sign in sign up
<<
Home , Cultural icon, Marilyn (opera), Marilyn Monroe

FFC 4 (2+3) pp. 121–143 Intellect Limited 2015

Film, & Consumption Volume 4 Numbers 2 & 3 © 2015 Intellect Ltd Editorial. English language. doi: 10.1386/ffc.4.2-3.121_2

EDITORIAL

LUCY BOLTON Queen Mary University of London

#Marilyneveryday: The persistence of Monroe as a cultural icon

In April 2015 I was travelling in Istanbul and, on leaving the Grand Bazaar 1. Food stylist is Claire through the Spice Market, I walked out into a side street of shops and cafes. I Clark, and props stylist is listed as Sue was immediately struck by an accessories shop, the hoarding for which was a Rowlands. huge image of ’s face, wearing some just-discernible dangling star earrings (Figure 1). Alongside this image was a series of other photographs, some featuring accessories such as pearls (Figure 2), but the overarching attrac- tion was Monroe’s face. Not long after this, in my local coffee shop, I came across a photographic illustration of a recipe for macarons in a cookery book called Indulge (C. Clark, 2007). Upon closer inspection, I realized that the macarons had been strategi- cally arranged over the famous photograph of Monroe holding a rose (Figure 3). These macarons were side-on, covering her eyes, aligned – or juxtaposed – with her mouth, resembling lips, and perhaps suggesting breasts. Her face, and her eyes, could not be seen. The pale, luxurious indulgence of the Beaton image of Monroe was sufficient, at least in the mind of the food and props stylist, to convey the requisite degree of indulgence to set off these confections: displayed as all edible and ripe for devouring with delectation.1 These encounters with the images of Monroe, totally divorced from her film work, being used in the selling of products, aspirations and concepts,

121

FFC_4.2&3_Editorial_121-143.indd 121 6/6/16 11:17 AM Lucy Bolton

Figures 1 and 2: Marilyn Monroe advertises accessories in Istanbul, April 2015. Photo: Lucy Bolton.

Figure 3: Monroe as a backdrop for macarons (Clark 2007). Photo: Lucy Bolton.

122

FFC_4.2&3_Editorial_121-143.indd 122 6/6/16 11:17 AM #Marilyneveryday

drove home to me how ubiquitous the Monroe image is. Having taught a 2. There is a Harpers Bazaar article class on film stardom for over ten years, I find that each year students are considering ten well acquainted with the image of Monroe in the white halter-neck dress over actresses who have the subway grating, even though only a handful of them will have seen any played Monroe on film http://www. Monroe film, let alone (Wilder, 1955). (If they have seen harpersbazaar.com/ one, it is likely to have been [1959].) /film-tv/g5775/ There is an instance of the image of Monroe not being instantly recog- actresses-who-played- marilyn-monroe/; also nized. The famous Bert Stern photographs of were stolen in a New York Times video 1981, and found later that year by a construction worker in a dumpster outside showing Michelle Williams getting into a fast food restaurant in Brooklyn. The construction worker, John Vassos, did character for her role in not recognize the as Monroe, and only reunited them with photogra- pher Bert Stern when a friend told him about the advertised reward. Stern http://www.nytimes. com/video/magazine/ paid Vassos $5000 for the stolen photographs, which had been taken in 1962 100000001173082/ at the last photo session Monroe sat for before she died. In 2000, the whole michelle-williams-as- 2,571 photographs taken at that sitting were published, even the ones that marilyn-monroe.html. Monroe had clearly rejected by scratching crosses into the negatives (Carlson 3. For example, Lisa 2013). This rather sorry story conveys the idea of a somewhat arbitrary and Eldridge’s video https:// www.youtube.com/ fluctuating attached to the Monroe image, as well as Monroe’s lack of watch?v=RAneUTr8mog ownership of her own image. (accessed 25 March 2016), and beauty tips Undeniably, Monroe is part of our everyday culture. Her image appears articles such as this one all over all manner of artefacts, from mugs and handbags to ties and teddy in Marie Claire http:// bears, as well as appearing as fancy dress outfits, drag acts, tribute acts and www.marieclaire.com/ beauty/news/a16013/ in biopics such as My Week with Marilyn (Curtis, 2011) and The Secret Life marilyn-monroe- of Marilyn Monroe (Collyer, 2015).2 Monroe is undoubtedly a cultural icon, beauty-secrets/. inspiring numerous hair and beauty articles in magazines and ‘how to …’ make-up and hair tutorials on YouTube.3 There are innumerable Pinterest boards devoted to her, dozens of Facebook groups and pages (includ- ing ones for Marilyn Monroe’s grave and a Marilyn Monroe café), and countless Instagram accounts. This led me to set up the Twitter hashtag ‘#Marilyneveryday’, in order to highlight the frequency with which one encounters an image of Monroe in daily life. This special issue acknowl- edges the cultural ubiquity of Marilyn Monroe and assesses some of the reasons why this is still the case: why is she still so popular and why is her image so frequently used in advertising and publicity for seemingly unre- lated items? The contributors to this journal each work with Monroe in very different ways. Sarah Churchwell read 300 biographies in her research for The Many Lives of Marilyn Monroe (Granta, 2004) and so is uniquely well placed to reflect upon the obsessions and preoccupations of biographers. Cathy Lomax is an artist whose work is inspired by the make-up and fashion of female film stars and has produced a series of paintings of Monroe’s white dresses, ghoul- ishly absent from her physical body. Through her expertise on the relationship between film and fashion, Pamela Church Gibson is able to assess Monroe’s relationship to class and culture through her clothes, and to examine both her fashion impact and her legacy. The issue of how to curate the work and image of Monroe is explored in the in-depth interviews with curators from the (BFI) and the National Portrait Gallery (NPG), who offer unique insight into the operation of Monroe as a contemporary cultural attraction. My contribution to this issue is twofold. In this introductory article, I will set out the context for the ‘#Marilyneveryday’ project and the events at the BFI Marilyn Monroe Season in June 2015. At one of these events I circulated a brief questionnaire to the audience that asked three questions: 1)

123

FFC_4.2&3_Editorial_121-143.indd 123 6/6/16 11:17 AM Lucy Bolton

4. Jackie Stacey’s Why are you attending the study day? 2) Why do you think Marilyn Monroe ground-breaking work progressed the field of endures as a cultural icon? and 3) What is your interest in Marilyn Monroe star studies by actually (fan/films/fashion/academic study/other)? In the spirit of Jackie Stacey’s Star speaking to women Gazing (1993), I seek to show what people love about Monroe and the basis of about how they 4 related to her appeal – and this is not always what one might expect. Second, I had the stars, mainly through pleasure of interviewing the curators of the Monroe film season and events consumption of their at the BFI, and the curators of the Monroe exhibition at the NPG, and have image. This research revealed how women attempted to convey the conceptual and practical complexities of their tasks styled their clothes in the section called ‘Curating Marilyn Monroe’. In this introductory article, and hair like the stars, but also how they saw therefore, I will attempt to convey the magnitude of Monroe’s cultural pres- stars as transcendent ence, and to indicate some of the realms of her influence, which the rest of the beings and role models. issue will develop. For an overview of the field of star studies as a discipline, THE MONROE INDUSTRY Martin Shingler’s A Critical Guide (2012) is There are several books on the topic of the industry that is Marilyn excellent. Monroe. In Marilyn Memorabilia: Putting a Price on the Priceless Performer, Clark Kidder (described on the cover as ‘a highly sought-after appraiser of Marilyn Monroe memorabilia’) writes that ‘although Marilyn Monroe was with us for only a brief moment in time, she left such an indelible impres- sion on the world that she will be remembered for an eternity’ (2002: 5). The book demonstrates the mechanics of how this works, by cataloguing over 200 pages of memorabilia, from dolls and magazines, to records, ciga- rette cards and stamps, including a section on how to begin your on Marilyn Monroe, how to trade with other collectors and how to spot forged signatures. There is also a volume by Kidder called Marilyn Monroe: Cover to Cover (in two editions), which arranges magazine covers chrono- logically from 1946 to 1963, constituting a cavalcade of posed, enhanced and colourized images of Marilyn’s life in two dimensions. The number of books, photographic collections, reminiscences, dolls and other products is inestimable and ever increasing. There is a recent volume in the series Fan Phenomena on Marilyn Monroe (Block 2014), which examines her online presence, imitators and impressionists, and biopics, including the television series Smash (2012, 2013), about the making of a Broadway musi- cal based on Monroe’s life. There is even a memoir by Monroe’s dog, The Life and Opinions of Maf the Dog, and of His Friend Marilyn Monroe (O’Hagan 2011).

THE INSPIRATION O’Hagan’s canine memoir, and Cathy Lomax’s collection of disembodied Monroe white dresses, demonstrates how Monroe exceeds the category of ‘collectible’. It is apparent that Monroe continues to inspire creative work in all imaginable fields, high fashion such as Dries van Noten’s spring 2016 menswear collection, and street art in Penang (Figure 4). Monroe’s famous song and dance number from Gentlemen Prefer Blondes, ‘Diamonds are a Girl’s Best Friend’, was re-imagined by retro vocal harmony group The Puppini Sisters on their album Hollywood (2011), with Puppini, Kate Mullins, adopting the Monroe look. Mullins said,

The girls and I decided to pay homage to the Golden Era of Hollywood for our fourth studio album titled Hollywood. We took direct inspira- tion from iconic screen sirens and chanteuses of the age and naturally,

124

FFC_4.2&3_Editorial_121-143.indd 124 6/6/16 11:17 AM #Marilyneveryday

Marilyn took a central role. ‘Diamonds Are A Girl’s Best Friend’ was 5. In interview with the the song we felt best represented her contribution to the golden screen author, March 2016. and music scene. Marilyn seemed to effortlessly ooze glamour, class and 6. ‘Scarlett Johansson behind the scenes of endless sex appeal. She is a huge inspiration to me and to women of all “Dolce &Gabanna”, ages, eras and sub and we felt this song summed that up beau- July 2014, Marilyn tifully. And after all, what gal wouldn’t want to sing about and shoot Monroe’ https:// 5 www.youtube.com/ videos dripping in diamonds?! watch?v=3e5CbyL3yMk.

The sequence from Gentlemen Prefer Blondes was famously re-enacted by in her ‘’ video (1985), and indeed Madonna has reincarnated Marilyn in many of her promotional images across her career. Debbie Harry has been quoted many times throughout her career as saying that as a child she believed she was descended from Marilyn Monroe, and it is an association still invoked today (Leith 2014). Many contemporary starlets seem to go through a Monroe phase. Scarlett Johansson cloned Monroe on the red carpet when she was building her career and has been seen in many Dolce & Gabbana advertising campaigns looking and moving like Monroe.6 Stars such as Drew Barrymore and Lindsey Lohan have gone through their Marilyn phases, and the song Elton John penned about her tragic death, ‘’, was co-opted for the public performance of the tragic death of another blonde icon, Diana Princess of Wales, in 1997. This adoption of ‘Candle in the Wind’ demonstrates that it is not just the looks of Monroe that inspire others. It is also the apparent enigmatic qualities, the contrast between the glamorous, joyful beacon of supreme sensuality, and the reportedly tormented, lonely addict so often written about in biographies and captured in melancholy photographs. Since the publication of Monroe’s jottings, doodles, letters and notebooks, in Fragments (Monroe, Buchthal and Comment 2012), another side of her life has entered the public sphere: that of her own thoughts in her own words. These intimate jottings reveal a pensive, thoughtful and reflective writer, with a fascination for poetry and ideas about truth. The book inspired the documentary Love, Marilyn (Garbus, 2012), which is a disconcerting attempt to give Monroe’s words life by having a range of contemporary actors speak them. The film also includes clips of Monroe’s

Figure 4: Street art in Penang, January 2016. Photo: Tony Menzies.

125

FFC_4.2&3_Editorial_121-143.indd 125 6/9/16 9:10 AM Lucy Bolton

Figures 5–7: Kate Mullins recalls Monroe in the video for ‘Gentlemen Prefer Blondes’ by The Puppini Sisters.

7. Actress must have no recorded voice and some interviews. As the film progresses, it is accompanied mouth can be viewed here: https://vimeo. by an increasingly tragic and dramatic soundtrack, undercutting scenes where com/152498993. her words suggest she was happy, which gives the whole film a feeling that she lived a life of yearning and striving for something more. This creates a percep- tion of her life as a tragedy. Words from and , and the Strasbergs, seem to construct an ultimately tragic portrait of Monroe, culminating in sorrowful reminiscences about her death. Fragments inspired students on the film studies programme at Queen Mary University of London to make an essay film on the disjunction between the public persona and her personal life. Second-year film students Lara Ibrahim Mubaydeen and Luke Jamieson were struck by the mixture of elements in Monroe’s image when they made their film, Actress Must Have No Mouth (2015). Lara said, ‘She was very politically minded, and she was quite active in civil rights, so we were drawn to that side of her’. For Luke,

We were particularly interested in Marilyn because, more than any of the stars we researched, her image is the most prominent today: there isn’t one image that can properly convey who Marilyn really was, so we thought that by giving her a voice, through subtitles, then it would be possible to give a greater sense of her as a person, rather than just using images.

Lara and Luke’s film lasts for three minutes and 53 seconds, and takes inter- view footage of Monroe from the and and overlays this with subti- tles taken from the contents of Fragments.7 This technique serves to complicate the image of Monroe and also the public sentiments she is expressing, which creates an unnerving dichotomy. As Lara observes,

The things she says are quite morbid. There’s one particular place where she talks about having a dream that was like being cut open, and it was really shocking, and we thought it would be really powerful if we juxta- posed the two sides of her.

When asked what Monroe stands for to the students and their peers, Luke replies that ‘there’s a mix of a lot of different things; vulnerability mixed with sexuality, and there is an angelic quality as well’. Lara replied,

I remember the first time I saw her in Some Like it Hot she just glowed – it sounds really clichéd but you couldn’t take your eyes off her, and whenever she spoke she was mesmerizing. I was really surprised to hear that she had started her own production company. I would have

126

FFC_4.2&3_Editorial_121-143.indd 126 6/6/16 11:17 AM #Marilyneveryday

Figures 8–10: Stills from Actress Must Have No Mouth (2015).

thought that would be more common knowledge because it seems like a really big deal.

Lara and Luke were also able to relate some of the responses to their film. Lara said,

When we screened our footage to our peers who are roughly the same age, a lot of the comments were like ‘I’ve never seen anything like that before’, because some of the images we found were of her when it was very clear she didn’t want to be there. There was definitely some level of discomfort when watching them. And it was a cross-generational thing: I showed it to my grandma, who was more familiar with her, and she said similar things. The title of the film is actually from Fragments. Jacqueline Rose picks up the quote specifically in her chapter on Monroe in Women in Dark Times, and I found it really interesting, the idea that Marilyn Monroe herself didn’t really necessarily have a mouthpiece to talk about her political views.

I asked Luke what he hoped to achieve with the film:

What I wanted to achieve was not to try and convince anyone of reality, or how things really were, but that it would make people question what they see and suggest that Marilyn Monroe had more to her than both the and the vulnerable victim. Just to show her as a person and not to make her into a fantasy of what you want her to be, whether it’s fallen victim or hero.

These students are responding to the complexity of the Monroe image, which is so inflected with her personality and character. It is insightful and ­sensitive to hone in on the gap: there is the stratospheric magnitude of images of Monroe in circulation in print and online, but these fail to convey the woman that so many people want to know. As each of our contributors to this issue notes, Monroe’s films are not widely seen today, and so acting plays a smaller part in the circulation of her image than might be expected, but clearly is a major foundation to her longevity.

THE MOVIE ACTRESS Monroe appeared in over 30 films, and her devotion to improving her craft and being taken seriously as an actress is well documented. Her acting abilities

127

FFC_4.2&3_Editorial_121-143.indd 127 6/6/16 11:17 AM Lucy Bolton

were certainly appreciated at the time. In Picturegoer in 1954, Ronald Morris writes about Monroe as having found her forum in comedy:

Forget the glamour! Forget the come-hither slither! Forget that million- dollar shape! Well, try, anyway… This girl Monroe can act. And all those souls who believe that strong acting talent doesn’t come wrapped up in a package like Monroe are going to have to think again. (Morris 1954: 8, original emphasis)

Morris goes on to describe the way that in How to Marry a Millionaire and Gentlemen Prefer Blondes, Monroe doesn’t just give a performance but creates ‘a character study that grows and grows on you’ (1954: 8). This same issue reports that Twentieth Century-Fox was creating a new look for Monroe. Hollywood correspondent Donovan Pedelty cables Picturegoer magazine, saying:

Low hemlines and high necklines is the new studio policy for Monroe […] I believe Monroe is proving a considerable actress. I hear that ‘’, which she’s now making, will confirm my opinion. But because of the way her shirt and jeans cling to that figure in the ducking scene, nobody will notice the acting. (Picturegoer 1954)

This tension between Monroe’s passionate desire and commitment to becom- ing a more accomplished actress and the roles and reactions that her physi- cality provoked, is an indication of her struggles. Perhaps it also feeds into her appeal to audiences. This is the struggle of a person to be taken seriously: an aspect of her character which people can relate to and which, although not necessarily signalling vulnerability, does reveal both desire and concern in relation to her work, and the unfair treatment by the industry and culture in which she operated. Photographer wrote in Life magazine in 1952, when he had been asked to photograph her,

I found Marilyn anything but stupid, with an amazing frankness and a good sense of humour, and her company stimulating even in a spiritual way. The trait which struck me most was a general benevolence, an abso- lute absence of envy and jealousy, which in an actress was astonishing. (1952: 69)

There’s a long-standing fascination with whether or not Marilyn was a dumb blonde or whether she was responsible for her own witticisms, or ‘Monroeisms’. Such interest is revealed in an interview in 1956, by Pete Martin. Quizzing talent scout Flack Jones about whether or not Monroe came up with her own witticisms, Jones says, ‘I’m sorry to disagree with the majority […] but she makes up those cracks herself’ (Martin 1956: 108). A ghostwriter had written that the reason Monroe did not like to suntan was because it confused the colours in her wardrobe. Monroe had scratched this sentence out of the draft that had been sent to her for approval. Jones relates their exchange:

‘That’s ridiculous’, she said, ‘Having a suntan doesn’t have anything to do with my wardrobe’. I said, ‘You’ve got to say something, Marilyn.

128

FFC_4.2&3_Editorial_121-143.indd 128 6/6/16 11:17 AM #Marilyneveryday

After all, the guy’s article is pretty short as it is’. She thought for a 8. As discussed by in Fetishism minute, then wrote, ‘I do not suntan because I like to feel blonde all and Curiosity over’. I saw her write that with her own hot little pencil. (1996: 47–8) and Lucy (Martin 1956: 108) Bolton in Film and Female Consciousness (2011: 101–02). This story is so revealing, not only of the ongoing preoccupation with Marilyn’s cognitive abilities, but because the description of her ‘little pencil’ and the perception of it as being ‘hot’ both patronizingly diminishes her size and adulthood, and sexualizes her writing instrument because it is being used by her hand. This is also a conversation between two men, Pete Martin and Flack Jones, in which they discuss her ability to think wittily; this indicates clearly the layers of prurient obsession with Monroe’s mind and body that is so central to her persistence in the cultural imagination. Flack Jones refuses to be drawn on psychological speculation, saying ‘I honestly think that Marilyn’s the most complicated woman I’ve ever known. Her complexes are so complex that she has complexes about complexes’ (Martin 1956: 110). There is of course a fundamental unknowability about any star, but fans and readers seem to be content with biographies and reminiscences about other stars such as Ava Gardner or Elizabeth Taylor; with Monroe there is a persistent fascination with what she was really like. This may have some- thing to do with the level of artifice of her star persona, in terms of blonde- ness, whiteness, affected facial mannerisms, such as the quivering lips and the breathy baby voice. This could convey the idea that her image is so concen- trated on the surface that she is never seen to plumb the depths.8 Her perfor- mance as Roslyn in The Misfits (Huston, 1961), however, is evidence that the kind of psychological delving required by that part was very much within Monroe’s range of dramatic abilities, and yet this is not the image that persists most widely in culture. This does not mean, however, that it is only the beauty pin-up that people want to read about, or indeed that the pin-up is how people see Marilyn Monroe, or, as Sarah Churchwell puts it, ‘their Marilyn’. It is precisely because so many people are so attracted to Monroe that she remains a draw for crowds of gallery attendees and cultural consumers as well as moviegoers.

THE CULTURAL ATTRACTION In autumn 2012 to early 2013, the NPG in London held an exhibition called ‘Marilyn Monroe: A British Love Affair’, and the ‘Hollywood Costume’ exhi- bition was being staged at the Victoria and Albert Museum (V&A), includ- ing two of Monroe’s costumes: the nude dress from Some Like It Hot and the white halter-neck dress from The Seven Year Itch. To have such visibility in two of London’s major cultural institutions is testament to the magnitude of Monroe’s persona and her continuing capital as a cultural attraction. Co-curator of the ‘Hollywood Costume’ exhibition, Keith Lodwick, talked to me about the exhibition at the V&A, and told me about some of the prac- ticalities involved in exhibiting costumes worn by Marilyn Monroe. First, the hunt for the white halter dress worn in The Seven Year Itch took more than five years, involving a trip to meet who had the dress in her collection and a further hunt after Reynolds sold the dress for $4.6 million in 2011, which was the highest price in history for a Hollywood costume. The dress was finally secured from a buyer in Qatar; it was who intervened and enabled co-curators Deborah Nadoolman Landis and Keith

129

FFC_4.2&3_Editorial_121-143.indd 129 6/6/16 11:17 AM Lucy Bolton

Lodwick to make contact and to secure the dress for the exhibition. The ways in which a curator comes by a treasured costume might be far less intricate. Lodwick tells how the ‘Running Wild’ dress from Some Like it Hot was bought by the BFI for the Museum of the Moving Image (MOMI) in the 1980s. MOMI closed in the late 1990s and the dress had been kept in storage at the BFI, but following conversations between these two institutions over the course of Hollywood Costume, the dress was transferred to the V&A, who now have it in storage. Lodwick describes how the purpose of ‘Hollywood Costume’ was to put the costume designer at the centre stage of the creation of meaning on-screen: to show just how much character meaning is created and contained in these iconic costumes. In Lodwick’s words, ‘How they unpack a script and create a character, embodied by an actor’: but that embodiment becomes an issue when displaying the costume. How can that simple green sweater and skirt worn by as Judy in Vertigo look anything as dramatic and mean- ingful when not inhabited by Novak’s hourglass form? The problem of coming up with a mannequin that could possibly recall the shape of Monroe, let alone evoke her spirit and presence, was a huge challenge. Figures 11 and 12 indi- cate how successful the V&A textile mounting and conservation department were in the display of these costumes. The use of video footage of the actor’s moving head atop the convincingly filled-out Monroe costumes, created a dynamic display that evoked the characters of Sugar Kane Kowalczyk and ‘the girl’, recalling their mobility and vitality, and also capturing the iconic images conveyed through the combination of these dresses, the characters, the films, and the actor who played them. The dress that Monroe wore in the sequence in Some Like it Hot that spans the singing of ‘’ and the attempts to melt the frozen lips of ’s fake Shell Oil heir, is, as Lodwick describes, ‘sexy, curvaceous and transparent, making her look as if she is lit from within’; and featured the cheeky heart cut-out on the buttock, which is barely noticeable in the film itself but which is so in keeping with the character of the love-seeking chanteuse (Figure 13). The dress is designed by Orry Kelly to be inhabited by Sugar, not station- ary on a mannequin, so the challenge is to capture the idea of character and movement in order to breathe life into the display. Certainly other exhibitions of Monroe’s dresses and costumes have been more static. In June 2012, the Getty Images Gallery staged an exhibition of Monroe’s costumes, photographs and memorabilia. A selection of costumes from films including Gentlemen Prefer Blondes, Niagara and The Prince and the Showgirl, were displayed in a row alongside each other on uniform mannequins in a display cabinet. The exhibition of shoes, costumes and personal wardrobe at the Museum in Florence in 2013 was a rich and thought- ful display of video clips, costumes mounted on mannequins, and works of art that recalled the tradition of female beauty in art, of which Monroe is clearly a part. Even here though, amidst the opulence of the setting and the richness of the materials, Monroe’s complex personality was evident. The row of shoes made by Ferragamo was almost entirely uniform: one simple court, with the same heel height (4 inches), was repeated in 30 different colours. In the room where her personal wardrobe was on display, this consisted mainly of a series of black dresses of varying degrees of formality, and a few Pucci shirts. This was not the off-duty wardrobe one might expect of the most photographed star of the 1950s, and the woman perceived to be the most glamorous star of all time.

130

FFC_4.2&3_Editorial_121-143.indd 130 6/9/16 9:16 AM #Marilyneveryday

Figure 11: The dress from Some Like it Hot, designed by Orry Kelly (Victoria and Albert Museum).

131

FFC_4.2&3_Editorial_121-143.indd 131 6/9/16 9:15 AM Lucy Bolton

Figure 12: The dress from The Seven Year Itch, designed by (Victoria and Albert Museum).

132

FFC_4.2&3_Editorial_121-143.indd 132 6/9/16 9:15 AM #Marilyneveryday

Figure 13: The cheeky love heart cut-out on the rear of Orry Kelly’s iconic design (Victoria and Albert Museum).

133

FFC_4.2&3_Editorial_121-143.indd 133 6/9/16 9:15 AM Lucy Bolton

9. discusses Clare Freestone, co-curator of the NPG’s Monroe exhibition, ‘Marilyn Monroe at length in Monroe: A British Love Affair’ (2012–2013), describes Monroe in the accom- Heavenly Bodies, and is referred to in detail by panying copy as ‘an everlasting icon of the twentieth century’ (2012: 9). In Pamela Church Gibson fact, it seems that the everlasting nature of Monroe’s stardom is ensuring her in this issue. place in twenty-first-century iconicity too. In June 2015 the BFI held a Marilyn 10. The event was Monroe season, screening fifteen of her films and holding two events designed co-curated by and Jemma to probe the complexity and longevity of her star image. In ‘Curating Marilyn Desai, founder of the Monroe’, the curators and programmers of the NPG and BFI screenings and ‘I am Dora’ curatorial events share their experiences of staging these events, revealing the think- initiative, who also chaired the panel: ing that went into the selection of Monroe as a subject for the exhibition and www.iamdora.co.uk. screenings, as well as insights into the practicalities of making them happen, many of which shed new light on such matters for academic scholars. The reasons for staging a free exhibition on Marilyn Monroe, for example, may be less romantic than we might imagine, and of course none of these events would happen if they did not have commercial potential. It resonates with Richard Dyer’s pioneering work on stardom to speak about Monroe as a guar- antee against loss of investment (1979: 11), which in turn illustrates the contin- ued relevance of Dyer’s work, as well as Monroe’s star power.9 There were two events programmed as part of the BFI’s Monroe season, and both were designed by Education Curator of Public Programmes, David Edgar, with the aim of investigating deeper meanings of Monroe’s image and career. The first event was a panel discussion called ‘Who do you think you are, Marilyn Monroe?’, where I was in conversation alongside Jacqueline Rose and , considering the notion of Monroe as a feminist icon.10 Each member of the panel chose a still image and a film clip that they thought significant in this regard. I chose a photograph of Monroe and cooking in the kitchen together and Cherie’s rendition of ‘That Ol’ Black Magic’ from Bus Stop (Logan, 1956); Rose chose a photograph of Monroe standing next to a bust of Abraham Lincoln and a clip of Roslyn screaming at Gay and Guido from The Misfits (Huston, 1961); and Bonnie Greer chose a photograph of Monroe with and the clip of Miss Casswell’s big moment on the stairs from (Mankiewicz, 1950). Each of these images and scenes is an incar- nation of a different element of the Monroe spirit, and prompted a lively debate between the panellists about their meanings and implications. For example, I proposed that the Life magazine Monroe-and-Signoret photograph was an image of a domesticated Monroe, engaged in faux culinary collaboration with the wife of her lover (), and offered a vision of female solidarity and companionship that is virtually absent from Monroe’s off-screen persona. For Rose, however, the Monroe in this image appears nervous, overdressed and childlike and fully outgunned by a powerfully androgynous Signoret, who is ­assertively in charge of the cooking and the conversation. This differ- ence no doubt reflects the differing academic backgrounds of Rose and myself, feminism and and feminist film studies, respectively, but also demonstrates the possibilities any one image of Monroe offers. Greer’s perspective was more personal, having studied at the herself, as Monroe had done in the 1950s: she had also written the play Marilyn and Ella Backstage at the about the friendship between Monroe and Fitzgerald, particularly Monroe’s role in ensuring that Fitzgerald was invited to sing at the Mocambo club despite the colour bar. The play was first broadcast on BBC Radio 4 in 2005 and subsequently adapted for the stage. Rose’s work on the social burden that Monroe was expected to carry (Women in Dark Times, 2014), and my own on the essentializing of Monroe as ‘the girl’ in The Seven Year Itch

134

FFC_4.2&3_Editorial_121-143.indd 134 6/6/16 11:17 AM #Marilyneveryday

Figure 14: Signoret and Monroe tackle meal preparation together for the cameras. Bruce Davidson, ‘Kitchen’, featuring Marilyn Monroe and Simone Signoret, 1960, Millers and Montands portfolio, , CA, https://flic.kr/p/4dvMeU. Image licensed to Rebeca Avila Contacto by Rebeca Avila © Bruce Davidson / Magnum Photos.

(Film and Female Consciousness, 2011), ensured that three very different critical perspectives were brought to bear on the question of what Monroe stands for, ranging from isolated victim, to political activist, to idealization of femininity: and it emerged clearly that Monroe encapsulates all of these and far more. The second event accompanying the BFI season was a study day, which I co-curated with David Edgar, called ‘Marilyn Monroe Study Day: Understanding a Cultural Phenomenon’. I chaired the day, and spoke about the impetus for #Marilyneveryday, the purpose of the event being to consider the prevalence and popularity of Marilyn Monroe in and to try to work out why she is everywhere, every day. The speakers were Sarah Churchwell, author of The Many Lives of Marilyn Monroe (2000) and contribu- tor to this issue, Pamela Church Gibson, also contributing, and Laura Adams, Events Programmer at BFI Southbank and co-curator of the Monroe season (alongside Helen de Witt). All these speakers are exceptionally well placed to speak about different aspects of Monroe’s life, work and legacy, includ- ing her film performances, relationship to fashion, and her inspiring of over 300 biographies. Churchwell is in the undoubtedly unique position of having read all of these biographies, as she describes in her article ‘Trashing Marilyn: Reflections of a meta-biographer’, and so is uniquely able to tease out recur- rent themes, claims and obsessions across this remarkable body of work. Most notably, in her talk at the study day, she identified the urge to tell ‘the truth’ about Monroe, especially about the circumstances and cause of her death. Churchwell explains in her article the path that she decided to navigate, but at the study day she was able to testify to just how many competing claims to ‘truth’ there are, to suggest why this is the case, and also to reveal the surprisingly high stakes involved in immersing oneself in the field of Monroe biography.

135

FFC_4.2&3_Editorial_121-143.indd 135 6/9/16 9:17 AM Lucy Bolton

Laura Adams spoke about Monroe ‘shining on the screen’ in her film performances and analysed in close detail the facial expressions and bodily movements that Monroe created in different genres of performance: comedy in the scene where Lorelei describes Piggy squeezing the goat in Gentlemen Prefer Blondes, song and dance in the provocative ‘We’re Having a Heatwave’ number in There’s No Business Like Showbusiness (Lang, 1954), and serious drama in the tender scene where Roslyn meets Guido and Gay in The Misfits. Adams pointed out the mannerisms and gestures that created the emotional and physi- cal elements of these performances, thereby indicating the detail and breadth of Monroe’s acting ability. Adams’ shifted from Monroe’s nose scrunch and pouting mouth as Lorelei, to her swaying pelvis and midriff as Vicky, and her low key pace and dejected tone as Roslyn. Highlighting one particular shot from the scene in the diner, Adams described Monroe’s reaction to Gay’s description of ‘how you just live’ as ‘a unique instance of Marilyn smiling for herself’. This is a provocative and insightful observation that adds to the poignancy of this scene and this film, suggesting that Roslyn is a latter-day Monroe incar- nation, who has achieved a measure of resignation and yet can still be pleas- antly surprised. Adams observed that Monroe on-screen is ‘never in repose, always keeping some aspect of her expression in motion’, and discussed the role of Monroe’s various acting and performance coach: Natasha Lytess, her first highly influential acting coach; Jack Cole, jazz dance choreographer; Hal Schaefer, voice coach; Milton Greene, collaborator in the realms of produc- tion and photography; and , at the Actors Studio in New York. This insight into the commitment and work that Monroe put into honing her craft and striving to improve as an actor, is an aspect that is lost in the concen- tration on the surface, the pin up, the icon. Adams also pointed out that Monroe forged touching relationships on-screen with animals and children,­ such as Gay’s dog in The Misfits, and Mark Calder in The River of No Return (Preminger, 1954). These aspects of Monroe, her serious professionalism, and her delicate sensitivity, are further evidence of the complexity of her image, just as tales of her legendary lateness, and inability to remember her lines, supplement this concoction of characteristics even further.

Figure 15: Roslyn smiles for herself in The Misfits (1961).

136

FFC_4.2&3_Editorial_121-143.indd 136 6/6/16 11:17 AM #Marilyneveryday

Pamela Church Gibson spoke about the fashion context in which Monroe emerged, and how her ‘look’ in terms of clothes, hair and make-up broke the mould of the 1950s. Analysing Monroe’s component parts, it became clear that Monroe was not about structured ‘fashion’ at all, but rather that she projected a relaxed individuality, about loose hair, glamorous make- up, and clothes that either hugged her body or suggested nudity. These are elements developed in Church Gibson’s article, ‘Marilyn and her female audi- ences: Consumption, transgression, emulation’, along with Monroe’s complex relationship to consumer fashion. Many people are able to try and dress like Monroe, and always have done, which tends to keep her clothes firmly on the High Street, rather than emulated in haute couture.

QUESTIONNAIRES This brief consideration of some of the areas of cultural life where Monroe’s impact is heavily evident, and the complexity of that impact, goes some way to suggest how multifaceted Monroe’s image remains. No wonder, then, that the reasons people have for being interested in Monroe are myriad, as is evidenced by the questionnaires filled in by participants in the BFI Study Day. This audience did contain some academics, but was mainly composed of non- academics who have affection and respect for Monroe in all sorts of capacities. We collected 38 completed questionnaires and people had written all over the pages, turned them over to write on the reverse, and conveyed really personal experiences and thoughtful arguments. I will set out some of the phrases and opinions below, but in summary the words that stand out again and again are ‘unique’, ‘underrated’, ‘beauty’ and ‘complexity’: and within that complexity the ideas of sexuality and vulnerability, but also intelligence and kindness. The word ‘charisma’ is repeated several times, as is ‘enigma’, and yet, there is also a powerful sense of affection for and closeness to the star. Someone observed that she is ‘loved by men and women equally’, another that ‘many people can find something relatable in their Marilyn, and possibly for some she is a source of strength and inspiration’. Responses to the question, ‘Why are you attending this study day?’, indi- cated the range of participants and their different reasons for interest:

‘To hear other people discuss her seriously, to learn more’ ‘A gift from myself for my birthday – to enjoy thinking about and being immersed in Marilyn’ ‘I still go Wow! Every time I see her. I think I secretly want to feel close to her’ ‘I’m writing a novel about ’ ‘I have a lifelong love of Marilyn’ Someone who has ‘liked her for over eighteen years’ and someone who has ‘loved her for over 60 years’ Someone writing their school dissertation Someone who related because of depression and another because she also had endometrioses ‘I’m a mother of a young actress’

137

FFC_4.2&3_Editorial_121-143.indd 137 6/6/16 11:17 AM Lucy Bolton

‘She’s by far my favourite Hollywood star’ ‘Her “story” applied to my angst-ridden adolescent self!’ ‘Because anything to do with Marilyn is always fascinating and her beauty and many talents have never ceased to give me great pleasure [over 60 years]. A study day is a unique opportunity to share the love of Marilyn with other like-minded people’

The range of interests in Monroe was both professional and personal: ‘I’m interested in her as a feminist icon. She broke the mould. I always get very defensive when people portray Marilyn as a victim. To me, she was a powerful, successful woman who made decisions, which were HER decisions. I admire her for all she achieved. I’ve also admired her as someone confident in her own physicality and sexual charisma. She seems comfortable as a woman for herself. I think this comes over in her films’ ‘I’m a television writer. All my protagonists are women. I’m always looking to create iconic characters who are strong, flawed, layered, and real: like Marilyn’ ‘I’ve been a Marilyn fan since my teens and saw as many films as I could on VHS. I’m now an art historian with interests in both film and fashion. She remains a personal style inspiration for me; I’ve read numerous biographies and books about her and am enjoying rewatch- ing her films’ ‘I’m a director and a film-maker and I think she was very underrated as an actress […] she was highly unique, full of contradictions and difficult to understand’ ‘Her performances; the ultimate purveyor of female “drag” in its highest form, […] and yet it wasn’t who she really was or really wanted to be – much was projected onto her’ ‘It’s her talent that I’m a fan of’ ‘I believe Marilyn deserves to be re-evaluated. She should be given credit for her prodigious talent. I am so happy that she is being discussed with respect and admiration. This is why I am here. It has been a revelation’. ‘Her relationship to feminism – can I be a feminist and a fan of Marilyn Monroe? How does she fit into that discourse?’ ‘I based my last fashion collection on MM. I fell in love and used her as a muse’

When asked why the stardom of Marilyn Monroe endures, the insights people offered were moving, thoughtful and to the point: ‘Her image has been fetishized and captured by famous artists, and the conspiracy surrounding death’ ‘She is everywhere as people profit from her image. People want what she had (charisma, glamour), but also through the sheer force of who she is – namely her talent’

138

FFC_4.2&3_Editorial_121-143.indd 138 6/6/16 11:17 AM #Marilyneveryday

‘Mystery surrounding her death. Relatable personality, e.g. depression, loneliness, alcohol, men seeing her as a sex object when all she wanted was love; her beauty, coming from under privileged beginnings and working hard to become something (a phoenix rising from the ashes), her many men, myths surrounding her, her curvaceous body in a land of size zero’ ‘Her relatability – how she dealt with her depression and yet still managed to be so successful. Her beauty – how she made herself up (with make-up and clothes) to look the way she did’ ‘Appears accessible and knowable’ ‘I feel as if I know her, which of course I don’t’ ‘So much mythology about her, particularly regarding her behaviour on set, her reliance on the Strasbergs, her constant lateness and absence’ A future film Ph.D. student writes, ‘she transcends her primary medium of film. In fact, I’m sure a lot of people haven’t seen many of her films. Instead she stands for many things for different people: excessive glamour, sex appeal, her body. As an image of femininity, this endures’ ‘Stunning without being cocky, and she is not your perfect model: her figure is natural and gives people hope […] she is extremely empower- ing and everybody in her presence seems ordinary compared to her’

‘Because of her remarkable star quality and charisma; she leaps off the screen and out of the photograph’ ‘Her image is so beautiful; I think her photographs speak a thousand words and people are drawn to her’ ‘She was talented, beautiful, and was in some great movies. She worked hard to be famous and to be taken seriously, so her longevity shows how that pays off’ ‘Her acting and her talent was never recognised’

One person was very succinct:

‘Many reasons. 1. Her beauty and gifts as an actress 2. The tragic circumstances of her premature death 3. Her struggles to lead an active life as an actress in the face of paparazzi and newshounds’ Another also provided a list of the following four: ‘1. She created an image of personal beauty to which women still aspire; 2. She’s been an inspiration for many other artists, e.g. Madonna 3. The similarity of her early roles – she is still identified with the Lorelei persona 4. Her tragic early death – if you compare to Brigitte Bardot, we see her in the context of her later life’

139

FFC_4.2&3_Editorial_121-143.indd 139 6/6/16 11:17 AM Lucy Bolton

What comes through most strongly is the multiple facets of Monroe’s stardom: ‘She was everything at once: playful and deep, sexy and political, savvy and compassionate. A star and an underdog. Beautifully glamorous and human. An enigma never goes out of fashion’ ‘Intelligent, great quotes, amazing style, real faults and difficulties’ ‘She was very beautiful, underrated as an actor, and had a tortured private life’ ‘She is incredibly charismatic, has a lot of presence, there is a sensitivity and strength in how she comes across. There is a knowing innocence in her films that is funny and endearing’ ‘I love her films, they always put me in a good mood when I watch them. She is very charismatic, beautiful, and there is a vulnerability about her (although also a strength), but not in a weak way; it’s a vulnerability full of empathy and awareness. When I found out she had spoken out on behalf of gay rights and civil rights it didn’t surprise me, because of that empathy and awareness she embodied’ ‘She is adaptable, people choose what they want her to be. She is elevated beyond relatable so we create what we want her to be’ ‘Despite all or any books or articles to the contrary, I think Marilyn was not only a fine actress and personality but also a very nice person – this endures and shines through’ ‘The different facets of MM can fill different gaps in what we need – she is an icon we need’

‘AN ICON WE NEED’ This quote seems to encapsulate many of the aspects that contribute to Monroe’s longevity. There is undeniably the status of the icon about many of her images, most notably the artwork; the white halter-neck dress billowing up around her waist; the image of her from behind in the nude sparkly dress as she sang ‘Happy Birthday Mr President’ to JFK, and the young nude stretched out on red fabric in the ‘Golden Dreams’ calendar. The idea of us needing her is an inversion of the neediness so often attrib- uted to her persona, and suggests that perhaps there are so many aspects to her image that she embodies something for many people, whether it is her performance, her health, or her struggle to be taken seriously, and those elements are not all reliably stable. As one participant wrote, ‘there is so much to relate to: sometimes vulnerable, sometimes in charge’. One questionnaire raised the issue of how social media contributes to the understanding we have of Monroe. Referring in particular to the Monroe quotes on social media platforms such as Pinterest and Instagram, this respondent observed:

‘Are they reconfirming the popular stereotype? I think the quotes are interesting because they’ve moved the story on from her image to “what she said” (if indeed she did “say” it) […] You don’t need to read a bio to know ‘her’ beyond the image’

This proliferation of a personality called Marilyn Monroe, full of witticisms, quotes and sayings, is an aspect of her image that has certainly developed

140

FFC_4.2&3_Editorial_121-143.indd 140 6/6/16 11:17 AM #Marilyneveryday

in the light of fan sites, blogs and accounts with hundreds of thousands of followers. Most of this is founded on appreciation and affection. There is another angle to this adaptability and manipulation of images, however. In her consideration of Hollywood female stars, Karen Hollinger writes in rela- tion to Marilyn Monroe and that their lives

have been the subject of numerous star biographies, but serious scholarly analysis has yet to investigate fully the effects of commercial exploitation on female stars. This exploitation is exacerbated by the fact that contem- porary stars now suffer from a new form of commercial commodification not found in the studio era: exploitation by the Internet porn industry. (Hollinger 2006: 58)

This article, and indeed this special issue, perhaps skirts around the question of exploitation and rather looks at the conceptual reasons why such continued use of the Monroe image for cultural consumption might occur and some of the ways in which it does. My aim has been to demonstrate the extent of the popularity of Marilyn Monroe today, and to offer some suggestions – by fans, curators, academics and artists – as to why her persona remains so relevant. There are, of course, many further avenues to pursue, and this issue prob- ably raises more questions than it answers, but perhaps that is an appropriate place for scholarship on Marilyn Monroe to be.

REFERENCES Block, M. (ed.) (2014), Fan Phenomena: Marilyn Monroe, Bristol: Intellect. Bolton, L. (2011), Film and Female Consciousness: Irigaray, Cinema and Thinking Women, London: Palgrave Macmillan. Carlson, B. (2013), ‘Obituary, Bert Stern: Photographer who became best known for “Last Sitting” of Marilyn Monroe’, The Independent, http:// www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/bert-stern-photographer-who- became-best-known-for-the-last-sitting-of-marilyn-monroe-8682291. html. Accessed 24 April 2016. Clark, C. (2007), Indulge: 100 Perfect Desserts, Bath: Absolute Press. Collyer, L. (2015), The Secret Life of Marilyn Monroe, 2 episodes, USA: Asylum Entertainment, Don Carmody Television. Curtis, S. (2011), My Week with Marilyn, UK and USA: The Weinstein Company, BBC Films. Dyer, R. (1979), Stars, London: BFI Publishing. —— (1987), Bodies: Film Stars and Society, Basingstoke: Macmillan Education. Eldridge, L. (2012), ‘Marilyn Monroe iconic makeup look’, https://www. youtube.com/watch?v=RAneUTr8mog. Accessed 24 April 2016. Fisher, L. A. (2015), ‘10 Actresses who portrayed Marilyn Monroe in film’, Harpers Bazaar, http://www.harpersbazaar.com/culture/film-tv/g5775/ actresses-who-played-marilyn-monroe/? Accessed 24 April 2016. Freestone, C. (2012), Marilyn Monroe: A British Love Affair, National Portrait Gallery Guide, Autumn/Winter, London: National Portrait Gallery, pp. 8–9. Garbus, Liz (2012), Love, Marilyn, USA and France: Diamond Girl Productions and Studio Canal. Greer, B. (2005), Marilyn and Ella, BBC Radio 4, 16 December. Halsman, P. (1952), ‘Shooting Marilyn’, Life, 7 April, pp. 66–70, 84. Hollinger, K. (2006), The Actress: Hollywood Acting and the Female Star, New York and London: Routledge.

141

FFC_4.2&3_Editorial_121-143.indd 141 6/6/16 11:17 AM Lucy Bolton

Ibrahim Mubaydeen, L. and Jamieson, L. (2015), Actress Must Have No Mouth, London: Queen Mary University of London. John, E. and Taupin, B. (1974), ‘Candle in the Wind’, Goodbye Yellow Brick Road, London: Trident Studios. —— (1997), ‘Candle in the Wind’, CD Single, UK and US: Rocket. Kidder, C. (2002), Marilyn Memorabilia: Putting a Price on the Priceless Performer, Iola, WI: Krause Publications. —— (2003), Marilyn Monroe: Cover to Cover, 2nd ed., Iola, WI: Krause Publications. Lacombe, B. (2011), ‘Michelle Williams/Marilyn Monroe’, New York Times, 21 November, http://www.nytimes.com/video/magazine/100000001173082/ michelle-williams-as-marilyn-monroe.html. Accessed 24 April 2016. Leith, W. (2014), ‘Blonde beauty: Debbie Harry talks looks, music, and lacking that maternal instinct ahead of the picnic tonight’, Irish Independent, 29 August, http://www.independent.ie/entertainment/music/blonde-beauty- debbie-harry-talks-looks-music-and-lacking-that-maternal-instinct-ahead- of-the-picnic-tonight-30538928.html. Accessed 24 April 2016. Martin, P. (1956), ‘The new Marilyn Monroe, here she talks about herself’, The Saturday Evening Post, 12 May, pp. 28–29, 108–13. Monroe, M., Stanley, B. and Comment, B. (eds) (2010), Marilyn Monroe: Fragments, London: HarperCollins. Morris, R. (1954), ‘They’re making an actress of Monroe’, Picturegoer, 16 January, p. 8. Mulvey, L. (1996), Fetishism and Curiosity, London: British Film Institute. O’Hagan, A. (2011), The Life and Opinions of Maf the Dog, and of His Friend Marilyn Monroe, London: Faber. The Puppini Sisters (2011), Hollywood, France: Decca. Rose, J. (2014), Women in Dark Times, London: Bloomsbury. Shingler, M. (2012), Star Studies: A Critical Guide, London: Palgrave Macmillan. Smash (2012, 2013, USA: National Broadcasting Company). Stacey, J. (1993), Star Gazing: Hollywood Cinema and Female Spectatorship, London and New York: Routledge. Valenti, L. (2015), ‘8 Beauty secrets from Marilyn Monroe’s makeup artist’, Marie Claire, 21 September, http://www.marieclaire.com/beauty/news/ a16013/marilyn-monroe-beauty-secrets/. Accessed 24 April 2016. Wilder, B. (1955), The Seven Year Itch, USA: Twentieth Century Fox. —— (1959), Some Like it Hot, USA: Ashton Productions, The Mirisch Corporation.

CONTRIBUTOR DETAILS Lucy Bolton is Senior Lecturer in Film Studies at Queen Mary University of London and guest editor of this special issue of Film, Fashion & Consumption. Her research focuses on film and philosophy, with particular interest in femi- nist philosophy and phenomenology. She is the author of Film and Female Consciousness: Irigaray, Cinema and Thinking Women (Palgrave 2011, paper- back 2015). She has published widely on the relationship between the work of Luce Irigaray and cinema, and is also interested in the work of Virginia Woolf and Iris Murdoch. She is currently writing a monograph on Iris Murdoch’s philosophy and contemporary cinema (Edinburgh University Press, 2018). Lucy also researches, teaches and publishes on stardom and celebrity, and is currently writing about the stardom of Grace Kelly and Ava Gardner in the film Mogambo (John Ford, 1953). She has recently co-edited, with Julie

142

FFC_4.2&3_Editorial_121-143.indd 142 6/6/16 11:17 AM #Marilyneveryday

Lobalzo-Wright, a collection entitled Lasting Stars: Images that Fade and Personas that Endure (Palgrave Macmillan, 2016) and has written about the film performances of for Vivien Leigh: Actress, Star, Icon (Manchester University Press, 2016), and also women in Clint Eastwood’s films for Tough Ain’t Enough: The Film Career of Clint Eastwood (Rutgers University Press, 2017). Lucy is co-founder of the Living British Cinema forum based at QMUL. She is on the editorial board of the journal Film-Philosophy, and is co-editor, with Richard Rushton, of the new book series Visionaries: Thinking through Female Filmmakers (Edinburgh University Press). Contact: School of Languages, Linguistics and Film, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected]

Lucy Bolton has asserted her right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as the author of this work in the format that was submitted to Intellect Ltd.

143

FFC_4.2&3_Editorial_121-143.indd 143 6/6/16 11:17 AM intellect books & journals Performing Arts Visual Arts Film Studies Cultural & Media Studies

Intellect books

publishers of original thinking | www.intellectbooks.com

Fashion as Masquerade We are here to support your ideas and get them published. Critical Studies in Fashion & Beauty: To send us your new book or Volume III journal proposal, please down- load a questionnaire from Edited by Efrat Tseëlon, Laini Burton, and www.intellectbooks.com. Diana Crane ISBN 978-1-78320 -367-3 60 halftones 230 pp | £47.50, $68 Paperback | Autumn 2014 220 x 220mm

Fashion as Masquerade focuses on issues of power, social positioning, ideologies, and practices within the web of relationships between creators, producers, practitioners, and end-users of fashion.

Masking has a rich history but it is also a metaphor for fashion itself. Fashion is a mask that constructs or subverts meanings. Exploring the contemporary meanings of masks, masking, and masquerade, essays here consider masking in its various forms as a conscious or unconscious form of behaviour. Masking is revealed as a strategy for reclaiming control over the construction of meanings, and creating a space for resistance that is independent of either social prescriptions or the controlling gaze. To view our catalogue or order Fashion as Masquerade showcases the articles from the our books and journals visit third volume of Intellect’s journal Critical Studies in Fashion www.intellectbooks.com & Beauty.

Intellect, The Mill, Parnall Road, Efrat Tseëlon is editor-in-chief of the journal Critical Studies in Fashion Fishponds, Bristol, BS16 3JG. & Beauty (Intellect). Laini Burton is a lecturer at the Queensland College of Art, Griffith University, Australia. Diana Crane is the author of several books, including Fashion and Its Social Agendas (University of Chicago Tel: +44 (0) 117 9589910 Press, 2001). Fax: +44 (0) 117 9589911

FFC_4.2&3_Editorial_121-143.indd 144 6/6/16 11:17 AM