DOCSLIB.ORG

Standards for Lagomorph, Rodent and Hyrax Sanctuaries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Standards for Lagomorph, Rodent and Hyrax Sanctuaries Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries Standards For Lagomorph, Rodent and Hyrax Sanctuaries Version: May 2016 ©2012 Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries – Standards for Lagomorph, Rodent and Hyrax Sanctuaries Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 1 GFAS PRINCIPLES ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 ANIMALS COVERED BY THESE STANDARDS ............................................................................................................. 1 STANDARDS UPDATES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 2 LAGOMORPH, RODENT AND HYRAX STANDARDS ............................................................................................... 3 LAGOMORPH, RODENT AND HYRAX HOUSING ........................................................................... 3 H-1. Types of Space and Size ................................................................................................................................. 3 H-2. Containment ................................................................................................................................................. 6 H-3. Ground and Plantings .................................................................................................................................... 8 H-4. Gates and Doors ............................................................................................................................................ 9 H-5. Shelter......................................................................................................................................................... 10 H-6. Enclosure Furniture ..................................................................................................................................... 11 H-7. Sanitation .................................................................................................................................................... 12 H-8. Temperature, Humidity, Ventilation, Lighting .............................................................................................. 14 PHYSICAL FACILITIES AND ADMINISTRATION ........................................................................ 16 PF-1. Overall Safety of Facilities .......................................................................................................................... 16 PF-2. Water Drainage and Testing ....................................................................................................................... 16 PF-3. Life Support ............................................................................................................................................... 16 PF-4. Hazardous Materials Handling ................................................................................................................... 17 PF-5. Security: Lagomorph, Rodent and Hyrax Enclosures ................................................................................... 17 PF-6. Perimeter Boundary and Inspections, and Maintenance ............................................................................ 18 PF-7. Security: General Safety Monitoring .......................................................................................................... 18 PF-8. Insect and Non-Resident Rodent Control ................................................................................................... 19 PF-9. Record Keeping .......................................................................................................................................... 19 PF-10. Animal Transport ..................................................................................................................................... 20 NUTRITION REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................................................... 21 N-1. Water .......................................................................................................................................................... 21 N-2. Diet ............................................................................................................................................................. 21 N-3. Food Presentation and Feeding Techniques ................................................................................................ 24 N-4. Food Storage ............................................................................................................................................... 25 N-5. Food Handling ............................................................................................................................................. 25 VETERINARY CARE ........................................................................................................................... 26 V-1. General Medical Program and Staffing ........................................................................................................ 26 V-2. On-Site and Off-Site Veterinary Facilities ..................................................................................................... 26 V-3. Preventative Medicine Program .................................................................................................................. 27 V-4. Clinical Pathology, Surgical, Treatment and Necropsy Facilities ................................................................... 27 V-5. Quarantine and Isolation of Lagomorphs, Rodents and Hyrax...................................................................... 29 i Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries – Standards for Lagomorph, Rodent and Hyrax Sanctuaries V-6. Medical Records and Controlled Substances................................................................................................ 30 V-7. Breeding/Contraception .............................................................................................................................. 31 V-8. Zoonotic Disease Program ........................................................................................................................... 32 WELL-BEING AND HANDLING OF LAGOMORPHS, RODENTS AND HYRAX ...................... 32 W-1. Physical Well-Being .................................................................................................................................... 32 W-2. Social Housing ............................................................................................................................................ 33 W-3. Introduction of Unfamiliar Individuals ........................................................................................................ 34 W-4. Behavioral/Psychological Well-Being .......................................................................................................... 35 W-5. Lagomorph, Rodent,Hyrax-Caregiver Relationships .................................................................................... 36 W-6. Handling and Restraint ............................................................................................................................... 36 STAFFING ............................................................................................................................................. 37 GENERAL STAFFING................................................................................................................................................ 37 S-1. General Staffing Considerations ................................................................................................................... 37 S-2. Security and Emergency Coverage ............................................................................................................... 38 S-3. Volunteer and Internship Programs ............................................................................................................. 38 S-4. Manuals ....................................................................................................................................................... 38 S-5. Employee Training and Continuing Education .............................................................................................. 40 SAFETY POLICIES, PROTOCOLS AND TRAINING ...................................................................................................... 40 S-6. General Staff Safety ..................................................................................................................................... 40 S-7. Communication System ............................................................................................................................... 40 S-8. Emergency Response Plans and Protocols .................................................................................................... 40 S-9. Escaped Lagomorph, Rodent and Hyrax Protocol ......................................................................................... 41 S-10. Emergency Training ................................................................................................................................... 41 S-11. Firearm Policy ............................................................................................................................................ 42 S-12. Firearm Training
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identifing Priority Ecoregions for Rodent Conservation at the Genus Level
    Oryx Vol 35 No 2 April 2001 Short Communication Identifing priority ecoregions for rodent conservation at the genus level Giovanni Amori and Spartaco Gippoliti Abstract Rodents account for 40 per cent of living high number of genera) 'threat-spots' for rodent conser- mammal species. Nevertheless, despite an increased vation. A few regions, mainly drylands, are singled out interest in biodiversity conservation and their high as important areas for rodent conservation but are not species richness, Rodentia are often neglected by con- generally recognized in global biodiversity assessments. servationists. We attempt for the first time a world-wide These are the remaining forests of Togo, extreme evaluation of rodent conservation priorities at the genus 'western Sahel', the Turanian and Mongolian-Manchu- level. Given the low popularity of the order, we rian steppes and the desert of the Horn of Africa. considered it desirable to discuss identified priorities Resources for conservation must be allocated first to within the framework of established biodiversity prior- recognized threat spots and to those restricted-range ity areas of the world. Two families and 62 genera are genera which may depend on species-specific strategies recognized as threatened. Our analyses highlight the for their survival. Philippines, New Guinea, Sulawesi, the Caribbean, China temperate forests and the Atlantic Forest of Keywords Biodiversity, conservation priorities, south-eastern Brazil as the most important (for their rodents, threatened genera, world ecoregions. Conservation efforts for rodents must be included in Introduction the general framework of mammalian diversity conser- With 26-32 recognized extant families and more than vation, focusing on a biodiversity/area approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleistocene Mammals and Paleoecology of the Western Amazon
    PLEISTOCENE MAMMALS AND PALEOECOLOGY OF THE WESTERN AMAZON By ALCEU RANCY A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1991 . To Cleusa, Bianca, Tiago, Thomas, and Nono Saul (Pistolin de Oro) . ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work received strong support from John Eisenberg (chairman) and David Webb, both naturalists, humanists, and educators. Both were of special value, contributing more than the normal duties as members of my committee. Bruce MacFadden provided valuable insights at several periods of uncertainty. Ronald Labisky and Kent Redford also provided support and encouragement. My field work in the western Amazon was supported by several grants from the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) , and the Universidade Federal do Acre (UFAC) , Brazil. I also benefitted from grants awarded to Ken Campbell and Carl Frailey from the National Science Foundation (NSF) I thank Daryl Paul Domning, Jean Bocquentin Villanueva, Jonas Pereira de Souza Filho, Ken Campbell, Jose Carlos Rodrigues dos Santos, David Webb, Jorge Ferigolo, Carl Frailey, Ernesto Lavina, Michael Stokes, Marcondes Costa, and Ricardo Negri for sharing with me fruitful and adventurous field trips along the Amazonian rivers. The CNPq and the Universidade Federal do Acre, supported my visit to the. following institutions (and colleagues) to examine their vertebrate collections: iii . ; ; Universidade do Amazonas, Manaus
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of the Extinct Hutia in Cave Deposits of Isla De Mona, P.R. by Ángel M
    In Search of the Extinct Hutia in Cave Deposits of Isla de Mona, P.R. by Ángel M. Nieves-Rivera, M.S. and Donald A. McFarlane, Ph.D. Isolobodon portoricensis, the extinct have been domesticated, and its abundant (14C) date was obtained on charcoal and Puerto Rican hutia (a large guinea-pig like remains in kitchen middens indicate that it bone fragments from Cueva Negra, rodent), was about the size of the surviving formed part of the diet for the early settlers associated with hutia bones (Frank, 1998). Hispaniolan hutia Plagiodontia (Rodentia: (Nowak, 1991; Flemming and MacPhee, This analysis yielded an uncorrected 14C age Capromydae). Isolobodon portoricensis was 1999). This species of hutia was extinct, of 380 ±60 before present, and a corrected originally reported from Cueva Ceiba (next apparently shortly after the coming of calendar age of 1525 AD, (1 sigma range to Utuado, P.R.) in 1916 by J. A. Allen (1916), European explorers, according to most 1480-1655 AD). This date coincides with the and it is known today only by skeletal remains historians. final occupation of Isla de Mona by the Taino from Hispaniola (Dominican Republic, Haiti, The first person to take an interest in the Indians (1578 AD; Wadsworth 1977). The Île de la Gonâve, ÎIe de la Tortue), Puerto faunal remains of the caves of Isla de Mona purpose of this article is to report some new Rico (mainland, Isla de Mona, Caja de was mammalogist Harold E. Anthony, who paleontological discoveries of the Puerto Muertos, Vieques), the Virgin Islands (St. in 1926 collected the first Puerto Rican hutia Rican hutia in cave deposits of Isla de Mona Croix, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Activity Pattern of Medium and Large Sized Mammals and Density Estimates of Cuniculus Paca (Rodentia: Cuniculidae) in the Brazilian Pampa C
    Brazilian Journal of Biology http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.174403 ISSN 1519-6984 (Print) Original Article ISSN 1678-4375 (Online) Activity pattern of medium and large sized mammals and density estimates of Cuniculus paca (Rodentia: Cuniculidae) in the Brazilian Pampa C. Leuchtenbergera*, Ê. S. de Oliveirab, L. P. Cariolattoc and C. B. Kasperb aInstituto Federal Farroupilha – IFFAR, Coordenação de Ciências Biológicas, Rua Erechim, nº 860, Campus Panambi, CEP 98280-000, Panambi, RS, Brazil bUniversidade Federal do Pampa – UNIPAMPA, Laboratório de Biologia de Mamíferos e Aves – LABIMAVE, Av. Antônio Trilha, nº 1847, CEP 97300-000, São Gabriel, RS, Brazil cInstituto Federal Farroupilha – IFFAR, RS-377, Km 27, Campus Alegrete, Passo Novo, CEP 97555-000, Alegrete, RS, Brazil *e-mail: [email protected] Received: January 13, 2017 – Accepted: June 26, 2017 – Distributed: November 30, 2018 (With 2 figures) Abstract Between July 2014 and April 2015, we conducted weekly inventories of the circadian activity patterns of mammals in Passo Novo locality, municipality of Alegrete, southern Brazil. The vegetation is comprised by a grassy-woody steppe (grassland). We used two camera traps alternately located on one of four 1 km transects, each separated by 1 km. We classified the activity pattern of species by the percentage of photographic records taken in each daily period. We identify Cuniculus paca individuals by differences in the patterns of flank spots. We then estimate the density 1) considering the area of riparian forest present in the sampling area, and 2) through capture/recapture analysis. Cuniculus paca, Conepatus chinga and Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris were nocturnal, Cerdocyon thous had a crepuscular/nocturnal pattern, while Mazama gouazoubira was cathemeral.
    [Show full text]
  • Afrotherian Conservation – Number 16
    AFROTHERIAN CONSERVATION Newsletter of the IUCN/SSC Afrotheria Specialist Group Number 16 Edited by PJ Stephenson September 2020 Afrotherian Conservation is published annually by the measure the effectiveness of SSC’s actions on biodiversity IUCN Species Survival Commission Afrotheria Specialist conservation, identification of major new initiatives Group to promote the exchange of news and information needed to address critical conservation issues, on the conservation of, and applied research into, consultations on developing policies, guidelines and aardvarks, golden moles, hyraxes, otter shrews, sengis and standards, and increasing visibility and public awareness of tenrecs. the work of SSC, its network and key partners. Remarkably, 2020 marks the end of the current IUCN Published by IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. quadrennium, which means we will be dissolving the © 2020 International Union for Conservation of Nature membership once again in early 2021, then reassembling it and Natural Resources based on feedback from our members. I will be in touch ISSN: 1664-6754 with all members at the relevant time to find out who wishes to remain a member and whether there are any Find out more about the Group people you feel should be added to our group. No one is on our website at http://afrotheria.net/ASG.html automatically re-admitted, however, so you will all need to and on Twitter @Tweeting_Tenrec actively inform me of your wishes. We will very likely need to reassess the conservation status of all our species during the next quadrennium, so get ready for another round of Red Listing starting Message from the Chair sometime in the not too distant future.
    [Show full text]
  • Dolichotis Patagonum (CAVIOMORPHA; CAVIIDAE; DOLICHOTINAE) Mastozoología Neotropical, Vol
    Mastozoología Neotropical ISSN: 0327-9383 ISSN: 1666-0536 [email protected] Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos Argentina Silva Climaco das Chagas, Karine; Vassallo, Aldo I; Becerra, Federico; Echeverría, Alejandra; Fiuza de Castro Loguercio, Mariana; Rocha-Barbosa, Oscar LOCOMOTION IN THE FASTEST RODENT, THE MARA Dolichotis patagonum (CAVIOMORPHA; CAVIIDAE; DOLICHOTINAE) Mastozoología Neotropical, vol. 26, no. 1, 2019, -June, pp. 65-79 Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos Argentina Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45762554005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Mastozoología Neotropical, 26(1):65-79, Mendoza, 2019 Copyright ©SAREM, 2019 Versión on-line ISSN 1666-0536 http://www.sarem.org.ar https://doi.org/10.31687/saremMN.19.26.1.0.06 http://www.sbmz.com.br Artículo LOCOMOTION IN THE FASTEST RODENT, THE MARA Dolichotis patagonum (CAVIOMORPHA; CAVIIDAE; DOLICHOTINAE) Karine Silva Climaco das Chagas1, 2, Aldo I. Vassallo3, Federico Becerra3, Alejandra Echeverría3, Mariana Fiuza de Castro Loguercio1 and Oscar Rocha-Barbosa1, 2 1 Laboratório de Zoologia de Vertebrados - Tetrapoda (LAZOVERTE), Departamento de Zoologia, IBRAG, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. 2 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Evolução do Instituto de Biologia/Uerj. 3 Laboratorio de Morfología Funcional y Comportamiento. Departamento de Biología; Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (CONICET); Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata.
    [Show full text]
  • Relative Rates of Molecular Evolution in Rodents and Their Symbionts
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1997 Relative Rates of Molecular Evolution in Rodents and Their yS mbionts. Theresa Ann Spradling Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Spradling, Theresa Ann, "Relative Rates of Molecular Evolution in Rodents and Their yS mbionts." (1997). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 6527. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/6527 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type o f computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. hi the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • (Rodentia: Ctenodactylidae) from the Miocene of Israel
    RESEARCH ARTICLE A Transitional Gundi (Rodentia: Ctenodactylidae) from the Miocene of Israel Raquel López-Antoñanzas1,2*, Vitaly Gutkin3, Rivka Rabinovich4, Ran Calvo5, Aryeh Grossman6,7 1 School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom, 2 Departamento de Paleobiología, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales-CSIC, Madrid, Spain, 3 The Harvey M. Krueger Family Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel, 4 National Natural History Collections, Institute of Earth Sciences and Institute of Archaeology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel, 5 Geological Survey of Israel, Jerusalem, Israel, 6 Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, United States of America, 7 School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS We describe a new species of gundi (Rodentia: Ctenodactylidae: Ctenodactylinae), Sayi- mys negevensis, on the basis of cheek teeth from the Early Miocene of the Rotem Basin, Citation: López-Antoñanzas R, Gutkin V, Rabinovich R, Calvo R, Grossman A (2016) A Transitional Gundi southern Israel. The Rotem ctenodactylid differs from all known ctenodactylid species, (Rodentia: Ctenodactylidae) from the Miocene of including Sayimys intermedius, which was first described from the Middle Miocene of Saudi Israel. PLoS ONE 11(4): e0151804. doi:10.1371/ Arabia. Instead, it most resembles Sayimys baskini from the Early Miocene of Pakistan in journal.pone.0151804 characters of the m1-2 (e.g., the mesoflexid shorter than the metaflexid, the obliquely orien- Editor: Laurent Viriot, Team 'Evolution of Vertebrate tated hypolophid, and the presence of a strong posterolabial ledge) and the upper molars Dentition', FRANCE (e.g., the paraflexus that is longer than the metaflexus).
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Molecular Evidences for a Living Mammalian Fossil
    Multiple molecular evidences for a living mammalian fossil Dorothe´ e Huchon†‡, Pascale Chevret§¶, Ursula Jordanʈ, C. William Kilpatrick††, Vincent Ranwez§, Paulina D. Jenkins‡‡, Ju¨ rgen Brosiusʈ, and Ju¨ rgen Schmitz‡ʈ †Department of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel; §Department of Paleontology, Phylogeny, and Paleobiology, Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution, cc064, Universite´Montpellier II, Place E. Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France; ʈInstitute of Experimental Pathology, University of Mu¨nster, D-48149 Mu¨nster, Germany; ††Department of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405-0086; and ‡‡Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom Edited by Francisco J. Ayala, University of California, Irvine, CA, and approved March 18, 2007 (received for review February 11, 2007) Laonastes aenigmamus is an enigmatic rodent first described in their classification as a diatomyid suggests that Laonastes is a 2005. Molecular and morphological data suggested that it is the living fossil and a ‘‘Lazarus taxon.’’ sole representative of a new mammalian family, the Laonastidae, The two research teams also disagreed on the taxonomic and a member of the Hystricognathi. However, the validity of this position of Laonastes. According to Jenkins et al. (2), Laonastes family is controversial because fossil-based phylogenetic analyses is either the most basal group of the hystricognaths (Fig. 2A)or suggest that Laonastes is a surviving member of the Diatomyidae, nested within the hystricognaths (Fig. 2B). According to Dawson a family considered to have been extinct for 11 million years. et al. (3), Laonastes and the other Diatomyidae are the sister According to these data, Laonastes and Diatomyidae are the sister clade of the family Ctenodactylidae (i.e., gundies), a family that clade of extant Ctenodactylidae (i.e., gundies) and do not belong does not belong to the Hystricognathi, but to which it is to the Hystricognathi.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Poisoning of Foxes and Buzzards
    Pergamon Chemosphere, Vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 1817-1829, 1997 © 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd All rights reserved. Printed in Great Britain PII: S0045-6535(97)00242-7 0045-6535197 $17.00+0.00 FIELD EVIDENCE OF SECONDARY POISONING OF FOXES (Vulpes vulpes) AND BUZZARDS (Buteo buteo) BY BROMADIOLONE, A 4-YEAR SURVEY Philippe J. Berny*, Thierry Buronfosse*, Florence Buronfosse**, Franqois Lamarque °and Guy Lorgue* * D6pt.SBFA - Laboratoire de Toxicologie - ENVL - BP-83 - 69280 Marcy l'Etoile (France) ** CNITV - ENVL - BP-83 - 69280 Marcy l'Etoile (France) ° ONC - Domaine de St Benotst - 78160 Auffargis (France) (Received in USA 17 February 1997; accepted 21 March 1997) Abstract This paper presents the result of a 4 year survey in France (1991-1994) based on the activity of a wildlife disease surveillance network (SAGIR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the detrimental effects of anticoagulant (Ac) rodenticides in non-target wild animals. Ac poisoning accounted for a very limited number of the identified causes of death (1-3%) in most species. Predators (mainly foxes and buzzards) were potentially exposed to anticoagulant compounds (especially bromadiolone) via contaminated prey in some instances. The liver concentrations of bromadiolone residues were elevated and species-specific diagnostic values were determined. These values were quite similar to those reported in the litterature when secondary anticoagulant poisoning was experimentally assessed. ©1997 Elsevier Science Ltd Introduction This study reports anticoagulant (Ac) poisoning in wildlife. The Toxicology Laboratory of the Veterinary school in Lyon is involved in a unique nation-wide network for wildlife diseases surveillance (see material and methods). Ac poisoning is seldom described or investigated in wild animals, despite extensive use of rodenticides in the fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix Lagomorph Species: Geographical Distribution and Conservation Status
    Appendix Lagomorph Species: Geographical Distribution and Conservation Status PAULO C. ALVES1* AND KLAUS HACKLÄNDER2 Lagomorph taxonomy is traditionally controversy, and as a consequence the number of species varies according to different publications. Although this can be due to the conservative characteristic of some morphological and genetic traits, like general shape and number of chromosomes, the scarce knowledge on several species is probably the main reason for this controversy. Also, some species have been discovered only recently, and from others we miss any information since they have been first described (mainly in pikas). We struggled with this difficulty during the work on this book, and decide to include a list of lagomorph species (Table 1). As a reference, we used the recent list published by Hoffmann and Smith (2005) in the “Mammals of the world” (Wilson and Reeder, 2005). However, to make an updated list, we include some significant published data (Friedmann and Daly 2004) and the contribu- tions and comments of some lagomorph specialist, namely Andrew Smith, John Litvaitis, Terrence Robinson, Andrew Smith, Franz Suchentrunk, and from the Mexican lagomorph association, AMCELA. We also include sum- mary information about the geographical range of all species and the current IUCN conservation status. Inevitably, this list still contains some incorrect information. However, a permanently updated lagomorph list will be pro- vided via the World Lagomorph Society (www.worldlagomorphsociety.org). 1 CIBIO, Centro de Investigaça˜o em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos and Faculdade de Ciˆencias, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vaira˜o 4485-661 – Vaira˜o, Portugal 2 Institute of Wildlife Biology and Game Management, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-Str.
    [Show full text]
  • Melo-Ferreira J, Lemos De Matos A, Areal H, Lissovski A, Carneiro M, Esteves PJ (2015) The
    1 This is the Accepted version of the following article: 2 Melo-Ferreira J, Lemos de Matos A, Areal H, Lissovski A, Carneiro M, Esteves PJ (2015) The 3 phylogeny of pikas (Ochotona) inferred from a multilocus coalescent approach. Molecular 4 Phylogenetics and Evolution 84, 240-244. 5 The original publication can be found here: 6 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790315000081 7 8 The phylogeny of pikas (Ochotona) inferred from a multilocus coalescent approach 9 10 José Melo-Ferreiraa,*, Ana Lemos de Matosa,b, Helena Areala,b, Andrey A. Lissovskyc, Miguel 11 Carneiroa, Pedro J. Estevesa,d 12 13 aCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, 14 InBIO, Laboratório Associado, Campus Agrário de Vairão, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal 15 bDepartamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, 4099-002 Porto, 16 Portugal 17 cZoological Museum of Moscow State University, B. Nikitskaya, 6, Moscow 125009, Russia 18 dCITS, Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias da Saúde, IPSN, CESPU, Gandra, Portugal 19 20 *Corresponding author: José Melo-Ferreira. CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e provided by Repositório Aberto da Universidade do Porto View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk CORE brought to you by 21 Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus Agrário de 22 Vairão, 4485-661 Vairão. Phone: +351 252660411. E-mail: [email protected]. 23 1 1 Abstract 2 3 The clarification of the systematics of pikas (genus Ochotona) has been hindered by largely 4 overlapping morphological characters among species and the lack of a comprehensive molecular 5 phylogeny.
    [Show full text]