DOCSLIB.ORG

Knik Arm Crossing Engineering Feasibility and Cost Estimate Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Knik Arm Crossing Engineering Feasibility and Cost Estimate Update Knik Arm Crossing Engineering Feasibility and Cost Estimate Update State Project No. 56047 Volume 2 Technology Update Prepared for: Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Prepared by: Parsons Brinckerhoff HDR Alaska, Inc. In affiliation with: Fugro West, Inc. ASCG, Inc. Black-Smith & Richards Shannon & Wilson, Inc. TY Lin International EKM Engineering, Inc. (sub to TY Lin International) Word Wrangling, Inc. January 31, 2003 Knik Arm Crossing Engineering Feasibility and Cost Estimate Update State Project No. 56047 Volume 2 Technology Update Prepared for: Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Prepared by: Parsons Brinckerhoff/HDR Alaska, Inc. In affiliation with: Fugro West, Inc. ASCG, Inc. Black-Smith & Richards Shannon & Wilson, Inc. TY Lin International EKM Engineering, Inc. (sub to TY Lin International) Word Wrangling January 31, 2003 Volume 2: Technology Update 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 SOUTH APPROACH............................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 KNIK ARM CROSSING.......................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 NORTH APPROACH .............................................................................................. 1-2 2.0 GEOTECHNICAL AND FOUNDATION UPDATE......................................................... 2-1 2.1 SUMMARY.............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 GEOTECHNICAL AND FOUNDATION ANALYSIS .......................................... 2-2 2.2.1 Bridge Crossing ............................................................................................. 2-2 2.2.2 Ship Creek Crossing Soils.............................................................................. 2-3 2.2.3 Government Hill Soils ................................................................................... 2-4 2.3 SEISMIC DESIGN UPDATE .................................................................................. 2-4 2.3.1 Previous Seismic Analyses ............................................................................ 2-4 2.3.2 Recent Regional Seismicity ........................................................................... 2-5 2.4 BRIDGE FOUNDATION CONSIDERATIONS..................................................... 2-5 2.4.1 Piers Description............................................................................................ 2-5 2.4.1.1 Subsurface Conditions ........................................................................ 2-6 2.4.2 Pile Size and Hammers Considered ............................................................... 2-8 2.4.3 Methodology.................................................................................................. 2-8 2.5 CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................... 2-9 2.5.1 Design Development Considerations........................................................... 2-14 2.6 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS.............................................................. 2-14 2.7 ABUTMENT AND HIGHWAY EMBANKMENT CONSIDERATIONS ........... 2-15 2.7.1 Bridge Over Ship Creek............................................................................... 2-15 2.7.2 Government Hill Landslide.......................................................................... 2-16 2.7.3 Cut-and Cover Tunnel through Government Hill ........................................ 2-16 2.7.4 Port of Anchorage........................................................................................ 2-17 2.7.5 Shoreline Embankment................................................................................ 2-17 2.7.6 Abutment Bluffs........................................................................................... 2-18 2.7.7 Pavement Section......................................................................................... 2-19 2.8 CLOSURE .............................................................................................................. 2-20 2.8.1 Use of Design Information........................................................................... 2-20 2.8.2 Potential Variation in Subsurface Conditions.............................................. 2-20 3.0 STRUCTURE TYPE UPDATE .......................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 SUMMARY.............................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 ANALYSIS............................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.1 Hybrid Alignment .......................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.2 Superstructure ................................................................................................ 3-1 3.2.2.1 Material ............................................................................................... 3-3 3.2.2.2 Railroad Options ................................................................................. 3-3 3.2.2.3 Road-Only Option............................................................................... 3-6 3.2.2.4 Construction........................................................................................ 3-8 3.2.3 Piers ............................................................................................................. 3-12 3.2.4 Pile Caps ...................................................................................................... 3-13 3.2.5 Piles.............................................................................................................. 3-17 3.2.6 Loads............................................................................................................ 3-18 3.2.6.1 Live Load.......................................................................................... 3-18 3.2.6.2 Earthquake ........................................................................................ 3-19 Page i Volume 2: Technology Update 3.2.6.3 Ice...................................................................................................... 3-23 3.2.7 Knik Arm Oceanographic Conditions.......................................................... 3-24 3.2.7.1 Tides.................................................................................................. 3-24 3.2.7.2 Currents............................................................................................. 3-24 3.2.7.3 Scour ................................................................................................. 3-25 3.2.7.4 Waves................................................................................................ 3-26 3.2.8 Feasibility and Cost...................................................................................... 3-26 3.2.8.1 Comparable Projects ......................................................................... 3-26 3.2.8.2 Cost Breakdown................................................................................ 3-28 3.2.9 Conclusion ................................................................................................... 3-30 4.0 TUNNEL TECHNOLOGY AND ALTERNATIVES......................................................... 4-1 4.1 SUMMARY.............................................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 TUNNEL TECHNOLOGY UPDATE AND ASSUMPTION ................................. 4-1 4.2.1 Immersed Tube Tunnels................................................................................. 4-1 4.2.2 Soft-Ground Bored Tunnels........................................................................... 4-3 4.2.3 Tunnel Bores in Coarse-Grained Soils........................................................... 4-6 4.2.4 Tunneling Bores in Fine- and Coarse-Grained Soils ..................................... 4-7 4.3 TUNNEL BORING MACHINES ............................................................................ 4-7 4.3.1 Slurry-Pressure Balance Machines ................................................................ 4-7 4.3.2 Earth-Pressure Balance Machine ................................................................... 4-8 4.3.3 Cutter Head Wear .......................................................................................... 4-9 4.3.4 Tunnel Support............................................................................................... 4-9 4.3.5 Tunnel Tour ................................................................................................. 4-10 4.3.5.1 Tunnel Tour Findings........................................................................ 4-10 4.4 ANALYSIS............................................................................................................. 4-11 4.4.1 Crossing Location and Geologic Setting ..................................................... 4-11 4.4.2 Design Criteria............................................................................................. 4-13 4.4.2.1 Fire and Life Safety Standards and Codes ........................................ 4-13 4.4.2.2 Lighting Standards and Codes .......................................................... 4-13 4.4.2.3 Ventilation and Emergency Egress Standards and Codes................. 4-14 4.4.3
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Upper Knik Arm Wetlands
    UPPER KNIK ARM WETLANDS A proposal for designation as an Area Meriting Special Attention Prepared by: David M. Dall Jon R. Nickles United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service November 1982 i Table of Contents (1) Introduction••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1 (2) Basis for Designation•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 2 (3) Maps and Description of Geographical Location•••••••••••••• 3 (4) Area Description........................................... 3 A. Dominant Physical Features •••••••••••••••••••• .'....... 3 B. Dominant Biological Features•••••••••••••••••••••••••• 7 (5) Current Land Use •....••.....•.......•....................... 9 A. Ownership • . • . • • . • • • . • • . • • • . • • • • . • • • • . • • . • • . 9 B. Jurisdication and Management Status ••••••••••••••••••• 9 c. Uses, Activities, and Proposed Developments••••••••••• 12 (6) Current and Proposed Use of Adjacent Lands and Waters •••••• 13 (7) Present and Anticipated Conflicts Among Uses and Activities Within or Adjacent to the Area ••••••••••••••••••••••• 14 (8) Proposed Management Scheme ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 14 (9) Recommendations ....•......••..•..•••.•..•.••••......••....• 14 A. Description of Proper and Improper Land and Water Uses Within the Area. • . • . • . 14 B. Summary and Statement of the Policies Applied to Management of the Area ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 16 c. Identification of Authorities Used to Implement the Proposed Management Scheme ••••••••••••••••••••••• 16 ii List of Figures gure 1. Knik Arm Wetlands
    [Show full text]
  • Signature Page TIDAL ESTUARY MORPHODYNAMICS of the KNIK
    Tidal Estuary Morphodynamics of the Knik Arm Item Type Report Authors Lewis, Steven E. Publisher University of Alaska Anchorage Download date 25/09/2021 15:25:58 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/5308 Signature Page TIDAL ESTUARY MORPHODYNAMICS OF THE KNIK ARM – ALASKA By Steven E. Lewis, P.E., B.S. RECOMMENDED: Thomas M. Ravens, Ph.D. Professor, College of Engineering Advisor He Liu, Ph.D. Professor, College of Engineering Advisory Committee Robert J. Lang, Ph.D. Professor and Chair, College of Engineering Advisory Committee Kenrick Mock, Ph.D. Associate Dean and Professor, College of Engineering APPROVED: David Yesner, Ph.D. Associate Dean, Graduate School Date TIDAL ESTUARY MORPHODYNAMICS OF THE KNIK ARM - ALASKA Title Page A PROJECT Presented to the Faculty of the University of Alaska Anchorage in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF CIVIL ENGINEERING By Steven E. Lewis, P.E., B.S. Anchorage, Alaska May 2015 iii Abstract A three-dimensional unsteady flow numerical model was developed to study sediment transport due to tidal circulation within Knik Arm, a dynamic well mixed macro-tidal sub-estuary of Cook Inlet in Alaska. The model was developed to gain a better understanding of the mechanisms that are creating the Point MacKenzie Shoal, located approximately 4 kilometers south of Port MacKenzie. Hydrodynamic conditions within the estuary are very complex in that ebb-and-flood tides, freshwater mixing, and wetting/drying of tidal mud flats significantly effects sediment transport within the estuary. A Mike 3 numerical model was applied to simulate the sediment transport within the estuary under the action of tidal currents in the vicinity of the shoal.
    [Show full text]
  • Knik Arm Salmon Ecology Integrated Research Plan
    Knik Arm Anadromous Fish Study Designs Knik Arm Salmon Ecology Integrated Research Plan Prepared for: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Conservation Planning Assistance 605 W. 4th Ave Anchorage, AK 99501 Prepared by: HDR Alaska, Inc. 2525 C Street, Suite 305 Anchorage, AK 99503 January 26, 2010 Knik Arm Anadromous Fish Study Designs Knik Arm Salmon Ecology Integrated Research Plan Prepared for: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Conservation Planning Assistance 605 W. 4th Ave Anchorage, AK 99501 Preparers: James Brady – HDR Alaska Amanda Prevel-Ramos – HDR Alaska Scott Prevatte – HDR Alaska Jon Houghton, Ph.D. – Pentec Environmental Bridget Brown – HDR Alaska January 26, 2010 DISCLAIMER STATEMENT This report was prepared under contract to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor the USFWS make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for use, or the results of such use of any information contained herein. The views and opinions of authors expressed in this document do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or the USFWS. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Knik Arm Salmon Ecology Integrated Research Plan Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Susitna River Delta As Calving Ground: Evidence Form Observation
    The Susitna River Delta as a calving ground: Tamara McGuire1, Amber Stephens1, Brad Goetz 1,2 Evidence from observation of a Cook Inlet beluga birth 1. LGL Alaska Research Associates, Inc. 2000 West International Airport Road, St C1 and the 2005-2015 seasonal and Anchorage, Alaska, USA 99502 [email protected], [email protected] geographic patterns of neonaten 2. Kincaid Elementary School, Anchorage, Alaska. occurrence in Upper Cook Inlet. .. ·.. Little Susitna . ,· River Background . .. Birth Observed .:- Sitsi/tia._. RrJ~r The scientific literature has not identified if distinct calving grounds and calving ':·:·:::·:-_.:::· Delta·:: -::-:.. ·· .,. ···· ·· · . :: ·: ...... ..· ••· ,_.. :_ ......: .-:::.·-: ::.- -:-.·· ..... :-: ·--.. ...... :-- ·_ ..·. :-:-:_..- ·.: ·:··- :" : . ·.. _-' .-_. .-._.:-: _._· : ._.-_: ::- _: _: __::·: . :·.. :.-_:.·_ ·. ·.. - ::·/ .. -.·· :·- ·. .... ' . We observed a CIBW birth on July 20, 2015 in the Susitna River Delta, . :··. .·:: . ::·.:··:- .... • .·: ·.···.-... ... ..-.·:. ....... •• seasons exist for endangered Cook Inlet beluga whales (CIBW), as they do with other ...,- ... -.-.-·. .. ..·. KnikArm ·:·-···.·.· . ' .- :_::_·.·,.·. ·.·, ..•_. .:·-. -:· :, ·. -. '• .. : ... -.-;-· .. .. ··-:::-· ._._. ...... -.·: ..... ·.. ·.-·.::-. Upper Cook Inlet Alaska. beluga populations. Specific calving grounds or seasonal calving periods for CIBW . .. have not been designated because births in the wild have not been previously _'-_: :'": .-·.-·.:.:,:,- • The birth took place during low tide, in shallow waters (~1.3m)
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence from Peat Stratigraphy in Turnagain and Knik Arms
    PALEOSEISMICITY OF THE COOK INLET REGION, ALASKA: EVIDENCE FROM PEAT STRATIGRAPHY IN TURNAGAIN AND KNIK ARMS By R.A. Combellick Professional Report 112 Published by STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL & GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS 1991 PALEOSEISMICITY OF THE COOK INLET REGION, ALASKA: EVIDENCE FROM PEAT STRATIGRAPHY IN TURNAGAIN AND KNIK ARMS By R.A. Combellick Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys Professional Report 112 Fairbanks, Alaska 1991 STATE OF ALASKA Walter J. Hickel, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Harold C. Heinze, Commissioner DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL & GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS Thomas E. Smith, Director and State Geologist DGGS publications may be inspected at the following locations. Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys 794 University Avenue, Suite 200 400 Willoughby Avenue, 3rd floor Fairbanks, Alaska 99709-3645 Juneau, Alaska 99801-1796 U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center 605 West 4th Avenue, Room G684 4230 University Drive, Room 101 Anchorage, Alaska 99501-2299 Anchorage, Alaska 99508-4664 Address mail orders to the Fairbanks office. This publication, released by the Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, was produced and printed in Fairbanks, Alaska, at a cost of $5.00 per copy. Publication is required by Alaska Statute 41, "to determine the potential of Alaskan laud for production of metals, minerals, fuels, and geothermal resources; the location and supplies of groundwater and construction materials; the potential geologic hazards to buildings, roads, bridges, and other installations and structures; and shall conduct such other surveys and investigations as will advance knowledge of the geology of Alaska." d Cover: Portage area, Seward Highway, and upper Turnugain Arm in 1984, looking northwest.
    [Show full text]
  • Juvenile Pacific Salmon Use of Knik Arm Estuaries: a Literature Review
    Juvenile Pacific Salmon Use of Knik Arm Estuaries: A Literature Review Estuaries are known to provide several important functions for juvenile Pacific salmon. They act as a refuge from predators, an area for salinity adjustment, and a nursery for feeding and growth. The level of a juvenile salmon’s dependency on an estuary is determined by several factors including; the species, the size upon entry into the estuarine environment, the amount of available food within the estuary, the amount of available food within other associated nursery habitats, and the physical conditions of the estuary (Healy, 1982). The Knik Arm is a dynamic tidal estuary that supports five species of Pacific salmon. It is characterized by strong currents, large tidal flats, high suspended sediment loads, and seasonal ice substrate scouring (Prevel- Ramos et al. 2012). Previous research has been conducted within the lower portion of the Knik Arm (Dames and Moore 1983, and Houghton et al. 2005) as well as within the greater Cook Inlet (Abookire et. al., Blackburn, 1978, Moulton 1997, Nemeth et al. 2007, and Wolf et al. 1983) These studies have revealed some important information as to how the different species utilize the Cook Inlet and Knik Arm estuary. Temporal and Spatial Use Studies throughout the Pacific Northwest compiled and compared by Healy (1982) have revealed some general trends as to the temporal and special use of estuaries by juvenile salmon. Pink and chum salmon have been found to migrate as fry early in the spring soon after emergence. Pink salmon only reside in inner estuaries for a day or two before moving to rear in outer estuaries or moving directly to sea.
    [Show full text]
  • THE TURNAGAIN-KNIK REGION. by STEPHEN R. CAPPS. the Turnagain-Knik Region, As Here Defined, Includes the Area Bordered on the No
    THE TURNAGAIN-KNIK REGION. By STEPHEN R. CAPPS. INTRODUCTION. LOCATION. The Turnagain-Knik region, as here defined, includes the area bordered on the north and northwest by Knik River and Knik Arm and on the south by Turnagain Arm, Portage Creek, and Portage Glacier. As thus outlined the region is roughly triangular in shape and lies between latitude 60° 45' and 61° 30' and longitude 148° 30' and 150° 5'. (See PI. VI.) On its eastern edge the area studied is bordered by rugged unexplored mountains with* glacier-filled val­ leys, in which travel is slow and difficult. The area of the present investigation was limited in that direction to the more accessible valleys, with the object of covering as much ground as possible within the field season. PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS. The first -geologic investigation in this region was made in 1898, when W. C. Mendenhall,1 who was attached to a War Department expedition in charge of Capt. E. F. Glenn, crossed from Portage Bay over Portage Glacier and descended Portage Creek for a few miles before returning by the same route. A few weeks later he traveled up Glacier Creek and its tributary Crow Creek to the divide and descended Raven Creek and Eagle River (Yukla Creek) to its mouth. In 1904 F. H. Moffit, while studying the gold placers of the Turnagain Arm region 2 visited the placer mines on Crow Creek and prepared a full description of the mining developments at that time. In 1911 B. L. Johnson and later A. H. Brooks, G. C. Martin, and B.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Resource Uses in the Knik Arm Area: Historical and Contemporary Patterns
    TRADITIONAL RESOURCE USES IN THE KNIK ARM AREA: HISTORICAL AND CONTEMPORARY PATTERNS bY James A. Fall Technical Paper Number 25 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence Anchorape, Alaska December 2, 1981 TRADITIONAL RESOURCE USES IN THE KNIK ARM AREA: HISTORICAL AND CONTEMPORARYPATTERNS James Fall Resource Specialist III ABSTRACT This report is a summary of the historical and current uses of wild resources in the Knik Arm drainage area of Alaska. It focuses on the area's aboriginal inhabitants, the -Knik Arm Tanaina (Dena'ina), whose principal communities today include Knik and Eklutna. The paper concludes with an overview of contemporary patterns of resource use within these Dena'ina com- munities. The data derive from several years (1978-1981) of ethnohistorical and ethnographic research on the Upper Cook Inlet region. After a review of the geography and most important natural resources of the region, the report examines the subsistence activities of the Knik Arm Dena'ina within four historic periods: 1) Pre-contact (before 1800); 2) Fur Trade Era (1790's to 1890's); 3) Era of Commercial Activities (1890's _ to 1930's); and 4) Post-World War II (1940's to the present). It notes a basic continuity in resource uses throughout all four periods. The round of subsistence pursuits in aboriginal times included the use of a wide variety of seasonally abundant wild resources. Salmon, especially kings, reds, and silvers, were the major staple of the diet. Waterfowl, eulachon, seal, fresh water fish, moose, caribou, sheep, small game, fur bearers, and numerous plant species were among the other i,mportant sources of food and raw materials which derived from the natural environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoloeical Survey Preliminary Report on Water-Power Resources of Little
    u. S. DEPAHTMENT OF THE INTEIUOR Geoloeical Survey Preliminary Report On Water-Power Resources of Little Susitna River and Cottonwood Creek, Al~ska Fred F. Lawrence March, 1949 Tacoma, Washington Table of Contents Page S1.ll.1'lIl1.ary. •••••••••••• ••••••••••••••• , •••••••••••••••• 1 Introduction •••••.•.•••.•..•.•.•........••.......•• 1 Purpose and Scope•••••••••••• ~ •••••••••••••••••• 1-2 Acla1o"Vlledgrnents •••••••••••••••••••••'•••••••••••• 2 Previ0us ~1vestig~tions ••••..••.•••••••••••.••• 2-3 l'..iaps :'.md 3urve.7s.......... ..•..••••••.•••••• 3-4 Geogr~phY •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••••• 4-9 History •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 8 ••••••••••••••• 9-10 Water Sup~lY••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••10 Clirno.tology••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••10-12 R111iOff •••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••••••••••.•• ••12-14 Estlinqtes of flow•••••••...•.••••••••••••.••••••14 Quality of wnter •••••.•...•••.•••••••.••.•••..••14-15 Water UtilizJtion Pl~n••••••••••••••.••••••••••.••••15-16 Stream Re~jUl·'\.tion••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••16-21 Water Power ••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••••••21 Undeveloped Power Sites ••••••••••••••••••••••••21-23 Market for power ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••24 ILLUSTRATIONS Following page Plate I Location Map •••••••...•••••••..••••....••••.••..••••• Frontis-piece II A Mint Gl!.1cier................................................ 4 B Archangel Creek near mouth•.••...•.•••••.•.•.•.•.••••....••• 4 III A Little Susitna River 2 miles above highvfay bridge looking upstrC.:ll11.
    [Show full text]
  • Anchorage Hunting / Unit 14
    Anchorage Hunting / Unit 14 &XUU\ 3HWHUVYLOOH 3HWHUV&UHHN 7DONHHWQD 6XQVKLQH 0RQWDQD &DVZHOO .DVKZLWQD &KLFNDORRQ 6XWWRQ :LOORZ 0RRVH&UHHN +RXVWRQ :DVLOOD 3DOPHU 6XVLWQD %LJ/DNH .QLN $OH[DQGHU (NOXWQD &KXJLDN (DJOH5LYHU $1&+25$*( )75,&+$5'621 (/0(1'25)$)% $1&+25$*( 0$1$*(0(17$5($ 0$1$*(0(17 $5($ *LUGZRRG +RSH 3RUWDJH Federal Public Lands Open to Subsistence Use 2014/2016 Federal Subsistence Wildlife Regulations 67 Unit 14 / Hunting (See Unit 14 Anchorage map) Unit 14 consists of drainages into the north side of Turnagain Arm west of (and excluding) the Portage Creek drainage; drainages into Knik Arm, excluding drainages of the Chickaloon and Matanuska rivers in Unit 13; drainages into the north side of Cook Inlet east of the Susitna River; drainages into the east bank of the Susitna River downstream from the Talkeetna River; drainages into the south and west bank of the Talkeetna River to its confluence with Clear Creek, the westside drainages of a line going up the south bank of Clear Creek to the first unnamed creek on the south, then up that creek to lake 4408, along the north east shore of lake 4408, and then southeast in a straight line to the northernmost fork of the Chickaloon River. Unit 14A consists of drainages in Unit 14 bounded on the Unit 14B consists of that portion of Unit 14 north of 14A. west by the east bank of the Susitna River, on the north Unit 14C consists of that portion of Unit 14 south of Unit by the north bank of Willow Creek, and Peters Creek to 14A.
    [Show full text]
  • Area Management Report for the Sport Fisheries of Anchorage, 2011–2015
    Fishery Management Report No. 17-04 Area Management Report for the Sport Fisheries of Anchorage, 2011–2015 by Jay Baumer and Brittany Blain February 2016 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Divisions of Sport Fish and Commercial Fisheries Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in the following reports by the Divisions of Sport Fish and of Commercial Fisheries: Fishery Manuscripts, Fishery Data Series Reports, Fishery Management Reports, and Special Publications. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, as well as in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figure or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Mathematics, statistics centimeter cm Alaska Administrative all standard mathematical deciliter dL Code AAC signs, symbols and gram g all commonly accepted abbreviations hectare ha abbreviations e.g., Mr., Mrs., alternate hypothesis HA kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. base of natural logarithm e kilometer km all commonly accepted catch per unit effort CPUE liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., coefficient of variation CV meter m R.N., etc. common test statistics (F, t, χ2, etc.) milliliter mL at @ confidence interval CI millimeter mm compass directions: correlation coefficient east E (multiple) R Weights and measures (English) north N correlation coefficient cubic feet per second ft3/s south S (simple) r foot ft west W covariance cov gallon gal copyright degree (angular ) ° inch in corporate suffixes: degrees of freedom df mile mi Company Co. expected value E nautical mile nmi Corporation Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Surficial Geology of Anchorage and Vicinity Alaska
    Surficial Geology of Anchorage and Vicinity Alaska GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1093 5urficial Geology of Anchorage and Vicinity Alaska By ROBERT D. MILLER and ERNEST DOBROVOLNY 3EOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1093 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication as follows: Miller, Robert David, 1922- Surficial geology of Anchorage and vicinity, Alaska, by Eobert D. Miller and Ernest Dobrovolny. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1959. v, 129 p. illus., map, diagrs., tables. 24 cm. (U.S. Geological Survey. Bulletin 1093) Part of illustrative matter folded in pocket. Bibliography: p. 122-125. 1. Geology Alaska Anchorage area. I. Dobrovolny, Ernest, 1912- joint author. II. Title. (Series) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. CONTENTS Page Abstract__ _____________-_____________-_-__--_-______------_--_-- 1 Introduction.________--__---__-__-____--_--_--_-_---_--_--_----__-. 2 Location and accessibility._____________-__-_____-__--__-_-_.._____-- 3 Present investigation...._-__---_________-_-------______-_-__-_--_ 3 Acknowledgments.___-__-_--___-_______-_--_--_-_--__-__--_-_____- 4 Geography_ ______._._____-___._____-_____.--_-______._--________ 4 Physiography.____-___--_________-_--_------__--_-_--_..-__--__ 4 Soils and vegetation-_____________-_-___--__--_____-_-_________ 6> Climate._________-_----___-_-__-__-__------___-_-_---_-___-_- T Pre-Quaternary rocks______________________________________________ 8*- Pre-Cretaceous(?) rocks._______________________________________ 8- Tertiary rocks...___---_-_---_-___-.--_--._--_--___-------_--_.
    [Show full text]