Policy Agenda of the Greenland Home Rule

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Policy Agenda of the Greenland Home Rule PROGRAMMING DOCUMENT FOR THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF GREENLAND 2014-2020 (2014/137/EU) SIGNATURE OF THE PROGRAMMING DOCUMENT FOR THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF GREENLAND The Government of Greenland and the European Commission hereby agree as follows: (1) The Government of Greenland and the European Commission held discussions in 2013 and 2014 with a view to determining the general orientations for cooperation for the sustainable development of Greenland from 2014 to 2020. In the course of these discussions, the Programming Document for the Sustainable Development of Greenland was drawn up in accordance with Council Decision 2014/137/EU of 14 March 2014 and Regulation (EU) 236/2014 of the European Parliament and the Council of the 11 March 2014 laying down the rules and procedures for the implementation of the Union’s instruments for financing external action. (2) The agreement of the Government of Greenland and the European Commission on the Programming Document for the Sustainable Development of Greenland completes the programming process referred to in Article 4 of Council Decision 2014/137/EU of 14 March 2014. Done at on the For the Government of Greenland, For the European Commission, 1 Executive summary Greenland is a self-governing territory in the Kingdom of Denmark ruled by the Government of Greenland, Naalakkersuisut (hereinafter “the Government”). The 21st of June 2009 the Act of Greenland Self-Government entered into force replacing the Greenland Home Rule Act of 1979. This changed the constitutional status of Greenland within the Kingdom of Denmark and inter alia defined the natural resources of Greenland as being the property of the Greenlandic people. Being a part of the European Community since 1973, through Danish Membership, Greenland formally withdrew from the European Community in 1985. Subsequently, a Treaty on Greenland’s withdrawal from the Community was made declaring Greenland as a “special case”, following which Greenland became associated to the Community as an Overseas Country1. Greenland is a territory remote from the EU, with a small population of 56,370 (2013) on the world’s largest island facing challenging climatic conditions and a particular social and economic situation, as well as a cultural mix resulting from its past and present relationship with Denmark. Greenland’s economy is characterised by a very large and predominant public sector. Fisheries and fishing industries dominate export, and there is a developing private sector which includes international mining- and oil companies. The public finances are highly dependent on the block grant allocated by Denmark as well as the association of Greenland with the EU. Following general elections in March 2013, a new government coalition was inaugurated in April 2013. Subsequently, the plan for the sustainable development of the economy and society along with specific sectoral strategies for the different underlying economic sectors are currently under revision by the Government. The Government has presented its Political Economic Report at the spring session of the Parliament in 2014. The long term economic policy is to have a self-sustained economy and to phase out the annual block grant from Denmark. This presupposes fiscal sustainability, diversification of the economy and real economic growth. There is broad political consensus that education and training is fundamental in achieving these long term sustainable economic developmental goals. From 2007 to 2013 the Government and the EU have gained valuable knowledge on the education and training sector, which was the focal sector for financial 1 At that time, the association was in accordance with Part IV of the Treaty Establishing the European Economic Community. Currently the legislative basis is Part IV of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. 2 cooperation on the basis of the Programming Document for the Sustainable Development of Greenland, agreed upon between the EU, Greenland and Denmark. The Government has focused on education and training since 2004, which has been reflected in an increase in the budget for education and training from 14.8% of the Government budget in 2005 to 18.2% of the Government budget in 2013. Moreover, the Parliament in 2006 adopted the Greenland Education Programme which contained an overall education and training strategy covering the period until 2020. In 2013 a revised education strategy was adopted by the Government. The Education Strategy and the Education Plan II comprising the Greenland Education Programme phase 2 will be handed out at the spring session of the Parliament in 2014. There is a broad political consensus on the vital importance of education as being the most relevant growth parameter for any future prosperity in the societal development of the country. In general there is a need for an educated Greenlandic workforce in every economic sector. The focus on human capital is predominant and both the public and the private sector are devoting much attention to developing and maintaining its human resource capital. In view of the above, education and training is selected as the focal sector for financial cooperation between the EU and Greenland outside fisheries. According to the Council Decision on relations between the EU on the one hand and Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark on the other (2014/137/EU)2, EU financial assistance should be provided mainly through budget support, taking into account Greenland’s sound macroeconomic policy and public finance management. In the first phase of the Greenland Education Programme (2007-2013), emphasis was put on vocational training, the acquisition of real qualifications for jobs requiring skilled persons and real competence courses for unskilled persons. In the second phase (2014-2020) emphasis will be put on the pre-school and elementary school system besides a continuation of the support for vocational education and training and the post-elementary school system in general. 2 OJ L 76, 15.03.2014, p.1 3 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................ 4 PART A. COOPERATION STRATEGY .............................................................................................................. 6 1. EU cooperation objectives ............................................................................................................... 6 2. Policy agenda of the Government ................................................................................................... 7 2.1. Overall policy ........................................................................................................................... 7 2.2. Arctic issues ............................................................................................................................. 8 2.3. Fisheries ................................................................................................................................... 9 2.4. Social sector ........................................................................................................................... 10 2.5. Labour Market ....................................................................................................................... 10 2.6. Mineral Resources ................................................................................................................. 11 2.7. Tourism .................................................................................................................................. 12 2.8. Climate and Energy ................................................................................................................ 13 2.9. Environment .......................................................................................................................... 15 2.10. Biodiversity ........................................................................................................................ 15 2.11. Food safety ........................................................................................................................ 17 2.12. Sustainable Development .................................................................................................. 17 2.13. Education ........................................................................................................................... 19 3. Assessment of the political, economic and social situation .......................................................... 22 3.1. Political situation ................................................................................................................... 22 3.2. Economic situation ................................................................................................................ 23 3.3. Social situation....................................................................................................................... 25 3.4. Environmental situation ........................................................................................................ 27 3.5. Public finance management .................................................................................................. 27 4. Lessons Learned ............................................................................................................................ 28 4.1. Financial cooperation 2007-2013 .........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Download Download
    h ps://doi.org/10.22584/nr45.2017.006 PoliƟ cal-Economic Indicators for Self-Sustainability in Greenland Chris an Wennecke Greenland Business Abstract: This ar cle contributes to policy learning in Greenland by linking entrepreneurship and innova on system theory to recent and former a empts at crea ng poli cal-economic indicators. The ar cle shows how working methods have developed within the Greenland government where evidence-based governance is becoming more commonly used. The main fi ndings indicate that the overall poli cal objec ve of crea ng a self-sustaining economy is not possible in the short run, but is a poli cally meaningful overall goal. Exis ng measurements and indicators have been important instruments in developing an understanding of the connectedness of elements in the innova on system. Measurements and indicators could s ll be developed further, especially by extending with more individual level data that can be analyzed within the context of ins tu onal level data. Also, the natural resource sectors need to be thought about in connec on to other industries and the competencies of the popula on in order to avoid a resource curse. This could very well be done in a cross-sec onal innova on policy, perhaps including an indicator for ”self-sustainability,” and combined with measuring the actual development in comparison with the set goals. The Northern Review 45 (2017): 93–111 Published by Yukon College, Whitehorse, Canada 93 1. Introduction Greenland is an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark and has a colonial history that goes back 300 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism & Quality of Life in Greenland
    Tourism & Quality of Life in Greenland: Exploration through Farm Stays in South Greenlandic Settlements Naja Carina Steenholdt & Daniela Chimirri Studies of how the development of industries impacts resident quality of life in Greenland have largely focused on fisheries and mining, neglecting the emerging tourism industry in the country. In this article, we aim to contribute to the reduction of this gap within academia and praxis by exploring how the developing tourism industry in South Greenland interrelates with resident quality of life in this area. Based on the lack of existing academic literature and public awareness within tourism and quality of life in South Greenland, we investigate the relevance of the tourism industry, specifically farm tourism, effect on resident quality of life. Through a small-scale exploratory case study of farm stays in South Greenlandic settlements, we aim to create an understanding of how resident quality of life and farm tourism interrelates. By applying the bottom-up spillover theory as theoretical frame, we investigate whether generated income from farm tourism can contribute to people’s state of wellbeing, but also that there is more to wellbeing than “just” money. Based on generated data, our study concludes that there is a close interrelation between farm tourism and resident QoL in South Greenland. Subsequently, we argue that there are relevant grounds in a larger perspective for further research within the field of tourism and QoL in Greenland. Introduction The increasing amount of debates in Greenland, centering on economic growth, reflects the widespread acknowledgement of its essentiality for the welfare state as such as well as on the way to independence from Denmark.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Scale Projects in the Arctic: Socio-Economic Impacts of Mining in Greenland
    University of Akureyri School of Humanities and Social Science, Faculty of Law Master‟s Program in Polar Law Large Scale Projects in the Arctic: Socio-economic impacts of mining in Greenland Monika Margrét Stefánsdóttir June 2014 University of Akureyri School of Humanities and Social Science, Faculty of Law Master‟s Program in Polar Law Large Scale Projects in the Arctic: Socio-economic impacts of mining in Greenland Monika Margrét Stefánsdóttir Master thesis submitted as part of studies for the M.A. – Degree in Polar Law. Akureyri June 2014 Master Thesis Monika Margrét Stefánsdóttir Ha070314 Large Scale Projects in the Arctic: Socio-economic impacts of mining in Greenland Joan Nymand Larsen: is hereby approved as part of studies towards the M.A. degree in Polar Law Studies Akureyri in June 2014 Master Degree Examination Committee Members _______________________________________ Joan Nymand Larsen _______________________________________ Hjalti Jóhannesson iii Abstract Changes in the Arctic environment in the last decades are highly relevant to understanding changes in the socio-economic development in the Arctic. The main focus of this thesis will be on those changes, with a certain concentration on the changes in relation to Greenland. The thesis starts out by providing an overview of the physical and historical background of Greenland, followed by an overview of the economy of Greenland and a discussion of the obstacles for economic development. With Self-Government, Greenland is looking for new sources of income. The importance of the mineral sector has grown as it begins to show its potential as this new source. Case studies of four different mines, in three different countries, along with large scale projects in four different countries will be analysed and compared.
    [Show full text]
  • Driving Forces in the Greenlandic Urbanization
    View metadata,Downloaded citation and from similar orbit.dtu.dk papers on:at core.ac.uk Dec 20, 2017 brought to you by CORE provided by Online Research Database In Technology Driving forces in the Greenlandic urbanization Hendriksen, Kåre Published in: Proceedings of Artek Event 2014 Publication date: 2014 Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Hendriksen, K. (2014). Driving forces in the Greenlandic urbanization. In Proceedings of Artek Event 2014 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Driving forces in the Greenlandic urbanization Kåre Hendriksen The Arctic Technology Centre, Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark. DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark Speaker, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Generally urbanization is recognised as a natural development where the population is mowing into the larger towns driven by e.g. better job opportunities, larger product and service supply and better education and health services, and it is often argued that this is also the driving forces for accelerating changes in the Greenlandic settlement pattern.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Economy of Northern Regional Development
    The Political Economy of Northern Regional Development Vol. I Gorm Winther, Gérard Duhaime, Jack Kruse, Chris Southcott, Hans Aage, Ivar Jonsson, Lyudmila Zalkind, Iulie Aslaksen, Solveig Glomsröd, Anne Ingeborg Myhr, Hugo Reinert, Svein Mathiesen, Erik Reinert, Joan Nymand Larsen, Rasmus Ole Rasmussen, Andrée Caron, Birger Poppel, Jón Haukur Ingimundarson (in order of appearance) TemaNord 2010:521 The Political Economy of Northern Regional Development Vol. I TemaNord 2010:521 © Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen 2010 ISBN 978-92-893-2016-0 Print: Scanprint as Cover photo: Gorm Winther Copies: 430 Printed on environmentally friendly paper .This publication can be ordered on www.norden.org/order. Other Nordic publications are available at www.norden.org/publications This publication has been published with financial support by the Nordic Council of Ministers. But the con- tents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views, policies or recommendations of the Nordic Council of Ministers. “This project was conducted as part of the International Polar Year 2007–2008, which was sponsored by the International Council for Science and the World. Meteorological Organisation. The project was cofinanced by the Commission for Social Scientific Research in Greenland, the Department for Planning, Innovation and Management, Denmarks Technical University, the Department for Environmental, Social and Spatial Change, University of Roskilde and the Department of Development and Planning, University of Aalborg.” Printed in Denmark Nordic Council of Ministers Nordic Council Store Strandstræde 18 Store Strandstræde 18 DK-1255 Copenhagen K DK-1255 Copenhagen K Phone (+45) 3396 0200 Phone (+45) 3396 0400 Fax (+45) 3396 0202 Fax (+45) 3311 1870 www.norden.org Nordic co-operation Nordic co-operation is one of the world’s most extensive forms of regional collaboration, involv- ing Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and three autonomous areas: the Faroe Islands, Greenland, and Åland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economy of Greenland 2013
    The Economic Council Aningaasaqarnermut Siunnersuisoqatigiit The Economy of Greenland 2013 Economic Outlook Public Finances Migration The Economic Council was set up by Naalakkersuisut (the Government of Greenland) in 2009; this is the Council's fourth report. The Economic Council is headed by a chairmanship of six people. This Chairmanship is composed of a Chairman, a Vice Chairman and four Council members, all of whom are appointed by Naalakkersuisut. Since publication of the last report, one of the posts has been replaced. Tønnes Berthelsen has joined as a Council member to replace Palle Høy. In addition to the Chairmanship, the Economic Council comprises members from interest organisations, the Naalakkersuisut administration, and research institutions. Members representing organisations and research institutions are appointed by the organisations concerned. The other members are appointed by Naalakkersuisut. The members of the Council can submit comments on the content of this report, but the Chairmanship has sole responsibility for the final content. The secretariat function for the Council is carried out jointly by the Ministry of Finance and Danmarks Nationalbank. The task of the Economic Council is to carry out regular assessments of economic trends and of the sustainability of Greenland’s economic policy. The Chairmanship comprises: Chairman: Torben M. Andersen Professor in economics at Aarhus University and former chairman of the Taxes and Welfare Commission. From 2001 to 2003 he was Chairman of the Danish Economic Council, and he is still active in the Council as a specialist expert. Vice Chairman: Ulla Lynge Ulla Lynge has an MSc in Public Administration from the University of Greenland and she is a director on the Sermersooq Business Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Does an Alternative Perspective of Imaging Capture Additional
    Does an alternative perspective of imaging capture additional information on benthic habitats and the impacts of otter trawling at the shrimp fishery site of West Greenland’s continental shelf? Jack Davies1 Supervisor: Chris Yesson2 MRes, Biodiversity, Evolution and Conservation Course: BIOSG095 Keywords: Imaging; video; benthic habitats; trawling; shrimp 1University College London, London, England, London WC1E 6BT 2 Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY Journal Style: ICES Journal of Marine Science Abstract Previous studies on the effects of otter trawling on benthic habitats on West Greenland’s continental shelf have used a drop-down camera to photograph the seafloor at a perpendicular angle. This method is not suitable for capturing larger benthic organisms which are, therefore, not accurately represented in the analysis from those studies. This study used a GoPro positioned at a higher elevation to the drop-cam to capture wider-angled images at the same sites used during the final 1 ½ years of the previous study. Multidimensional scaling models and univariate linear models were used to analyse the similarities and differences between the two imaging methods according to class abundance of each taxon per site. Of 46 sites and 46,000 observations, MDS plots exhibited clear groupings between GoPro and drop-cam data while combined data revealed trawling distance as a significant influence on taxa abundance and diversity in line with current literature. The GoPro camera had a sampling bias for larger macro fauna while drop-cam images were biased for microfauna taxa by excluding the larger macrofauna more at risk from trawling.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenland: the Challenge of Managing a Key Geostrategic Territory
    DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT 2014 IN DEPTH ANALYSIS Greenland: The challenge of managing a key geostrategic territory Author: Fernando GARCÉS DE LOS FAYOS Abstract Greenland’s geostrategic location will grow in importance in the coming years – and not only because the island’s melting ice sheet lies at the forefront of climate change concerns. After acquiring home rule status from Denmark in 1979, Greenland’s 2009 Self- Government Act substantially increased its powers, including the management of its substantial untapped natural resources. Despite the difficulties inherent in exploiting these resources, they have already attracted international attention, notably from Asian countries. Although Greenland is still heavily dependent on an annual grant from Copenhagen, the territory will probably become self-sustainable in the medium term. Its sparse population faces a challenge in administering the huge territory. Elections in March 2013 focused mainly on the conditions for implementing large mining and industrial projects in the future and their effects on the Inuit way of life. The vote returned the Siumut party to power, with Greenland’s first female Prime Minister, Aleqa Hammond. Greenland is the only territory to have withdrawn from the European Union, but it remains one of the EU's Overseas Countries and Territories, closely tied to the Union through an extensive partnership agreement and a fisheries protocol. Greenland is also a focus of the EU’s Arctic policy. DG EXPO/B/PolDep/Note/2014_16 March 2014 PE 522.332 EN Policy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies This In depth analysis was requested by the European Parliament's Enlargement and European Economic Area Unit AUTHOR: Fernando GARCÉS DE LOS FAYOS Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union Policy Department WIB 06 M 077 rue Wiertz 60 B-1047 Brussels Editorial Assistant: Györgyi MÁCSAI CONTACT: Feedback of all kinds is welcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenland.Pdf
    Greenland: Security Perspectives Jørgen Taagholt Jens Claus Hansen translated by Daniel Lufkin he Atlantic Treaty Association was established in 1950 as a group of former Opposition Members Tand politicians from parties backing NATO membership: Social Democrats, Conservative People’s Party and the Left Party. The goal of the Atlantic Treaty Association is to foster understanding of Danish mem- bership in NATO and to advocate political, economic and cultural cooperation among the member nations. Primary emphasis in the activities of the Atlantic Treaty Association is on: • Cooperation with the Baltic states and the Central and Eastern European nations • Activities with young people interested in Danish security policy • Seminars and study tours for teachers from high schools and other educational institutions • Publication of timely articles. In informational and educational activities, we em- phasize: • European security—including the expansion of the EU in depth and breadth; • The role of the United States in European security policy; • The work of NATO and the EU—looking into the future. The Atlantic Treaty Association is a private, voluntary organization whose work is financed from public and private funds. Greenland: Security Perspectives Jørgen Taagholt Jens Claus Hansen translated by Daniel Lufkin Translated from the Danish by Daniel Lufkin. This book may be cited as: Taagholt, Jørgen, and Hansen, Jens Claus. 2001. Greenland: Security Perspectives. Trans. Daniel Lufkin. Fairbanks, Alaska: Arctic Research Consortium of the United States. This report is published by ARCUS with funding provided by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Arctic Social Sciences Program under cooperative agreement OPP-9727899. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Council Report 2020
    Greenland's Economy Autumn 2020 • Economic outlook • Economic policy • The public sector The Economic Council of Greenland The Economic Council was appointed by the Government of Greenland in 2009. The Economic Council is headed by a chairmanship of six persons. The chairmanship consists of a Chair, Vice Chair and four other members, all appointed by the Government. Apart from the chairmanship, the Economic Council consists of members of stakeholder organisations, the Government's administration service and scientific institutions. Members representing organisations and scientific institutions are appointed by the relevant organisations. Other members are appointed by the Government. Council Members may comment on the content of the Report, but the chairmanship alone bears ultimate responsibility for compiling the report and for its final content. The secretariat function for the Economic Council is provided by the Ministry of Finance. The Economic Council's duties consist of making regular appraisals of the state of the economy and the sustainability of the fiscal policies pursued. The Economic Council's chairmanship: Torben M. Andersen, PhD. Chair of the Economic Council. Professor of economics at Aarhus University and former chairman of the Taxes and Welfare Commission. He was chief economic adviser to the Danish Economic Council between 2001 and 2003, and is still active as an expert adviser. Ulla Lynge, MSc in Public Administration from the University of Greenland Vice Chair of the Economic Council. Head of the Secretariat, CSR Greenland and has previously worked for the Government of Greenland, the Municipality of Nuuk, Sermersooq Business Council and the pension fund SISA. Anders Blaabjerg is Chief Statistician at Statistics Greenland and has an MSc-equivalent in Economics.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Development of Greenland in the Context of Its Way to Independence
    Studia i Materiały. Miscellanea Oeconomicae Rok 18, Nr 2/2014 Wydział Zarządzania i Administracji Uniwersytetu Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcach The Arctic and Nordic Countries in the World of Economyand Politics Magdalena Tomala 1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF GREENLAND IN THE CONTEXT OF ITS WAY TO INDEPENDENCE Introduction In the Inuit language Greenland means Kalaallit Nunaat, that is the Land of Greenlanders. Although the indigenous people have inhabited the island for at least 4 thousand years, they still have not managed to achieve independence from Denmark. Since the late eighteenth century their territory has been part of the Kingdom of Denmark, which makes it an autonomous country within the Kingdom, whose head is the Danish Queen Margrethe II. Greenland has enjoyed autonomy since 1979. Also its way to independence is quite long. Most local politicians call for full independence. It is generally known, however, that in the near future Greenland will not proclaim full independence, especially taking into account the period of 30 years that it took to move from Home Rule to Self Rule. Although before the referendum held in 2009 the then Prime Minister of Greenland Hans Enoksen said that the aim of his government was achieving full independence by 2021, the foreign minister of the government Kuupik Kleist - Per Berthelsen was not so optimistic about the issue, determining the period of at least 20-30 years. Also Greenland’s deputy, Palle Christstensen from the Democrats (a group, which is skeptical of the idea of the independence of the island) claimed that “we will not do without Danish subsidies, so we can not give them up now.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Aspects of Colonization and the Post-Colonial Period in Green- Land 1721 to 2014
    Vol. 10 • No. 2 • 2016 Published by Umeå University & The Royal Skyttean Society Umeå 2017 The Journal of Northern Studies is published with support from The Royal Skyttean Society and Umeå University © The authors and Journal of Northern Studies ISSN 1654-5915 Cover picture Scandinavia Satellite and sensor: NOAA, AVHRR Level above earth: 840 km Image supplied by METRIA, a division of Lantmäteriet, Sweden. www.metria.se NOAA®. ©ESA/Eurimage 2001. ©Metria Satellus 2001 Design and layout Lotta Hortéll och Leena Hortéll, Ord & Co i Umeå AB Fonts: Berling Nova and Futura Paper: CT+ 300 gr and Pro Design 100 gr Printed by UmU-Tryckservice, Umeå University Contents / Sommaire / Inhalt Editors & Editorial board ................................................................................................................5 Articles / Aufsätze Per Axelsson, Tahu Kukutai & Rebecca Kippen, Indigenous Wellbeing and Colonisation. Editorial .................................................................................................................. 7 Ian Pool, Māori Health, Colonization and Post-Colonization. Aotearoa New Zealand, from 1769. .19 Ketil Lenert Hansen, Stephen James Minton, Oddgeir Friborg & Tore Sørlie, Discrimination amongst Arctic Indigenous Sami and Non-Sami Populations in Norway. The SAMINOR 2 Questionnaire Study ............................................................ 45 Peter Bjerregaard & Christina Viskum Lytken Larsen, Health Aspects of Colonization and the Post-Colonial Period in Greenland 1721 to 2014 .........................85
    [Show full text]