DOCSLIB.ORG

1. World Energy Issues Monitor 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1. World Energy Issues Monitor 2019 World Energy Issues Monitor 2019 ABOUT THE WORLD ENERGY COUNCIL ABOUT ISSUES MONITOR The World Energy Council is the principal impartial The World Energy Issues Monitor provides a snapshot of network of energy leaders and practitioners promoting what keeps CEOs, Ministers and experts awake at night in an affordable, stable and environmentally sensitive over 90 countries. The monitor helps to define the world energy system for the greatest benefit of all. energy agenda and its evolution over time. It provides a high-level perception of what constitute issues of critical Formed in 1923, the Council is the UN-accredited global uncertainty, in contrast to those that require immediate energy body, representing the entire energy spectrum, action or act as developing signals for the future. It is with over 3,000 member organisations in over 90 an essential tool for understanding the complex and countries, drawn from governments, private and state uncertain environment in which energy leaders must corporations, academia, NGOs and energy stakeholders. operate, and a tool through which one can challenge We inform global, regional and national energy strategies one’s own assumptions on the key drivers within the by hosting high-level events including the World Energy energy landscape. Congress, publishing authoritative studies and working through our extensive member network to facilitate the This tenth iteration of the monitor is based on insights world’s energy policy dialogue. provided by more than 2,300 energy leaders to provide 50 national assessments across six world regions. Further details at www.worldenergy.org and @WECouncil In addition to this report, the interactive online Issues Monitor tool allows the visualisation of the data that Published by the World Energy Council 2019 underpins the Issues Maps. This tool has been developed Copyright © 2019 World Energy Council. All rights in collaboration with our Project Supporter ARUP. reserved. All or part of this publication may be used or reproduced as long as the following citation is included on each copy or transmission: ‘Used by permission of the World Energy Council’ World Energy Council Registered in England and Wales No. 4184478 VAT Reg. No. GB 123 3802 48 Registered Office 62–64 Cornhill London EC3V 3NH United Kingdom MANAGING THE ENERGY TRANSITION FOREWORD In an era of fast and fundamental shifts in the context of the world we live in, where prosperity for all people and a healthy planet must more than ever be treated as a shared responsibility, it is paramount that we are provided with the tools to understand how changes and progress in the national, regional and global landscapes interact with and influence each other. For ten consecutive years, the World Energy Issues Monitor has been gathering the perspectives of energy leaders from public and private sectors across the six regions on 42 key issues that shape and drive our energy system. The Issues Monitor has become the energy leaders’ foremost platform to identify, share and track critical issues surrounding the Energy Transition and assess which ones keeps them most awake at night or busy at work and how these change across time and space. I am delighted that for the tenth anniversary of the Issues Monitor tool, a record number of nearly 2,300 world energy leaders from 86 countries has contributed to the survey. As I reflect on this report and a decade of transition preceding it the following trends stand out: 1. The global Energy Transition is driven by digitalisation, decarbonisation, decentralisation which is illustrated by upward trends of innovation issues including storage, decentralisation, alternative transport, renewables and downward trends of traditionally centralised energy system components 2. Traditional market design is under pressure to reform to enable renewable integration, respond to resilience challenges and incorporate the growing decentralisation movement; 3. The accelerating pace of electrification via renewable energy sources is further shifting focus toward decentralisation and decarbonisation 4. Global strategic competition and the rise of nationalism illustrated by a sharp increase of concerns around trade barriers will impact the pace of the Energy Transition 5. Commodity prices that have been traditionally dominated by oil and gas seem to be incorporating key minerals such lithium and cobalt as they continue their rise in enabling integration of renewable energy and storage technologies 6. Resilience challenges and concerns around cyber threats, extreme weather and energy water nexus remain acute but with great differences in priority depending on the region 7. Hydrogen – although on global average still a weak signal – is moving up in a number of countries including Germany, Japan, Iceland, New Zealand signalling the quest for infrastructure repurposing and need for green liquids as complement to electrification The report further outlines key trends that are unfolding at the global, regional and national levels based on the most recent survey results. In addition, the Issues Monitor’s interactive online tool provides the possibility to track and compare issues’ evolution over-time. I would like to thank all energy leaders and the Council’s Member Committees who have worked contributed to the 2019 Issues Monitor so that this resource can be provided to all energy shapers and I hope it can continue to inform decisions and actions towards our shared development goals. Christoph Frei, Secretary General 1 WORLD ENERGY COUNCIL | ISSUES MONITOR | 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD 1 OVERVIEW 4 1 GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE 5 2 ASSESSING THE ENERGY AGENDA FOR AFRICA 18 REGIONAL OVERVIEW & CONTEXT 19 ALGERIA 23 BURKINA FASO 26 CAMEROON 29 CONGO (DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF) 32 CÔTE D’IVOIRE 35 GHANA 38 NAMIBIA 41 NIGER 44 NIGERIA 47 SOUTH AFRICA 50 3 ASSESSING THE ENERGY AGENDA FOR ASIA 53 REGIONAL OVERVIEW & CONTEXT 54 CHINA 58 INDIA 61 INDONESIA 65 JAPAN 69 MALAYSIA 72 MONGOLIA 75 NEW ZEALAND 78 SRI LANKA 81 4 ASSESSING THE ENERGY AGENDA FOR EUROPE 84 REGIONAL OVERVIEW & CONTEXT 85 AUSTRIA 88 BELGIUM 92 ESTONIA 94 FINLAND 97 FRANCE 101 GERMANY 104 GREECE 107 ICELAND 109 ITALY 112 LATVIA 116 2 MANAGING THE ENERGY TRANSITION LITHUANIA 119 POLAND 122 PORTUGAL 125 ROMANIA 128 RUSSIAN FEDERATION 131 SERBIA 134 SLOVENIA 137 SPAIN 140 SWEDEN 143 SWITZERLAND 146 TURKEY 149 UNITED KINGDOM 152 5 ASSESSING THE ENERGY AGENDA FOR LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN 155 REGIONAL OVERVIEW & CONTEXT 156 ARGENTINA 159 BRAZIL 162 CHILE 165 COLOMBIA 168 ECUADOR 171 PANAMA 174 6 ASSESSING THE ENERGY AGENDA FOR THE MIDDLE EAST AND GULF STATES 177 REGIONAL OVERVIEW & CONTEXT 178 LEBANON 181 UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 184 7 ASSESSING THE ENERGY AGENDA FOR NORTH AMERICA 187 REGIONAL OVERVIEW & CONTEXT 188 CANADA 191 MEXICO 194 8 ASSESSING THE ENERGY AGENDA FOR THE FUTURE ENERGY LEADERS 197 OVERVIEW & CONTEXT 198 METHODOLOGY AND PROJECT CONTRIBUTORS 202 THE 42 WORLD ENERGY ISSUES 203 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 207 3 WORLD ENERGY COUNCIL | ISSUES MONITOR | 2019 OVERVIEW This is the tenth consecutive year of the World Energy Council’s (the Council) annual survey of key challenges and opportunities facing energy leaders in managing and shaping Energy Transitions. This year’s Issues Monitor report provides seven global maps1, six regional maps and fifty national maps. These maps have been developed by analysing the responses of nearly 2,300 energy leaders, drawn from across the Council’s diverse and truly global energy community2. The Council’s Issues Monitor identifies the strategic energy landscape of specific countries and regions in the world, through an analysis of 42 energy issues and 4 digitalisation-specific issues affecting the energy system. It provides aunique reality check and horizon scanning of persistent and emerging concerns involved in whole energy systems transition. This year’s report welcomes a signif- icant increase in both the participation of global leaders (up over 75% from 1,300 to nearly 2,300) as well as the participation of 86 countries. Each Issue Map provides a visual snapshot of the uncertainties and action priorities that energy policymakers, CEOs and leading experts strive to address to shape and manage successful Energy Transitions. Maps can be used in the following ways: • To promote a shared understanding of successful Energy Transitions • To appreciate and contrast regional variations to better understand differing priorities and areas of concern • To follow the evolution of specific technology trends related to the energy sector FIGURE 1: Visual Snapshot – How to read an Issues Map ty n ertai c n U Critical Uncertainties: What keeps Energy Leaders awake at night Action Priorities: Weak Signals What keeps Energy Leaders busy at work World Energy Issues Monitor 2019 - Understanding the Monitor Impact Less urgent More urgent 1. Six of the maps are included in the global overview section while the Future Energy Leader’s issue map is presented in the last section. 2. The Council received survey responses from 86 countries via its national Member Committee network. All of these responses have been incorporated into the Global map, but we have produced only 50 national maps, which correspond to the number of countries that were able to meet the minimum response requirements for the production of a national map. 4 MANAGING THE ENERGY TRANSITION Chapter one Global Perspective 5 WORLD ENERGY COUNCIL | ISSUES MONITOR | 2019 1. GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE The global map and narrative are built from a synthesis of individual country analyses and commentaries. These provide an informed picture of five categories of transition challenges at national, regional and global levels: 1. macroeconomic risks 2. geopolitics 3. business environment 4. energy vision 5. technology The 2019 global map incorporates all survey responses, representing the views of nearly 2,300 energy leaders from 86 countries. In an era referred to by the Council as the Grand Transition1, energy leaders must pay attention to many different signals of change and distinguish key issues from the noise. The Issues Monitor identifies shifting patterns of connected issues which are shaping Energy Transitions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Romania's National Nuclear and Waste Management Program
    Romania’s National Nuclear and Waste Management Program IFNEC Infrastructure Development Working Group May 8, 2014 , Bucharest Stela DIACONU Senior Expert ANDR, Romania CONTENT Main institutions in Romanian nuclear field IFIN-HH INR-Pitesti S.N. Nuclearelectrica S.A. CITON CNCAN Radioactive Waste Management Overview Institutional and legal framework National Strategy for RWM Sources and types of RW Storage and Disposal Facilities Public Involvement ANDR short-time objectives New Challenges „HORIA HULUBEI” NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS AND NUCLEAR ENGINEERING” (IFIN-HH) 1949 - The Institute of Physics of the Romanian Academy was established 1956 - The Physics Institute of the Academy split into an Institute of Atomic Physics (IFA), located at Magurele, outside Bucharest, under Hulubei's direction, and the Bucharest Institute of Physics (IFB), based at the Faculty of Physics of the Bucharest University 1957 - VVRS fission reactor and a U120 cyclotron, both of Soviet make, were put into service on the IFA site, at Magurele 1957 - Romania - founding member of the International Atomic Energy Agency 1997 - the reactor was shut down, waiting for decommissioning 2001 - the Board of Administration of IFIN-HH decided the permanent shutdown and starting of the decommissioning preparation actions. 2002 - the Romanian Government decide the final shutdown for the decommissioning of the Nuclear Reactor VVR-S IFIN-HH develops Basic and Applied Physics Research activities. IFIN-HH ELI-NP Extreme Light Infrastructure-Nuclear Physics A very high intensity
    [Show full text]
  • Building Bridges Or Breaking Bonds? the Belt and Road Initiative and Foreign Aid Competition
    AAIDDATA Research Lab at William & Mary WORKING PAPER 72 April 2019 Building Bridges or Breaking Bonds? The Belt and Road Initiative and Foreign Aid Competition Krishna Chaitanya Vadlamannati School of Politics & International Relations University College Dublin Yuanxin Li School of Politics & International Relations University College Dublin Samuel Brazys School of Politics & International Relations University College Dublin Alexander Dukalskis School of Politics & International Relations University College Dublin Abstract China’s renewed prominence is the most important development in international relations in the 21st century. Despite longstanding rhetoric of its own “peaceful rise”, China is increasingly viewed as a long-term strategic competitor, especially in the United States. Foreign aid is one arena where this competition may be playing out. While Western foreign aid principles have emphasized coordination and harmonization, the rise of China as a major development partner has raised the specter of a return to competitive foreign aid practices. Most notably, China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), has received a wary reception by some who view it primarily as a geostrategic effort. We test if the BRI is inducing a competitive foreign aid response by evaluating if countries involved in this initiative are more likely to receive US support for loan packages from the major, Western, multilateral development banks (MDBs). Using an instrumental variable approach, covering 6975 project/loan packages in 16 MDBs from 157 countries during 2013-2018 period, we find that the United States is more likely to vote for MDB packages to countries that have signed on to the BRI, predominantly when the actual amount of Chinese aid flowing to those countries is still low, suggesting the US is competing for “in play” countries.
    [Show full text]
  • World Energy Trilemma Index 2018
    World Energy Trilemma Index 2018 In Partnership with OLIVER WYMAN ABOUT THE WORLD ENERGY COUNCIL ABOUT THE ENERGY TRILEMMA INDEX The World Energy Council is the principal impartial The World Energy Council considers energy network of energy leaders and practitioners promoting sustainability to be defined by three core dimensions– an affordable, stable and environmentally sensitive Energy Security, Energy Equity, and Environmental energy system for the greatest benefit of all. Sustainability. Together, they constitute a ‘trilemma’, and achieving high performance on all three dimensions Formed in 1923, the Council is the UN accredited global entails complex interwoven links between public and energy body, representing the entire energy spectrum, private actors, governments and regulators, economic with over 3,000 member organisations in over 90 and social factors, national resources, environmental countries, drawn from governments, private and state concerns, and individual consumer behaviours. corporations, academia, NGOs and energy stakeholders. We inform global, regional and national energy strategies The World Energy Trilemma Index, prepared annually by hosting high-level events, including the World Energy by the World Energy Council in partnership with global Congress and publishing authoritative studies, and work consultancy Oliver Wyman, along with the Global Risk through our extensive member network to facilitate the Center of its parent Marsh & McLennan Companies since world’s energy policy dialogue. 2010, is a comparative ranking of 125 countries’ energy systems. It provides an assessment of a country’s energy Further details at www.worldenergy.org system performance, reflecting balance and robustness and @WECouncil in the three trilemma dimensions. Published by the World Energy Council 2018 Access the complete Index results and use the interactive Copyright © 2018 World Energy Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation Insights Brief | 2020
    FIVE STEPS TO ENERGY STORAGE Innovation Insights Brief | 2020 In collaboration with the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) ABOUT THE WORLD ENERGY COUNCIL ABOUT THIS INSIGHTS BRIEF The World Energy Council is the principal impartial This Innovation Insights brief on energy storage is part network of energy leaders and practitioners promoting of a series of publications by the World Energy Council an affordable, stable and environmentally sensitive focused on Innovation. In a fast-paced era of disruptive energy system for the greatest benefit of all. changes, this brief aims at facilitating strategic sharing of knowledge between the Council’s members and the Formed in 1923, the Council is the premiere global other energy stakeholders and policy shapers. energy body, representing the entire energy spectrum, with over 3,000 member organisations in over 90 countries, drawn from governments, private and state corporations, academia, NGOs and energy stakeholders. We inform global, regional and national energy strategies by hosting high-level events including the World Energy Congress and publishing authoritative studies, and work through our extensive member network to facilitate the world’s energy policy dialogue. Further details at www.worldenergy.org and @WECouncil Published by the World Energy Council 2020 Copyright © 2020 World Energy Council. All rights reserved. All or part of this publication may be used or reproduced as long as the following citation is included on each copy or transmission: ‘Used by permission of the World
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen on the Horizon: Ready
    HYDROGEN ON THE HORIZON: READY, ALMOST SET, GO? World Energy Council, in collaboration with EPRI and PwC ABOUT The World Energy Council has been at the heart of global, regional and national energy debates for nearly a century, developing new thinking and driving effective action around the world to achieve the WORLD ENERGY benefits of sustainable energy for all. COUNCIL Comprised of over 3,000 member organisations in nearly 90 countries, drawn from governments, private and state corporations, academia and new and wider system shapers stakeholders, the Council is the world’s first and only truly global member-based energy network. The Council works dynamically across the whole energy sector as a global energy transitions platform, pulling together intelligent leadership to catalyse and inform the world’s energy policy dialogue, create impact and drive practical action. The Council does not advocate for any country, company, technology or source of energy. The World Energy Council remains thoroughly committed to the challenge of being both impartial and impactful. To learn more visit www.worldenergy.org Published by the World Energy Council July 2021 Copyright © 2021 World Energy Council. All rights reserved. All or part of this publication may be used or reproduced as long as the following citation is included on each copy or transmission: ‘Used by permission of the World Energy Council’. C w World Energy Council Registered in England and Wales No. 4184478 VAT Reg. No. GB 123 3802 48 Registered Office 62–64 Cornhill London EC3V 3NH United Kingdom This Innovation Insights Briefing on hydrogen is part of a series of publications by the World Energy INNOVATION Council focused on Innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • World Energy Council’S Partner, Arup
    February 2019 The 24th World Energy Congress in Abu Dhabi – more speakers confirmed In September 2019, the world’s energy leaders will meet at the 24th World Energy Congress in Abu Dhabi to determine a course of Energy prosperity for nations, companies, societies, the environment and individuals. Conference sessions will bring together both established experts and thought leaders from across the globe. We are happy to announce some of the most recently confirmed speakers for this year’s Congress. Read more 10th Edition of World Energy Issues Monitor is now launched For the 10th anniversary of the World Energy Issues Monitor a record number of nearly 2,300 world energy leaders from 86 countries have contributed to the survey. The World Energy Issues Monitor 2019 through an analysis of critical issues affecting the energy system, provides seven global, six regional and 50 national issues maps, as well as an interactive online tool developed in cooperation with the World Energy Council’s Partner, Arup. Read more A look back at Africa Energy Indaba 2019 African and global energy leaders convened at the 11th annual Africa Energy INDABA in Johannesburg, South Africa, from 18th to 21st February. Over 3,200 visitors and 1,100 registered participants took part in an event where more than 150 speakers and 274 African & global CEOs were able to discuss challenges and solutions for the African energy sector under the theme “Solutions for Africa” Read more Start-Up Energy Transition Award (SET-100) Update We are excited to share that after the end of our application phase on January 31st, we received almost 450 applications from 80 countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Management in South East Europe (Achievements and Prospects)
    Venelin Tsachevsky Energy management in South East Europe (Achievements and Prospects) Electronic Publications of Pan-European Institute 2/2013 ISSN 1795 - 5076 Energy management in South East Europe (Achievements and Prospects) Venelin Tsachevsky1 2/2013 Electronic Publications of Pan-European Institute http://www.utu.fi/pei Opinions and views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the Pan-European Institute or its staff members. 1 Venelin Tsachevsky was born in 1948 in Sofia. In 1975 he got a Ph.D. degree on international economic relations and in 1989 a second Ph.D. on international relations. Professor of political studies in several Bulgarian Universities. In 2007 - 2009 he was a guest professor at Helsinki University on South Eastern and Bulgaria’s development and foreign policy. VenelinTsachevsky is author of around 300 publications about the development and foreign policy of Bulgaria, the regional cooperation and integration of the Balkan countries to the European Union and NATO. In 2003 - 2006 he was Ambassador of Bulgaria to Finland. Venelin Tsachevsky PEI Electronic Publications 2/2013 www.utu.fi/pei Contents PART I: SOUTH EAST EUROPE AT THE START OF 21st CENTURY ........................ 1 1. Which countries constitute South East Europe? ..................................................... 1 2. Specific place of the region in Europe .................................................................... 5 3. Governance and political transformation ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 JETRO Survey on Business Conditions of Japanese Companies in Asia and Oceania
    2019 JETRO Survey on Business Conditions of Japanese Companies in Asia and Oceania November 21, 2019 Asia and Oceania Division and China and North Asia Division, Overseas Research Department, Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO) Copyright © 2020 JETRO. All rights reserved. 1 Key Points (1) Results of JETRO’s 2019 Survey on Business Conditions of Japanese Companies in Asia and Oceania Business confidence of Japanese-affiliated companies significantly worsened 1. Business confidence slowed down in almost all the countries/regions. Intention to expand business also decreased. (pp.16–19, 21–22) The business confidence of Japanese-affiliated companies slowed down in almost all countries/regions. Intention to expand business also decreased. As a reason for this, many companies answered with “Sales decrease in local markets.” Business confidence turned negative in all countries/regions in Northeast Asia (China, South Korea, Taiwan, and Hong Kong/Macau) for the first time in 10 years. On the other hand, many companies (excluding companies in South Korea and Hong Kong/Macau, etc.) expect that their business confidence will improve in 2020. Hong Kong: The confusion of protests continued. The business confidence of Japanese-affiliated companies worsened. After the Fugitive Offenders and Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Legislation (Amendment) Bill was submitted by the government to the Legislative Council of Hong Kong in March 2019, while protest movements and demonstrations continued in Hong Kong, where the DI for 2019 was the second lowest, at -8.4 percentage points (pp) to the lowest in 2009 (-26.9 pp). As the reason for the decreased operating profit forecast, “Sales decrease in local markets” was cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation Insights Brief | 2020
    FIVE STEPS TO ENERGY STORAGE Innovation Insights Brief | 2020 In collaboration with the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) ABOUT THE WORLD ENERGY COUNCIL ABOUT THIS INSIGHTS BRIEF The World Energy Council is the principal impartial This Innovation Insights brief on energy storage is part network of energy leaders and practitioners promoting of a series of publications by the World Energy Council an affordable, stable and environmentally sensitive focused on Innovation. In a fast-paced era of disruptive energy system for the greatest benefit of all. changes, this brief aims at facilitating strategic sharing of knowledge between the Council’s members and the Formed in 1923, the Council is the premiere global other energy stakeholders and policy shapers. energy body, representing the entire energy spectrum, with over 3,000 member organisations in over 90 countries, drawn from governments, private and state corporations, academia, NGOs and energy stakeholders. We inform global, regional and national energy strategies by hosting high-level events including the World Energy Congress and publishing authoritative studies, and work through our extensive member network to facilitate the world’s energy policy dialogue. Further details at www.worldenergy.org and @WECouncil Published by the World Energy Council 2020 Copyright © 2020 World Energy Council. All rights reserved. All or part of this publication may be used or reproduced as long as the following citation is included on each copy or transmission: ‘Used by permission of the World
    [Show full text]
  • For Internal Study Committee Use Only. Not for External Distribution]
    UNITED STATES SUBMISSION TO THE WORLD ENERGY COUNCIL ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE STUDY [For internal Study Committee use only. Not for external distribution] DRAFT ONE A. Background The United States has relied on voluntary efforts and research and development as the official U.S. Government policy in response to concerns over global climate change. The United States is a signatory to the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change but has not signed onto the Kyoto Protocol. Nevertheless, U.S. Government funding for climate change research is enormous and actions to reduce emission levels are significant. The United States has maintained that climate change issues can be most effectively addressed by promoting economic growth and that reducing the greenhouse gas intensity of the U.S. economy is a more effective approach than the targets and timetable regime imposed by the Kyoto Protocol. B. Introduction to U.S. Emission Data [This report will focus exclusively on U.S. energy related emissions of carbon dioxide] In 2005 the United States emitted about 5,909 million tons of carbon dioxide related to energy. The U.S. Energy Information Administration’s Annual Energy Outlook – 2006 projects emissions to rise to 6,365 million metric tons in 2010; to 7,587 million metric tons in 2025 and to 8,115 million metric tons in 2030. However, the EIA projects carbon dioxide emission intensity to drop significantly during this same period. Carbon dioxide emission intensity is the ratio of metric tons per million dollars of U.S. gross domestic product (GDP). Intensity, which was over 900 metric tons per dollar of GDP in 1980, falls to 503 in 2010; 411 in 2025 and down to 351 in 2030.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Report 2018
    ©2018 Department of External Resources Department of External Resources The Secretariat (3rd Floor) P.O. Box 277 Colombo 00100 Sri Lanka [email protected] http://www.erd.gov.lk Overview Foreign Financing Performance by Divisions Asian Development Bank Division East Asia Division - Japan - Korea World Bank and IMF Division China and Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank Division Middle East and South Asia Division - Middle East Countries - South Asia Countries Advanced Economies Division United Nation Agencies and Technical Assistance Division - United Nation Agencies - Technical Assistance Capital Market and Investment Division Debt Management Division Sector Coordination and Performance Monitoring Division Administration and Financial Performance Vision Shaping the future of Sri Lanka by mobilizing global knowledge, expertise and external financing for accelerated economic growth Mission Facilitate mobilization of external financing at affordable cost with minimum conditionality in support of the economic and social development of Sri Lanka while supporting long term debt sustainability of the country Our Objectives Mobilize external resources at affordable cost to finance development needs in priority sectors Facilitate the effective and efficient utilization of external resources Contribute to maintain long – term external debt sustainability of the country Contribute to the human resource development in the public sector by facilitating effective utilization of foreign training opportunities Continue to strengthen the capacity of
    [Show full text]
  • Romanian Nuclear Power Programme
    2374-52 Joint ICTP-IAEA School of Nuclear Energy Management 5 - 23 November 2012 ROMANIAN NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAMME ROTARU Ioan Management Proiecte Nuclear Sector1, 57 Aleea Teisani 014034 Bucharest ROMANIA ROMANIAN NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAM Dr. Ioan ROTARU Romania IAEA Consultant Annual ICTP/IAEA Nuclear Energy Management School Trieste, Italy, 5 to 23 November,2012 IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency ROMANIAN NPP SHORT HISTORY (1) 1949: first Romanian nuclear research entity Institute for Atomic Physics (IFA) Magurele was founded. 1955: after the first Geneva International Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, the Committee for Nuclear Energy was set up. 1957: first nuclear research reactor imported from former Soviet Union was commissioned in IFA Magurele. In the same year, Romania became the foundation member of the International Agency for Atomic Energy (IAEA) Vienna. Romania started to analyze the introduction of the nuclear power in the energy mix in 1965-1970, by preparing knowledgeable decision for the first NPP. 2 ROMANIAN NPP SHORT HISTORY ((22)) 1970: decision for the introduction of the first NPP in Romania was taken. 1970: as a consequence of the decision to develop the Romanian Nuclear Power program, the Institute for Nuclear Technology (ITN) Pitesti was created. 1975: Romanian Government decided to use for the first NPP the CANDU nuclear power reactor, based on the comparison of the different nuclear technology available on the NPP market. Specific studies were performed for the first NPP project implementation in the country, including nuclear power infrastructure development, NPP site selection and characterization and localization. 3 ROMANIAN NPP SHORT HISTORY ((3)3) First NPP site was selected near Cernavoda town, in Dobrogea (south-east part of Romania).
    [Show full text]