DOCSLIB.ORG

CJF J-Talks. Journalism Matters

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CJF J-Talks. Journalism matters. 2016-2017 Year in Review Is Fake News the New Propaganda? June 13, 2017 – Toronto Reference Library, Toronto In conjunction with the Toronto Public Library and the Toronto Star, as part of the Star Talks and CJF J-Talks series. Tim Wu, law professor at Columbia University and author who coined the phrase "net neutrality", and Mathew Ingram, senior writer for Fortune magazine, discuss the blight of fake news with moderator Kathy English, public editor of the Toronto Star. The Media As Opposition: Covering Trump in a Post-Truth Era May 24, 2017 – Roy Thomson Hall, Toronto They are among the world’s most unrelenting truth seekers. In their first live joint appearance, these renowned, award-winning journalists and authors discussed the pressing need to apply constant, critical pressure on an American president who threatens the very fabric of democracy, journalism, civil society and the truth. In this two-part Toronto event, our first discussion featured Amy Goodman, host and executive producer of Democracy Now!; Juan González, co-host of Democracy Now!; Glenn Greenwald, Pulitzer-prize winner and co- founder of The Intercept; Jeremy Scahill, war correspondent and co- founder of The Intercept, and Vicky Mochama, national columnist with Metro News. Their conversation was be moderated by Hannah Sung, video and podcast producer for The Globe and Mail. The second discussion featured Matt Taibbi, author of the recently published Insane Clown President: Dispatches from the 2016 Circus and contributing editor to Rolling Stone, in conversation with David Walmsley, editor-in-chief of The Globe and Mail, on journalism’s response to this ongoing circus and chaotic presidency. What To Be, or Not To Be: The Public Broadcaster’s Dilemma April 20, 2017 – TMX Broadcast Centre, Toronto In an increasingly fractured, crowded and competitive media environment, what is the role of the public broadcaster when it comes to news? How to attract a new generation of audiences and retain existing ones? What experiments bode well for the future of news? This discussion explored the challenges faced by public broadcasters on both sides of the pond, featuring James Harding, director of news and current affairs for the BBC; Jennifer McGuire, general manager and editor-in-chief of CBC News; and Michael Oreskes, senior vice-president of news and editorial director for NPR, in a conversation moderated by Simon Houpt, senior media writer with The Globe and Mail. No Safe Space: Harassment of Women in Media March 7, 2017 – TMX Broadcast Centre, Toronto It is not just Internet trolls. These days, it is often not safe for women to speak up anywhere - online, on air and in print. What can be done about the barrage of intimidation, threats, and abusive comments that seem determined to silence our voices? In the lead up to International Women’s Day, we tackled online harassment against women in media. Manisha Krishnan, senior writer for VICE Canada; Heather Mallick, columnist with the Toronto Star; and Janet McFarland, business reporter with The Globe and Mail, discuss the hazards of being a female journalist online and the policies and resources that can help make newsrooms and online communities welcoming to all. This discussion was moderated by Piya Chattopadhyay, host of CBC Radio’s Out in the Open. Changing the Face of Media February 22, 2017, TD Bank Tower, Toronto Each in their own way and some with greater force than others, these journalists are pushing for a greater diversity of stories and voices across media—both to reflect the greater community and to effect change within it: Desmond Cole, the journalist who shared his personal account of being stopped by police more than 50 times in Toronto Life; Scaachi Koul, the culture writer with BuzzFeed Canada who quit Twitter briefly after facing online backlash to her call-out for diverse writers; Hannah Sung, who co- hosted The Globe and Mail’s podcast Colour Code about race in Canada; and Arti Patel, lifestyle editor with The Huffington Post, who launched Born and Raised, a series featuring experiences shared by second-generation Canadians. Angie Seth, weekend anchor for Global News at 6, moderated this discussion on the actions being taken and the impact they’re having, both in newsrooms and in the greater community. Politics and Democracy in America: Ottawa February 16, 2017 – National Arts Centre Our Toronto event travels to Ottawa! They were the breakout journalism stars of the United States election campaign: Susanne Craig, the New York Times investigative reporter who got the scoop on Donald Trump’s tax returns, and David Fahrenthold, The Washington Post reporter who exposed Trump’s charitable activities. Taking place just weeks after the inauguration of president-elect Donald Trump, David Walmsley, editor-in- chief of The Globe and Mail, moderated this discussion about the mistakes made and the role of the media in these uncertain times. Politics and Democracy in America: Toronto February 15, 2017 – St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts They were the breakout journalism stars of the United States election, journalists whose relentless digging didn’t result in the anticipated outcome: Susanne Craig, the New York Times investigative reporter who got the scoop on Donald Trump’s tax returns; David Fahrenthold, The Washington Post reporter who exposed Trump’s charitable activities, and Daniel Dale, Toronto Star’s Washington bureau chief, who broke new ground in daily fact-checking of Trump’s statements. Taking place just weeks after the inauguration of president-elect Donald Trump, Neil MacDonald, opinion columnist for CBC News, moderated this discussion on mistakes made and the role media needs to play in these uncertain times. Finding A Way Forward: The Changing Ways Canadians Get Their News January 26, 2017 – TMX Broadcast Centre, Toronto How are Canadians getting their news, and whom do they trust to provide it? How do perceptions differ between social media and mainstream news organizations? Does the government have a role in aiding struggling news outlets? The Canadian Journalism Foundation (CJF), in partnership with the Public Policy Forum (PPF), explores Canadians’ attitudes towards the media in a public opinion poll, conducted by Earnscliffe Strategy Group for PPF’s study on News, Democracy, Policy and Truth. To explore what the results mean for the future of news in Canada, Christopher Waddell, associate professor at the School of Journalism and Communication at Carleton University and a member of the CJF Board, spoke with Edward Greenspon, president and CEO of the Public Policy Forum; Allan Gregg, principal with Earnscliffe Strategy Group; and April Lindgren, associate professor at Ryerson University School of Journalism and principal investigator for the Local News Research Project. Digital or Bust? The Future of Magazines November 30, 2016 – TMX Broadcast Centre, Toronto Whether Canadian or American, magazines face a turbulent time negotiating the digital shift. In Canada, Toronto Life celebrates 50 years, The Walrus looks to build on its foundation funding model and Rogers Media is moving towards online-only editions. South of the border, the president of the venerable thinking person's monthly, the 166-year-old Harper’s Magazine, remains firmly committed to the virtues of words on paper. Is this all cause for celebration or despair? Speakers included special guest John R. (Rick) MacArthur, president and publisher of Harper’s Magazine; Sarah Fulford, editor-in-chief of Toronto Life; Jonathan Kay, editor-in-chief of The Walrus, Steve Maich, senior vice-president of digital content and publishing for Rogers Media; and moderator Laas Turnbull, chief audience officer for ZoomerMedia. From the Margins to the Mainstream: What’s Next for Digital Disruptors November 15, 2016 – TMX Broadcast Centre, Toronto Established online in the last decade, they were media's "new kids on the block"—digital disruptors that carved their own niches within the traditional media landscape and were hailed as either saviours or saboteurs: BuzzFeed, with its listicles and viral content; VICE, with its rebel millennial voice and muckraking videos; and Twitter, a platform for citizen journalism, live reporting and feedback, along with free, sharable content. Now with a strong foothold in the Canadian media industry, what are the challenges and obstacles these digital disruptors face? Simon Houpt, senior media writer with The Globe and Mail, moderated this discussion featuring Michael Gruzuk, director of news and digital content for VICE Canada; Jennifer Hollett, head of news and government for Twitter Canada; and Craig Silverman, editor of BuzzFeed Canada. Beyond Missing and Murdered: Covering Indigenous Communities November 3, 2016 – Ryerson University, Toronto It's 2016: Has coverage of Indigenous issues shifted from niche media to the mainstream? In addition to several news organizations’ award-winning reportage on missing and murdered indigenous women, ground-level changes—such as the creation of dedicated beats, units, internships and university courses—are intended to bring greater awareness to the history and challenges faced by the Indigenous community. Does this signal progress and hope for sustained coverage for a community traditionally underserved by the media? Lenny Carpenter, program manager of the Indigenous Reporters Program for Journalists for Human Rights; Karyn Pugliese, executive director of News and Current Affairs for APTN; Tanya Talaga, reporter with the Toronto Star; Connie Walker, investigative reporter for CBC News; and moderator Duncan McCue, host of Cross Country Checkup (CBC Radio One), were in conversation on the state of the media on Indigenous affairs in Canada's new era of truth and reconciliation. Building Bloomberg News October 25, 2016 – TMX Broadcast Centre, Toronto In an era of mounting newsroom cutbacks that threaten quality journalism, Bloomberg News remains a financial and journalistic success story. Matthew Winkler, Bloomberg News co-founder and editor-in-chief emeritus, discussed newsroom budgets, the evolution and ethics of business news and working with Michael Bloomberg to create The Bloomberg Way.
Recommended publications
  • Media Analysis of Julian Assange's Superseding Indictment

    Media Analysis of Julian Assange's Superseding Indictment

    defend.wikileaks.org Media analysis of Julian Assange's superseding indictment The precedent Glenn Greenwald: The indictment of Assange is a blueprint for making journalists into felons The argument offered by both the Trump administration and by some members of the self- styled “resistance” to Trump is, ironically, the same: that Assange isn’t a journalist at all and thus deserves no free press protections. But this claim overlooks the indictment’s real danger and, worse, displays a wholesale ignorance of the First Amendment. Press freedoms belong to everyone, not to a select, privileged group of citizens called “journalists.” Empowering prosecutors to decide who does or doesn’t deserve press protections would restrict “freedom of the press” to a small, cloistered priesthood of privileged citizens designated by the government as “journalists.” The First Amendment was written to avoid precisely that danger. Most critically, the U.S. government has now issued a legal document that formally declares that collaborating with government sources to receive and publish classified documents is no longer regarded by the Justice Department as journalism protected by the First Amendment but rather as the felony of espionage, one that can send reporters and their editors to prison for decades. It thus represents, by far, the greatest threat to press freedom in the Trump era, if not the past several decades. … The vast bulk of activities cited by the indictment as criminal are exactly what major U.S. media outlets do on a daily basis. The indictment, for instance, alleges WikiLeaks “encouraged sources” such as Chelsea Manning to obtain and pass on classified information; that the group provided technical advice on how to obtain and transmit that information without detection, and that it then published the classified information stolen by its source.
  • And Jeremy Scahill (USA) Win Human Rights Award

    And Jeremy Scahill (USA) Win Human Rights Award

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Marina Garde February 9, 2016 [email protected] / www.alba-valb.org Tel. 212-674-5398 Fearless, Border-Crossing Journalists Expose Corruption at the Highest Levels: Lydia Cacho (Mexico) and Jeremy Scahill (USA) Win Human Rights Award New York—On Saturday, May 7, 2016, the Abraham Lincoln Brigade Archives (ALBA) will present the ALBA/Puffin Award for Human Rights Activism to journalists Lydia Cacho and Jeremy Scahill. One of the largest monetary awards for human rights in the world, this $100,000 cash prize is granted annually by ALBA and the Puffin Foundation to honor the International Brigades and connect their inspiring legacy with contemporary causes. “Cacho and Scahill both shine as rare examples of investigative journalists who place human rights at the center of their work,” said ALBA board member and 2012 award recipient Kate Doyle. “Their reporting not only affects government policies, but seeks to champion and protect the lives of the world’s most vulnerable citizens. ALBA is proud to honor them.” Working on both sides of the volatile Mexico-United States border, Lydia Cacho and Jeremy Scahill have dedicated their careers to exposing the corruption, violence and abuse of power which go routinely unchallenged in the mainstream media. Cacho’s and Scahill’s work exemplifies the intersections of expository reporting and human rights activism. Their commitment to breaking the most profound silences has prompted investigations into the United States’ shadow wars across the Middle East and Africa as well as Mexican authorities’ use of censorship, torture and corruption. Part of an initiative designed to sustain the legacy of the experiences, aspirations and idealism of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade, the ALBA/Puffin Award for Human Rights Activism supports current international activists and human rights causes.
  • The Civilian Impact of Drone Strikes

    The Civilian Impact of Drone Strikes

    THE CIVILIAN IMPACT OF DRONES: UNEXAMINED COSTS, UNANSWERED QUESTIONS Acknowledgements This report is the product of a collaboration between the Human Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School and the Center for Civilians in Conflict. At the Columbia Human Rights Clinic, research and authorship includes: Naureen Shah, Acting Director of the Human Rights Clinic and Associate Director of the Counterterrorism and Human Rights Project, Human Rights Institute at Columbia Law School, Rashmi Chopra, J.D. ‘13, Janine Morna, J.D. ‘12, Chantal Grut, L.L.M. ‘12, Emily Howie, L.L.M. ‘12, Daniel Mule, J.D. ‘13, Zoe Hutchinson, L.L.M. ‘12, Max Abbott, J.D. ‘12. Sarah Holewinski, Executive Director of Center for Civilians in Conflict, led staff from the Center in conceptualization of the report, and additional research and writing, including with Golzar Kheiltash, Erin Osterhaus and Lara Berlin. The report was designed by Marla Keenan of Center for Civilians in Conflict. Liz Lucas of Center for Civilians in Conflict led media outreach with Greta Moseson, pro- gram coordinator at the Human Rights Institute at Columbia Law School. The Columbia Human Rights Clinic and the Columbia Human Rights Institute are grateful to the Open Society Foundations and Bullitt Foundation for their financial support of the Institute’s Counterterrorism and Human Rights Project, and to Columbia Law School for its ongoing support. Copyright © 2012 Center for Civilians in Conflict (formerly CIVIC) and Human Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America. Copies of this report are available for download at: www.civiliansinconflict.org Cover: Shakeel Khan lost his home and members of his family to a drone missile in 2010.
  • Debates of the Senate

    Debates of the Senate

    Debates of the Senate 2nd SESSION . 41st PARLIAMENT . VOLUME 149 . NUMBER 26 OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, December 11, 2013 The Honourable NOËL A. KINSELLA Speaker CONTENTS (Daily index of proceedings appears at back of this issue). Debates Services: D'Arcy McPherson, National Press Building, Room 906, Tel. 613-995-5756 Publications Centre: David Reeves, National Press Building, Room 926, Tel. 613-947-0609 Published by the Senate Available on the Internet: http://www.parl.gc.ca 722 THE SENATE Wednesday, December 11, 2013 The Senate met at 1:30 p.m., the Speaker in the chair. practice their independent religion or who are wrongfully convicted, as happened to Mr. Ghassemi-Shall, endure torture to elicit information or confessions, and then trial by a so-called Prayers. ``judiciary'' with virtually no protection of the right to a fair process. VISITORS IN THE GALLERY According to the Iran Human Rights Documentation Centre, The Hon. the Speaker: Honourable senators, I wish to draw over 600 people have been executed in Iran in 2013. Three your attention to the presence in the gallery of Hamid Ghassemi- hundred of those have been sent to their deaths after President Shall and his spouse, Antonella Mega. They are guests of the Rouhani assumed office in August. Since Rouhani's Honourable Senator Frum. inauguration, the number of prisoners being sent to the gallows has accelerated, not decreased. On behalf of all honourable senators, I welcome you to the Senate of Canada. It was during a visit to his mother in 2008 that Hamid Ghassemi-Shall was caught up in an Orwellian nightmare while Hon.
  • Jeremy Scahill: Two Degrees of Separation from the Dirty Wars Dragnet

    Jeremy Scahill: Two Degrees of Separation from the Dirty Wars Dragnet

    JEREMY SCAHILL: TWO DEGREES OF SEPARATION FROM THE DIRTY WARS DRAGNET Congratulations to Jeremy Scahill and the entire team that worked on Dirty Wars for being nominated for the Best Documentary Oscar. This post may appear to be shamelessly opportunistic — exploiting the attention Dirty Wars will get in the days ahead to make a political point before the President endorses the dragnet on Friday — but I’ve been intending to write it since November, when I wrote this post. Jeremy Scahill (and the entire Dirty Wars team) is the kind of person whose contacts and sources are exposed to the government in its dragnet. To write his book (and therefore research the movie, though not all of this shows up in the movie) Scahill spoke with Anwar al-Awlaki’s father (one degree of separation from a terrorist target), a number of people with shifting loyalties in Somalia (who may or may not be targeted), and Afghans we identified as hostile in Afghanistan. All of these people might be targets of our dragnet analysis (and remember — there is a far looser dragnet of metadata collected under EO 12333, with fewer protections). Which puts Scahill, probably via multiple channels, easily within 3 degrees of separation of targets that might get him exposed to further network analysis. (Again, if these contacts show up in 12333 collection Scahill would be immediately exposed to that kind of datamining; if it shows up in the Section 215 dragnet, it would happen if his calls got dumped into the Corporate Store.) If Scahill got swept up in the dragnet on a first or second hop, it means all his other sources, including those within government (like the person depicted in the trailer above) describing problems with the war they’ve been asked to fight, might be identified too.
  • Jeremy Scahill Shaun King

    Jeremy Scahill Shaun King

    JEREMY SCAHILL &SHAUN KING “Reporting on Racial Conflict at Home and Wars Abroad in Wed, March 28, 2018 6:15 - 8 p.m. the Age of Trump” College Avenue Academic Moderated by Building, Room 2400 Juan González, Professor of Professional 15 Seminary Place, Practice, School of Communication and New Brunswick, NJ Information, and co-host of Democracy Now Jeremy Scahill is an investigative reporter, war correspon- dent, and author of the international bestseller Blackwater: The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army. He has reported from armed conflicts around the world, including Af- ghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Yemen, Nigeria, and the former Yugo- slavia. He is a two-time winner of the prestigious George Polk Award and produced and wrote the movie Dirty Wars, a doc- umentary that premiered at the 2013 Sundance Film Festival and was nominated for an Academy Award. He is one of the founding editors of the investigative news site The Intercept, where he also hosts the popular weekly podcast Intercepted. In addition, Scahill is the national security correspondent for The Nation and for Democracy Now. Shaun King is nationally known as a civil rights and Black Lives Matter activist, and as an innovator in the use of social media for political change. He currently works as a columnist for The Intercept, where he writes about racial justice, mass incarceration, human rights, and law enforcement misconduct. He has been a senior justice writer at New York’s Daily News, a commentator for The Young Turks and the Tom Joyner Show, a contributing writer to Daily Kos, and a writer-in-residence at Harvard Law School’s Fair Punishment Project.
  • Chilling Effects on Free Expression: Surveillance, Threats and Harassment

    Chilling Effects on Free Expression: Surveillance, Threats and Harassment

    chapter 16 Chilling Effects on Free Expression: Surveillance, Threats and Harassment Elisabeth Eide Professor of Journalism Studies, Oslo Metropolitan University Abstract: This chapter addresses global surveillance as revealed by Edward Snowden in 2013 and discusses the effects such surveillance – and indeed its revelation – may have on freedom of the press and investigative journalism. The chilling effect – an act of discouragement – has proven to be an effective way of deterring public intel- lectuals and other citizens from voicing their opinions in the public sphere. This chapter presents some examples of how it works on practicing freedom of expres- sion for both groups and individuals, as well as how it may affect relationships between various actors in the public sphere, particularly the state and the media, and journalists/writers and politicians. Finally, it discusses consequences for the future of investigative journalism. Keywords: chilling effect, investigative journalism, surveillance, freedom of expression Rarely it is mentioned, in this regard, that surveillance fundamentally questions journalistic work as such – at least in its form of investigative journalism that requires confidential communication with sources. —Arne Hintz (2013) Introduction This chapter addresses the chilling effect on freedom of expression and free- dom of the press. As a case study, it discusses how investigative journalism, Citation: Eide, E. (2019). Chilling Effects on Free Expression: Surveillance, Threats and Harassment. In R. Krøvel & M. Thowsen (Eds.),Making Transparency Possible. An Interdisciplinary Dialogue (pp. 227–242). Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk. https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.64.ch16 License: CC BY-NC 4.0 227 chapter 16 revealing modern global surveillance helped by whistleblower Edward Snowden (in June 2013), may be hampered by this effect, oftentimes in the form of a tight relationship between state power and the media.
  • Table of Contents

    Table of Contents

    TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CHRETIEN LEGACY Introduction .................................................. i The Chr6tien Legacy R eg W hitaker ........................................... 1 Jean Chr6tien's Quebec Legacy: Coasting Then Stickhandling Hard Robert Y oung .......................................... 31 The Urban Legacy of Jean Chr6tien Caroline Andrew ....................................... 53 Chr6tien and North America: Between Integration and Autonomy Christina Gabriel and Laura Macdonald ..................... 71 Jean Chr6tien's Continental Legacy: From Commitment to Confusion Stephen Clarkson and Erick Lachapelle ..................... 93 A Passive Internationalist: Jean Chr6tien and Canadian Foreign Policy Tom K eating ......................................... 115 Prime Minister Jean Chr6tien's Immigration Legacy: Continuity and Transformation Yasmeen Abu-Laban ................................... 133 Renewing the Relationship With Aboriginal Peoples? M ichael M urphy ....................................... 151 The Chr~tien Legacy and Women: Changing Policy Priorities With Little Cause for Celebration Alexandra Dobrowolsky ................................ 171 Le Petit Vision, Les Grands Decisions: Chr~tien's Paradoxical Record in Social Policy M ichael J. Prince ...................................... 199 The Chr~tien Non-Legacy: The Federal Role in Health Care Ten Years On ... 1993-2003 Gerard W . Boychuk .................................... 221 The Chr~tien Ethics Legacy Ian G reene ..........................................
  • The News Media and Manufacturing Consent in the 21St Century | Matt

    The News Media and Manufacturing Consent in the 21St Century | Matt

    The News Media and Manufacturing Consent in the 21st Century | Matt Taibbi As news reporting becomes more politicized, more negativistic, less trustworthy, February 18th, 2019 and generally more of a headache to digest, people increasingly are going to turn to narrative as a source of information. ― Matt Taibbi INTRODUCTION Matt Taibbi is a contributing editor for Rolling Stone and winner of the 2008 National Magazine Award for columns and commentary. His most recent book is ‘I Can’t Breathe: A Killing on Bay Street,’ about the infamous killing of Eric Garner by the New York City police. He’s also the author of the New York Times bestsellers 'Insane Clown President,' 'The Divide,' 'Griftopia,' and 'The Great Derangement.' WHY DO I CARE? For someone who has made his career working in and around media – first, on the application development/UI side and later, on the content and editorial side – I have been impressed by how long the legacy industry has struggled to keep up with the disruptive forces of innovation wrought by the Web (blogs, in particular), Google (YouTube included), Apple (podcasting, in particular), and the large social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, etc.). Although Craig’s List, Monster.com, and other online list boards were the first to really attack the business-side of the news industry (print media, primarily), it was blog software that commoditized journalism and created the first real, online market for alternative news and information. YouTube Media - began to do the same for the broadcast and cable news markets, and now podcasts are disrupting everything by taking attention away from written, as well as motion content, particularly for long- Multi form, in-depth material.
  • Women and the Equality Deficit: the Impact of Restructuring Canada's Social Programs

    Women and the Equality Deficit: the Impact of Restructuring Canada's Social Programs

    Women and the Equality Deficit: The Impact of Restructuring Canada’s Social Programs Shelagh Day Gwen Brodsky The research and publication of this study were funded by Status of Women Canada’s Policy Research Fund. This document expresses the views and opinions of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official policy or opinion of Status of Women Canada or the Government of Canada. March 1998 PREFACE Status of Women Canada’s Policy Research Fund was instituted in 1996 to support independent, nationally relevant policy research on gender equality issues. In order to determine the structure and priorities of the Policy Research Fund, Status of Women Canada held consultations from March to May 1996 with a range of national, regional and local women’s organizations, researchers and research organizations, community, social service and professional groups, other levels of government, and individuals interested in women’s equality. Consultation participants indicated their support for the Fund to address both long-term emerging policy issues as well as urgent issues, and recommended that a small, non-governmental external committee would play a key role in identifying priorities, selecting research proposals for funding, and exercising quality control over the final research papers. As an interim measure during the fiscal year 1996-1997, consulation participants agreed that short-term research projects addressing immediate needs should be undertaken while the external committee was being established to develop longer-term priorities. In this context, policy research on issues surrounding the Canada Health and Social Transfer (CHST) and access to justice were identified as priorities. On June 21, 1996, a call for research proposals on the impact of the CHST on women was issued.
  • Judy and Peter Went to Ottawa

    Judy and Peter Went to Ottawa

    Judy and Peter Went to Ottawa by Edward Greenspon Globe and Mail Focus February 11, 1995 Ottawa Back in Grade 12 in Annapolis Royal Regional Academy, a boy named Pete sat in the third row right behind a girl named Judy. They were two gifted students attending a small school on the edge of Nova Scotia’s Annapolis Valley. And for the five years after Judy moved to town in Grade 8 until their graduation in 1960, they had each other to provide a handy gauge of their progress. In a word, they competed, in the finest sense of the word. Today, Peter Nicholson, 52, and Judith Maxwell, 51, are two of the most influential thinkers in Ottawa, members of the select group of people who provide the intellectual fodder off which governments feed. They occupy that critical middle ground between academe and politics, linking the world of ideas to the world of action. What they think matters. What they think also differs. Mr. Nicholson is still very much the son of a former provincial Liberal finance minister. Ms. Maxwell is very much the daughter of an Anglican clergyman. In terms of the current Liberal government in Ottawa, they could be stand-ins for Paul Martin and Lloyd Axworthy - the fiscal conscience and social conscience. “I guess you can say they are the two wings of Liberalism,” remarks Canadian Labour Congress economist Andrew Jackson. Mr. Nicholson is right in the thick of the action, as the personal guru to Finance Minister Paul Martin. The two men have known each other since they attended periodic policy-wonk weekends in 1979 organized by former Liberal cabinet minister Hugh Faulkner.
  • AP US Government & Politics

    AP US Government & Politics

    AP US Government & Politics Summer Assignment Welcome to AP US Government & Politics Course. To prepare for class, you are required to do the following things over the summer: I) Follow a reputable news source over the summer to keep current on political issues. We will frequently be making ​ connections to current events. Some news sources you may wish to utilize are: C-Span, Roll Call, CNN, NY Times, Washington Post or The Hill. Many students have added one of these sources as apps to their phone to stay current. AND II) Read a politically related book and do a summary and reflection. A. Choose any book from the list on the reverse side! ​ B. Check to see if the book listed below is available in a library before buying them. C. Refer to the instructions for directions. Book Review Instructions Your book review should be typed, and include detailed responses and citations for the Reflection & Evaluation part. Your overall summary should be no longer than 3 pages double spaced and answer all the questions listed below. Include at the top of the first page a basic bibliographical citation: Author, title, place and date of ​ ​ publication along with your name and teacher’s name. *Make sure you include detailed examples and cite the book (using page numbers when necessary) as you respond to the questions listed below. 1. REFLECTION based on 5 separate quotes from the book. After reading you should have 5 ​ statements/quotes you would like to respond to. The reflection should include an interpretation of what the author is saying as well as your personal response.