a poetics of the “ob-scene obscene” in Nightwood and asking whether the creative act may have an ethical role to play in healing an authorial voice possessed by its traumatic past. Miranda, 21 | 2020 “Obscene and touching”–the tainted aesthetic of Djuna Barnes’s Nightwood 3 Nightwood: the unsettling final chapter 5 As he revised Nightwood prior to publication, Eliot had also initially been keen to suppress the novel’s controversial final coda chapter, “The Possessed,” set in a decaying chapel where the female character Robin Vote fights with a dog belonging to her former lover Nora, before collapsing into tears and bringing the dog down with her (Caselli 181). The manuscripts of the last versions of Nightwood show that even though the chapter was finally retained, Eliot was still considering replacing the expression “obscene” in the final paragraph by the more innocuous “unclean”—a recommendation Barnes refused to follow, wryly dismissing it as an “example of T.S. Eliot’s ‘lack of imagination’”8: Then she began to bark also, crawling after him—barking in a fit of laughter, obscene and touching. Crouching, the dog began to run with her, head-on with her head, as if to circumvent her; soft and slow his feet went padding. He ran this way and that, low down in his throat crying, and she grinning and crying with him; crying in shorter and shorter spaces, moving head to head, until she gave up, lying out, her hands beside her, her face turned and weeping; and the dog too gave up then, and lay down, his eyes bloodshot, his head flat along her knees. (139) 6 The meaning of the passage was apparently obvious to Barnes herself—“Let the reader make up his own mind if hes [sic] not an idiot he’ll know” she commented (Plumb 1995: xv)—and it has prompted clear responses from some critics. In his 1975 assessment for instance, Robert Nadeau had no qualms in pronouncing the passage “strangely beautiful in spite of the fact that the action described would be considered obscene by almost any standard” (Nadeau 160, my emphasis). More recently, Teresa de Lauretis has described it as “shocking in its unequivocal simulation of a sexual act from frenzied crescendo to failed orgasmic release” (De Lauretis 121). Yet the scene has largely invited a “critical silence” (Blake 161) on the part of scholars, and those who have chosen to comment on the ending have tended to either stand pruriently back, viewing it as a dystopian descent into bestiality, or to offer oblique or abstract appraisals of its possible meaning. Kannenstine’s 1977 monograph on Barnes, Duality and Damnation, for instance, refers to “a bizarre ritualistic ceremony with the beast which brings her down to its level” (Kannenstine 94, my emphasis) and Jane Marcus retreats behind the cover of allusion referring simply to “the novel’s controversial last scene with the dog” (Marcus 1984: 154). Avoiding the sexual question altogether, Donna Gerstenberger has interpreted the ending as a postmodern riff on The Waste Land (Gerstenberger 39)9 while Erin Carlston sees it as an “ironic rebuttal of fascism” (Carlston 79); many twenty-first- century scholars have pursued Gerstenberger’s and Carlston’s less literal approach, reading the passage through the lens of queer theory or the posthuman (Blake 162).10 7 My own unease around this passage comes from elsewhere and is rooted in the oxymoron—“obscene and touching”—with which the narrative voice glosses the episode. The expression points to an unresolved tension between a doting, sentimental gaze on the one hand (“touching”) and a moral abomination on the other (“obscene”), and seems to invite the reader to be at once charmed and yet troubled by the spectacle conjured up before their eyes—that “strangely beautiful” scene in Robert Nadeau’s words.
Recommended publications
  • Djuna Barnes's Bewildering Corpus. by Daniela Caselli. Burlington, VT
    Book Reviews Improper Modernism: Djuna Barnes’s Bewildering Corpus. By Daniela Caselli. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2009. x + 290 pp. $114.95 cloth. Modernist Articulations: A Cultural Study of Djuna Barnes, Mina Loy, and Gertrude Stein. By Alex Goody. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. xii + 242 pp. $75.00 cloth. TextWkg.indd 153 1/4/11 3:35:48 PM 154 THE SPACE BETWEEN Djuna Barnes’ Consuming Fictions. By Diane Warren. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2008. xviii + 188 pp. $99.95 cloth. It is something of a scandal that so many people read Nightwood, a text that used to be so scandalous. For much of the twentieth century, the obscurity of Djuna Barnes’s novel was considered to be a central part of its appeal. To read or recommend it was to participate in a subversive or subcultural tradition, an alternative modernism that signified variouslylesbian , queer, avant-garde. Within the expanded field of recent modernist scholarship, however, Barnes’s unread masterpiece is now simply a masterpiece, one of the usual suspects on conference programs and syllabi. Those of us who remain invested in Barnes’s obscurity, however, can take comfort in the fact that, over the course of her long life and comparatively short career, Barnes produced an unruly body of work that is unlikely to be canonized. Indeed, Barnes’s reputation has changed: once treated as one of modern- ism’s interesting background figures, fodder to fill out the footnotes of her more famous male colleagues, she has now become instead a single-work author, a one-hit wonder. And no wonder; the rest of her oeuvre is made up of journalism, a Rabelaisian grab-bag of a novel, seemingly slight poems and stories, a Jacobean revenge drama, and an alphabetic bestiary.
    [Show full text]
  • Djuna Barnes Nightwood. a Modernist Exercise
    ENRIQUE GARCÍA DIEZ UNIVERSIDAD DE VALENCIA DJUNA BARNES'NIGHTWOOD; A MODERNIST EXERCISE "On or about December 1910 human life changed." These now famous words of Virginia Woolf tried to reflect the consciousness of the speed of change at the beginning of the century. This sort of dramatic or prophetic gesture only revealed the intensity with which writers and artists of all kinds lived one of the most dynamic periods of hvunan history. James McFarlane and Malcom Bradbury go so far as to say that Modernism was one of those overwhelming dislocations in human perception which changed man's sensibility and man's relationship to history permanently. In its multiplicity and brilliant confusión, its commitment to an aesthetic of endless renewal, or as Irving Howe calis it, its improvisation of "the tradition of the new," Modernism is still open to analysis and to debate. Even if we are talking of Postmodernism and even Post-postmodernism, the period we are referring to now (first quarter of the century, roughly) does not have a single concrete and aesthetic reference. As a matter of fact, few ages been as múltiple and as promiscuous in their artistic cholees as was Modernism. Very often, though, the tendency to sophistication and mannerism, to introversión, and to technical display for its own sake and even internal scepticism have often been cited as essential in the definition of Modernism. And since the terms have a vague connotation, we will have to establish some kind of framework of reference or definition of the movement in order to move relatively safely in the analysis of a novel often mentioned as a masterpiece of modern aesthetics.
    [Show full text]
  • Lowry's Reading
    LOWRY'S READING An Introductory Essay W. H. New 1Ν TWO LARGE BOXES at the University of British Columbia are the remnants of Malcolm Lowry's library, a motley collection of works that ranges from Emily Brontë and Olive Schreiner to Djuna Barnes and Virginia Woolf, from the Kenyon, Partisan, and Sewanee Reviews to A Pocketful of Canada, from Latin Prose Composition to the Metropolitan Opera Guide, and from Elizabethan plays to Kafka and Keats. Little escaped his attention, in other words, and even such a partial list as this one indicates his eclectic and energetic insatiability for books. That he was also an inveterate film-goer and jazz en- thusiast, and that he absorbed and remembered everything he experienced, makes any effort to separate out the individual influences on his work an invidious one; rather like chasing a rabbit through Ali Baba's caves, the activity seems in- commensurate with its surroundings. But on frequent occasions an appreciation of the scope of his references or the source of a single allusion will take us closer to Lowry's tone and method. Richard Hauer Costa, for example, writing in the University of Toronto Quarterly in 1967, points out that "unacknowledged literary kinship" between Under the Volcano, Aiken's Blue Voyage, and Joyce's Ulysses: the central use of the quest theme, the burgeoning sense of remorse, the "impatience" of the author with usual narrative methods, and so on. The Consul's "garden scene" in Chapter Five thus becomes an analogue to Joyce's Nighttown episode, and Lowry's dislocation of time, his recognition of what Costa elsewhere calls the "weight of the past", relates to Joyce's and Proust's.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Djuna Barnes's Nightwood
    Performance and Grief: An Analysis of Djuna Barnes’s Nightwood by Theresa Anita McCarron Gaumond, B.A. A Thesis Submitted to the Department of English California State University Bakersfield In Partial Fulfillment for the Degree of Masters of Arts Spring 2013 Copyright by Theresa Anita Gaumond 2013 This Thesis, "Performance and Grief: An Analysis ofDjuna Barnes's Nightwood" by Theresa Anita McCarron Gaumond, B.A. has been accepted on behalf of the Department of English by their supervisory committee: Dr. Kim Flachmann Dedication I wish to dedicate this thesis to the memories of Joseph Hill, Beverly Baker and Heather Bartek. Acknowledgements I would sincerely like to thank Dr. Ayuso and Dr. Flachmann for taking the time and energy to advise me. Both of them generously offered to assist me and their guidance has been integral to the creation of this paper. I am continually humbled by both of their dedication to the education of students. Since a project of this magnitude cannot be created in a vacuum, I need to graciously thank those who have served as a sounding board for my ideas: Lisbeth Tinocco, Nora Traut, Laura Peet, Darlene Stotler, Dave Ryan, Chris Dison, Jeff Eagan, and Monica Diaz-Padilla. Also, Kathy Hafler and Milissa Ackerley both were sources of encouragement. I also need to thank my co-tutors at the Bakersfield College Writing Center for the rabid debates on word choice. The epic discussion on “myriad” and “plethora” ensured that I would not use either word in this thesis. Special thanks are also directed to Shelia Youngblood for her cheerful willingness to serve as an editor.
    [Show full text]
  • Djuna Barnes B
    DJUNA BARNES b. June 12, 1892 d. June 18, 1982 AUTHOR “The truth is how you say it, and to be ‘one’s self’ is the most shocking custom of all.” Djuna Barnes was a prominent modernist writer known for her experimental style and edgy themes. Writers such as Truman Capote and Bertha Born in Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York, to a polygamist family, she was inspired to write by her grandmother, a feminist writer and journalist. As a child, Barnes was Harris have cited sexually abused by family members. In 1909, she was forced to marry her father’s Barnes as an inspiration brother-in-law. Two months later, she left him. for their works. In 1912, Barnes moved to Greenwich Village and began writing for magazines and newspapers. She had affairs with men and women. She wrote novels, including “The Book of Repulsive Woman: 8 Rhythms and 5 Drawings” and “Paprika Johnson.” She moved to Paris, where she lived with Thelma Wood, her lover and fellow artist. Barnes became involved in the Parisian lesbian community, which is depicted in her privately printed novel, “Ladies Almanack.” In 1931, after her relationship with Wood ended, Barnes relocated to England. She stayed in a country manor with other writers and literary critics. She wrote “Nightwood,” her best-known novel, which received attention for its stylistic excellence. So impressed by the book, T.S. Elliot wrote the introduction and became involved in its publication. “Nightwood” depicts desire between women and challenges the gender binary. In 1939, Barnes returned to New York, where she lived in relative solitude for the remainder of her life.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Baroque Narratives in Interwar Atlantic Modernism
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses 5-8-2020 WRITING AGAINST HISTORY: FEMINIST BAROQUE NARRATIVES IN INTERWAR ATLANTIC MODERNISM Annaliese Hoehling Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the Literature in English, Anglophone outside British Isles and North America Commons, Literature in English, British Isles Commons, and the Literature in English, North America Commons Recommended Citation Hoehling, Annaliese, "WRITING AGAINST HISTORY: FEMINIST BAROQUE NARRATIVES IN INTERWAR ATLANTIC MODERNISM" (2020). Doctoral Dissertations. 1932. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/1932 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WRITING AGAINST HISTORY: FEMINIST BAROQUE NARRATIVES IN INTERWAR ATLANTIC MODERNISM A Dissertation Presented by ANNALIESE D. HOEHLING Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2020 Department of English © Copyright by Annaliese D. Hoehling 2020 All Rights Reserved WRITING AGAINST
    [Show full text]
  • The Imagery of Interior Spaces
    the imagery of interior spaces Before you start to read this book, take this moment to think about making a donation to punctum books, an independent non-profit press, @ https://punctumbooks.com/support/ If you’re reading the e-book, you can click on the image below to go directly to our donations site. Any amount, no matter the size, is appreciated and will help us to keep our ship of fools afloat. Contri- butions from dedicated readers will also help us to keep our commons open and to cultivate new work that can’t find a welcoming port elsewhere. Our ad- venture is not possible without your support. Vive la Open Access. Fig. 1. Hieronymus Bosch, Ship of Fools (1490–1500) the imagery of interior spaces. Copyright © 2019 by the editors and au- thors. This work carries a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 International li- cense, which means that you are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and you may also remix, transform and build upon the material, as long as you clearly attribute the work to the authors (but not in a way that suggests the authors or punctum books endorses you and your work), you do not use this work for commercial gain in any form whatsoever, and that for any remixing and transformation, you distribute your rebuild under the same license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ First published in 2019 by punctum books, Earth, Milky Way. https://punctumbooks.com ISBN-13: 978-1-950192-19-9 (print) ISBN-13: 978-1-950192-20-5 (ePDF) doi: 10.21983/P3.0248.1.00 lccn: 2019937173 Library of Congress Cataloging Data is available from the Library of Congress Book design: Vincent W.J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Performative Personhood of Elizabeth Robins, Djuna Barnes, and the Baroness Elsa Von Freytag- Loringhoven
    Illinois State University ISU ReD: Research and eData Theses and Dissertations 6-29-2018 Women Of The Future: The Performative Personhood Of Elizabeth Robins, Djuna Barnes, And The Baroness Elsa Von Freytag- Loringhoven Michelle Feda Illinois State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the Theatre History Commons Recommended Citation Feda, Michelle, "Women Of The Future: The Performative Personhood Of Elizabeth Robins, Djuna Barnes, And The Baroness Elsa Von Freytag-Loringhoven" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 917. https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd/917 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ISU ReD: Research and eData. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ISU ReD: Research and eData. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WOMEN OF THE FUTURE: THE PERFORMATIVE PERSONHOOD OF ELIZABETH ROBINS, DJUNA BARNES, AND THE BARONESS ELSA VON FREYTAG- LORINGHOVEN MICHELLE FEDA 67 Pages The New Woman is the term used to describe the idea of a woman who embodied the changing social norms around her involvement in public life during the fin-de-siècle. New Women were bold and brash, educated and independent, and, importantly young; the term encapsulated any particular woman who stepped outside of her mother's Victorian social norms. The New Woman was as much a construct of the time as it was a description. The playwright and suffragette Elizabeth Robins performs “new womanhood” on the stage, and her play Votes for Women! enacts this struggle between New Women and the older generation.
    [Show full text]
  • FT Marinetti, Djuna Barnes, and Gertrude Stein
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 12-2003 Domesticity and the modernist aesthetic : F.T. Marinetti, Djuna Barnes, and Gertrude Stein Allison Elise Carey Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Recommended Citation Carey, Allison Elise, "Domesticity and the modernist aesthetic : F.T. Marinetti, Djuna Barnes, and Gertrude Stein. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2003. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/5115 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Allison Elise Carey entitled "Domesticity and the modernist aesthetic : F.T. Marinetti, Djuna Barnes, and Gertrude Stein." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in English. Allen Dunn, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Allison Elise Careyentitled "Domesticity and the ModernistAesthetic: F.T. Marinetti, Djuna Barnes, and Gertrude Stein." I have examinedthe finalpaper copy of this dissertation forform and content and recommend that it be accepted in partialfulfillment of the requirements for the degreeof Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in English.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Politics/Poetics, Late Modernism, and Elizabeth Bowen's the Last September
    Spatial Politics/Poetics, Late Modernism, and Elizabeth Bowen’s The Last September SIÂN E. WHITE, JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In her 1956 talk “Truth and Fiction” on the BBC Home Service, Elizabeth Bowen (1962, 135) speaks about story time in spatial terms: “The good story is a suc- cession of effective Nows — call them scenes, if you like — and those Nows are linked together by intermediate action. We may move backwards and forwards, but the present moment must grip and hold us, so that while we read it is as important — more important — as the moment in the room where we are in our chair.” In linking moments in time (the reading moment and the story time moment) together in terms of spatial juxtaposition rather than temporal sequenc- ing, Bowen celebrates spatialization as a way of reading and a way of writing.1 The snapshots of “effective Nows” create story as a montage might, collapsing time by showing simultaneous events in different spaces, like reading the page of a newspaper. In the next moment in the broadcast, Bowen links that aesthetic to high modernism, remarking that the “master of the dramatic Now was Virginia Woolf,” with her use of “extraordinary simultaneousness in which a number of things may be made dramatic by happening close to each other” (135 – 36). Those “things made dramatic” might be happening closely in the space of the story world or on the space of the textual page. Bowen is not clear on this point, but Joseph Frank’s similar response to the experimental forms of writers from the high modernist 1910s and 1920s suggests the latter.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Dada Paul Hjartarson University of Alberta
    Living Dada Paul Hjartarson University of Alberta When she is dada she is the only one living anywhere who dresses dada, loves dada, lives dada. Jane Heap writing in e Little Review about the Baroness G’ B E is the fi rst book-length, scholarly Ibiography of the German-born Dada poet and artist, Baroness Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven.¹ It is a signifi cant achievement. Gammel’s biography is a milestone in the current reassessment of the Baroness² and of the role of women in New York Dada (and in modernism generally); it is also an important contribution to work in several fi elds, including the study of how ideas move from one nation, language, and culture to another. By the early twenties, the Baroness had already become a legendary fi gure in modernist circles. “Paris has had Dada for fi ve years,” John Rodker declared in e Little Review in the summer of , “and we have had Else von Freytag-Loringhoven for quite two years”; he adds: “In Else von In this review article, I shall discuss only Irene Gammel’s Baroness Elsa: Gender, Dada and Everyday Modernity—A Cultural Biography (Cambridge, MA: e MIT Press, . Pp. [hardcover], [paperback]). e Baroness was born Else Plôtz but, as Gammel puts it, she “Americanized” the spelling of her name sometime after her arrival in the United States (xxv). Although most scholars refer to her as “Elsa,” some prefer “Else” and at least one uses “Else” when referring to her German years and “Elsa” when writing of her life in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglophone Modernism [Note: an Asterisked Work Also Appears On
    Anglophone Modernism [Note: An asterisked work also appears on the field list.] Fiction Choose no fewer than 12 novelists, 5 of whom must be represented by more than one work. Thomas Hardy: Tess of the d'Urbervilles (1891) Henry James: "The Turn of the Screw" (1898), "The Beast in the Jungle" (1903) Joseph Conrad: Lord Jim (1899-1900), Heart of Darkness (1903),* The Secret Agent (1907) E.M. Forster: Howards End (1910) Thomas Mann: Death in Venice (1912)* D.H. Lawrence: Women in Love (1913) Marcel Proust: Swann’s Way (1913) Ford Madox Ford: The Good Soldier (1915) Sherwood Anderson: Winesburg Ohio (1919) Jean Toomer: Cane (1923)* Franz Kafka: The Trial (1925) James Joyce: A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man (1916), Ulysses (1922)* Virginia Woolf: The Voyage Out (1915),* Mrs. Dalloway (1925) Ernest Hemingway: In Our Time (1925),* The Sun Also Rises (1926) William Faulkner: Sound and the Fury (1929), As I Lay Dying (1930)* Jean Rhys: Voyage in the Dark (1934) Mulk Raj Anand: Untouchable (1935) Djuna Barnes: Nightwood (1936) Zora Neale Hurston: Their Eyes Were Watching God (1937)* Richard Wright: Native Son (1940)* Ralph Ellison: Invisible Man (1952)* Poetry Choose no fewer than 12 poets, 5 of whom should be represented by a substantial body of work. Baudelaire: Selections from The Flowers of Evil: “To the Reader,” “Correspondences,” “Hymn to Beauty,” “The Jewels,” “Invitation to the Voyage,” “Owls,” “Obsession,” “Landscape,” “The Seven Old Men,” “The Blind,” “To a Woman Passing By,” “Dusk” Thomas Hardy: “Hap” (1898), “Neutral Tones” (1898),
    [Show full text]