DOCSLIB.ORG

Political State and NATO

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Political State and NATO Ten years of aspiration perception of NATO in Slovenia POLITICALPOLITICAL STATESTATE ANDAND NATONATO According to official state documents1, integration seen in a historical perspective, offering time, and mentioned that Slovenia was into NATO represents Slovenia’s basic foreign policy the chance for European nations to over- the best candidate for the next round of come the divisions of the past. NATO en- NATO enlargement. Included in her text, interest and national security priority. NATO is seen largement, as well as Slovenia’s potential however, was also a warning that Slove- as “the only efficient organisation for collective secu- membership in the Alliance, is not direct- nia should be more active in the conflict rity in the existing European security architecture”. ed against other states, including Russia. resolution process in South Eastern Eu- NATO provides collective defence to member coun- According to high representatives of rope, should continue economic liberaliza- tries, but also assumes responsibility for European Slovenia, the country was eligible for the tion, and be more open for foreign invest- security and stability in general, including “out of first round of post-Cold War NATO en- ments.3 area” operations. NATO demonstrated its efficiency largement. Slovenia fulfilled all general cri- One of the questions to be raised while teria set by the NATO Enlargement Study; analysing the document was the readi- in such a role during the Bosnian-Herzegovinian war, however, not one of the representatives ness of the Slovenian Army to join NATO. where European security structures failed to stop the spoke about defence or military criteria. It The document foresaw a lot of substantial conflict without a substantial transatlantic support. is most clear that inter-operability of activities to be carried out by the Army to The Kosovo crisis in spring 1999 was another exam- Slovenian armed forces could be a subject achieve the NATO standards and interop- ple of this kind. of serious debate in this respect. Another erability with the armed forces of NATO important issue to be addressed here, are countries. It seems the Slovenian Army According to the official view, the fun- Slovenia’s on-going disputes with its has undergone constant reform since its damental reasons for Slovenia to become neighbours, especially Croatia. Despite conception, with few tangible results. The a member of NATO are: (1) the member- this situation, there is an immanent hope content analysis revealed that the dead- ship in NATO would strengthen the securi- that NATO will primarily respect its own lines set by the document are not respect- ty of the country and contribute to its long- objective criteria, rather than take into ac- ed by different governmental agencies, in- term development; (2) the consequences count different political considerations cluding the Ministry of Defence and the of NATO membership are not estimated to about the enlargement itself. It is also evi- Army. That is to say, those “diplomatic ru- be only those of security and military, but dent that the representatives of the mours” on the weakness of the Slovenian also refer to foreign policy, economic, sci- Slovenian state believed in a democratic Army, not enough educated military offi- entific, research, technical, and organisa- effect of NATO enlargement – member- cers, and leaking of military secrets, were tional issues, (3) a potential NATO mem- ship would foster democratic political close to the truth. bership of Slovenia means the inclusion of processes in Slovenia. The optimistic estimation of NATO country in the political and security frame- There is great optimism within Sloveni- membership costs seen in previous years work of the most developed Western Eu- a’s official ranks regarding the relative is surpassed by the “national strategy”. ropean and North American countries, it costs of NATO: Slovenia is capable and The Government envisaged an approxi- also means, promotion of economic and prepared to pay and the expenditures will mate 25 per cent increase in its defence social co-operation and development, be lower than in the case of an individual budget due to the expected gradual ac- strengthening credibility of Slovenia, pro- approach to security. cession to NATO (from 1.83 per cent of motion of its international status and ne- The official document on NATO and GDP in 1997 to 2.3 per cent in year gotiating power, and consolidation of the Slovenia, adopted by the Government, is 2003). In year 2000, this objective was international identity of Slovenia as a de- comprised of 23 pages, many which hard- postponed to year 2010, while the actual mocratic and peaceful country. ly correspond to the title of the document: trend goes in the opposite direction – in Hence, the official standpoint of Slove- National Strategy for Integration of Repub- 2000 the defence spending reached nia as far as the potential membership in lic of Slovenia into NATO. Namely, the doc- merely 1.45 per cent of GDP. NATO is concerned, emphasizes security ument addresses broader topics such as The document anticipates only positive and non-security aspects of the member- European security architecture, the role of effects of Slovenia’s membership in NATO ship as equally important. OSCE, the history of NATO-Slovenia and (enhanced stability and greater possibility While analysing the official statements, WEU-Slovenia relations, and Common For- of social development, enhanced security, it could be seen that the attitudes of the eign Security Policy of EU, while the activi- better image of the country within the in- highest representatives within the Sloven- ties to achieve membership are com- ternational community, economic, scientif- ian state toward NATO membership were pressed in points with no firm theoretical ic and technological push, and even long- very general and political in nature. All rep- or empirical background, therefore, hardly term reduction of defence expenditures) resentatives placed the discussion of NA- to be called “national strategy”. while the possible negative consequences TO enlargement in a spectrum of globali- The official standpoint of Slovenia, as of membership are not forecast. sation and European integration, and they far as potential membership in NATO is all viewed enlargement as a means to concerned, equally emphasizes security Parliamentary political parties’ achieve a new European security ‘archi- and non-security aspects of membership, attitude toward NATO tecture’. Therefore, Slovenian high state i.e. political, economic, scientific, and even Although differences existed among representatives envisaged NATO as a col- cultural (values). parliamentary political parties by the end lective security organisation, rather than a Not everything was so clear regarding of 1998 we might say that it is possible to collective defence organisation.2 Another Slovenia’s fulfilment of basic criteria set by classify Slovenian political parties into two common element of all presented stand- NATO for the first round of its enlarge- groups with regard to this issue. The first points was the attitude toward military ment. Namely, the high representatives of group comprised the four most powerful force in Europe as an artefact – their atti- the state claimed Slovenia fulfilled the cri- parliamentary parties – the Liberal Democ- tudes expressed a high degree of opti- teria, while the document envisaged many racy of Slovenia (LDS), the Slovenian Peo- mism about the low possibility of the use foreign policy, military, administrative, and ple’s Party (SLS), the Social Democratic of military force on the continent. financial activities to be carried out in ref- Party of Slovenia (SDS) and the Slovenian Slovenian membership in NATO would erence to those criteria. Therefore, we Christian Democrats (SKD) – that unre- mean the return of the country to a cultur- could assume, the Slovenian government servedly supported Slovenia’s entry into al circle that Slovenia belonged in the accepted the (mainly American) criticism NATO. The position of the SKD however, past, and is understood as a correction of brought to Slovenia by US State Secretary has not been set out in detail and justified the historical injustice caused by the con- Madeleine Albright after the Madrid Sum- – at least not publicly4. The second group sequences of the Second World War. It is mit. Albright gave some credit to Slovenia contained the United List of Social De- also evident that NATO enlargement is for all its reforms accomplished by that mocrats (ZLSD), the Democratic Pension- 78 ers’ Party (DESUS) and the Slovenian Na- garding the fulfilment of conditions for cisive influence, while the opposition par- tional Party (SNS), which declaratively NATO membership, it is important to ties blamed the government for the fail- supported NATO membership but with stress that one of the basic criteria set by ure. The two key coalition parties that certain reservations or under certain con- NATO was that disputes with neighbour- made up the government – the LDS and ditions. The ZLSD was most divided with ing countries should be resolved. Obvious- the SLS – at least indirectly saw the diffi- regard to this issue, since the party’s ly, Slovenia doesn”t meet this criterion, culties of Slovenia”s integration with NA- Women’s Forum and Youth Forum explic- since there are still undecided questions TO in the unsatisfactory readiness of the itly opposed NATO membership for Slove- with Croatia, among them the question of Slovenian
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Slovenia Before the Elections
    PERSPECTIVE Realignment of the party system – Slovenia before the elections ALEŠ MAVER AND UROŠ URBAS November 2011 The coalition government under Social Democrat Prime make people redundant. Nevertheless, the unemploy- Minister Borut Pahor lost the support it needed in Parlia- ment rate increased by 75 per cent to 107,000 over three ment and early elections had to be called for 4 Decem- years. This policy was financed by loans of 8 billion eu- ber, one year before completing its term of office. What ros, which doubled the public deficit. are the reasons for this development? Which parties are now seeking votes in the »political marketplace«? What However, Prime Minister Pahor overestimated his popu- coalitions are possible after 4 December? And what chal- larity in a situation in which everybody hoped that the lenges will the new government face? economic crisis would soon be over. The governing par- ties had completely different priorities: they were seek- ing economic rents; they could not resist the pressure of Why did the government of lobbies and made concessions; and they were too preoc- Prime Minister Borut Pahor fail? cupied with scandals and other affairs emerging from the ranks of the governing coalition. Although the governing coalition was homogeneously left-wing, it could not work together and registered no significant achievements. The next government will thus Electoral history and development be compelled to achieve something. Due to the deterio- of the party system rating economic situation – for 2012 1 per cent GDP growth, 1.3 per cent inflation, 8.4 per cent unemploy- Since the re-introduction of the multi-party system Slo- ment and a 5.3 per cent budget deficit are predicted – venia has held general elections in 1990, 1992, 1996, the goals will be economic.
    [Show full text]
  • General Election in Slovenia
    GENERAL ELECTIONS IN SLOVENIA 4th December 2011 European Elections monitor The Rightwing Opposition Forces forecast to win in the Slovenian General Elections on from Corinne Deloy translated by Helen Levy 4th December next. ANALYSIS On 4th December next Slovenia will be holding the first early general elections in its history. 1 month before This election follows parliament’s rejection on 20th September last of the confidence motion the poll presented by Borut Pahor’s government (Social Democratic Party, SD). 51 MPs of the Demo- cratic Party (SDS), the People’s Party (SLS), the Slovenian National Party (SNS), Zares (Z) and of the Democratic Pensioners’ Party (DeSUS) voted against the text, 36 members of the Social Democratic Party and of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDS) as well as three independent MPs voted in support. The Slovenian Parliament was dissolved on 21st October. Borut Pahor is the third Slovenian head of government to fall after Alojz Peterle (Slovenian Christian-Democrats) in 1992 and Janez Drnovsek (LDS) in 2000. After the announcement of the government’s collapse, President of the Republic, Danilo Türk left New York where he was attending the UN’s General Assembly to return to Ljubljana. “The vote of defiance has worsened the political crisis,” he declared, calling on all political parties to show courage rapidly in order to find solutions to the crisis in the interest of the Slovenian people. “The vote of defiance is good news because it will lead to a new government that will have wider public support, which is vital if the necessary decisions are to be taken,” declared Janez Sustarsic, professor at the Faculty of Management in Koper.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Slovenia On
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND LEGAL AFFAIRS DIRECTORATE OF MONITORING Strasbourg, 7 December 2007 Public Greco Eval III Rep (2007) 1E Theme II Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Slovenia on Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II) Adopted by GRECO at its 35 th Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 3-7 December 2007) Secrétariat du GRECO GRECO Secretariat www.coe.int/greco Conseil de l’Europe Council of Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex +33 3 88 41 20 00 Fax +33 3 88 41 39 55 I. INTRODUCTION 1. Slovenia joined GRECO in 1999. GRECO adopted the First Round Evaluation Report (Greco Eval I Rep (2000) 3E) in respect of Slovenia at its 4 th Plenary Meeting (12-15 December 2000) and the Second Round Evaluation Report (Greco Eval II Rep (2003) 1E) at its 16 th Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 8-12 December 2003). The aforementioned Evaluation Reports, as well as their corresponding Compliance Reports, are available on GRECO’s homepage (http://www.coe.int/greco ). 2. GRECO’s current Third Evaluation Round (launched on 1 January 2007) deals with the following themes: - Theme I – Incriminations: Articles 1a and 1b, 2-12, 15-17, 19 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Law Convention on Corruption (ETS 173) 1, Articles 1-6 of its Additional Protocol 2 (ETS 191) and Guiding Principle 2 (criminalisation of corruption). - Theme II – Transparency of party funding: Articles 11, 12, 13b, 14 and 16 of Recommendation Rec(2003)4 on Common Rules against Corruption in the Funding of Political Parties and Electoral Campaigns, and - more generally - Guiding Principle 15 (financing of political parties and election campaigns) .
    [Show full text]
  • Damjan Lajh and Meta Novak Slovenian Bubble in the Brussels: from Best Student in Class to Passive Observer? Debateu Jean Monnet
    DebatEU Jean Monnet paper No 2020/01 Damjan Lajh and Meta Novak Slovenian Bubble in the Brussels: From Best Student in Class to Passive Observer? DebatEU Jean Monnet Paper No 2020/01 May 2020 URL: jmce-ljubljana.eu To cite this article: Lajh, D., & Novak, M. (2020). Slovenian Bubble in the Brussels: From Best Student in Class to Passive Observer? DebatEU Jean Monnet Paper, 2020/01. JEAN MONNET PAPERS publishes pre-print manuscript on the policymaking process and policy studies in Europe. The series is interdisciplinary in character and accept papers in the field of political science, international relations, European studies, sociology, law and similar. It publishes work of theoretical, conceptual as well as of empirical character and it also encourages submissions of policy-relevant analyses, including specific policy recommendations. Papers are available in electronic format only and can be downloaded in pdf-format at jmce- ljubljana.eu. Issued by University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences Kardeljeva ploščad 5 1000 Ljubljana Email: [email protected] Tel: +386 1 5805 227 Fax: +386 1 5805 103 www.fdv.uni-lj.si This publication has been co-funded with support from Erusmus+ Programme of the European Union. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the authors, and the European Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. 1 DebatEU Jean Monnet paper No 2020/01 Slovenian Bubble in the Brussels: From Best Student in Class to Passive Observer? Damjan Lajh and Meta Novak Abstract: With dissolution of socialist Yugoslavia Slovenia turned towards the European Union (EU) membership.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Populism in Europe
    2018 State of Populism in Europe The past few years have seen a surge in the public support of populist, Eurosceptical and radical parties throughout almost the entire European Union. In several countries, their popularity matches or even exceeds the level of public support of the centre-left. Even though the centre-left parties, think tanks and researchers are aware of this challenge, there is still more OF POPULISM IN EUROPE – 2018 STATE that could be done in this fi eld. There is occasional research on individual populist parties in some countries, but there is no regular overview – updated every year – how the popularity of populist parties changes in the EU Member States, where new parties appear and old ones disappear. That is the reason why FEPS and Policy Solutions have launched this series of yearbooks, entitled “State of Populism in Europe”. *** FEPS is the fi rst progressive political foundation established at the European level. Created in 2007 and co-fi nanced by the European Parliament, it aims at establishing an intellectual crossroad between social democracy and the European project. Policy Solutions is a progressive political research institute based in Budapest. Among the pre-eminent areas of its research are the investigation of how the quality of democracy evolves, the analysis of factors driving populism, and election research. Contributors : Tamás BOROS, Maria FREITAS, Gergely LAKI, Ernst STETTER STATE OF POPULISM Tamás BOROS IN EUROPE Maria FREITAS • This book is edited by FEPS with the fi nancial support of the European
    [Show full text]
  • The Far Right in Slovenia
    MASARYK UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF SOCIAL STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE The Far Right in Slovenia Master‟s thesis Bc. Lucie Chládková Supervisor: doc. JUDr. PhDr. Miroslav Mareš, Ph.D. UČO: 333105 Field of Study: Security and Strategic Studies Matriculation Year: 2012 Brno 2014 Declaration of authorship of the thesis Hereby I confirm that this master‟s thesis “The Far Right in Slovenia” is an outcome of my own elaboration and work and I used only sources here mentioned. Brno, 10 May 2014 ……………………………………… Lucie Chládková 2 Acknowledgments I would like to express my gratitude to doc. JUDr. PhDr. Miroslav Mareš, Ph.D., who supervised this thesis and contributed with a lot of valuable remarks and advice. I would like to also thank to all respondents from interviews for their help and information they shared with me. 3 Annotation This master‟s thesis deals with the far right in Slovenia after 1991 until today. The main aim of this case study is the description and analysis of far-right political parties, informal and formal organisations and subcultures. Special emphasis is put on the organisational structure of the far-right scene and on the ideological affiliation of individual far-right organisations. Keywords far right, Slovenia, political party, organisation, ideology, nationalism, extremism, Blood and Honour, patriotic, neo-Nazi, populism. 4 Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 7 2. Methodology .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Information Guide Euroscepticism
    Information Guide Euroscepticism A guide to information sources on Euroscepticism, with hyperlinks to further sources of information within European Sources Online and on external websites Contents Introduction .................................................................................................. 2 Brief Historical Overview................................................................................. 2 Euro Crisis 2008 ............................................................................................ 3 European Elections 2014 ................................................................................ 5 Euroscepticism in Europe ................................................................................ 8 Eurosceptic organisations ......................................................................... 10 Eurosceptic thinktanks ............................................................................. 10 Transnational Eurosceptic parties and political groups .................................. 11 Eurocritical media ................................................................................... 12 EU Reaction ................................................................................................. 13 Information sources in the ESO database ........................................................ 14 Further information sources on the internet ..................................................... 14 Copyright © 2016 Cardiff EDC. All rights reserved. 1 Cardiff EDC is part of the University Library
    [Show full text]
  • Slovenian Democratic Path After European Union Accession
    The Difficult Look Back: Slovenian Democratic Path after European Union Accession MIRO HAČEK Politics in Central Europe (ISSN: 1801-3422) Vol. 15, No. 3 DOI: 10.2478/pce-2019-0023 Abstract: In the third wave of democratic changes in the early 1990s when the Central and Eastern European (CEE) political landscape changed radically and the democrati‑ sation processes started in the eastern part of the continent, Slovenia was one of the most prominent countries with the best prospects for rapid democratic growth. Slove‑ nia somewhat luckily escaped the Yugoslav civil wars and towards the end of the 20th century was already on the path towards a stable and consolidated democracy with the most successful economy in the entire CEE area. After the dissolution of Yugoslavia, Slovenia had a simple and straight ‑forward political goals, i.e. to join the European union as soon as possible, thus consolidating its place among the most developed countries within the region. After some setbacks, this goal was accomplished in (so far) the biggest enlargement to the Union in May 2004. But what happened after Slovenia managed to successfully achieve its pair of major political goals? In this chapter, we search for an answer to this question and find out why Slovenian voters are increas‑ ingly distrustful not only of political institutions, but why so ‑called new political faces and instant political parties are so successful and why Slovenian democracy has lost a leading place among consolidated democracies in CEE. Keywords: Slovenia; European Union; membership; distrust; democracy. Introduction After declaring its independence from former Yugoslavia in 1991, the Republic of Slovenia expressed its willingness and objective, both in its strategic develop‑ ment documents and at the highest political levels, to become a full member of POLITICS IN CENTRAL EUROPE 15 (2019) 3 419 the European Union (EU).1 As the crucial developmental documents2 indicate, the optimum long ‑term development of the Slovenian economy is inextricably tied to Slovenia’s full membership in the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Dossiers Under the Slovenian EU Council Presidency
    BRIEFING Outlook for upcoming Presidency Priority dossiers under the Slovenian EU Council Presidency INTRODUCTION Slovenia will, in the second half of 2021, hold its second Presidency of the Council of the EU since joining the EU in 2004. It will conclude the work of the Trio Presidency composed of Germany, Portugal and Slovenia. Slovenia is a democratic parliamentary republic with a proportional electoral system. The Slovenian parliament is bicameral, made up of the National Assembly (composed of 90 members) and the National Council (composed of 40 members). In the National Assembly, there are 88 representatives of political parties and two representatives of the Italian and Hungarian national communities, the latter two elected to represent their interests. The National Assembly elects the Prime Minister and the government. The current government is a four-party coalition, made up of the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS); the Modern Centre Party (SMC), the Democratic Party of Slovenian Pensioners (DeSUS) and New Slovenia—Christian Democrats (NSi). The Prime Minister, Mr Janez Janša from the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS), was elected to office on 3 March 2020. The next general elections in Slovenia will take place no later than 5 June 2022. Other political parties represented in parliament are the List of Marjan Šarec (LMS), Social Democrats (SD), Party of Alenka Bratušek (SAB), The Left, and the Slovenian National Party (SNS). Published by EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Author: Lucienne Attard Interinstitutional Relations Unit, Directorate-General for the Presidency PE 690.680 – June 2021 EN EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service PART A: POLITICAL PRIORITIES OF THE SLOVENIAN PRESIDENCY This note looks at the draft Slovenian Presidency priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • European Election Study 2014 EES 2014 Voter Study First Post-Electoral Study
    European Election Study 2014 EES 2014 Voter Study First Post-Electoral Study Release Notes Sebastian Adrian Popa Hermann Schmitt Sara B Hobolt Eftichia Teperoglou Original release 1 January 2015 MZES, University of Mannheim Acknowledgement of the data Users of the data are kindly asked to acknowledge use of the data by always citing both the data and the accompanying release document. How to cite this data: Schmitt, Hermann; Popa, Sebastian A.; Hobolt, Sara B.; Teperoglou, Eftichia (2015): European Parliament Election Study 2014, Voter Study. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5160 Data file Version 2.0.0, doi:10.4232/1. 12300 and Schmitt H, Hobolt SB and Popa SA (2015) Does personalization increase turnout? Spitzenkandidaten in the 2014 European Parliament elections. European Union Politics, Online first available for download from: http://eup.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/06/03/1465116515584626.full How to cite this document: Sebastian Adrian Popa, Hermann Schmitt, Sara B. Hobolt, and Eftichia Teperoglou (2015) EES 2014 Voter Study Advance Release Notes. Mannheim: MZES, University of Mannheim. Acknowledgement of assistance The 2014 EES voter study was funded by a consortium of private foundations under the leadership of Volkswagen Foundation (the other partners are: Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, Stiftung Mercator, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian). It profited enormously from to synergies that emerged from the co-operation with the post-election survey funded by the European Parliament. Last but certainly not least, it benefited from the generous support of TNS Opinion who did the fieldwork in all the 28 member countries . The study would not have been possible the help of many colleagues, both members of the EES team and country experts form the wider academic community, who spent valuable time on the questionnaire and study preparation, often at very short notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Factsheet: the Slovenian National Assembly (Državni Zbor)
    Directorate-General for the Presidency Directorate for Relations with National Parliaments Factsheet: The Slovenian National Assembly (Državni zbor) 1. At a glance Slovenia is a republic and a parliamentary democracy. The Parliament of Slovenia has a bicameral structure and consists of the National Assembly (Državni zbor) which has 90 Members and the National Council (Državni svet) which has 40 Members. The Slovenian Parliament is considered as an “incomplete bicameral system”, meaning that the upper chamber (National Council) does not have equal competences with the lower chamber (National Assembly) and therefore has less authority. The National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia is the supreme representative and legislative institution, exercising legislative and electoral powers as well as control over the Executive. The Members of the National Assembly are directly elected by the citizens. An exception to the principle of universal and equal suffrage is the voting right of the members of the Italian and Hungarian national communities. The right to vote and be elected representative of these communities in the National Assembly is only enjoyed by the members of the communities, and not by all the citizens. Elections to the National Council must take place every four years at the latest, and are based on the principles of proportional representation. The voting age is 18 years. The current Slovenian coalition government under Prime Minister Dr Miro Cerar (SMC/ALDE) is composed of the Party of Modern Center (SMC/ALDE), the Democratic Party of Pensioners in Slovenia (DeSUS/NI) and the Social Democrats (SD/S&D). The incumbent President, who was directly re-elected in 2017 by the citizens for a five-year term, is Mr Borut Pahor.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12 the Impact of the European Union on Party Politics In
    Chapter 12 The Impact of the European Union on Party Politics in Central and Eastern Europe ZSOLT ENYEDI AND PAUL G. LEWIS The chapters included in this volume have covered a wide ground, from the place of parties in the accession referendums to the strategies followed by parties in the 2004 EP elections. In this concluding chapter we return to the themes and questions raised in Chapter 1 and discuss those aspects of the parties and party systems on which the EU and processes of European integration, in the light of our theoretical expectations and the country chapters, have exercized or should have exercized, the most decisive impact. We then focus on four areas: changes in the fundamental characteristics of the party systems, the ideological transformation of parties and the role of European party federations in this process, the place of Euroscepticism in electoral competition, and the degree to which EU-related attitudes have received effective representation. In terms of general conclusions and answers to the broad questions raised in Chapter 1 it seems that there has been little direct impact of the EU on the party systems of the new member states. The format of the party systems have been hardly affected, similarly to Western Europe (cf. Mair, 2000). Integration proved to be, however, somewhat more consequential for the mechanics of party systems. As with Marks and Wilson (2000), it may be concluded that ‘Europe’ has exerted an influence that is both pervasive and quite profound – but by no means direct. With respect to the overall outcomes of EU involvement, too, there is little sign that ‘populists and demagogues’ (Grzymała-Busse and Innes, 2003) have been significantly encouraged or that predictions of major instability have been borne out.
    [Show full text]