Fire Safety Challenges of 'Green' Buildings and Attributes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fire Safety Challenges of 'Green' Buildings and Attributes Fire Safety Challenges of ‘Green’ Buildings and Attributes Final Report by: Brian Meacham Meacham Associates Shrewsbury, MA, USA Margaret McNamee Lund University Lund, Sweden October 2020 © 2020 Fire Protection Research Foundation 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169 | Web: www.nfpa.org/foundation | Email: [email protected] —— Page ii —— Foreword In 2012, the Fire Protection Research Foundation published the report, Fire Safety Challenges of Green Buildings, the objectives of which were to a) systematically document a set of green building design elements that may increase fire safety hazards, and, b) share best practices identified via the search with respect to fire hazard risk mitigation associated with green building design elements. This effort identified more some 80 ‘green’ building features and technologies, identified a set of 22 potential sources of increased hazard or risk associated with the ‘green’ features and technologies, identified several fire and other safety events associated with the ‘green’ features and technologies, and presented a relative risk matrix as a qualitative representation of the ‘additional’ hazard or risk presented by ‘green’ buildings and features. In the six and a half years since the project report was published, there have been several major fire events, which involved ‘green’ building features or technologies, notably the Grenfell Tower fire in London (combustible insulation), the Dietz & Watson cold storage warehouse in Delanco, New Jersey (photovoltaic panels, combustible insulation), and a spate of fires in buildings under construction using lightweight timber framing. While each of these can be categorized in many ways, they (and many others) include materials, systems, technologies and features that are considered ‘green’ or sustainable. There has also been new research and some regulatory change. Therefore, the Foundation initiated this project with the goal to conduct a global information search into fire events involving green / sustainable building materials, features and technologies, and into research, regulatory changes, engineering approaches, risk mitigation strategies, and firefighting tactics associated with fire challenges with green / sustainable building materials, features and technologies, which have emerged since the publication of the 2012 report, Fire Safety Challenges of Green Buildings. The Fire Protection Research Foundation expresses gratitude to the report authors Brian Meacham, who is with Meacham Associates located in Shrewsbury, MA, USA, and Margaret McNamee, who is with Lund University located in Lund, Sweden. The Research Foundation appreciates the guidance provided by the Project Technical Panelists, the funding provided by the project sponsors, and all others that contributed to this research effort. The content, opinions and conclusions contained in this report are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Fire Protection Research Foundation, NFPA, Technical Panel or Sponsors. The Foundation makes no guaranty or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any information published herein. About the Fire Protection Research Foundation The Fire Protection Research Foundation plans, manages, and communicates research on a broad range of fire safety issues in collaboration with scientists and laboratories around the world. The Foundation is an affiliate of NFPA. —— Page iii —— About the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Founded in 1896, NFPA is a global, nonprofit organization devoted to eliminating death, injury, property and economic loss due to fire, electrical and related hazards. The association delivers information and knowledge through more than 300 consensus codes and standards, research, training, education, outreach and advocacy; and by partnering with others who share an interest in furthering the NFPA mission. All NFPA codes and standards can be viewed online for free. NFPA's membership totals more than 65,000 individuals around the world. Keywords: green buildings, sustainable, fire safety, risk, performance, resilience Report number: FPRF-2020-13 Project Manager: Amanda Kimball —— Page iv —— Project Technical Panel Francine Amon, RISE Dave Barber, Arup Anthony Hamins, NIST Amanda Robbins, NRC Canada John Shafer, Washington Twp./Avon (Indiana) Fire Department Debbie Smith, BRE Ray Walker, IFMA Representative Peter Weismantle, Adrian Smith + Gordon Gill Architecture LLP Val Ziavras, NFPA Birgitte Messerschmidt, NFPA Project Sponsors Property Insurance Research Group (PIRG): AIG CNA Insurance FM Global Liberty Mutual Insurance Tokio Marine America Travelers Insurance Verisk Zurich Insurance Group —— Page v —— Fire Safety Challenges of ‘Green’ Buildings and Attributes Final Report Brian Meacham* and Margaret McNamee** *Meacham Associates Shrewsbury, MA, USA **Division of Fire Safety Engineering Lund University, Sweden Shrewsbury, MA, USA, October 2020 This report has been funded by the Fire Protection Research Foundation Fire Safety Challenges of ‘Green’ Buildings and Attributes Executive Summary In 2012, the Fire Protection Research Foundation (FPRF) supported a literature review related to fire safety challenges of ‘green’ (sustainable) building materials, systems (technologies) and features. The aims of that work were to: identify documented fire incidents in ‘green’ buildings; define a specific set of elements in ‘green’ building design, including configuration and materials, which, without mitigating strategies, increase fire risk, decrease safety or decrease building performance in comparison with ‘traditional’ construction; identify and summarize existing best practice case studies in which the risk introduced by specific ‘green’ building design elements has been explicitly addressed; and compile research studies related to incorporating building safety, life safety and fire safety as an explicit element in ‘green’ building indices, identifying gaps and specific needed research areas. In the eight years since the 2012 report was published, there have been several major fire events, which involved ‘green’ materials, systems and features (collectively, ‘green’ attributes) in buildings, including the tragic Grenfell Tower fire in London (involving combustible insulation); the Dietz & Watson cold storage warehouse in Delanco, New Jersey (involving photovoltaic panels, combustible insulation); and the 2019 energy storage system (ESS) explosion and fire in Arizona. While each of these can be categorized in many ways, they (and many others) include materials, systems and features that are considered ‘green’ or sustainable. Additionally, since 2012, there has been significant research into the fire performance of a wide range of ‘green’ attributes of buildings, and numerous changes and/or additions to regulations, standards and guidance around managing and mitigating associated fire hazards and risks. Further, new ‘green’ attributes continue to be developed and implemented, which could present fire hazards or risks if unmitigated. In response to the major advances that have taken place since 2012, this work presents a comprehensive review of how the landscape of fire safety challenges of ‘green’ attributes of buildings has developed since 2012. It is based on a global information search into: fire events involving ‘green’ and/or sustainable building materials, systems and features; emerging ‘green’ building materials, systems and features; and research, regulatory changes, engineering approaches, risk mitigation strategies, and firefighting tactics associated with fire challenges with ‘green’ and/or sustainable building materials, systems and features. While the research is comprehensive is scope, it is not exhaustive in detail, given the extent of advancement in these areas which has occurred since 2012. And, while significant advancements have been made, gaps remain, and strategies for proactively incorporating fire performance into development of new ‘green’ building materials, systems and features (product development) are lacking, the tools to proactively assess the fire performance of ‘green’ building materials, systems and features at the product level (e.g., fire performance testing), and as installed in buildings, are lacking, and a broader building regulatory framework and design philosophy for achieving sustainable and fire resilient (SAFR) buildings is also lacking. A fundamental aim of this review is to understand the extent to which unintended fire hazards and risks associated with ‘green’ attributes of building have been addressed, are being considered, and continue to emerge. The risk framework presented in Chapter 6 is at the core of this analysis, surrounded by three main themes: societal objectives (to create modern, ‘green’ buildings which do not endanger our climate); the attributes of the buildings and communities which express these societal objectives (materials, systems and design features); and, finally, control mechanisms that are put in place to ensure that these buildings and communities are fire safe (regulations, standards and guidelines). This framework can be pictured as a tetrahedron (triangular pyramid) with four faces, i.e., “Risk and Performance” at the base, and “Societal Objectives”, “Attributes”, and “Control Mechanisms” as the faces, see Figure ES.1a. For simplicity, the 2D projection of the 3D concept (see Figure ES.1b) has been used to exemplify the system and the interactions between the faces of the tetrahedron. Final Report 2 9 October 2020
Recommended publications
  • Towards Sustainable Use of Building Stock
    OECD/IEA JOINT WORKSHOP ON SUSTAINABLE BUILDINGS: TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE USE OF BUILDING STOCK TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction................................................................................................................................................. 9 Objectives.................................................................................................................................................... 9 Summary of discussions............................................................................................................................ 10 Introductory Session.............................................................................................................................. 10 Session 1: Trends and Issues: Where are we going? ............................................................................. 10 Session 2: What is SUBS?..................................................................................................................... 10 Session 3: What should be done to promote SUBS?............................................................................. 11 Session 4: Flexible Use of Building Stock ............................................................................................ 12 Session 5: Vitalization of the Market for Existing Buildings................................................................ 12 Session 6: Upgrading the energy efficiency of existing buildings ........................................................ 13 Session 7: Information tools contributing
    [Show full text]
  • A Nascent Educational Framework for Fire Safety Engineering
    Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for Fire Safety Journal Manuscript Draft Manuscript Number: FISJ-D-12-00069R1 Title: A NASCENT EDUCATIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR FIRE SAFETY ENGINEERING Article Type: Research Paper Keywords: Fire; Safety; Engineering; Education; Competence Corresponding Author: Prof. Luke A Bisby, BEng, MSc, PhD Corresponding Author's Institution: University of Edinburgh First Author: Michael Woodrow, MEng Order of Authors: Michael Woodrow, MEng; Luke Bisby, BEng, MSc, PhD; Jose L Torero, PhD Abstract: The growing need for fire safety engineering (FSE) design around the world has led to higher education degrees, many of which lack strong foundations in fundamental knowledge and are somewhat deficient in developing skills (application of knowledge) and appropriate attitudes (reflective assessment and synthesis of knowledge). This paper discusses how such programmes are delivering professionals to an FSE industry that has not yet adequately defined competence. Motivated by the need to have a new generation of leaders in FSE that can drive the field through the ongoing and necessary transition to performance-based design that it is currently experiencing, a one-week, intensive global technical leadership seminar was held at Edinburgh University, supported by The Lloyd's Register Educational Trust (LRET). The Seminar was aimed at reflecting on the content and methodology required in comprehensive university programmes capable of educating in design for fire safety in the built environment. Performance-based design for fire, in which prescriptive codes are simply a tool within a performance-based mindset, offers many important benefits but also has many acknowledged problems and risks; this paper argues that paramount among the problems is the way that we, as a global engineering profession, educate and nurture FSE professionals.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordinary Council
    ORDINARY COUNCIL PUBLIC MINUTES WEDNESDAY 26 APRIL 2017 AT 1.05PM Council Members >> The Mayor, Councillor Jenny Hill Councillor Russ Cook Councillor Verena Coombe Councillor Colleen Doyle Councillor Ann-Maree Greaney Councillor Paul Jacob Councillor Mark Molachino Councillor Kurt Rehbein Councillor Margie Ryder Councillor Maurie Soars Councillor Les Walker At this meeting contributions made by members of the public may be recorded by way of audio recording which will be used for the purpose of developing minutes of the meeting and decision making of council. Townsville City Council is bound by the Information Privacy Act 2009 to protect the privacy of personal information. Under Local Law 1 Section 35(3) a person must not make an audio or video recording of a local government meeting, a standing committee meeting, a special committee meeting or an advisory committee meeting unless the chairperson at the meeting gives consent in writing to the recording of the meeting. Further information may be found on council's website at www.townsville.qld.gov.au. TOWNSVILLE CITY COUNCIL ORDINARY COUNCIL WEDNESDAY 26 APRIL 2017 Goals and Strategies of Townsville City Council >> Corporate Plan >> Goal 1: Economic Sustainability - A strong diverse economy which provides opportunities for business and investment with an integrated approach to long term planning where the city’s assets meet the community needs. 1.1 Create economic opportunities for Townsville to drive economic and community prosperity. 1.2 Maximise opportunities through engagement and partnership with stakeholder achieve a strong resilient economy. 1.3 Utilise the City Plan to inform the development of current and future infrastructure needs of Townsville.
    [Show full text]
  • Net Energy Analysis of a Solar Combi System with Seasonal Thermal Energy Store
    Net energy analysis of a solar combi system with Seasonal Thermal Energy Store Colclough, S., & McGrath, T. (2015). Net energy analysis of a solar combi system with Seasonal Thermal Energy Store. Applied Energy, 147, 611-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.088 Published in: Applied Energy Document Version: Peer reviewed version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights © Elsevier 2015. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits distribution and reproduction for non-commercial purposes, provided the author and source are cited. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:29. Sep. 2021 Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for Applied Energy Manuscript Draft Manuscript Number: Title: Net Energy analysis of a Solar Combi System with Seasonal Thermal Energy Store Article Type: Original Paper Keywords: Seasonal Thermal Energy Storage; STES; Passive House; Life Cycle Analysis; Net Energy Ratio Corresponding Author: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Heating, Cooling, and Ventilation Strategies in Passive House Design
    On a Path to Zero Energy Construction: Passive House & Building Workshop Heating, Cooling, and Ventilation Strategies in Passive House Design John Semmelhack www.think-little.com AGENDA o HVAC goals o Heating, Cooling, Dehumidification o Ventilation o Single-family, mixed-humid climate focus HVAC GOALS o We don’t build buildings in order to save energy o Our first job is to provide comfort! o Indoor Air Quality – first, do no harm HEAT – COOL – DEHU AGENDA o PHIUS heating + cooling load standards o Load calculations o Equipment selection o Supplemental dehumidification? o Duct design PHIUS HEATING + COOLING METRICS PHIUS HEATING + COOLING METRICS For a 2,500ft2 house: 10,000 Btu/hr heating load 12,250 Btu/hr cooling load “1-ton” LOAD CALCULATIONS* Why do we do load calcs? * aka “Peak loads” or “Design Loads” LOAD CALCULATIONS Why do we do load calcs? Prior to selecting equipment, we need to know how much heat we need to add or remove in order to maintain comfort during peak/design conditions. We’d like to pick equipment that’s neither too small (bad comfort) nor too big (higher cost and bad comfort) ……but just right! LOAD CALCULATIONS Three loads: 1. Heating 2. Sensible cooling 3. Latent cooling (aka dehumidification) LOAD CALCULATIONS Three loads: 1. Heating 2. Sensible cooling 3. Latent cooling LOAD CALCULATION METHODS Manual J o Room-by-room or block load o Typically uses 1% and 99% ASHRAE design temperatures o Incorporates solar and internal gains for cooling, but not for heating o Thermal mass/lag is accounted for in solar gains.
    [Show full text]
  • Passive House 101
    PASSIVE HOUSE 101 An Introduction t o Passive Buildings & D e s i g n AGENDA What is Passive House Passive House Standards & Metrics Design Principles and Features Case Studies and Lessons Learned Can You Find the Passive House? Can You Find the Passive House? Passive House Passive House is a performance-based building certification that focuses on the dramatic reduction of energy use for space heating and cooling Passive House achieves: ● Dramatic reduction in overall energy use ● Dramatic reduction in carbon emissions ● Proven improvement in air quality, health, and occupant comfort ● Greater building durability ● Resilience to major weather events ● Lower operating costs ● Pathway to net-zero Goal: 90% reduction in heating and cooling loads comparted to a typical building Goal: 60-70% reduction in Typical Residential Passive House overall energy use Building comparted to typical buildings Measured Performance: 30-45% less carbon emissions than MA stretch code buildings Source: New Ecology Air Quality, Health, and Comfort Continuous ventilation of filtered air Increased use of non-toxic materials Consistent comfortable room temps Elimination of air drafts Increased natural lighting Quieter acoustic conditions Durability & Resilience Shelter in Place Maintain consistent indoor temps during extreme weather and power outages Durable & Long Lasting Construction Resists mold, rot, pests & water intrusion Passive Not Active Lower reliance on mechanical systems Passive House Examples Rocksbury House Placetailor Design/Build 33.2 EUI Wayland
    [Show full text]
  • Early Career Award in Fire Science
    Early Career Award in Fire Science 2016 Recipient Dr. Guillermo Rein, Senior Lecturer, Imperial College London, UK Dr. Rein is a prominent fire behavior scientist, studying ignition, combustion emission, smoldering and interactions of fires and ecosystems. At this early stage of his career, his greatest contributions have been in the area of smoldering wildfires, where he has revolutionized the experimental and numerical description of these fires, translating science from engineering to applications such as fire history, emissions and climate change. This work has been published in over 67 journal papers, receiving more than 1700 citations throughout his short career. Among these, 17 journal papers and 6 keynote lectures have focused specifically on wildland fires. Dr. Rein was first introduced to the subject of wildland fires by Professor Scott Stephens in his course Fire Ecology at University of California, Berkeley. Immediately following his PhD on computational smoldering combustion (graduated in Dec. 2005), he began his early research career on wildland fires as a member of the large international consortium, Fire Paradox (EU FP7) in 2006. Since then, he became a leader in the emerging field of smoldering wildfires, relating their effects to carbon emissions, fire ecology, and climate change. The impact of his work in both the combustion and geoscience communities has been equally impressive and measurable. The results of his wildfire work have been published in 2 book chapters, the International Journal of Wildland Fire, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), Nature Geoscience and awarded twice the Distinguished Paper Awards (2009 and 2013) in the Proceedings of the Combustion Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Moisture Conditions in Passive House Wall Constructions
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Energy Procedia 78 ( 2015 ) 219 – 224 6th International Building Physics Conference, IBPC 2015 Moisture conditions in passive house wall constructions Lars Gullbrekkena*, Stig Gevingb, Berit Timea, Inger Andresena aSINTEF Buiding and Infrastructure, Trondheim, Norway bNTNU, Norwegian University of Science and technology, Department of Civil and Transport Engineering , Trondheim, Norway Abstract Buildings for the future, i.e zero emission buildings and passive houses, will need well insulated building envelopes, which includes increased insulation thicknesses for roof, wall and floor constructions. Increased insulation thicknesses may cause an increase in moisture levels and thereby increased risk of mold growth. There is need for increased knowledge about moisture levels in wood constructions of well insulated houses, to ensure robust and moisture safe solutions. Monitoring of wood moisture levels and temperatures have been performed in wall- and roof constructions of 4 passive houses in three different locations representing different climate conditions in Norway. © 20152015 The The Authors. Authors. Published Published by byElsevier Elsevier Ltd. Ltd This. is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (Peerhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-review under responsibility of the CENTRO). CONGRESSI INTERNAZIONALE SRL. Peer-review under responsibility of the CENTRO CONGRESSI INTERNAZIONALE SRL Keywords: Wood fram wall, moisture, mould growth, 1. Introduction Buildings that are designed to meet the high energy performance requirement of the future, require well insulated building envelopes, with increased thicknesses of roof, wall and floor structures. Increased insulation thicknesses in the external structure could lead to increased moisture level and thus increased risk of mold growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Legacy – the All Blacks
    LEGACY WHAT THE ALL BLACKS CAN TEACH US ABOUT THE BUSINESS OF LIFE LEGACY 15 LESSONS IN LEADERSHIP JAMES KERR Constable • London Constable & Robinson Ltd 55-56 Russell Square London WC1B 4HP www.constablerobinson.com First published in the UK by Constable, an imprint of Constable & Robinson Ltd., 2013 Copyright © James Kerr, 2013 Every effort has been made to obtain the necessary permissions with reference to copyright material, both illustrative and quoted. We apologise for any omissions in this respect and will be pleased to make the appropriate acknowledgements in any future edition. The right of James Kerr to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 All rights reserved. This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired out or otherwise circulated in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. A copy of the British Library Cataloguing in Publication data is available from the British Library ISBN 978-1-47210-353-6 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-47210-490-8 (ebook) Printed and bound in the UK 1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2 Cover design: www.aesopagency.com The Challenge When the opposition line up against the New Zealand national rugby team – the All Blacks – they face the haka, the highly ritualized challenge thrown down by one group of warriors to another.
    [Show full text]
  • Passive House Standard: Heating a Home with a Hair Dryer
    Passive Houses – “Homes you can Heat with a Hair Dryer.” For City of Portland ReTHINK Education Series 2009 By Tad Everhart - [email protected] – 503 239-8961 This is not the Time for “Incrementalism.” With potentially catastrophic climate change, severe economic decline, need for green collar jobs, and increasing energy prices, we need to build carbon-neutral buildings, not buildings that are merely x% “better than code.” After all, a code building is the worst building you can legally build. Why base our standard on the worst building? Passive House is an Approach that starts with Conservation and a Standard based on Science and Technology. Passive House starts from the premise that we must reduce energy use in buildings as far as possible. It recognizes that generally speaking, conserving energy and using it efficiently is less expensive than producing energy. It optimizes the building to the heating source as far as is technically and economically feasible. You can design and build a Passive House for no more than a 10% increase in costs---a cost quickly repaid. If we all lived in houses meeting the Passive House standard, we could lower our energy use to sustainable levels. And as technology progresses, we can raise the standards. Let’s Radically Reduce Building Energy Use: 90% below Conventional Buildings. At this level of efficiency, we can eliminate the conventional heating or air conditioning systems. This offsets any extra costs in building an energy-efficient envelope. Passive House Europe has 15,000 Passive Houses. The European Parliament adopted a resolution to make Passive House the mandatory building energy code for member nations starting 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Performance Art Permit
    Policy Grants Pass Department of Public Safety 4XX Fire Policy Manual Fire Performance Art Permit 4XX.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines to advise fire performance venues and artists of safety considerations and practices consistent with fire and life safety codes and public assembly safety concerns. 4XX.2 POLICY This policy applies to all acts of fire performance art occurring within all areas in which Grants Pass Department of Public Safety has authority. Fire art refers to performances or demonstrations such as fire breathing, fire juggling, fire dancing, etc. Not included: pyrotechnics and flame effects (these are addressed in a different policy and require a separate permit). The business owner, event coordinator and the fire performer are responsible for all aspects of fire and life safety. Failure to possess a current permit and follow the minimum requirements set forth in this document may result in revocation of permit, future permits and/or issuing of citation(s). Fire performance artists shall: 1. Be at least 18 years of age. a. EXCEPTION: Performers age 16 to 18 may be allowed at the discretion of the Fire Marshal’s Office with written consent from a parent or legal guardian. They must be under the direct supervision of an adult fire performance troupe leader or instructor. 2. Have valid, state issued identification and Fire Performance Permit readily accessible at each performance. 3. Audience: It should be recognized that audiences, especially youthful ones, may not fully understand the dangers associated with fire performance art. Every effort should be made to emphasize the safety precautions and dangers of such activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture and the Place of Haka in Commemoration at Gallipoli
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts - Papers Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences & Humanities 1-1-2015 Me Haka I te Haka a Tānerore?: Māori 'Post-War' Culture and the Place of Haka in Commemoration at Gallipoli Hemopereki Simon University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Simon, Hemopereki, "Me Haka I te Haka a Tānerore?: Māori 'Post-War' Culture and the Place of Haka in Commemoration at Gallipoli" (2015). Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts - Papers. 2971. https://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers/2971 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Me Haka I te Haka a Tānerore?: Māori 'Post-War' Culture and the Place of Haka in Commemoration at Gallipoli Abstract This article is an extensive discussion from a Maori perspective into issues around the use of Maori cultural terms, in particular haka, to commemorate the fallen in WWI. Embedded in the article are key theories of cultural memory, 'war culture' and 'post-war culture'. The research outlines the differences between European and Indigenous war and post war cultural practices focusing on Maori. It seeks to understand the reluctance of Turkish officials to see haka being performed when it was apparently banned from ceremonies in 2005. It outlines the media reporting on the issue and the subsequent reintroduction of haka in August 2015 at the centenary of the Chunuk Bair battle.
    [Show full text]