DOCSLIB.ORG

Paying for Water: Water Pricing and Equity in England and Wales Author(S): Karen J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Paying for Water: Water Pricing and Equity in England and Wales Author(S): Karen J Paying for Water: Water Pricing and Equity in England and Wales Author(s): Karen J. Bakker Source: Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, Vol. 26, No. 2 (2001), pp. 143-164 Published by: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers) Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3650665 . Accessed: 17/08/2011 17:04 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Blackwell Publishing and The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers) are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. http://www.jstor.org Paying for water: water pricing and equity in England and Wales Karen J Bakker Over the past three decades, the business of water supply in England and Wales has been gradually transforming from the supply of a service to citizens, to the sale of a commodity to customers. The paper provides a genealogy of concepts of efficiency and equity in water regulation over the past thirty years, prior to evaluating the implications for water consumers of one aspect of this process - the shift away from policies prioritizing inter- and intra-regional equalization (implying a principle of social equity) towards policies prioritizing economic efficiency (implying a principle of economic equity) in water charging. In closing, alternatives to the current arrangements for domestic consumers are proposed. key words regulation water pricing distributive justice privatization utility regulation England and Wales Jesus College, Oxford OX1 3DW and Environmental Change Institute, School of Geography, University of Oxford email: [email protected] revised manuscript received November 2000 Introduction the water industry, and traces the evolution of policy and regulatory priorities in water charges to Over the past three decades, a change in the domestic consumers over the same time period. dominant discourse of national economic develop- Two specific developments are considered: the ment and of the role of the state in redistribution shift from policies promoting geographical equaliz- has transformed consumers' entitlements to utility ation to those resulting in differentiation of water services in England and Wales. The business of rates; and the trend away from rateable values domestic water supply, like other utilities, has been (intended as a proxy, however poor, for wealth) gradually evolving from the supply of a service to and towards metering (i.e. charges related to con- citizens at subsidized rates, towards the sale of a sumption). The analysis does not measure relative commodity to consumers on a full cost-recovery efficiency, but rather focuses on the implications for basis. This paper analyses the implications of this consumers of the substitution of the yardstick of ongoing process for domestic water users. economic efficiency for the goal of equalization.1 The first section of the paper details a genealogy The political implications of the associated dis- of concepts of efficiency in legislation and as placement of a principle of social equity by a applied in water regulation, from the nationaliz- principle of economic equity in water charging are ation of the water industry in 1974 to the present. considered in the third section. In the fourth sec- The second section of the paper contrasts concepts tion, the concepts of justice implicit in the recent of economic and social equity, details the inter- and re-regulation of the water industry are analysed, intra-regional equalization that was characteristic and alternatives to the current arrangements for of the early phase of nationalized management of domestic consumers proposed. TransInst Br Geogr NS 26 143-164 2001 ISSN 0020-2754 ? Royal Geographical Society (with The Institute of British Geographers) 2001 144 KarenJ Bakker A genealogy of efficiency monetarist constraints, the Government was left with two options: either devolve the costs of water National ownership (1974-89) quality improvement onto consumers through Neither technical nor economic efficiency were large increases in water bills; or continue to allow paramount performance criteria for the water water quality to deteriorate. The Government held industry before its nationalization in 1974.2 Rather, to its decision to prioritize the PSBR over water the security of water supply systems and public quality improvements. Whilst allowing increases health were prioritized. The principle that public in water bills - sometimes higher than the inflation ownership of and subsidies to the water supply indicator Retail Price Index (RPI) but often lower system were necessary-because of the multiple than required to meet investment requirements - it market failures to which water supply is subject encouraged greater efficiency in the water sector as (most importantly, monopoly and both negative a means of offsetting capital shortfalls (Simon and positive externalities associated with water 1986). and sanitation services) - had been widely adopted Subsequent legislation initiated and formalized at the turn of the century (Hassan 1998). Charges the transformation of the water industry in Britain for water were not determined by the necessity of 'from a public service to a business organization' cost-recovery, but set in light of the goals of uni- (Penning-Rowsell and Parker 1983,170). The Water versal provision and equitable access (Sleeman Act of 1983, for example, was predicated on the 1953), implying a concept of social equity accord- assumption that consumers were best served 'by ing to which consumers paid relative to their an efficiently run operation, providing the requisite means rather than relative to the costs they service at least cost' (MMC 1981, 264). Cost-benefit imposed on the system. analysis was introduced to the industry, and During this period, the water industry was attempts were made to introduce long run mar- regulated in a manner broadly consistent with the ginal cost pricing (Synnott 1985, 70). Efficiency aims of other nationalized industries. Water was measures were introduced; for example, job shed- regarded as a strategic resource, and water- ding in the industry dates from the early 1980s charging policy was administered in light of with employment levels peaking in the early 1980s Keynesian regional policies aimed at supporting and reducing substantially before privatization in full productive employment of spare regional 1989 (Figure 1) (O'Connell-Davidson 1993). By capacity (Swyngedouw 1989; Graham and Marvin the late 1980s, the nationalized industries were 1995). In common with practice in other utilities, best characterized as 'publicly regulated private water pricing policy was based on price discrimi- monopolies operating on modified market prin- nation and promotion of sales in markets where ciples' (Hay 1996, 53). Privatization consolidated demand was elastic, in order to spread fixed costs this transformation, and effected the important over output. The goal was to promote the fullest step of opening up avenues for the water utilities use of existing capacity, whilst attempting to avoid to access private capital markets. incurring the additional costs imposed by capacity During the nationalized era, water became constructed for peak load, particularly difficult in a highly networked, industrial product; with the water sector where a large proportion of capital privatization, its provision to consumers became expenditure goes to meet peak load capacity. a capital-intensive, and also highly profitable Technical efficiency - efficiency in water prod- business. This high profitability was not always uction-received greater emphasis in the period characteristic of the water industry. In the 1970s, following the creation of the Regional Water 'profits' were never mentioned in reference to Authorities in 1974, reflecting then-dominant water production; the term 'surplus', where one trends in administrative reform, and growing con- existed, was considered more appropriate for an cern over water quality rather than the previous industry supplying such a basic resource (Curwen focus on quantity (Hassan 1998; Jordan et al 1977; 1994). Water was considered to be a service, sup- Penning-Rowsell and Parker 1983). After 1974, plied at subsidized rates to citizens. It was also a the rate support grant, through which water bills strategic resource, and as with other such resources were subsidized by the state, was removed. Faced (e.g. coal), security of supply and planning for with the costs of renewing deteriorating Victorian- growth were the primary goals of managers. Water era infrastructure, but operating under strict managers enjoyed the 'quiet life' of the monopolist Paying for Water 145 80000 D WoCs 70000 *WSCS 50000 000 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Note: Data for WoCs unavailable before 1979 Data Source: WSA (various years) Figure 1 Employment levels, English and Welsh water industry (1977-99)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dwr Cymru Cyfyngedig: Not-For-Profit Structure Supports Positive Outlook
    INFRASTRUCTURE AND PROJECT FINANCE ISSUER IN-DEPTH UK Water Sector: Credit Implications of 2014 Price Review 5 JUNE 2015 Dwr Cymru Cyfyngedig: Not-for-profit structure supports positive outlook On 27 February 2015, Moody’s affirmed Dwr Cymru Cyfyngedig's (Welsh Water’s) A3 RATINGS ratings and changed the outlook to positive from stable. The positive outlook reflects Dwr Cymru Cyfyngedig our expectation that unless it materially increases the spend on customer rebates and Corporate Family Rating A3 discretionary investment, the company's gearing will trend below its new target level of 60% Outlook Positive net debt to regulatory capital value (RCV). Dwr Cymru (Financing) Limited » Gearing will fall unless spending of equity returns increases materially: Welsh Senior Secured A3 Water's ownership by Glas Cymru Cyfyngedig, a not-for-profit company limited by Backed Senior Secured A3 guarantee means that the “equity” component of the allowed return set by Ofwat, Outlook Positive KEY METRICS: the regulator for the sector in England and Wales, has historically been shared with Dwr Cymru Cyfyngedig customers via discounts on bills (the “customer dividend”) and/or discretionary March March March investments to improve service quality, rather than being paid to shareholders. In 2014 2013 2012 February 2015, Welsh Water reduced its target level of gearing to 60%, a level consistent Adjusted 1.8x 1.7x 1.6x Interest with a strongly positioned A3 rating. While the company plans to spend more of its Coverage equity return, absent a significant increase, gearing will trend below 60%, potentially Net Debt/RCV 61.9% 61.7% 63.0% creating upward rating pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Strategy for Wales
    Water Strategy for Wales Supporting the sustainable management of our natural resources Ministerial Foreword Water is one of our greatest natural assets and an integral part of Wales’ culture, heritage and national identity. It shapes our natural environment and landscapes, providing us with a sense of place in mountains, valleys and coastline and supporting Wales’ diverse wildlife. It provides a basis for economic development, including energy supply and tourism. Access to clean, safe, and resilient water supplies also plays a vital part in supporting the health and well-being of everyone who lives, works and visits here. I want to ensure that Wales has a thriving water environment which is sustainably managed to support healthy communities, flourishing businesses and biodiversity. I want people to receive first class, value for money water services with water used efficiently, safely and respectfully by all. This Strategy sets out how we believe our water resources should be managed to support our communities, nature and business. We are committed to a more integrated approach to the management of water in line with our Natural Resources Management policy and proposals in the Environment (Wales) Bill. This will ensure we have the right approach in place to sustainably manage our natural resources in a more proactive and joined up way. It will also drive green growth, ensure resource efficiency, enhance the resilience and diversity of our environment and help us to tackle poverty. We must ensure that decisions we take now will have a lasting public benefit for all of Wales. Our investment and effort must be focussed on achieving multiple outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C. List of Consultees
    Appendix C. List of Consultees C.1. Introduction C.1.1 This appendix provides a list of the organisations consulted under section 42, section 47 and section 48 of the Planning Act 2008 . C.2. Section 42(1)(a) Prescribed Consultees C.2.1 Prescribed consultees are set out under Schedule 1 of the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 ; these are outlined in Appendix Table A below. Any variation from the list of organisations set out in Schedule 1 is clarified within column 3 of the table. C.2.2 The Planning Inspectorate provided a list of prescribed consultation bodies in accordance with Regulation 9(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations and Advice Note three 1 (see Appendix A ), referred to as the “Regulation 9 list”. Those consultees included in the Reg 9 list are included in Table A, B and C. Those consultees that were not previously identified as a prescribed consultee as per Schedule 1 are identified with asterisk (*), and were consulted in the same way as the Schedule 1 consultees. C.2.3 The list of parish councils consulted under section 42 (1) (a) is outlined separately in Appendix Table C. The list of statutory undertakers consulted under Section 42 (1) (a) is outlined separately in Appendix Table B . C.2.4 Organisations noted in Appendix Tables A, B and C were issued with a copy of the Section 48 notice, notifying them of the proposed application and with consultation information, including the consultation brochure and details of how to respond. Appendix Table A: Prescribed Consultees Variation from the schedule where Consultee Organisation applicable The proposed application is not likely The Welsh Ministers N/A to affect land in Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Water and Waste Water Resilience Report 2019-20
    WelcomeWater, water to everywhere? the Water & Wastewater ConsumerResilience ReportCouncil 2019/20 for Water ccwater.org.uk ccwater.org.uk Water & Wastewater Resilience Report 2019/20 ccwater.org.uk • The amount of water lost through leakage on Overview ..................................................................................................................................3 a per property, per day basis, reduced last year Overview by 8%; this was a 7% reduction to the overall Introduction ........................................................................................................................4-5 lekage level. While it’s disappointing to see the same companies as last year among the Water Usage ........................................................................................................................6-8 worst performers, it’s encouraging to see that Within this report, we consider improvements have been made overall, with Metering ...................................................................................................................................9 the resilience of both the only one company missing their target. We know that customers feel strongly about a Leakage .............................................................................................................................10-11 water service and sewerage lack of action on leakage, so we hope to see service, by looking at the innovative approaches to ensure companies Supply Interruptions ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Works: the Regional Economic Impact of Dŵr Cymru Welsh Water
    Water Works Welsh Economy The Regional Economic Impact of DCWW Research Unit Water Works: The Regional Economic Impact of Dŵr Cymru Welsh Water 1 Water Works Welsh Economy The Regional Economic Impact of DCWW Research Unit Water Works The Regional Economic Impact of Dŵr Cymru Welsh Water Report by: Jane Bryan, Calvin Jones, Max Munday, Annette Roberts and Neil Roche Welsh Economy Research Unit Cardiff Business School For: DCWW Contact: 02920 875089 [email protected] Cardiff Business School Colum Drive Cardiff CF10 3EU, UK www.weru.org.uk 10th June 2013 2 Water Works Welsh Economy The Regional Economic Impact of DCWW Research Unit Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Dŵr Cymru – A summary of activities and responsibilities. .............................................................................. 6 1.3 The Not-for-Profit Business Model – Focusing on the future ............................................................................. 6 1.4 Dŵr Cymru operating area .......................................................................................................................................... 8 1.5 Dŵr Cymru’s procurement .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Detailed Water Cycle Strategy up to 2031 PDF 4 MB
    Public Document Pack Cambridge City Council DEVELOPMENT PLAN SCRUTINY SUB-COMMITTEE To: Councillors Ward (Chair), Znajek (Vice-Chair), Herbert, Pogonowski, Saunders and Tunnacliffe Alternates Councillors Dryden, Nimmo-Smith and Wright Despatched: Wednesday, 10 November 2010 Date: Tuesday, 16 November 2010 Time: 9.30 am Venue: Committee Room 1 & 2 - Guildhall Contact: Toni Birkin Direct Dial: AGENDA 8 DRAFT CAMBRIDGE WATER STRATEGY PHASE 2 (Pages 1 - 160) Appendices published as a supplements (Pages 1 - 160) i This page is intentionally left blank Agenda Item 8 Cambridgeshire Horizons Detailed Water Cycle Strategy up to 2031 Major Growth Areas in and around Cambridge Phase 2 – Detailed Strategy Choosing a water services infrastructure future October 2010 Halcrow Group Limited Halcrow Group Limited Endeavour House Forder Way Cygnet Park Hampton Peterborough Cambridgeshire pe7 8gx England Tel +44 (0)1733 560033 Fax +44 (0)1733 427988 www.halcrow.com Halcrow Group Limited has prepared this report in accordance with the instructions of their client, Cambridgeshire Horizons, for their sole and specific use. Any other persons who use any information contained herein do so at their own risk. © Halcrow Group Limited 2010 1 Page 1 Cambridgeshire Horizons Detailed Water Cycle Strategy up to 2031 Major Growth Areas in and around Cambridge Contents Amendment Record This report has been issued and amended as follows: Issue Revision Description Date Signed 3 0 Final report 08.08.10 EJG 3 1 Revised final report 29.10.10 AJC Page 2 2 Cambridge (and surrounding major growth areas) WCS Phase 2 Executive Summary A significant number of new homes are planned for Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire before 2031.
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    S AV I N G Water f A THE NRA'S APPROACH TO WATER CONSERVATION & DEMAND MANAGEMENT Se p t e m b e r 1995 CONSULTATION REPORT NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY “ The NRA strongly encourages water companies and other major abstractors to adopt policies and procedures that result in the efficient use of water in their operations and by the public, through a balanced approach combining water conservation and demand management with phased traditional source development where appropriate. Balanced policies will have regard to both cost to customers and environmental impact. ” THE NRA AND THE ENVIRONMENT AGENCY The National Rivers Authority will form the major part of a new organisation which will have responsibilities for the environmental protection of water, land and air. The new Environment Agency starts its work of managing the environment in England and Wales on 1 April 1996. A)&4 t A ) 4 S ’) P r e f a c e BACKGROUND The Environment Agency is due to come into being in 1996. As one of the existing bodies that will make up the new Agency the National Rivers Authority’s (NRA) policies for sustainable development and water conservation will take on a greater significance. Conservation of water resources involves the co-operation of Government, the regulators, the water industry, agriculture, industry and the general public. The NRA as ‘Guardians of the Water Environment’ is intent upon ensuring that water resources are used effectively and efficiently and not wasted. This consultation report reviews current water conservation and demand management practices both in the UK and overseas, and establishes the potential for saving water in England and Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • 40 Innovation in the Water Industry in England and Wales
    Innovation in the water industry in England and Wales FINAL REPORT Cave Review of competition and innovation in water markets Prepared by London Economics February 2009 Innovation in the water industry in England and Wales Final Report Cave Review of competition and innovation in water markets Prepared by London Economics February 2009 © Copyright London Economics. No part of this document may be used or reproduced without London Economics’ express permission in writing. Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction 20 1.1 Project objectives 20 1.2 Structure of the report 20 2 Definition of innovation 22 2.1 Review of innovation definitions from the international literature 22 2.2 Definition of innovation for the purpose of this study 24 3 International comparisons 27 3.1 Cross-country comparison of R&D expenditure 28 3.2 Data on Patents 34 3.3 Conclusions 37 4 Survey of water and sewerage companies 38 4.1 Methodological approach 38 4.2 The innovation questionnaire 39 5 Findings from the survey of water companies 41 5.1 Innovation input measures 41 5.2 Innovation output measures 56 5.3 Benchmarking water and sewerage companies 58 6 Contractor survey 64 6.1 Innovation inputs 64 6.2 Innovation outputs 66 7 Competition upstream and in retail services 68 8 Barriers to innovation and recommendations 71 8.1 Regulatory co-ordination and common agency 71 iii Table of Contents Page 8.2 Flexible environmental and natural resource incentives 75 8.3 Return on investment 82 8.4 Road testing tools for policy 85 9 References 89 Annex 1 R&D data 91 Annex 2 Summary of output measures 93 Annex 3 Reproduction of the innovation questionnaire 99 Annex 4 Comments from questionnaire testing stage 111 iv Tables & Figures Page Table 1: Water companies R&D expenditure rankings (total expenditure and as % of turnover) 11 Table 2: Innovation Summary Table.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Significant Changes 2021-22 Indicative Wholesale Non-Household Charges
    ST Classification: UNMARKED Statement of significant changes 2021-22 Indicative Wholesale Non-Household Charges There will be modest increases or reductions for the majority of non-households in our area next year. You can read more about why bills are changing further on in this document. Illustrative bills – wholesale non-household Typical customers will see different bill changes depending on whether they are metered or unmetered and the amount of water they use. Illustrative bill changes for a range of customers are set out below. Wholesale bills for typical customers (all areas except Chester) 20-21 21-22 Incr £ per Wholesale Water Waste Total Water Waste Total % month Unmetered Low £79 £86 £165 £76 £78 £154 -7.1% -£1.00 Average £170 £179 £349 £168 £156 £324 -7.2% -£2.00 High £262 £271 £533 £260 £234 £494 -7.2% -£3.25 Metered V Small (60m3) £105 £163 £268 £108 £171 £279 4.1% +£1.00 Small (120m3) £257 £261 £518 £261 £268 £528 2.0% +£0.75 1,000m3 £1,537 £1,237 £2,774 £1,546 £1,231 £2,777 0.1% +£0.25 5,000m3 £7,621 £6,752 £14,373 £7,662 £6,678 £14,341 -0.2% -£2.75 25,000m3 £33,030 £29,751 £62,781 £33,098 £29,381 £62,479 -0.5% -£25.25 75,000m3 £82,395 £86,768 £169,163 £83,489 £85,665 £169,154 -0.0% -£0.75 Trade effluent Small (120m3) £257 £298 £554 £261 £302 £563 1.6% +£0.75 1,000m3 £1,537 £1,077 £2,614 £1,546 £1,069 £2,615 0.1% <£0.25 5,000m3 £7,621 £5,655 £13,276 £7,662 £5,581 £13,243 -0.2% -£2.75 25,000m3 £33,030 £23,970 £57,000 £33,098 £23,606 £56,704 -0.5% -£24.75 Band T 1,000m3 £1,537 £1,249 £2,786 £1,546 £1,309 £2,855 2.5% +£5.75 5,000m3 £7,621 £5,163 £12,784 £7,662 £5,169 £12,831 0.4% +£4.00 Note that these are all wholesale bills for retailers.
    [Show full text]
  • Drinking Water Quality, Second Edition
    This page intentionally left blank Drinking Water Quality This textbook provides a comprehensive review of the problems associated with the supply of drinking water in the developed world. Since the first edition of this book was published there have been enormous changes in the water industry, especially in the way drinking water is perceived and regulated. Water companies and regulators have been presented with numerous new challenges – global warming has seriously affected the sustainability of water supplies as well as impacting water quality; advances in chemical and microbial analysis have revealed many new contaminants in water that were previously undetectable or unknown; and recent terrorist attacks have demonstrated how vulnerable water supplies could be to contamination or disruption. This new edition is an overview of the current and emerging problems, and what can be done to solve them. It has been completely updated, and includes the new WHO Revised Drinking Water Guidelines. Drinking Water Quality is an ideal textbook for courses in environmental science, hydrology, environmental health, and environmental engineering. It also provides an authoritative reference for practitioners and professionals in the water supply industry. N. F. GRAY is a Professor at the Centre for the Environment at Trinity College, Dublin. He has worked in the area of water technology for 30 years, and is internationally known as a lecturer and author in water quality and pollution control. His research specializes in the operational problems associated with supplying drinking water and treating wastewaters. Drinking Water Quality Second Edition N. F. Gray University of Dublin CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521878258 © N.
    [Show full text]
  • Glas Cymru Holdings Cyfyngedig | Annual Report & Accounts Glas Cymru Holdings Cyfyngedig | Annual Report & Accounts Chairman’S Statement | 5
    G L A S CYMRU REPORT & ACCOUNTS 2017—2018 CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT 4 STRATEGIC REPORT 8 CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REVIEW 10 OUR HISTORY: WHO WE ARE 14 HOW WE DO IT 15 HAVING YOUR SAY 16 CHATBOT INNOVATION 17 YEAR IN REVIEW: 2017-18 18 EXTREME WEATHER — OUR CHALLENGE 20 HOW WE’RE DOING 22 OUR DIRECTORS 40 OUR REGULATORS AND KEY STAKEHOLDERS 42 OUR APPROACH TO RISK MANAGEMENT 43 KEY RISKS FACED BY THE GROUP 44 LONG-TERM VIABILITY STATEMENT 48 GOVERNANCE REPORT 50 CHAIRMAN’S INTRODUCTION 52 OUR CORPORATE STRUCTURE 53 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 54 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 57 INTERNAL CONTROL 63 REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE 64 END OF YEAR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 65 QUALITY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE REPORT 67 NOMINATIONS COMMITTEE REPORT 68 FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT 68 REMUNERATION COMMITTEE REPORT 69 POLICY REPORT 72 ANNUAL REPORT ON REMUNERATION 75 DIRECTORS' REPORT 83 FINANCIAL REVIEW AND RESULTS 95 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT 96 APPENDICES 134 GLOSSARY 135 MEASURES OF SUCCESS: DEFINITIONS 138 4 | CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT GLAS CYMRU HOLDINGS CYFYNGEDIG | ANNUAL REPORT & ACCOUNTS GLAS CYMRU HOLDINGS CYFYNGEDIG | ANNUAL REPORT & ACCOUNTS CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT | 5 CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT I began writing this statement whilst returning home from our early March board meeting — its second day should have run in Swansea from 9am until 2pm: in fact it ran in Cardiff from 8:30am until 10am. That’s because 1st March turned out to be the worst day of winter weather since 2010 with a rare Met Office red weather warning in south Wales for snow. Our Executive Directors had more pressing operational matters to attend to than reporting on historical performance to the Board! I mention this because 1st March, and the subsequent days of harsh weather and following thaw, exemplified what makes the commitment of Welsh Water colleagues to our customers so special.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DEVELOPMENT of the WATER INDUSTRY in ENGLAND and WALES Cover Photograph: Ryburn Dam, Yorkshire
    THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE WATER INDUSTRY IN ENGLAND AND WALES Cover photograph: Ryburn Dam, Yorkshire. Courtesy of Yorkshire Water Services Limited. This document sets out our understanding of the development of, and of some of the legal provisions affecting, the water industry in England and Wales. Every reasonable effort has been made to make the information and any commentary accurate and up to date, but no responsibility for its accuracy and correctness, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed by the Office of Water Services. The information and commentary does not, and is not intended to, amount to legal advice to any person, nor is it a substitute for the relevant legal provision. Anyone in doubt about how they may be affected by any of the legal provisions referred to in the document should seek legal advice. CONTENTS 1. OVERVIEW 1 1.1 GOVERNMENT POLICY 1 1.2 EARLY CONSOLIDATION 1 1.3 RESTRUCTURING 2 1.4 PRIVATISATION 3 1.5 THE INDUSTRY TODAY 3 2. INITIAL CO-ORDINATION OF WATER RESOURCES IN ENGLAND & WALES 5 2.1 INTRODUCTION 5 2.1.1 Water supply 5 2.1.2 Sewerage & sewage disposal 6 2.1.3 Other interests in water resources 7 2.2 WATER RESOURCES ACT 1963 8 2.2.1 Background 8 2.2.2 River Authorities 8 2.2.3 Water Resources Board 9 2.2.4 Central government 9 2.3 MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES UNDER THE 1963 ACT 10 2.4 SERVICE DELIVERY 11 2.5 THE NEED FOR CHANGE 11 3. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE WATER AUTHORITIES 12 3.1 INTRODUCTION 12 3.2 WATER ACT 1973 12 3.2.1 Policy proposals 12 3.2.2 Functions of the water authorities 15 3.2.3 Financial arrangements 16 3.2.4 Constitution of the water authorities 16 3.2.5 Board structure 17 3.2.6 Role of central government 18 3.2.7 National Water Council 19 3.2.8 Household water bills 19 3.2.9 Statutory water companies 20 3.2.10 Pollution control 20 3.3 THE POST 1974 OPERATING ENVIRONMENT 22 3.3.1 Access to finance 22 3.3.2 Environmental performance 26 3.4 WATER ACT 1983 27 3.4.1 Constitutional changes 27 3.4.2 Financial changes 28 3.5 THE NEED FOR CHANGE 28 4.
    [Show full text]